A nuclear strike is unlikely as even Putin can't be mad enough to think he can control the weather and, even if the wind is blowing westerly during a blast, if it changes direction afterward, Russia is screwed as they will be covered in radioactive fallout, which is why dropping a nuke on a neighbouring country is a very bad idea indeed. Also, tactical nukes work in old fashioned war situations when thousands of troops and tanks are gathered in one area, but this isn't how modern warfare works. Ukraine uses small mobile units, and Ukraine is massive, so a tactical nuke would give Russia virtually no strategic advantage anyway, not to mention that that will bring NATO into the war directly and Russia will be destroyed. However, given that Putin is clearly not of sound mind , and unlike in Soviet times, there is no politburo to take out a leader who has lost his faculties, there is always a risk that he may use a nuke or fire multiple nukes. We have to hope that this doesn't happen or if it does, someone will shoot him before he can press the button.

@@richardb8080 Well said Richard, a good analysis.

Your living in a complete fantasyland. You've done ZERO research. Stop watching the MSM. 🙄

@@richardb8080 If Russia uses a nuke on Ukraine and NATO responds, to ‘destroy Russia’ as you put it. Do you think we’d some how not be destroyed in return? Because thinking along these lines is even more insane than Putin and makes him look like a moderate. You’re the insane one if you think a war against Russia can be won.

@@richardb8080 you my friend are what we call a deluded wh!te clown. 🤣 🤣 If nato DOES get involved, which they won't, then remember the whole of Asia will get together including China and. Russia alone has enough nukes to obliterate the whole of the West. Nevermind the whole region. Also there in not 1 leader in the whole West that is even closely comparable with putin. They're all deluded fools. 🤣 🤣 🤣 Now back to the pub alki

Atleast people can see through this pathetic p ropaganda

I somehow doubt that, considering it has only been occupied for a few months, and the Russians flattened just about every village and town before they occupied them in the first place. But facts are a strange concept to you bots aren't they? Go back under your rock why don't you.

@@BruceLee-pr1md the majority of people believe it without question.

The Americans own Ukraine.

Grade A hopium.

Are you high?

@@MrB1923 not at all

@@MrB1923 Why not Igor ? ( or is that Sasha ?. Or Oleg ? or may be Voldemor Puta ? )

NATO wouldn't respond with a nuke, it would send troops in to recapture Ukraine and then head straight to Moscow.

@@fancyhat6505 yea I think they would, If NATO tries take even a kilometre of Russia, then you know that Armageddon gonna start.

Pretty sure the US has developed MKV's multiple kill vehicles to target nukes in the atmosphere when launched+ US navy has some anti nuclear capibility within its navy, like a missile I forgot the name of, might be the sparrow but probably not as they'd be used to hit more planes

@@privateer7766 yea I know what your talking, the US’ anti-ICBM programme isn’t the best, partly due to the fact that many ICBM’s have advanced technologies to avoid such things, unless the US is hiding something big like a laser satellite then the US doesn’t really have much power when it comes to defending against more advanced Russian nukes. And don’t even get me started on them hypersonic missiles they are trying to build.

Classic fake news nonsense

Honestly, it's embarrassing that people fall for this crap.

@@gp5078 way beyond embarrassing. Absolutely tragic.

😂

@@TheB1nary you wouldn't be laughing if it was your family that had been killed

Don’t care Iraq isn’t even a real country only western country’s have any matter or importance the rest are training grounds and money pits in my eyes

ok Bot

Lots of irrelevant detail. Ukraine is a sovereign nation and whatever history has occurred is irrelevant as this is not a justification for invading a country today. Hang on, i'm arguing with a BOT, WTF am I wasting my time for?

Yeah ok bot

🤣❗️

@@bbcisaids6727 probably not a bot, definitely an NPC.

"Wacky ideas such as free speech" You call someone else a Nazi?

you gonna specify what the lies are or just make claims with zero evidence

If it’s not Ukrainian, why did it need to be (illegally) annexed by an external force? Numpty.

@Swift BMF He's talking about Ukraine not Russia. Putin is moving exactly like Hitler lmao

@@xzlemin9569 and Zelenskyy is acting exactly like Hitler did, your point?

Glory to the corrupt NATO/EU and US bootlicking globalists?? 😂 wakey wakey, Putin is the only man standing up for Europe against WEF dogs.

hahahahahehehehehehe...yeah sure bubba.

Including the Ukrainian Nazi's?

No, they’ve already spoken with senior analysts who have indicated that if Putin were to use a nuke, the West would not retaliate with one BUT they would literally flatten the Russian army with a massive bombardment of conventional weapons, making it impossible for them to win the war

There would definitely be action from at least the US and possibly UK

Sosig, you couldn’t be more wrong. You are either Naïve or a Putin poodle testing the water. Every ex soviet country applies for nato membership because of fear for imperialist Russian abuse, using nukes will bring America into your war, and the Americans will let loose on everything they have, which after seeing Russias military performance in Ukraine, is far more powerful and advanced

False. He would only say, we were fighting against this to not to come true! But the West defeated the wrong enemy! Now enjoy communism from west to east, fourth time! 1917 Russia, 1920's Weimar Germany, 1945 Half Europe! 2014 Ukraine! The real enemy is the banking industry funded communism! Yepp 1917 is the landmark! The world will never forget the ritualistic massacre of the Russian Czar and his family by the same minority which .Elensky also belongs to! The forever communists are the enemy of our world! And they love seeing Europeans dead! It is a holy sacrifice for these people! Don't believe any of these words! Look into it!

It would be better to go down with Bolshevism than to live under capitalism - Goebbels.

Name checks out, Russian bot absolutely confirmed. Subverting out society isn't going to work buddy, we are stronger than you brainwashed idiots will ever be.

Ukraine can win! Ukraine must win and Ukraine will win. Allez Ukraine

@@jallowjerry9452 After 19 years since the beginning of the invasion of Iraq, has the West forgotten this war? The Iraq war is said to have resulted in 1 million deaths the difference is russia have weapons of mass destruction A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened Russia has the World's Largest Bomber As of 2022, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,977 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia has the most nuclear weapons of any country, at 6,257. Of these, 1,458 are active, meaning they are already deployed, 3,039 are available (can be deployed if needed) and 1,760 are retired (out of use and awaiting dismantlement How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world? Russia - 6,257 America 5,550 UK - 225 France - 290 China - 350 Israel - 90 Pakistan - 165 India - 156 North Korea - 40 When you tell the truth it's always gonna be controversial. USA bombing list : the democracy world tour usa nuked japan -Korea and China 1950-1953 (Korean War) -Guatemala 1954 -Indonesia 1958 -Cuba 1959-1961 -Guatemala 1960 -Congo 1964 -Laos 1964-1973 -Vietnam 1961-1973 -Cambodia 1969-1970 -Guatemala 1967-1969 -Grenada 1983 -Lebanon 1983-1984 (both lebanese and syrian targets) -Libya 1986 -Elsavador 1980s -Nicaragua 1980s -Iran 1987 -Panama 1989 -Iraq 1991 (persian gulf war) -Kuwait 1991 -Somalia 1993 -Bosnia 1994-1995 -Sudan 1998 -Afghanistan 1998 -Yugoslavia 1999 -Yemen 2002 -Iraq 1991-2003 (US/UK on reguler basis) -Iraq 2003-2015 -Afghanistan 2001-2015 -Pakistan 2007-2015 -Somalia 2007-8 and 2011 -Yemen 2009 and 2011 -Libya 2011 and 2015 -Syiria 2014-2015 Never forget who's the real threat to the world !! Who have killed more people in last two decades ? America or Russia how many people have been killed and wounded in Iraq since the 2003 United States invasion. However, we know that between 184,382 and 207,156 civilians have died from direct war related violence caused by the U.S., its allies, the Iraqi military and police, and opposition forces from the time of the invasion through October 2019. The violent deaths of Iraqi civilians have occurred through aerial bombing, shelling, gunshots, suicide attacks, and fires started by bombing. Many civilians have also been injured. Because not all war-related deaths have been recorded accurately by the Iraqi government and the U.S.-led coalition, the numbers are likely much higher. Several estimates based on randomly selected household surveys place the total death count among Iraqis in the hundreds of thousands. Several times as many Iraqi civilians may have died as an indirect result of the war, due to damage to the systems that provide food, health care and clean drinking water, and as a result, illness, infectious diseases, and malnutrition that could otherwise have been avoided or treated. The war has compounded the ill effects of decades of harmful U.S. policy actions towards Iraq since the 1960s, including economic sanctions in the 1990s that were devastating for Iraqis. Despite more than $100 billion committed to aiding and reconstructing Iraq, many parts of the country still suffer from lack of access to clean drinking water and housing. Why did Native Americans lose their land? Starting in the 17th century, European settlers pushed Indigenous people off their land, with the backing of the colonial government and, later, the fledging United States. www.science.org/content/article/native-tribes-have-lost-99-their-land-united-states

@@knowledge3563 : Who annexed most of Eastern Europe after WW2? Who tried to invade Finland? Who first invaded Afghanistan after WW2? Who keeps copying and pasting their lengthy diatribe on this thread? Who is boring the holy shit out of everyone? And,…….who thinks anyone is that interested in your rant?? 🤡