Trouble is... the majority of solicitors are bloody useless. Duty solicitors are worse than useless. Unless you KNOW the solicitor personally, best course is simply to say that you will make a written statement, via your solicitor, in due course. Then shut up. Say NOTHING. Not "no comment" just keep quiet. The threat that your silence can be used against you is only valid in certain circumstances - basically where you wouldn't have a hope in hell of pleading not guilty anyway.

@@johnriggs4929 thank you

Don't talk to them ever, solicitor or no solicitor- COMMON LAW (Law of the land) - upheld by a police constable. No one is above common law, and those in breach of common law will be tried in a common law court before a jury of their peers. There must be a victim in common law and they do not need your name, as the victim and/or witnesses will point you out as being the perpetrator. Common law - 1 - You cannot hurt anyone 2 - You cannot steal anyone's property 3 - You cannot damage anyone's property 4 - You cannot defraud anyone 5 - You cannot commit breach of the peace towards anyone 6 - You cannot commit treason (or sedition), towards the crown. And that's common law ☝️, that's it and NOTHING ELSE. ACTS AND STATUTES OF PARLIAMENT (Commercial law, contract law, law of the sea, admiralty law) - upheld by a police officer. Only applies to certain groups (Road Traffic Act applies to drivers of vehicles etc) and needs your consent to enforce it, of which they will try to get using legalease ("Do you understand" - meaning do you 'under stand' ((stand under)) my authority). They need your name to issue fines and court dates, (as "Mr Hate crime" can't point you out in court - and no court usher ever shouts out "Occupier to court one"), You are the only one who can give or confirm your name, so NEVER give it. Your answer to every question should be - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Your answer to every request should be - "I don't want to do anything you tell me to do, but I will do because I feel threatened by you" (They always "ask you" to do something rather than 'tell you' because then you've accepting their authority), and it's VERY important that people don't fall for the "Do you want to" etc etc, because this is where they will trap you. Q - "What's your name?" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "What's your address?" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "If you don't tell me you'll be arrested" A - "I retain my common law right to remain silent" Q - "Well I'm arresting you blah blah blah, 'do you understand'?" A - "No I do not stand under your authority" Q - "Ok well do you want to come this way" A - "I don't want to do anything you tell me to do, but I will do because I feel threatened by you" And before anyone points out that they can get your name from a driving license or passport etc, those are fraudulent documents created from a birth certificate that clearly states across the bottom - "A certificate is not evidence of identity". Let's not forget that the first thing a police constable says to you when he/she arrests you is - "You do not have to say anything", Because, believe it or not - YOU DON'T. You do NOT have to speak to a police constable. You do NOT have to speak to the desk sergeant at the police station. You do NOT have to have a police interview. You do NOT have to attend court. Exercise your God given inalienable common law rights, they're yours and cannot be taken away by anyone, especially by some police officer using his/her uniform to commit treason and fraud by acting as a government bailiff. Police constables swear an oath before God to serve the Monach and protect people and property. They DO NOT swear an oath to protect the government. They swear their oath raising their right hand, if they did the same in a court, they would receive two years for perjury.

Whatever you say say nothing. Its that simple and as pointed out above by @john riggs, duty solicitors are not to be used. They are relying on the police for work and piss in the same pot

@@GH-lo8vl What a spaz 🤣🤣

exactly and the first to complain will automatically be believed by the cops and the accused will automatically be considered guilty I have experience and lost all confidence in them and they do lie to you

Absolutely true.

@@josephberrie9550 Me too, and exactly my own experience Joseph. Your complete innocence does not matter in the least and is no protection in some circumstsmces.

There is that little thing called 'evidence', which the police and courts require to secure a conviction.

@@rackitman5950 I'd agree at one time, but it turns out now that someone's say-so can be enough now. Also, even without a conviction they can destroy lives, health and careers based on a complete lie. I know because it happened to me depsite being NFA and genuinely completely innocent. Its terrifying to know that at any moment someone only has to pick up the phone and tell a ridiculous lie you'll be thrown in a cell for 20+ hours, denied medication you need for chronic pain every 12 hours and they will even ring your boss and try to get you fired. The lie does not even have to be half sensible and they'll do this to you. Evidence does not matter in the least to them- only trying to get a chalk does.

You do not have to attend voluntary interviews, it means they do not have evidence of an offence and are trying to get it, Even if you are an aledged witness. Maintain your right to remain silent! This right was confirmed by the Justices in Neale v DPP (Feb 2021), also that remaining silent is not the offence of wilful obstruction!

Honestly it depends on the circumstances. Before one gets paranoid, the nature of the police interest in you needs to be established, which can be established by simply asking. Their answer should indicate if you should be concerned. If you are being actually interviewed, then of course you need a solicitor present. If you clearly are not the object in the case and are merely a witness giving a statement, then don't worry.

@@Brightstarlivesteam sometimes one needs to give evidence through a statement, which requires a visit to the police station. It's wrong not to help if a crime has been committed. The best advice is to establish the level of interest the police have in you.

Rafal Sony Absolutely... I have had a friend of a friend in the past. Where their life was destroyed quite simply because the Police "Had thought" They "got their Man".... When in fact they where just destroying his life.. One of the mistakes that came to my attention... Was that he, was "just answering a couple of questions" the police had for him. When they where actually interviewing him. And he did NOT even realize it! The police where THAT slippery... Now this was a while ago. He got cleared... And was suing the police for damages. And there WHERE damages. He even lost his job for their mistakes. Best to remain silent. And get a damned good lawyer. Police ARE not your friends.....

@@gunner678 You are wrong, there is plenty of evidence, that innocent people have been arrested by the policemen for inadvertently making an innocent verbal remark and due to deliberate mistakes on statement, so as to misconstrue what was actually said. If you maintain you right to remain silent, then these "MISTAKES" will not happen! The only thing the police want to do is stitch you up and get one more crime cleared up!

Thats ridiculous! Paranoia as its worst. Maybe if you lived a clean lifestyle you could live in a more realistic world. .

@@lynnkjjones7066 . I live a clean lifestyle, always have. What’s ridiculous is, being critical of someone’s lifestyle you have no knowledge of.

@@grumpygramps1451 Lynn hasn't got a clue

The police have one purpose in life, to sucessfuprosecute as many people as possible. They are not on our side. The old bill have been pulling the wool over people's eyes for years with PR stunts like Police Camera Action but essentially they see us as the enemy. That's why don't have any non-police friends and always look the other way when one of them is up to no good.

@@grumpygramps1451 What's ridiculous is painting all police with the same brush. Like saying all old grumpy men are senile. I hope you don't teach your grandkids how to be disrespectful.

Looooooooool, that's funny, not only does nobody on Earth speak like that nor is there any need, we have SOLICITORS in UK not "Lawyers". It is suffice to say "no comment" and "I want my solicitor!" Nuff said...

Ninja, it costs nothing to be ultra polite. It will not be seen as aggressive or overly defensive.

Especially in this day and age of such a corrupt and aggressive Stasi like force we have in this Country now.

@@ukbusman you have no idea about the stasi, so dont try to compare

@@BlutoandCo Comment on the video, not the commentary. You have no idea what I do and do not know, so button it lad.

Guilty until “proven” guilty I would suggest

And the onus is no longer for them to prove that you're guilty, the onus is very much now that you have to prove your own innocence.

It’s the same in the States, provided you live long enough to go to trial.

@@chrisellis1232 In the grim 70s it was 'innocent until proven Irish'.

In NZ ,you guilty regardless ,the onus is on you to prove that you even have right to justice.

IS THAT ALL YOU NEED TO SAY TO THEM IN SCOTLAND MY FREIND,?? I AM going through this myself, i would tell you the story but .. man anybody could see this and make things even worse..........

Socrates said it himself. Silence is a very powerful thing

@Derek Anthony Farmer The right to remain silent is never lost, but in many cases you have to explicitly invoke it.

I reckon you did commit it ;) come on now lets be honest.

After doing jury service I now call the jury "twelve idiots in a box". The jury make immediate judgement about EVRYONE in the court and no amount of evidence will change their minds about the defendant. Maybe we should teach basic law in school. The police would not like that.

fantastic prinny andy, or do you prefer andy pandy, the kiddies favourite?

🤣🤣🤣

@@mickrichardson4902 She was 18. Just saying.

@@Jin-Ro Someone said she was over eighteen.

You should use your regular knickname..."RANDY ANDY" 🤔..and how was that pizza from pizza express on the night in question 🤔 a bit "cheesy" no doubt 😆

💯

The Guildford 4 also

@@DaBriars Indeed, and many more that didn't make headlines.

@Mark Weaver Yes! Although his wrongful conviction was largely police incompetence rather than an outright fit-up.

Renault 5.

Amen.

So odd. As a casual in my teens I'd say I was scared of nobody and definitely not the police. Ex army now and teach martial arts. When my mother raises her voice at my two brothers and I we shut up and hide. I always told the police don't take me home 😂😂. My five foot five mother just stuck the head in me once. Never gave her cheek again 😁

Ozzy Osbourne used the term "bollocking" a lot in his book. I guess that means being struck there, figuratively and literally?

@@MisterMikeTexas It means to give someone a hell of a telling off, a major verbal reprimand.

In the States they lie under oath, too, even though they're not supposed to.

They lie in court also They just can't stop

like being under oath makes a difference..?

what do you do if a public defender is all you can afford?

​@@sallywilson3088 time

@always right I truly don't understand your comment.

@always right For burglaries, right? I got it.

100% Agree with you, well said👏👏👏👏

Please don't lump bastards in with cops. Bastards are much nicer than that.

@@josephking6515 love your comment.

Agreed.

@@davidlathwell4880 Roy is speaking sarcastically.

99% of police are guilty of perjury, why are there never any charges put against them. ?. Simple they are a corrupt legal gang organised against the public that they are there to protect. Sanctioned by the residing Government you vote for. Well said Roy.

@@justintime1307 State sponsored. Both are as bent as a 6 " nail.

@@davidlathwell4880 The supreme court has determined that police are allowed to lie in the course of their duties.

Sage advice and I have done this myself….

100% correct, i did this myself once on a matter i wasn't connected with but they turned up at my door with Sherriff Officers as there was outstanding speeding tickets and parking fines for a car that belonged to the daughter of the lady we bought our house from. She hadn't changed the address on the V5. I told them "that lady no longer lives here, the deeds on the house are changed they (pointing at the police) can check that, that vehicle is not here i don't care who it's registered to that person doesn't live here i have nothing else to say to you and NO you cannot come in. No i won't come out and discuss the matter goodbye, door closed and locked. "

This is actually by design, they have already decided. In fact you are better of defending yourself.

I was in court some years ago and my solicitor may as well not have been there 🤬

Just like here in the States with our public defenders. Sometimes even a high-priced defense attorney will throw their client's case because connections. That's obscene! 😡

Public pretender

@@mickthebandit. I take it you don't have a lot of money, or are on benifits ?... You have NO CHANCE now unless you can afford a good one who isn't too fat yet and still trying to get a job with the crown !!!

@@Xiapete I was immediately suspicious when he wouldn't let me write my own statement, his excuse was lame as I have had a grammar school education and presumed that was not the case for him.

Colin Paterson. I've had similar on two occasions but not as serious as yours. The police were unhappy when I refused to sign a statement at the bottom of the sheet of paper but would only sign at the end of the statement as written, but I got my way. In another case I refused to give a statement unless I was given a copy of the hand written statement at the time, that didn't go down well but again I got my wish as they wanted a statement. The statement was incorrectly typed up to the benefit of the accused and I wouldn't have known if I hadn't insisted on the hand written copy.

Some would recommend initialling every line or gap so nothing can be inserted at a later date. Not that they would of course, our police are wonderful. Hhmmm!

I had similar re a theft from a shop I worked in. They had written that I had recognised the thieves , I refused to sign it and told them that was not what I had seen. They were not happy but I couldn’t care less,they literally kicked me out the station.

The process as described is certainly disquieting, not least because it's a minor "failing to stop/report an accident (damage only?) occurrence - no more. Police enquiries would then have been merely to enquire into it and to establish WHAT anyone who supposedly "failed to stop" had to say. Failing to stop involves having knowledge of an accident with the legal requirement to stop and exchange details on demand - or failing to report it to police thereafter according to circumstances. The evidence may indicate that the driver of a vehicle that had failed to stop should have known of the accident. After being given an initial report of such an accident, police on enquiry would have interviewed the suspected driver/owner about the allegation based on the report they had - and the circumstances - to allow him/her the opportunity to put their side of the story. There seems little point in an enquiring officer being partial in any respect since it involves two parties giving their sides of the story in a mundane every day traffic matter in which circumstances and actions can be explained before any court proceedings need commence. In this case, it seems that there was insufficient evidence to show that there was "knowledge" of an accident having occurred and No Further Action by police was decided.

You won't be calling them in an emergency then?

@@24694104 They wouldn´t come.

What doing their job and obeying the home secretary?

@@PhillRobinson Did the Home Secretsry tell them to go on their knees to violent Marxists ?

@@thepowerisinyou2886 Much more like the Soviet Union or East Germany. But they are never mentioned.

when was our consent ever sought..?

We NEVER were. Who in their right mind would consent to being Policed and surveiled.

@@robertdore9592 well to a degree we did consent to being policed in the uk and the relationship was sound for many decades. The relationship has become more dysfunctional only in recent years especially in the more urban areas. This is why the police were a largely unarmed force in the uk. The relationship has deteriorated and we now find that much of the force is armed. It would be interesting to examine the exact mechanism of the consent and how it might be withdrawn. As to the surveillance, we agreed to that in order to enable us to be safer and as we know, those who relinquish freedoms in return for safety pretty soon have neither. We must ensure that we keep control of trial by jury as it represents our last constitutional avenue to dismantle an over grown and hostile state.

Consent means voting for a Party that believes in law and order .

The police have never policed with our consent. The police are Crown servants, not public servants .

Well said: just the words "No comment," when the interview recording is played to a jury, can be damning - makes an interviewee appear cocky, like a hardened criminal. But... it"s easier said than done. Just remember these five words: NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE.

It WASN'T necessary to say "no comment" or anything else, now it kinda is (see Salinas vs Texas case). Even being silent now can be used as an admission of guilt in court, unfortunately. The only good-ish way to get out of the situation is to pledge the 6th, which means asking for a lawyer present and saying nothing more besides that.

@@ZwiekszoneRyzyko A case in America won't affect a case in the UK though.

@@ZwiekszoneRyzyko we also need to invoke the 5th, and inform them that we won't answer questions

even as a witness it's in your better interest(s) to have your attorney present during any questioning

The best thing is to say nothing. You don't need a solicitor until, perhaps you go to court. Even then, I wouldn't trust a solicitor to act in your best interests. They are 'officers' of the court first and foremost.

@@van-gabondramblinrose6398 Your man Martin Cray went to some trouble to assemble and deliver his professional legal advice. Then here in the comments we have a bunch of amateurs giving unprofessional advice, mostly anecdotal. Hilarious.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO SAY ANYTHING

No need to answer "no comment" to questions. Just sit there with a friendly absentminded smile on your face.

Don't say "no comment", say that you do not consent to being interviewed and that you're exercising your right to remain silent.

@@MACROPARTICLE AND your RIGHT to counsel, that’s all they will hear from me.

@@MACROPARTICLE In the USA, the right to remain silent is a given. In the UK, silence is interpreted as an indication of guilt.

How may you remain silent, if you have that big fat license plate attached to the front and back of your car? You give me someone's license plate value, I'll tell you how much money is in their bank account.

This might be ASD, a lot of people are undiagnosed or might be ADHD.

seems nowadays its "guilty until proven innocent"........

Even middle school age. They should learn also about police stop, whether produce ID, give their name, consent to a search, etc. Whether to let Police in their car/home. All the things that BLM don’t teach, but should.

Have you ever wondered why LAW is NOT a school subject ? - just think what a mess the country would be in if it were - Sir Humphrey Appleby, Yes, Minister.

They don't want you to know. The Police are not our friends and you cannot talk your way out of being arrested and charged but you can most certainly can talk your way into prison, do not say anything other than your name.

Kenneth, you are quite wrong. In general, thanks in large part to social media, the public are now very aware that many many police officers fall far below the standards that we were brought up as children to expect police officers to uphold. You SHOULD watch the videos by CRIMEBODGE here on UKposts. NEVER talk to the police, they do not want to establish facts they want to twist them.

@@mobiusklein9140 Thank you for the wise words . makes me wonder why simple contract law. money management interest rates and police powers are not taught in schools so as to have a more informed and rational society . Thanks

Unfortunately some people can't afforded legal assistance £200 per hour some charge is the same with family law Charge for waiting time in court High phone call costs Legal aid is harder to obtain

@@mobiusklein9140 CRIMEBODGE is very informative

Unless of course you are in a jurisdiction where you commit an offence unless you state your name and address when required by police.

Most jurisdictions I've checked require you to identify yourself upon request *if the police suspect* you've committed a crime, even when there's not enough evidence for an arrest.

Never use a Duty Solicitor!

That's four,

@@philhode5104 well spotted are you a copper 😂

@@jackmason4374 no im far to honest and descent, would not trust them as far as I could throw them,had very bad dealings with them,they will do whatever it takes to climb that greasy pole,bottom line....they have to get convictions if not there bosses wl want to know why

@@philhode5104 , he wrote the same advice twice so it is still only three important things i suppose.

And why exactly do you need to tell them your name

@@freddyflint3889 In New Zealand if a Police officer asks your name you must tell them or face arrest.

yep. you got the right to shut-up, anytime you wanna.'

Do not ever accept a duty solicitor. They work in conjunction with the police and courts and do not want to get into their bad books!, also their fee is limited and they need to spend as little time on your case as possible.

This is correct, Both the Police and the Solicitor will be Freemasons, its a no win situation.

@@Brightstarlivesteam Correct they will also be Freemasons they work as a team.

@@shonniebhida ...dont talk wet, you don`t know a thing.

This comment and the idiotic ones in reply to it is both a lie and also very stupid.

They don't actually make much from legal aid. That's why most of them are useless. If you are rich and can afford a top lawyer, your chances are far better - guilty or not.

@@johnriggs4929 apply for legal aid , be slow returning any documents, tie the courts system up with their own red tape . By the time they can sort it all out as they are so slow your court case will be over .lol 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You got a problem with people being paid for their services, what is it you do for a living?

Nice one, and We shall see how much we can screw out of it

@@collincovid6950 - Do you have a problem with people being paid for their services?

Yes, and get them to put their questions in writing. They won't....

This has been done by design, I'm sure you know this. Add over-reaching offence laws to the poor not being able to afford legal aid and you have a pretty effective cash-cow.

Plead the 5th aswell 😅

IN February, in the High Court in Cardiff, (Neale v DPP (2021)) It was confirmed that you have a right to remain silent and not answer any question and that the police cannot arrest or charge you with wilful obstruction for not answering questions. Never accept the duty Solicitor and keep you lip firmly shut. If you say nothing then they have no evidence. The only part or the caution that is important is your right to remain silent. Do not speak to them at all! Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location.

@@benbuckley2540 - remaining silent is invoking the 5th amendment, cretin.

And, whatever you do, do not walk away from the police! 😀

@@caveatrotters3324 ask them if you're free to go

However if it’s a burglary, you get a crime number, shop lifting they are there in a flash. Get the shops to bring a private prosecution!

really robert? i myself am going through this farcity of godhood power myself i would go into more detail but you never ever know who is watching ie!! you know who i mean" wink wink, nudge nudge".... .... p.s., how did you get on m8??

Hopefully she stopped being a moron afterwards.

Yeah first someone drives in front of you spraying chemicals up your front and when your pupills are fixed you will be pulled over by the cops you truly don't know the way it works? C'mon Man

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/rICVhKGWmpl2lWQ.html

@@fuggoff5277 This video is about a police interview in the station not at the side of the road. My suggestions are to put them off their stride and divert the attention away from yourself. Not sure what you mean by chemical spray.

Have you tried that? The police officers I have dealt with would certainly make you pay for remarks like that, one way or another. These thugs are wearing the blue uniforms and that's all the edge they need to feel confident enough to use the upper hand as they see fit. The police force nowadays is populated by poorly educated, aggressive, even psychotic misfits who, by and large, are useless to the human race and have ended up in the police force because of that.

Bad idea to poke the police. Stay professional and respectfull

Like it.... make an appointment

Make an appointment and bill them for time

I'm not trying to be clever or facetious, but you are OFFERED a caution. If you don't accept it, the ball is back in their court & it would be up to them to either drop the matter or pursue you through more formal channels. The cautions are highly convenient for them & I am sure they play heavily on fear to get you to accept it. A good case in point showing why it is NOT a good idea, if at all possible, to engage with them, without having your solicitor right there with you.

There is your official criminal record, and something called the Nominal Record, which is never divulged by the police force. The Caution will stay on your nominal record, but will be "Spent" {removed from the official record) after 6 months if you are not arrested again. So if you apply for a job 7 months later and require a police check to get the job, your caution will not show up. Good luck.

@@mickymidnight1 You are correct but I was in a Distressed state, they asked me to sign a form about the Interview was taped correctly or something , I just signed and ready to go , then one of the police women said “ Do you know what you have signed , You just signed the caution sheet “ ! I then told them I want that form ripped up, the then told me we can’t do that .I got to IPC who sent me a Copy of the Tape Recoding Declaring My Innocence , Which I still have , up until this Morning I have always believed the Caution of some serious thing made up by is on my records , since 2006 and always worried if I went for a Job it will kick back at me ,

@@nhhdjdhdj6496 Thanks I ever knew that

Magistrates, are just as bad , they will believe a policeman, over you!

'Great white judgment'. Rev.20:11-15 (KJV) PLEASE read. PLEASE read PLEASE.

Thy are also old hands at cosying up to politicians. No senior copper gets done for kiddy-fiddling, just like their mates in Westminster.

@@wuffothewonderdog totally agree with you

Check out Alex Belfield's youtubes for agreement for this.

Net Tint Roller It's relevant now because the young new policeman sitting in on this 'interview' has this experience to draw upon. Sure there are guidelines, codes of practice and PACE, but that once young policeman is now coming up for retirement and remembers when all the red tape didn't get in the way of 'good old police tactics. And he's the one doing the manipulation today. There, I said it.

the same as being married lol

@Net Tint Roller Just the same as women can bring charges against some bloke 30 odd years down the line after a a random party with zero evidence.

@@josephberrie9550 Yeah, but a wife has a legal right to do your head in. It's called a marriage certificate.

Do mean England? Different countries in the UK have different police forces.

thats exactly what im going through at this exact moment in january 2022!!!!!!!! i swear on my beloved mothers grave, i will take it all the way............. fuking scum thats all they are..

where I live their quota is quite simple... - one felony arrest per week - five misdemeanor arrests per week - 10 traffic tickets per week. no. it is not a WRITTEN quota. yes. it is indeed a quota.

the police couldn't care less about 'proof.'

Arrested 5 times wanker

solicitors are the worst form of criminals

spot on

So Smallpiece, tell us what criminal convictions you have as clearly you do ..😂😂

@@Cymruohyd I was trained in the Russian military to handle American or British interrogation .

@@Cymruohyd Jumping to conclusions there much ??

The Police are not our friends and you cannot talk your way out of being arrested and charged but you can most certainly can talk your way into prison, do not say anything other than your name.

Here in the U.S.A., we have the right to remain silent during questioning. Guaranteed by the 5th Amendment of our Constitution. That means no consequences for refusing to talk.

THANK YOU John. It IS a prick of a world. The ONLY hope we do have is Jesus Christ. You/people may laugh or scoff. And you are free to do that. But the FACT is, he IS truth. (''Thy word is truth''. Jn.17:17 KJV) He is a rewarder of them that DILIGENTLY seek him. (Heb.11:6 KJV) IF (IF) you seek him, You can be saved. And if not, you (all) WILL PERISH. This is just the simple truth of the matter. Regards.