Welp we never know what dinosaurs actually looklike

Yeah, this is so bad

They failed so hard that I want all 25 minutes of my life back. I can't take these nu-males seriously anymore.

The t-Rex had feathers

Only clicked on because in the thumbnail original looked better. Theres in the thumbnail looks to glossy where as the orignal looks realistic and gritty.

It's hard for people to imagine now just how groundbreaking the effects in Jurassic Park were for the time. I had just graduated from highschool in 93, had been doing 3D animation for a couple years, and my dream in life was to work for ILM as a SFX artist. I went to see Jurassic Park that summer and I was absolutely dumbfounded. I went back to the theater 3 more times to watch it, just to look at the effects.

@@MrJacobegg what i don't understand is that how is it possible that we have almost downgraded on The quality of cg of these massive movies as example Hobbit trilogy.

@@MrJacobegg i was 8 XD

@@tomtomi93 I think it’s mostly good decisions regarding what to show and what to hide, what to do practically and what to do digitally. If you look at certain “making of” videos, they show the different tricks they used to hide issues with the technology. One example was setting the first T-Rex scene on a dark and rainy night so that we never got a clear enough look to identify it as a cartoon.

Well the reason it looks and feel so real it’s because they used a mix of both practical and computer animation

Bruh facts 😂

you nailed it... corridor in a nutshell lmao

Hahahahaha I see what u did there.

Best comment

Animators finds a way

True. Very true. But this is terrible CGI lmao.

Yep, that's the first thing I noticed as well, the lighting is good, the model could be improved, but the motion.... Hey Pete, do you have a tail?

It's always the animation that gives way

And neck looks too stiff. Feels like head hanging from the stick. But again, they did a great job and the time, budget and resource limits.

Swing in the hips? You mean like those you do in your furry pron sexy walks, mr animator?

And that is the number 1 reason why Jurassic Park looks better than Jurassic World. The animation. The first movie really nail the speed and weight of the animals while Jurassic World ends up almost cartoonish with extremely loose and floaty fast motion.

Lol yeah I was thinking the same. This is good for just a couple days worth or work but it still looks like a miniature. Kudos to the OG crew

That's how their remake projects usually go.

That’s what they said at the end of the video. So timeless, you really just appreciate the care put into. I could rewatch the movie millions of times and still be just as shocked as the first time I saw it.

And how incompetent this channel is at making vfx.

thats why i loved the n64 console ,its graphics chip is based off the same silicon engine processor used in these early 90s movies especially the workstation SGI the likes of Rareware used for their 3d graphics and wireframe sprites

*shit What's with the cringey self-censoring? You wanna gold star from mommy for being a good boy...? oÔ

It's truly a masterpiece... At the time we thought we were just beginning with how great CGI could be, but honestly the more time passes the more I'm starting to think the climax was back then

They tried a miniature version as an omage to the old ways people used to make movies like in the old Godzilla movies, They also had a small time and budget

@@Jordan-se2ph and with all of that said, the final product was truly awful. I can’t believe they published this production.

I concur. As a 15 yo, I watched JP on VHS every night for weeks thinking how in the heck they made everything look so real & to this day I still can't tell what was CGI & what wasn't. Documentaries can say what they want but I really can't tell at all & that's what is truly wonderful about that movie.

Agreed

@@kyucklebeans 30 years later the original Jurassic Park still holds up

It does! Very Harryhausen

The animation is laughably bad.

Movement is clunky. 1993 is still incredible.

This is literally fanmade, the original was a million dollar project that took years to make.

@@maxonite What is impressing people with this is that the JP technology is over 30 years old. With the massive leap of CGI in 30 years you would think they could not only match it but beat it. But in fact all they have done is a 1960's style stop motion. Which just gives so much credit to ILM and what they did 3 decades ago. It goes to show no matter how much CGI you have or computer power, sheer talent and creativity will always win!!. JP is testimony to this! Credit to the UKpostsrs for making this video they have just highlighted how amazing ILM was back in the day.

Alright, Thats a little far, You aren't wrong though

HAHAHAHAH!!! So true. The movement looks horrendous, the street lamp is completely out of place.

😭😭😭

It wasnt even close. Ive seen better animation in stop motion movies and even fan-made stop motion with toys. Heck even i did better visual work as a 10 year old with my Jurassic Park toys in the garden and an oldschool camera.

Lmao so mean

Fr

That’s because is animatronic not CGI

@@martinrh76 the scene it breaks the cables is not

@@martinrh76 they used both. It worked because the animatronics and cgi were done masterfully by brilliant artists. That’s the beauty of what they achieved in the original, particularly in the night time sequences like this one.

@@martinrh76 how can you say that the paddock breakout scene was fully animtronic? Wtf?! So ridiculous

Cant agree more

They’re extinct.

@@MickeyMousePlushShow1928 No shit

@@MickeyMousePlushShow1928 They’re Talking about the animatronic obviously.

​@@MickeyMousePlushShow1928 WTF man

@@ItCantRainAllTheTime1988 OOOOHHH Well the animated part is still better

Awesome job great work!!!

It’s awesome you can do this with the tech these days, anyone can try this, if they have the drive to learn!!

Yeeeeah your version sucks. Can't win every fight.

I think finding an animator or maybe even an animator who can also do rigging would be super useful to help you guys out :) seeing as you are doing more and more full cg stuff with cg characters

i love your work and totally understood the fun bit, and honestly the motioncap looks funny but there are a few specific areas where you can tell its human bones on a trex costume, which could've been its own video. (cgi barney) if this rexxy boy was to be a bit more realistic, I think the feet, ankle and knee joints would need to be reworked entirely. he lifts his foot like a dude and stuff. good work nonetheless, the scene looks dope af

he's holding in a big dump

Its a she, tho

yeah honestly the T rex model itself is pretty close to the original movie, I just wish there was some the animators Either new that dinosaurs couldn't and didn't stand that way or had a way to make the posture fully horizontal.

@@KingofTheGojiras it was a time constraint thing. They treated this as a one night challenge, but if they spent another week on animation then they could have nailed it.

@@victor1w irrelevant

its not CGI lol

@busTedOaS The t-rex wasn't, it was a model (so was the triceratops), but the velociraptors and a few others were CGI. And I meant this CGI made even that ancient CGI look good 🤣 Also, a few shots of the t-rex in the original were CGI. But not all.

Yes it is ​@@busTedOaS

Mind blown too

Just realized thats actually a Ford explorer

same

I'm honestly floored at this realization.

Likewise. At that point the Trex is real so *of course* the vehicle is real.

Probably because of the animatronic they used for the film. Weighed tons just like a real t-rex and was soaked so it weighed even more. Easy muddy footprint shots

@@thatonestranger6992 yea i was watching video on it and the task to make that work was ridiculous

yeah, that's what top-stop-motion-animatiors could do

@fire edi Not everything from that scene was cgi. When the rex crashed down on the car's glass, that was an accident made by the rex animatronic. And I believe that car was a real one in that scene, Jurassic Park is a very heavy mixture of cgi and animatronics, that's part of what makes it such a good movie.

@fire edi I know that, but the scene with the rex crashing into the glass and the kids holding it up wasn't cgi. The animatronic naturally wasn't supposed to get wet but they decided to keep filming as it rained, this made the animatronic a hell of a lot heavier and basically made it fall into the glass.

Am I wrong to think there's something a bit off about the rain splashing on the floor? I think it feels like it isn't impacted by the light as much as it should 🤔

same here, during covid shut down my local theatre was playing tons of old reels and this was one of them it was a privilege to be there.

@@dab56 I saw it in 93. It was the first digital movie to be released here in Australia. The sound was amazing.

I didn’t see it in theater in 93 because I was 5 and my parents were Uber religious at the time. When it hit imax 3D many years ago I went the day of. Best film experience of my life. Incredible film on the big screen.

Mine, too. I was a 7yr old in 1993 when it was released, and massively obsessed with Dinosaurs. Even at that age, I remember being very sceptical, and concerned, about how the dinosaurs would look, because there was no precedent for anything so lifelike at the time, Took my seat in the cinema, and was waiting for some Jim Henson style dinosaurs, but that first sighting of the brachiosaurus blew my mind, literally jaw to the floor! Their was audible gasps all over the cinema. Even the Triceratops & Dilophosaurus blew my my mind. Trex was up next, I just kept praying they wouldn’t f it up, man, it looked perfect! Nothing had ever been seen like that in movies before, and it still holds up. It still remains my greatest ever experience in a cinema, by a mile.

Same. I begged my parents to let me see it in the theater. I was 9. It is still one of the best movie experiences I’ve had.

Exactly...an elephant is one of the largest living animals and look how it moves, it has weight...of course a t.rex which has even more weight is also gonna move in a way that shows its massive weight, and the 1992 animators captured that perfectly. Not only are these amateurs bad, but even modern Jurassic World movie CGI by modern pros fails to properly take this into account, and the big dinos move around like they weigh nothing. It takes away from the realism...they think just because it looks more detailed it looks more realistic....wrong.

@@BigSplenda1885 I do really enjoy the new JW films, but I definitely agree with you--the animals aren't as realistic as they could be because they aren't taking into account the weight, movement restrictions, and how they would actually interact with their environment. I am really glad they brought back more animatronics in the newest film, though, and I am so excited to see the OC again!

I majored in Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue from 1998-2002. We made EVERYTHING ourselves. Has Computer Graphics turned into programming where everyone just gets existing code online and tweak things a little instead of really knowing what they are doing?

@@wjsmithiii YES, it has turned into that apparently. Sad really...it's a symptom of our lazy instant gratification culture. What these UKposts guys have "done" is absolutely pathetic, but I guess since everybody gets a participating trophy now they had no shame in posting this garbage anyway

@031 Exuberant Witness You've really proven the point we've all made here, though. The current CGI is not co-existing with both the realistic effects and science. I can't stand the unrealistic portrayal of human beings in current films--flipping and spinning like they're made of rubber and never actually getting hurt beyond a small cut on their cheek, put in completely unrealistic situations where a real human would die (jumping out of planes with no gear and no goggles, jumping out windows or tall buildings with the superhero landing, and the like). If you're a superhero, fine, but about half the superheroes nowadays aren't mutants/don't have special powers and are just regular human beings. There used to be a time when FX actually made you feel the characters were really in danger, that the stakes were real. But it just doesn't happen anymore.

totally agree

It looks good but it walks a bit toooo upright imho

It had that old school Ray Haryhausen stutter of stop frame animation of a rubber or plasticine model, and the feet still didn't interact with the floor properly which was ok until it stepped out from behind the car.

Stiff

@@Brandfall609 Yeah they most likely actually walked completely horizontial with their body and used their front arms for holding against the ground when bending forward

And it was done with a sprinkler on the original

Yea

You think $254 is a low budget? You could have 25 hamburgers for that.

@@EricSiegelPredicts compared to a Blockbuster film that is a miniscule budget

@@devzy793 I was joking.

...because it was real

Because George Lucas and his ilm team put in so much money and passion into cgi

I feel like the VFX one was made to be more aesthetically pleasing and pretty where the original was meant to be dark, rough and scary.

Because it was a mixture of animatronic and CGI technology..

Animatronic, the t rex is real

And the kids were shot separately and comped in.

I didn’t notice it until I looked to the tires. They’re not good looking 😂

@@MrSolidBlakeGaming they are completely fine, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

yes lol

Yes!

Yeah, but the mocap suit was just laying around... great they made a 5 minute fuss about buying a $250 model.... fake shit!

​@@Pempel2000 You mean every VFX hobbyist doesn't have a $10k+ worth of xsens mocap suit and software just lying around? 🤣

Couldn’t said it better myself

Nice..

23: 26 - A pretty dang good render. > No subdivision / micropoly displacement at rendertime, I can see the polygons near the leg at 23:36 > Overall animation is garbage, no sense of scale or weight - something the original JP nailed (look at the shot where the Trex hits the branch when chasing the jeep - legendary animation). > Lighting and shading is nailed, however, which is the problem with ALL VFX movies today. They only focus on the textures, models, and effects, not the animation. > No motion blur. Try again?

Condors!

@@nationalistfanatic6291 dude of course they didn't focused on animation, they had a guy in a suit acting like a t-rex. I think they did a good job for the amount of time they put into it, and i don't think the animation is meant to be taken seriously

That's because this channel usually is.

After their "better" Luke Skywalker deepfake video, I thought this one would be like that.

This was fucking awful lmao

i wanted to say something similar. glad someone said it better than i would have haha.

I think it would be more like mud though, not just water x) but yeah, that also helps sell the weight of the trex

@@feenux09 it would just be water. If you ever see water logged ground I suggest you try walking on it. It is very common in humid areas, and it is a pretty weird feeling to walk on it.

@@zachswain2196 it depends on the soil, though. Lose top soil or a lot of sand content would allow water to splash up, whereas loam would rather squeeze out from under the foot like wet mud without much splash. I think the original shot was in between the possibility and doesnt make much sense, it was basically a compacted dirt road that should just have water standing or running on it or a lot of mud depending on how long it was rained on.

@@feenux09 think of the mud like a piece of cloth, if you put pressure on it water will squeeze out and since the t-rex is so heavy a lot more water would come out.

These guys are professional? Whoever is paying them for their work should be getting refunds lol. This looks so bad

@@BoxxyFan Exactly this and their Luke Skywalker Mando redo look atrocious! They're like high fiving each other for crappy work.

@@BoxxyFan Did you not watch the end of the video? they said "we werent trying to make a better VFX or something in less time, it was to celebrate the artistic skill that went into making Jurassic Park movie so much more went into those sequences and pressing buttons on a computer" and mind you that the produces of JP spent 63 Million USD, whilst these guys spent $254 for 1 model, they didnt spent months making an entire robot skeleton of a T-Rex

At least they were redeeming Luke's pathetic episode 8 death. What is this being compared to?

"These guys are professional", imagine being that cognitively impaired. The guys at Corridor Crew are genuinely among the worst artists in the industry. An average mongoloid child with less than 1 hour of experience with CGI, would seem professional compared to these guys.

I was expecting them to say it for sure

What a missed opportunity.

These changes you did shows me that only professions will notice subtle faults. Most movie goers will enjoys the movies with no issues

hahahahaha :D

Ahah now they need to redo this with a static Toy Story's rex, moved as if it was a hand moving it like a kid.

😂🤣😂

@Laura Brown Perish, bot.

Bro they didnt even think of making it more realistic to the dinosaur.

They don't have the budget what do you expect lol

Watch Prehistoric Planet bro, best dinossaur CGI ever

@@youruncle7204 there is a difference with a movie with a budget of millions and a 350+ dollar model

@@raph4852 Neither did they have the tools these guys have in 1992....

Indeed, it was far worse than the stop-motion terminator at the end of T1. Pretty awful to be honest, as far as motion is concerned.

It does look like Ray Harryhausen stop-motion. I think it looks like a real object that's really in front of a camera - but it looks like a real *puppet*, not a real animal.

Obviously it’s not great but it’s still really good compared to anything else you’d see on YT.

As an animator and an avid dinosaur enthusiast, one of the things that breaks it for me is the way the t-rex moves, it's too stiff, the motion itself is rigid and shaky, dinosaur tails don't bend upwards like that, and the walk cycle isn't correct. They did try their best though for the budget concerned.

Crazy how you tubers who've been vfxing for years in 2022 can't beat guys using cgi in the 90s. The technology gap alone should've made them come out on top. They must not care about improving their craft.

Oh hey, it's Scott Hartman himself!

Also, the contact points of the t.rex with the floor are not right. Its feet look like they're sliding because they're not displacing correctly.

Most genius explanation on the internet

Most importantly. .The animation was done by actual stop motion animators via an armature. These guys were experts in making small stop motion models look like they were 100x the size by understanding the properties of scale, mass, and moving weight.

Yeah, I made a similar comment about dinosaurs being animals that walk on their toes instead of the sole of the foot. I think having Clint walk on a plank or beam that is a few inches high might have kept him far enough off the ground to simulate a T. Rex leg. Maybe it would have avoided the problem of the CGI T. Rex putting his foot through the ground.

it's one of the most intense moments in movie history.

Right? I was 9 and I saw it in theaters about half a dozen times. My cousin fainted from that t Rex scene and left the theater crying. Bonkers

Jurassic world and fallen kingdom and dominion all have much better cgi and so do countless other movies that have been released since then. You're straight up lying.

@@metoo3342 They certainly have more CGI, but I'd certainly not consider it "better." JW and Fallen Kingdom look like video games, IMO.

I was prepared to make essentially this exact comment - having experienced the JP theatrical release as a youngster, I’m not sure that experience has ever been recreated again. That’s perhaps entirely subjective, but I think it is also a fair argument that, even by today’s standards, the VFX in JP is among the absolute best and most impactful ever crafted.

yup, thats why a bad craftsman aways blames his tools its one thing to not have technology available to you, but its aways possible to do amazing work when your workspace is limited

I thought that recently new evidence has come out questioning the traditional depictions of dinosaurs and other ancient animals. I remember seeing videos suggesting that they may have actually had feathers, for example. Is that not true?

@@orchdork775 That is true. Put simply, "accurate Dinosaurs" do not exist. There's a LOT we don't know about a lot of them and there's a lot we probably never will due to how scenario specific good preservation is, it's quite rare. That's where speculation comes in, a good part of reconstructing Dinosaurs comes with speculation based on what we know about animals in general, and what would make sense. For instance you have the T. rex, there is absolutely no evidence for feathers on any member of Tyrannosauridae, but you may have still seen some art depicting it with feathers, that's because some Tyrannosauroids like Yutyrannus have been discovered with feathers, so that's speculation right there. But which one is the correct depiction then? Feathered or scaley T. rex? The answer is that we don't know, recent evidence does point towards a T. rex with scales as we have found scale specimens, but those are tiny, there could still be some feather covering on the back or neck. We just don't know, that's the problem with reconstructing Dinosaurs, there's a lot we don't know, that is why speculation is so prevalent. But just because we can speculate doesn't automatically make that depiction correct, it might very well be very wrong. There's no way to be sure that we got the depiction of something right when we know so little about it and our knowledge about it is destined to change.

Walking with Dinosaurs was pure art! Seriously, Impossible Pictures’ work is fantastic

I would love to see it (or Jurassic Park) re-done with feathers

@@asaxena9921 Very well put. It's kinda frustrating to see people have such strong opinions on dinosaurs and their appearances, especially with how little we actually know about them, all things considered. It's fun to speculate and it interests me to no end to imagine these creatures in different scenarios but there's no real reason to argue about it. (On a side note - I really hope snow camouflaged T-Rexs with white fuzz existed, because that sounds extremely cool and adorable XD)

That might explain why I found the older movies a bit better than recent ones.

@@mikoto7693 I think that's largely down to the Jurassic World movies being fucking atrocious.

I mean this is pretty much common knowledge for the past decade

One video like this doesn't prove anything, it just confirms your bias. imagine something like infinity war (Idk whether you like it or not) with just practical effects and 90's cgi, it would look horrible. Modern cgi reliant special effects and practical effects both have their place.

@@Blisterdude123 the movies look fine its just nostalgia

Tail was used for balancing on t-rex so maybe add a weighted tail... Although the long feet might also been used for balancing. Tracking a position extending to where the feet point to might also help although i do not have any experience in moddeling I assume balancing in this model is a lot of artists impression.

There's nearly a feeling of weight, however the lack of motion in the t-rex model's arms and feet offsets this. The arms make it look like a fixed model. The feet look like it has club feet and the lack of motion, i.e. spreading of weight and toes detracted from the feeling of weight. None of this means that it's not a damn good scene generated in such an incredibly short period of time.

@@nickryan3417 oh I don't want you think I think it looks bad, it looks good, and even they are aware of where they could improve upon. I just suggested the weights to help simulate the heavy step so it's one less thing they have to worry about. If they had the suits from Walking with Dinosaurs that has a remote for the tail I think it would help with that, too. Seeing those suits when I was a kid was super cool, but the R/C puppets for the big ones were what stuck with me.

@@nickryan3417 true also great that they used most of the budget on buying a t-rex model

Bro, so much genius behind this

Yeah, think you hit the nail on the head.

^ This.

True

Nope, the newer film act more like an animal, and doesn’t act blood thirsty monster like the old film.

What do you mean?

@@redskull378 Phil Tippet and his stop motion team at ILM were originally contracted to do the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park. The new CGI division felt they could do a more realistic version and animated a really quick TRex walking. That sold Spielberg, but they felt bad about Tippet. Tippet’s team was kept on and they actually created the Dino Input Device, where the stop motion puppeteers could move and armature and the computer would pick up that movement. It was and still is a perfect blend of all meets new.

@Jake Folk True.

Don’t forget Stan Winston studios

He had one job though and yet there were dinosaurs all up in the kitchen. Like, goddammit, Phil.. People died..

yeah that was the bit that ruined the whole thing for me, it looked really weird and unnatural as a t-tex wouldn't be able to get imto that position.

@@Vorador47 T-Rex: Become "V"

JP had the benefit of having a paleontologist on staff. (Even though they didn't always listen to him--feathers)

it got hit in the back with a truck

have u guys noticed that the rex has no claws in the scene.... :(

Chocolate raiiiinnn

Intense piano plays*

So cool

haha what are you doing here? howdy

and we are live!

Around 7 metric tonnes to be exact, which is roughly 4.6 times heavier than the Jeep in the scene. That’s a big boi, and all that weight concentrated on around 2.5m^2. This works out at 27,500Pa of force, give or take. Absolutely enough force to squeeze water out of mud

In movie, the scene is so fast going that you never get to details. And thats the whole point of effects, they dont have to be super accurate because the detail is only a small portion of the whole which you dont even see. So pointless to use time to make everything 100% realistic.

small things like 'weight', 'shadows', etc. helps sell a CG model so well when it visually is noticable :3

@@glassplanet5624 Average T-Rex would be about 7 tons indeed. But the T-Rex from Jurassic park was modeled on the biggest one ever found, at about 9 tons.

@@basmca1 So even more true.

"Derp the Dinosaur"

the fact the claws dont hang as the ankle is lifted is a dead giveaway too. look at literally every foot movement on the movies and how they treated the chain of strength from the hip all the way to the toes and you'll recognize the pattern instantly

Interesting what people pick up on. The thing I noticed the most was how his little arms were almost frozen in place. Barely moved at all.

@@chaos_omega walked way too erect too

The individual toes on the Trex is the most obvious one for me.. In the Original you could see the Trex grip the ground and clench its feet while here the feet where like frozen blocks

Give this man more likes so Corridor can see.

I agree. it was just the dino passing by the frame. that could be animated in like 3/4 days and it would've look far superior.

Dude, are you sure you have 14 years experience in the industry? I'm only asking as you think you can get 1-2 days of an animator for $250 ..

@@callum.jupp. that's 30/hour for a day work, which is pretty typical mid-level animator pay. Jr level animators (mostly outside of California) can be paid as low as 15-20/hour, as well as college interns. Any of those options would still do better than the motion capture dino. I was offering for free because it would just be fun for me and something like this would only take a few hours assuming the rig wasn't total trash.

I'm curious which Triple A games you worked for? I always wonder how being an animator is and how hard is it as a job. Also was interested in that kind of stuff.

The rigid arms are very distracting.

I think those two points are the main issue. The arm mocap was probably not usable at all so they gave up on the arms altogether. But considering the timerestraints they had to work with what they had.

I think Clint tried to replicate the toe walking but it got lost in the process. The greatest flaw I see is the hips, they are too stiff. There need to be quite some wiggle from side to side in order to convey the 6 tons walking on two legs. And from there, the two counterweights tail and head would have to swing in sync to sell it.

sorry no. so much is wrong. they have neck at the bottom the skull which is wrong T-rex had head like bird with the neck at back not base of the skull back hips and tail all should be in line parallel to the ground and in line with jaw. hips need to center over knees ankes and toes.. which another issues others pointed out like birds they lead there walk with there toes again look at emu or chickens. needs to be WAY more mass in the chest t-rex here looks like it its starving to death

The anatomy of an animal's hind leg versus the anatomy of a human leg is definitely a problem. I don't mind the motionless forelimbs, though. They shouldn't move. They're vestigial and useless. Treat them like the tiny arms of the queen in "Aliens": they don't move unless someone shows up with a flamethrower!

Someone is going to run into a T rex in Son of a Dungeon someday

@@flywan 😂😂😂😂

The biggest problem with Corridor's version isn't modern VFX, the problem is that they used mocap instead of hand animating the T-rex model, let a lone have any reference on how they walk. Also are you implying that Jurassic Park only used practical effects?

Note the original looks so much better that modern scene looks like shit sorry to say they butchered it so much if that’s what modern day cgi looks like wow great job the 90s crew back in the day

thank you so much I’ve been skipping around trying to find it

Everything in the scene complements the Rex. The Jeeps, the broken fence, high foliage behind her. It's a scene that likely went through tons of rewrites to present in the perfect manner, literally from writing the script and story-board concepting. These guys tried to pull off a similar effect with a near non-existant budget and a day's worth of planning(?).

@@demonicpokeyfruit9006 budget yes they probably don’t have the money for proper software and tools but neither did the editors back in the 90s hell we have better tech today so give those guys some credit movies like 30 years old still looks god dam fantastic

Oof yeah comparing the two the original played off WAY more realistic

Really good points

We were shooting at F16. Like we literally could not stop down any further and we had the spotlights at max. The grease is a great idea though! If we had more time we would've weathered the jeeps too.

@@SirWrender Interesting. I'll have to give it a try myself sometime. Maybe the car was just too small for even that setting. But the things you set out to prove definitely worked.

spot on advice

Should've spent more big bucks on some nice 3d jeep models and used the miniatures for reference imho

Wtf is a beredict?

I always correct the record on this when I can: the animation of Jurassic park was done BY stop motion animators via an armature. Instead of wasting the talents of the stop motion team after CGI was dreamed the better choice, they utilized their decades of experience in animating creatures to look massive.

It's because they studied real animals, from elephants to rhinos.

@@BOBBYT5751 Beredict Arnhold

Yeah its tail sticking up like a scared cat and its...bizarre posture killed me.

It definitely was weird

this is what i think these guys don't understand, is the reason why jurassic park was so good is because it was animators that were in charge, not computer guys during jurassic park.. thats why the animation was so good.. it was stop motion animators in charge.

hahah I just watched yours. It's like Wallace and Gromit! It's freaking claymotion, man. Whatever parts you were missing from the full-studio work, those parts were important.

Also, the sole story of the film was survival. You didnt know if the cast could survive. While today you simply assume. Just watched dominion and every person eaten was an extra. Often on screen for less than a minute. So you had no emotional ties or development. No reason to really experience the fear the original film brought out in viewers. The original actually made you feel something.

Now how do we get studios to see this perspective? Its like shouting into the void out here.

@@dani3670 No amount of shouting will be louder than the noise Hollywood execs experience from cocaine and hookers.

@@treatb09 What are you even talking about???? Pretty much every single person who died in the orginals either was very predictable, was an asshole or was undeveloped and literally no one cared (you might argue 1 character but I'll argue he was predictable later). The main cast pretty much never dies, the children never die, it's very predictable and I love the series. To be thorough in my argument here is all 3 films: JP1: 3 Scientists and 2 grandkids all live, only member of the jeep group who dies was the asshole lawyer who abandons the kids, predictable. JP2: Malcolm lives, his ex lives, his daughter lives and the photographer/activist lives. Now this is where someone might argue what about Eddie? Eddie wasn't super developed, and both of his major dialogues were major death flags, first he talks about how deadly the toxin he brought to tranq dinos is to humans (a gun he struggles to use before he dies) and then how he was going to be the lookout and set up a canopy, which both physically and metaphorically distances himself from the main group of characters. First dialogue is about death, 2nd is him distancing himself from the other characters, super predictable, nice guy, but predictable. JP3: The parents live, the 2 scientists live, the kid lives, only people who die are pilots/bodyguards types who no one gave a shit about, also the off screen death of the mother's boyfriend who took the kid parasailing, predictable survivors and deaths.

This is why I agree with famous directors who made headlines in recent years attacking the way that “Film” is dead as the only money in it goes to marvel comic book movies entirely fake looking CGI. There are no real explosions. No actual stunts that put real people in serious danger. And the story lines are generally garbage because of woke Hollywood afraid if it’s shadow. Thankfully, a movie library of 80 years of great film exists. Enough to keep a person entertained.

Exactly! Lol

*parties ;)

Best comment ever

LMAO

To this day it’s still my favorite film of all time .

we could easily make something better in this time and age, these guys didnt have the budget nor time to make anything better, their rendition was kinda lame too so u cant use them as a reference to where we are at now compared to back in 1993

i remember after i watched the Jurassic World.... i was like "dude, the cg looks corny on this compared to the first Jurassic park movie" that movie felt so real it scared me when i was a kid. that, i didnt felt on jurassic world.

Yes, the arms really bother me. I think it's because I've been watching the channel for so long, I've been taught to see the subtle things. It's still incredible what they have done

@@danielbrazier8095 for me it was 'It registers as wrong. Why does it register as wrong?' and then you notice a whole bunch of details

@@bWWd0 it was done in a day

They didn't have phones to distract them back then

@@MetaITurtle I honestly cannot tell if you are being sincere

LMFAO