Me ha encantado mucho el vídeo Un trabajo genial❤❤❤

I have an idea for a video: Listing the heights of the tallest building from every country.

Great video nevertheless, keep up your amazing work metal. 🙏🙏❤️

Nice

No problem with the accuracy, it’s entertainment

*blue cubes enter the chat* OH F*CK

I had a touch of BCSD after that.

@@neofox. bluecubeasidus?

@@Solarwhale32 Blue Cube Stress Disorder (not making fun of ptsd)

@@neofox. oh

Or how slow we move in our real cities in our reality, or how sparse our real cities really are :(

And they are rendered with a huge amount of details. It's a real pleasure to play them, thanks to authors.

I was just looking at London today and by God, I didn't realize it is absolutely MASSSSSSSSSSSSIVE!

@@Jason32Bournela is similar although not quite developed as it’s mostly a small downtown with neighborhoods but those neighborhoods stretch for miles and miles and miles and miles. And São Paulo is just a megacity. Imagine manhattan as far as the eye can see. Shits overwhelming to say the least

Well, London is the biggest city there is in terms of size, but yes.

red dead is awesome 😍

​@@Sodapop-rd5ku but it's the most complex world ever created

I saw another video saying that it was 179km2. Sadly it's very hard to get a proper estimation. But indeed it's huge, and they still didn't neglect any detail

and its like 117GB for that reason!

and JC3 Medici

@@ProtiumPower Yeah, I actually tried walking from one city to another once in Daggerfall. It takes hours, if not days. It's insane how huge it is. Of course, most of it's empty, but that was hardly their fault given the time period it was made in, and it still has an insane number of locations in it.

The best

The elder scrolls maps keep getting smaller but when tes 6 comes out (in like 2028) it will probably be bigger than Skyrim

@alfredjune1087 - Except the map doesn't keep getting smaller. Daggerfall (game 2) had the biggest. Arena (game 1) had second biggest. ESO is third biggest and is the newest. Oblivion is game 4 and is 4th biggest, and Skyrim is 5th biggest. Morrowind was game 3 and is the smallest open world game. Only Redguard and Battlespire are smaller, with one coming before Morrowind and one after it.

​@@riccardo6820wrong

:-D :-D

Yeah that's why the driving game at the end is so impressive to me. I mean let's be honest here, there's no practical way to actually simulate these things by hand and procedural gen is the to go for foreseable future probably even with weird AI techniques, but at least some of them do physically do it (and also let's be honest here, if you've ever walked in the wildnerness it does get kinda samey after awhile which is part of why you can get lost). But in a lot of them they just don't even do it, letting you like walk across Eastern Russia tier in the span of an hour at tops, when again, it's human incapacity to appreciate the vastness of scale (I think this is rooted in our primitive brain structure where you can physically see and differentiate one, two, or three seeds in your hand, before which around like 8-10 it becomes "many" "a lot" "a whole shitbunch" etc. and you can no longer differentiate individual numbers better than a magpie can, literally). But in that one driving game you *can* actually drive those kinds of real distances, which is why only some games even bother trying to actually simulate it than just fast travel points stitched together. It does get annoying on a game like Witcher 3 where you're arbitrarily move back which doesn't work on some areas where you're trying to cross to a thing and don't actually know where the invisible walls are so it keeps respawning you. Meanwhile some other games allow you to seemlessly travel across "different areas" and gens it so you actually can spend 6 IRL hours traveling and not get anywhere.

Lol that's hilarious😂😂

Chinese man using bullet trains to work does

rdr2

That’s what makes it a great game

Cause you have to either walk or ride everywhere on a horse, and carriages are only for fast travel. Gotta remember, the place is literally just a "province" of Tamriel.

@@J_C_CH and is scaled down in comparison with his real size.

Comparison from a different Bethesda game: one of the first things that blew my mind in "Fallout: New Vegas" was walking down a section of the freeway with no noticeable monuments, and coming to the slow realization that I knew this section (it's a section that goes downhill, flattens, and then uphill) because I've driven through it in real life. However, in real life, it took about 15 minutes while going a few miles over the speed limit. In game, it takes about a minute walking.

Skyrim feels massive because of the mountains imo

Space Engine looking that 🤡

@@DrxD0 space engine is not a game.

Just wait until you see universe sandbox.

@@The_Andromeda_Galaxy Universe sandbox is a sandbox. It does not simulate a universe so you can create one.

And then came Elite Dangerous to twist it a little more.

Same with elite dangerous

@@AverageAlien “same” alright then, 5:34

no man's sky doesn't count tho, since it auto generate itself while the maps in the video are actually MAPS

@@antoniocostei2095 With that kind of strange logic minecraft wouldn't count too :/

@@tagnade nooe it does, minecraft is a MAP since it has a border so basically it counts

Yeah I don't understand the fascination with map size, it doesn't necessarily make the game better, would rather have quality over quantity. Elite is a great game but 99% of the game is literal dead space and past a certain point the procedural generation of the planets means there are a lot of copies and not unique ones.

@@Tharathgar True. While I undestand both people who want large maps and people who want smaller but more detailed maps, I think that that varies with the purpose of the game and charm. For example, Ark and Minecraft are both sandbox games, but M. has a map thousands of times larger than all the Ark maps combined. However, Ark has hand-crafted and determined places which are always there and you will have to go there to advance throught the story, while in Minecraft you can go to the End to complete the "story" by creating a portal, which you can make anywhere on the map.

@@Tharathgar I think it's the fascination is much deeper than maps itself. A map the size of a country is already massive let alone bigger than a planet, stars, entire solar systems, etc. Just what is the limit for us? We might speculate but then in the next century, there'll be a game that makes No Man's Sky looks puny. But it's much more than maps; it's how vast something can get in an immeasurable plane.

Forgot Riders Republic

This is something I miss in some older games. The map felt it was the right size, everything had a purpose and you knew wherever you went you'd have something new to so there.

What video are those on?

@@anick32 on this ukposts.info/have/v-deo/kpJmpYqbmWx9w4E.html

@@Deepak.Dahiya Thats the one. Fantastic and utterly mind bending video!

Everyone who watches Metaball studios is traumatized of Blue cubes

God that video was terrifying.

shitty overhyped game

I just love Night City

Yes, this isn't a really good idea in a game to made a sprawl this big @@UnitTrace

Yup, just saw that video and came here to see for myself!

I was hoping for spore 🤷🏼‍♂️

@@finnmcrae LOLOL

@@finnmcrae Spore planets are pretty tiny. about 1/6 the size of the moon, maybe smaller. The distances between outer rim and center of galaxy, is also not that big. I think Minecraft is bigger. :P

I was hoping for Space Engine shows up and zooms out to the observable universe

@@michaelbfdiiwong523 true but that's more of a physics simulator, plus it would be redundant I think. But that is a fun game, lol,

And it all fit on a floppy disk.

Isn't "Elite Dangerous" just a remake/sequel of "Frontier: Elite II"?

@@babyyoshi3099 more a remake than a sequel

@@LeightonGill How did they get a floppy to do that!?

@@dubuyajay9964 Procedurally generated content, just like Minecraft's world having such a size is because it generates it on the fly.

En el mapa de rdr2 no pasa lo mismo

My problem with skyrim is you have such an amazing map....so why does 90% of quests have to be in a cave or an isolated area? A lot of quests should have taken place outside and hinestly I wouldn't even mind them if you didnt have to go through like 3 layers of dungeon.

I've never seen a game more of a desert than skyrim. So much meaningless content.

yeah like elite dangerous is technically 99.99% empty space, for a space game that makes sense but for a list like this its treated the same as games with insane detail

@@jeremytesticleman1607 🧌

It's our galaxy...

Elite dangerous is only our milky way system, not the universe.

@@Julmaa87 its actually the scale of the milky way galaxy they do show it in the video. A lot bigger than our solar system

@@Oninje The Milky Way includes our solar system.

@@Julmaa87 yes... But its not only our solar system

Yup... Some of these games might be small when you can only walk or run, others can be big but you're driving a Bugatti at 250mph.

meanwhile no man's sky where u can walk/run on any planet and fly spaceships wherever:

@@justacoolguy5296 I feel like as of now no game will come close to No Man's Sky and its absolute ridiculous scale. Maybe some day ... but it's just astronomical.

@@maolcogi until you realize that "space engine" is basically the entire observable universe where you can fly at any speed. Theres also a flight sim with ships that you can fly through space and on planets

I actually made a really simple formula for this, and it is: D×((D/s)/(D/1.5)), where D equals to the diameter of the video game map in meters, and s equals to the walking speed of the video game character in meters per second. (1.5 is the walking speed of a human in meters per second.) This must give a perspective in the size of the video game map (in meters) in real life relatively with the game's walking speed.

But only limited to earth though

Is this game the biggest non-procedurally generated game map, since it's the actual earth?

@@ndotb2891 I thought you said motherfu*ckers,anyways,I know mfs have a space version but it didn't go well

@@willek1335 it is procedurally generated just instead of randomness its from maps of the earth and stuff

And then Microsoft flight simulator is in no man’s sky

If you go by Oblivion and Skyrim, then Tamriel is about the size of a medium-sized city. You could hike across it in less than a day.

@@JakeKoenig in TES 6 the map should be the real size of only 1 region, that means 1 country

Canonical? Which canon? Any source?

I thought it'd be when the camera expands to galaxy level

Yeah I was also hoping to see botw’s map, but I was satisfied with the whole video

@@duck.mp4656 Came here to see where BOTW stood. Bummer. I've found some great stuff about the evolution of video game map sizes. There are some crazy jumps that came with certain new technologies besides obv increased memory, some of these within the same generation and even same console. Also, I think the cosmo scale games skew the picture. Don't care how big space is with arbitrarily fast spacecraft to zip around. I want to know the first game you could walk for actual days across a map that was dynamic

@ℕ𝔼𝕆ℕ ℂ𝕀𝕋𝕐 You're off by a decade or two, I think. The original 1984 _Elite_ might qualify, or the '77 _Heli-Shooter_ if Google's to be believed. Or maybe the '86 _Wibarm_ if you want polygons, or the '88 _Star Cruiser_ for something that looks slightly nicer. _Ocarina of Time_ was definitely a landmark title when it released in '98, although when it comes to open-world game design it's been a _bit_ overshadowed by '01's _Grand Theft Auto III_ and its... everything.

Yeah, not sure why he left BotW off. It's only one of the biggest open world games of the last 5 years. Guess MetaBall just isn't a Zelda fan lol.

Foxhole and Planetside would probably be like GTA 5. About 60ish square miles.

I actually LOL'd at that. "The whole planet". Yeah, and it's all travel-able in real time.

would mean we could fly or use a boat to get from continent to continent.

Yeah. It's so cursed and awkward, but kinda cool at the same time.

It's the fact that they have Dallas instead of Houston though 💀

Minecraft bedrock edition is infinite like INFINITY there's no end even larger than java 30M people went quintillions of blocks out larger than the SOLAR SYSTEM and a certain instigure limit has to end it

@@nitroblocker6301 isn't the map limit is 32 bit integer limit?

No fun that way. Its better to show it as is.

I think Minecraft would be the biggest that way

@@FireFerdia98 pointless if you can't go to it.

From what I understand however, the vast majority of the Elite Dangerous map is still accessible

yeah like assasins creede odessey, its a bunch of islands, same with world of warcraft, the "map" is huge but the playable area isnt nearls as big as the map. as well eve online's size is possible to measure, although it is several hundreds of lightyears across from the ORE mining site all the way west and over to iirc the drone spaces all the way east since its on a 2d plane (mostly...)

And it even wasent made by tripple-A studio!

The game has 250 galaxies

@@oleandre_7816 nope, first 256 galaxies are all different, from the 257th Will be the clone of the 1th. So also galaxies have unlimited number. That's No'Mans Sky.

Euclid, the first galaxy, is already big enough for everyone. And yet Hello Games gave us 254 more. (there are 255 real galaxies, any beyond that were bugs that were patched out; the only way to get to them now is to travel to a base that a player put there while they were accessible)

Too bad none of the planets are interesting

star citizens whole map does not have any load time, its one map

@@SJRS700 Maybe. But are you so sure about that? I have no idea hiw they programmed it. My comment was on the representation on this video. As a reference I do believe that Star Citizen is bigger then No Man's Sky for example because No Man's sky is built on one zone where they generate planets and events based on a seed. You don't need a loading screen to load assets in. You can use a tram, travel time, etc.. to achieve the same. Like in No Man's Sky they use the lightspeed animation to generate the new seed. In reality, the player didn't hop somewhere else. Videogames need to rely on these tricks to give you a sense of scope without explosing your CPU.

They're going for content instead of bragging rights of thousands of star systems like E:D and NMS. There's 1 system in the game atm it and it already has a fuckton more content than E:D and NMS combined.

it was the 2.0 version of the map, back then there was only a few space stations with no planets, the gas giant which they put their cloud city on is the same size as earth

The only long travel time is the one to release the game. Scam Citizen

It's still a mindbender. All that land area, back with 1996 technology!

That's amazing wth

Elite Dangereous and NMS are generated too...

Randomly generated (not picked) maps are THE way to game.

Minecraft is randomly generated

yeah, tho something interesting to consider is that, for what i understand its not really 1 map but rather each planet/location is basically an independent map stitched together with loading screen, by this logic one could argue that all minecraft seeds should be counted too ; but yeah pretty much what i imagened

I think that I'm going to want to try this at some point, hopefully at 4k when (if lol) I get a new enough graphics card to support that, because the best thing about not just MSFS20 but also X-Plane 11 is the fact that you can literally fly in real time towards another city and see it just like a real flight. I think that may be something we don't even know is missing about space sims, because you can't truly appreciate even the lighting of what a city at night looks like in Cities: Skylines or a flight sim until you have flown, and both replicate it perfectly. My main problem with Microsoft's new flight sim (among many others, like the cost flight autists somehow allowed to get "normalized" and bad DLC content) is that it really makes itself out to be greater than it is, which is that it doesn't even mimic different real air hazard scenarios nor model it, such as birdstrike or losing the engine cowel or your landing gear etc., and that it is thereby IMPOSSIBLE both to simulate the Hudson Landing as well as striking a building, which just kills it for me when I can bob and weave through skyscrapers and fly right through it. Lack of object permanence makes it feel like a late 90s game, not a real sim, but even that wouldn't bother me so much were it not for the fact it doesn't ACTUALLY show you what's really there. If you fly over your town you will notice that absent a few landmarks it basically doesn't replicate shit and just procedurally generates the same buildings tiled over and over. So in a lot of ways it's not really that super different than Elite: Dangerous or No Man's Sky.

the cool thing about no man's sky is that if you go to the center of the Galaxy it takes you to a new one

No man sky bigg but minecraft is infinite

No Man's Sky is so amazing!

That's because ETS2 and ATS are not open world. Sure you can roam the roads freely, but there is no map outside these roads. You cannot decide to go offroad except in a few selected locations

@@zegamerz1980 Not much different from including space sims, I love them but they aren't truly "open world" either; they have (hidden) loading screens. You're "stuck" within systems or planets in space sims, with travel time "between" systems or entering a planet's gravity just being a glorified loading screen. In Elite Dangerous, for example, the time during supercruise when you're in witch space is purely loading, you can't actually travel between systems without initiating the load screen by going into supercruise (you can't just fly directly between systems, you have to hit the "open door/load this area/interact" button, like going into a dungeon in Skyrim, the dungeons aren't included as part of the main "open world" map since they have to be separately loaded). At least in ETS and ATS, there's no (hidden) load screens like that, they're open to explore the roads without waiting (unless you include ferry and train travel, but those aren't necessities of the game's loading system like it is for space sims, those are just to mirror real life ferries and trains taking cargo across the water - they could easily add a bridgeway over to GB to remove the need to wait on a load to get to/from GB, though it'd be unrealistic).

The map is relatively small tbh, because theres nothing between the roads except decorative landscape and you cant leave the road itself

It’s crazy though, because Elder Scrolls Arena came out when I was only a few months old. They were so ahead of their time. As much as I love the more recent Elder Scrolls games, the modern Bethesda could never launch something so groundbreaking and revolutionary. Their tech today feels dated upon release. The work that those early Bethesda devs did laid the ground for the No Man’s Sky, Elite Dangerous, and Eve people.

@@D71219ONE The thing about Arena is it isn't actually open world. If you tried to walk from one location to another, you'd never get there, cause it just procedurally generates more land. So it isn't actually that big of a map

They would 1 begin celebrating and 2 probably fuck it up trying to improve what you told them

I wish there was the original elite for comparison. pretty mind blowing for its time.

True crime LA at 3:22 was one game where i remember thinking why they made it so unreasonably massive especially considering it was a gamecube and ps2 game.

I myself am more of a fantasy gamer, and I never really realised how huge witcher 3 actually is, but it is indeed very incredible to see the different games compared, and how some huge games can feel small, and some small games can feel huge!

@@sircharlz4512 True it's like when you disable fog on GTA San Andreas

ghost recon wildlands is amazing due to how much the map is filled ,it took me 2 months to complete the game

The Elder Scrolls Arena came out in 1994

I literally only watch these types of videos to see if they will include AC. It's always nice to see that game get some recognition.

@@maxgoodman5100 true but kinda sad to see EQ not on the list. That game also felt massively large.

AC boys :) God I miss playing that in the early 00s. I'd time travel to go back to full ac1 servers

18 quintillion plus billions is still 18 quintillion though. A billion is microscopic compared to a quintillion.

@@gr6e theres enough to go around

That doesn't even compare to the complexity of elite dangerous they say if you fly normally in the game it would take you thousands of years just to get to our solar system in the game

Have been playing this game for about 3 weeks now and just the amount of space out there in the game is crazy. I have started a few different games and have been all over the place. Love the game

​@@gr6e think about what you said real quick. in a game billions of planets is small and insignificant. lmao that's amazing. I never thought games could come this far. I'm excited to see how far it goes.

Same. Kerbal Space Program is amazing

IIRC, Jool has an orbit about the same as Mars. Of course then there's RSS mod, which is just the solar system 1:1

I was also expecting the Hearthian system... but then I remembered that the game world is, like, less than 100km in diameter. Outer Wilds is several orders of magnitude scaled down from KSP... which if you think about it, so would be the physical processes in the game, considering the Hearthian Sun, barely comparable in size to Mars' moons, goes from yellow star to red giant to supernova in 22 minutes.

Depends how hard you mod it, I have a saved instance somewhere that has 24 solar systems in it. My 8GB RAM quad core AMD could barely handle it.

I was expecting that too

Technically speaking, what we all know London as isn't actually a city. It's a county. The City of London itself is a roughly square mile district in the very centre, surrounded by 32 boroughs (just like any other county would have boroughs), 1 of which is also a city (the City of Westminster).

Technically speaking, what we all know as London hasn't existed since 1965, when the county 'London' was abolished and repurposed as part of the new 'Greater London' county.

Technically speaking, London Borough, greater London, City of London etc, would make for one hell of a game world!

Can also fit so many guys in Yourmum

It took me something like three hours to walk down part of Manhattan. It isn't just their length, but the depths to their scale. It isn't just about being linear. Like you can try and boil a human life down to the distance you've walked across your entire lifetime, that says nothing at all about its complexity, and that's where the differences lay, like in the smoothness versus wrinkles and interconnects to a human brain. What makes a city so vast and vastly complicated are those interconnects, the places to explore in them, above and underneath them, and sheer scope of logistics required to keep it running. It's actually quite frightening which is why some people or rather anyone not 89IQ is deeply concerned about the future because they are fully operating outside human scale now, as is the entire global commercial system, mainly being more a series of emergent properties like an ant colony now than anyone or even any large group of persons being able to unfuck it if anything actually goes wrong. That is partly why a single nuclear attack is so crippling, or any sufficiently large disaster really, because the entire system utterly falls apart, and that is why a student of history should be so worried, because the planet is littered with the broken wreckage of countless hundreds of different forgotten societies, systems, places, and civilizations. Like there are towns in France people didn't even know existed because they'd been depopulated and abandoned since the black death and were only rediscovered in WWII by aerial surveillance, and it's not that long ago nor as complex. Our present civilizations will serve a similar world tombstone to future generations a millenia from now. We're actually living in a uniquely interesting historical period to a time tourist, divorced from that appreciation by our own myopic temporal frame of reference, not knowing how truly alien this civilization is not just to human history going backward, but also forward, due to no appreciable frame of reference, and so most cannot even begin to conceptualize or fathom this in any way but "this is what is." When the global societies begin going down in a series of cascade failures this coming century it's pretty much going to be because of that, which is for the same reasons as why the jungles of Cambodia to the mountain foothills of South America and the mound builders near the Mississippi are some forgotten ruins swallowed by nature. They got there because they achieved a particular level of complexity that could no longer be directed or controlled by anyone, and finally hit a problem like food shortages or epidemic which brought it down in a way that no one could stop even if they had the answers to how to fix it and the foreknowledge of what was coming. You could've told them when their society was damned and why, and it would've changed nothing for them, even if they believed you.

Glad someone else mentioned the game that gives u literally everything we can see

I'm glad someone mentioned it

How can a game be a 1:1 scale REPLICA, and be "procedurally generated"? 🤔🤔🤔🤔

@@atlantic_love It replicates the known parts of the universe and procedurally generates the unknown parts.

@@higztv1166 Anyone have numbers on how much of the universe is known by humans? 🤣

Yeah it's a problem with open world game, sure the world is huge...but does it need to? FF XV and BOTW are 2 exemple, there is so many space that are just empty and awefully dull (not there are no interresting area), I would have prefered a slightly smaller BOTW world but with more well handcrafted places.

i enjoied every bit of ff15 map without fast travel, even sub quests

@@ballom29 That new Tom Clansy Ghost Recon game has the same problem I saw a video on it

@@ballom29 actually, for BotW it's not as empty as it seems. Other than being beautiful af, there's always some korok or easter eggs to previous games sprinkled in nearly every location. I daresay BotW was made with more passion than 70% of the games on this list.

@@guidedexplosiveprojectileg9943 What do you mean by new? if you mean Breakpoint, i've got to disagree. Auroa is a perfect size, with a mixture of biomes and the world is full of lore. It's also stunningly beautiful. I played the game with no HUD or Fast travel on an immersive difficulty - very enjoyable experience. The issue is, people aren't willing to take their time with these type of games and would rather speedrun through them instead.

my friend has the game, you can go to our solar system or go to betelgeuse it's kinda insane, no man sky is even weirder how a ps4 can handel a map that is bigger than the milky way

@@papaguro im not a techie and barely played the game, but no mans skys planets are randomly generated arent they? and whenever you travel to a new planet you need to use hyperdive so i would guess that they dont actually have all of that open space as an actual full map, so your console just needs to load the render distance of your current area and your destination loads when you arrive. could be wrong though. plus its all empty space so i would imagine theres VERY little going on outside of your ship, others ships, and planets youve been to edit: still impressive though

@@mm-gk6xg you theoretically don't have to use the hyperdrive, but you probably want to since flying to another system would take you years

Lmao

No wonder I cant download it because it’s size

Facts

You're an actual legend for mentioning that game 👑 🙏

If the galaxy of Spore has the size of the Milky Way, is probably top 5 in largest maps. Is an incredible goal for an old game. When I reach the space age with my race, and was able to travel between stars, I was totally shocked! I can't reach to imagine how it feels No Man's Sky.

​@@radicaleroatopeno man's sky is excessively large incomprehensibly Colossus

Elder scrolls maps are representative, for engine limitations can't be real scale, but the entire USA can fit in Morrowind

Would love to see a map of all of Tamriel for Elder Scrolls Online.

Just an elder scrolls map comparison

Nah.

You are alone, aren't you? :)

Well it's actually infinite. In the original version of the video people argued over it

Its infinite, cuz u see, thats there is things even after the far lands

The Milky Way galaxy was, in fact, featured in this video. Just add any games that use it to the list.

@@danielduncan6806 my brain

I’ve played it as well and no matter what everyone will discover a place no one has been.

@@Mallard790 I sometimes find star systems discovered by other players. It’s an odd feeling.

There is an infinity before and after this life, again and again and again.

@@accelerationquanta5816 wait, everyone plays on the same map? thats nuts, i didn't really know much about no mans sky but thats crazy, how fast can you travel between planets and solar systems?

Its poetic that someone created a game world, countless times larger than the one we are living on. But as somebody who doesnt know anything about the game but its size: is it the same procedure as Minecraft, that every single Planet is generated completely random? Just like world seeds in minecraft or something?

the only match for no mans sky...

Its not really a video game

@@NotFound_404 Yeah not technically, but I thought it was worth the mention

No search Google the size of 1300km of that map is correct Are you toxic? Search before you comment.

@@user-zx3lw2ue6j I didn't say the map size was wrong. Learn English

PippenFTS with the community and modding is helping make the entire earth in Minecraft. It's been going on for years now.

Well no man's sky has over 255 galaxies 😬😬

Vinícius 13 é um deus mano. Não duvide de seus poderes

Fabo traveled whole 30M locks without any Portals

Minecraft ses aussi comm ça sur bedrock je vous rappelle 😒

Confirmo

ff15 was in there

@@maydaymalone1275 Thanks ! I will have to watch it again.

@@maydaymalone1275 I did not realize that map was larger than Ashrons Call! I guess driving made it not seem the size it is. Walking would have felt it though.