Yo I watched the show and this video is so good, fantastic job GreenDotAviation!

The fact that the aircraft was 9M-MRO and it’s made in 2002

Who asked for the pilots' oxygen cylinders to be refilled? Who knew that the software did not indicate the position transmitted by the aircraft, but an extrapolated position? This guy had 18,000 flying hours! Why would he do this? I've watched the video several times this week. Incredible work!

@@SouthernAvia I don't get it. Why is this important?

@@dolandump ik but the plane crash was a mass murder suicide plot

Agreed, it's not about content standard anymore for high flying(accidental pun) executive producers and well established TV companies, it's only about the money where service and even truth sometimes are irrelevant to them. This channel clearly has a sense of accuracy with the detailed investigative nature and isn't financially or narratively driven in my opinion.

this is better than that 'show' on netflix right?

Agreed, but it also shows how dedicated the former is as well

Yeah that “documentary” totally wasn’t biased at all

TV producers have to create content that appeals to a broad audience, including those who may not have any interest in aviation or are not familiar with the MH370 case. This channel's style is more focused on niche aviation audiences, allowing for a more detailed and granular analysis compared to what might be found on TV or Netflix.

wow that's like so deep man

My dad was hospitalized in Jakarta 10 years ago, I was still 10 and woke up at 7AM as I had to visit my dad that morning. I watched the news that a Malaysian Airline flight was declared missing. 10 years later I find out that the plane was probably still flying when I watched the news. I'll never forget that day

So is the 777 ​@@T.E.S.S.

10 years later and these poor families still have no answers for what happened to their loved ones. I can't even imagine....

I flew from kuala lampur to Incheon Korea (almost the exact same flight path) on that exact day 10 years later. It felt quite eerie.

well we dont know if thats true. So they could have all died together at the same time. or... are still alive.

@@rickjames5998 im aware but the possibility of that being the case is still haunting also i think the likelihood that they hadnt crashed into the ocean is non existent lol since they found some of the parts theyre def all dead

​@@rickjames5998the passengers are dead before it crash to the ocean, watch Mentour Pilot documentary

​@@rickjames5998It is true, stop being like Netflix

This is absolutely horrifying. He did everything that he could've, rest in peace

Ahhh this is speculation

​@Skabanis it is speculation, but what isn't speculation is that something horrifying did happen to him

bruh why are people so easy to believe this made up scenario, for all we know he couldve been the hijacker.

@@bebekdragon7604 Cause with your logic it might as well be green people from Mars. Fact remains this scenario is by FAR most plausible. In contrast to any unlikely hijacker captain was in actual position to do so without much effort. DUH, Flight 9525 which happened few years later showcases how easily such thing could happen with unhinged pilot. Hijacker theory completely ignores how tougher getting into cockpit is in post 9/11 world. It also utterly ignores perfect timing when plane went AWOL. How the hell hijacker would know to take control at this specific moment? Hijacker theory plain and simply doesn't work for way too many factors.

If that were true then yeah.. however, it’s just another theory, there’s no proof he did it.. a majority of the things this UKpostsr says that point to the pilot doing it are just made up. Like the pilot telling the FO to get him coffee and the FO trying to open the cockpit door, where the hell is the evidence for this? This UKpostsr is taking everyone here for a ride, acting like he seen what went on inside the plane lol. This is nothing more than a bedtime story. I will give him this this tho, makes good for creative writing.

@@famo7503fr i watched all the video thinking there were new proof released and everything, or he would show a font but bro, he made almost everything up and it’s just another theory, like…

That horrific Helios “ghost flight” where everyone was unconscious but one flight attendant, and fighter jets trying to escort it could see him struggling in the cockpit through the windows really messed me up. He was a hero - he was no pilot, but alone and knowing he couldn’t land the plane, that it was going to inevitably crash, the plane away from crashing into the Athens area and it crashed in a field.

@@famo7503so, id love to know how it ended up over the Pacific Ocean, in your opinion then. What sort of “error” makes a plane turn 180 degrees, skirt all along the national air territories, and then fly away from any land mass. Let’s hear it, genius. Give me occams razor…. All this without even mentioning that they found the EXACT PATH on zaharie’s flight simulator. So much “coincidence”, huh

The coffee idea is a theory based on fact though. The chance it wasn't a murder suicide is just so microscopic. The pilot flew the flight in a simulator prepping for it, he filled the oxygen tank that same day, he did the flyby of his hometown. All of the evidence points towards it being a murder suicide. ​@@famo7503

It is very very well done. I think a lot of us are sick and tired of the redherrings and strawman arguments, conspiracy theories etc. As this video shows literally everything that occurred is completely consistent with pilot intentionally killing everyone. Everything we know about the flight path, and technical aspects points to this conclusion and all other alternate theories have some major problems that are just ignored when people proffer those alternate theories. The fact that none of us *want* it to be a mass murder by the pilot doesn't change the fact that this is what it was. Netflix ought to be ashamed or its shoddy and pandering "documentary" and I am grateful for this extremely sober alternative

Sky News Australia did a documentary about a year ago, with the same basic theory and interviewing multiple experts.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/e5N6q6ppmYh1zJc.htmlsi=M7xf_WWElOjkCgN7

​@@av_oidyour grammar...also isn't sky News Australia a right wing news Network similar to that of fox news

​@@railfandepotproductions far better than a left wing nut case network like the MSM.

He didn't though.

@@purplestrawberrysunsethe did

How can those of us who watched this video verify either way if the captain had done what the video says he did ? Anybody out there know ???

@@arielporte4149essentially because every other theory about what happened to MH370 has serious flaws in them. This is the only theory that doesn’t have any flaws.

Well, considering we don’t know what happened.. what a sick world we live in.

@@moemonte88the plane hit water hard. Based of the debris, The captain is obviously at fault for this incident

@@molester4672 ok

Bad people are as old as humanity, not new

@@moemonte88we don’t know what happened but I bet you there are people high up in the Malaysian government who know exactly what happened.

People are scared of flying all the time and while we don’t really know the exact cause of this accident it still highlights how many backup systems there are on board to ensure everyone’s safety even when something goes terribly wrong. After all the aviation transportation is the safest way of transportation out there and it is constantly improving and improving leading to even less and less accidents. While I am not a real pilot I am a pilot who flies in a flight simulator at home using highly realistic and accurate aircraft models and even I can tell you that the redundancy of aircraft systems is just insane.

@@Nameisnotimportant True. I have X-Plane 12 and just disabling basic things is almost impossible

@@pablorubio8287 I fly in X-Plane 11 and I actually can confirm this. Unless you literally intentionally make a wing disappear by going to a failures menu it’s actually possible to safely land even with very screwed up airplane often times without even a lot of issues but that’s of course only if you know that airplane well and you have a proper knowledge and experience flying it.

@@Nameisnotimportant Hard to accidentally crash a plane. Shame some people don't realise it, right?

@@pablorubio8287 Yeah I mean…so many people are just scared of air travel especially when they hear about all of these accidents. And some of them are scared to an extent where if you were to pull out the numbers of how many people died around the world as a result of car crashes vs plane crashes in 2023 those people would still doubt the safety of air travel. Pilots nowadays are really well trained to deal with challenging emergency situations which most non aviation enthusiast people often can’t even imagine happening and as we both mentioned earlier the planes themselves are designed in such a way that they just simply don’t fall out of the sky that easily. And usually when an accident happens it’s not caused by like one single fault or one single human error. Usually it’s caused by many more things (for example multiple pilot errors combined with whole bunch of different factors that further worsen the situation). Whenever I travel as a passenger on board of a real aircraft I always fully trust all of the cabin crew members including pilots as I know that nowadays they have to be very well trained to be able to meet the necessary requirements. I understand that in 1970s or 1980s the safety standards were nowhere near where they were in 1990s and absolutely nowhere near to being even close to what they’re now. But we are in 2024 and not only the air travel is statistically the safest it’s ever been but it keeps constantly improving even further.

💜

So very sorry.

That’s sad. To not have any closure is hard when it’s a loved one,

He is at rest. What is buried in the ground is not where a loved one rests. The energy and spirit leaves the body and what's left behind is an empty shell, the vehicle in which we travel around when we are alive. When we pass on we can still be around those we love because our spirit lives on. I wish the mum could find peace in knowing that her loved one is with her, standing by her every day. The suffering of those who have passed does not continue each day like it does for family and friends left behind. There's no such thing as closure. we must allow ourselves to mourn the loss of a loved one each day as it comes upon them but it must be put into a box and set aside to mourn again the following day. It cannot be your whole life for the remainder of your life. It is a process and being able to set aside those sad feelings after allowing youreself to mourn for a period of time each day will help you to reach a point where you are living and your loved one would not want you to stop living. God bless the friends and relatives who lost someone on that flight.

​@@tbrockton356don't go to Euphrates River when gold gets up

I pay UKposts £10 pm, so I never see useless annoying adverts. 😅

Same here.

Same. It's the opposite side of Mentor Pilot's analysis. He gave the pure facts so it's clear what the evidence actually confirms. While this channel gives a story that's impossible to confirm, but helps us wrap our heads around a story that makes sense and offers closure.

The biggest difference that I saw was Mentour Pilot said there was some evidence (don't remember how strong it was) that the plane may have done some piloted figure 8's before crashing. That would indicate that who ever was flying the aircraft probably was alive all the way up til impact with the ocean.

i wish green dot aviation and mentour pilot had equal subscribers(green dot aviation only has over 300 K subs compared to mentour who was 2M🙄🙄

It was the WSPR track​@@Valpo2004

We don't know that this actually happened. This is strictly a hypothesis at this point.

its not unprecedented. It happened with the Helios flight. Everyone was unconscious except for a flight steward who donned an oxygen cylinder,

@westnblu Oh absolutely! And I'm not saying that it's not. This could be absolutely what happened! But if you read through the comments, there are a lot of people assuming this is exactly what happened and it's already been proven. There is still the possibility that this is not what happened at all. I guess what I'm saying is, you. We probably should always remain open-minded, if a theory hasn't been proven true without a shadow of a doubt. I agree this is by far though, the only explanation that makes sense.

@@jeffhudson9130 cant wait for other explanatory theory that makes sense

@@LAHKACAUAWK I'm hoping for concrete proof and then the official story lol

They found nothing it is said in comments.

​@@EMEL-hr4ut Not true. He and his wife were in the middle of a separation and he was connected to a Malaysian politician who was recently disgraced (or part of a smear campaign by the ruling party, depending on the source.)

​@@EMEL-hr4utThat video of him simulating a plane crash is enough.

@kevinc.1729 those same matters taken by you as 'fact' could be motive to act for money and he didn't kill himself and the alleged trajectory in this video is wrong. This video conspicuously does not mention who or what was on board or deal with the striking coincidence of events with the Ukraine Malaysian Air crash

@mountainrock7682 who found this 'evidence' and analysed it ? You presume he left such evidence behind although the whole basis of this video was thst his motive was to dissappear without trace.

Hey now, explosive fruit is a VERY likely culprit. 😅

Crazy eh? We all first were alerted this plane was missing and they were searching, meanwhile she was still flying as a ghost plane south of the search!! Creepy

😮😮😮

Stop traveling deep into the Indian Ocean, homie.

I guess military aircraft go out there all the time. But for 777 to do it....

Diego Garcia.

@@curtisjeffries-ki2dolol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@yasminbarry7941gooooooood point . Very interesting

Yes...amazing...

It's amazing how many people will claim their preferred narrative as "the only real theory" without any actual hard evidence to back it up.

Some comments here will blow your mind by how uninformed, but creative they are.

What about the policy. There have to be 2 staff members in the cockpit at all times. When in flight ???

@@dlynn4188great question. Many airlines have that policy. Did MH have that policy at that time? I don’t know. Some airlines do not. German wings didn’t have it when the FO locked the CA out of the flight deck and crashed the plane into the mountains in continental Europe. That would require further investigation.

@@samadiddle i'm pretty sure that a female flight attendant wouldn't be a problem to handle for an average male, he could've just KOd her.. btw, m370 disappeared in 2014, germanwings incident happened in 2015.. i always thought that the policy was introduced in 2015 for the first time ever.. hmm

A​@@jwst8 Without doubt its a fantastic documentary. But without the FDR how has the maker managed to get a lot of the data out with respect to what pilot did in the cockpit??

I get that you wouldn't want the assume the worst of a fellow pilot, but they did literally find his premeditated mass murder route on his flight simulator in his home...

Thank you!

This and LEMMINO

@@Repent-and-believe-in-Jesus Bro whattttt

​@@DeepLakeRCtbh lemminos vid seems void of information compared to this.

Apologies to those who were fascinated with this video. This is one of the most baseless doc on MH370 ever produced. Blurring the boundary between facts and fiction. How in the world, this guy knows the specific details of what the Captain told his first captain when the plane's black box has never been found. Sweater and coffee, making holes in the plane, utter nonsense!!

I'm glad!

​@@GreenDotAviationout of pure curiosity, may I ask how did they recover the (erased) flight simulation data from the home computer? Great video, it woke me up from my sleepiness from start to end! Other comments recommended your channel, I'm glad I checked.

@@mariabeatrizlopezperalta5681 the same confusing question with me

@@journeyforyou5600 To a good hacker or let's say IT specialist, nothing is forever deleted. And most data can be found again.

​@@mariabeatrizlopezperalta5681 @journeyforyou5600 ​ When you delete something off a hard-drive, you're not actually deleting it. You are just telling the controller of the hard-drive that the place where the data was stored is now to be considered free space. You have to fill that free space with new files for the data to be actually erased.

Intriguing possibility there

Yeah, no harm being thorough.

There was 2 sets of crews on the flight MH150 that day it left for Jeddah not Beijing, Zahari purchased his internal hardrive on Dec 21st, 2023 and had this simiulation deleted on February 2nd, 2024 a couple weeks before the flight to Jeddah, Zahari and his First Officer only flew half way to Jeddah and half way back, they were experienced pilots on both sectors of this flight who would not have left the cockpit, MH370 First Officer may have in all probality left the cabin and tried to use his cell phone to alert ATC that he was locked out of the cabin during this madness by Capt Zahari before the plane was pressurized killing all occupants on board.

@@TheeMcMas interesting

Empathy has clouded her judgement

Gacy was considered a nice guy. Nobody knows anybody...... evidence.

these days, that is how all science works. They start with the conclusion they want, and then look for whatever evidence would support that and ignore any that undermines it. And if they can't find any, they create it.

I haven't seen the Netflix documentary, but I believe this. Netflix and most TV is directed towards the general public, on youtube you find more detailed and more technical documentaries, they're directed for maybe a more technical crowd. I used to watch the "Mayday" TV series, and almost all crash documentaries I've seen on youtube far surpass the TV series in regards to technical details, what went wrong, etc. Even if maybe they are a bit on the too low side of budget, they're still good, while "Mayday" had dramatic reenactments, you could see the passengers panicking, stepping on one another or punching the kid next to them or their wives, to steal their oxygen mask etc. It was interesting, although I prefer the low budget youtube MSFS reenactments - less drama.

I’m not disagreeing with you but if the captain did hijack the aircraft (which I think he did), what was his motive then? Why would someone with a distinguished flying career throw it all away? But that netflix documentary was a bunch of bs. The only good thing that came from it was it had interviews of the victims’ families and shared their stories/perspectives.

Yes, so true and I wonder if the captain ever had a moment of regret after there was no going back?

interesting fact, the germanwings crash where the pilot got locked out happened just 1 year earlier. maybe zaharia got his inspiration from there.

you have no idea, i was in a free fall 2 years ago and its changed my life... being so close to death the way i experianced ripped everyhting i thought life was about out and chnaged me forever... we free fell for 10 mins... those 10 mins will last me my lifetime.... it was like a rollercoaster feeling but 50 million times stronger along with ever negative emotion you could imagine .... nerves on fire, crying and choking on your own tears... suddenly the stranger next to you becomes your family

There may have been one or two things the 1st Officer could have done in this scenario. There were multiple portable oxygen systems in the passenger compartment, so he may have been able to get them set up and play possum (give the impression he had died) and look for an opportunity. Anther thing he could have done was open 1 ore more emergency exit doors. That would not have changed his outcome, but it would have put a big monkey-wrench in the captain's plans and caused the plane to end up in an easier place to locate.

It is just a theory...nobody knows what actually has happened

They may be alive because there was some lucky charm with them that night .

Damn…

His other videos were not 75% speculation.

@@tarnvedra9952they never even found the wreckage of this plane and we have no idea what happened after the first deviation from the planned route, we really can’t do anything but speculate after that. I lived in Malaysia until the search operation was called off and the general assumption was that all things considered the captain deliberately crashed the plane - we just can never know for sure

@@vegasoverheaven but this "theory" i wouldnt even call it theory, everthing he listed up in this video makes sense, and everything gives hints that the captain did it, a really big hint would be who gave the maintance guy the task to Fill the Cockpit oxygen bottle up on THE SAME DAY, why did nobody ask this guy this big question, there are so many questions left open .... edit: and He simulated this exact scenario in Flight Simulator, like how long he could glide from the point where he would ran out of fuel, i mean this is a dead giveaway that he is 100% responsible

​@@dominikdorn159Checking the crew oxygen bottle pressure would be part of the Daily Check carried out on the aircraft. The engineer responsible wouldn't need to be told by anyone to fill up the bottles. It's part of the check he's signing for.

@@stephenholland5930 Correct but as the video mentioned, The oxygen is topped up only a few times a year, not everyday. And the day the oxygen bottle was topped up is the exact day this incident occurred

How tragic. That really sucks. I'm so sorry for you and every single soul affected by this.

Sorry to hear.

@@weaverdreams You're apparently privy to some new conclusive information that none of the rest of us has seen, as you can unequivocally state exactly what happened even without being on the plane! What's the scoop?

Another victim to Muslim violence. God bless America and Israel.

I’m sorry for your loss.

Thank you! The people who really did all the hard work are mentioned in the video description. I hope at least one of the two proposes searches for this year goes ahead.

neckbeard utubers cant get shit done.

@@GreenDotAviation hope you reach 2M subscribers before July of this year

Except the ending is inaccurate. They found the back flap of the wing. The back of the that flap was damaged, as if it skidded across water. The pilot descended slowly in the water, trying to keep plane intact. That's why they barely found any debree. Thankfully that wing broke off. But yeah the ending here is wrong. If the plane crashed as he says, there would have been alot more found AND the wing they found wouldn't even exist

@@rich4ever223 the plane crash landed while gliding on autopilot and auxiliary power, the request for satellite connection around the time the fuel was supposed to run out confirms this theory. So speculation on how the boeing 777 touched the water is a bit too far fetched

Thanks so much for the detailed comment and feedback. I'm delighted that you got what I was aiming at in this video. The facts that you mentioned - the O2 tanks being filled up, the flight sim being deleted, and the radio waves showing a descent in the final minutes - all of this is evidence which has been well known to those who are familiar with the case for years, but not to the general public. I thought this was a shame, as it has lead to the proliferation of bizarre conspiracy theories (like the alien stuff which is currently having a moment online). If this video can go some way towards showing a broader range of the known facts to people, then it will have achieved its aim. As for AF447, that video will come in time! And it will be another big project. Edit: Some viewers are confused about which information presented in this scenario is speculation, and which is factual. UKposts tells me that the video description is too long, so I cannot add this clarification there. I will do so in this comment instead. Here is a list below: Speculation: - That the captain asked the FO to leave the cockpit - The behaviour of the FO - that he used a portable O2 bottle, used his phone, tried to gain entry into the cockpit. - That the plane was depressurised - That the external lights were turned off - That the SDU log-on at 02:25 MYT was a result of the captain powering up the L and R main electrical buses, and that this was done in order to stop the equipment bay from overheating. - That the captain was dead as the plane flew south over the Southern Indian Ocean - That the plane was not glided onto the surface of the ocean, but entered an uncontrolled spiral dive, leading to a high-speed impact with the water. Facts (see video description for sources): - For two data points (over a split second), the transponder of MH370 sent position information, but no altitude information. This indicates that somebody in the cockpit rotated the switch through the 'Alt off' position. - MH370 disappeared from secondary radar - Almost immediately after disappearing from secondary radar, the plane turned left, to head south west over the Malaysian peninsula (as seen on Primary radar) - The First Officer's cell phone connected with a cell tower on Penang at 01:52am MYT. It is still not known whether any passengers' phones connected to the cell tower, or even, whether this was investigated. - The plane made a turn at Penang, to head up the Strait of Malacca - The SDU powered back on at 02:25 MYT while the plane was flying up the strait of Malacca - The plane turned south over the Indian Ocean some time after 02:30 MYT - The Captain had simulated a flight into the Southern Indian Ocean on his home flight simulator on February 3rd that year, ending in fuel exhaustion. - The captain deleted his home flight simulator from his PC on Feb 20th, the day before he operated MH370 to Beijing. - The crew O2 tanks on 9M-MRO had been topped up to 1800psi in the hours before the flight. - INMARSAT engineers used the BTO data from the plane's SDU to determine the plane's distance to the satellite, creating 7 rings. They also used the BFO data to determine the plane's vertical speed in what were likely the flight's final moments. I will add to this list as more questions come.

This is infinitely superior than the Netflix documentary.

Mentour Pilot covered AF477 - the Titanic of the skies. You should check that out.

The main difference with AF447 is that the airplane and the flight recorders have been found and that there is a final report and no mystery. It has been very well covered by Mentour pilot indeed, based on the final report and his experience as an airline captain.

​@@GreenDotAviationit definitely achieved its aim , well done.

Airline need to have 3 pilots. If one go make coffee the other officer can still stay behind and check on the Captain. LOL!!!

How did this channel know that Zaharie after sending his co pilot to get coffee, reached behind him to get his sweater…?

@@JadeeCee-ty1heIt was a hypothesis that he said

@@simbatortie9684 this was only implemented after this accident

​@@GlutenEruption Not true before flying became more streamlined there used to be more people in cockpit like 3-4. They were flight eginners, not pilots but they could still help in emergencies.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Then you haven’t seen Mentour’s one yet my man

@@Eruma_27, already seen that one also. Actually that was seen before this one. Both are superb content.

USA mass shooters

Keep in mind that even if crew involvement is the correct theory. What happened inside the plane is pure mystery.

​@@mursie100not so much of a mystery if you re watch this video It's by far the most likely explanation of what happened to this flight -

If he wanted to end his life, why take all these poor innocent victims with you. That's a selfish cruel act 😢 RIP to all the souls on board ❤

​@@mursie100 The first officer's phone connected once to cell phone towers mid-flight and so on... It isn't a complete mystery, but we will never know for certain what truly was happening inside the flying metal bird...

This is something else, never seen, never heard, never tried. A sharp mind made us fly and a sharp mind made us crash. Humans are unbelievable.

But how does the investigators know what occurred on the plane in terms of the copilot being told to make coffee and then being locked out and putting in the code etc

@@darkhacker8747That’s exactly what I was going to ask.

@@darkhacker8747 Lol, There will always be more questions than answers. Look at glass half full.

@@darkhacker8747it’s not clear from the video but these are all just things that could have possibly happened. The only true facts are the few signals that were received from the plane and its presence on the military radars. Everything else is simple speculation

Thank you very much. So no information on other iPhones trying to connect to the cellular tower just like the FO's?

Hey, I remember the captains home flight data wasn’t actually clear and that the flight towards the indian ocean was recovered from corrupted files and it was unclear whether all the data points towards the indian ocean were in the same save file or not. This was a while ago that I remember this so I’m not sure if the findings changed and it’s confirmed now but I remember the investigation board not being able to 100% confirm there was a similar flight path. Is there any clarification on this? Thanks for your post btw very detailed and great!

Respectfully - aside from the moments where he explicitly states as much - one of average intelligence should be able to deduce what can be proven and can’t.

​@@lewishendo9328 yeah i need a source for this too. No reputable outlets are reporting this with confidence, it's all theories.

I was able to deduce correctly which bits were speculation, but I find it really helpful to have it listed in such detail, particularly for reference later. The list of facts is particularly compelling. Many thanks for your effort!

You clearly should have been the consultant on the netflix show.

Thank you for your added expert insight!

Wow airline pilots are also nearly electricians/electronics/software and system engineers and techs. I can see why. My respect to you all. I'm not worthy.

Excellent expert insight.

facts, they're experts in SOOOOo many realms. it's unreal.@@seanbittner7136

This is not a documentary, it is a docudrama.

Be careful, this is not a documentary, 90% of it is speculation, not fact. It presents speculation as being fact. All claims about what happened inside the plane is 100% fiction. Nobody knows what happened inside the plane.

Agreed

Same here! Intriguing

Me Too Great Work

Sad but true, the deeds of a Malaysian pilot. All given to them easy with a birthright of being a Malay.

What is the "birthright of being a Malay"?

@@liloleist5133Malaysia is a country that is extremely multiracial with chinese, indian, indigenous tribes and way more diversity. But since there are so many foreign ethnic groups not native to Malaysia, the malays who are actually native to Malaysia and have their ethnicity in the country name are highly important in Malaysia. Most politicians and all prime ministers in Malaysia have all been Malay's.

sounds like a horror story

Totally agree.

because it's from a lecture that came out a month ago. It's on UKposts, Royal Aeronautical Society MH370. Very interesting, scientific work

The flight path around the northern coast of Sumatra should have been considered suspicious from the start. Instead of simply flying west from Penang Island if there was an emergency onboard, the curving flight path looked intentional, as if the pilot flying wanted to avoid ATC and military radar.

yeah i thought this was another video with vague info and speculation just like the ones i've watched past few years. this is different, but how did this guy tells the story like he was sitting next to the pilot? like whats up with the sweater and coffee? did i miss something? is there any new records leaked to the public?

@@edytekken Total speculation.

Thank you so much! There will be many more videos to come ✈️

Subscribed 👍

Cute

Plz what I don't understand is how did they have all this information especially after the plane went of the Rader,.. yet they can't find the plane.. so who gave them d information of what happend inside d plane?.. am confused

@@ibrahimsadiq9050 guessing and inserting details to make a compelling story

Poetic indeed.."At this point Captain Zaharies presence in the cockpit was superfluous" The narrator says in reference to captain's removal of his own oxygen mask😢

Darn good investigative account of a complex crime. The question that remains in my mind is how an experienced airline captain can do such a thing without warning. Same for the Germanwing first officer. How can such occurrences be prevented?

​@@batifola3463now, there must be at least two crew members in the cockpit at any given time.

​@@batifola3463 you could prevent incidents like this but at the cost of enabling hijackers to take over the controls. It's an unfortunate trade-off - you either give the crew the ability to keep others from the cockpit no matter what, or you enable others to get into it. There is no perfect solution. Ultimately given how incredibly rare incidents like this are vs the countless hijackings that have happened throughout history, this seems like a reasonable decision, but unfortunately no solution is 100% secure.

@@streettrialsandstuffthat was the rule when I was left alone in a cockpit last year so it’s easily ignored.

FALSE

@@leelunk8235caps so tru

I was actually on a cruise in Asia at the time. I remember my uncle saying a plane crashed with over 200 people. He said they haven't found the plane, but will find it.

I find it insane you actually believe that lol.

What??? No mate.

I have lack of aviation knowledge, just a basic question to you: Why didn't any other aircraft detect the presence of MH370 while it was flying over the southern Indian ocean? Don't aircrafts detect large objects, such as another airplane, using sensors, even if the satellite transponder is off?

@@shawonahmed5775if you are talking about the ability of aircraft to detect other aircraft at night without needing Air Traffic Control, then there is a technology for that called Traffic Collision Avoidance System （TCAS）. TCAS involves the transponders of at least 2 nearby planes communicating to each other altitude, speed, position and heading information of the planes they are installed in. If TCAS systems on 2 planes detects that said 2 planes are about to collide then it sends out audio instructions to the pilots of the respective aircraft on what action to take, mainly to climb or descend. When there is no longer a threat of mid-air collision it sends out the message “clear of conflict”. But despite offloading quite a lot of work from ATC controllers who being human are still prone to human errors, TCAS has 2 big potential weaknesses. 1) unlike Stick Pushers (an anti-stall system installed on some commercial aircraft to augment the usual stall warning systems) TCAS is not capable of directly forcing the plane to climb or descend if the pilots do not respond to it or properly follow its instructions (descend instead of climb for example). And 2) TCAS depends on the transponder being on and properly functioning. Weakness number 1 is one of the primary contributing factors behind the 2002 Uberlingen mid-air collision in which a DHL 757 freighter and a chartered Bashkirian Airlines Tupolev Tu-154 collided in mid-air over the Swiss-German border. The DHL crew followed their TCAS instruction to descend, but the Russian crew in the Tu-154 followed the ATC controller’s instruction to descend instead of following their TCAS instruction to climb. By the time the 2 planes saw each other the closing speeds were such that there was almost no way to avoid the collision. Why the Russian crew did not follow their TCAS instruction was primarily down to cultural issues and TCAS being a relatively new technology at the time. Even though TCAS had been under development since the 1980s, it was only in the 1990s to turn of the millennium era was TCAS made mandatory equipment on civilian airliners whether old, newly built or newly designed. In the western aviation world, if pilots encountered TCAS giving instructions that were different to that given by a ATC controller, they were trained to follow TCAS instructions and inform the controller of such. But everywhere else in the world and the former Soviet states in this case, there was no such training for this kind of scenario, and because ATC has historically been nearly infallible despite humans being in the feedback loop, the Russian pilots followed the ATC controller’s instructions instead of TCAS even though TCAS was correct and the controller was wrong. After this collision, all pilot training worldwide mandated that TCAS instructions always take precedent over ATC. Weakness 2 means that if a transponder is off (as in MH370), malfunctioning or accidentally put into the wrong mode, then TCAS in said plane won’t work even if the transponder and TCAS in a nearby plane is working. In 2006, a brand new Embraer Legacy business jet sliced the wing off a Gol Transportes Aeroes 737 over the Amazon rainforest in a head-on mid-air collision in 37,000 feet. The Embraer jet successfully landed at a military airfield but the 737 crashed. At the moment of the collision, the Embraer jet’s transponder was in standby mode (basically transponder off) and its TCAS would not be on in that mode. In addition, systemic administrative and training related flaws in Brazilian area ATC meant that Brazilian controllers handling the plane thought the Embraer was at its assigned altitude of 36,000 feet instead of its actual altitude of 37,000 feet (important to note that Embraer’s flight plan called for an initial cruise altitude of 37,000 feet then descend to 36,000 feet after passing the Brasilia VOR radio beacon). The thing is, ATC instructions, because they are told live to the pilots as they are flying, can always override filed flight plans in case of unusual circumstances. And due to the confusion in the area ATC, Brazilian controllers did not tell the Embraer to descend to 36,000 feet since they thought it was there already. Why the Embraer’s transponder was shut off is debated to this day, but the theory with the most weight (presented by Brazilian investigators) was that the Embraer pilots accidentally shut it off while they were troubleshooting the plane’s systems (its also important to note that preparations for this flight were pretty rushed, explaining why they were problem solving in the air instead of before the flight). Neither pilot noticed the “TCAS OFF” message on their flight displays, both troubleshooting the problem instead of one solving the problem whilst the other pays attention to their instruments as per their likely Crew Resource Management training. But at the time, if TCAS is turned off whilst the plane is airborne, it wasn’t mandatory to have an audible warning to tell pilots TCAS was off - just messages on the flight display in the case of the Embraer plane. If you look at the Strait of Malacca on Flightradar24 (which tracks civilian aircraft and some military aircraft using ADS-B) you will notice that it’s a moderately trafficked air corridor dominated by planes heading to and from northwest of Singapore airport. How MH370 could successfully navigate this corridor at 2 am without colliding with other planes due to no TCAS can be explained by a combination of half asleep night shift civilian and military ATC controllers, and the fact that this is a very off-peak time period for airports in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.

@@shawonahmed5775 if you are talking about the ability of aircraft to detect other aircraft at night without needing Air Traffic Control, then there is a technology for that called Traffic Collision Avoidance System （TCAS）. TCAS involves the transponders of at least 2 nearby planes communicating to each other altitude, speed, position and heading information of the planes they are installed in. If TCAS systems on 2 planes detects that said 2 planes are about to collide then it sends out audio instructions to the pilots of the respective aircraft on what action to take, mainly to climb or descend. When there is no longer a threat of mid-air collision it sends out the message “clear of conflict”. But despite offloading quite a lot of work from ATC controllers who being human are still prone to human errors, TCAS has 2 big potential weaknesses. 1) unlike Stick Pushers (an anti-stall system installed on some commercial aircraft to augment the usual stall warning systems) TCAS is not capable of directly forcing the plane to climb or descend if the pilots do not respond to it or properly follow its instructions (descend instead of climb for example). And 2) TCAS depends on the transponder being on and properly functioning. Weakness number 1 is one of the primary contributing factors behind the 2002 Uberlingen mid-air collision in which a DHL 757 freighter and a chartered Bashkirian Airlines Tupolev Tu-154 collided in mid-air over the Swiss-German border. The DHL crew followed their TCAS instruction to descend, but the Russian crew in the Tu-154 followed the ATC controller’s instruction to descend instead of following their TCAS instruction to climb. By the time the 2 planes saw each other the closing speeds were such that there was almost no way to avoid the collision. Why the Russian crew did not follow their TCAS instruction was primarily down to cultural issues and TCAS being a relatively new technology at the time. Even though TCAS had been under development since the 1980s, it was only in the 1990s to turn of the millennium era was TCAS made mandatory equipment on civilian airliners whether old, newly built or newly designed. In the western aviation world, if pilots encountered TCAS giving instructions that were different to that given by a ATC controller, they were trained to follow TCAS instructions and inform the controller of such. But everywhere else in the world and the former Soviet states in this case, there was no such training for this kind of scenario, and because ATC has historically been nearly infallible despite humans being in the feedback loop, the Russian pilots followed the ATC controller’s instructions instead of TCAS even though TCAS was correct and the controller was wrong. After this collision, all pilot training worldwide mandated that TCAS instructions always take precedent over ATC. Weakness 2 means that if a transponder is off (as in MH370), malfunctioning or accidentally put into the wrong mode, then TCAS in said plane won’t work even if the transponder and TCAS in a nearby plane is working. In 2006, a brand new Embraer Legacy business jet sliced the wing off a Gol Transportes Aeroes 737 over the Amazon rainforest in a head-on mid-air collision in 37,000 feet. The Embraer jet successfully landed at a military airfield but the 737 crashed. At the moment of the collision, the Embraer jet’s transponder was in standby mode (basically transponder off) and its TCAS would not be on in that mode. In addition, systemic administrative and training related flaws in Brazilian area ATC meant that Brazilian controllers handling the plane thought the Embraer was at its assigned altitude of 36,000 feet instead of its actual altitude of 37,000 feet (important to note that Embraer’s flight plan called for an initial cruise altitude of 37,000 feet then descend to 36,000 feet after passing the Brasilia VOR radio beacon). The thing is, ATC instructions, because they are told live to the pilots as they are flying, can always override filed flight plans in case of unusual circumstances. And due to the confusion in the area ATC, Brazilian controllers did not tell the Embraer to descend to 36,000 feet since they thought it was there already. Why the Embraer’s transponder was shut off is debated to this day, but the theory with the most weight (presented by Brazilian investigators) was that the Embraer pilots accidentally shut it off while they were troubleshooting the plane’s systems (its also important to note that preparations for this flight were pretty rushed, explaining why they were problem solving in the air instead of before the flight). Neither pilot noticed the “TCAS OFF” message on their flight displays, both troubleshooting the problem instead of one solving the problem whilst the other pays attention to their instruments as per their likely Crew Resource Management training. But at the time, if TCAS is turned off whilst the plane is airborne, it wasn’t mandatory to have an audible warning to tell pilots TCAS was off - just messages on the flight display in the case of the Embraer plane. If you look at the Strait of Malacca on Flightradar24 (which tracks civilian aircraft and some military aircraft using ADS-B) you will notice that it’s a moderately trafficked air corridor dominated by planes heading to and from northwest of Singapore airport. How MH370 could successfully navigate this corridor at 2 am without colliding with other planes despite having no TCAS can be explained by a combination of half asleep night shift civilian and military ATC controllers, and the fact that this is a very off-peak time period for airports in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. In addition, the plane’s flight path involved attempting to follow the borders of flight information regions aka it was flying along the edge of the radar coverage of various area control centers in Sumatra and Malaysia. And even though radars do overlap into the FIRs of other countries, because of the Chicago convention of 1944, the area ATC controllers who might have seen MH370’s unidentified blip on primary radar may have assumed it was under the control of the adjacent area control center instead of theirs. In addition, tired or complacent controllers in the middle of the night may not picked up the fact that there was a plane with no transponder flying ALONG FIR borders instead of into or out of them.

I feel for his family, and the other affected by this tradegy, but foul play seems very clear from this video. I do hope the bulk of the wreckage is found soon to give the families with missing lost ones closure.

@@shawonahmed57751. The southern Indian ocean is vastly empty and is really large. 2. Aircrafts can't detect other aircrafts. The ATC does that for them. So an aircraft doesn't know there is a plane near them until the ATC alerts them. For example when flying in fog. The ATC alerts them of where nearby aircraft are but the aircraft themselves cant detect each other.

Its not documentary. Its creative writing. Anything that takes place on the plane is speculation at best, completely made up at worst.

It's logical hypothesis of what likely happened. All the pieces fit.

the netflix 'documentary' was actual creative writing. this is more of a documentary explaining what happened with filling some of the gaps with assumptioms@@TheGreatDanish

@@luxemier​​⁠​the Netflix documentary was definitely something else than this video, this video is many levels above. But both are technically creative writing, because no video will EVER be able to tell you what actually happened during that flight. This video definitely tells you what MOST LIKELY happened, but without the black box we wouldn’t even be close to determine anything with certainty. Filling “some of the gaps” with assumptions is in my opinion treating this video a bit too lightly, there’s a lot of assumptions in this video, seemingly great assumptions! LEMMiNOs video of this incident is a true example of a documentary of what happened, because that video never assumes anything that isn’t actually known, with proof backing it up. This video and LEMMiNOs is the two most educational videos that exist for people wanting to know what this tragedy was actually about

@@TheGreatDanishthis was the most likely scenario, a 777 doesn’t just disappear… wide body planes so many back up systems

I’m glad you enjoyed it!

@@GreenDotAviation Still dosent explain why he did it??????

@@billb7876…. your conspiracy theorist hat is showing. Where, did you get Americas Military from after watching this video? I’m so lost with your comment.

​@@billb7876why (and how?) would American military hijack and crash an unremarkable airliner into the Indian Ocean for no reason whatsoever ?

@@billb7876I’m glad your comment specified “‘enough said,’” because you really did not say enough

@@billb7876 And your evidence??? Or is that just your wishful speculation?

@@roviwoteap2375 hypocrisy - the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

Couldn't believe it when he said that.

Just a simple calculation.

🤓 "just a simpke calculation"

Did you expect time to stop or what

@@phoneyphonepretty sure they meant that time flew faster than ever but alright.

Germanwings Flight 9525 which happened nearly exactly a year later proves without a doubt that such human actions are possible. Also, what happens in the United States to schools and other crowded places also shows what depraved acts humans are capable of. The fact that so many pilots want to deny this is quite telling. Unfortunately, denial doesn't change the facts.

Thank you! Any idea what the track at around 55:00??

@@Hispania_45 I'm sorry I couldn't find it but it's very likely it's either 'face of fear - gavin brivik' or 'reality of the goal - gavin brivik' however, there is no link on UKposts

There is, it's called called an "ELT" (Emergency Locater Transmitter) & it sends faint pings to radar scanners & they stay active for 30 days. MH370 (9M-MRO) had four installed on the aircraft. Now, what should've happened after the last ping around 8:19am is the ELT would go off & again stay active for 30 days. The weird part is that they didn't go off, the final report cites this as "unexplained discrepancy" as they found the four ELTs on board to be working according to maintaince checks. One reason they claim why they didn't go off is due to 1 of 2 end of flight situations, 1 of the reasons they believe the ELT either failed or didn't activate at all is due to investigators believing that rather than Zaharie killing himself shortly after making the final turn of 188⁰, he instead was conscious for the entire flight out to the remote parts of the southern indian ocean & gently glided/ditched the aircraft onto the ocean surface in such a way that the ELT didn't activate. Hope this cleared up your doubt!

Yes its a horrific and bizarre feel.. Everybody deserve a closure and the cold hearted pilot didn't even spare a thought for this... till date i do not understand what did he achieved by this fanatic act... apart from bringing disgrace to his family and friends.

@@mishtic8024 This thing is pure fiction and never happened, it's speculation ffs. If anything it's closer to the german flight crash where the copilot did proven to commit it.

You don’t know anything. Seriously you don’t. Especially if it was a Govt cover up. It could have been Kurt Cobains killer, you don’t know.

It's not an empty casket but contain deceased passenger soul in it

@@waxl4449 I said empty casket cause they were never able to recover the bodies

Flight sim data was different. FBI ruled it a dead end. The journalist that reported it also is the same one from the Netflix show about the Russian hackers

​@@DeclanHiggins__ Any attempt to exculpate the captain strikes me as lame in the extreme. You have a crime with just one possible suspect, and you still can't get it right?

@@wrathofatlantis2316 I never made a claim about the captains guilt or innocence, I just merely pointed out that the flight sim data is not strong evidence

@@DeclanHiggins__ Fair enough. So on the flight sim there was no strange prolonged flights to nowhere over the Indian ocean (or similar odd course reversals to nowhere in different directions), and there was no detected attempt to erase those particular flight paths at the exclusion of others? That would indeed make the sim connection just an urban legend. Of course that would change nothing as to his guilt, but it is interesting that such a claim would be widely disseminated with nothing to support it. Wouldn't be the first time.

@@wrathofatlantis2316 well the thing is, we don’t know. It was found on an old Hard drive in a fragmented file with literally thousands of cached locations. The FBI ended up dismissing it because it wasn’t really evidence. There’s no way to tell the locations were even from the same flight. All it could tell them was that in some point in the captains flight simming, his plane was in those locations, as well as thousands of other locations in the file. I think the much more damming evidence against the captain is that the flight transponder was manually switched off

watch the Royal Aeronautical Society Lecuture on mh370. It came out a month ago on their youtube channel. Very interesting

@@moosesnWoop thank you; very interesting. I have comments but this is not the appropriate venue. I will only say that also as a formet (private) pilot I find the controlled ditching scenario very unlikely. In total darkness the perception of the three dimensions is next to nil. Nevertheless their proposed scenarion cannot be dismissed outright becaue it has many valid points.

@@moosesnWoop where is this video pls

I wrote this above : I often wondered if this pilot was such an airline geek and so depressed that he just hijaked an airliner to try things with a 777 that he alway wanted to try . He wanted to go out doing things he couldn't do on commercial flights. If he stole an empty airliner the military would be notified to stop him . I can imagine he went to super High Altitudes, dives, rolling bank angles . We have no idea what stress maneuvers he did over the ocean. I also heard somewhere he wanted to get even with Gov. for sentencing a friend to prison . If so , the national airline losing a plane is a good way to hit the Government hard in the pocket. One thing he didn't prepare for (thank God )is that He didn't know that the satellite company Inmarsat could track him. Imagine that We would still be looking for this plane in the China sea or in Vietnam!!

@@lorenzodelfino5894 well assuming the ditching happened towards the end of the flight, it would be around 8 am so the sun would have been up by then.

Except that they are slandering a man with no evidence whatsoever. WTF do they think it is Zahari? Could have been the co-pilot. Could have been a cabin crew. Could have been a passenger who hijacked the aircraft. Flying the aircraft is not that complicated. Anybody could do it with a few hours research watching videos on UKposts. You just use the auto-pilot. It's the takeoff and landings that's more difficult. You could probably learn how to program the flight computer with a few days of online research. It cannot be that complicated.

@@danielch6662i thought the same thing, what if it is the co pilot or someone else.

at least they did not suffer much apparently

i dont think that anyone but the captain was capable off doing it, since the route suggests a lot of experience in flying between radars, zones etc, and he also practiced this flight at home on his computer. you really should watch the whole vid again@@danielch6662

​​​@@danielch6662 Too much advanced systems shut-downs at well timed locations in the air were carried out to be rogue cabin crews, passengers or terrorists. This was a well timed act of a well-trained pilot or a flight engineer on board the aircraft.

Wow, thank you!

@@GreenDotAviationthere is no way you know any of this information without them finding the airplane

​@@augustusplays7896Like what? He pointed out all known facts, every speculation in the video is based on occam's razor. Every other theory has no logical reasoning, or facts backing them up. Why would the pilot coincidentally delete his flight sim, just before his last flight, even though his life is centered around aviation and he has an expensive sim setup? That's as close to an admission of guilt as you can get. To have the opinion it was rigged, is irrational and likely based on the proportionality bias.

@@Hypagon Occam’s razor allows him to speculate that he told co pilot go get coffee? And depressurize the plane? Cmon man, it’s fiction lol

@@augustusplays7896 So you think the point of the video is invalid, because he speculated about a few minor details that are entirely irrelevant to the case? They are only there to paint the picture. You just fell for the base rate fallacy.

I totally agree

Agreed

Only criticism…. There were moments when I said “you made that up… how could you know that detail…” otherwise amazing video

@@abaez008 I agree, but he did say this was the most likely scenario from the available information, so those "made up" details are educated best guesses. It would have been clumsy if he said "our best guess is" over and over. I agree with you, it really is an amazing video.

It is more fiction than truth...

Thanks for commenting, glad you found it interesting

what interesting?! you made a narrative without any proof😂

@@4NallaSuman There is proof in the video. How is this video made without proof then? And yes, there is physical proof.

Most Malaysian understandably would not want to accept this as MAS is a national carrier - their pride rest on it. And to blame one of their own would be so cynically calculated is just unfathomably insulting. It's easier to blame others or make other assertion/s - valid or not, and backed up by proof or not.

Speculation aside. We will never know until it’s found, so a conclusion with minor assumptions and collectively agreed upon experts is all we can get.

They have the deny button no matter what in case a highjacker gets any code opening the door which is still the same problem if the copilot has his own code or a third secret code which is just as secret as the second code.

@@ErinJeanette Since 2001, there have been around 10 successful hijackings which involved an passenger forcing their way onto the flight deck. And there hasn't been a single innocent casualty or incident of a plane flying into a ground structure. Yet the death toll from death by pilot since 2013 alone stands at 554. Hijackings are virtually unheard these days and are even more rare when they involve a person with suicidal motives. You do not compromise safety by allowing the pilot/co-pilot the ability to override being locked out of the cockpit by the other member of the flight crew. But it would have prevented MH370, GermanWings Flight 9525 and China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735. The scenario you're imagining, where a hijacker gets access to a code which allows them onto the flight deck, is so far fetched.

@@1532JJ I'm not saying you're wrong, I just think that's the reason because I said the same thing, I couldn't BELIEVE a pilot was able to do any of this and shut their communication off essentially to the world and then lock a copilot out that's insane!

Truly ironic that due to 911, when there were likely no hijackers, just digital manipulation or drones, people think hijacking is a common threat to everyday fight travel. So rare especially with all the security technology used just to board a flight.

As cabin crew I can tell you that we do have procedures that contradict some parts of this video. For example, at no time is the cockpit occupied by only one person. The purser, or lead flight attendant would have been in there if the first officer had come out.

Enjoy! 🙌

@@GreenDotAviationalready being enjoyed in my household, I can hear my flatmate watching it on his laptop through the house!

I enjoyed each second ❤

@@marcosolo6491 Can you put up your own documentary or speculative fiction for us to compare then? Ta

Was ripping the piss @@marcosolo6491

What about a predator drone armed with bombs, every second getting closer to destruction. 😮

@@SnozberriesTasteLikeSnozberrys oh what I was talking about just a passenger plane full of corpses just cruising in the air like a ghost ship

@@AssassinsFear oh my mistake lol. I thought we were just going in on the terror of robot aircrafts as a whole 🤣 But yea ghost ship plane is very chilling.

But there *was* someone alive on the plane for the entire flight.

@@Bob31415 maybe, maybe not

Did you watch the recent 2-parter done by The Lore Lodge? It was as painful as it was infuriating. I went in with an open mind and genuinely hoped it would give me another perspective to at least understand why others believe some of the conspiracies. I had to stop it multiple times and force myself to go back to finish it, and it only made me less understanding of the wild theories out there. I’m curious to know what others thought of it after watching Green Dots narrative.

@@deborahbates470 I don't know that channel, I'll check it out.

Power interruption and power restoration can make SDU go off and on.

That's what I'm saying. It can't be turned on or off from the cockpit or anywhere else and it can't go off by itself.@@bricedesmaures6216

@@bricedesmaures6216 Yes thats what I said, but power interruptions are incredibly rare.

@@Sunburst75 This whole situation is a massive outlier so it's fine to assume that rare things happened.

@@EGarrett01 The power went off after the turn at Igari, and it almost certainly went off in the radar dead zone. It comes back on again about 40 minutes later, which just happened to be outside Indonesian radar range. It then stays on until the end as there was no need to cut the power again as there was only 1 person left alive on board. The question is, who did it?

This was excellent and very convincing, unlike the offensive, ghoulish cack being doled out on Netflux and so many thousands of websites. There is one thing though: I was really hoping he'd at least give the latest assessments of Richard Godfrey and his WSPR flightpath identification theories. In fact this still seems to be plausible. However the path calculated by using WSPR (OTHR) is not straight, suggesting the Zaharie didn't just switch into auto-pilot. mh370search dortkom.

This was excellent and very convincing, unlike the offensive, ghoulish conspiracy nonsense still being doled out on Netflux and so many thousands of websites. There is one thing though: I was really hoping he'd at least give the latest assessments of Richard Godfrey and his WSPR flightpath identification theories. In fact this still seems to be plausible. However the path calculated by using WSPR (OTHR) is not straight, suggesting the Zaharie didn't switch into auto-pilot. But the evidence of a rapid final descent is very convincing. mh370search dortkom.

This was excellent and very convincing, unlike the offensive, ghoulish conspiracy rubbish being doled out on Netflux and so many thousands of websites. There is one thing though: I was really hoping he'd at least give the latest assessments of Richard Godfrey and his WSPR flightpath identification theories. In fact this still seems to be plausible. However the path calculated by using WSPR (OTHR) is not straight, suggesting the Zaharie didn't just switch into auto-pilot. mh370search dortkom.

Apologies to those who were fascinated with this video. This is one of the most baseless doc on MH370 ever produced. Blurring the boundary between facts and fiction. How in the world, this guy knows the specific details of what the Captain told his first captain when the plane's black box has never been found. Sweater and coffee, making holes in the plane, utter nonsense!! You cannot make someone guilty until it's proven and you cannot prove something based on fiction.

😮

That's much appreciated, thank you. It is an incredibly eerie scenario.

I agree! It's very well done.

@@GreenDotAviation I've learned a lot thanks to your videos! I've never truly understood why air accidents happen until watching your videos, as well as how heroic/resourceful some of these captains had to be in order to save their planes. (And how bad the airline standard/training in my country, Indonesia, is.) But I have a question-- was there a big discovery/development that allowed you guys to zero in on this theory? I actually remembered watching a video covering this here-- I remembered the details about the captain having the flight simulator on this exact path, as well as that sharp turn toward the South that made everyone look for the wrong spot in the Indian Ocean-- but some of details are new-- like the intentional depressurizing of the cabin... Did that actually happen (like was it actually done in the flight simulator?), or was it just the most likely theory, since that's pretty much the best way for the captain to get rid of everyone who could meddle with this bizarre plan? (Or did I miss something, perhaps like something explained in the opening? Anyone is free to point out/answer for me too.) (I want to share this video with a friend, but I'd like to be able to explain if there was some sort of new development that made this refined theory possible.) Maybe I'm giving the captain too much credit, but I wonder if he was trying to prove how disastrous things can get if the captain of a plane were actually malicious...

There was at least ten man hours of Oxygen in the cabin? and the crew sat down and used the overheads, thats logical. SO, they assume given that amount of oxygen, that no one could get through the cockpit door. I could, and so could many engineers.Were there any engineering types aboard? OH, just a few! the door is designed to stop a determined hijacker,not several clever people with at least half an hour of oxygen. It is designed to deny entry in a reasonable amount of time, so I assumed there was not enough oxygen avaliable in the cabin for anyone to spend half an hour or more on the door, but apparently there was! Also, the SATCOM had no AC supply, the Left hand AC bus was down for a while. How many systems does that degrade? ALSO, the transponder transmitting a height of 0ft prior to going off completely. I need to see the evidence...Secondery radar operates by transmitting a transpond request to the aircraft WHEN the radar antenna is pointing to it. So, are you saying a change happened in that small window of time, or the next sweep? More questions than answers.... The one question I would like answered, how many people on board were pilots themselves?

@@GreenDotAviation You are amazing, this one is your best one yet. Can I ask you though your opinion, could this guy have stolen this aircraft to sell on? Obs to do so he would have had to kill the passengers. Change his name, get on with his life a few million pounds better off?

Thank you! 🙏🏼

Mentor Pilot is less speculative and more knowledgeable about the actions happening

That's insightful! I can't believe the airline decided this flight without a second captain would be good enough!

@Ira__L This was my takeaway also unfortunately as soon as I heard about the direct turns, flight sim and electronics coming back on. I wonder if it may have been a cultural trend in some Asian countries where elders and veterans are given the benefit of the doubt, so they couldn’t have thought that Captain Shah would have done anything, so they went along with his likely request for MH370 to be a training flight without a second thought.

Yeah, this is it, and it is obvious and undeniable. The evidence is way too strong. Sadly, I am familiar with another disaster, where the pilot used the post-911 cabin door to keep everyone from stopping him doing the unthinkable.

@@samueljennings4809 Nothing to do with Asian culture at all. Malaysia Airlines is owned by the government. They don't want to be held responsible or liable. They don't want the embarrassment of their incompetence being exposed either. How did they not realize they were chasing a projected flight path for so long? Why was there such a catastrophic failure in communication between different parties (airline, towers, government, military, etc.)? Why didn't they scramble jets when their military primary radars picked up the rogue plane? Why do all the official reports by the Malaysian government rule out every possible explanation except murder-suicide but still claim that they don't know what happened? Very simply, they don't want people to know.

Pilot made a deal with secret military entities to deliver the scientists and plane full of people as ordered

Correct, the Malaysian police even pretty much announced the motive

Me too. Why? Why take 238 innocent people out because you want to end your life?? I suppose it's something only an unstable mind could justify. Could it be that combined with wanting to end his life he wanted to see if he actually could make the plane disappear & in effect leaving everyone to wonder if it was an intentional dumping, suicide & mass murder on his part????Was it a personal challenge done with the last moments he had here on earth??? I know this is the most plausible theory & I do agree. Early on I said the only thing worse than losing a loved one on a flight that disappeared is having that loved one wrongly accused as being the one responsible for doing it. I wanted to stay with the whole innocent until proven guilty with evidence to support it theory. Ten years on & still no answers I've come to believe this theory is the most plausible as it could very well be the closest thing to answers as anybody gets.

@@OriginalSeblakCeker What was the pilot's motive?

@@user-sy4mp8hq6iHow we can believe this is What happened there is no clear evidence at all

@@OriginalSeblakCeker Do you have a Link?