That's the only way they can change it in the shadows of their greed, their control is eventually detrimental to the whole system, simply because of the way the system is ran

BINGO Bill. It sure LOOKS that way. Intentional destruction. Were they moles?

@@dennisgannon Moles? More like Keystone Cops.

Everyone could see it but the pac and their fans...

Basic incompetence.

A conference that's been around for over 100 years is literally going away overnight. It's been hard to keep up with what's happening but the way Larry put it made me understand what's actually going on.

Not from PAC-12 territory so had no idea ESPN offerred to run the PAC-12 network for them and were turned down. Now I understand why they couldn't get a deal with Fox and ESPN.

You could tell part of him wanted to punch a hole in the screen, another part wanted to cry. Not quite the same as the rage me and my fellow Bruins fans felt last year, but certainly some similarities.

Once you got past the 90 seconds of preamble... I was seriously screaming: Let the man talk!

Ironic, seeing how the Big 12 changes partners like a squaredance. It wasn't that long ago Nebraska went to the Big 10 to whither in obscurity. Colorado went west, Mizzou southeast, Four Texas schools joined, then two departed soon after.

It all comes back to corrupt California leadership, lobbying and, especially, Nancy Pelosi.

Agreed

This does not make sense except everyone ran after the money.

Thought the same thing

Yes!! This!!

Yeah, I caught that. She’s concerned without having a clue.

@@billj8513One of life’s small pleasures is explaining football to a girl who’s just happy to be with you.

I lived in the Bay Area for half a decade (1986-1991) and I can say that Cal and Stanford athletics are fairly low on Bay Area sports fans' radar.

It’s all good now, they’re in a much better conference and I think the acc should join the big ten too. The only conferences thriving is the big ten and sec.

More than the Pac is dead, tradition itself is dead

@erikbartlam: couldn’t agree more. Not only is the PAC12 over after 100 plus years….but the B10 is also going to trash its own traditions going after the almighty dollar. Disgusting.

But how many teams is too much? With the additions of OR & WA Big 10 is now 18 !

@@webechubbinif you think this is good you’re naive. The sec should have never allowed oklahoma and texas to join.

Spot on. Texas A & M tried to warn Scott that Texas was going to form it’s own network and he didn’t listen.

@@David-si8vq They knew about the Texas Network. That was the deal breaker. Texas was unwilling to share their money from it, but wanted an equal cut of the Pac 10 (12) TV deal. That's Texas. We in the Big 12 have put up with their crap for years. They kept the conference alive, but at the same time, they took it over and got their way on everything. The consolation is that for all of their wealth, they couldn't translate it it to domination. They couldn't spend their way to championships. The Texas Network was the deal-breaker. The Pac 10 refused to budge and the deal fell through. My alma matter was going to get left out in the cold (Mountain West) because they were not invited to the Pac 10. Now Texas is gone and they are the SEC's problem. But instead of killing the Big 12, we got the best possible outcome: long term stability, lots of money, and no more Texas. But the Pac 10 learned: don't mess with Texas. If they let Texas have their way, they would have got Texas, A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State, along with Colorado. Utah would have been left out in the cold. The Pac 16 would be alive today and they would have the big TV deal. So as a fan of one of the have nots in the Big XII (even though we are the champs), I'm thankful for Pac 12 arrogance, greed, and ignorance. It saved my team. But that is the story Larry should have mentioned: that one decision -- to not let Texas have their way -- is why they are where they are today.

Woke Pac-12 leadership also passed multiple times on money cow BYU, estimated to be bringing close to $4M value for every other Big 12 team.

@@danielorr9910nothing about being woke.. BYU would be a nightmare for scheduling due to their No-Sunday policy.. Colorado and Utah are more attractive than BYU

Just slight clarification.. the deal was for the lot of six schools.. The conferences would have split with the Original Pac 8 and the Arizona schools joining the other 6 schools for a mountain division.. the Pac16 would have been amazing.. Larry Scott is an idiot

And overnight it will be gone.

Sadly, the future is megaconferences. The teams that jumped ship saw the writing on the wall.

@@bruhbruhhh6592The future is two megaconferences. The b12 will not sustain because none of their remaining schools have any sustained football success. The brands are subpar. Having 16 or more schools works when you have an Ohio State, Michigan, USC, Texas, Georgia, or Bama in the conference. Otherwise, you’d be just as overextended as the old 16-school WAC.

@@PCSPounder At that point, the feds get involved with anti-trust.

The whole time she kept interrupting, I'm yelling out loud (to nobody) "Who is this woman and why is she here, and why does she keep interrupting Larry Biel who knows his shit and she knows nothing about college sports?"

With the NIL, the college sports turned into a play for pay. The student-athlete era is over.

Nah. Nah to “RIP Pac-12.” Not “RIP Pac-12.” /

College has become semi professional. Terrible.@@jordanking6939

I’m a husky so it sucks

Tuff titty

Piss 12 conference

Utah always has a squad.

Yes! They have to stay competitive! Poor management at Pac-12 commissioner office.

Yes, this sucks for the Beavs and Cougs. The way out of this is tough but doable. Go to the MWC, kick the crap out of everybody, and wait for the inevitable (IMO) reorganization of FB and BB into a national format with a commissioner where the money isn't based on conference TV deals but National contracts with everyone getting a fair piece of the pie as long as they're competitive.

I feel for you man. Just gotta run whatever conference you end up in. I don't think the PAC 12 can survive because you'd need to add 4 members and the mwc as well as the AAC members have a pretty hefty exit fee so I doubt they'll pay that to join a very depleted PAC 12 with no tv deal. So your best bet is to lose the autonomy 5 status and merge with the mwc

Started with NIL and now with corporate greed.

@@rjwiechmanwhew.... the Copium is strong in you sir.

It's a good thing for the Big 12 that the PAC's Commissioner wasn't good at his job, because after OU and TX announced they were leaving, the B12 was on shaky ground. The PAC could have easily swooped up four teams like Kansas, Texas Tech ect.

@@deerobinson557seriously which makes this all more self inflicted. The Pac essentially merged with the Big 12 yesterday and they could have did this a year ago but their hubris told them that they were better than everybody and now the conference is dead

They were contractually obligated until now.

So… if you saw the writing on the wall with this, is it true this could happen to the ACC too?

@@deerobinson557 agreed. i would have bet bank that the big 12 and quite possibly the acc would have been the ones left outside in the rain.

If only the PAC12 commissioners had a fifth of his passion for the conference and the sport instead of just cashing checks and purchasing Apple & Tesla stock online.

Fellow Coug and neighbor here, well put. We all saw it coming. Over a decade now we haven’t been able to watch PAC-12 games and finally the sinking ship has sunk.

My brother is a Coug, sister a Husky, and I'm a Golden Bear. I think Wazzu may be more screwed than anyone, and I feel for you guys. Can the Governor step in? That's what happened in Virginia...

Husky alumni here, and it makes me sick that this is happening. I'm sure they'll schedule the Apple Cup still, but loses all meaning and removes the pleasure of ruining the other's season as we have seen in the past. I actually hope both Oregon State and Washington State will be allowed to join alongside Oregon and Washington. Gonna miss playing you filthy pussycats! (Said with love!)

Go Cougs forever, no matter what conference they end up in. May the spirit of Mike Leach guide the way.

let’s build a new conference.. go back to apple east to west with ecu, tulane, smu, usf, sdsu, fresno, csu, boise, osu, wsu, stanford, cal.. pairings: tulane/smu, usf/ecu, boise/wazzu, sdsu/csu, fresno/beavs, stanford/cal

Sameeee

Maybe we won’t have games going after midnight anymore. West coast has always dictated super late start times. Maybe we’ll actually see some of these games start earlier in the evening since it’s getting more ET/CT leaning.

Thank God the big ten network was created years ago, because if the bigger networks don't want to give the big 10 school a big contract they can carry coverage for their own games.

I feel bad that Harbaugh owned us two years in a row now, and will likely do so again this November! Day needs to get his head out of his and win the line of scrimmage! OSU is too soft under Day. Scoreboard. Makes me sick.

Facts!!! The Rose Bowl game isn't the same without the PAC and Big 10 playing each other. Plus conferences should be culturally made. Not made through vanity and greed.

Another bad fit

@@SS-fb7zd put it in the scrap book, because that's what that conference is about to be.

@@floridapmi sad but true I blame ESPN looked how they hyped the SEC when outside GA LSU Bama that league is no better than anybody else

@@SS-fb7zd True, as a Texas grad I wish they would have taken us in, that would have been a very strong conference that would have rivaled the SEC.

Exactly

Athletics brings importance to less prestigious universities. Stanford and Berkeley aren’t hurting for applicants. Of course, living in the Bay Area for a couple years some decades ago, even then the sports media barely had time for college athletics. And it’s not the media’s fault… the local sports media is following what’s popular. That’s the pros. I could blame the athletic departments for not having Oregon’s innovation, but that’s very hard to achieve.

The Big 12 schools knew this could happen and were proactive about it, starting with hiring a commissioner that came from the TV industry. The PAC 12 thought it could never happen to them.

@@bigbadjohn7053 Sounds about right. The pac’s leadership is directly at fault for its death.

Can't agree more. I also am a lifetime Sooner and Big 8/Big 12 fan. While a small and petty part of me cannot help but feel a little smug about how the narrative & tables have turned making the "flyover schools" of the Big 12 a savior for the three Pac 12 schools (Coach Prime and their previous connection to the Big 8/Big 12 makes Colorado a unique case), I genuinely feel terrible for the Pac 12 conference fans and the fans of TRADITIONAL college football throughout the country. Ultimately, though, in our capitalist, competition-driven society one truism cannot be ignored: Adapt or die.

That's fake news

@@khawmtiti4460 not at all. Pac 12 doesnt give a shit about football and hasnt for a while. Fresno St has better fans than a majority of Pac 12 schools

@@khawmtiti4460 someone (you) doesn't know wtf they're talking about...

​@@khawmtiti4460Fresno is 4-0 against UCLA in their own building over the last 20 years. They boat raced Washington State last year in the LA Bowl and beat Arizona State in the Las Vegas Bowl back in 2018.

​@@josephagundez5336so

I think the four schools remaining in the pac-12 well most certainly have to join the Mountain West

Thats not a given because the ACC is in the same trouble the PAC-12 is in and the Big 10 and Big 12 is looking to poach schools like UNC, Duke, Clemson, Virginia, Florida State, Miami, etc.

Sadly, while the Big 10 may have an eye on Cal and Stanford at some point, I don’t think the Big 12 is interested in the Beavs or the Cougs. The best hope for the PAC-4 is a merger of some sort with the Mountain West. 😢🏈

Oregon fan and I’m pissed, feel terrible for rest of conference

@@devinchi3744you should be. Im sure you guys will be pumped for away at penn state, maryland, rutgers. The logistics dont even make sense.

I agree. While I'm a big ten fan and a michigan fan, the likes of any team out west joining the conference makes absolutely no sense at all except for a money perspective. That's all that's going on in college football right now. I wasn't a fan when Nebraska joined, and really hated the additions of Maryland and Rutgers. Watching a michigan away game at Rutgers or Maryland is extremely boring. What's going to happen is we will have 2 major conferences(sec and big10) and then a bunch of nobodies and then the little guys like Mac conf and sun belt at the bottom. Florida, Miami, notre dame, clemson will all have to figure out whether the sec or big 10 is their home. Then the rest will just be banding together for 2nd rate conferences.

@@jcelldogsright. It’s so dumb they should just have 1 conference atp and split the $ over all D1 schools.

Im gonna miss watching Asu play Oregon and the California schools… those were always great games to watch

Feel bad for Oregon St. they are on the come up and just got done renovating half their stadium - lady went their so they were my Pac12 team As a Big10 guy and Mich fan. I love the additions. Just need ND to wake up and NC to get out of the ACC prenup somehow

Well, Stanford and Cal can now move to the Ivy League!…and beat up on Harvard and Yale!

@@blucaptain ND isnt in the Big 10 bc of Mich. When Mich apologizes for Yosyt being a Nazi...we'll join Not one moment sooner.

@@dr.lawrencel.bradford9762 can't see the Ivy League turning into a National Conference with the funding they have in athletics

​@@dr.lawrencel.bradford9762they'd have to revoke the scholarships of every athlete they have in all sports to join the ivy League but it is likely the move the university makes. I mean it is what is best for the university as a whole sadly because without the PAC they won't get as much endowment money as they used to but they could up that by a lot by joining the ivy league. Oregon State and Washington State will have to face extreme budget cuts both for athletics and academics and join the mwc. It really is sad

The reference to Wilcox as the "Cal State" coach is more a reflection of an ignorant journalist than a diminishing prominence of Cal as a university. But point taken that some sports fans will start confusing Cal to other schools as Cal sports become less prominent.

Came here to say the same thing. As a Big 10 alum, I personally don’t want to see Stanford and Cal in our conference. The Bay Area doesn’t care about athletics which is fine but most schools in the Big 10 care deeply (minus Rutgers and Maryland).

Was it right after that when he said they don't care and then expanded on his point saying they're great academic schools but football is just not their thing. Is the lady American? I'm asking because I'm an international fan and to many of us Cal and Cal State or Michigan and Michigan State sound like the same university. I don't even know if Cal State exists to be honest. I could always look it up, and so could the lady have looked it up before she had this conversation. I follow a non-revenue Olympic sport btw.

@@dronesclubhighjinks There are 2 public university systems in California - University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU). UC schools are research universities (eg. UC Berkeley, UCLA) and CSU schools are historically teaching universities (eg. SDSU, CSULB). UC snobs do not like to be associated with CSU. One of the reasons why UCB (it’s Board of Regents) doesn’t want to be in the same conference as Fresno State and San Diego State. So a Bay Area newscaster to not know to never call Berkeley a Cal State school is 😂

@@DailyRants89 So no ratings, no pay, huh? This is supposed to be college athletics, where we teach sportsmanship, team play, courage, preparation and perseverance on a level playing field, athletics being an adjunct activity to the educational mission of the schools. Hell, the NFL, NBA and MLB all share TV revenues equally among all teams and they're strictly a for-profit enterprise. How is this acceptable for college sports?

@@dronesclubhighjinks Many universities have a state university (University of name of state) and also what started off as an agriculture, land grant school (state name State). For example, Texas has the University of Texas in Austin and Texas Agricultural and Mechanical College (later university) or Texas A&M in College Station. UT was for the lawyers, businessmen, doctors, petroleum engineers, liberal arts majors; A&M was for those going into agriculture, forestry, mechanical and civil engineering, veterinary medicine. Both have expanded their offerings, but those were their original foci. But it doesn't matter, usual one (e.g. Arkansas, Missouri, Washington, Oregon, Utah, Arizona) or the other (Penn State, Ohio State, Louisiana State) ends up being the power in sports in the state. The rivalries can border on hatred.

Looking forward to Texas A&M and Texas playing every year. Don't follow either one of them but when they start playing each other again will start. Aggie stadium and although in crappy Austin, Texas will fill it up too.

My thought exactly! Over here at the MWC we still have a conference, so who's the "lesser" now?! Hopefully the shit doesn't keep rolling down hill. When things like this kick off my school (Utah State) usually gets caught on the outside looking in. Glad we have a good buyout agreement as that might keep us from imploding as well. I can envision a scenario where many of our "bigger" market schools in the MWC, band together and leave to form a new conference or a reformed PAC conference with the PAC leftovers and maybe others from the American. That seems unlikely right now given the high buyout to get out of the MWC, plus they wouldn't get much money for a TV deal as the PAC has already proven. If the PAC leftovers want to join the MWC I am sure we will welcome them with open arms but I would rather it is only Oregon State and Washington State as those seem to be a better fit for our league. Stanford and Cal would likely go it alone as independents and hope for a decent invite down the road, or form that mash up conference from the MWC and AAC once our grant of rights deal expires. They aren't going to get anywhere near the money they are used to but it would be better than joining the MWC. Stanford would do alright but Cal would struggle. Who knows, maybe the B12 will reconsider and throw them a lifeline but the elitist attitudes of those institutions coupled with the fan apathy make it so no conference wants to touch them. I just know that this whole thing isn't over because when there is ripple in the power conferences it becomes a tsunami through the G5, and this is way more than a ripple. The MWC grant of rights deal and lack of good TV money may be what is delaying the second half of the wave for now, but I hope I am wrong there.

I think he meant "lesser" as in P5 vs G5, as it stands Pac is still a P5... might not be a bad idea for MWC to join the 4 schools left in the PAC, so the PAC keeps its P5 status and all of a sudden all the schools in the MWC become P5s. They probably could just change the name to Pacific-Mountain West Conference.

@@biglan16 My estimation is that there is a chance that the PAC leftovers and the MWC merge, but there is very little chance that any of the other conferences would recognize it as a P5. None of that may matter anyway under the new playoff system. Although I am sure they will find a way to screw over the little guys in however many conference champs get an automatic berth. We'll see how any merger takes place but whatever way it does the MWC should ensure that all of its members get in on the deal.

OMG you mean Cal will be in the same conference as Fresno State and SDSU? To be in association with a CSU? The horror! Board of Regents must have to take out their smelling salts.

Oregon State and WSU are relegated to the Mt. West or WAC and I’m sorry 🥺😢 Stanford and Cal might need to see where other teams align…might need to go independent for a few years until spots open.

Because of UCLA basketball like 40 years ago

@@commonsense3921 every sport my guy, but whatever, it’s a good move for these schools

@@commonsense3921PAC 12 literally 5 championships last year 🤦🏽‍♂️

@@IEUNITED1906And if we watched more of those sports on P12N, if the ratings grew tenfold, that might have mattered. Football is 85% of the income. Basketball (both sexes if I understand correctly) is close to 15%. The compensation for winning at water polo, golf, tennis, and sailing isn’t much, unfortunately.

Aren’t the vast majority of them contributed by UCLA, USC and Stanford?

Are you serious. You should rethink that. Everywhere you named except BYU are major cities and not college towns. They’ve always had more to offer but the perception of most schools made it appear they were better programs and colleges. Houston, TCU, Cincinnati and UCF can recruit their own city and field a Competitive D1 team. Can Cal, Oregon State, Stanford and Washington State do the same? Top recruits and top TV markets.

​@@lecurymccray5804well cal and Stanford could do that theoretically but they get hard out recruited by everyone. Even Oklahoma was recruiting better California players than them

@@lecurymccray5804Washington state has no incentives. Pullman is in the middle of nowhere and hour drive outside Spokane. This is why Eastern Washington University football and Gonzaga are far more successful than WSU. They are actually near the population that wants to watch. WSU has been doomed for a long long time.

TCU has had more Top 10 finishes in football than all 4 of those PAC schools combined in the last 20 years.

Don’t forget that USC got ZERO support from the conference and the PAC schools. They didn’t think to back up and protect their biggest brand.

Bogus? Bahahaha BS

@@lylecampbell9036Yes bogus. Maybe do some research on what happened before making stupid comments. Seriously.

It's funny how they are bogus when against your school, but if another school is sanctioned its because they cheat.

Furd already rejected that, seeing the Big 12 as not meeting a high enough level academically. Absent a Big Ten invite in the next few years, they are likely to be an Independent.

Honestly, OSU and WSU would be better fits for the Big12. Yes, their alumni bases are smaller than the Bay Area schools, but their fan base is more rabid (believe me, I lived in the Bay Area and not many people there cared about college athletics). Large portions of the WSU & OSU alumni base live in Seattle (no. 12 TV market) and Portland (no. 22 TV market) so there would be lots of eyes in those markets watching Big12 sports that probably don't now.

Do you realize how much money these schools make from athletics just alone?? This will never happen from a financial standpoint.

Jim Plunkett, John Elway,

With NIL today, I doubt the Elways and Plunketts would go to Stanford. Also most athletics programs barely breaks even or makes a loss annually anyways.

You’re absolutely right. At least Uof Chicago understood who they are. Really kind of an interesting story

@@willmckee7123 Really not that much compared to Stanford's $38 billion endowment.

That is right....since, Chicago was an original member of the Big 10.

Spot on, but the MWC would grab up OSU and WSU in a flash, only thing that would stop that is if they couldn't swallow their pride and want to join. Cal and Stanford can follow the BYU model and go independent in Football and WCC in everything else. Kind of ironic that BYU has shown them the path if you ask me. Not shedding any tears for Cal or Stanford as they are a big part of why the PAC ended up as it did, but I do feel bad for OSU and to a lessor degree WSU.

@@Josh1888USU Neither Stanford or Cal would be successful as independents. They were already cutting sports as Power5 schools and their TV money would greatly diminish as independents. BYU saw the folly of being independent and quickly jumped at the Big12 offer to join when they were given some leeway on the Sundays issue.

The thing about going independent though is that your school needs to have a strong following such as those at ND and BYU. I believe Stanford and Cal becoming independent over the years would result in similar product to UConn or UMass. Stanford and Cal alum and students treat athletics as a gimmick and the Bay Area does not have casual college fans. Minimal people watching on tv and going to games for most of them is hanging out while a game is going on. Gotta hope the Big10 comes knocking otherwise the move would be to just join the MWC. But as Larry said, it doesn’t have to be about sports. They are academic institutions first.

@@earreola48 ultimately, I think both Stanford and Cal are comfortable in becoming like UMass and UConn

@@user-fm6wd8xy2o I agree, they probably wouldn't be successful as an independent. However, and just like BYU, it may just be the best option they have in the short term. Additionally, their elitism, hubris, and fan apathy are a poison pill for any conference that they are in. So there is a chance that the MWC doesn't want them and even if they did, any money they would get wouldn't pay their bills right now. Going independent would likely net them more money just because of the brands they are sitting on.

GO BUCKEYES!!!!!!!!!!!

WDE GOODBYE Larry Scott wish you've NEVER would've replaced the Retired Tom Hansen

@@rowdyjr2318 I agree. The Colorado administration definitely were going for a splashy big name hire to make them more appealing than just on Saturdays in the fall. Take away Coach Prime, and Colorado is just as irrelevant as Oregon St. and Washington St.. They don't even have a notable basketball program to lean on. But I believe the biggest factor in the Buffaloes coming back to the Big 12 is history and geography. Colorado spent the majority of its history with the Big 12 and its predecessors before 2011. Deion's hire was just a very good supporting reason IMO.

What about Pelosi and the SF homeless epidemic? Pelosi.

What's crazy is I heard the Big 10 is considering playing Olympic sports in hub locations like Phoenix and Columbus. This will cut down on travel costs.

Why does it have to be a road trip?

@@MrRicklynch57Would help out a lot.

They have this invention called the airplane. It reduces the time of travel significantly. You may want to look it up. You're also talking about 1 game (and I doubt it will be every year) to go from Washington/Oregon/etc to Rutgers. More than likely there will be, at a minimum, an East division and a West division and probably the only time an E/W team would play would be for the championship and it'll probably be at some neutral site closer to the middle. So stop being overly dramatic. And your comment abut student-athletes being the big losers, you're joking, right? If I was a student-athlete, I would love the opportunity to see other parts of the country. The program is paying for trips, not you, so you get to experience life more vs being in the same region for 3-4 years.. Please.. And yes, it is greed, but either you adapt with the times or you don't. The mismanagement of the Pac-12 was horrible. Hell, they could have paid me half the salary they paid those commissioners and I could have run the conference into the ground just as effectively.

@@DennisCoffman-dd8ok how dare you make sense and pop his rage balloon. you should be ashamed. let the man whine in peace.

The Bay Area is Trash, no one in that TV market cares about College Sports... So screw Em.

Seeing some team join the MW would be interesting, they will have to slug it out with Boise, SDSU, and FRESNO !

Alabama? I always said they admit guys in the deep south that cannot be admitted in pac12 acc big10

Jim Phillips too..Sleeper agent

@@matty9447 Big 12 hired a non-football guy. That's working out fine.

Not even Cal and Stanford...... OSU is 3-3 and WSU is 4-3 vs the MWC over the last 5 years.

Let's start with the fact that most universities first objective is to be academic degree granting institutions. Secondly clearly you don't care. You're not the student-athletes having to travel all over the country now to provide entertainment. At this point we really need to take the student part out of the word student-athlete. These are young professionals who are providing entertainment and I do believe they should be paid & fully compensated for their services. NIL was the right way to go.

It doesn’t matter anyways y’all are gonna be at the bottom

@@krumbleme2 The football players won't have a problem. They will be flying by private airplanes. The rest of the sports, however... As far as the most universities first objective to be degree granting institutions, that is long gone. They're businesses regardless of their "non-profit" status, especially state schools.

@krumbleme2 The average cost of tuition to attend USC is $60000 a year. I'm sure most of these student-athletes are willing to travel across the country to play a sport thats giving them the opportunity to attend that university on a sports scholarship. Forgive me, but lets keep it real, academics took a backseat the day college sports began being televised.

Man please

Rose Bowl? Unless it’s the national championship game it will be the #2 B10 vs probably the #2 XII. It’s the powerhouse game. The SEC has the Sugar and ACC has Orange. It will remain the B10 game…and a more at large opponent. But the Fiesta bowl isn’t as important so….

@@michaeloptv yeah but the Orange Bowl can just be filled by a second rate aCC team as whoever is affiliated with it for the other conferences

As a B1G fan, I only want schools that are serious about BOTH academics and athletics. Cal isn’t that team. Not Stanford.

@D.Wagner2 success in sports is cyclical. Obviously success isn't even as some universities prioritize athletics more. It's a lot more likely for Stanford or California to be successful on the field than Oregon successful in the classroom.

@@talon310calif More arrogance. Typical of Spoiled Children fans.

@Taylors_Tunes how is it arrogance wanting cal and Stanford over NW schools? USC has a long history against those schools. I also actually care about academics. Washington is a top 50 school but Oregon doesn't even crack the top 100

I wouldn’t say losing your best two programs to the sec (and thats after A&M left years ago)

@@dpd2k105 As a Longhorn fan, I can't say UT was one of the "best" programs at least for 14 years. Name? Yes. But the Big XII will be fine. TCU made the CFB finals. The Pac12 lost USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington through hubris.

Not really, the Big 12 still lost it's two most powerful brands.