Thanks!!

damn-

@@caljucotcas ur welcome

Yep you must be as bored as I am, I was thinking of doing the same just for fun

15:51 Evergreen

Titanic and its two sister ships were almost identical, I think people tend to forget that since it is the one remembered by history and so its sort of a legend that titanic was a standout, supersized ship at its time but it wasn’t. The whole trio was the same length as shown here and Olympic came first so it was more famous if anything. But its not like Olympic was the largest ship at the time by more than a few meters anyway, look at Mauretania. Titanic was the most massive out of the three but only by a tiny margin. Olympic had been in service for a while before Titanic, in fact, it did try to reach Titanic across the Atlantic the night it sank but it was too far away. Titanic wasn’t as much a poster child as legend has it (that and the whole unsinkability myth).

@@maxonite I've actually heard the unsinkable thing came from Olympic after her service in ww1 when it was found that she was torpedoed as well as her history of ramming ships and docks. Olympic sure had an eventful and interesting career. She sure made up for her two lost sisters who never got to do much in their careers.

@@maxonite Good point. I think the biggest reason we remember Titanic is because of both who was on it and the amount of lives lost. There's so much raw lure attached to the story. The incident was completely preventable with a pair of binoculars, it split in two, the grand staircase, and the name Titanic rolls off the tongue a lot better than Britannic or Olympic.

@@maxonite Titanic (and Olympic) had a displacement of 53,147 t, Britannic had 54,300 t. She was also wider than Olympic and Titanic, (Britannic 28,65 m, Olympic/Titanic 28,1 m) so I'm not sure where you got the idea, that Titanic was the "most massive" out of the three. Britannic has always been the biggest of them and was intended to be from the beginning.

​Si certo ma ti ricordo che il britannic è stato finito dopo l'affondamento del Titanic.

They were just the closest that's all. I'm sure any ship would have done just as well on the rescue attempt. Wouldn't say a ship is the most impressive just because they got lucky being so close.

@@VykeKing Wait till you find out about the SS Californian

@@VykeKing ironically several ships were closer- they just did not get there first. If i am not mistaken California, Virginian, Mount Temple and Fredrick were closer. Not only that Carpathia had to pass through the Ice flow to get to Titanic while the other ships did not

@MrChickennugget360 Well shoot thanks for the lesson.. That's so unfortunate considering more people could have been saved alot earlier.

@@VykeKing The closest ship was nearly within visual range. They saw the Titanic's flares but the Titanic's crew had only been able to find the white "celebration" flares, not the red "emergency" flares, so it just looked to them like the Titanic was having a party.

Without mast included in the measurement of the height, What height is the tallest ship ever built?

It literally hurts watching these three sisters standing side by side are now resting in oceans bed😢

​@@thatyoutubebinger Well, only the titanic and britannic are resting on the ocean floor

@@thatyoutubebinger no the olympic was scrapped

Who are the 3 sisters? can you explain that🤔

​@yks2024all-star they are Rms Olympic, Titanic and Britannic.

@@TheScottishBOLSHEVIK why these ships are named as 3sisters?

@yks2024all-star you know why. But anyways, because they were built as a trio of oceanliners for the whitestar line by Hardland and Wolf in Belfast, Northern Irealnd. They were designed for luxury and prestige and to dominate the transatlantic passenger trade due to competition. The idea behind the Trio of Oceanliners was so they could operate like a bus schedule. One ship could be in Southampton, the other in the mid Alantic, and the other in NYC or also in the mid-Atlantic, providing a reliable, fast service from the UK to France.

@@TheScottishBOLSHEVIK I thought that their names come from real 3 sisters at first,thanks mate

Not really. Most of the ships here are still afloat and in service or as a museum ship. Some were scrapped, not sunk.

Estonia or Titanic for example

​@@erior2180 don't forget Sewol!

@@MiniMC546 or in construction.

After Estonia, the same thought came to my mind.

2 sank before having a career and 1 was scrapped due to the Depression. If the Great Depression never hit Olympic would have lasted longer as the floating hotel and cafe she was meant to be used as in France.

@@crazyguy_1233 speaking about floating hotels, 7:41

.

But Olympic never sank

​@@heechanglim5325 it was scrapped I think

The South Korean government was so worried about their country's public image that they refused help from other countries nearby, what an absolute joke. Cowardly and shameful.

There's video of kids sitting in their cabins playing the Titanic music on their phones while the ship was sinking. They trusted that the crew knew what they were doing and that the situation wasn't serious, just like third class passengers on the Titanic who were never told of the situation. Let that be a lesson - if something goes wrong when you're on a ship, just get on deck, no matter what you hear from the crew.

@@CaptainFalcoyd exactly. In one of the videos by the children, one of them was comparing it to a movie they had seen. They had said something like, “Is it going to be like this movie I saw where the only people that live are the ones that disobey?” I feel bad for the parents who had told there children to listen and obey to the crew’s instructions, especially since the blue house kept covering the situation up and pretending that everything was going okay and as planned. Whenever a ship sinks, my advice would to be to trust yourself, trust your gut and your own capabilities. Those children knew something was wrong, and they all wanted to leave but they stayed, it was truly heartbreaking.

I didn't know the ship by name but I remember the sinking. Just an absolute mess all around. The only US vessel that could respond was the Bonhomme Richmond, a Wasp class Amphibous assault ship. The ROK denied it permission to use it's helicopters in the rescue. That really pisses me off because a Wasp class was probably the best ship the US has to aid a sinking vessel. It was built to deploy and recover around 1000 marines with helicopters and boats...and it was told to stand down. Whatever faults my country has, I don't doubt for a second the sailors and marines on the Richmond would gladly risked their lives to save kids from a shipwreck.

Hxghu con

Some may be different from each other But they sail together And Will be remembered forever

Mate, don't. I already anthropomorphise these ships enough. 😂

​@@giorgospapoutsakis5271subnautica reference?

@@witchynerdhermit a man of culture as well?

I don't think that can be applied to the Bismark and the Hood as those two battled to the death.

Same with the Sewol :(

RIP? The Titanic cannot. Due to people's morbid curiosity.

@@iconicshrubbery The Titanic is resting. Would you rather the world's "morbid curiosity" fade away and the ship be forgotten except by ship nerds like everyone here? Then the entire tragedy be repeated by similar foolishness when history repeats itself?

costa sinking 2012 was a PLANNED LUCIFERIAN EVENT....JUST LIKE TITANIC 1912, IT WAS A "centenial aniversary" gift....😮😮😮😳

The Sewol was even worse, look it up.

Sewol: ………

@@hxmestasiis It's not a competition... the tragedy of the Sewol is not so much about the loss of life (although terrible) and more about the absurd actions taken across ALL levels across the authorities handling the situation. That's why it's such a frustrating case I think.

Here you need to understand that by this moment it has been like 4 years, a purely military ship, a military transport, a base for submariners. military barracks. And of course, no one told anyone that this time this ship was carrying 10 thousand refugees, of which only 1.5 thousand soldiers. No designations. Attacks by submarines, against military ships, went there regularly. Minefields were exposed. submarines sailed. War zone. By the way. The military saved in relative terms is 2 times more than civilians. But here you need to understand. no discrimination, they were trained and disciplined and better prepared for tragedy.

"Civilians" hmm... Yes. Almost all of them where atleast NAZI sympathizers, so I don't feel _as_ bad.

Yeah they were absolutely tiny for the task that they accomplished.

It was a small ship even for the time. Partly because Columbus couldn't really choose anything better, partly because small ships resist structural stresses much better. By comparison, 1500 years earlier, the Romans routinely used 30-35m cargo ships. The largest documented was 55m long.

Also laid the first lasting Trans-Atlantic telegraph line which allowed Europe and the Americas to talk at a much easier and faster way.

Where in the video is that

4:47

@Tran Bao Nam even the Britannic is a legend.

No 7:26 and 8:17😁

@Tran Bao Nam Olympic has had so much happen during her career. Definitely deserves more attention

All the ships here are angry, they want to eliminate the titanic from history

​@@pjoter5398 মারাত্মক

Olympic, Titanic, Britannic, Lusitania, Mauretania and Aquitania are probably the biggest proof of how beautiful four stackers Ocean Liners were

She didn't sink because of hubris. She sank because she hit an iceberg. White Star Line never called her unsinkable. The newspapers just like to victim blame.

I second that option, it was a great video, and as a ship guy, I really appreciated the amount of work, but Lizzie deserves some love.

I was about to say the same thing

Isn't this video about length? What do you mean by large?

@@theresiakreutzer3829 Obviously Lizzie was longer than many of the smaller ships that were included. A large ship is certainly long as well.

I mean they "missed" a LOT of ships. I didn't see an Iowa or a Nimitz or a Typhoon, for example (all classes that in my mind would warrant inclusion). But of course they can't include an example of every class of ship ever built, we'd be here all week just watching the video.

Yooo!! 😅

Yoooooo❤

@rituthakur9608It Is A Ship

Very close.....I was hoping to see the Olympic, and I wasn't disappointed!

I came to see voyager on the list but they didn't have it

It’s interior was the difference. It was beyond more luxurious to her competition when she launched. Titanic may look insignificant, but it’s impact on shipping and safety regulations and it’s imprint on modern culture makes it anything but. I would also argue that those ships looked better compared modern cruise ships, which just look like floating glass malls with waterpark tubes sicking out. The Titanic and ships of the early 1900s have a more majestic look to them.

Ocean Liners were the primary mode of transportation before the jet age. The Titanic and her sister ships of the Olympic class were the culmination of a rapidly evolving, international race for technological and naval prestige. The _Blue Riband_ was the accolade given to the world's fastest transatlantic liners. The British were dominant, represented by the Cunard and White Star Lines. They would do away with sails, introduce electricity, plumbing, heating, etc. In 1897, Norddeutscher Lloyd launched SS Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse _(~650 Ft)._ The first _"Four Funnel"_ ocean liner of 14 that would be built in maritime history. The grand _German_ Ship _(and her later sister ships)_ stole the Blue Riband from the British. Although the Germans had taken the Blue Riband, British liners remained dominant in size. RMS Oceanic and the _Big Four_ of the White Star Line were the first liners to surpass the outdated SS _Great Eastern (1858)_ as the largest passenger ships _(~700-730 ft)_ in 1902, J. P. Morgan sought to build a maritime empire of his own, acquiring the Leyland and White Star Line, thus making the owner American. Faced with major competition, the British government would invest in the Cunard Line, under the condition that they be available for conversion into armed cruisers when needed by the navy. They were to build the two _Largest,_ and _Fastest_ liners in history: _-- RMS Lusitania_ and _RMS Mauretania,_ both of which won the Blue Riband during their respective maiden voyages at _~790 ft_ in length. The White Star line would respond with the Olympic Class, at _~880 ft_ in length. These would be the largest passenger ships in the world before the German SS Imperator went into service in June 1913. Olympic also held the title of the largest British-built liner until RMS Queen Mary was launched in 1934

It’s because the inside was next level luxurious Pretty much the grandmother of cruise type ships, but the carpentry and everything was way cooler than now imo

Later ships were also wider as well as much heavier too. Ex seaman.

The Olympic and Britannic are her sister ships.

it's kind of odd when you first see it, but the more you learn about it the more it starts to make sense, and the commitment they took with everything (except 3rd class lol) is incredibly impressive.

What's with them?

the special thing about the Titanic is its interior and style being so different to modern ships. It was basically decorated like a classical palace, while also looking rough and primitive compared to modern ships from the outside, yet at the same time very big. If the ships interior did not look like that or if it looked modern in general, nobody would care. People also having a completely different dress code, different mannerisms and behavior, and a very different mindset and also the lack modern technology associates the Titanic with a completely different world view. People are fascinated by the past because of it being functionally equivalent to an alternate reality, where the entire world and people think differently, behave differently etc. People also perceive past events as much more interesting than contemporary events, even though they arent necessarily more impactful. The Titanic being 100 years old offers that , while modern ships dont. even a more tragic accident on a bigger and more luxurious ship would never be interesting because of not offering a look into a different world or wordview. Also technology was so primitive back then that big ships and such voyages were not normal. most people had barely seen or heard anything of the world, or been on a ship, so even building and launching a huge ship would be a very uncommon sight to people with a much simpler life, who were not used to big machines everywhere, and also were not flooded with information. to them, the world was much smaller, much more mysterious, and technology in general was very new and out of the ordinary. Thats why it was so impactful to people at that time,, and why it got lots of attention by the news, and subsequently became a popular story with people at that time.

@@sshreddderr9409 The thing I love about ships of that era is the Sheer and Camber of the decks, giving them an elegant shape, Modern Cruise ships are just big slabs of white to me.

@@sshreddderr9409 That was common on ocean liners in the early 20th century. A lot of 'Olympic'/'Titanic''s interiors were enlarged versions of what has been used on earlier White Star vessels.

sshreddderr9409 I don't know who you are, but you described your thoughts about people's perception of a bygone era so coolly and objectively. Probably, it would be cool to have a discussion with you over a cup of tea 👍🤝

I worked on 4 ships that were quite a bit bigger in the early sixties. One was an oil tanker that was 55,000 tons, EMPTY! 100,000 tons loaded. 2 years after the disaster 3 German liners entered service, bigger, 54,000 tons and more luxurious. Check them out. Bismarck was one of them.

Thanks

Thank you for saving your devices life

amerigo vespucci???

Estaba buscando este comentario muchas gracias ❤

the one most famous and the legend of the sea that have died😢

There are more beautiful ships than titanic

❤️

Bismarck = 250,5 m (821 ft 10 inches) Tirpitz = 251 m :)

It says length not durability

😅

Hi! I'm Japanese. The aircraft carrier in the CG Japan is not Shokaku, but maybe Akagi or Kaga. Sorry for my poor English. I liked this video.

Shorter than the titanic

And the latest Mystar 😊

The Original Queen Elizabeth The SS Rex The Romanic The Empress of Britain And both Edgar Quinet Class ships

kayak , canoe ....

Where is USS Enterprise (CV-6)? Its only the most decorated American warship of WW II.

@@UKRAINEMapping RMS Empress of Ireland as well.

@@ohhhnooooo446 yeah sorry I forgot that

The France is shown at 6:10 in this video.

No this is SS France from 1910 (217m), he want to talk about the SS France from 1960 (316m). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_France_(1960) _« In 1960, the 316 m (1,037 ft) vessel was the longest passenger ship ever built, a record that remained unchallenged until the construction of the 345 m (1,132 ft) RMS Queen Mary 2 in 2004. »_ Et ouais mon gars !

Oceanliner🔥 👉 cruiseship💀

cheers its times like these my french gcse doesn't go to waste😂

Finally, my years of french classes were useful

was looking for this comment about the Kaga!

there is also the Harmony and Symphony of the seas

Wow😮 who cares😮

you have any idea how many ships are there in total? it the world? i dont think i miss anything. i have what i got.

@@caljucotcas best creator energy

Yes

Titanic is a largest peacetime wreck

"Wilhelm Gustloff" was a military target. There is no shame. A military vessel that has previously participated in military operations. In the war zone. Surrounded by warships in Germany. There were weapons on board. Do you want to make it a civilian hospital ship? The wild number of victims, on the conscience of not Soviet submariners, but of the German command, which exceeded all norms for passenger capacity. And initially this ship took out 1.5 thousand German military. A warship took out the military, civilians were already in addition. Soviet submariner, deservedly received the hero's award. He sank an armed warship, in combat camouflage, in a combat zone. Nobody hides anything, the depth is small, you can go there and see everything for yourself. And if you are so jarred by the death of civilians, then look at how many ships the Soviet Union lost from German torpedoes. Start with "Armenia" in 1941, in the Black Sea. The number of civilian dead is comparable to those killed on "Wilhelm Gustloff" Or maybe we'll talk about the ships "Chkalov" or "Kotovsky"? Hospital ships with a red cross that the Germans sank in front of "Armenia"? Thousands of civilians. That is, you are ashamed that they drowned a warship on which civilians accidentally turned out to be, but you don’t notice in any way that the German military sank civilian ships under the auspices of the Red Cross? It's not a problem right? It's not a shame. (sarcasm)

@@dimushka383 The Wilhelm Gustloff was a hospital ship, and it was loaded with refugees, the Soviets knew this, in fact when the Soviet Union disappeared, documents came to light that proved it, it was a genocide planned, calculated and executed. Even the rusians hid it for years and time later they torpedoed its remains so that what happened could never be known, what do you think of this? The Soviet Union also, after doing this, wanted to separate the captain so that he would not speak. Aleksandr Marinesko, the captain of the submarine, was decorated but two days later the Naval High Command of the Soviet Union represented by Nikolai Gerasimovich Kuznetsov refused to recognize Marinesko as deserving of the title of Hero of the Soviet Union, qualifying him as not compatible with the hero profile. , disqualifying him mainly due to his alcoholism, violations of the regulations and his conflictive nature. They were already trying to get rid of him for something. Marinesko was assigned to secondary jobs in the Soviet Army and a little later he was accused of squandering assets, for which he had to present his resignation and spend two years in the Kolyma concentration camp. At the end of his term, Marinesko was an absolutely broke and destitute man, and he died of an ulcer in Leningrad. As I have already said, Later, the Soviets dynamited the wreck to avoid future investigations for the war crime committed without being able to destroy it, leaving it in three sections that were discovered and filmed in 1995 by deep-sea divers. Finally, the bad of some does not make the bad of others good. This ship was torpedoed three times, it is the biggest shipwreck, it is the biggest genocide at sea in history. The Soviet Union has killed more in peacetime than Nazism in wartime, also the communist ideology is the greatest genocide ideology in history. In the European Union, its illegalization is pending for all the damage it has done and continues to do. The communist ideology should be on the same level as the Nazi ideology.

@@marie7622 No need to lie, it was a floating barracks, and a military base for submariners. He went on his campaign in combat coloring, and there were guns on board. It does not fit a hospital ship in any way and did not even have such a marking. This is a military ship that went on a campaign to remove the military, and they were loaded in the first place. There have been many investigations. including in Germany. This is a military vessel and there was no crime in it. Are you sure that 9+ thousand dead Soviet citizens on just one ship with the symbols of the red cross in the Black Sea, exactly less than on the sunken military Gustav, where out of 10.5 thousand 1.5 survived? Oh, you don't write about such things. As well as several dozen Red Cross ships sunk by the Nazis. The Soviets did not sink Red Cross ships. Are you sure you correctly identified the villains? Who informed the Soviets about the removal of 10+ thousand refugees, even if the crew itself did not know that they would be taking out so many, and even civilians? Read what applies to hospital courts, Gustav did not meet these parameters. This is a military ship, which is also recognized in Germany. Marinesko after the war really fell into disgrace, but not because of attacks on ships. and for disciplinary action. He received his award later. For his military campaigns, he was awarded the "Hero of the Soviet Union" - the highest degree of distinction in the USSR, which was awarded for accomplishing a feat or outstanding services during hostilities, as well as in peacetime, no one has withdrawn this award at the moment and is not going to remove it. Did the Soviets kill more in civilian life than the Nazis in wartime? Seriously? What yellow press are you getting this from? Show me where almost 30 million civilians died in peacetime?

@@dimushka383 I am not lying, you can look for Wilhelm Gustloff anywhere and he will tell you the same, I even encourage everyone who is reading us to do so. And I repeat, the bad of some does not make the bad of yours good. You don't have to convince me of anything, I have already said that you can read it anywhere. COMMUNISM AND THE USSR BASED THEIR IDEA ON GENOCIDE. The first was that of Holdomor in Ukraine.