Great video indeed, hello from Singapore

He’s tryna steal your audience bro😂😂

My man well said

Great video indeed, hello from Africa

Great comment Arun I agree the tech companies should be more up-front because they clearly try to confuse the customer.

Definitely

yes how impressive of a reviewer to "remain independent" lol

When he said "look at what else was in the presentation" and showed a still with the Tesla Semitruck, I'm surprised he didn't call that out tbh, the Semi also had a similar delivery schedule and failed to deliver, a bit more significant for something advertised to "beat rail" on cost. Or full self driving. Or robotaxis. He literally picked the smallest thing that is of no real importance to anyone to critique about tesla, the one foot of rollout standard.

He was INTERVIEWING not “hanging out”. It’s his job

Ya, it's really a low bar to ask a tech reviewer to be independent.

The Roadster scam runs deeper. Instead of paying for traditional advertising, Tesla created a "referral program" where they offered 60 influencers (bloggers and UKpostsrs) free Roadsters in exchange for shilling the Tesla brand (according to Electrek). Those people made videos and blog posts expecting a free car for their efforts, but got nothing (other than ruining their integrity by shilling for a brand). That would have been a lot of advertising for $15million, but Tesla got it for free because they're not producing the Roadster (they haven't even offered the Plaid as an alternative).

@@Buggabones getting that refund is quite an operation - and those cars are never coming out

@@jonnowocky8179 Yes they are coming out.

@@dmitribovski1292 citation needed. And no, bro trust me doesn't cut it as a citation

@@DamianMarx What are the cars that were announced and have deposits but aren't yet delivering? It was the Semi, the Cybertruck, and the Roadster. The semi delivery event was 2 weeks ago and those are currently going out to customers. Cybertruck has begun early production (there are photos). So you can clearly see progress toward delivery on this stuff. It's true that they are way behind schedule on them, but it's not like there haven't been legitimate reasons.

It's not a lie to say that your underwear is full of skid marks and ALL your clothes are covered in sea men stains. That's no lie boy.

@@jennyanydots2389 r u ok

@@fjdididiididid1238 You don't ask questions boy you just do what you're told son. You got it or do you need me to sound out the words for you boy?

@@jennyanydots2389 would honestly like to see you sound out the words digitally so yes please

@@jennyanydots2389 aww, a smoothbrain musk cultist in the wild

Pixel or subpixel area seems like the best option to me. I mean there's only so much the manufacturers can do to beat physics

Full frame 35mm sensors are actually 36mm wide! (That would be 43mm diagonal)... At least the still side of cameras appears to be a little more honest.

And if they still use imperial measurements, they get a 1 year timeout in the corner, licenses to sell revoked. As much as I get triggered by "inches", I honestly never converted my TV and Monitor and Phone sizes to cm/mm. Only width to see how many of them would fit on my desk without tipping over on the sides :O There .. my 34'' wide screen is 86.36 cm..... now I know ...

Except then we'd call .91-1.00in sensors "1in Class" sensors.

sick petition

🤣🤣🤣 was thinking the same thing

accurate.

that's why it's a beta program, it's not finished, dont know if it will finish or if it won't, but just pointing it out.

How dare them believe what they were told from elon...

Because tech companies lie. It is that simple

just saying: cruise control :)

People hear what they want to hear. Cruise control has been confused for full self driving too. Stupid people will always find ways to kill themselves.

To be fair it is a really common misconception. Ask a few professional photographers- I bet half of them also don't know.

Chyna

@@TCSMaingot k

yeah, that's straight up lying!

Somebody at that company with marketing oversight definitely saw that mistake and intentionally let it pass.

That part....

Welcome to all of marketing in the history of ever

If they are meant to deceive, they are lies by definition

@@RickKasten Exactly, the product being good should not negate their lies. Some people are either too sympathetic to companies or just gullible.

They are lying. There's no way around it. You don't know what you're talking about if they are not.

I just don't get why inches is still used instead of the metric system.

@@BabaG_69 I'm measuring everyday for my job with inches and it's stupid. I'm with you on this!

Yeah that was really interesting!

Just like when you ask a guy about “his size”. There’s always this +- value you need to account for lol.

@@eadrianbasila why would you ask someone that

That's caused more by the confusion between GiB and GB

Same with KiloBITS vs KiloBYTES / Mb/S vs MB/s ... of course cable companies always list speeds in MegaBITS/Second because they know most people don't the difference and people will assume Megabytes... this is so shitty, not sure how these marketing people sleep at night.

@@altus3278 Really it's not confusion it's just mis marketing. Most storage sizes in the US are marketed by GB but then in the small print on the back of the box it will say 1GB = 1,000,000,000bytes. Anyway, I just said it reminded me of that situation, not that they are 1:1 the same.

They were the sizes they mentioned. The filesystem on the disk takes space too and people may have no idea what that is.

@@metaltyphoon Uhm, source? I'm pretty sure even windows doesn't hide the fact that the installation itself is space taken up on the drive, and that it was caused by the GiB/GB difference that shouldn't even exist in the first place. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Has a great team working with him!

only dumbass people use hp. kilowatts and nm's are used where im from.

@@kaimelis You don't need to call people dumbass to express that kilowatts and mn's are better than hp.

@@kaimelis nm is a dumb way of comparing the stuff. Way better with Nm at a certain RPM, to measure how actually usable the engine is.

It is a unit of measure. Can be converted to watts. Just like other imperial units. Use of it doesn't make you smarter or dumber depending on what you use.

It's one of the main reasons why sensible countries use metric.

They used to be. Then they found out they could make them smaller without losing any crucial strength

I have been lying to my wife about 9” for years😜

@@jameslyons158 she always knew, just kept quiet to make you feel better :)

That's what she said!

I thought of this immediately.

Rolling up the window

But then again, the 1" sensor is based on an industry standard. So I don't see that one as a problem or even a lack of evolution. It enables anyone who knows what they are talking about to make a comparison. It's also a little bit like the megapixel race we used to have with cameras. Most people don't even know how to interpret that, all they know is that the bigger the number, the better the picture will look.

@@Hans-gb4mv Industrial standards (and their related terms) get reviewed, revised, and renewed every year. I wonder why this one magically has not changed through all these years and companies insist on using the old term for a modern irrelevant product (using a term suitable for vacuum tubes when talking about digital sensors).

@@sh4hriar we still use ISO. It used to be that 100 was just a standardized film sensitivity, but now it's just the default sensitivity on a given digital camera, making it mean essentially nothing

ok

Dude same 💪🏻🤜🏻🤛🏻🤝🏻

Donut media fam!

MO POWAH BABEH

Lightning lightning lightning ⚡⚡⚡

Those guys are awesome

ok

Wow that's a new fact! It's always important to test real life performance.

5-10=-5. what?

@@chaklee435 It's a range, 5 to 10.

I think, when they say, 5nm, 7nm, it means the gap between two transistors.

Like when they say (two day battery) which means...two days if you never turn it on at all 😄

@@ILoveGrilledCheese my phone gets me through two days. I have pretty moderate to heavy use. Includes UKposts Instagram PDF, E-readers and browsing, with mobile data always turned on. with a couple of minutes of Spotify here and there. no gaming. around 15 hours of Screen time

@@beactivebehappy9894 wtf? 15 hours SOT? what kind of phone you have lmao

when in actuality, with moderate use, it's sort of like 6-8hrs

Headphones: 30 hours of play* (*with volume 2 out of 10)

The marketing department who makes these infographics, claims and advertisements actually have no deep understanding of the product they are marketing.

@@Kahvisuodatinpussi That's why we need regulation.

Yep. For what it's worth though, the one foot roll out is industry standard and all of the 0-60 times you see are measured this way. What's even more interesting is if you look at 5-60 times, they are always a good bit slower than 0-60. For example, Car and Driver reports that the 2021 Supra does 0-60 in 3.8 seconds (one foot rollout of 0.3 seconds excluded) and a rolling 5-60 time of 4.4 seconds. The 5-60 times can't take advantage of launch control so it's more representative of what you'll experience driving in normal conditions. Interesting stuff

You are forgetting about the cold air thrusters that the roadster is supposed to get.

@@juanmedinar20 exactly, he broke it all down on the Joe Rogan podcast

@@jarnold1789 it’s the American standard, here in Europe (or Germany at least) 0-100 is measured from a full stop. And 60 miles don’t equal 100km either, more like 96km.

​@@jarnold1789 It's only the american standard. European cars (which make the majority of performance cars where numbers like this are actually looked at) are all measuring 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) from a standing start without rollout. And in independent tests most of them hold their promised values or are just slightly off. Cars like Porsches often even beat their own numbers in test from journalists, WITHOUT rollout or other tricks.

Exactly!

Ya that shit is ridic.....and people actually believe it.

The sad part is when you compare it to a plug-in hybrid the fuel saving is only $250 a year. I don't know why they refuse to talk about plug in hybrids instead of going straight to higher priced EVs.

@@paladain55 It’s because EVs are quickly becoming far more desirable than plug-in hybrids, so companies like VW and Ford are trying to get ahead of that.

@@paladain55 250 for 5 years might only be 1250, but you also have to factor in oil changes which in the same period is probably going to bring it up to 2000. And that’s for a best case alternative that gets plugged in every day, and there’s some controversy on how often phev are. Not a fan of how Tesla lists the price, but in my case it’s way underestimated because I drive 20k miles per year, so the edge cases go in both directions.

@@paladain55 Because hybrids are terrible. They cost more than a gas car, have a weaker motor than the gas car, have a smaller battery than the BEV and only use less fuel if you drive like the driving cycle dictates. Many hybrids actually use mor fuel because they charge their battery. It’s a ridiculous technology that very few people buy. So why talk about it?

I read a comment a few months ago pointing out that Marques' channel is transitioning to analyzing industry trends that influence current tech products. I think it's really cool and significant in industries like smartphones, where the specs become more and more incremental. I think he realized that continuing down the path of comparing specs would become monotonous, whereas investigating industry trends can be massively insightful into controlling the products that do launch.

As an engineer I knew someone would notice that. Glad to to find you.

@@DJKrowbarKE yeah me too

It's really surprising that Tesla didn't catch this mistake in their presentation.

Scrolled down to like this comment

In the early 2000s there was a vaporware game console called the Phantom, you can read about that. There was also Nikola motors, which sold non-existent trucks. And the Cicret bracelet promised features that weren't even physically possible.

@@thecianinator the nikola one is probably the best example. It was horrible

Elon Musk has lied about just about every one of his companies and their deliverables. He promised fully self-driving vehicles by 2021, didn't happen. He promised the Boring Company would open a tunnel under the Bering Strait connecting Russia to Alaska in 2022, they haven't even gotten permits much less broken ground. He promised a fleet of robots would be launched in 2021 landing in 2024 to terraform Mars to prepare for humans landing in 2030, that is literally decades away from happening. The Hyperloop will never happen, because it breaks the laws of physics. The non-shattering glass, Tesla semis going into production in 2017 and available for purchase/lease in 2019, the list goes on and on.

@@RickKasten Is being late on a timeline really lying about a product? Like if we are supposed to ship a new version of software by a certain date, but it comes out 1 year later, it still shipped. Admittedly, the delivery date is wrong, but you still got the software. If you say you are going to make dinner for your significant other by 6pm, but you have challenges and don't deliver dinner until 7pm, did you lie about making dinner? You can't wrap Elon Musk up with Nikola or Theranos. The guy actually delivers. He set out to advance the speed of the auto industry transitioning to sustainable energy, and it's happening right now. He also set out to create low-cost space travel. Guess what, SpaceX has reusable rockets that land after going to space. They also catch fairings before they land in the ocean. Hyperloop was a tech paper, it was never a company. PepsiCo is getting their semis this month. Dude, when something has never been done before, how can you expect people to be exact on dates?

@@tstan6827 If a craftsman tells me he gets my sink installed by afternoon. I expect that it is installed at afternoon. If it isnt the case, the craftsman lied to me, because it is afternoon and my sink is not installed. The same is happening with Musk. He tells poeple during product shows wonderful tales of his products that are going to be available soon. So poeple start buying stock in the companies of Musk, because he talks about all the nice products that are going to hit the market soon.That in turn increases the value of the companies of Musk. Now it turns out Musk was just blowing smoke and his investors are holding a bag of stock that isnt as much worth as the real value of the company and they have to hope that at some point in time, his products do release, or they are going to lose a lot of money on the stocks they bought. The same thing already happened at other companies. Musk is just lucky to have actual products he can sell or he would also get hit by fraud charges like the CEOs of Theranos or Nikola.

Oh hey Cam

@@foreigner6195 luckily they dont replace one battery but 7104 batteries ;)

​@@foreigner6195 I can tell you. One report of a 2013 Model S needing a battery replacement now out of warranty, and Tesla quoted them $22.5k. That's a 85kWh battery. And cars like it sold for $25k in the market, so that's obviously not a great deal - even if it'd likely last 15+ more years. It was two (of 16) battery modules that were faulty, but Tesla doesn't provide partial battery replacement (under warranty they'd still replace the entire battery for servicing simplicity, at their own expense) so the owner found a third party repair shop that could do it for $5k. But this issue is much more rare than people thought it'd be back in 2013, which you might be alluding to, since there's both independent and Tesla-based data that shows an average Tesla battery pack has 90% capacity after ~180k miles - and they've improved their battery QA much since 2013 (especially since Jeff Dahn joined in 2016). The way I see it, the issue is that Tesla prides itself with high focus on design-for-assembly efficiency but neglects so many other aspects (that are industry standard) - like repairability. In theory, EVs have a lot less maintenance requirements and expenses but Tesla isn't focused on minimizing ownership costs - to me, it looks like they're focused on safety, future-proofing and increasing production. I think their approach is understandable, since it's terrible to rely on the goodwill of investors for funding, and you could make a utilitarian argument that they're still making a bigger impact by pushing the industry much faster than what they have any intention of (which was their ambition since back in 2008). It certainly satisfied the shareholders more when Tesla shifted from focus on customer-satisfaction to "maturing through profitability", and it made them far less susceptible to shaky criticisms (like battery fires, long-pipe arguments etc.). They've been in hypergrowth-mode ever since and have gotten a lot of valid criticism for not living up to repairability or build quality standards of their competitors. But I suspect out-of-warranty battery replacement is probably going to be one of those things that will be covered under car insurances since they're very uncommon but obviously vital and expensive, and the rest the drivetrain is likely to last much longer than the typical owner wants to own it. Unlucky early adopters will have to pay for it though - and it could take a while for that to change since EVs are probably a decade away from being primary global sales (battery supply cannot scale faster than that), three decades away from being primary ownership (100M cars/year -> 2B cars on the road) and thus up to four decades away from their TCO's being intuitively understood by most people. In the meantime though, you can still own a Tesla several years under warranty and sell it off for low depreciation, and avoid that risk if it's a high concern for you. Or trust the numbers and find a way to insure yourself out of that risk.

Your work is dope.

So it appears its a marketing scam.

@Instagram User you're everywhere.. get some life

Uber and Lyft: “Be your own boss.” Facebook: “Free and always will be.” Elon Musk: “Teslas will be built on Mars in 40 years.” Saying techies lie is like saying lava is hot.

like Marques, but you do realise this “breakdown” is quite obvious facts, nothing new?!

No decir toda la verdad es mentir ...

Not lies though are they

Already thinking of remixes before you finish watching the original. I like it.

@@mkbhd yooo that would be awesome :)

That Tesla looks awesome though

Haha yea

Yes

Are you sure you didn’t have the auto subtitles enabled by default? Because I don’t see subtitles

these subs were not synced...

Huh. I turned off CC because I was seeing Eng subs that were very late.

nice sony product placement bro!

he did not talk about op stealing user data selling it to third party and selling their phones for cheap calling those flagship killers.

Anger? Timestamp?

He didn’t even mention FSD in vaporware so he was very nice. Fsd by definition can’t be babysat so Tesla don’t have it until it’s level 5

@@curt8806 Is it vaporware though? I mean they are actively and very publicly developing it. Or perhaps it will turn into vaporware if it turns out they can't do it with the current camera configuration only?

@@ingerasulffs imo it's vaporware because they are selling it right now as fsd when it clearly isn't. I can't sell people ice-cream and just send them milk and tell them I will eventually learn how to make ice-cream.

Tesla literally owes him a car and change

@Instagram User which content?

Remember, GM is leading the EV market

future goals*

PISS

Elon Musk is the worst of the bunch

It's almost like they use it sound cool and sell vehicles to idiots.

You've obviously never attempted to merge onto a highway in Atlanta in a 95 horsepower 78 Chevy Malibu. Joining 75mph traffic is scary when the short onramp only permits you to attain 40mph. I know, that problem is a thing of the past.

Except model y. That was early

@@CatalystNetwork Because the CT and R 2.0 were late.

Yes, Semi is nowhere, Roadster is nowhere, Robotaxis are nowhere, Full-Self Driving is not actually full self driving, etc. I like their cars, but I don't trust what Elon says, lol.

@Joe tbh just get the enhanced autopilot it’s enough, buying the FSD is just wasting 12.000$ for promises.

Lol so true, still waiting on the cybertruck

I was about to comment that. lol

i tried im going to the hospital

Take a drink

No.

@@drewski91 I admire your will and ability to type regardless.

On point

Bra....

"Unemployment Rates" are probably the best example. They can range from 4% to 25% depending on how you define and measure the exact same data.

???

It's closer to 14 if I'm not mistaken, not 15. But yeah, 1 horse makes around 14 horse power. It's so ass backwards at a glance, but when you go back through the history of it, it sort of makes more sense

Why would they want to showcase a smaller number

That’s the maximum power of a horse. While the unit we call “horsepower” is based on its SUSTAINABLE power.

@@juzoli this is actually also listed, check out Porsche "boost" horsepower ratings

It's Newton-meter that they're talking about here, measurement of torque

From mirrorless to meaningless, my dude

you at least got your money back… right?

@@johnnulf624 nope

Oh man i remember those days, i had one & it was too sad they just quite without further notice. And the money wasted on their cameras :(

@@RJ-Isaac-TSOML That sucks. I’m guessing it was too late to return :(

Yes, critical thinking is a good skill to posses - in everything.

Increasingly the case with these robber barons.

Instagram User lol leave dude we don't need your bs here your content is trash

iPhone 14

Mmhm

Ya exactly, if they DIDN'T do this they'd be dumb

I agree.

Engineering explained has a detailed explanation on the whole 0-60 thing. Check it out if interested.

Shouldn't we measure the 0-62mph time too?

Yet the best times, and most accurately measured, are at a drag strip where the 1' rollout occurs because of the way drag strips work.

I depend how precise is 0... especially with modern GPS... 0 is never 0... never was... precision just changed... before 1980(GPS) dragstrip method with rollout was most common, repeatable ,precise way to get 0-60... it never was -0-60 and new GPS 0-60 are not real 0-60 precision only changed...