As Garfield would say...

Fear gets clicks

@@bngr_bngr Nuclear weapon usage is limited by treaty and would certainly cause the UN and NATO to respond. The UN would definitely respond just due to how much this would increase tensions. NATO may intervene based on whether or not the nuclear debris affects nation members.

HERE is The TRUE Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

@@oli3492 we are dealing with a country that doesn’t care about treaty’s.

This aircraft does not need stealth and speed, the X-102 missiles with which it is equipped have a range of 3800 miles, it is enough for it to be outside the air defense and enemy aircraft coverage!

Well, it is a turboprop, so there's a jet in there, but yeah, that was a little lame

@@user-dr5li1xl6i Lol, we've all got that man. Next...

lol

A turboprop is a jet- with a propeller as the thrust generator. A ‘jet’ has a turbofan as the thrust generator.

They are left out plus space Force and strategic force outside mainland like India Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Syria Iran Ethiopia North Korea Venezuela Vietnam Cuba Serbia Belarus may be in china never mess with Russia when it's nuclear power and cyper space and Artaficial intelligence.

They got a TINY mention, but it was literally like 2 words in a large string.

I'm sorry, did you seriously think the US was capable of making intelligent responses?

Ukr already attacked russia

American is not afraid we ready tired of the threats

@@fredricksmith9543 if you are not afraid you should be. Cause Russia can make entire U.S. and North America a wasteland.

yes

The world needs it. But it does not deserve it.

Sort of like the latest Top Gun Movie?

@@doctordilanka They would have to use the undetectable and invincible B-2 Stealth Bomber from the United States Air Force for a preemptive strike against the Russian nuclear weapons storage facilities because a US Navy FA-18 hornets and F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter jets do not have a long enough range to fly that far inside the Russian Federation and the F-14 Tomcat also does not have a long enough range and the F-14 Tomcat is retired and is no longer used by the US Navy. The B-2 stealth bomber can use in-flight refueling to refuel itself in the air to fly all the way around the world and back.

@@224dot0dot0dot10 look at the map of russia. Its fkin HUGE LOL. U really think USA could hit every single base/ nuke storage site without retaliation? LOL

I agree with you which is why we shouldn’t stoop to their level and engage in a nuclear slugfest if they drop a tactical nuke by any chance we must exile them from society and any other countries who are allies through probably a lot of sanctions or something obviously russsia does not want to lose against Ukraine I believe Vladimir Putin has something called ID and ego I read that in college

@@Paul11 yes 21 stealth bombers with stand off weapons. Annexation is not ok and nukes being used for it unreasonable. Preemptive strike would be smart move once they get my hen on truckd or when loading them better then wait and so nothing .losers non body like s

SPREAD the FEAR..

Good catch 😉

That's an interesting perspective, thank, Blc. I would have never known myself.

how much more powerful

Technical realities about guns, explosives, anything of that nature, elude journalists. How can we trust their journalistic integrity regarding tactics or strategy?

There's talk of Russia considering limited nuclear attack and hope the other side backs down from responding. In that case, then the concept of mutual assured destruction failed to deter any nuclear strike.

Good I’m waiting fed up of this world

@@RiDankulous no one else would use a nuke if Russia used 1 in Ukraine everyone would scream and shout but that's it there will be no military response Because of fear of being the next target

@@vaskodimoski5690 🤣

@@RiDankulous The deterrence is against Russia attacking US or a NATO country with nuclear weapons not a third party without their own nuclear weapons like Ukraine. MAD doesn't apply here.

Yet they are not seeing the greater picture here: Russians don't care about effectiveness. They are utterly incompetent and corrupt, as demonstrated by the terrible losses inflicted to their army. I have a strong belief they want to spread fear with these nuclear weapons. They want to strike whatever city they can and inflict fear in the population and in Kyiv, making people wonder what will be next. This man is completely mad and if there is something that I learned about WWII is that madmen will do whatever they can to achieve victory.

Only use case that has any meaning would be hitting some big damns along the Dniper to flood vast areas and force Ukraine to send military to help out the with the evacuation. Or they could slam a couple of dosen missiles into the dams.

@Horros Yugos I doubt they would be alone comrade.

The most effective use of tactical nukes would be to cause a disaster in west Ukraine around somewhere like Lviv which would draw Ukranian forces there to help the people affected.

But will you survive? What's your analysis on that ?

It was more so half on half saying Puting would or would not invade

The sites have been here since the cold war...

The sites have been there for a long time

It was clear it wasn't a bluff, but leftists in the media convinced themselves it wouldn't happen.

Putin even said: paranoia

america did.

@@jonathanodude6660 The Allies did. Imperial Japan said it would continue to attack the Allies and kill every last Japanese if need be.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver japan said it would kill the japanese? also, america dropped the bombs.

@@jonathanodude6660 Yes, Imperial Japan said it would attack, fight, and repel any invasion until the last Japanese was dead. Imperial Japan started that war, too. The Pacific War was an Allied effort against Imperial Japan's acts of war.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver right right. didnt know the first bit. i do know they came as far as australia in their antics. that surprised me when i heard it. it isnt really surprising that after studying the japanese attitude, the americans thought the only way forward is to release unheard of, devastating destruction on a civilisational scale on them. it doesnt mean they didnt drop a single bomb (at a time) on them, which is what the OP said no one would do. in fact, no one has done anything other than that. i highly doubt wed see hundreds of nukes deployed at once on territory russia wants to control. if those nukes hit NATO, WWIII will result in the end of putin. its just super unlikely well see anything more than a single tiny nuke that barely has any long term effects, solely designed to make ukraine cower in fear.

While the difference in music would be a giveaway, girl’s jeans today do remind me of 1985 fashion; high-waist, tapered fit, no ‘90s acid wash.

Well peace out I guess, I don't exist.

You just perfectly described Joe Biden.

Replace ukraine with russia and you have the ACTUAL translation...not interpretation.

Includes the newly annexed eastern ukrainian territory.

That’s wild cause defending Ukraine is part of the US agreement with Russia signed after the dissolution. Russia literally agreed to that. That’s why Russia has so many of the things. The US convinced Ukraine to give them to Russia in exchange for territorial security promises. Russia literally signed off on the UK and the US both securing Ukraine.

@@Freshbott2 suprised the UN doesn't know about this

Shows you how scared he is of nato, Always talking high and mighty, little ape.

I’m fat so I’m dead if WW3 starts

better get ready because apparently the psychopaths in charge are hellbent on blowing up humanity...fun times. Thanks, Biden voters!

@@newares8140 I thought about that and people who are fat, if they are in a bunker, might last longer without food so you have a benefit. I have about 4 weeks before I go since I'm a lower weight but you could last for months. It won't happen though so don't worry. These leaders and their gangs don't want their empires to crumble; they have nothing after nuclear war.

@@RiDankulous thank you for excusing myself to the nutritionist 🤣

I am

Nope . It’s not actually. It’s all fear mongering propaganda

That’s not the question. The right one would be “Is USA willing to take nuclear blackmail? If USA pledge to defend you and it doesn’t hold the end of the bargain with another country, how will this affect USA influence in the world? How much is USA willing to lose by backing out of war?

I think it goes Way Beyond NATO.

HERE is The TRUE Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

@@Praise___YaH 😂

@@newares8140 let me remind you that Ukraine is not part of nato so what contract are they pledged to?

Did someone say oil????

Wow, I never knew that.

Wrong. Look up Semipalatinsk, which was nuked around 450 times so that the USSR and the US could study the effects of radiation.

Point being…..?

​@@gregmonksin an armed conflict. There were nukes exploding in Nevada also, in Australia, in Sahara desert...

USA unfortunately set the presidante

@@slabdab4202 to end a war, not to create one

if Russia used a nuke, it would most likely be a tactical nuke. Poseidons would just guarantee the end of history

SPREAD the FEAR..

only if you cant track these subs, and we are!

Complete myth ... it could never cause such a tsunami that the Russians claim, they need a physics lesson !

Assume that it would only be tactical weapon's. His hatred for Nato seems more concerning, especially since they can't locate the Russian Nuclear sub that submerged two weeks ago. It could be anywhere in the world right now. Everyone needs to turn to God and pray for world peace.

Do you want to bet the future of humanity on that?

Actually you're partially wrong on that, the ammunition itself is mostly viable and durable, the launch infrastructures however, aren't. Also, russians aren't dumb, with their limited budget they make sure to stay the world's number one in nuclear warheads. If there's one thing they won't jeopardize letting rot, it's those nuclear weapons

Tf yall talking about? There’s been some cases of malfunctioning, but mostly all of the equipment and ammo and rockets are completely fine. So you better don’t underestimate such thing as nukes, that have more care and attention, than regular conventional weapons.

U.S. cooks up this story about getting rid of Saddam because he was dangerous and had dangerous weapons. Yet here goes Vlad Putin walking around with his chest poked out, wrestling bears and the U.S. sends in Ukraine. If it wasn't so dangerous, it might be funny.

You just showed me how foolish you can be if you have a say on this war. You forget that underestimating your enemy's will help your downfall

He would only launch a strike against Ukraine. He is not bombing the rest of the world. The US would have no justification to launch a counter attack.

He shouldn’t be underestimated, any wrong move would be catastrophic

Because he's aware of NATO's threat beyond Ukraine. He will use nukes before Russia's military gets depleted, not after.

HERE is The TRUE Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

SPREAD the FEAR..

Yep. Its just propaganda.

Because those weapons, which aren't fielded yet, have no strategic value.

"They have the most advanced torpedoes and autonomous minsubs" Yea most advanced according to who? Oh according to Russia itself? Yea they only tell the truth about anything so they must be the most advanced. Just like the t-14 and SU-57 they're so advanced you can't even see them.

@@Merugaf according to western media. They've been hyping the doomsday tsar bomba's destructive force, su57's dogfight maneuvers, etc...waaay before they 🇺🇦 war

@@Tagnalpik trashmedia parroting RT bullshiy interviews isn't western media

"EU calculations" good one! a billion a month from US taxpayers, and they dont even hold crimea. Be afraid to see what losing looks like...

Russian troops don't have matching clothes. They are running out of weapons and ammo and need to beg Iran for more. Ha! IRAN!

@@liljoe31 USA stands to gain more billions from any billion they spend in Ukraine, military equipment orders from EU is at all time high, plus natural gas shipments etc…

Banderistan

i dont think so....you have every media personality from Tim Pool to Neil DeGasse Tyson and General Petraues saying nuclear war is no big whoop. they are going to do this

They can sneak some bombs around. It doesn't matter in this case because they want to show they are getting ready and for Nato to see so Nato exerts pressure on Ukraine to stop an advance, or negotiate for peace. It wouldn't work. There would be no capitulation.

They don't need to they have submarines

There are no defenses to nuclear missiles.

Sure it is. Turboprop classifies as a jet engine.

@@blcjck8121 Oh interesting -- if true, I've learned something new! It does look like you're correct, in my brief review of Wikipedia -- main difference with what most people consider a jet engine is just the appearance, in that the prop that is exposed in the video is enclosed in a cowl in a "true" jet engine. There are certainly many other differences (the enclosure of "true" jets force all the air into the compressor and combustion, where as exposed props do not), but the fundamental concept is absolutely close enough to qualify as a jet, for the most part

except that the army of the Russian Federation is incapable of working in a nuclear environment.

Uncomfortably high

Western propaganda…Ukraine planning false flag attack

@Stormtrooper What could you expect of random CoD veterans on the Internet. Actual US military ground troops would never underestimate their enemies like these idiots.

@Stormtrooper Globalist who took over the Ukraine gov are the real aggressors Russia is doing what is right

Very high. Russia is having difficulty fielding post 2000s weaponry effectively to push a man-power starved offensive. But nukes are 50s tech. You don’t need precision guidance. You don’t need air superiority, communications, massive logistical effort. It’s a strategic weapon they have. They have tested them. They work just like their old Soviet weaponry works.

Give it time soon

Who's Pete???

Nobody owes you an explanation

World War two, ** the battle that could have kicked off world war three in 1944, would have been over Crimea, more over the piece of land that controls the flow of ships in and out of Europe for hundreds of years. The piece of land obama so willingly Gave over to Russia during his term.

@Daniel Springer move to saint Petersburg, Danny..

Assuming the ones in the sham referendum? Or actual Russia?

oohh like Hawaii

For starters, nobody knew anything about nuclear weapons back then & on top of that, nobody even knew about the bombs other than the pilots of the planes that dropped them. Secondly the nukes were dropped as a very last resort against an enemy that would never have surrendered otherwise and the only way to defeat them would have been a full scaled invasion which would have cost both sides millions of lives. Thirdly your grammar is diabolical.

America nuking Japan meant ending the war and not getting killed. For a Russian launching a nuke, it's the exact opposite. How are you this dumb?

Impossible, everything that enters and exits it can be seen

Because our media agencies provide American propaganda.

I hope they send you and your family in the front line... Sorry to be so cruel with my words but once you write in youtube videos you most expect back a comment....

@@letizianunes1169 don’t be sorry. It’s time for the end. Embrace it.

😁

She always sounds like that

You know this will lead to the end of world?

The metaphor you suggest is this one: Suppose Mike Tyson and Leon Spinks are in a boxing match and Tyson is losing badly. Now suppose Spinks' coach keeps trying to hand him a .357 magnum since "this way you'll win for sure!"

@@robertmaybeth3434 Shakes head in confusion… No, incorrect there's too much distortion making your metaphor faulty and almost entirely inaccurate. Allow me to tweak this boxing metaphor: I’ll remove the boxes names, for this serves little if any purpose… You have the heavyweight champion of the world. And you have a spoiled 90 pound weakling threatening the world, and pushing everybody around… for decades. This spoiled 90 pound weakling pretends to be a heavyweight champion of the world, yet nobody believes this to be the case. Although the world does remember his Overweight father was once a very capable fighter. The heavyweight champion of the world won’t fight this loudmouth, so the loudmouth becomes increasingly demanding, and troublesome. While nobody wants to see the hospitalisation of the loudmouth, something needs to be done. a)The heavyweight champion of the world steps on the toes of the loudmouth and quietly reminds the loudmouth that things are going to change. or b)The heavyweight champion of the world shrugs and allows the loudmouth to continue his unacceptable and offensive behaviour. Possibly encouraging further escalation, and definitely encouraging further unacceptable and offensive behaviour.

@@robertmaybeth3434 Your metaphor .357 magnum = nuclear strike At literally no point have I suggested the US or any Western power make a nuclear strike. I will add though it is beyond reasoning to state categorically that you will not do this when the possibility of a nuclear strike is being suggested by your enemy. This is not how deterrence functions, and is primarily the reason the world now has an overconfident Russia, a Russia who freely threatens the world with nuclear weapons on an almost weekly basis.

Then why didn't the rest of the world react to the US when it invaded Iraq on false pretenses in 2003?

Didn't the U.S. just spend the last 20 years dropping bombs on civilians in the Middle East? I think Putin just minded his own business during all of that. Maybe we should return the favor.

Not necessarily. If Russia were to fall, I'd wager that China has already thought that through and would love it some former CIS territories.

A good amount of that land is inhabitable.

China is the only one said it would not strike first with nuclear weapon unless if it was strike first. Russia on the other end said it would assume incoming missile was nuclear and would respond accordingly

China is also a target in any nuclear war with Russia. So they will se their nukes against the west. Just to be sure that west doesn’t nuke them back 😂

Either way I would not want to find out😅😅

Welcome mate! To the new Russia in ukraine. Only rubles please 🥰

SPREAD the FEAR..

Ignorance is bliss.

Your ancestors were flying kites when the sputnik appeared in space. Bip,bip🤣

@@PJ-yp3vb I used to be maintenance crew of US Air Force Titan II. ICBM. Do I know anything more than you do?

@@robertmaybeth3434 in your opinion is it highly likely that many of their icbm’s are non functional & would that be a difficult thing fir them to remedy?

Yeah and that’s correct

Because it is

@@TheZachary86 In Putin's desperate mind, maybe.

@@TheZachary86 i claim your house, i just need to station some troops there

Facts are pesky things

They'd need a bigger map.

Mother Russia has a place for you at the front, bring you own sleeping bag, it can be used as a body bag for your trip home.

@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 if a nuclear war starts it first start with Ukraine and it will also destroy Ukraine before the outside world its loss loss on both sides the difference is that one said has more kills in it and at that time you won't need your body to be sent back home since there is nobody left to Bury you so🤫

If Russia wins in Ukraine they will attack Nato territory next and then we WILL have world war 3. The only way to prevent a nuclear war is for russia to lose.

@@universeisundernoobligatio3283 and the Ukrainians are waiting for you

@@Allen-qn3vj Well far more interesting working on the HIMAR navigation R&D team improving the accuracy

Because it is now incorporated into Russia. You might not like it, I definitely don’t like it, but these are the facts in the ground. Not everything is a propaganda piece. Not everything is a conspiracy

@@blairbrownie1223 It's not. Unless it's accepted internatinally it's just a stolen property that doesn't belong to the thug regardless of what kind of wet dreams he has. WSJ shouldn't state that it's a part of russia in its graphics.

Stop your war mongering mind

Just because the US doesn't admit it's Russian territory doesn't mean it's not. The people there consider themselves Russian.

pretty sure they had a referendum and voted to join Russia. DOnbas is mostly inhabited by Russian people. Sorry about posting real facts, my bad! Go Joe! Bomb them Russkies straight to Siberia! Yee hawww