Mars....... LMFAO, yeah sure.

It would be nice that we including the European Union. Build a space station ship yard in orbit. So we can build bigger.

Love what you do

👍

Starship is not actually big, just the biggest yet for our species. Thousands of years ago much bigger spaceships have been here, read your Bible and the Bagavadgita.

@@wordwizard3912 thats illogical google the word.

@@wordwizard3912 Meanwhile, your stupidity is real

@@wordwizard3912 are u a troll? Cuz if u are serious then you need to reconsider your life

Its probably cuz space community = smart people

@@wordwizard3912 What's all fake? JW

True!

thats exactly what I was thinking about

Very Ralph Macquarie, I'm sure its intentional.

@@mokzilla9330 I'm pretty sure it's both intentional and coincidental at the same time. Starship looks how does because of the astronautical and aeronautical physics calculations and simulations done to determine the best and most efficient and cost effective design. So the way it looks is of course intentional. While I never heard of Buck Rodgers or his comics, I can assume he intentionally designed spaceships in them from his imagination. It is actually a coincidence that the actual best design for the real life SpaceX Starship and the ones in those old comics look similar, but it's also very cool coincidence.

@@Mindwipe96 you've never heard of Buck Rodgers?

XD

Time to cancel it feelings matter

@@thebush6077 Ha! Of course, that is what needs to be done. Feelings matter far more than space exploration.

@James Quinlan man: i do

The first step is done. As of May 5, 2020, starship SN 15 HAS LANDED!!!

Im sure by then the CGI will be much improved and will give you what you want

​@@thecritialtruth Haha! I'm sure by then CGI will have improved so much that you'll _still_ buy into faked conspiracies. It's not like some black sheep among "sceptics" don't use CGI in order to prey on idiots like yourself. Admittedly, I don't know you, but I've heard that CGI argument many times and it speaks for a general position (which is also why my reply is much longer than your comment). NASA, ESA, SpaceX, Roscosmos etc. regularly use CGI for illustration purposes. Some things are just explained more easily with some nice graphics, starting with the problem that nobody floats in space with a space-suit and a camera in order to capture external ("3rd person view") rocket or satellite footage, so there are very good reasons to use CGI for illustrations, without any intentions to mislead or cheat. The thing is: it's no secret that some footage is highly edited or entirely computer-generated. There is no hiding. You should also ask yourself about plausibility and motive. It's not plausible that hundreds of thousands of people involved in the space industry do their jobs without a single wistle-blower or death-bed confession over so many decades. Motive: what I usually hear then is "tax money". That doesn't add up, either. The buildings of these agencies exist, people go to work there, they get paid every month, there is plenty of evidence that all the "hardware" (rockets and facilities for their construction, launch sites, museum objects etc.) exist. All that costs so much money that there is no real profit to be made by stealing tax money (and SpaceX is a private company: they do receive tax money, but only for fulfilling a function and delivering results, like transporting people to ISS). Now compare all that to the typical alleged "proof" from conspiracy websites: 99% is already debunked, the rest is only a matter of time. But there's another problem: you can buy into a conspiracy out of stupidity or lack of scientitic education, but there are also many "faked fakes" online, where people manipulate original footage for fun in order to fool people like you (to give an example: the deepfake Nixon speech about the moonlanding disaster). So here's the motive for people to make up and spread conspiracy stories: fun! The more convincing the story is, the more it is liked and shared, the happier the author. You think you see beyond CGI tricks, but in reality you're far more of a CGI victim than any people of science. To say it with your own words: CGI gives guys like YOU "what you want". That confirmation bias must give you a lot of satisfaction, right?

@Saksham Shukla I cant wait, will be a historic event.

I was reading this when it happened.

I don't want a ride on a delicate and fragile booster full of fuel. Nope

lol... yeah I am glad to hear that... hope you'll subscribe and join us... this is a good look at what we're hoping to do here on this channel going forward!

@@TwoBitDaVinci The reason Musk immediately donated 30 millions to schools after SN11 is to avoid lawsuits about contaminating private and public property with the consequences of his eccentric idiosyncratic ideas. Most people can not save even a million in their lifetime???

@@reasonerenlightened2456 you’re right, he should be normal like everyone else! It’s a shame we have eccentric, idiosyncratic innovators who rapidly progress our technology. I mean, PayPal, Tesla...the audacity of this man, with his successful attempts at accelerating the advancement of autonomous electric vehicles, e-commerce, and now human space flight?! And it’s especially a shame that he’s donated the millions of dollars that “most people” haven’t saved, to fund and improve their public education. 😂🤦‍♀️

​@@hayleyyn First, Musk is a product of circumstances, not a driver of destiny. Stop idolising him. Second, $30 million for a multi-billionaire like Musk is more or less what $9 is for a minimum wage worker. Tesla, PayPal, SpaceX, etc. are not there to help the human-people, those entities help only businesses by enabling faster wealth harvesting from the lifeforce of the human-people. What would be really impressive is if one of those multi-billionaires comes up with a politico-economic system which results in a topology of optimal Wealth and Power distribution among the humans to ensure their dignified existence in perpetuity. (Such multi-billionaire would be a really extraordinary human being worthy of worshiping and idolising.)

Sadly he didn’t. He doesn’t understand how rockets work and got most of it embarrassingly wrong.

@Mike: that was very well said . Wish I had said it. Came here to say something like that but I'll just agree with you and make reference to "what Mike said" .

😂 haha lolll

Me: (also sitting on my couch) I understand the challenges

@@precursorsExactly! it’s the hardest part.

lol, it took 5 tries to land

Hi Mchael, I've been scrolling through the comments. Ricky has replied to comments that came after yours, so it's not clear why he hasn't replied to yours. I just submitted my own comment with corrections, but most likely the window of opportunity has passed. (As in, Ricky probably not reading further comments to this video)

Thanks

So glad to hear it Sean!!

Same!

Glad you liked it and thank yoU! this is a look at the shape of things to come!

@@TwoBitDaVinci thank you for making this easier to understand, the most I know about rockets was from building them in the rocket club I was in, in elementary school😜

Thank you so much 😀

@@TwoBitDaVinci Where's the Universities and Colleges that train people to bring all this to reality? Is there any recruiters for these specialized jobs? I'm referring to those designing and building these machines, habitats, life support equipment, superfast communication systems, on planets transportation systems, Planetary energy systems? Bathrooms?

bravo ! Thanks to Musk and him crew.Regards to all from Slovenia.

Why is the starship so big? Because "the tyranny of the rocket" Explains how this helps and what the continued plan is and how they are doing this (engine, cost, etc) -end video Its called explaining? go search on google for answears instead of watching a vid

Lol what the fuck point do you think you were even trying to make there. Do you even know what the tyranny of the rocket equation is?

thank you so much, we really appreciate the kind words, this is truly a look at the future of the channel!

@Peter Evans you have lived a very sad life to be this petty.

@Peter Evans sadly this vid got the science embarrassingly wrong.

@@TwoBitDaVinci Keep it going. How about some habitats designs for starter stages and then how it'll grow. How will humans deal with secluded in small habitat(s)? Balloon habitats? I don't think it'll survive a meteor shower. I saw an architect use a gaming software to design habitats and having them connected. Or something like that. I believe it was Fred Mills' B1M UKposts channel. Next we're going to need Robotic 3D construction workers. How do one get training for that? Gonna need some of these people stationed up there be Engineers/Construction Teams. They can figure out how to build most of what is needed for long haul stays up there. Also some behaviorist scientists too. Who's going to be the chefs, food prep, & cleanup crews? Farmers?

@@robertlee8805 That is what makes up a colony, WORKERS

Do you know there are satellites in space called *HIVES* and inside them are small rockets called *BEES?* Guess what they *TARGET* your *CELL* phone. Your *CELL* phone is a Beacon (bee con) and the missiles are its Bees and they are made to find their *CELLS* and when they do *BOOM!* Do you remember the RV in Tennessee that blew up? Find the conspiracy videos showing what really happened. In them you can see a small missile with a chem-trail behind it. Now go read the Book of Revelation in the Bible where it talks about the Scorpions stinging people for 5 months. It's referring to what I just told you above. The author was seeing multiple chem-trails falling from the skies with little stingers on the ends of them (a scorpions tail).. and the only way he could describe them for others to understand was to refer to them as *"Scorpions".* Do yourself a favor go buy shortwave radio walkies-talkies, some of them have a radius up-to 5 miles. And everyone should start buying phone jammers in-case their neighbors don't know, at least you can help stop some of them. According to the Bible, they will do this for 5 months raining down on mankind. Beware world your Government is coming after you in more ways than you know. Please come to my channel and let me share something really special to you. Nothing is monetized. Please come.

Let's form a rocket company and do it before he does

@@NwoDispatcher Lol I wish, but I ain't a genius like Elon so I hope you are

@@downyourtube Wow 😲 you are so right!!! Yes, you do need to believe everything that website tells you. I have a Nigerian uncle who wants to contribute $1M to your cause. Just send me your details and bank account number and a small fee, and the money's yours!

@@downyourtube WOW, really? unBEElievable.

Much appreciated Travis, if you think others would like it, we'd love a share!

@@TwoBitDaVinci definitely will, I live close to up in Temecula area. Appreciate all the great information you send out. I have Tesla and solar. Good stuff

Only if Elon Musk van live for 200 years longer we'd have a couple of colonies by then or sooner. And Space Stations that are in our solar system then a dozen or 3 dozen of them out of our solar system.

Ikr!

@@robertlee8805 they can’t send starships out of our systems we would need better tech like maybe anti gravity machine and a propeller in the front as a small source for some electric ⚡️ engines when it is still getting into/out of orbits on the second stage.

Glad you liked it James, and thank you for your kind words! My editor in chief Juan reached new heights in this one, lots of 3D using Blender

​@@TwoBitDaVinci By the time Musk gets to Mars, the scientist at CERN would probably find a way to cancel gravity. At such point in time Musk becomes obsolete and space travel will be a trivial matter....and we will have flying cars too. (Cancelling gravity is the way forward. Then we would be able to get in and out of black holes too.)

They gave up on recovery I believe

@@cee8029 I thought they were gonna switch to recovering them from the water

@@cee8029 They only gave up trying to catch the fairing by nets using two ships Ms. Tree & Ms. Chief.

They give up on all their projects. Because its hype. Even the Falcon, was supposed to be 3 stages that land under power. That promise, is why we have privatized space now. The Truth is, we parachute the capsule, burn up the 2nd stage, and the 3rd stage has to fly 10 times to _Start_ paying for itself. They gave up on Heavy (how many people do you guys give shit, about how awesome Falcon Heavy was _going_ to be) Hyperloop, the fastest train ever from NY to LA.. is now a few Teslas, being driven in tunnels underneath the Vegas Civic Center. 40,000 starlinks with 2-4 year life span at 200miles up.. is *a rocket launch every 2 days.. For Eternity* Starship is fantasy. If you really want to see humans back in space, you guys better start thinking critically.

@@bartacomuskidd775 They do recover the fairing... Just saw it at port Canevaral couple hours ago. Projects evolve, maybe in the future we will see a stage 2 recovery. Or they just gonna use Starship for everything(my opinion) maybe they make a smaller version of starship. Since they plan to make it almost 100% re-usable

🤣 underrated comment

Thanks a ton Andre, we will do!!

Yes absolutely

Than why are iss ppl always flying in almost zero gravity??

@@anilish5005 I know this is a super late reply but if you’re still wondering, imagine you’re falling off a building, when you’re falling, you don’t “feel” gravity, you are going down yes, but all your internal organs are falling at the same rate as the rest of your body, so you don’t notice it, because normally, your organs hang down because gravity is pulling on them, while you stand up, while if you’re falling, your body and insides are stationary relative to each other and therefore you experience “weightlessness”, the ISS is, technically “falling” towards the earth, but due to lack of atmospheric drag and the ridiculously high speed it is traveling at, it goes around it, always falling downward but the curvature of the earth prevents it from hitting the planet, TLDR; falling objects don’t really experience gravity.

Apparently at SpaceX they were postulating about the idea of strapping two more falcon 9s to falcon heavy.

We can already reach all the planets, the main question is how much cargo you want to take. A human mission to mars would already take several rockets, the martian (both book and movie) paint a fairly good picture on what it would take. This is also confirmed by SpaceX. So taking a human misson 12 times as far would require a multitude of rockets.

thank you Martin! curious what does BRGD stand for?

@@TwoBitDaVinci best regards for you 😊

Yes, you are completely right. Even 200km up, gravity has only dropped by 6%. He shows the equations, but then never plugs in the numbers to see that his argument doesn't hold.

Dont need to be picky to criticise this vid. He is embarrassingly wrong about how rockets get to orbit.

@@andrewpaulhart yeap. Super heavy doesn’t take starship to hundreds of miles off of earth. Just gets it out of most of the atmosphere. Also doesn’t talk about sideways velocity, where a huge portion of energy goes to.

Wait till you see how they generate electricity...

@@gauravtejpal8901 water, solar, wind and hydrothermal in my country.

@@tafftastic The same methods in my country + couple of nuclears. I was talking about Turbines. They spin the turbines either by dropping water on them or by using steam...

@TRUTH _ idk man, I too went down the rabbit hole of western civilization collapsing and decaying, but maybe things aren't as bad and hopeless as some make it out to be. with china on the rise and most of Europe being a lost cause at this point, It would seem reasonable to condemn the world into a metaphorical dark age. however most of the greatest threats facing us and they're leaders are just as fragile as we seem to view ourselves. America at least still has a bit of spunk left in it. our forefathers didn't cross the ocean to an untamed land just to have their decedents loose hope for a brighter tomorrow. in a way, the Starship program is quite similar to the founding of the 13 colonies. A great leap of the bravest pioneers plunging into the unknown and dangerous. And once again America is leading the cutting edge of the free worlds ambitions. don't swallow the black pill my friend. there is still hope for humanity's great tomorrow.

@TRUTH _ people are waking up. Even if it is slowly. But the people that control the media are pushing a narrative that everyone that thinks like you and me are truly alone. We don't believe them about the propaganda they spew so why should this be any different? Hard times are coming believe me. But I do believe itll be little more then a footnote in history. There'll be a backlash to the political system when things get hard enough for people to not care about what they loose. America tends to wear our problems on its sleeve. And once things get a little less comfortable the people will take action as they always do.

Wow, thank you!

haha me too!

People will die, but there will be multiple un- manned landings before sending people. So hopefully the risk will be minimal.

The risk will always be there no matter what, but I believe there will be test runs on the moon first, and that should be enough to minimize risks.

@@robertfalconer5089 Yep. Just like the Concord. They're still flying those, right? Uh...right?

Glad you like them! We just got our hands on a second RTX 3090 to help increase our render speeds!

Lmao

Really! Interesting my wife will get a kick out of that. Thanks for sharing!

I totally agree!

Glad you like it!

Much appreciated!

Not sure but we are changing directions a bit and this is a look at our future so we’re pumped you have found us! Hope you’ll be a regular!

Haha so funny

And what about your mom? Why is she so big?

Funny

Isn't it a she?

Zzz don't give up your day job gamer

Not sure if it’s you Katie or Dusty but thanks! Really worked hard on this one

More to come!

Thank you you just made my day :)

@@TwoBitDaVinci Ricky. Can you do some videos on building up on these planets and space stations?

Great to hear!

So glad to hear it bill!!! Wont let you down!

It is just unfortunate that we probably won't be alive when the really cool stuff happens.

@@shaun6828 really cool stuff happens on 2030 and 2050

@@seeker8672 I think a big chunk of what happens and when will be determined by what we do with general purpose AI. Hard to say what will happen when beings vastly smarter than humans start influencing our development.

@@shaun6828 probably/hopefully positive influence

would probably absolutely destroy any launch pad it launches from

@@Live4PLAY3 That's why you engineer a launch pad to handle said event.

@@osian4182 will be one hell of an engineering problem to tackle. I mean, from what I read an 18 meter wide starship will produce about the amount of energy that was released by the hiroshima bomb

Bigger is always cheaper per kg. Early planes were small compared to current.

@@Live4PLAY3 Tue, but this is what Elon is know for. "Electric car aren't viable"? Get your tesla. "You can't reuse rocket"? I guess, I have my falcon 9 now. He is doing it with crew mission to Mars. So if he say he wants a 18m diameter rocket, I'm positive he will eventually

Eric 100% agree my friend, there's nothing that compares to the awe of space. I rewatch shows like star-trek too... I think the modern space era will inspire a huge new generation of young physicists, engineers and astronauts!

@@TwoBitDaVinci Indeed it is and frankly... I believe much is owed to Elon for invigorating science & technology in the public way for a better future. It would be so cool to be an young engineer at SpaceX today! Working for a truely great leader is rare! I was blessed yrs ago to be hired by a former NASA Dir. of Apollo Reliability, Quality & Safety after the Navy stole him to come and be a change agent to drive Reliability into our defenses at ASN(RD&A). Haha, now I consult for his son, both brilliant engineers as bosses! These are very exciting days, but even more exciting today! 😀

I didn't know that, they would be different.

_"Would be good if you looked into the "100" people to Mars, over 3 months, and all their supplies for the base, return and time to spemd on Mars."_ Why? That's a empty assertion, because that is not and was never the plan! 100 hundred passengers per trip is the aspirational goal for the (distant) future when there is already a city on Mars. The first few trips will see much fewer Astronauts or settlers per Starship.

@@3gunslingers - Well, even when (not if, it will be done at some stage) there is a city on Mars, will all the associated facilities for life support there, you will not get 100 people into Starship for a 3 month trip. There is a good NASA paper on space required per person, per time.

@@antonyborlase3965 This paper is for hard working astronauts, not passengers. Even tho passengers need their volume, too, the requirements are quite different. Yes, 100 people on board will be crammed, but it's not this will be a joy cruise anyway. But the 100 passengers were an aspirational goal anyway by Musk. Maybe we will only see 85 maximum before the 12 or 18 meter Starship variant comes online.