US Army Unveils Potent Successor to ATACMS in Recent Testing

  Переглядів 301,498

Military TV

Military TV

Місяць тому

The U.S. Army's ATACMS, recognized as the pinnacle of modern precision strike artillery, has long been a stalwart force. Yet, in the ever-evolving landscape of military technology, what proves effective today may not suffice tomorrow. Recognizing this, the Army is forging ahead with the development of a cutting-edge long-range weapon-the Precision Strike Missile, or PrSM-an innovation poised to succeed the aging ATACMS.
Recent demonstrations of the ATACMS's ability on the Ukrainian battlefield, where it played a pivotal role in a successful strike against Russia's helicopter fleet, mark a significant achievement. Yet, this success prompts a forward-looking perspective. The baton is poised to be passed, bringing with it the anticipation of even greater capabilities and strategic advantages in the ever-shifting dynamics of modern warfare. This development makes us wonder; what advantages does the new Precision Strike missile offer?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

КОМЕНТАРІ: 371
@familypowergroup
@familypowergroup 21 день тому
We might have to send a couple of these to Ukraine for field testing
@ssaini5028
@ssaini5028 16 днів тому
it will be destroyed just like every other US weapon system in Ukraine
@bigolboomerbelly4348
@bigolboomerbelly4348 15 днів тому
Blyat!
@marco_0599
@marco_0599 12 днів тому
...couple of hundred.
@hartman12349
@hartman12349 12 днів тому
Uz se stalo , 6 bylo vypusteno , a 6 sestreleno Ruskem , vsichni zbrojari maji radost protoze se budou vydelavat velike penize , to je asi tak vsechno .
@Spearhead45
@Spearhead45 12 днів тому
Why? Look at you trying to get a couple likes by mentioning Ukraine because you don't like Russia. lmao do you want to explain to me why Russia's had major success in jamming American made gps guided munitions? Would you like to explain why Russia is able to take territory continuously while Ukraine is retreating? funding can be shored up Manpower cannot. the manpower shortage is Ukraine's problem and Ukraine's problem only. now that we know nato troops will never deploy to Ukraine because Ukraine will never be nato then we should also know Russia is going to take over Ukraine
@PanioloBee
@PanioloBee 29 днів тому
A 300+ mile range will be a benefit in the Pacific Theater.
@dirtfarmer7472
@dirtfarmer7472 25 днів тому
Yes, China certainly does not want this to be developed & deployed ROK could put china in a bad spot, where I think they need to be.
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 24 дні тому
Well, the PrSM Missiles have a range of up to 650 km... And they're working on extending that range even more. With chinese navy in mind...
@joec7724
@joec7724 21 день тому
Google "MRC Typhon Philippines"
@mcblaze1968
@mcblaze1968 20 днів тому
@@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 PrSM probably now has a range close to 750km. They won't say but they mentioned easily beating 500km during testing.
@CapybaraPlatypus
@CapybaraPlatypus 17 днів тому
Indeed
@chris-vn6sw
@chris-vn6sw 22 дні тому
When 1990’s technology can destroy Russian 2024 “Air defence” 🤔
@isn0t42
@isn0t42 7 днів тому
Nice cope.
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 7 днів тому
You can jam GPS, but you can't jam inertial guidance.
@neiltitmus9744
@neiltitmus9744 7 днів тому
Yes but that's 1960 stuff with new stickers on it
@BBBrasil
@BBBrasil 21 день тому
Nice closing argument. PRSM might accelerate provisioning Ukraine with ATACMS.
@TrevorSachko
@TrevorSachko 18 днів тому
We got the long range version last month....
@monmouthnj
@monmouthnj 18 днів тому
I figured that this is why they gave the Ukrainians a batch at the end of March. US Army logistics people were planning the decommissioning of oldest batches. So, they figured that it's better to give those old missiles to Ukrainians. It can't hurt. Actually, it worked out great.
@i-love-space390
@i-love-space390 17 днів тому
@@monmouthnj Personally, I think Biden should bypass Congress altogether and hire the Ukrainians as contractors to decommission older batches of weapons. We have to pay companies to decommission out of date weapons - a fact that the people bitching about "handouts" to Ukraine just don't understand. They are truly idiots. We are replacing everything sent to Ukraine with newer weapons, built by AMERICAN companies, sending all the expenditures back into the US economy.
@pat-orl
@pat-orl 14 днів тому
@@monmouthnj Yes, Lockheed stopped making new ATACMS close to a year ago
@monmouthnj
@monmouthnj 14 днів тому
@@pat-orl They started making PrSM instead. First batch has been delivered in December last year. So, in theory they can "pass" 2000 or so of ATACMS to Ukraine.
@Alphasig336
@Alphasig336 11 днів тому
US already had 1800 Expired ATACMS and several thousand still active.
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 12 днів тому
"But ATACMS was already perfect!" "I know. But we can always make it MORE perfect!"
@christophermartin8366
@christophermartin8366 7 днів тому
never underestimate the desire for an engineer to say "Hold my beer"
@BlackEpyon
@BlackEpyon 7 днів тому
@@christophermartin8366 Especially when you've got a Congress who likes their military to be two decades ahead of everybody else.
@gmnotyet
@gmnotyet 4 дні тому
@@christophermartin8366 Yep, increased range and increased payload and increased speed makes it more perfect.
@bobburich1667
@bobburich1667 28 днів тому
This is a great addition for the ARMY.
@paladin0654
@paladin0654 28 днів тому
Ukraine wont acquire PrSM because the US won't make it available to them. This missile is in early stage of production and is required by US units.
@charlesrichardson8635
@charlesrichardson8635 24 дні тому
Yes, until PrSM is available in big numbers it is for the US, BUT that means as PrSM are available ATACMS can be shifted to Ukraine.
@paladin0654
@paladin0654 23 дні тому
@@charlesrichardson8635 Maybe.
@BeerGutGuy
@BeerGutGuy 21 день тому
US and Australia…..
@JinKee
@JinKee 21 день тому
@@charlesrichardson8635gotta finish dinner before desert
@charlesrichardson8635
@charlesrichardson8635 21 день тому
@@JinKee Not sure what means. The US is going to start churning out the PrSM as ATACMS are coming to the end of their lives, which is another reason to get them to Ukraine. So if dinner is ATACMS the US is going for desert.
@bradolsen8629
@bradolsen8629 28 днів тому
Hooray to the red white and blue
@kenthanna
@kenthanna 21 день тому
Send it.
@mbompenza7082
@mbompenza7082 8 днів тому
@@kenthannapoproshaika😂😂😂
@wekker090
@wekker090 21 день тому
I say combat testing in Ukraine..
@alex-fs5bl
@alex-fs5bl 14 днів тому
Indeed...
@jeremiahjohnson7515
@jeremiahjohnson7515 11 днів тому
@@alex-fs5bl 1/2 the reason.
@riparianlife97701
@riparianlife97701 11 днів тому
With LRASM, too. Russia still has a few more ships.
@keeperofthecheese
@keeperofthecheese 10 днів тому
Unlikely. They wouldnt want Russia capturing new tech if it didnt go off.
@mbompenza7082
@mbompenza7082 8 днів тому
I say not gonna help
@xz2bzy804
@xz2bzy804 12 днів тому
Advising the United States Army to not abandon those ATACMS missiles because in war, the range those ATACMS provide have proven it worth and value
@UnitedUA
@UnitedUA 29 днів тому
PrSM is going to win for sure! 🤘
@AkshayKumar-vg2pi
@AkshayKumar-vg2pi 28 днів тому
iskander is far better than this and russinas have lots and lots of it
@hanshuber1875
@hanshuber1875 28 днів тому
@@AkshayKumar-vg2pi bs. And russia isnt producing anything the world cant buy anywhere else. Russia has no high tech industry. Even those iskander missiles are made with western parts. so dont tell bs here.
@ThePorkchop1787
@ThePorkchop1787 28 днів тому
@@AkshayKumar-vg2pi It's a different kind of missile. Iskander isn't supplied to field commanders and is twice the size and 6 times the weight. Atacms is a quick deployable tactical missile and Iskander is a short range strategic missile. You can’t rapidly fire one as an enemy target present itself, instead you plan for them to be fired as part of coordinated missile salvos against fixed targets like power supplies, factories or apartment blocks.
@ramnivdc7051
@ramnivdc7051 27 днів тому
Tornado-S can take care of that while in the ground. The Iskander-M will hunt them down too . . . including US Patriot System. Russia is always innovating its arsenal and deemed 'Classified' and the Western arsenal is NO Match
@beibei93
@beibei93 27 днів тому
@@AkshayKumar-vg2pi How is Iskander better?
@machdaddy6451
@machdaddy6451 22 дні тому
The Taiwan Strait just got a little more safe from a Chinese invasion.
@mitchjames9350
@mitchjames9350 17 днів тому
That and the Marines NMESIS anti ship weapons
@almeidacheang7853
@almeidacheang7853 17 днів тому
a lot more,no doubt
@charlesrichardson8635
@charlesrichardson8635 24 дні тому
Right now ATACMS have been shifted to several areas around the South China Sea near Chinese illegal militarized artificial islands. These would be used to bring those bases under fire and neutralize them. This takes much pressure off the limited naval supply on US Task Forces if a war was to break out. Yes, as PrSM comes on line those will be immediately sent to the western Pacific where with the ranges stated would make them a very powerful support and deterrent because PrSM would be able to hit China from points in the southern Japanese island chain, Taiwan, and all around the island countries in the South China Sea. Then I can see all the extra ATACMS being moved to Eastern NATO countries and UKRAINE!
@johnnewman1483
@johnnewman1483 19 днів тому
What are you doing in south china ? Warmonger 😂
@charlesrichardson8635
@charlesrichardson8635 19 днів тому
@@johnnewman1483 What is China doing in the South China Sea. Building illegal islands to try to claim natural gas fields that already belong to Philippines, Brunei, Vietnam, Malvasia and a few other countries. The US follows international law, call UNCLOS of which China was a major contributor to the treaty and was one of the first signatories. They currently are challenging open water rights of all these nations and they commonly challenge US warships almost colliding with them. They have actually collided with Philippine ships. So that's what the US is doing there. These illegal bases, ruled thus by the UNCLOS Court, have been militarized and would be used in case of a Taiwan invasion.
@20-000
@20-000 14 днів тому
@@johnnewman1483 China will blockade that whole area when time comes if US did not do anything. It's the gateway of West to East. Totally war worthy, even more than oil fields.
@electricspeedkiller8950
@electricspeedkiller8950 5 днів тому
​@@charlesrichardson8635more like int'l law follows the usa, what a joke
@charlesrichardson8635
@charlesrichardson8635 5 днів тому
@@electricspeedkiller8950 The US was not a major participant in UNCLOS. China was. They helped write it, protecting their own borders and waterfront. They were one of the first signatories. You saying that the US MADE China do that? Hmmmmmm? You are the joke.
@johnhopkins6260
@johnhopkins6260 19 днів тому
Artillery: still the King of Battle.
@lordraydens
@lordraydens 15 днів тому
god moves through arty
@markscion
@markscion 21 день тому
PRSM looks amazing - I wonder why the boost part is not jettisoned in flight - extra weight and drag. Now UKR can get "ochen mnoga" (very many) ATACMS. Yay, Hope they keep the factories running - we need to build up a greater inventory and have warm factories given the geopolitical situation
@yl9154
@yl9154 16 днів тому
Maybe not jettisoned because it could fall on civilian's head or friendly troops?
@darrencorrigan8505
@darrencorrigan8505 13 днів тому
Thanks, Military TV.
@user-mn4sr7ti5u
@user-mn4sr7ti5u 20 днів тому
Great report!!!
@lcervantes8505
@lcervantes8505 21 день тому
What is the production volume timeline?
@i-love-space390
@i-love-space390 17 днів тому
I am so glad the US and others are starting to use RAM jet power for missiles to increase range.
@T_157-40
@T_157-40 29 днів тому
How about sending some of the former stock & send to Ukraine?
@Wised1000
@Wised1000 22 дні тому
Thats the plan, Stan👍🏻
@paulbedichek5177
@paulbedichek5177 22 дні тому
Send it all.
@mcblaze1968
@mcblaze1968 20 днів тому
Old ATACMS near the end of life are for sure coming.
@RomanVarl
@RomanVarl 17 днів тому
Great improvement if it doesn't cost the equivalent of some small country's annual budget per missle
@avia4281
@avia4281 10 днів тому
There a site showing what all USA weapons have been tested in ukraine?
@brilliant-handle
@brilliant-handle 14 днів тому
Whatever happened to smokeless propellants? Maybe it doesn't matter if launching far from the front. But if you're using a ramjet, I would think you could take the small performance hit with double base or triple base propellants. Then you don't have an obvious smoke trail going back to your launchers.
@eizol568
@eizol568 12 днів тому
“Gonna hurt me some orcs with this baby!” 💥
@luisekjeldsen1515
@luisekjeldsen1515 11 днів тому
I urge and plead with America. PLEASE keep supporting Ukraine , with no delays 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@austinshannon4197
@austinshannon4197 Місяць тому
JUAN Soto, MLB GOAT
@ReeksOfLies
@ReeksOfLies Місяць тому
Now, question is how do they take to actually make. Just because it's better than the ATACMS, it could take twice as long, 3 x longer to make each unit. Could take less time. 🤷‍♂️
@ericphan2326
@ericphan2326 Місяць тому
also at what cost? the problem with US made weapons are that no other nations can afford those in meaningful quantity.
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 Місяць тому
Main question, our ATACMS M57 warhead is more Powerful than that of our PrSM Missiles, so basically, it would require 2 PrSM Missiles to do the job of 1 of our ATACMS M57. However, our PrSM Missiles travel almost twice as far.
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek 29 днів тому
I don't see this weapon replacing attacms definitely fight side-by-side
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 29 днів тому
@@AmirShafeek Indeed! Echoing your statement 100% 👍👍
@RandyStalding
@RandyStalding 26 днів тому
@@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 The fundamental missions are different. ATACMS makes a big hole in the ground and the PRSM puts lots of penetrating holes all over an airfield. destroying many aircraft. They both fit in HIMARS containers.
@JoseLopez-mc7kw
@JoseLopez-mc7kw Місяць тому
Put propellers on front and swivels ring ms on sides
@Burgstaller007
@Burgstaller007 11 днів тому
When I saw these atacms they look like liberty caps, but the new successor to the atacms should be named PrSM aka 'liberty cap missile' because they look identical to liberty caps but second thoughts, they could call them aka magic mushroom missiles.
@retiredguyadventures6211
@retiredguyadventures6211 27 днів тому
Can the new Mako hypersonic missile be fired from a HIMARS launcher?
@Budget_Prepper
@Budget_Prepper 26 днів тому
No. That is an aircraft launched weapon.
@Wised1000
@Wised1000 22 дні тому
All ballistic missiles are hypersonic.....
@utrian4148
@utrian4148 23 дні тому
What are the costs per PrSM missile? My (only) problem with ATACMS, GMLRS and PrSM is their horrendous costs. And that leads me to the suspucion, that there's a lack of a working market for such weapons. I'm pretty sure, if US Army would define a platform and its demands, it could allow more competition - e.g. with european companies like MBDA or Rheinmetall.
@FlyMeAirplane
@FlyMeAirplane 20 днів тому
GMLRS is about $100K per missile but if you blow up a $2M helicopter it's a good deal.
@utrian4148
@utrian4148 20 днів тому
@@FlyMeAirplane It's over $200K per GMLRS. And not every one is a high value hit. If reports are true, more and more get even intercepted. US generals already say that high cost missiles become a liability if Your enemy forces You to waste it on cheap targets and producing them sucks up all of Your budget.
@ragedmayhem1
@ragedmayhem1 19 днів тому
American weapons always cost more because they are better built and better tech
@utrian4148
@utrian4148 18 днів тому
@@ragedmayhem1 This is only part of the reasons.
@MrGottaQuestion
@MrGottaQuestion 14 днів тому
@user-iq8oo6uy9o First user of ATACMS in combat destroyed 14 helicopters, some up to $20 million per unit.
@kevinkanter2537
@kevinkanter2537 18 днів тому
sounds like more ATACMS will be released from US this year ---- According to Defense Department budget documents, the PrSM will cost $1.2 billion, with 110 to be procured in fiscal year 2024 and 190 in FY-25. Earlier in 2023, the Senate Armed Services Committee urged the Army to procure 400 PrSMs per year while the service has considered issuing multiyear contracts for the system.
@michaelmarkspersonal
@michaelmarkspersonal 4 дні тому
It better have a backup navigation system so it's not solely reliant on GPS.
@fedorbutochnikow5312
@fedorbutochnikow5312 26 днів тому
The shortest distance between Taiwan and mainland China is around 130 kilometers (81 miles)
@drgonzo305
@drgonzo305 23 дні тому
Shouldn’t be so quick to get rid of cluster munitions, this could use a cluster warhead.
@FlyMeAirplane
@FlyMeAirplane 20 днів тому
This was an international treaty.
@drgonzo305
@drgonzo305 20 днів тому
@@FlyMeAirplane not with America, it’s just official policy. America never signed any international treaties on land mines or cluster munitions.
@BrokenhornKT
@BrokenhornKT 28 днів тому
WEll if the next comflict is with China, America Needs a Long Range delivery system that can do better in close support like C-130's can provide, they can land at forward landing sites and reload a lot for fire power. Better than the long range bombers, being in the Rear of frontlines means a lot when fighting with the Pacific ocean distance to cover.
@mcblaze1968
@mcblaze1968 20 днів тому
Yep. US strategy is solid. Island hopping Marine PrSM, Army Typhons, Air Force C-130 and C-17 dropped JASSM-ER (Rapid Dragon). PLAN is going to lose a lot of ships in a war. Probably most of it's navy. Good luck.
@riparianlife97701
@riparianlife97701 11 днів тому
What missile was used on the Pentagon on 9/11/2001? I'm not being a conspiracy theorist. Rumsfeld said it was a missile on live TV.
@KaiDidumaNx
@KaiDidumaNx 10 днів тому
600 miles and 2 missiles in 1 pod? So what's inside 5kg heat warhead?
@wendyharbon7290
@wendyharbon7290 Місяць тому
Depends how fast or how quick the US Aerospace Defence industries, can build and supply the US Army and USMC with PRSM weapons, then the US Government can release ATASM weapon systems to Ukraine equally?
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Місяць тому
Lockheed Martin makes these weapons, not a bunch of defense contractors together.
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 Місяць тому
Our ATACMS M57, M48 Singular Warhead Missiles (range 300 km, warhead 450 kg) are slated to be Shipped to Ukraine 🇺🇦, together with Enormous Amounts of other Advanced American Weaponry, as soon as obstacles are removed in our House of Representatives...
@sushibar777
@sushibar777 14 днів тому
Taiwan could use a few dozen launchers, and a few hundred PRSMs too, and they can afford to pay for them, and we should see that they get them.
@neiltitmus9744
@neiltitmus9744 7 днів тому
Need something with a decent ram jet in it
@margaretgibson7063
@margaretgibson7063 13 днів тому
Yes it would as long as the Prsm costs are the same as ATACM, but something tells me they are much more expensive. These escalating prices on arms and ammunition is out of hand and needs to be brough back to earth.
@wtf-dp5qr
@wtf-dp5qr 17 днів тому
the most important point has to be cost you can´t sustain a war with one single Rocket costs half a million dollar
@victoryfirst2878
@victoryfirst2878 18 днів тому
I would bet uncle Vlad is shaking in his shoes. He knows mother Russia is doomed.
@user-wq7pl8mt8j
@user-wq7pl8mt8j 5 днів тому
How will the PRSM react to GPS jamming? Jamming has already been effective against our weapons in Ukraine.
@mikeq7134
@mikeq7134 14 днів тому
What is their guidance system? Russia, and presumably China, has advanced electronic warfare capabilities that interfere with the standard GPS guidance of the ATACMS missiles.
@brettbenson7690
@brettbenson7690 17 днів тому
That puts half a dozen PLA Navy ports within range of Taipei. Once the range is extended it will be almost the entire East China seaboard.
@gabrielm8263
@gabrielm8263 13 днів тому
Slawa Ukrainie 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@PlymouthVT
@PlymouthVT 11 днів тому
ATACMS are incredible guided missiles. Deadly accurate. But an old platform and munitions for them are not plentiful especially the M39 Cluster Bomb. Too bad incredibly effective bomb.
@sparty94
@sparty94 14 днів тому
these things are worth their weight in gold on a battlefield. ukraine has shown the advantage a system like this gives the attacker.
@kylebell7879
@kylebell7879 16 днів тому
How much 😢
@Joelmonterrey
@Joelmonterrey 21 день тому
Remind the Russian trolls all over UKposts that they no longer have helicopters in Ukraine. LOL
@davidbraden1921
@davidbraden1921 9 днів тому
Thank God we have Russian radar to test this on
@moikalamanukesabonapare
@moikalamanukesabonapare Місяць тому
We are here on earth for a journey no boundaries live in peace thats what life is you love your parents children... Everyone has parents and children living in peace won't harm anyone. ... Why why why? What religion worship your own no problem....
@johnslugger
@johnslugger 12 днів тому
*Yup,,, All 560 ATACMS are on the chopping block,,,*
@jayparker393
@jayparker393 8 днів тому
Recommend extensive field testing in Ukraine!!
@Iv987654321
@Iv987654321 Місяць тому
And this one will be ten times more expensive so the will build only few of them. Ok.
@Albet27
@Albet27 29 днів тому
If they build as little as 5,000 of them, that's more than Russia has in total military aircrafts.
@kenthanna
@kenthanna 21 день тому
Ukraine will test them for a cut of future sales.
@kyrenthang8633
@kyrenthang8633 26 днів тому
"PRISM" missile?
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258
@dioghaltasfoirneartach7258 24 дні тому
PrSM Missiles
@nole8923
@nole8923 17 днів тому
It may be months or even over a year or two before the PRSMs are in full production and ready to be deployed overseas. So I doubt Ukraine is going to get them any time soon unfortunately.
@craftpaint1644
@craftpaint1644 9 днів тому
Strictly an American export weapon. If America wanted to destroy something or someone with level of firepower it would use a drone or a fighter jet. Also it just seems to be like a Russian Zircon with a higher price tag.
@tshavfengvang7831
@tshavfengvang7831 8 днів тому
Range is classified. Please don't give us numbers.
@davidhodge3894
@davidhodge3894 18 днів тому
Thought they oust got them. 😂
@markking1255
@markking1255 26 днів тому
The Ukrainian military will be getting the longer range Atacms that they have not had in the past. We can only pray for the aid package to Ukraine to be voted on and signed by Biden soon. Slava Ukraini
@ssaini5028
@ssaini5028 16 днів тому
Ukraine ran from Avdeevka with their tale between their legs, their military is finished lets be honest
@user-cm8co5nx4k
@user-cm8co5nx4k 22 дні тому
The Free World attracts and retains the brightest minds and most dedicated and loyal people from around the globe. Autocrats tremble.
@anoniem9518
@anoniem9518 14 днів тому
How about studying peace and fighting greed, which is the greatest threat to peace.
@com64able
@com64able 19 днів тому
We all know the answer... Just waiting for the transport
@szybkilewyprostyf231
@szybkilewyprostyf231 16 днів тому
Wystarczy że Ukraina dostanie dużo ATMS i będzie git.
@muskiet8687
@muskiet8687 18 днів тому
So... it's just another missile?
@eirikbjorlo
@eirikbjorlo 22 дні тому
You lost me at "miles" 😢
@markbrisec3972
@markbrisec3972 17 днів тому
People, wake up..... Russia is in the midst of a war time economy production rates.. Thus way they're able to significantly outproduce the combined arms and ammunition output of NATO countries. Russia is churning out 2 million shells and1500 tanks a year and over 100 long range missiles a month. We need to take this seriously and although it's unreasonable to expect USA, Germany, Spain or Belgium transferring to war economy now, we can still significantly ramp up production of 155mm shells, GMLRS, PRsM, Javelins, Patriot and NASAMS interceptors.... Combined we have a 30 times larger economic output than a 3rd world country like Russia. Let's move and start being serious about this.. OK?
@ssaini5028
@ssaini5028 16 днів тому
US economy is a welfare balloon. US companies care about riches, Russian companies care about the state. Russia also has all the resources and man power to sustain this war. West cannot even supply Ukraine. Russia pay $25k for a stinger missile equivalent, the US pays 400K. Massive miltary budget and 35 trillion in debt, the west cannot beat Russia on the battlefield.
@miguelmorales9667
@miguelmorales9667 15 днів тому
I'm sure the transformation is well underway, just don't expect the detail to be broadcast on the local nightly news... or UKposts. 😆
@nightshift7963
@nightshift7963 12 днів тому
We can build great stuff. But if we can't establish at least air superiority quickly, these missile want matter in the next great war due to their cost.
@davidparker75
@davidparker75 10 днів тому
Send some of these to Ukraine for more testing and surprise the Russian.
@shawmmathews889
@shawmmathews889 12 днів тому
We have to build our PSRM inventory up, then we can provide TACAMS to Ukraine.
@reallybigjohnson
@reallybigjohnson 21 день тому
Wish they would have called it ATACMS 2. Way better name.
@jeremiahjohnson7515
@jeremiahjohnson7515 11 днів тому
Ever use a mouse? That's the future of fighting. Drones use game controllers (everyone knows mice are more precise). AI Robots rule the ground. The only battles left are in the air, space, and in the sea. Land wars are obsolete.
@snuggles03
@snuggles03 Місяць тому
that’s 91 kilograms….not 91 kilogarms
@michaelromeo4601
@michaelromeo4601 11 днів тому
Most definitely send some to Ukraine 🇺🇦....for further Testing
@JayDeeChannel
@JayDeeChannel 14 днів тому
Send it to Ukraine!!!
@darkandgritty
@darkandgritty 13 днів тому
Small warheads optimized to perform like larger warheads. Going to be a letdown in that regard. ATACMS has a great payload
@richardwallinger1683
@richardwallinger1683 9 днів тому
PRSM need,s real world testing in Ukraine. against Russian electronic jamming
@boom-bm1kl
@boom-bm1kl 21 день тому
I remember when we didn't put our capabilities out there
@adriangouder1930
@adriangouder1930 21 день тому
I don't think ATACMS missiles should be called artillery.
@manowar4046
@manowar4046 11 днів тому
It's not smart to show our enemies what we got.
@user-hz2wu5sd6m
@user-hz2wu5sd6m 15 днів тому
Ukraine becomes the ground to test new arsenals
@redrust3
@redrust3 9 днів тому
Ukraine to Moscow is about 600 miles…
@british_772
@british_772 Місяць тому
The ATACMS is a beautiful tactical ballistic missile~♥
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Місяць тому
ATACAMS is not a ballistic missile, it's a guided artillery rocket.
@fdk7014
@fdk7014 18 днів тому
@@niweshlekhak9646 A guided rocket is a missile
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 17 днів тому
@@fdk7014 no missile is something that has an engine, rockets don't have engine.
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
First strike, depleted heads. Second drone assault cluster assist, third Thermo.
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
Before delivering F-16, private where is the A-10?
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
We have a till now clear to clear classical battlefield, and till now the field gets butcherd. How many Mothers we have?
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
The first plane for this none nuke is the A-10.
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
If Biden gives the A-10, we have a Problem.
@user-ok2ku7ly1j
@user-ok2ku7ly1j 20 днів тому
The next days I will relax in my chair and will be the Reader of the A-10 Option in the package 🎉
@user-im8so3yn1x
@user-im8so3yn1x 10 днів тому
Why not to test this weapon in Ukraine.
@paulnickelles207
@paulnickelles207 15 днів тому
More hype
@machdaddy6451
@machdaddy6451 22 дні тому
A new tool for "kinetic" diplomacy. Something Russia will understand and respect.
@KK-gr9df
@KK-gr9df 24 дні тому
Send to Ukraine for real world testing
@velimirkolundzija4451
@velimirkolundzija4451 19 днів тому
This is just one of the outdated systems there is no doubt that this is one of the last multiple rocket launchers that is precision if you have the correct GPS coordinates and what is good it is not difficult to train the army to work on it, but since in the East for such systems it is completely complete driving military school which gives a non-commissioned officer each of the non-commissioned officers is capable of being just as accurate on much older systems Which costs much less. But there is something that very little is said about, The most recent missiles should be listed via the G3 and G 4 networks as well as the drone, but this applies only to underlinemissiles. However, with the introduction of 5 G can very soon almost all types of ammunition will be accurate in 1 cm, this type of guidance will be able to be used in addition to rockets and grenades for 12.7 mm caliber, so what until yesterday was an anti-material rifle will be the most accurate weapon tomorrow. No matter how much the West pays attention to finishing it doesn't mean that such weapons are better, What's more, I think that all those soldiers who are used to feeling comfortable at all times when they find themselves in difficult conditions I think that such a soldier will surrender much sooner, especially since so far all Western soldiers have mostly been exchanged and even returned as soon as the conflict is over, there are nations or these nations that in the last 150 years in every war if they fell into the hands of the enemy would be immediately They are killed and simply surrender is not an option for them, even if they are seriously wounded.
@miguelmorales9667
@miguelmorales9667 15 днів тому
And this post was edited? It's still very hard, meaning impossible, to understand what the writer is trying to say. Please, go back to English class.
@Coccolinodc
@Coccolinodc 14 днів тому
A question that comes to mind is whether the advent of the PRSM will make the stocks of the older Atacms less important to US forces and therefore make them more available to Ukraine
@JinKee
@JinKee 21 день тому
So big question- is this nuclear capable?
@rogerout8875
@rogerout8875 19 днів тому
No.
@tommy_boy8631
@tommy_boy8631 9 днів тому
We are at war but to actually come out and say it would upset snowflakes
@davidlanders2853
@davidlanders2853 23 дні тому
This frees up the older Atacms to go to Ukraine..........get ready Crimea you may not have a bridge in a week or two....
@ssaini5028
@ssaini5028 16 днів тому
A bridge? Who cares, Ukraine as a country is being destroyed
@secularsunshine9036
@secularsunshine9036 18 днів тому
*Join the Enlightenment* *Support Secular Humanism.* Thanks...
@WiseMan22
@WiseMan22 12 днів тому
Too bad it will cost an arm and a leg. I bed Russia will produce something that's compable to those for a fifth of the cost. I guess that's what happens when the military complex has a monopoly on arms sales.
The 10 Advanced Weapons of USA that Will Enter Service
12:47
Military TV
Переглядів 565 тис.
Five Cutting Edge US Weapons Set To Be Deployed in 2024
8:02
Military TV
Переглядів 42 тис.
Vasiliy Lomachenko vs George Kambosos | INTERNATIONAL LIVE STREAM
3:10:05
Top Rank Boxing
Переглядів 1,1 млн
The SR-91 “Aurora”: The Plane that Doesn’t Exist…
22:15
Megaprojects
Переглядів 1 млн
British troops learn how to hide from kamikaze drone threat
4:30
Forces News
Переглядів 62 тис.
American HIMARS Rocket Artillery is Better Than You Think
12:42
Task & Purpose
Переглядів 858 тис.
How Much Firepower Does Russia Have Left After Two Years of War?
9:00
Military TV
Переглядів 202 тис.
DST | The Joint Direct Attack Munition - Extended Range (JDAM-ER) | Andrew Snowden
1:36
Defence Science and Technology Group
Переглядів 79 тис.
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 8 млн
Какой телефон лучше всего снимает? 🤯
0:42
СЛОМАЛСЯ ПК ЗА 2000$🤬
0:59
Корнеич
Переглядів 2,2 млн
Я Создал Новый Айфон!
0:59
FLV
Переглядів 2,9 млн
поворотний механізм для антени
0:17
Lazeruk
Переглядів 14 тис.