Why Spacecraft Are Using These Crazy Routes To The Moon - Weak Stability and Ballistic Capture.

  Переглядів 316,525

Scott Manley

Scott Manley

Рік тому

For decades spacecraft would fly direct to the moon and then brake into lunar orbit, but these days most spacecraft take long circuitous routes, dancing on the edge of stability near the lagrange points of the sun-earth-moon system. These techniques save propellent at the expense of time and navigation complexity.
They use the theory of weak stability boundaries and ballistic capture in the 3 body problem, to make this possible, and it's an idea which was first discovered in the early 1990's and has now become the main route for modern spacecraft.
Some of the orbit visualizations use Universe Sandbox
universesandbox.com/
Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
/ djsnm
I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
/ discord
If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
/ scottmanley

КОМЕНТАРІ: 772
@sirjohniv
@sirjohniv Рік тому
Hitchhikers Guide to Lunar Orbit
@andrewharrison8436
@andrewharrison8436 Рік тому
Don't Panic
@pucmahone3893
@pucmahone3893 Рік тому
Gravitate to the watering hole, Drink 3 intergalactic gargle blasters and wait for the gold brick wrapped in lemon to smash your head. Then everything seems so normal!
@stuart207
@stuart207 Рік тому
🖖
@dmacpher
@dmacpher Рік тому
Do YOU know where your TLI burn towel is?
@petevenuti7355
@petevenuti7355 Рік тому
@@andrewharrison8436 if you got your thumb out, not enough time to panic.
@MrArzorth
@MrArzorth Рік тому
I’m an orbital mechanics engineer at ESA and I wouldn’t have explained it better 👏🏼👏🏼
@blaksu
@blaksu Рік тому
hi, do you know Prof Mark McCaughrean?
@Bramon83
@Bramon83 Рік тому
No offense but probably worse for the layman
@Embassy_of_Jupiter
@Embassy_of_Jupiter Рік тому
I'm not an orbital mechanics engineer at ESA and I definitely could have explained it worse than either of you
@realcygnus
@realcygnus Рік тому
Awesome
@anteshell
@anteshell Рік тому
I'm an orbital mechanics engineer at KSC and I have no idea how to reach orbit. I just add more boosters.
@duxangus
@duxangus Рік тому
This is mathematically and physically beautiful and I cannot imagine the happiness the original scientists felt when putting all of this together
@conradandrew825
@conradandrew825 Рік тому
As a straight man, I don't think penises are beautiful, but hey, you do you! 😆
@WoWSondo
@WoWSondo Рік тому
@@conradandrew825 U not seen them tip to tip then =/
@Tinil0
@Tinil0 Рік тому
It always strikes me how complex yet simple orbital mechanics are. Like, it's absolutely complex but we can VERY easily describe the movements of the heavens with surprising accuracy far into the past or future with "simple" equations.
@spacelapsus8835
@spacelapsus8835 Рік тому
Belbruno almost lost his job at JPL researching this topic in the early days LOL. There's a TEDtalk he did on it quite a while back.
@simonmultiverse6349
@simonmultiverse6349 Рік тому
Never mind KERBAL space program... what about *HERBAL* space program? Take enough herbal stuff and you'll *REALLY* feel as if you're flying. It might technically be ever so slightly illegal, and you can't buy it at a chemist, but it's unforgettable.
@seunghobaik4447
@seunghobaik4447 Рік тому
Danuri is Korea’s first lunar satellite! It wasn’t originally planned to do these harder, efficient orbit maneuvers but they kept adding new equipments and sensors to the satellite to a point where they had no options but to take the harder approach. Crazy considering that this is our first spacecraft to the moon. Anyways, huge thanks to Scott for covering space launches and projects from Korea in your videos!
@UD503J
@UD503J Рік тому
It is a really innovative solution to get an efficient orbital trajectory. Hopefully it will inspire others to get low-cost scientific payloads to the Moon.
@dsdy1205
@dsdy1205 Рік тому
> kept adding new eqpts and sensors to the satellite scope creep is a hell of a drug
@g38jj53qofmt
@g38jj53qofmt Рік тому
And here is another Korean subscriber same as me lol
@sxj42
@sxj42 Рік тому
Thanks for additional information!
@konstantinkh
@konstantinkh Рік тому
Thinking of the Lagrange points as low effective potential "portals" between Hill spheres is an amazing insight. Thanks for sharing it. I've seen (and derived) the effective potential contour maps many, many times in my life, but never thought of the implications in quite this way. It certainly makes the captures, whether planned or accidental, so much more intuitive.
@MartinMizner
@MartinMizner Рік тому
It's kinda crazy that only 50 meters of dV is enough to go past Moon to the edge of Earth's sphere of influence.
@killsode4760
@killsode4760 Рік тому
That's gravity wells for ya
@Br3ttM
@Br3ttM Рік тому
It's only enough if you do it close to the earth, when you're going fastest. Escaping a gravity well costs energy, but your fuel budget is change in velocity, with how rockets work. Since energy is proportional to the square of velocity, changing velocity when you're going fast is a much bigger difference than when you are going slowly (it's called the Oberth effect).
@Ranged66
@Ranged66 Рік тому
Awesome stuff, n-body physics interactions are fascinating. Have you heard of the Interplanetary Transport Network? It's the concept that all these chaotic interactions create 'pathways' between the Lagrange points of pretty much every body in the solar system. From the Moon to Jupiter, without a single drop of fuel. You'll just need a LOT of patience. (for everything to line up, and for all the natural gravity assists...)
@absalomdraconis
@absalomdraconis Рік тому
I think there technically is a little fuel requirement, to get the initial kick from Lagrange to the path you actually want instead of staying at the Lagrange point. And I guess a bit to compensate for inaccuracies, but eh, details.
@jasonreed7522
@jasonreed7522 Рік тому
I think the need for patience is a problem with it, unfortunately humans get old and die, and hardware goes obsolete so its not like we can wait 50years for something to navigate it way out to Neptune riding this network just to save on fuel. (Although it may be useful within a planetary system like Jupiter or Saturn where the travel distance is much smaller so the timeframe is reduced to something much more tollerable)
@andrewbennett7478
@andrewbennett7478 Рік тому
The "interplanetary highway" concept is awesome, I'm pretty lucky to have gotten the opportunity to learn underneath faculty who has contributed immensely to it. So with that I have to plug his youtube channel - ukposts.info/the/9ZvnHwvAR4XkjKzKxhYDDg.html
@Winallmoney
@Winallmoney Рік тому
He's mentioned it before. Nothing in depth that I'm aware of, just as a concept.
@elmobrandao9849
@elmobrandao9849 Рік тому
Maybe someday, this way, one will be able to finally lend Venus a moonlet
@fratop
@fratop Рік тому
Did my PhD on ballistic capture, worked with Ed Belbruno at Princeton University, and I'm currently an active researcher on this topic. Yet, I'm always fascinated by this concept as the first days I started studying it.
@izharulhaq2436
@izharulhaq2436 Рік тому
Your email address please
@bermchasin
@bermchasin Місяць тому
and still find the lunar transfer chart very phallic
@bprud6443
@bprud6443 Рік тому
I really need to try one of these with the Principia mod one of these days. Amazing stuff and the 3D diagram of gravity around the lagrange points really makes everything click into place.
@clayel1
@clayel1 Рік тому
principia has a 3d diagram of gravity?
@Archgeek0
@Archgeek0 Рік тому
@@clayel1 I don't think it does, but I feel like it definitely should! (In a limited capacity, so as not to melt players' machines)
@user-si5fm8ql3c
@user-si5fm8ql3c Рік тому
@@Archgeek0 Thats actually a planned feature, funnily enough, simplifying the gravity diagram is where they are stuck right now from what i can gather. Not because the PC cant render it, but because the player cant get use out of a diagram too complicated
@bprud6443
@bprud6443 Рік тому
@@clayel1 Oh no, sorry, I meant the diagrams in the video make it click into place for me.
@I.amthatrealJuan
@I.amthatrealJuan Рік тому
I never thought of using Universe Sandbox to reverse engineer orbits like that. Now I have something new to play with. Thanks, Scott. I also am quite surprised that these techniques were developed only very recently.
@williampeek7943
@williampeek7943 Рік тому
I remember reading about Bellbruno's work a little over a decade ago. I hunted him down online and emailed him to ask if it was possible to recreate this kind of orbit on the space flight simulator called Orbiter. He actually wrote me back with all kinds of diagrams and explanations. I still haven't been able to totally recreate it on Orbiter but your video helps out a lot. Thanks.
@kylenolan3138
@kylenolan3138 Рік тому
I've struggled to visualize how bodies are captured into orbits without delta-V. Now it's crystal clear. Thank you.
@joshuahammond1862
@joshuahammond1862 Рік тому
I know someone who worked on the Lunar Flashlight mission, learning more about it is so cool :O
@cognitivefailure
@cognitivefailure Рік тому
I'd be really interested to hear much mass (as a percentage of the spacecraft's mass) these maneuvers save the craft's designers. Seems like it has to be substantial for the time and effort they spend to perform it successfully! The calculation and risk assessment that must go into it is mind-boggling.
@lancelotlake7609
@lancelotlake7609 Рік тому
I don't believe these low delta-v trajectories should EVER be considered for manned space flight. Exposing astronauts to the stresses of Earth-Lunar transit for an additional 3 days, round trip, is unconscionable. It's not like they're taking extra payload.. they're not even taking a lander, FFS!
@sil8127
@sil8127 Рік тому
You’d be interested in the delta V difference
@johndododoe1411
@johndododoe1411 Рік тому
@@sil8127 I'm guessing he wants the mass cost of that delta-v for those real spacecraft with their real technical limitations.
@dsdy1205
@dsdy1205 Рік тому
@@johndododoe1411 well that depends a lot on other factors, like the dry mass, the thruster specific impulse, etc. It's easier to use the delta-v savings as a yardstick, then go from there. For instance, spacecraft propellant mass is directly proportional to dry mass. So a 1 ton dry mass craft might save a thousand times more propellant mass than a 1 kilogram dry mass spacecraft given the same delta-v savings
@termitreter6545
@termitreter6545 Рік тому
This one is pretty easy to make a vague guess. Scott said the apogee rise to the moon is 2800 d/v, plus 50 for the high orbit. And then you save most of the insertion burn. According to google, thats 600-700 d/v for an isertion burn you mostly save. Which doesnt sound like much, but considering rocket size (and cost) rises exponentially compared to range, its probably worth it. I dont think the risk and calculation is a big deal tho. Someone figured out the math, made the tools and software. From then onwards you get easy, accurate numbers in comparably little time. Just a guy trying numbers in a compture, then doubly check the course. If your spacecraft can do an accurate lunar insertion, then it can probably do this maneuver already, its just a longer mission.
@user-vp1sc7tt4m
@user-vp1sc7tt4m Рік тому
Kudos to your acknowledgment of Ed Bellbruno and his contribution to object deployment in the space environment.
@AndyStarr0
@AndyStarr0 Рік тому
I took a class this last semester that focused entirely on finding periodic and quasi-periodic orbits and orbital transfers in the circular restricted 3 body problem, as well as extending these results to find solutions in ephemeris models. Fascinating stuff and really cool to see it used in real life!!
@Flourish38
@Flourish38 Рік тому
Seeing that capture tube extend all the way out from the moon was so cool!! It really helped tie the concept together in my head as well. ❤
@davidfell5496
@davidfell5496 Рік тому
Awesome video. Love the casual solving of a 4-body problem by 2 x 3-bidy problems!
@jackryan6446
@jackryan6446 Рік тому
I thought that was really interesting too. Sort of like breaking a normal physics problem into multiple vectors, then adding them up, except in 3D and with exponential relationships LOL
@absolutehuman951
@absolutehuman951 Рік тому
That's not a 4 or even 3 body problem tho? The mass of the spacecraft is negligible and the Sun - Mun interactions are not the focus of it. It's 1 body (which is the spacecraft) and a field of different forces.
@Kyzyl_Tuva
@Kyzyl_Tuva Рік тому
Great stuff Scott. I love your deep-dives in orbital mechanics.
@spacedbro
@spacedbro Рік тому
My favorite line "Did any of you find this overly complicated? Don't worry it's much more complex in real life" 😂
@MoonWeasel23
@MoonWeasel23 Рік тому
I think if you did a video on coordinate transformations, you'd have enough material to just teach a university orbital mechanics course. Certainly better than the one I got...
@mini_bunney
@mini_bunney Рік тому
honestly yes, I've certainly learned more about orbital mechanics from Scott than from the one or two lectures about it that we had in our space technology courses...
@mortiphago
@mortiphago Рік тому
Who would've thunk that rocket science was this complex
@truBador2
@truBador2 Рік тому
Great stuff. I heave a sigh of relief over straightforward mechanical explanations. This is a perfect public level of science. Well done!
@jlynch1024
@jlynch1024 Рік тому
That is amazing. Thank you Ed Belbruno for discovering these orbits. Genius!
@MikeWiggins1235711
@MikeWiggins1235711 Рік тому
THIS is why all the JPL scientists have to be locked up every night! 🤭
@filip5519
@filip5519 Рік тому
This is so high level, big respect Mr. Manley!
@Flor-ian
@Flor-ian Рік тому
Great video! Love this kind of content. Very informative and not too computation-intensive!
@multivariateperspective5137
@multivariateperspective5137 Рік тому
I got to see Scott. I always look forward to watching your videos. Awesome stuff. Thanks for all your time and energy. Excellent job.
@benhouse5515
@benhouse5515 Рік тому
That is absolutely wild. Blew my mind. The illustrations really do it justice. Thanks for documenting this!
@jpdemer5
@jpdemer5 Рік тому
Every time I read or hear somebody proposing that a planet "captured" a passing body and made it a moon, I think of the delicate - and extremely unlikely - orbital mechanics required to make that possible. You'd need some sort of decelerating collision, at just the right time and place, to act as an "insertion burn". (Anybody think that tidal forces could enable the process, given enough time?)
@index7787
@index7787 Рік тому
Interesting thought on tidal forces.
@DragosIlas
@DragosIlas Рік тому
The way I think about it is basically a bi-elliptic transfer from LEO to the moon's orbit, but using the Sun's gravity to perform the velocity change at apogee.
@matthewellisor5835
@matthewellisor5835 Рік тому
0:30 What a very sturdy-looking orbit. I don't think a grade 7 pupil could (/would) have done better (/differently.)
@red_rassmueller1716
@red_rassmueller1716 Рік тому
I was wondering how far I would have to scroll to find the first comment about it
@dylanwho
@dylanwho Рік тому
Very sturdy indeed...
@Henrik.Yngvesson
@Henrik.Yngvesson Рік тому
Good to know I wasn't the only one 🤣
@jnawk83
@jnawk83 Рік тому
Real Civil Engineer would be very proud.
@korona277
@korona277 Рік тому
Rock hard orbit
@aemrt5745
@aemrt5745 Рік тому
Orbital Mechanics has become much more complex (and cooler) than what I studied in the 1980s!
@andrewharrison8436
@andrewharrison8436 Рік тому
At a high level this makes sense. At a detail level of actual calculations it's a nightmare of instabilities and corrections and changing coordinates between earth, moon and sun. Glad someone else is doing the number crunching.
@Sacto1654
@Sacto1654 Рік тому
Modern computers can do the hard work of navigating for such a complicated flight.
@DJWILDCARD46
@DJWILDCARD46 Рік тому
Scott, excellent work! Very informative for me personally!! Some i's dotted, some t's crossed, so thank you!! 👌 🚀 Fly safe!! 🙏
@Lew114
@Lew114 Рік тому
I've been curious about this for my entire life. I never thought it was something I could understand. Thank you so much Scott! You are an amazing teacher.
@themollerz
@themollerz Рік тому
Amazeballs video mate. I learned a new level in my education on orbital mechanics. So cool.
@robertoler3795
@robertoler3795 Рік тому
well done. tracking these satellites has required an upscaling of my orbital dynamics and this is a great discussion/explanation hope the flying is going well. RGO
@edbelbruno1
@edbelbruno1 Рік тому
Fabulous video and explanation! Loved it! Thank you Edward Belbruno
@tijm6140
@tijm6140 Рік тому
Bravo, Scott! One of your best explanations.
@Cattactular
@Cattactular Рік тому
Wow, Scott, I’ve always had a trouble getting my head around body influences, until you explained langrange points like a topological map and it blew my mind, thank you so much.
@jfobear1953
@jfobear1953 Рік тому
This video contains some of the best illustrations and explanations of Lagrange points and orbital mechanics that I’ve ever encountered. Thanks!
@EddieA907
@EddieA907 Рік тому
Nothing like a fantastic orbital trajectory vid. Awesome, thank u sir!
@stevenswapp4768
@stevenswapp4768 Рік тому
This stuff is so cool! It's become perhaps my favorite area of space/science. Thank you Scott, we are all lucky you know this so well. Fly safe!
@MonKeed5E
@MonKeed5E Рік тому
This is a great example on how to do terrific outreach, kudos to Scott. I am a PhD Candidate at Politecnico di Milano, Italy, and at the Deep-space Astrodynamics Research and Technology (DART) group we are currently researching on how to engineer the ballistic capture mechanism for autonomous interplanetary CubeSats with limited onboard resources. We have released in open access on Zenodo a dataset of initial conditions granting temporary capture at Mars in case you are interested!
@druspork7737
@druspork7737 Рік тому
Fabulous work, really clear. 😊
@aurelienyonrac
@aurelienyonrac Рік тому
That is realy well explained. Thank you kind Sir
@unvergebeneid
@unvergebeneid Рік тому
Somehow the video title gave me "The 10 Best Lunar Transfer Orbits and Number 8 Might Surprise You" vibes 😄
@peterhall6656
@peterhall6656 Рік тому
To really understand this stuff you need to have some background iin KAM theory (Kolmogorov- Arnold-Moser ) in the context of dynamical systems. Helmut Hofer has done some good Princeton IAS videos on the technical issues in the context of explaining what Ed Belbruno did with the Hiten probe and the concept of ballistic capture. Ed was one of Jurgen Moser's students. Dynamical system stuff is pretty deep - according to Helmut when Ed came up with his idea of saving Hiten many of his colleagues said he was nuts but his ideas worked.
@robokuni
@robokuni Рік тому
Nice video, but you got a few things wrong. 0:19 Hakuto-R is a landing demonstration programme. The lander is simply called Series 1. The rover is Rashid and is a payload here. 12:00 Hiten is MUSES-A yes, but the smaller satellite is Hagoromo. It's not actually known if Hagoromo made it into orbit because the antennae failed and they were unable to verify its orbit :(. MUSES-B is a radio telescope satellite, not a part of the Hiten mission.
@PsychoMuffinSDM
@PsychoMuffinSDM Рік тому
Wow... just as I feel I am starting to make my way up the second mountain, Scott Manley firmly puts me back onto the first mountain of the Dunning-Kruger peaks. Thank you for teaching us these awesome things!
@rpaulcelso
@rpaulcelso Рік тому
As I watched the video, I wondered if you would get around to giving Ed Belbruno the credit he deserves. I was the Lunar GAS system engineer, Kerry Nock was the project leader, so I saw genius at work. Ed explained the math to me in the hall at JPL. I am still in awe.
@DimensionO
@DimensionO Рік тому
Thanks for the lowdown, Scott! Hello from Vandenberg Space Force Base!
@richjohnson8261
@richjohnson8261 Рік тому
Thank you for this video. I have been wanting to better understand how the vehicles get into orbits and transfer to other orbits since the Artemis 1 mission.
@WillArtie
@WillArtie Рік тому
Love this type of vid from Scott!!! xxx
@tanakaobi
@tanakaobi Рік тому
This was brilliantly explained! TYSM!
@kainpwnsu
@kainpwnsu Рік тому
How timely! I started learning in ernest about Lagrange, yesterday. This is a fantastic example! Fly safe. :)
@Nexfero
@Nexfero Рік тому
Using L1 & L2, LaGrange Points for a Ballistic slowdown into lunar orbit is a neat idea. 🚀🌙
@jj4791
@jj4791 Рік тому
Better idea: Build a lunar roadhouse vacation space-station orbiting earth between the moon at the L1 point, then change the rules for the pool area.
@johnkeck
@johnkeck Рік тому
Very understandable explanation, thank you, Scott!
@glenwoodriverresidentsgrou136
@glenwoodriverresidentsgrou136 Рік тому
Wow, well done. You answered my question! Great video.
@shanieboi86
@shanieboi86 Рік тому
This is brilliant Scott thanks.
@cheesypumpernickel5568
@cheesypumpernickel5568 Рік тому
Awesome explanation, thank you Scott!
@PTuffduty
@PTuffduty Рік тому
I listened to everything that you said. all very interesting. I am writing to commend you for your interest and understanding of all things space and for helping us mere mortals grasp the details.
@JohnJohansen2
@JohnJohansen2 Рік тому
I don't remember any explanation this intuitive, ever!👍👍👍
@markolson4660
@markolson4660 Рік тому
Great explanation of a complicated subject!
@eshafto
@eshafto Рік тому
Brilliant explanation. Thanks so much.
@mskellyrlv
@mskellyrlv Рік тому
Excellent video! I wondered about the Artemis mission timeline from the moment I first saw it published - since I remember hearing about Sputnik, and remember watching Vanguard 1 fall back and explode on the pad, am an Apollo junkie, and have been in the space game ever since. My very favorite book of any genre is Richard Battin's "An Introduction to the Methods and Mathematics of Astrodynamics", and despite its deep mathematical insights, it contains nothing of this sophistication. Thank you so much for this one, Mr. Manley!
@miltonmiller
@miltonmiller Рік тому
This was one of the most interesting videos about space exploration i've seen!
@MarkWelch
@MarkWelch Рік тому
I learned quite a bit from this video. Thank you for all this.
@GiovanniV69
@GiovanniV69 6 місяців тому
Universe Sandbox is really amazing! Great video!
@alexs36zero
@alexs36zero Рік тому
I saw many Apollo lunar landing profiles like the one at 0:43 drawn on walls in many cities. Never knew taggers are such space fans.
@bermchasin
@bermchasin Місяць тому
KSP fans everywhere!
@literyAZ09
@literyAZ09 Рік тому
Thank you very much for this explanation!
@kentd4762
@kentd4762 Рік тому
Thank you, Scott!
@epincion
@epincion Рік тому
Brilliant talk thanks Scott
@calvincheney7405
@calvincheney7405 Рік тому
That was good Scott, comprehendible~
@gerardoconnor4278
@gerardoconnor4278 Рік тому
Very good explanatory video. Thank you.
@Damien.D
@Damien.D Рік тому
Once clearly explained like this, surfing on gravitational forces seems pretty intuitive. I hope KSP2 will have some kind of n-body simulation. That would be so much fun to improvise a last resort trajectory around a L point to prevent Jeb being slingshoted towards the sun. Er. I mean.... that would be so much intellectual satisfaction to carefully plan in advance complex missions using such gravitational tricks. Of course.
@backwashjoe7864
@backwashjoe7864 Рік тому
LOL!
@matthenekk
@matthenekk Рік тому
It’s honestly amazing that at 26 I basically grew up in a world where n-body simulations are trivial. I know about this stuff, but every time I hear about more of the specifics of how this stuff actually works the more it’s incredible anybody not only solved 3+ body problems by hand, but that we figured out how to make computers solve them for us. The more you learn about engineering the more you realize how insanely unbelievably useful computers have been for science. It’s not all about social media lol. The speed of computation allows brute force methods like this. You would spend a million lifetimes solving 10,000 4 body problems by hand, but nasa supercomputers can back date probably a million possibilities in a reasonable amount of time and we have these orbits that basically just would be incomprehensible without computers. We have the knowledge to understand the process without computers, we just don’t have the power to calculate that fast as humans.
@blaizerhodes
@blaizerhodes Рік тому
Very informative.. thank you.
@seedmole
@seedmole Рік тому
Taking advantage of the highly-complex locations where a minute bit of thrust can produce massive differences in trajectory. Simply brilliant.
@bjdefilippo447
@bjdefilippo447 Рік тому
Thanks! That was fascinating.
@garyengelman7867
@garyengelman7867 Рік тому
SUPER, frist time I’ve had a explanation that made sense. Nice job.
@SkorjOlafsen
@SkorjOlafsen Рік тому
Thanks for talking about this!
@velcroman98
@velcroman98 Рік тому
This was awesome! I don't think I could do the math, but you explained it perfectly.
@roros2512
@roros2512 Рік тому
this is really cool I had the opportunity to make a thesis related to this I could get to know a little about the work of belbruno and Ross (the green red images you showed) great job
@astra1653
@astra1653 Рік тому
You really are so good at distilling down complex concepts and serving them up in easily digested bites of information. In other words, you dumb it down real good so that even dodos like me can follow the plot. Kudos! No, seriously, this was a really good video. Make more!
@dichebach
@dichebach Рік тому
Really exciting stuff!
@nathanbishop6850
@nathanbishop6850 Рік тому
So good! Thanks for explaining this beyond-Kerbal idea with such detail and diagrams. Drinking wine at conferences paid off, surely this justifies a bit more?
@mibo747
@mibo747 Рік тому
Amazing explanation
@smacksman1
@smacksman1 Рік тому
Thank you for educating me.
@luckyirvin
@luckyirvin Рік тому
the amount of computation required for these lovely dances still blows my mind and the amount of wacky imagination required to conceive these orbits blows my mind out past pluto
@lachierox28
@lachierox28 Рік тому
More like this please Scott!
@AdiktdToLoli
@AdiktdToLoli Рік тому
i dont want to take anything away from this very great video explaining the complexity and challenges one takes to get to the moon... but that damn first picture.... XD
@stuart207
@stuart207 Рік тому
I learned something today, cheers 😊
@Karen_Baldwin.Composer.Pianist
@Karen_Baldwin.Composer.Pianist Рік тому
Happy Xmas Cousin Scott🎄☃️🎅
@walter2990
@walter2990 Рік тому
These types of discussions are WAY outside my pay grade, but I can still appreciate the thought & the amount of computations that it requires. Stay curious!
@Fantic156
@Fantic156 Рік тому
So well explained, thanks. 😜
@testseven6663
@testseven6663 Рік тому
So interesting one, thanks!
@jimday666
@jimday666 Рік тому
This was incredible!
@phildem414
@phildem414 Рік тому
Fascinating! 🤩
@AluVixapede
@AluVixapede Рік тому
Oooohh... I've actually been very interested in this!
@mikes2381
@mikes2381 Рік тому
Would've been nice to hear about this in any of my orbits or GNC classes. Lol. Though maybe I got through before this was much known. Welp. That's why I follow people like you Scott.
How To Send A Space Shuttle To The Moon
11:03
Scott Manley
Переглядів 749 тис.
What Makes Lagrange Points Special Locations In Space
13:31
Scott Manley
Переглядів 1,5 млн
Піхотинці - про потребу у людях
00:57
Суспільне Новини
Переглядів 738 тис.
Starship 30 Static Fire Test | SpaceX Boca Chica
2:14
NASASpaceflight
Переглядів 28 тис.
The Most Confusing Things About Spacecraft Orbits
11:08
Scott Manley
Переглядів 1 млн
What the Apollo 11 Site Looks Like Today
9:32
neo
Переглядів 4 млн
Before The First Nuke Exploded... It Imploded.
21:50
Scott Manley
Переглядів 347 тис.
The Dumbest Mistakes In Space Exploration
16:16
Scott Manley
Переглядів 1,6 млн
This Amazing View Of Saturn Is Impossible
10:48
Scott Manley
Переглядів 629 тис.
The 1940's Jet Engine That Became Star Wars Design History
9:05
Scott Manley
Переглядів 121 тис.
How A  Gold Bullet Almost Destroyed A Space Shuttle
11:25
Scott Manley
Переглядів 1,3 млн
Главная проблема iPad Pro M4 OLED!
13:04
THE ROCO
Переглядів 15 тис.
Broken Flex Repair #technology #mobilerepair
0:50
ideal institute aligarh
Переглядів 1,2 млн
iPhone - телефон для нищебродов?!
0:53
ÉЖИ АКСЁНОВ
Переглядів 3,7 млн
iPhone - телефон для нищебродов?!
0:53
ÉЖИ АКСЁНОВ
Переглядів 3,7 млн