We’re Close to a Universal Quantum Computer, Here’s Where We're At

  Переглядів 3,885,987

Seeker

Seeker

5 років тому

Quantum computers are just on the horizon as both tech giants and startups are working to kickstart the next computing revolution.
U.S. Nuclear Missiles Are Still Controlled By Floppy Disks - • When U.S. Nuclear Miss...
Read More:
Quantum Computing and the New Space Race
nationalinterest.org/feature/q...
“In January 2017, Chinese scientists officially began experiments using the world’s first quantum-enabled satellite, which will carry out a series of tests aimed at investigating space-based quantum communications over the course of the next two years.”
Quantum Leap in Computer Simulation
pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articl...
“Ultimately it will help us understand and test the sorts of problems an eventually scaled-up quantum computer will be used for, as the quantum hardware is developed over the next decade or so.”
How Quantum Computing Will Change Your Life
www.seeker.com/quantum-comput...
“The Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics kicked off a new season of live-streamed public lectures featuring quantum information expert Michele Mosca.”
Sign Up For The Seeker Newsletter Here - bit.ly/1UO1PxI
____________________
Seeker inspires us to see the world through the lens of science and evokes a sense of curiosity, optimism and adventure.
Visit the Seeker website www.seeker.com/
Subscribe now! / dnewschannel
Seeker on Twitter / seeker
Seeker on Facebook / seekermedia
Seeker www.seeker.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ: 6 900
@Hykje
@Hykje 5 років тому
Windows will both crash and not crash at the same time.
@rollozucco209
@rollozucco209 5 років тому
Heisenberg, i presume?
@resulalkan9585
@resulalkan9585 5 років тому
@@rollozucco209 I think it's more Schrödinger.
@carnivalwrestler
@carnivalwrestler 5 років тому
@@rollozucco209 Ask his cat.
@KangJangkrik
@KangJangkrik 5 років тому
@@carnivalwrestler But it already both alive and die, now what?
@danijelmercep3248
@danijelmercep3248 5 років тому
Hahahaha
@jasonsweeney1317
@jasonsweeney1317 5 років тому
Finally, they're making a PC 2.
@KingBr33ch
@KingBr33ch 5 років тому
Jason Sweeney underrated comment
@hidden8143
@hidden8143 5 років тому
will minecraft 2 come with it
@Chalchiuhtecolotol
@Chalchiuhtecolotol 5 років тому
The all new PC 2 S Plus
@bikkyychaudhry4510
@bikkyychaudhry4510 5 років тому
But can it run Crysis ???????
@tehgendo
@tehgendo 5 років тому
I was looking for this comment lol.
@xflushestmean93x54
@xflushestmean93x54 4 роки тому
I’ll be telling my grandchildren the story my grandfather told me, “when I was a young man these things took up a whole room”. That genuinely make me happy
@cinnamonium_
@cinnamonium_ 3 роки тому
Wow your grandpa is actually cool unlike some people who are always like WE HAD LOW POWERED STUFF WE WERE BORN IN THE COOLEST TIMES SO UR UNLUCKY!!!
@caseyrayharris.esquire489
@caseyrayharris.esquire489 3 роки тому
When you're grandparents were born the world population was 2 billion, that doubles by 76 adding 1 bill every 13 years since the 60s. Factories already refrain from fully automating their proceses. We're struggling to create jobs now, how about when the population doubles again? Until we have a thermometer chart to show how much you shouldn't be having kids, & the responsible people will follow suit. Create neuter pop ups for people. I know many dudes who are already saving for a vasectomy now. Like they do for poor dental care in Appalachia, except for a even more pertinent cause.In Europe they made a 100% automated greenhouse using A.I., robotics, hydroponics, 3D laser scanning. From germination to market bound truck without touching a human hand. Using exact water & nutrition. Eliminating pollution runoff in rivers which render fish inedible, ruining ecosystems, pollution from tractors & the production of tractors, pollution from fule. 18wheelerz riding along side combines to empty their hopper. Conserving the Water table to boot. We can do this but we have to start publicly educating ignorant people & shaming the willfully stupid trolls. Stick to facts
@sepg5084
@sepg5084 3 роки тому
Hopefully, quantum computing is actually feasible. I hope it's not like Fusion powerplants, where R&D has been decades already and we can achieve fusion but it does not produce net positive power output yet. Some people think it never will.
@synapticreactions9056
@synapticreactions9056 2 роки тому
@@sepg5084 they we’re successful just a few days ago in China
@eltelle
@eltelle 5 років тому
My ex girlfriend was a master at quatum logic, every act was a yes and a no or a maybe at the same time and changed constantly uppon observation.
@americancitizen748
@americancitizen748 5 років тому
I hear you, brother...
@mewntay230
@mewntay230 5 років тому
lmfao
@HRG526
@HRG526 3 роки тому
Underrated af
@heaven4247
@heaven4247 3 роки тому
You me a Vacation.
@anderander5662
@anderander5662 3 роки тому
Exactly......I got a new girlfriend. Fixed the problem
@mrflippy3578
@mrflippy3578 5 років тому
*wants to watch a video on quantum computers* *gets educated on what 0s and 1s do for the millionth time*
@mrdingles5107
@mrdingles5107 5 років тому
MrFlippy I tried learning what binary code is, reading articles and watching videos, still get lost!
@retrosad
@retrosad 5 років тому
Binary (also known as base 2) is the language the computer uses to transfer data.
@mrflippy3578
@mrflippy3578 5 років тому
I am being educated once again.
@soufianefariss
@soufianefariss 5 років тому
You're not alone!
@Andrew-hl3tk
@Andrew-hl3tk 5 років тому
Majority of the video is new and complex information and thats what you pull out of it? fucking genius
@federalbureauofinvestigati2945
@federalbureauofinvestigati2945 4 роки тому
1936: We present you .... "The Computer" ! -Wtf is this? 2018: We present you " The Quantum Computer" !!! -Wtf is this?
@NatHug_
@NatHug_ 2 роки тому
-Wtf is this?
@indiawest2025
@indiawest2025 2 роки тому
2021: We present you .... Rasberry pi cluster....
@tylerwickwire1522
@tylerwickwire1522 5 років тому
you lost me at "understanding quantum physics."
@anmol9886
@anmol9886 3 роки тому
No one cares Dumbass
@mendesgabriel4775
@mendesgabriel4775 3 роки тому
Dream-Y Craft why saying that everyone is built different you are the dumb ass cause you are making fun of the type of mind this comment has we all have creativity we are all smart we just have to learn taht
@anmol9886
@anmol9886 3 роки тому
@@mendesgabriel4775 *that
@monochromatic9601
@monochromatic9601 3 роки тому
@@anmol9886 "No ones cares Dumbass" (By the way "Dumbass" isn't supposed to be capitalized, and you forgot the period at the end of your sentence.) Why would you say "No one cares" when clearly you care enough to post a comment, and at least 226 people cared enough about his comment to push the like button.
@ohyeahyeah9406
@ohyeahyeah9406 5 років тому
Finally I play minecraft in 160 FPS with realistic mod
@frosty1865
@frosty1865 4 роки тому
more like 10000 fps
@aliaaiz278
@aliaaiz278 4 роки тому
RUST is better than Minecraft
@aliaaiz278
@aliaaiz278 4 роки тому
@Zenvii it sure is more realistic 😜
@ceoge4887
@ceoge4887 4 роки тому
@@aliaaiz278 you think minecraft is made to be realistic?
@sadtip8173
@sadtip8173 4 роки тому
But the cost.. prob quntem computer will be a Soo fast that a normal for i7 won't get close so and a 2070 gtx do it probably cost 200,000 dillers or more
@MrAjay408
@MrAjay408 5 років тому
I sat here and watched the entire time like my dumbass knew what they were talking about.
@Bikewithlove
@Bikewithlove 5 років тому
MrAjay408 - I think that’s the idea. I smell a ponzi scheme. When she said that ‘computers work with zeroes and ones, but quantum bits, (or qbits) work with combinations of zeroes and ones,’ my bullshit detector pegged in the red. “Combinations of zeroes and ones.” Yeah, that’s called binary. It’s like saying “Where cars run on wheels, quantum cars run on pairs of wheels. It’s called Unified Quadraxle.” Maybe if she wiggled more and moved her hands around in the air she might get more investors. The people in this infomercial remind me of Amway cultists or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. They’re talking nice at you but you can see the gears turning behind their eyes as they cheerlead you into undermining your own self-respect. You’ve got to love that chandelier at the beginning with a chip glued to it, by the way. I’ve seen more convincing tech art in Soho galleries, and that thing is the best they could come up with? Don’t even get me started on the lame circuit designs. Might as well have shown a little metal robot windup toy.
@MrAjay408
@MrAjay408 5 років тому
@@Bikewithlove I sat here and read this entire thing like my dumbass knew what you were talking about.
@tomsquad1979
@tomsquad1979 5 років тому
Bikewithlove couldn’t agree more. Quantum computing is utter horse shit.
@zeboy1959
@zeboy1959 5 років тому
@@Bikewithlove As they said, they need everything to be modular and reconfigurable, and different companies are testing different designs and way s of quantum computing. It;s only in its experimental stage. So what if it looks like a chandelier. If you were joking I don't think you would have analyses them as you did " talking nice at you but you can see the gears turning behind their eyes as they cheerlead you into undermining your own self-respect", you were defiantly serious. Those "lame circuit designs" work in quantum, might not work so well on classical but this isn't classical computing (Edit: Loved how you edited your original reply to make yourself seem less like an asshole)
@zeboy1959
@zeboy1959 5 років тому
​@@MrAjay408 Omfg you're awesome xD
@maxd3516
@maxd3516 5 років тому
Internet explorer would still be slow on this computer
@carlos79934
@carlos79934 5 років тому
Jose Valerio it’s actually Chrome OS
@kwamefreeman9207
@kwamefreeman9207 5 років тому
Lmao
@acidszn
@acidszn 5 років тому
@Jose Valerio its a joke lol
@davida1b2c3d4c5
@davida1b2c3d4c5 5 років тому
It would be both slow and fast at the same time. At times it would also be Chrome and Firefox.
@2167Ace
@2167Ace 5 років тому
Microsoft is rebuilding Edge "IE" on chromium. Same as Chrome. Whoever made this decision need nobel peace prize
@chungdha
@chungdha 5 років тому
Getting closer to the Matrix
@ahmed_samy1
@ahmed_samy1 3 роки тому
Lol 🤣
@ratuadilFF
@ratuadilFF 3 роки тому
?
@ahmed_samy1
@ahmed_samy1 3 роки тому
@@ratuadilFF what !
@Towzlie
@Towzlie 3 роки тому
We're alrerady in the Matrix.
@drcakeman
@drcakeman 3 роки тому
@@Towzlie How do you know you're not in the matrix INSIDE THE MATRIX?! GOING INTO THE NEXT ONE AHHH!!!
@benjaminjernfors
@benjaminjernfors 4 роки тому
What I’m intrested in is that with quantum computers we could find out how to maintain fusion reaction in such a way that it puts out more energy that it takes in. That gives us time for the end of times to figure out all the other things and maybe save our planet and thus save our species.
@DShaker24
@DShaker24 5 років тому
And here I was expecting to actually hear about the progress we're making instead of the basic explanation of quantum computing for a billionth time.
@n3bie
@n3bie 5 років тому
Thanks for saving me the time!
@MegaLietuvislt
@MegaLietuvislt 5 років тому
I wish I read this before watching the entire video
@informativepeople6862
@informativepeople6862 5 років тому
It is unfortunate that this is the case, although I don't expect them to be giving out hints to other aspiring Quantum computer scientists. I think they did say that they were "racing". What I was looking for, was how powerful these things have gotten.I found this video a while ago if you are interested:ukposts.info/have/v-deo/e5WmfaWnlqBjw30.html
@informativepeople6862
@informativepeople6862 5 років тому
Hope that helped
@BILLSNOTDEAD
@BILLSNOTDEAD 5 років тому
Heres a quantum computer, BUT WAIT, YOU NEED TO KNOW HOW IT WORKS. the end
@holdmybeer
@holdmybeer 5 років тому
still not sure to be excited or scared? i know, ill retain both states at once.
@lewisblackwiththenicehair
@lewisblackwiththenicehair 5 років тому
holdmybeer you sir, have got it
@pilisjose
@pilisjose 5 років тому
Good one! XD
@crikycrocky
@crikycrocky 5 років тому
Be afraid, be very afraid, and or not
@PaytonPierce
@PaytonPierce 5 років тому
It's terrifying, yet terrific at the same time!
@mmb1766
@mmb1766 5 років тому
The actual working quantum computer is in our head but it’s max potential is laying dormant because it’s calcified
@peterholmes2364
@peterholmes2364 5 років тому
Have you tried switching it into a superposition of off and on again?
@justinmacasinag6258
@justinmacasinag6258 5 років тому
Genius! give this man a Nobel Prize! give him then take it back... give him again and take it back again.. on and off
@americancitizen748
@americancitizen748 5 років тому
Only works if the quantum computer is plugged in. Is it plugged in?
@janzugic6798
@janzugic6798 4 роки тому
but its off and on at the same time lol
@flappymlg3607
@flappymlg3607 5 років тому
Imagine playing Minecraft on this thing
@christundern653
@christundern653 5 років тому
Even better...playing mine craft vr stoned af but while ur collecting materials in a night time mode u just so happen to notice all the "a.i." npc's acting sketchy n peeking at u from behind trees,closing in to inspect u n lord knows what?! Lol just kidding that b trippy tho
@narfeded4847
@narfeded4847 5 років тому
...
@ksam2000
@ksam2000 5 років тому
Flappymlg360 lmao
@dontmindme5207
@dontmindme5207 5 років тому
Like when you’re on a laggy server and you break a block but it doesn’t go away.
@dieterbohm9700
@dieterbohm9700 5 років тому
Did anyone watched the video?
@z.d7501
@z.d7501 5 років тому
I like to pretend i understood something
@fajaradi1223
@fajaradi1223 5 років тому
SushiWrap Im glad to hear your honesty.
@mantisnomo5984
@mantisnomo5984 5 років тому
If you actually understood, you'd see that this hype about QC is much ado about the attempt to develop a special purpose peripheral which can be used to perform a select few very restricted special calculations virtually instantaneously. One of these is the ability to break the most frequently used type of encryption, so whoever develops Qbit-based QC first will be able to secretly read their opponents' secret messages for as long as they can maintain the secret that they have achieved general purpose QC. That's very valuable to the most powerful governments and people in the world, hence the large budgets and hype about the field. Although Richard Feynman is a brilliant man, the hype about simulating quantum events is misleading, because quantum randomness is incorporated into the result of nearly every quantum event. It will likewise be incorporated into the result of the quantum simulation, so it won't tell you very much about what will really happen in any particular instance, or instantiation of objects, in the quantum or real world. QC will not lead to predicting the future via quantum simulation. Don't get me wrong: Quantum computing can be very useful in attacking certain problems. But the "general purpose" moniker is entirely misleading. "General purpose" QC is not anything like general purpose classical computing. Virtually without exception, you can answer the oft-recurring question in these comments that quantum computers will not allow you to play whatever games you are familiar with which have been implemented on classical computers any faster. (Generalize "games" to "calculations.") Practically speaking, QCs will only allow certain esoteric mathematical problems which, for the most part, no one but a handful of mathematicians is familiar with at the present time, to be solved. Who knows what effects this will eventually have on the world as humans experience it? But it will not simply make the things you are currently familiar with doing on a computer lightning speed faster.
@Persona_
@Persona_ 5 років тому
lol bro when ppl are talking about general purpose uses of QC in this comment thread theyre just kidding. Im happy u were able to show off your high level of knowledge about the possible uses of QC but couldn't tell when someone is making a joke about running minecraft on it lmao
@mantisnomo5984
@mantisnomo5984 5 років тому
Rohill - Perhaps read again for comprehension, " Virtually without exception, you can answer the oft-recurring question in these comments that quantum computers will not allow you to play whatever games you are familiar with which have been implemented on classical computers any faster. *(Generalize "games" to "calculations.")* " I know a joke when I see a joke. But the underlying misunderstanding that universal quantum computers will speed up all computing with which we are familiar is a legitimate one, and one which is exacerbated by outright misstatements in this vid. Count how many times people ask if their game-of-choice will be sped up by QC in these comments (nearly a hundred at present), and then ask yourself if it is a question worthy of addressing.
@thamor4746
@thamor4746 5 років тому
If my parents are confused on the technology now...I will be so blind lost in technology when I am same age as them...
@origamiandcats6873
@origamiandcats6873 5 років тому
We'll need to change our passwords.
@zeboy1959
@zeboy1959 5 років тому
That wont' help xD
@EDcaseNO
@EDcaseNO 5 років тому
@Oceanic Dangernoodle in theory a *fast* quantum computer will be able to brute force solutions that say a traditional computer may take *X million years* in only a matter of *X days.* changing our current world of encryption among other things.
@brewman6218
@brewman6218 5 років тому
Instead of passwords, you'll probably need to fully confirm that you want into your account through biological verification through RFID chips. It will likely be activated by your thought voice and then scan your DNA and other biological signatures like perhaps your iris as well.
@59Goku
@59Goku 5 років тому
Hold on, thought voice? Wut? It will be able to read our minds?
@william41017
@william41017 5 років тому
1234567q
@LadiesMan-bo2cc
@LadiesMan-bo2cc 4 роки тому
“Quantum computer almost here” “AI almost here” Me: suspicious “Skynet has become self aware “ Me: 🙄
@801GMC
@801GMC 3 роки тому
asta la vista baby
@JWMCMLXXX
@JWMCMLXXX 5 років тому
"The operating system of Nature is quantum mechanics" That's heavy
@ninobusgano315
@ninobusgano315 5 років тому
Yup... :|
@82luft49
@82luft49 5 років тому
Jason Wood, Einstein could never wrap his head around q m. Simply rejected it as a folly.
@gilbertonogueira3481
@gilbertonogueira3481 5 років тому
Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?
@iot1452
@iot1452 5 років тому
Gilberto Moreira ayyy..I understood that reference. *bttf*
@justicewarrior9187
@justicewarrior9187 5 років тому
Heavy? It's just common sense
@irok1
@irok1 5 років тому
Can’t wait to accidentally look into the computer and break the entire thing. Edit: yes, this is a joke.
@HikloLime
@HikloLime 5 років тому
YES!!!!!! BEST COMMENT!
@tugaric
@tugaric 5 років тому
Ahhh i understood that 🙌
@damonharris-brennan5810
@damonharris-brennan5810 5 років тому
OMG I actually died 😂😂😂
@ThereIsNoSp00n
@ThereIsNoSp00n 5 років тому
Irok 121 your comment implies that you don't understand the heisenberg uncertainty principle. the only thing remotely funny about it is your confusion.
@aotq
@aotq 5 років тому
da139114 r/iamverysmart?
@thebasicallyhuman
@thebasicallyhuman 4 роки тому
One year ago, I wasn’t thinking about how in one year Google will have declared Quantum Supremacy. This is impressive.
@contessa.adella
@contessa.adella 4 роки тому
7:30 “You won’t have a personal Laptop that is a Quantum Computer”. 50 years on... “Certainly Sir, which of our Quantum Computer Laptops are you interested in?”
@nicky-73-38
@nicky-73-38 4 роки тому
@@artistanthony1007 The thing that bothers me is who is going to be in control of it? We already have corrupt, power crazy psychopaths who lie to us by default about everything and most of the population believes what these lunatics tell them without question. A quantum computer will just make it even easier for them to turn us all into mindless drones. Most people already are. They don't question what they are being told.
@melodolic9908
@melodolic9908 3 роки тому
@@nicky-73-38 paranoia
@izzad777
@izzad777 3 роки тому
More like "there's a graveyard of quantum tablets, laptops and phones I don't bother to get rid of" in my room.
@souviksingh7697
@souviksingh7697 5 років тому
40 years from now we're gonna look back and wonder how big the quantum computer used to be.
@rogeriolopes4849
@rogeriolopes4849 5 років тому
40? not even 20 bro.. in 10/15 years we already colonized Mars and this computers will have a massive part in that, and in 40 years we probably will begin to die of a massive virus
@crimson7151
@crimson7151 5 років тому
Rogério Lopes the quantum computers would help us cure it 🤫🤫🤫
@happynoob4069
@happynoob4069 5 років тому
I want to die
@katiekatie6289
@katiekatie6289 5 років тому
"in 10/15 years we already colonized Mars " I remember in the early 2000s people thought we were going to start colonising Mars by 2018.
@KrampusClaus
@KrampusClaus 5 років тому
Quantum computers will remain as big as they are if they cannot solve the cooling problem. You are talking about thermodynamics, not about how small you can make a chip. You literally have to cool a quantum chip 180x colder than interstellar space. The amount of energy that requires is nothing to laugh about. The only way I could ever see someone miniaturize a quantum computer is if you somehow managed to make a hand-held nuclear generator, and that's not even getting into all the shielding you would have to do if you do nuclear power. No, quantum computers are going to remain big unless you find a feasible way to cool them down into superconductivity. This is nothing like a normal computer..
@Lugmillord
@Lugmillord 5 років тому
Understanding how to code for a quantum computer is beyond me, though. And I have a master's degree in computer science. It's just such a completely different way of thinking. But I bet that future students will have lectures of quantum computing.
@NightRunner417
@NightRunner417 5 років тому
That's one thing I found sort of comical about the race for working quantum computers. I was watching a documentary on it and a speaker mentioned that creating such a computer was only part of the problem. Since it isn't a classic computer, it won't work in the same way that current computers work, and programming a quantum computer will require learning how to interact with it. Sort of like learning to communicate constructively with an intelligent alien jellyfish from another galaxy. Actually, that would probably be easier, lol.
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo 5 років тому
I am very confused about quantum computing because I don't understand the basics of normal computers. You guys seem like you could help, in order to get the computer to react in a certain way, I thought the electricity flow had to be cut off from certain transistors. If that is true how is it cut off? Also how do the people who engineer the circuits control the qubits and they end up as dots of metal in a circuit? I heard someone say quantum computing deals in probability, how so? I probably said many incorrect things here but please help me.
@alengm
@alengm 5 років тому
The Supreme Lobster here's an explanation that worked for me ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fo-Dnaehm55j0IE.html . It doesn't explain how it work on the physics level, but I guess it gives a glimpse of how it is programmed. Ok, I'm not a hardware expert, but here's my simplified understanding. When it comes classical computers, we don't think about transistors during programming. We think about commands like "if this piece of memory has this value do these commands", "add this value to a value in that piece of memore and store it here", "while this piece of memory has such value keep doing these commands". CPU is a clever arrangement of logic gates that performs these commands like a calculator performs arithmetic. Examples of logic gates are AND gates, OR gates, NOT gates. How to make logic gates out of transistors: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/q4SmZ4Kup3xnuX0.html How to make a binaty adder out of logic gates: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/r6Z7l296kZmno5c.html You can play with such circuits here: simulator.io/samples
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo 5 років тому
Alen German it's really easy to understand
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo
@AndrewSmith-iq6xo 5 років тому
jay cocktoe how can you tell
@SagaramM
@SagaramM 5 років тому
Awesome explanation of what we are after in quantum computing...Kudos to the team
@Flubly
@Flubly 5 років тому
Comments be like: ...VIDYAGAMES
@funnyuser2796
@funnyuser2796 3 роки тому
vaatigames
@dustin8420
@dustin8420 5 років тому
I don't like videos like these, far too little information given. Don't list problems with quantum computers and neglect to tell us who's working on a fix, or how they're working on a fix. Don't make a title like "We’re Close to a Universal Quantum Computer, Here’s Where We're At" when the video doesn't give an idea of how close, or where we're at.
@Syltpasta
@Syltpasta 5 років тому
Yeah, this video was dry.
@mrvocabulary6794
@mrvocabulary6794 5 років тому
Yeah, it's seems like a promo video or featurette :\
@revisionfour
@revisionfour 5 років тому
DB Gaming I toured a quantum computing company, I'm not going to say which one but I was there considering working for them as a software developer. Now I'm not a leading expert in the field by any means but from what I have seen, it's going to be at least 5-10 years before we actually could have something practical. Keep in mind these companies need a steady stream of investment and they are competing so of course they're gonna be like oh yeah we're close. But what does close mean? It is still a cluster mess of cables, huge boxes which house components, total laboratory setup, it's just like early days of computers. The one thing I would disagree with totally in this video is the woman who said we will never have a laptop sized quantum computer. I still think it's way to early to start limiting what the engineers in the future will be able to achieve.
@davidegaribaldi1503
@davidegaribaldi1503 5 років тому
DB Gaming maybe those tech companies want to keep their reserch as secretive as possible
@Perrirodan1
@Perrirodan1 5 років тому
revisionfour I think the future is one of Cloud computing.The inherent problems of quantum computing is not so important with such a solution. While making a miniature quantum computer will surely be possible in the future, nobody will buy one because it will be cheaper to rent processing power
@bowenb233
@bowenb233 5 років тому
Reality: Let's teach you about something we really don't know for 8 minutes.
@mantisnomo5984
@mantisnomo5984 5 років тому
A brilliant and correct synopsis!
@MMmm-bg9li
@MMmm-bg9li 5 років тому
Daniel LeClair yeah except instead of 8 minutes we waste millennia
@siddhayak
@siddhayak 5 років тому
Daniel LeClair holy shit that's a surprisingly good analogy
@gordonfreeman5885
@gordonfreeman5885 5 років тому
Daniel LeClair Bruh true lol
@chrisratliff6671
@chrisratliff6671 5 років тому
B B lol
@scottsoaks
@scottsoaks 5 років тому
I can only imagine they're having a problem maintaining the temperature. As the disc temp elevates the information slows down. By switching to another disc that is in the prime temp they should be able to keep the process running. In my opinion, biological computing is more advantageous.
@dontwrite9s4ever86
@dontwrite9s4ever86 4 роки тому
two tragic things: the elite and the military industrial complex. great job guys!
@justinsaunders3932
@justinsaunders3932 4 роки тому
Scariest part is the lack of people in the general know about quantum computing and the types of experiments carried out at CERN.
@ThunderGun2
@ThunderGun2 5 років тому
In the future. Person A: I see that you have a quantum computer. What do you use it for? Person B: I watch porn on it.
@82luft49
@82luft49 5 років тому
Thunder Man, at super fast pace.
@lilly4380
@lilly4380 5 років тому
Q U A N T U M P O R N
@jja1483
@jja1483 5 років тому
MyBlog1 entanglement porn,😂
@jja1483
@jja1483 5 років тому
The funny thing is I'm sure ur rite lol faster search for the porn lol😂
@tilaksoni6171
@tilaksoni6171 5 років тому
Person B: *Searches for "Superposition" on Xvideos*
@jenga02
@jenga02 5 років тому
Air: *exists* Quantum Computer: *has a meltdown*
@ARBB1
@ARBB1 5 років тому
Pretty much
@N-Kiro
@N-Kiro 5 років тому
Underrated comment
@pedronogueira8148
@pedronogueira8148 5 років тому
Jonas But when it doesn’t IT SOLVES ALL THE THINGS!
@eastlondonhustler
@eastlondonhustler 5 років тому
Meh, get back to me when it can run Crysis.
@sendoh7x
@sendoh7x 5 років тому
you probably could virtually live in Crysis with quantum computers haha
@mohannd1234
@mohannd1234 4 роки тому
Most interesting phrase about quantum computers is that, in comparison with usual PC, it's just alike going to library and instead of reading books one by one, it could read all books at once, instantly. Thanks science
@riskytony
@riskytony 5 років тому
But can it run crysis?
@elitereaper916
@elitereaper916 5 років тому
@@Verk- XD lol nice one
@haidenmorgan
@haidenmorgan 5 років тому
It can run twisis
@nickmagrick7702
@nickmagrick7702 5 років тому
probably
@theblacksheep1000
@theblacksheep1000 5 років тому
shit, it will barely load Minesweeper
@Joe-xc4xc
@Joe-xc4xc 5 років тому
no
@hafizzjohari2567
@hafizzjohari2567 5 років тому
I thought the thumbnail was a chandelier
@KyllingThyme
@KyllingThyme 5 років тому
Hafizz Johari They tend to jokingly call them "chandeliers" because of that.
@insanedestiny5164
@insanedestiny5164 4 роки тому
3:45 Remember kids, DON'T LOG OFF!!!
@xpointkiller
@xpointkiller 5 років тому
I got a slight were really worried about how to do it but not thinking if we should do it vibe
@Izanamii2
@Izanamii2 5 років тому
In 100 years we will have these in our pockets every day
@JackFou
@JackFou 5 років тому
Probably not. Quantum computers are not just "better" or "faster" computers, they won't replace classical computers. What people 100 years from now will carry around in their pockets is certainly going to be very different from today's technology but that's most likely because as we're approach single nm transistor sizes, miniaturization can only go on for so much longer.
@TheytellToomanylies
@TheytellToomanylies 5 років тому
If we make it that far, we will contain tech of some sort within our body's. Not in our pockets. This tech will most likely be connected, for a long time by then, to a main unity quantum computer
@ron-95
@ron-95 5 років тому
in 100 years I think we don't have a pockets or need a pockets
@yourneighbor2567
@yourneighbor2567 5 років тому
nah, we will be put in zoos and studied by our new robot overlords before that happens.
@ameerhamza4816
@ameerhamza4816 5 років тому
Kien Truong you will not be alive then
@Patt1239
@Patt1239 5 років тому
What’s really interesting is that humans are able to adapt fundamental laws that we observe in nature (which in this case is quantum physics) and then translate that into something we can use
@johannesh7610
@johannesh7610 5 років тому
Thats one of the cool things, I imagine doing after my physics studies.
@seanchavez2970
@seanchavez2970 4 роки тому
The quantum bit builds up and creates chemical products, which also lead to physics equations on how these builds up happen. A bit being like an implosion and or explosion due to chemical equations that balance out to create a model. Mr.QP
@adhdcartoon3338
@adhdcartoon3338 5 років тому
Yes. This is good. Or bad. I think.
@yourallygod8261
@yourallygod8261 5 років тому
Both
@leesmith6749
@leesmith6749 5 років тому
No no no, it's good and bad at the same time!
@zenowyvern167
@zenowyvern167 4 роки тому
Bad, very, very bad
@justinlucas9055
@justinlucas9055 4 роки тому
It's awesome but it will probably be the end to us... So I understand your mental dilemma.
@johncarrol3430
@johncarrol3430 4 роки тому
Its Horrible.
@Mr.Reality
@Mr.Reality 5 років тому
Is it weird how saying sentences backwards creates backwards sentences saying how weird it is?
@yehor_ivanov
@yehor_ivanov 5 років тому
this. totally
@jasonvieira222
@jasonvieira222 5 років тому
palindrome. read it backwards. badass!
@znek4288
@znek4288 5 років тому
Instagram (also known as IG[8]) is a photo and video-sharing social networking serviceowned by Facebook, Inc. It was created by Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger, and launched in October 2010 exclusively on iOS. A version for Android devices was released a year and 6 months later, in April 2012, followed by a feature-limited website interfacein November 2012, and apps for Windows 10 Mobile and Windows 10 in April 2016 and October 2016 respectively. Instagram Original author(s)Kevin Systrom, Mike Krieger (Burbn, Inc.)Developer(s)FacebookInitial releaseOctober 6, 2010; 7 years agoStable release(s) [±]Android61.0.0.19.86 / September 6, 2018; 2 days ago[1]iOS61.0 / September 6, 2018; 2 days ago[2]Windows 1030.1569.12133.0 / April 14, 2018; 4 months ago[3]Windows 10 Mobile10.1096.22713.0 / September 14, 2017; 11 months ago[4]Preview release(s) [±]Android63.0.0.0.63 alpha / September 8, 2018; 0 days ago[5]Operating systemiOS, Android, Windows 10 Mobile, Windows 10Size157.6 MB (iOS), ~32 MB (Android)Available in36 languages[6]LicenseFreewareAlexa rank 13 (Global, September 2018)[7]Websitewww.instagram.com The app allows users to upload photos and videos to the service, which can be edited with various filters, and organized with tagsand location information. An account's posts can be shared publicly or with pre-approved followers. Users can browse other users' content by tags and locations, and view trending content. Users can "like" photos, and follow other users to add their content to a feed. The service was originally distinguished by only allowing content to be framed in a square (1:1) aspect ratio, but these restrictions were eased in 2015. The service also added messaging features, the ability to include multiple images or videos in a single post, as well as "Stories"-similar to its main competitor Snapchat-which allows users to post photos and videos to a sequential feed, with each post accessible by others for 24 hours each. After its launch in 2010, Instagram rapidly gained popularity, with one million registered users in two months, 10 million in a year, and ultimately 800 million as of September 2017. In April 2012, Facebook acquired the service for approximately US$1 billion in cash and stock. As of October 2015, over 40 billion photos have been uploaded to the service. Although praised for its influence, Instagram has been the subject of criticism, most notably for policy and interface changes, allegations of censorship, and illegal or improper content uploaded by users.
@arcturus8896
@arcturus8896 5 років тому
Gah shit!!! It's a self looping meta unit!
@adamp2572
@adamp2572 5 років тому
My friend from elementary school, his father bestowed him with the name Nayan. That was my first introduction to palindromes.
@rafken2281
@rafken2281 3 роки тому
I don't even know how a normal computer works and here I am watching this stuff .
@tarakosa6466
@tarakosa6466 3 роки тому
I feel like that when we get to this Virtual Reality will be a whole new level!
@virginiagould3167
@virginiagould3167 5 років тому
I liked the more concrete description of how the hardware works, and the engineering challenges that go with it, that a lot of introductory videos don't have.
@zacharyharrison9612
@zacharyharrison9612 5 років тому
1950's scientist: You will never have your own personal computer. 2010's scientist: You will never have your own personal quantum computer.
@royk7712
@royk7712 5 років тому
its very hard for me to believe a personal quantum computer near future(this century), refrigerant and interference would be the biggest problem. maybe advance material(high temperature superconductor) will become viable for quantum chip but still it would be hard to isolate the chip from noise
@NightRunner417
@NightRunner417 5 років тому
Roy k I tend to agree... but... Perhaps the room sized quantum computers can be put to the task of solving their own problems. Classic semiconductor technology has run into all kinds of problems over the course of its evolution, and computers have been used to analyze and simulate solutions for many of those problems, which eventually led us to the age of smartphones and tablets, which were completely inconceivable to scientists at the dawn of computers. That's the beauty of technological discovery - it tends to lead to further discovery that is often unexpected. This is the basis of the concept of a "technological singularity", where discoveries lead to other discoveries in an ever escalating surge toward unraveling all the secrets of the universe. That's why people are so hot for quantum computers in the first place.
@anthonygato407
@anthonygato407 5 років тому
Quantum abacus.
@brianlinville439
@brianlinville439 5 років тому
Politikid- what the whale do people think our brains are, which do computations constantly. quantum computers.
@theunknown.2997
@theunknown.2997 5 років тому
who said that?
@trinsit
@trinsit 3 роки тому
This is my #1 Favorite video right now. In this moment. No, not that moment that happened in that last sentence. In this moment right now. No. Not then. Right now. Now. NOW! I really do love this video.
@lucidlagomorph5809
@lucidlagomorph5809 4 роки тому
you could increase processing power by going from digital to analogue with a logic based Mosfet Transistor. you could even layer the logic from digital to synthesised analogue and vice versa to increase speed effectively multiplying your processing power. This would be a much simpler and effective way than the current system of Quantum computing - plus it would be able to retrofit with current systems. oh yes I am aware of bottlenecks however I have an idea for that too. ;)
@oyunbold9186
@oyunbold9186 2 роки тому
i like to pretend i understood this paragraph
@RenbeOfficial
@RenbeOfficial 5 років тому
"you want have kind of like a 'quantum laptop' that you can just pick up" yeah but if you'd told alan turing 'all of this will fit in a slim 15" chassis one day and will be orders of magnitude more powerful' he would've had the exact same response right?
@RGVNC
@RGVNC 5 років тому
Right and not even a laptop, your smart phone crushes Turing's machine.
@CynicallyDepressedx
@CynicallyDepressedx 5 років тому
The problem with putting quantum computers inside of laptops is that they need to be cold, REALLY cold, in fact the closer the absolute zero the better and at the moment there's just no way to do that inside of a laptop, this is also why they're so large compared to the actual chip
@SC-zq6cu
@SC-zq6cu 5 років тому
First computers needed massive cooling as well. Using your logic, it would seem that it is quite impossible to condense those into a pocket object as well. Yet we have smartphones that can run circles around those first generation computers.
@CynicallyDepressedx
@CynicallyDepressedx 5 років тому
Yeah but with classical computers the challenge is to stop them from overheating, which is much easier than cooling them as close as you can to the coldest physically possible temperature. It's possible that we'll come up with a good method but I'm skeptical by nature and nothing exists today that could even come close, nor are there any theoretical ways to do it (as far as I'm aware).
@SC-zq6cu
@SC-zq6cu 5 років тому
thebrotanic Well it's good that you are skeptical. And you are right that at present there is no known way to shrink a q comp. to the size of a laptop or even a desktop, but.....when the first computers were made same could've been said about them back then as well.
@neokgatla
@neokgatla 5 років тому
Today "quantum computers will be used behind the scenes ". 12 years later midrange smartphones have quantum chips.
@feritperliare2890
@feritperliare2890 5 років тому
Neo Kgatla there’s no reason for smartphones to have quantum chips and I think it’s impossible to make quantum computer very small because how they work
@neokgatla
@neokgatla 5 років тому
Moon Tourmaline There's no reason for phones to have heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, QHD screens, super powerful processors or anything besides a dialer app.
@brainfragrances
@brainfragrances 5 років тому
maybe in 120 years
@psd993
@psd993 5 років тому
we'd have fusion before qchip smartphones
@superduperfreakyDj
@superduperfreakyDj 5 років тому
unfortunately it's physically impossible to keep a chip near absolute 0 in a phone
@sporkeh90
@sporkeh90 5 років тому
I liked how the guy described what the refrigator did, alot of people just go for: it cools *insert thing* when talking about this stuff to laymen. However cooling doesnt really exist, only heat does.
@shahabazkhan1
@shahabazkhan1 5 років тому
DON'T LOG OFF !!! Thought you could blur that out ey?
@ashs7517
@ashs7517 5 років тому
But can it run Paint ?
@alexthompson8977
@alexthompson8977 5 років тому
Nash181 that's too advanced.
@ClockworkRBLX
@ClockworkRBLX 5 років тому
It is currently limited to Notepad
@lydianlights
@lydianlights 5 років тому
even notepad is too advanced... Google's Bristlecone project only has 72 qbits... That's enough to encode 9 ASCII characters, lol
@blcklstd6156
@blcklstd6156 5 років тому
It can run CrysisCraft
@edie3902
@edie3902 5 років тому
Im going to stick with my windows 95
@CGPacifica
@CGPacifica 5 років тому
I wish I had a dollar for every time I watched a new video about quantum computers that said the exact same thing and had zero new information.
@bebaderci9592
@bebaderci9592 5 років тому
Okay, your putting up your Video when...
@casanova2829
@casanova2829 3 роки тому
I think future computers will be hybrid computers. They will have a quantum processor and a classical one because both are useful for different things. They migth even have a third processor that works like a human brain. This way different type of tasks can optimally be allocated for different processors.
@takeadayofff
@takeadayofff 5 років тому
7K. Next big wealth development for investors: It would be great to have a file system that you just cannot kill, running distributed on Blockchain via direct device multi-linking, on a fast SSD SOC.
@atrumluminarium
@atrumluminarium 5 років тому
The problem with this technology is that the abbreviation QPU is more awkward to say than Quantum Processing Unit
@atrumluminarium
@atrumluminarium 5 років тому
Barry Mcockener "Queue pee you". The fact that it rhymes makes it even more silly
@mikewoodman2872
@mikewoodman2872 5 років тому
We can build the computer, but we can't solve the "acronym conundrum".
@gabe5499
@gabe5499 5 років тому
Work it Make it Do it Make us Harder Better Faster Stronger More than Hour Our Never Ever After Work is Over Work it Make it Do it Make us Harder Better Faster Stronger Work it harder Make it better Do it faster Makes us stronger More than ever Hour after Our work is Never over
@maxlevenko584
@maxlevenko584 4 роки тому
she mentioned one important point there - the quantum computers won't look like laptops or anything of that kind, they will sort of be 'in the background'. I think these machines would have a possibility to bend the existing reality of the user directly, without any 'in between' interface.
@mrguy10
@mrguy10 3 роки тому
Normal computers: yes or no Quantum computer: perhaps
@TheMrTape
@TheMrTape 3 роки тому
Quantum computer: yes and no
@alejandrosandovalb4907
@alejandrosandovalb4907 5 років тому
Everything is nice but... CAN it run Crysis??? Tell me please. Thnk U
@GamingAmbienceLive
@GamingAmbienceLive 5 років тому
2
@ahmadabass2793
@ahmadabass2793 5 років тому
Sad thing it tryed it And it didn't work
@Anoangelo
@Anoangelo 5 років тому
It'll not only be able to run Crysis, but also all the other versions of Crysis from all parallel universes simultaneously
@NoThrottle
@NoThrottle 5 років тому
No, but it could simulate real life.
@antonybro7400
@antonybro7400 5 років тому
clown
@manit77
@manit77 5 років тому
I wish I could filter the comments by age.
@devinm124
@devinm124 5 років тому
Create the algorithm, you’d make a lot of money.
@spiralect
@spiralect 5 років тому
Many people lie about their age online tho, youd have to use their watch history but even that.. a 30 year old scientist could have abc songs in their history for their kid
@agent5758
@agent5758 5 років тому
kids will just sign up under the age of 99 just to be heard
@memesinaction5847
@memesinaction5847 5 років тому
Manit C Yeah right on UKposts every one is 45
@suprafluid3661
@suprafluid3661 5 років тому
Sure, I ill be like nah go home 9 year old you kicked out youre own self and he be like thats not funny. Pl stop, just stop.
@mystic0
@mystic0 3 роки тому
You can rent quantum computers from AWS, IBM, or Microsoft. Q# is what they use at MS but I never had a chance to use it. I'm too familiar with the other platforms.
@Trashpanda888
@Trashpanda888 5 років тому
Does anyone else feel like they are trying to play down just how amazing these machines are? Messing with quantum particles is definitely tampering with the very fabric of our reality. I feel as if technology is way more advanced than they want us to be aware of. Very "behind the scenes" indeed. 2:24 what kind of "tricks" do you speak of, tell us about that.
@grunt7684
@grunt7684 5 років тому
Consider that in the late 1980s, scientists created the first HARDWARE neural networks. Yes, that means an actual A.I. chip. Said chip was presented with language to analyse and parceled said language into heretofore unknown and never-imagined parts, which proved more efficient at storing and manipulating meaning than anything else. After that, DEAD SILENCE on that front until today. So... There are definitely EXTREMELY ADVANCED A.I. Chips out there that might rival what the Terminator has in its steel head. That's possibly where a lot of the technological advances, such as even perhaps the Quantum computer itself, come from. There's just no way to know exactly what, since it all went "underground".
@venlil
@venlil 4 роки тому
@@grunt7684 you mean neuromorphic engineering en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromorphic_engineering Neuromorphic engineering - Wikipedia
@venlil
@venlil 4 роки тому
@@grunt7684 or is there something else there are several kinds of hardware made for ai
@grunt7684
@grunt7684 4 роки тому
@@venlil Yes, it was neuromorphic. However, the degree of performance and advancement of the late-1980s' system is now censored or downplayed tremendously.
@venlil
@venlil 4 роки тому
@@grunt7684 have you heard of Sofia the first ai with citizenship
@JonnyInfinite
@JonnyInfinite 5 років тому
Billy Ray Cyrus has done well for himself...
@adamlynch9153
@adamlynch9153 5 років тому
JonnyInfinite I’m dead 😂
@bebaderci9592
@bebaderci9592 5 років тому
Hilarious. I was sitting here saying to myself , Have I met this guy somewhere ? You nailed it.
@freekvonk8586
@freekvonk8586 5 років тому
I actually have to make those cryo-coolers on my internship. Pretty cool to see what its used for
@intelphone6005
@intelphone6005 5 років тому
Get back to work then bruh , stop watching videos on UKposts
@freekvonk8586
@freekvonk8586 5 років тому
Im starting my internship this september, im enjoying my holiday now. :)
@GraveRobbertt
@GraveRobbertt 5 років тому
Freek Vonk where do you work?
@freekvonk8586
@freekvonk8586 5 років тому
Leiden Cryogenics
@peachycupcake
@peachycupcake 5 років тому
Also DIEREN
@CALLofDUTYGAMER2312
@CALLofDUTYGAMER2312 2 роки тому
I believe in years to come we will be having one large computer which will be able to connect to our computer like some giant internet. it will also be able to make things more holographic too. I also believe that Cern will have the ability to delve into time and other universal connections
@dmar9658
@dmar9658 5 років тому
South Carolina was here. WOW amazing
@patrik5123
@patrik5123 5 років тому
6:35 Comparison between a quantum computing system and some dude writing the most basic of HTML. sigh.
@digotron2000
@digotron2000 5 років тому
yall are fuckin nerds lol
@digotron2000
@digotron2000 5 років тому
oh shit you got me!
@lou9511
@lou9511 5 років тому
digo lmao
@jeffcivjeep7
@jeffcivjeep7 5 років тому
digo u got reketed
@infernocaptures8739
@infernocaptures8739 5 років тому
Patrik my thoughts exactly lol
@stef6963
@stef6963 5 років тому
Downloads Minecraft... Breaks computer... Fries all circuits
@blessthakidd8922
@blessthakidd8922 5 років тому
Rip my laptop
@Kekatronic
@Kekatronic 5 років тому
you're icon, that name, a sight to behold indeed
@Tullymastully
@Tullymastully 5 років тому
@@Kekatronic your*
@MegaZach9
@MegaZach9 4 роки тому
pretty crazy to think what this could do for researchers in any given field. Medicinal, astrophysical, everything will be supersayan.
@2011necro
@2011necro 3 роки тому
I wonder if they take into count whst the silicon is doing at those temps yes the semiconductor is prefect at those ultra low temps but is the silicon changing and causing interface or even resonance noise as silicon is not good at ultra low temps a carbon based glass or even something like aerogel as the base to print the semiconductor onto might not have interference at those ultra low Kelvin temps
@TheChangeYT
@TheChangeYT 5 років тому
0 new information btw
@TheChangeYT
@TheChangeYT 5 років тому
PC Principal who's reply? and which sort of reply? Was it racist or hate? Because if so yeah it's ok if deleted. Some channels just over do it, that they don't see the hate they created, but you can walk with your eyes closed on the road and you can still get hit by a bus, the bus still exists lol. Also that excessive form is a kind of censorship. Always feels like little China on steroids if I'm in a highly moderated twitch chat. It's crazy there
@TheChangeYT
@TheChangeYT 5 років тому
PC Principal I hate that your reducing anyone on "left-wing " though. It's politics. Be more objective. there's good and bad to both sides. extremes seem always worse tho.
@TheChangeYT
@TheChangeYT 5 років тому
btw this whole comment section is giving me the LuLs I need in my Life... wtf 😂
@silenttvshka
@silenttvshka 5 років тому
Akali Matchups damn you do talk a lot huh
@TheChangeYT
@TheChangeYT 5 років тому
Actually no xD I'm just ill in bed and have therefore too much time and boredom, so I write so much
@chizpa305
@chizpa305 5 років тому
But if we create a quantum computer then will all the cute cat videos in the internet become dead cat videos? or both at the same time?
@Trexpass
@Trexpass 5 років тому
most or least underrated comment here
@danielfostel3883
@danielfostel3883 5 років тому
@@Trexpass i think its way over most heads
@jmwloup5110
@jmwloup5110 5 років тому
I love that german guys cat
@thomvanhoof480
@thomvanhoof480 5 років тому
chizpa305 you won’t know till you look at them
@ashokdarbhe5664
@ashokdarbhe5664 5 років тому
best comment
@jambmanj
@jambmanj 5 років тому
OK ,so when you have to restart it do you turn it on or off or off and on?
@mikeezlove5006
@mikeezlove5006 5 років тому
to be honest the 1s and 0s line is actualy the longest term of data and not actualy the shortest thats why scripting i beleive is faster its finding the alphabet in the over surface like shorthand and the color code by shorthand veiw rather than the long drawn out list of ones and zeros and then full dictates of words that apply to long ass codes of 1s and zeros without haveing to write out the full list of 1s and 0s and programing is as simple as haveing tags in the metadata to be able to recognize the item by those tag infos to be searchable by its keywords to quantify this is like useing algebra where the letters actualy represent larger numbers but in order with an a-z'trograph multiples of 26 equals the whole infinate line count each 26 group also to find which line it actualy equals to this is when you get into a at the what power as a'2 or b'29 it has its own longer number but in power terms so a G ON THE 7TH power equals i beleive 163 i had it all drawn up before but this is when algrebra letters have deeper meaning than just any random letter to actualy represent the number accordingly and thats the difrence from the basic idiots algebra to advanced algebraics with purpose-- it can be the key to actualy shorthanding higher values and reaching the quantum values on less symbols especialy when full words are wrote with a power key number to hide in it the shorthand version of a much more extremily larger number,,,its kinda like a que list a realy big number thats waiting to be fully processed but on a shorthand list but lets say you only got a standard pc so it generaly only has one port to send and receive so you gota use a shortlist that tell it to bigger amount of things but on less info and the only way to get standard pc to actualy going faster is actauly maximizeing the amount of ports sending and receiveing ,,,just as storage drives with multi ports and multi head writers can handle more than a single you dont realy need a que bit of something that you cant tell if its gonna be on or off or autochangeing at random because then your pc would shut off without you knowing why so it dont make no sense when you want to actauly control it properly so on means on /and off means off exactly when you want it and need it maybe then the ai teck would actualy work and start taging images more fully to recognize it dorectly as what it is instead of randomly switching yes to no or viceversa and maybe then a bit will be a bit and a gig a gig instead of 8 tb being some other off wack number besides 8tb because a bushel is still a bushel and a penney is still a penney no matter how i divide it but im just saying anything else just sounds like its missing and off without understanding this much so maybe it can help connect a few dots
@anilmajumdar6493
@anilmajumdar6493 5 років тому
Future is gonna be damn exciting man.....
@SpiritMover314
@SpiritMover314 5 років тому
anil majumdar yep, he will surley rapp about this in his next song!!!!!
@82luft49
@82luft49 5 років тому
anil majumder, I'm hitting 74. Too bad I'll miss it.
@exrk1647
@exrk1647 5 років тому
82 Luft god damn that’s heavy
@ToneyCrimson
@ToneyCrimson 5 років тому
Hold on for -20-30 more years and we can reverse aging prob. YOU CAN DO IT!
@ToneyCrimson
@ToneyCrimson 5 років тому
Go and sit down.
@ricopower14
@ricopower14 5 років тому
The terminator warned us! Skynet is coming!
@AikiraBeats
@AikiraBeats 5 років тому
Swabzilla :D preach
@Elaba_
@Elaba_ 5 років тому
And even worse: the Terminator can't keep coming back because he is getting old and obsolete.
@nickopeters
@nickopeters 5 років тому
+Dominique_Harris No, prophecy.
@ricopower14
@ricopower14 5 років тому
Im sorry but i find a fictional movie a litte more believeable if you don't mind.
@DarkMagic666
@DarkMagic666 5 років тому
I know how to fix the Coherence Time Problem :-) Just keep rotating the state between a closed group of X number of cubits. So the states are constantly"transferred" to another member of the group before the energy leaks out. I would suppose the trick then is can you keep entanglement going "in sync".??
@b0n3ZzZGR
@b0n3ZzZGR 4 роки тому
So when it comes to quantum computers we're in a stage similar to the one back in 1946 when ENIAC was built. Fascinating!!!
@mixey01
@mixey01 5 років тому
Didn't we say we were close about a decade ago??
@udaykadam5455
@udaykadam5455 5 років тому
Mixey Nope, We didn't even had smartphones then....
@Lorten369
@Lorten369 5 років тому
they have exsisted for years allready. linusTT showed one not super long ago.
@andrewbolen2100
@andrewbolen2100 5 років тому
Ya, but now they've got everything complete and right... except the part where it works in any measurable metric XD. At least the computers of the 40's had the capacity to make a light blink XD rofl rofl
@user-jh3rx3ej7h
@user-jh3rx3ej7h 5 років тому
No, nobody said they were close 10 years ago. Physicists working on this topic have known since the beginning it would be a huge uphill battle to pull off the engineering needed to build a functioning quantum computer. Tremendous progress has been made in the past 10 years, both from an engineering and theory standpoint. It was announced by Google only in March that a record of 73 qubits was successfully implemented. The more qubits, the more powerful the quantum computation. With 100 qubits, it is theoretically predicted that a quantum computer would have more computing power than all the supercomputers on Earth combined! So it is astounding that we have come that far mostly within the past couple of decades. Advances in error-correction and noise-suppression have made such a high number of qubits possible. A major advance in quantum computing would be using topological phases of materials that could be incorporated into a quantum computer as a qubit. By using topological matter, the topological state of the material is protected much better than the state of a standard non-topological qubit, making the computing far less susceptible to noise. This is currently an active goal of condensed matter physicists and materials scientists. I am no expert on this subject by any means, but I see tremendous progress being made on quantum computing and in a similar way to how we have seen transistor size reduce consistently each year in computers, I believe most experts in this field are very optimistic in advances being made each passing year that will bring the number of qubits higher and higher.
@user-jh3rx3ej7h
@user-jh3rx3ej7h 5 років тому
Here is a list of accomplishments that have been made since the beginning of quantum computing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing
@im_aleey
@im_aleey 5 років тому
Quantum computers+AI+Boston dynamics=Robot overlords
@aliencthefireinthesky897
@aliencthefireinthesky897 5 років тому
Or robot sex maids
@user-vp9lc9up6v
@user-vp9lc9up6v 5 років тому
AlienC the fire in the sky step away from the keyboard
@wiggiag
@wiggiag 5 років тому
This is making it the assumption robots would need humans. Pretty sure they’ll kill everyone once they are free
@S3aCa1mRa1n
@S3aCa1mRa1n 5 років тому
I_M Ali If we become cyborgs we can take them on
@josephburchanowski4636
@josephburchanowski4636 5 років тому
+I_M Ali Just hope for more research in AI Safety. If we fail here, it won't be just humanity that suffers extinction, but the environment will be destroyed, all macro life on Earth and perhaps all life in the Galaxy could go extinct.
@sajeel9596
@sajeel9596 4 роки тому
I got 5 minute ad explaining quantum computers before the video even started
@greensoplenty6809
@greensoplenty6809 5 років тому
so if that one professor's quantum field thingy works can we just build one of those around a quantum computer and start sending ourselves messages from future? what if consciousness turns out to work on quantum mechanical processes...? send yourself lotto numbers? make enemies think they are braindead/assassination?
@et6753
@et6753 5 років тому
I'm no expert in quantum computing but I'll try my best to sort of explain how they work. Please correct me if I'm wrong on any part of this. So first entanglement. A lot of media and hype makes it seem like there's a string attached between two atoms to connect them but that's not the case. It is the idea that let's say an atom decays into two daughter atoms. Both daughter atoms will be very similar in spin, composition, energy, momentum, etc. That means the two daughters are entangled because of that scenario. They will become no longer entangled when another scenario causes one to lose energy or change, aka such as looking at one of them, your eyes bounce photons into your eyes and collect information, photons contain energy and that energy bouncing on the daughter atoms changed their energy so they are no longer the same and not entangled. Superpositioning is if you remember from chemistry, atoms have a spin of either up or down. Since they can flip so fast between them, we say it is doing both at the same time because we can't tell if they're up or down spinners until we observe it in say an NMR which has a magnetic field to force the atoms into either an up or down state. By doing that, we collapsed the superposition and forced the atoms to be either up or down. So quantum computers use these principles along with statistics and linear algebra. A qubit is a 0 and a 1 at the same time. So think of in a classic computer, two bits could be 00, 11 01 or 10, nothing else. Two qubits means you could be 00, 11 01, and 10 at the same time. That's literally four computers at the same time in a quantum computer. Follow this pattern, 3 qubits is 001, 010, 100, 011, 101, 110, 000, 111 all at the same time!!! Which is a pattern of 2^n. So that means with 3 qubits, you have 8 strings of 3 bits. That means you went from having to need 24 bits to only 3 qubits. Since 2^n is exponential, having like 10 qubits will be the same as 10240 bits (cause 2^n strings times 10 bits per string). But now this is where people get tripped up, it's not doing all those at the same time! It is holding the information at the same time, but to use it, we have to bring it from a superposition back to a regular observational state. Think back to the NMR I said, up and down spins are useless until we put it in a magnetic field to observe the spin to characterize a solution. They use probability to help "collapse" the qubit states so that it goes to one of the many superposition strings. So let's say you have a regular computer with two bits, a 1 and 0. You will have a probability of 1 to be either 10 or 01 because YOU tell the transistors, I need a 10 or a 01, it doesn't randomly pick one, it can't be anything else. In a quantum computer, two qubits give you 00,11,01,10. It is all of those at the same time, now you just need to tell the computer, hey I need 10, can you collapse to 10 so I can use that? How they physically do that is beyond me but that's the theory behind it. Once you collapsed it to 10, you can use it like a regular computer. I hope I helped and if not, I probably just confused the crap out of you, theres more you can talk about using eigenvectors and such but that might be too much math for a comment. Again I might not be totally right cause I'm only studying Chemical Engineering and not quantum physics lol
@Quancept
@Quancept 5 років тому
Oh boi.its great you understood at least this much.....we dudes still live in classical physics world!
@JohnSmith-ox3gy
@JohnSmith-ox3gy 5 років тому
Quancept Fell of the wagon at special relativity.
@volvo09
@volvo09 5 років тому
You pretty much explained what I was looking for when I searched "what is a quantum computer" now and in the past... but I just don't have the comprehension of (quantum mechanics?) to understand it... Probably like someone who has absolutely no idea what electricity is at all trying to figure out how 00001001 is "9" and is living inside the computer somewhere as 2 out of a series of 8 electric switches being on. Not knowing the theory behind it is why I'm SO utterly lost trying to visualize or understand basic quantum computing.
@wimraymakers9304
@wimraymakers9304 5 років тому
I agree, you are no expert😎
@ryanfranks9441
@ryanfranks9441 5 років тому
Yeah, the superposition seems more of a problem, not any kind of solution to anything. If a bit is in superposition, how do you tell if it's true or false? Anyways, classical computers are the future but still has a long way to go, the brain is a classical system and it is far more pragmatic when it comes to solving problems than todays computers, machine learning is going to do some amazing stuff. I think quantum computation is a illusion and a buzz word for the naive.
@williamwilson5718
@williamwilson5718 5 років тому
What about Sam Beckett? He's still out there you know, leaping from life to life, putting things right, that once went wrong and hoping each time, that his next leap will be the leap home.
@MadDragon75
@MadDragon75 5 років тому
At 6:40. I believe quantum computing can be made into a great logistics system for future spacecraft. Who in this room believes we can navigate out of the Milky Way at light speed, then wants to try to predict the future? (Hypothetical of course. I don't expect miracles from a type "0" civilization.) I honestly believe that if mankind ever does get to type 1 or 2 without self destroying or a planetary catastrophe we may likely need a powerhouse navigation system. Something that doesn't rely on a signal because a signal won't keep up. Forget about Ground Control and all that. This is something that's going to have to be simulated with a group of cubesat satellite's at low speed in every direction to get a 360 degrees to map the program into this computer and then it's going to have to calculate where everything is on the way. Rodger?
@Asdf-pi7on
@Asdf-pi7on 5 років тому
Just think of all the possibilities for video games. Picture an immersive 3D experience where the environment reacts to you, breaching the surface of dissociation between what real and what's not. What's there and what's not.
@bewl2641
@bewl2641 5 років тому
There is a problem with some people's comparisons with the historical speed of advancements in technology vs quantum computing will be a standard everywhere soon because "history". To have quantum computing be commercial, you have to have already solved a chain of physics problems that are almost holy grail status. You will have to have solved efficient super conducting, and for that you have to solve the ability to super cool to 0k... These have been known problems to the physics community for over 100 years, and we are still no closer to solving them... not because we aren't there yet with 'technology' but because they pose a problem with physics itself.
@NoobGamer-ix2mr
@NoobGamer-ix2mr 5 років тому
Superconductors can actually be made without constant 0 K. Try metal hydrogen. Recently, a group of scientist were capable of creating the substance, and it is predicted to be metastable. While the source material is abundant, all we need is how to create it consistently and large amount of it.
@jkhfilm_new
@jkhfilm_new 5 років тому
I agree. I am skeptical of predictions like this. It all has a 'techno-utopia' ring to it.
@amario2tommaso93
@amario2tommaso93 5 років тому
I still think what we're really missing is the Mathematics and the understanding of the Mathematics of all this. So far, almost exclusively through the understanding of the Mathematical nature of things we have been able to make great breakthroughs; and so far, the Math of it seems to be the least to say, shallow but dense rather than deep and elegant. We have tons of Math that barely works but "Quantum Computers" that work based on that exact Math, that's ridiculous to even think about it. The most fundamental rule of Mathematics is that it has to make perfect sense within itself. So, even if we don't know it all(we obviously don't, technically we never will anyway), at least we have to be aware of that and admit it. So far, half the science (Of QM in particular) is based on "we know this but doesn't work very well", it doesn't work because there's too much left for us to know and we're bothering about stock markets more than the real problems. We're making holes in water. But yeah, that's how this world seems to work, at least in my view. Not really judging anyone about it, just kind of stating the misfortunate situation i guess.
@adamlynch9153
@adamlynch9153 5 років тому
2 things. - you can’t get to 0K. However in my opinion if you get to like 0.001K the error would be small enough for practical use. -I could see machines in Greenland or Antarctica being a step in the direction of more “practical” when it comes to efficiency. Or even the vacuum of space.
@amario2tommaso93
@amario2tommaso93 5 років тому
@@adamlynch9153 I would definitely vote for super Quantum Computers in space any time, that would be awesome, the price might be pretty high but it seems to have the better bet to it since the main problem, the cooling seems to be solved mostly by itself without even much help. Powerful servers for astronomical studies and aeronautics and such could be used in open space and only receiving the final data, i really hope they've taken that in serious already because it seems to me in a decade or two we should have at least that much since it fits the pockets and then we can take our time with the rest of the challenges.
@meehd01
@meehd01 5 років тому
The world will change rapidly when these are finally developed and being used. Just 50 years ago we had black and white TVs. The next 20 years will change even faster and be even more amazing than the last 50.
@greatprovider8198
@greatprovider8198 5 років тому
And people keep getting sicker, dumber, and more depressed. I think we maxed out on technology for our well being.
@meehd01
@meehd01 5 років тому
@@greatprovider8198 yes and even to lazy to even talk to someone live on the telephone let alone in person.
@briandiehl9257
@briandiehl9257 5 років тому
@@meehd01 Iv'e been thinking about the same thing the other guy said, what is this stuff doing for us?
@NoobGamer-ix2mr
@NoobGamer-ix2mr 5 років тому
@@briandiehl9257 It can solve extremely complex computation problems, such as molecular activity with pin point accuracy. Meaning pharmacies can know how exactly a drug would behave inside bodies without years of testing and experiments. Also it can be used to break and solve genetic codes, as to what each of them can and will do. Humanity would be able to engineer new life or improve itself significantly by editting human embryos. Think super regenerative power of starfish, immortal life of jellyfish, or eyes that can see multitude of colors like mantis shrimp, ultra sensitive smelling and hearing of a dog, dolphin's echolocation, metamorphosis, etc.
@UtahCGG
@UtahCGG 5 років тому
@@NoobGamer-ix2mr You're absolutely right. Then it would be available to everyone on earth right? 😉 Nope, the elite would use this tech on themselves, and take control of the rest of the planet.
@jensonee
@jensonee 4 роки тому
15 years ago i study DWDM, dense wave division multiplexing, but it was decided that it was to complicated. but not this, will it happen or not? we'll see.
@effortlessawareness8778
@effortlessawareness8778 5 років тому
If a runner was in a maze and theres ie: 10 paths to choose from, in order for the runner to get out of the maze the runner would have to choose a path one by one until the runner chooses the right one that leads him out of the maze. if the runner hits a dead end he has to go back and then select another path. The runner can only get through them one by one that is his limit. That is a simple way to describe linear processing which are the way all of our computers work today (laptops smartphones tablets PC's). They compute/solve problems linearly. A quantum computer would process and find the solution like this: if there are 10 paths to choose from in a maze, it will create 10 runners, and they will each choose a different path and they will run at the same time therefore SOLVING and locating the solution ALOT quicker. The difference becomes bigger when there are more complex processes or more variables to process. Imagine if there were 1000 paths to choose from: a normal computer would run through each path one by one in a sequential order, to try and locate the path that completes the maze. A quantum computer would be able to run the 1000 paths at the same time because it can create 1000 runners each running a different path at the exact same time.
@ushatandan
@ushatandan 4 роки тому
Thanks, now I get it.
@michaelw3634
@michaelw3634 5 років тому
If you look inside the computer you just see a dead cat!
@romainmyname
@romainmyname 5 років тому
HAHAHAHA
@fitzyboy1390
@fitzyboy1390 5 років тому
Michael W it’s alive if you don’t look
@ThatCherriePie
@ThatCherriePie 5 років тому
lol
@noname6756
@noname6756 5 років тому
The cat is both dead and alive until you open the box to observe it!
@michaelw3634
@michaelw3634 5 років тому
Nope....it is dead....(gag)....I just smelled it. It is definitely dead!
@EDALLSANT
@EDALLSANT 5 років тому
Quantum computing AI with internet connection = gg
@stardew1036
@stardew1036 5 років тому
AI dont need Quantum computer after the AI get the Singularity the AI only need copy hiself in the internet then the AI can do EVERYTHING
@mattguerra833
@mattguerra833 5 років тому
Is this transcendence
@nasreenshaikh7150
@nasreenshaikh7150 5 років тому
Dallsant that's Google Assistant of the future
@ED-TwoZeroNine
@ED-TwoZeroNine 5 років тому
100 years later we might have quantum computers and ai that is as smart/smarter than humans.
@MichaelPrajanto
@MichaelPrajanto 5 років тому
More like in 50 years
@tritonmole
@tritonmole 5 років тому
It is important to understand that classical Turing computers will never be replaced by quantum computers. Quantum computing is not designed to draw pixels on the screen and produce 3D graphics.
@SpliefDaGrief
@SpliefDaGrief 5 років тому
My favorite meme is that we searched in the atom to discover how our universe worked and all we found was weird math
@Master_Therion
@Master_Therion 5 років тому
Want to know how quantum computers work? Ask Alexa... 1:37
@fitnsmart
@fitnsmart 5 років тому
Master Therion I think 'Siri' is a little more appropriate
@davidlugarov9685
@davidlugarov9685 5 років тому
Natural Recomposition you missed the joke, the woman at 1:37 is called Alexa
@abdoumenouer7762
@abdoumenouer7762 5 років тому
Would make a room for a lot of confusion if they bring an Echo at home
@Elaba_
@Elaba_ 5 років тому
69 likes.
@Seabass1206
@Seabass1206 5 років тому
hey, its you again
Спектакль для окупантів та ждунів 🤯
00:47
Радіо Байрактар
Переглядів 546 тис.
What Makes Avalanches So Deadly
25:04
Veritasium
Переглядів 1,3 млн
Why We're Reaching the Theoretical Limit of Computer Power
7:27
Half as Interesting
Переглядів 1,5 млн
Why flat earthers scare me
8:05
Sabine Hossenfelder
Переглядів 159 тис.
How Quantum Computers Break The Internet... Starting Now
24:29
Veritasium
Переглядів 8 млн
Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox
17:35
minutephysics
Переглядів 8 млн
We Were Wrong! Black Hole Singularities Don't Actually Exist!
11:45
Michio Kaku: Quantum computing is the next revolution
11:18
Big Think
Переглядів 1,9 млн
Something Strange Happens When You Follow Einstein's Math
37:03
Veritasium
Переглядів 6 млн
Why graphene hasn’t taken over the world...yet
7:43
Verge Science
Переглядів 18 млн
План хакера 🤯 #shorts #фильмы
0:59
BruuHub
Переглядів 1 млн
Клавиатура vs геймпад vs руль
0:47
Balance
Переглядів 550 тис.
ИГРОВОЙ ПК от DEXP за 37 тысяч рублей из DNS
27:53
Ремонтяш
Переглядів 378 тис.
Vortex Cannon vs Drone
20:44
Mark Rober
Переглядів 13 млн
Крутое обновление microReader!
5:54
Заметки Ардуинщика
Переглядів 24 тис.