Uncovering the Secrets of the International Space Station (Full Episode) | Superstructures
Переглядів 1,287,893
День томуThe International Space Station is taken apart to uncover its engineering secrets.
Enjoy a free trial of National Geographic right here: ngmdomsubs.nationalgeographic...
➡ Subscribe: bit.ly/NatGeoSubscribe
➡ Get more Nat Geo Full Episodes: • National Geographic Fu...
➡ Get more Nat Geo Wild Full Episodes: • Shark vs. Tuna (Full E...
And check out more National Geographic series and specials here:
➡ Disney Plus: on.natgeo.com/3q6on5p
➡ Hulu: on.natgeo.com/3Qor0Ko
➡ NGTV app: www.nationalgeographic.com/tv/
➡ ABC app: abc.com/
#FullEpisode #UncoveringTheSecrets #NationalGeographic
Get More National Geographic:
Official Site: bit.ly/NatGeoOfficialSite
Facebook: bit.ly/FBNatGeo
Twitter: bit.ly/NatGeoTwitter
Instagram: bit.ly/NatGeoInsta
TikTok: / natgeo
Tenor: on.natgeo.com/31b3Koc
About National Geographic:
National Geographic is the world's premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure. Through their world-class scientists, photographers, journalists, and filmmakers, Nat Geo gets you closer to the stories that matter and past the edge of what's possible.
Uncovering the Secrets of the International Space Station (Full Episode) | Superstructures
• Uncovering the Secrets...
National Geographic
/ natgeo
@rikomagyar7850 2 місяці тому
This is the way to go. Not arguing, hurting and killings on Earth.... Greetings from Australia, Perth.... //
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!!
@runechuckie 22 дні тому
It is the way to go, I wish Russia would stop it's invasion of the sovereign Ukraine. It's own brother /sister country with tons of history together. Putin needs to be stopped.
@Levelheaded_Music День тому
@@gregsimmons694 yep
@adriantcullysover4640 2 місяці тому
Those 3D models were so good, I wasn't sure what other shots were real or not.
@thankthemosthighgod9135 2 місяці тому
Getting closer to more believable imagery space
@JustinTucker208 2 місяці тому
I believe Most images of the I.S.S. Are C.G.I. Not like they’re letting have any selfie sticks long enough to take a picture of the full thing, or any astronauts going out there for pictures while flying through space at 5 miles per second.
@JoeL-qt8fn 2 дні тому
Real. China have one
@vividthespis 2 місяці тому
"ISS, we drink our own urine after recycling it..." Bear Grylls "WRITE THAT DOWN!!!"
@michelmilaneh8963 2 місяці тому
Or as they say today's coffee is tomorrow's coffee
@ginamiller269 2 місяці тому
And ? your urine today will be your coffee on the next morning ! Weather on the ISS nor on Starship when we wants to go to Mars ! Think of this ,, nothing wrong to use your urine , changing it in drinkable water. We never could bring all that water we need to the ISS or even to Mars or beyond ! Same with xygen. We have to produce it on the ISS , on the Moon and on Mars or wherever we wnats to go !
@Semicon07 2 місяці тому
Yeah it's called, "reverse osmosis". Not quite dinosaur pee...Just as "clean" - this video is so old they still state that Orion will take us "to the moon by 2022".....considering in 2024 that is still a ways off....
@vividthespis 2 місяці тому
@@Semicon07 The joke flew right over your head didn't it?
@davidmudry5622 2 місяці тому
Would a blind person bouncing on a trampoline know when they go from up to down?
@user-sg9ow5te5p 2 місяці тому
They covered two topics that I thought deserved better explanations. #1 Round versus square hatches. I'm sure each country had good reasons for their design choice. What are the pro's and con's of each design? #2 They spoke at length at how expensive it is to ship oxygen for breathing to the station. Then... lets extract the Oxygen out of H2O. Is there a water fountain in space that negates the shipping cost for water? Each pound of anything costs the same to ship, regardless of it being steel, aluminum, water or air. What factors are involved that give the oxygen extraction from water process the advantage?
@AHappySpace Місяць тому
I don't know pros and cons of square vs round hatches, thought it was just a choice as far as fitment of astronauts with their plss to get through the hole ..and iss does use electrolysis to a certain degree, not sure what percentage of air is from that but I do know it is used on iss..just my thoughts/knowledge wish I could explain more
@dylanwoodworth6676 Місяць тому
Off the top of my head, I would guess it requires far less energy to separate hydrogen from oxygen, rather than ship oxygen to recombine with hydrogen. Hydrogen has no use (the reclamation process vents the hydrogen to space) so to produce water, you'd have to ship both gasses. That's part of the consideration.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lol. International fake station!
@austinjoesph5186 Місяць тому
Wonder whether does it have any rain falling down in space?
@ankhels 2 місяці тому
Amazing & so informative. Quality all around was great. Thanks! ♥️
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@DhooomKetu 2 місяці тому
Kudos to cameraman for shooting all these videos in space
@qaesarx 5 днів тому
Better yet, kudos to all the grippers that did disassemble AND reassemble the space station with green screen suits on... IN SPACE!
@user-xf8fv5ph8m 2 місяці тому
I love it I'm watching from Manila Philippines I'm freda i love learning
@adhi.kusumo 2 місяці тому
Thank you National Geographic!! 🎉🎉🥳🥳🥳 Loved it!! it used to be Very expensive just to see your great documentary from half way around the world!! (Jakarta, Indonesia) Now, it is free on UKposts!! But, it is necessary to take note: in minutes 8:08 This Video made in 2016, This comment written 13 days after this video posted in 2024, By the time this comment written, the video is 8 years old. 🤔🤔
@chrisogonas Місяць тому
Simply incredible!
@alicewangui3288 2 місяці тому
Scientists and engineers are amazing.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up! International fake station!
@oportaldahistoria 2 місяці тому
Thank you so much. Such an amazing content. I am so grateful.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@Levelheaded_Music 2 дні тому
@@gregsimmons694 yup.
@NOM-X 2 місяці тому
The best Modern Marvel episode yet. Love It!
@steveskouson9620 2 місяці тому
Yeah, except this is Nat Geo, not Modern Marvels. steve
@macnethzone 2 місяці тому
glad you like it even tho your persons with dissability..
@jbcvabeach82 2 місяці тому
🤣🤣🤣@@macnethzone
@ultrajd 2 місяці тому
I was 10 years old when the ISS construction began. Ironically, I was also in my current events class and we watched the launch of the first American module unity on TV. One thing, though that I recently have discovered is, we’ve discovered new ways to generate energy through the use of heat. Now I’m sure they’re already working on this but instead of just taking the majority of the waste heat from the station and radiating it out into space why not try and find a way to use it to Produce more energy? I mean yes, as stated in the thing, the station creates more than enough energy through its solar panels, but I would think that it would be a good idea to try to make something that could use that heat purely because of the fact that, obviously you would want to probably have as many redundancies as you can. The same thing could be said, for the hydrogen that is created through the electrolysis. I’m sure the hydrogen could be used either as a energy source or better yet perhaps use it as a form of thruster fuel. I’m sure all of this is far easier said than done. But , you know just figured I’d put in my two cents.
@Oyya-de4co 2 місяці тому
Zk. NM
@Semicon07 2 місяці тому
More energy is never a problem. keep going mate - if anyone doubts you then THEY are the problem.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lol. International fake station
@ultrajd Місяць тому
@@gregsimmons694 Huh?
@N-e0N Місяць тому
I was born in the year 1998, so I've never known an earth without the ISS orbiting it. Gonna be a sad day when they de-orbit it in the 2030s
@michellemcsorley9221 Місяць тому
❤❤ here again it’s so much happy to view the universe from the human soul s that dream and the dream earth can share are endless ❤
@kokosensei5231 Місяць тому
Thank you for share!
@bradlycassidy-bs2dz 2 місяці тому
These guys are always reliable for a good laugh! Love it!
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Amen! International fake station!
@asiano3385 2 місяці тому
I always forget about the thing that National Geographic still use outdated measuring units and don't provide any conversions even if they are talking about science... But it is better that measuring distance in *grain of wheat* so better than nothing.
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
Yeah like Farenheit is absolutely awful, Imperial in general is moronic... 0ºC = Freezing point of H20, 100ºC = Boiling point of H20. This is so easy and logical to understand, whereas measuring things in Farenheit and yards is such a caveman thing to do..
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@Lexluthor12324 2 місяці тому
props to whoever made those 3D animations
@scottsyoutubevideos 2 місяці тому
so you saying that ISS does not exist??
@m0therfan 2 місяці тому
@@scottsyoutubevideosouter space is the biggest lie ever told.
@acertainscientificstudent1676 2 місяці тому
@@scottsyoutubevideosThough most of the video comprise real videos, there are many CGI too.I think he meant those CGI in the video
@vanishingGolem 2 місяці тому
yes, the earth is flat and we are living inside a giant peach 🍑
@davidwitt2188 2 місяці тому
I have seen the space station very clearly in my telescope. You can see the solar panels and modules very clearly. It really is up there.
@sherry14days 2 місяці тому
I just saw an object on the bottom right of screen Time @ 3:16 of video , it dropped down but went up then it veried off real fast to the right, what was that? UFO?
@whoistylerdurden1652 2 місяці тому
Im surprised nobody is commenting about it
@saravanank1659 2 місяці тому
Excellent information about space science
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!!
@mouktarhassan1971 2 місяці тому
Thank you for sharing with us
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@ftaveras73 День тому
Humans can be so creative. Thumbs up from Earth!
@herculydia 20 днів тому
Imagine working on the Space Station for 3 years and just wanting to sit under a tree in the warm sunny spring with a butterfly going by.
@tonymers 2 місяці тому
National Phonographic at it's finest...doesn't get old...
@NKWrites-jn7fn Місяць тому
interesting and informative. thanks
@AerialWaviator 2 місяці тому
This video appears to be almost 10 years old (guessing from ~2016). As of 2024, the ISS only have 5-6 more years of useful life remaining. By 2028 new (commercial) space stations will begin to take over its purpose in LEO. NOTE: just about every rocket shown in this video has been retired and replaced by newer more advanced launch vehicles. The cool thing is the cost of lifting mass to LEO has dropped from $10,000 in 1998 to under $1000 in 2024. Within a few years the new Starship booster will be able to launch structures the size of ISS in just a couple of launches, not the more than 20 SpaceShuttle launches required for ISS. Comparing ISS launched pre-2000 to Tiangong space station launch in 2021 shows how far human space flight has come. All the wires and cabling seen on ISS does not exist on Tiangong, as computers now use wireless technologies. Hard to believe that ISS was launched at the dawn of the internet age. What replaces ISS in 2030's will be even more amazing. Multiple commercial space stations are planned and currently under development.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up! International fake station!
@user-qr5vb3vm6e 2 місяці тому
The wagonwheel design is still the centrifuge gravity works and allows for a central area to accommodate the attachment of resupply shipping craft. Later, it could grow food in space,with artificial gravity gardens composting the tailings from minerals mined from the asteroid belt.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. International fake station!
@GabrielSBarbaraS 2 місяці тому
Since SpaceX began flying the Falcon 9 rocket in 2009, the cost of launch per pound has decreased from $10,000 per kilogram to roughly $2,500. Starship promises to lower the cost of launch even further.
@korana6308 2 місяці тому
That's not true.
@ginamiller269 2 місяці тому
This is already a old documentation.
@stephenskinner4857 2 місяці тому
I was part of the original design team. It was way more pound per launch than what you stated. It was $11,000 per pound. Converting kilograms of 2.2/ 1 = an aprox. cost of slightly under $4600/pound. It was way more than that. The project went over budget that drove 3 iterations and eventually more international partners to make happen. That's whyy the final design was named the International Space Station. - Stephen Skinner
@GabrielSBarbaraS 2 місяці тому
Good information Steve@@stephenskinner4857
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. It's faked. International fake station!
@andrewbock3203 2 місяці тому
Excellent! Thank you so much for posting!
@user-ff8fp8zp6z Місяць тому
❤❤❤❤❤From the PHILIPPINES
@user-kg5ut5fc1f 2 місяці тому
Thank you
@lyncolin 2 місяці тому
So how was it set in that fast motion and does the additional weight when a new module is introduced affect the overall speed?
@DistinctiveBlend 2 місяці тому
When a new module is brought up it is already traveling at the same speed
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
There is no air resistance therefore adding additional mass does nothing to slow it down.
@PaulTaka123 5 днів тому
What kind of experiments are done in space, and what benefit have they had for their respective countries
@Peter-jx3ie 4 дні тому
@PaulTaka. There's all types of science done. Some that come to mind are medicine based, the effects of zero g in construction, how different animals ( usually insects, mice ..) handle and breed in zero g, how bacterial and viruses behave, etc. Probably good to check out some channels relating to that or type in your questions. 👍
@JamesPetrycia-zj7yq Місяць тому
If something breaks they can get in few days to replace, but if you travel Mars they are out luck if something breaks. Example of Eagle going to the moon when they had damaged.
@asimally9468 2 місяці тому
AWESOME DOC ...
@SILENT-SKY900 Місяць тому
Watching from Philippines
@Budgiecastle-yr9mp 2 місяці тому
Love from Budgie Castle ♥️
@erastusmuigai8945 26 днів тому
Crazy crazy creative
@user-rp8db1ly1f 15 днів тому
Listen, world, universe, planet whatever you are, we need more than that
@MathewAkoto 13 годин тому
lol
@StingrayMM20 Місяць тому
Genuine question: I can't imagine that the inflatable module has the same kind of layering as the rigid structures on ISS. How is it being protected against the impact of debris? Thanks!
@dansv1 11 днів тому
Multiple layers of flexible Kevlar type fabric and closed-cell vinyl polymer foam according to Wikipedia. Bigelow Expandable Activity Module (BEAM).
@nothanksmate 2 місяці тому
Be cool if you told us this documentary is 5 years old. Getting up to date info on human achievement is difficult if organisations such as National Geographic don't tell us how old the information is.
@rikomagyar7850 2 місяці тому
Can you update it..?...?
@jamesnewton5134 2 місяці тому
Have they replaced the ISS in the last 5 years?
@nothanksmate 2 місяці тому
@@jamesnewton5134 Nah, it hasn't been replaced. There's no new modules or tech. Thankfully science never changes so I guess we're safe.
@ell-ell-ell 2 місяці тому
😂Боится, что забудет Не Вспомнить и торопится отказаться от Прошлого! Как можно жить с этим? Не хочется поменять или полная амнезия?
@marekkos3513 2 місяці тому
19:43 you should use BeamNG for that 🤣🤣
@SpitSharp 2 місяці тому
Good one😂😂😂
@BETORAMIREZ664 9 днів тому
min 7:40 A donde tan peinada. Dime donde trabajas y que saves hacer. Wonderful documentary. The price of living inside that mansion is out of this world.
@ranjanjoshi3454 28 днів тому
Lovely cooperation
@RV4aviator 2 місяці тому
Expand forth I say with Technology as our bedrock. We are , despite naysayers, a technology based and driven species. From the earliest attempts at tools, language, and expansion, we sought to explore...! We have succeeded better than any other on this Planet. Now is the time to test ourselves once more and explore the Solar System and beyond.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. International fake station!
@Jayjay-qe6um 2 місяці тому
In January 2022, NASA announced a planned date of January 2031 to de-orbit the ISS using a deorbit module and direct any remnants into a remote area of the South Pacific Ocean.
@darrylgadwa683 Місяць тому
@time 3:18 looks like an object passes by.
@AT-SOI Місяць тому
If you look elsewhere in the frame, you will see other objects flying from the station, such as garbage or ice.
@martinmendez5856 Місяць тому
Yes, a grey object/orb... and then it seems to change course at a different pace. Are they sattelites?
@arunlingam2531 2 місяці тому
It looks wonderful and awesome. 1 of marvel creation of human beings.
@XBnPC Місяць тому
Really well done. I knew quite a bit about the ISS before, but this has certainly been educational 😃
@johnkrywicki 6 днів тому
Awesome history!
@TommieTubbs-iv9cn Місяць тому
I think it's interesting and I would go on it.that would be fun❤
@Chill.ego. 2 місяці тому
What is the music at 10:10
@tarter9768 2 місяці тому
When did this first air???
@leedavid5214 2 місяці тому
As a technology channel, could you please use metric system?
@salt_liqueur 2 місяці тому
nat geo is an American network lol so they dont care about the rest of the world
@Gurumeierhans 2 місяці тому
They are Murican, they dont know logical units
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
100% agree. Imperial is the cause of all engineering disasters.
@NKWrites-jn7fn Місяць тому
🥰*_اِهۡدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الۡمُسۡتَقِيۡمَۙ*_🌻 ❤*_ہم کو سیدھا راستہ چلا،_🍿🦚🌸🌿*
@GodenClark 17 днів тому
This is so interesting
@Ielts_9_holder 28 днів тому
I love ❤️ national geographic
@nothanksmate 2 місяці тому
34:58 This is actually the The Wolowitz Zero-Gravity Waste Disposal System.
@vanishingGolem 2 місяці тому
bazinga!
@user-pz2ph6iy9v 2 місяці тому
23:07 what about space junk hitting the windows in the ISS or those solar panels? What's protecting those important equipment?
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
MCC HOuston , MCC ESA-Oberpfaffenhofen and Cologne, CSA Canada, JAXA and MCC Roscosmos/Moscow are observing 24/7 the orbit where the ISS is operating in LEO. When therfe is danger for the ISS astronauts because of space debris , all the space agewnties are alarming the ISS to go in action especially Roscosmos will put the ISS via the cargo Progress spacecraft in a differenht orbit etc. The ISS is observed with millionbs of eyes from ground !
@easternyellowjacket276 2 місяці тому
Excellent presentation of the incredibly important ISS.
@Dazza13Bravo Місяць тому
Not really
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. International fake station!
@abhisharma2970 2 місяці тому
thanks national geographic for always making amzaing video
@bradenrogers7190 2 місяці тому
Always enjoy watching videos like this.
@Dazza13Bravo Місяць тому
Guess you vote for Biden.
@bradenrogers7190 Місяць тому
@@Dazza13Bravo thanks
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@PaulADAigle 2 місяці тому
They expel the hydrogen as a waste product after separating it from the oxygen in water. Why can't they use that expelled as a way to make adjustments to move the ISS? Maybe they do, but consider it less than a reason to explain it?
@karstentopp 2 місяці тому
To burn hydrogen, you need to compress it. Compressing hydrogen is hard. Compressor equipment is heavy. And, most importantly, to burn hydrogen, you need oxygen.... No, hydrogen is just waste.
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
@@karstentopp That's true but who said anything about burning hydrogen? Even without combusting it you could still use it as a propulsive gas.
@karstentopp 2 місяці тому
@@TThoMusic No. The impulse wold be ridicuoulsly small. To get anything remotely useful, you would need a heavy gas - not Hydrtogen, which is incredibly light - and at high pressure, whioch you will not have without a heavy compressor and a very heavy pressure tank. Rockets get by this by cooling Hydrogen until it is liquid and then use this high pressure liquid Hydrogen to burnit with liquid Oxygen. Liquifying H2 is energy intensive (and did I mention.. heavy?), something you don't have onboard ISS. Sorry, that H2 is just waste. Oh, and did I mention, that you need a bloody lot of hydrogen and oxygen to do useful things. The main tank for the shuttle was all storage for liquid H2 and O2 ...
@victorthomas5464 2 місяці тому
How do they continue to get oxygen? Wouldnt they run out of water?
@karstentopp 2 місяці тому
@@victorthomas5464 the ISS is reusing the air. They bind CO2 chemically and they only have to replace the actual used oxygen. Water is a waste in many processes and when you split H2O into H2 and O2, you minimise the waste, too. But humans not only … erm … urinate, they also exhale a lot of water.
@Esarjay 2 місяці тому
I’m still laughing at what he said @5:50 😭😭
@Jamaicanboi407 2 місяці тому
how did they get the first air up there...?
@Shi-Pu-Den 2 місяці тому
Jared owen channel explains it.
@nickhowatson4745 2 місяці тому
pressurized air tanks. Today, around 95%-97% of the ISS's atmosphere is recycled, 5% or less is kept topped up by the onboard air supply
@PabloDonChege 2 місяці тому
There is a part two of this.?oh God😮
@Dazza13Bravo Місяць тому
Yes America as a communist country.
@hoofhearted5102 Місяць тому
3:17 What is that object that turns 90°
@jovi8295 Місяць тому
looks like an object going down then shoots up to the other direction
@AT-SOI Місяць тому
No. It is not the same object. One goes one way and one goes the other. Look carefully, it is not the same object that changes direction. The first disappears out of the frame below, then quikly the other appears. If you look elsewhere in the frame, you will see other objects flying from the station, such as garbage or ice.
@mayandas9581 2 місяці тому
Best discovery sar
@simpledragon 2 місяці тому
Ancient advanced civilizations made amazing things with stone. The difference between the pyramids and the space station is a testament to our evolution. Will we be able to make the choices for the survival of our species?
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. It's faked. International fake station!
@korana6308 2 місяці тому
The question is though, will those inflatable modules be able to withstand an impact from a micro meteorite.
@Dazza13Bravo Місяць тому
If not it must be Trump's fault, lol!
@pilotdave9442 2 місяці тому
Why no mention of the other more important half of "making air" ? CO2 mitigation. Could it be the same NASA hubris that lost us two shuttles and almost Apollo 13?
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
They use scrubbers that contain Lithium Carbonate which reacts with the CO2 to form O2 gas.
@Ryan-mq2mi 2 місяці тому
What is that at about 3:17 to 3:19? A shadow? An object?
@mrmissdestiny5953 2 місяці тому
The UFO, which by the way suddenly turned 90 degrees from the ISS, and they immediately changed the filming position...
@Ryan-mq2mi 2 місяці тому
@@mrmissdestiny5953 I think it's a shadow
@Ryan-mq2mi 2 місяці тому
or an artifact of the camera, something on the lens. Or the glass they are looking through. You can see it moves with the camera. There's also smudges that, while they look different because they don't fully block the view, move the same way
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
a pink colored elephant flying with the ISS.. LOL...
@victorthomas5464 2 місяці тому
Where do they get the water?
@youtubeconnollyfamily Місяць тому
Awesome video
@davidburch1508 18 днів тому
Satellite engage on top optic captivity orbitalalpus. 2:41 1 Trillion Second bi second hand via 80 of 21 century 1.10.02.\4.5 by second in second hand aprosthropyfleet engage by l ferit central degrade 7:13 3:03 Data energy exchange load .0.01.x2 hand ™ unch velocity
@Krishnakumar5251 2 місяці тому
Wow
@gorgonbert 2 місяці тому
I was surprised that hydrogen from the oxygen production (electrolysis) is dumped overboard… there’s got to be some use for it 🤔
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
I thought the same thing...
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
they're actually able to turn it back into water! The hydrogen is combined with carbon dioxide (that the astronauts and cosmonauts breathe out) to produce water and methane.
@TarmanTheChampion 2 місяці тому
16:19 hahaha looks like a tie fighter
@steveskouson9620 2 місяці тому
"...these thrusters, we can think of them, as tiny rockets." BRILLIANT! Just brilliant. You know, those thrusters, ARE rocket engines! steve
@ictforallth 2 місяці тому
❤❤❤❤❤
@MrBucketlist 2 місяці тому
I just watched the movie I.S.S....perfect timing.
@mtradz 2 місяці тому
Yes what a waste of time the movie sucked
@senlinkstechnologies Місяць тому
Share link
@edwinlipton Місяць тому
Wonder if there in violation of Building codes. Did they even apply for a Permitt when they started in 1998? Where is the Master Contract Plumber and Electricians Lic from??? Rouge builders
@UnderTakerSN1 11 годин тому
😂
@OppaiSensei 2 місяці тому
When they drink water, how does water flow through the body?
@creedorian 2 місяці тому
u dont need gravity for funtions of body heart pumps blood and other stuff around the body without gravity
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
It's faked. Wake up. International fake station!
@themyself1212 20 днів тому
Watching From Earth
@LaurentinoVasquez-mw5cu Місяць тому
I'm seeing it from here 😊
@luisjrmatos Місяць тому
MIR station, predecessor to the ISS was in orbit in 1986.
@martinjohnson4632 2 місяці тому
So at that speed, and something hit the glass and made a 5/8 shatter mark? 5 miles per second, just wondering what that clear glass made of?
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
The windows on the Cupola have 7 layers. The windows are made from some acrylic like the windows on an airplane which has 3 layers.
@playgirl7305 2 місяці тому
Why is the hydrogen discarded into space after getting oxygen from the water? Is it not also a source of renewable energy?
@annarimovska 2 місяці тому
Awesome 👍❤️🍀 ....happy a wonderful new week in healthy ☕🙏
@troyqueen9503 2 місяці тому
Submarines and spacecraft.😮
@TommieTubbs-iv9cn Місяць тому
I see it sometimes when it's orbiting up then down like the Blimp
@Howoldareweanywayyipes 23 дні тому
I've seen it on my many walks... back when I could walk.
@DanielMasawi-fl4gr 2 місяці тому
WOW!!!Impressive it just dawned on me,we could go to the moon of further in this,i mean imagine the distance it cover around.Just sayin loving the show from Zimbabwe
@waqas5300 2 місяці тому
One Question: as mentioned that ISS orbits earth every 90 minutes, then while astronauts fixing the Amonia leakage why threy are not experiencing that movement of 26000 miles an hour ?
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
Everything connected with the ISS is flying same speed.
@itsavi077 25 днів тому
There is just a tiny bit of atmosphere so they don’t feel wind. And the move at a constant speed wich you can’t feel if you don’t accelerate or decelerate. All of us move with the earth around the sun and with the sun around the galaxy probably way faster than the relative speed of the iss and we can’t feel the speed either.
@fasteddy6170 Місяць тому
So HILARIOUS
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Amen! God bless you! International fake station!
@TThoMusic 2 місяці тому
The ISS needs propulsion to stay in orbit... why not use the hydrogen gas to power thruster, rather than just throwing it away into space? It might not be sufficient to fully power the ISS, but surely it could supplement some of it...
@ginamiller269 Місяць тому
The thrusters aren't made for hydrogen gas !
@RustedNuts86 2 місяці тому
Its too bad its coming down soon😢
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
Lmao. Wake up. International fake station!
@LeonardojavierMellaretamal Місяць тому
❤❤❤❤ Leonardo Javier Chile Curicó
@mohamedbaza9573 Місяць тому
Have a nice day my dear friends. All my best wishes for you.
@gregsimmons694 Місяць тому
International fake station!
@JeremyDWilliamsOfficial 2 місяці тому
@National Geographic You really need to do a full length edit. This has been edited for commercial breaks, which is really annoying. It's also too dumbed down for any real space enthusiast. Otherwise, thanks for the upload.
@ell-ell-ell 2 місяці тому
всегда хорошего мало
@erastusmuigai8945 26 днів тому
Its a mazing
National Geographic
Переглядів 2,9 млн
Filmegator
Переглядів 1,4 млн
Супер Стас
Переглядів 4,5 млн
National Geographic
Переглядів 1,7 млн
National Geographic
Переглядів 1,5 млн
BBC Earth Science
Переглядів 6 млн
Влад Закроев
Переглядів 8 млн
Крінж Жопіль
Переглядів 259 тис.