Why SpaceX Built A Stainless Steel Starship

  Переглядів 4,914,168

Real Engineering

Real Engineering

5 років тому

Be one of the first 500 people to sign up with this link and get 20% off your subscription with Brilliant.org! brilliant.org/realengineering/
Thank you to www.spadre.com for footage of Starhopper construction.
New vlog channel: / @brianmcmanus
Patreon:
www.patreon.com/user?u=282505...
Facebook:
/ realengineering1
Instagram:
/ brianjamesmcmanus
Twitter:
/ thebrianmcmanus
Discord:
/ discord
Get your Real Engineering shirts at: standard.tv/collections/real-...
References
[1] www.wd40.com/cool-stuff/history
[2] goo.gl/6eyfsP
[3] www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-spa...
[4] www.sciencedirect.com/science...
[5] spaceflight101.com/msl/msl-aer...
[6]www.grantadesign.com/download/...
Extra Reading
www.totalmateria.com/page.asp...
ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...
www.thermopedia.com/content/1203/
Credits:
Narrator/Writer: Brian McManus
Editor: Stephanie Sammann (www.stephanie-sammann.com/)
Animator: Mike Ridolfi (www.moboxgraphics.com/)
Sound: Graham Haerther (haerther.net/)
Thumbnail: Simon Buckmaster / forgottentowel
Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com/creator
Songs:
Reversed Beginning - Luwaks
Clearer Views - From Now On
Particle Emission - Silver Maple
3house - Ooyy
Atomic Numbers 2 - August Wilhelmsson
Thank you to my patreon supporters: Adam Flohr, Henning Basma, Karl Andersson, Mark Govea, Hank Green, William Leu, Jason A., Chris Plays Games, Tristan Edwards, Ken Coltan, Andrew McCorkell, Ian Dundore, John & Becki Johnston. Nevin Spoljaric, Jason Clark, Christopher Lam, Deven Warren Rathbun.

КОМЕНТАРІ: 5 000
@RealEngineering
@RealEngineering 5 років тому
The daily problems on Brilliant are actually fantastic. Great way to challenge your brain each day. Thanks again to Brilliant for making these videos possible: brilliant.org/realengineering/
@Sednas
@Sednas 5 років тому
My previous comment was a shameful reference to am egotistical UKpostsr known as MaximilianMus, I no longer support that sad personality.
@jun1orIV
@jun1orIV 5 років тому
You are forgetting to approve the subs... I sent two subtitles months ago for the videos "Can We Terraform the Sahara to Stop Climate Change?" and "How We Will Colonise The Moon", and both still weren't published...
@billyboy1er
@billyboy1er 5 років тому
Your segways are so smooth, too smooth even ! It kinda makes you feel like the video is not over and lacks a conclusion sometimes ... Well that's the only critique i have, otherwise your content is amazing in terms of research, animation, narration etc. Keep it up man, your work is just ... Brilliant ;)
@Valansch
@Valansch 5 років тому
I will not, ever, sign up to brilliant.
@engrsmukhtar
@engrsmukhtar 5 років тому
You need to patent such a brilliant fluid transition to the ad section.
@seq165432
@seq165432 5 років тому
Would it not be ironically hilarious if the Mars spaceship ends up looking EXACTLY like the 'absurd' spaceships of 1950's space movies? :)
@greenbanana311
@greenbanana311 5 років тому
Yes, if you were to stretch the definition of "*extremely hilarious*" to an absurd degree.
@kenoliver8913
@kenoliver8913 5 років тому
Those 'absurd' spaceships looked like the V2 because people's idea of a big rocket was the V2. By 2001 (the movie) a big rocket in the movies looked like the space shuttle. What's the betting that if Space X succeeds then Hollywood's ideas will shift again ..
@komradewirelesscaller6716
@komradewirelesscaller6716 4 роки тому
Yes your so right that would be pretty ironic and humorous. Or even like some of the spaceships from the old Flash Gordan serials.
@flatstuff1630
@flatstuff1630 4 роки тому
Pretty sure you don't understand the full import of your question /statement. Try and think about it in reverse.
@rickduffy8929
@rickduffy8929 4 роки тому
Buck Rodgers in the 22nd century! Lol I think the incredibles have a similar design :o
@kebabkev
@kebabkev 4 роки тому
Elon stares at Starship for a moment. "Tell you what, throw a little hot rod red in there".
@oakwhelie
@oakwhelie 4 роки тому
it makes the rocket fly FASTA
@hobbit1817
@hobbit1817 3 роки тому
Like tony stark with his iron man suit
@Novadababy
@Novadababy 3 роки тому
Well He is tony stark
@thrasher2344
@thrasher2344 3 роки тому
Or Tony Stark is Elon
@rohanahlawat5809
@rohanahlawat5809 3 роки тому
This is not the marvel universe. Grow up.
@brandontea3815
@brandontea3815 4 роки тому
The sweating part is really really smart. Makes me believe that the best engineering is to copy nature.
@AverageBrethren
@AverageBrethren 4 роки тому
we are biological machines if you think about it. maybe nature is the peak of engineering
@gdash6925
@gdash6925 4 роки тому
@@AverageBrethren nature is gods gift and its our mission to to look at it and use it. Ki nda like a graph going closer to infinity
@A3ATOT
@A3ATOT 4 роки тому
Sweating fuel while in fire, is not really a good idea
@dm5802
@dm5802 4 роки тому
It is.
@loveisthemostpowerfulforce1397
@loveisthemostpowerfulforce1397 4 роки тому
Sounds like what Nikola Tesla said "“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”"
@dhupee
@dhupee 4 роки тому
"The Falcon 9 certified for human payload is a bit of a nightmare" Me: NOT ANYMORE!!
@banned2911
@banned2911 4 роки тому
Daffa Haj Tsaqif im so happy
@Wulthrin
@Wulthrin 4 роки тому
best thing to happen in 2020
@ralanham76
@ralanham76 4 роки тому
They did it
@defencebangladesh4068
@defencebangladesh4068 3 роки тому
yes
@drabberfrog
@drabberfrog 3 роки тому
I watch the launch It was so cool
@TheScienceBiome
@TheScienceBiome 5 років тому
Your thumbnail game is *so* strong.
@Psrj-ad
@Psrj-ad 5 років тому
@wall wall yes
@jumpjetterz5818
@jumpjetterz5818 5 років тому
no his game is SOLID...😂😂😂😂
@christopherrhodes3228
@christopherrhodes3228 5 років тому
With his thumbnails, he could play marbles on a competitive level!
@FutureNow
@FutureNow 5 років тому
+1
@samuellittle1286
@samuellittle1286 5 років тому
Word is bond.
@danievdw
@danievdw 5 років тому
You missed the real important bit. " Most steel alloys get brittle at cryogenic temperatures. That’s not the case for stainless steel with high chrome-nickel content. It gets stronger in cold conditions, but it also maintains ductility. That means stainless steel has high fracture toughness, which could prevent small structural imperfections from developing into cracks." With the cryo fuel loaded, that thin sheet of steel is stronger than carbon fiber, on top of all the other stuff you mentioned.
@surronzak8154
@surronzak8154 5 років тому
" It gets stronger in cold conditions, but it also maintains ductility." nope, it loose ductility slower than steel , and don't get stronger when cold.
@danievdw
@danievdw 5 років тому
@@surronzak8154 ..nah, I think I will believe the metallurgists and rocket engineers that is actually using this, over some UKposts know it all.
@surronzak8154
@surronzak8154 5 років тому
@@danievdw where doese it say that it will be stronger when cold ? By the way I'm IWT metalurgist using stainless steel everyday, I know the KV for those materials ;-)
@danievdw
@danievdw 5 років тому
@@surronzak8154 Yeah, my mum was lead design on NCC-1701-B . Stop being lazy as well, do some research yourself. Plenty of info available on it, especially after SpaceX started using it.
@surronzak8154
@surronzak8154 5 років тому
@@danievdw LMAO youdon't know what you are talking about buddy
@loganthesaint
@loganthesaint 4 роки тому
I love how Elon is pushing new ideas, and failure together. Because success without failure is just luck lol.
@crisangle8592
@crisangle8592 4 роки тому
"I love how Elon is pushing new ideas, and failure together. Because success without failure is just luck lol. " better not while i was driving on freeway
@ihihihihi.heheh.
@ihihihihi.heheh. 4 роки тому
Funny it's true
@lemarthomas7647
@lemarthomas7647 4 роки тому
That's the true and only way that we are going to get out of this mess,of an World, That these 😵 Scientist created, The Carovi19!..
@lemarthomas7647
@lemarthomas7647 4 роки тому
Super MaN 💪 Bro..
@ihihihihi.heheh.
@ihihihihi.heheh. 4 роки тому
@Bilal Khalid holy fuck. You are really dumb!
@alwinvillero4404
@alwinvillero4404 3 роки тому
2020: the tin can now exists and even launched once
@Rauruatreides
@Rauruatreides 3 роки тому
Late 2020: Tin can evolved into an 80s spaceship and flew.
@JayPatel-ug1nh
@JayPatel-ug1nh 3 роки тому
@@Rauruatreides Early 2021 : SN8 and SN9 did a spectacular flight, but RUD on landing. Waiting fro SN10 to fly and nail landing!
@julittok
@julittok 3 роки тому
Late 2039: Nuclear winter took over after USA and China released their nukes over a struggle for world domination. 2043: We are surviving on scraps, communications with surviving groups have been decreasing worldwide. 2049: I'm down to my last can of expired beans, the rest of the world is silent. Four starlink satellites are still operational, they allowed me to send this message. Late 2049: We weren't worthy of this planet, i'm so sorry.
@corrick4339
@corrick4339 3 роки тому
@@JayPatel-ug1nh sn10 stuck the landing! And then exploded!
@luckuijken5451
@luckuijken5451 3 роки тому
Mid 2021, tin can landed and survived!
@Svitman
@Svitman 5 років тому
Starhopper - the test article Starship - the actual thing that goes to Mars
@_aullik
@_aullik 5 років тому
well starship will got to the moon. Then a revised version will eventually go to the mars.
@maxschmieder232
@maxschmieder232 5 років тому
Thank you!
@christopherrhodes3228
@christopherrhodes3228 5 років тому
Starlord, the pilot
@BetterThanYouXuD
@BetterThanYouXuD 5 років тому
Starwars - the entertainment
@DrewLSsix
@DrewLSsix 5 років тому
Svitman As often as plans change its foolish to say something with such certainty.
@evaristegalois6282
@evaristegalois6282 5 років тому
Other scientists: “Let’s colonize Mars” Elon Musk: “Yeah, let’s colonize Mars, but first: Meme 👏 Review 👏"
@jerponemyce9497
@jerponemyce9497 5 років тому
Found you again
@pug2858
@pug2858 5 років тому
Mars👏Review👏
@diegoviniciomejiaquesada4754
@diegoviniciomejiaquesada4754 5 років тому
Evariste Galois over 85 millions subscribers on PewDiePie channel... 0.1 $ per subscriber = 8.5$ millions... enough to invest in Space X and help Elon reach Mars.
@chimergo6501
@chimergo6501 5 років тому
But Ellon isn't scientist, he only "crazy" businessman ...
@pug2858
@pug2858 5 років тому
@@diegoviniciomejiaquesada4754 but it cost 1 bil to reach the moon so we need 5$ for every 9yr old. 85Mx5=425M enough to book probably a couple of seats
@1Deejay7
@1Deejay7 4 роки тому
Flex tape. Problem solved. Rocket made entirely out of Flex tape.
@davidmok108
@davidmok108 4 роки тому
Hogwarts: You want a scholarship boi?
@jkoeberlein1
@jkoeberlein1 4 роки тому
Freaking brilliant!
@aerojetrocketdyners-2538
@aerojetrocketdyners-2538 4 роки тому
someone needs to publish the heat properties of flex tape.
@nathanielrobb6973
@nathanielrobb6973 4 роки тому
This is beyond a lot of damage
@banned2911
@banned2911 4 роки тому
89 Alpha who are you so wise in the way of sience?
@ItsaDigitalHamster
@ItsaDigitalHamster 3 роки тому
Real Engineering: Sometimes you just need to make mistakes to learn, which is why you should sign up to Brilliant. People who sign up to Brilliant: lol won't do that again
@willkaporis7958
@willkaporis7958 3 роки тому
janet lopz I think you’re in the wrong comment section
@AQDuck
@AQDuck 3 роки тому
@@willkaporis7958 It's obviously a bot, just report it
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 5 років тому
Origin of "WD-40" - I honestly never knew that before!
@wildman2012
@wildman2012 5 років тому
And apparently, it really was the 40th time they tried the formulation before they found the one that worked.
@HuntingTarg
@HuntingTarg 5 років тому
Water Dispersant formula # 40. Along with Heinz 57.
@ronschlorff7089
@ronschlorff7089 5 років тому
@@wildman2012 It's just Science 101: "If at first you don't succeed...…"
@stastavross3330
@stastavross3330 5 років тому
WD40
@JohnNugroho
@JohnNugroho 5 років тому
Mindblown
@KarlssonF
@KarlssonF 5 років тому
_"where stainless steel shines"_ *see what you did there*
@AQDuck
@AQDuck 5 років тому
I wonder if Starship will use Chrome OS...
@haoteng2823
@haoteng2823 5 років тому
Pvt. Duckling Nah. It will use android.
@Keldor314
@Keldor314 5 років тому
@@AQDuck Stainless steel is in fact made by alloying chrome into regular steel. ;-)
@justADeni
@justADeni 5 років тому
@@Keldor314 Thats the fucking joke everyone knows that
@Keldor314
@Keldor314 5 років тому
@@justADeni I thought it might be. OR it might have been a reference to the shiny part. Covering the bases.
@thalescarl1589
@thalescarl1589 3 роки тому
Here we are. Days before SN9 takes off. I hope it could land perfectly this time.
@adamunderhay8347
@adamunderhay8347 3 роки тому
weeks* lol
@mikethespike056
@mikethespike056 3 роки тому
RIP
@thalescarl1589
@thalescarl1589 3 роки тому
I guess it is rest in pieces now unfortunately. But sn10 will land in one piece, I hope.
@mikethespike056
@mikethespike056 3 роки тому
@@thalescarl1589 I told you it should land in one piece, not that you should bring me one!
@Br0nson_0
@Br0nson_0 3 роки тому
@@thalescarl1589 oh oh
@cheeseninja1115
@cheeseninja1115 3 роки тому
I like coming back to this video to see just how far SpaceX has grown in such a short time, not just for a space company but just a company in general!
@johnterpack3940
@johnterpack3940 5 років тому
The ship looks like nothing else... unless you grew up watching '50s sci-fi.
@mroldnewbie
@mroldnewbie 4 роки тому
Could be funny if they paint it red: en.tintin.com/images/tintin/albums/16marcheLune/C16%2025%20B%20COLOR_en.jpg
@joseinfante5054
@joseinfante5054 3 роки тому
This is not a ship, this is a Havana cigar hungry for fuel and slow as snails, I bet it won't even go to the moon, much less 58 million Klm to Mars. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
@one2toomany
@one2toomany 4 роки тому
"There's no oil on Mars" The American government has lost interest.
@briancarlson6216
@briancarlson6216 4 роки тому
well people once thought Alaska was useless so who knows there might be larger reserves there than on earth
@FrVitoBe
@FrVitoBe 4 роки тому
@@briancarlson6216 galaxy war 1 inc
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae 4 роки тому
sends orbiter to Titan for hydrocarbon exploration
@DonTiberius35
@DonTiberius35 4 роки тому
Might not be oil but plenty of other materials
@jamesbizs
@jamesbizs 4 роки тому
why do people think it's just america that cares about oil lol Kinda like how everyone thought it was just America that had slaves, when the reality was, America had a tiny tiny percentage of all slaves.
@JNDlego57
@JNDlego57 3 роки тому
“Failure is an option here. If you’re not failing, you’re not innovating enough.” - Elon Musk
@kstar1489
@kstar1489 3 роки тому
Unless he’s putting actual people in it
@natthaphonhongcharoen
@natthaphonhongcharoen 3 роки тому
@@kstar1489 That's why it's a good thing to fail as many time as he needs while he still can
@doodleboi7034
@doodleboi7034 2 роки тому
*Soviets Intensifies*
@HalNordmann
@HalNordmann 2 роки тому
To me, SpaceX's "rapid prototyping" via blowing up tanks in a field with bits soldered to them seems more like messing up. Even NASA in its glory days with a nearly blank-cheque budget didn't have so many explosions!
@dolphinboi-playmonsterranc9668
@dolphinboi-playmonsterranc9668 2 роки тому
"The key to success is slavery"-Elon Musk
@dbannerman9488
@dbannerman9488 4 роки тому
0:09 that fox is a classic image
@lsemenov
@lsemenov 5 років тому
My Soviet university "diploma work" back in 1987 was to test this type of cooling for rocket re-entry, porous pressed metal powder was used, however there were problems with incostintent gas flow in different parts of provided samples. Hopefully perforated solid metal will work better than baked together particles, I really hope such protection is possible (although not 100% sure), only tests will show.
@lsemenov
@lsemenov 5 років тому
@BRAVOZULU DWEST boathouse I don't think it's possible to calculate these things precisely because of nature of turbulence, it is not really predictable and may create very local effects when one part of rocket will be heated much more than other part. That's why tests are still necessary. That's why wind tunnels are still used. However, it's hard to replicate all conditions of re-entry in wind tunnel, SpaceX is right to build cheap test rocket.
@HuntingTarg
@HuntingTarg 5 років тому
I think the biggest challenge will be with the baffle diffuser 'heat shield' that the methane will flow through; there will be cryogenic methane on one side and high-pressure semi-ionized hypervelocity gas on the other. This will create a high thermal gradient across the baffle plates, and I am not sure if anything short of an actual flight test will prove/disprove this approach. If it fails, it could doom Starship and jeopardize SpaceX's investment funding. If it performs as designed, we enter a new era in spaceflight and human exploration.
@lsemenov
@lsemenov 5 років тому
@@HuntingTarg I wish I knew what kind of heat protection is used by the newest breed of Russian nuclear hypersonic gliders, yes they are disposable but still may use similar method to keep hot plasma from surface of metal, I know that Soviet Union worked on that long time ago. Although metal still will be heated by light but this is not the same as direct contact. The goal is to make gas cushion between plasma and metal. I doubt that methane is the best candidate, perhaps helium or some other inert gas that will not react with metal.
@HuntingTarg
@HuntingTarg 5 років тому
@@lsemenov under correct conditions a high-pressure high-flow gas boundary layer will form between the plasma and outer spaceframe skin. I wouldn't rely on that exclusively to protect a metal or composite frame though. A cryogenic fluid (Helium, Argon, Nitrogen) in an open-loop boil-off cooling system is conceivable, although I don't know of an example where that's been tested.
@snakeslither8831
@snakeslither8831 5 років тому
cOmMiE
@spinor
@spinor 5 років тому
Just so you know, "Starhopper" is the test vehicle currently being built. The actual thing will be called "Starship" and the booster "Super Heavy".
@LordEvrey
@LordEvrey 5 років тому
Also, Starhopper with the old tip was only about 2/3 the size of Starship.
@Christopher28fair
@Christopher28fair 5 років тому
I thought BFR was great. Versatile.
@subwarpspeed
@subwarpspeed 5 років тому
Yes thanks for someone correcting that. It stains the work and knowledge he puts into the video when failing to properly name it. One starts to question other stuff then too.
@DrewLSsix
@DrewLSsix 5 років тому
“Will be”. As often as plans change I wouldn’t count on it.
@_Andrew2002
@_Andrew2002 5 років тому
@@Christopher28fair It was but people kept changing Falcon to the F word. You can't have 8 year olds interested in space if the most powerful rocket ever built uses vulgur in it
@ckck519
@ckck519 3 роки тому
As someone who works in Aerospace Metals I love these videos. Can you make a video on Nickel Alloys in Aerospace? Or perhaps Cobalt alloys!
@fightwithbiomechanix663
@fightwithbiomechanix663 4 роки тому
Can I just say you're a major reason I am getting a Certificate in Data Science and a Masters in Material Science & Engineering. Thank you!!!
@jasonfireshield6134
@jasonfireshield6134 5 років тому
The first liquid cooled rocket better have RGB
@lober_pancake9196
@lober_pancake9196 5 років тому
Jasonfireshield yea
@SteveVi0lence
@SteveVi0lence 5 років тому
*KGB
@shockwave2291
@shockwave2291 5 років тому
Especially because it makes it go faster.
@dwutlenekwodoru9692
@dwutlenekwodoru9692 5 років тому
zygmunt szymanski hahaha, Cejrowski wszedł mocno
@dannydaw59
@dannydaw59 5 років тому
What's RGB?
@sheaedwards1999
@sheaedwards1999 5 років тому
Another amazing video again! Been a long time viewer and can say this channel is one of the reasons i'm studying engineering now
@nedimlapo1582
@nedimlapo1582 5 років тому
I can relate, I now want to study mechanical engineering with focus on motors and vehicles. I always admired electric cars and would love to work on developing better ones in the future. There are no car production companies in my country so that definitely means I would have to move somewhere else but it is worth it I suppose...
@qadarinimo258
@qadarinimo258 5 років тому
Nedim Lapo what about automotive engineering that’s all about cars 🚘
@nedimlapo1582
@nedimlapo1582 5 років тому
@@qadarinimo258 My mechanical engineering university has only 2 options, computer engineering and product design, and I literally can't see the difference between them, both of them have same subjects...
@qadarinimo258
@qadarinimo258 5 років тому
I wanna study aerospace engineering
@thishadowithin
@thishadowithin 5 років тому
I was interested in the field but, honestly, it got super boring unless I could hold a laser and zap something lol
@viktormikhaltsevich7400
@viktormikhaltsevich7400 4 роки тому
Amazing content and good material knowledge! Another interesting consideration is application of torsional loads unto the material as Kepler's laws take over. This certainly makes isotropic materials like SS a preferred choice, at least until we can improve composite material science to respond equally well to compound forces. However, there will always be limitations associated with substrate selection for various coatings/shielding, especially as their CTEs vary and internal strain is created. Looking forward to other videos!
@MikeMiller-fc2cc
@MikeMiller-fc2cc 4 роки тому
What you said about WD-40 is true, It was deloped by Aerosol systems, I used to work there
@shawnbarrett4540
@shawnbarrett4540 4 роки тому
I thought it was about driving moisture out of the electronics, not the bodies? Or was that just an unexpected benefit?
@datgio4951
@datgio4951 4 роки тому
Mike Miller ok boomer
@hyperion3704
@hyperion3704 4 роки тому
@@datgio4951 OK Loser
@oldmate6380
@oldmate6380 4 роки тому
what is the formula
@stanleyhipkiss4690
@stanleyhipkiss4690 4 роки тому
@@datgio4951 and what glorious generation do you hail from
@Fairman25
@Fairman25 5 років тому
Rule 1 of engineering: MORE TRIANGLES!!!
@SLEEPYJK
@SLEEPYJK 5 років тому
Don't be silly, that's Rule 3
@sMOS_arms
@sMOS_arms 5 років тому
rule 1 is actually "more circles". Since round forms can do a lot better against pressure than other figures. This is why our submarines, spaceships, bunkers, tunnels are all rounded :)
@pchurch4973
@pchurch4973 5 років тому
Civil engineering
@syntaxusdogmata3333
@syntaxusdogmata3333 5 років тому
LOL... thanks, Euclid! 😏
@ivanrodionov9724
@ivanrodionov9724 5 років тому
@@sMOS_arms what about a relaux triangle?
@lifesimulator3964
@lifesimulator3964 5 років тому
"The thing literally fell over in the wind" Mars, 2020 Astronaut 1: I'm gonna get the tools from the rocket. Astronaut 2: Sure, go ahead. *heads outside Astronaut 1: Where's the feckin' rocket!? I just parked it right here!
@thinkabout288
@thinkabout288 5 років тому
LOL
@_aullik
@_aullik 5 років тому
The winds in the strongest Martian storms top out at about 60 miles per hour with an atmospheric density of 1% of earths atmosphere. So I would be surprised if this can happen on mars.
@oliver6496
@oliver6496 5 років тому
It's a joke.
@theuncalledfor
@theuncalledfor 5 років тому
@@oliver6496 Jokes usually work best when they have some basis in reality. When examined, this one turns out to be just stupid. I'm sure everyone here knows it's a joke, we just don't all agree that it's a good one.
@thinkabout288
@thinkabout288 5 років тому
@@oliver6496 and a good one
@djskizzle1
@djskizzle1 4 роки тому
thanks for sharing! "end your day a little smarter" love it
@wadesharp11
@wadesharp11 4 роки тому
Il remember this when i build my next space ship!! Thanks
@kevdalev
@kevdalev 5 років тому
Everyday Astronaut beat you on this topic, but I still watched this whole thing because your videos are just so good!
@rounakmahato67866
@rounakmahato67866 5 років тому
No way. This one is much better & to the point than everyday astronaut's long & boring video
@darkamagumo716
@darkamagumo716 5 років тому
@@rounakmahato67866 his video was more entertaining than this lol
@petlahk4119
@petlahk4119 5 років тому
@@rounakmahato67866 - I agree. I can't stand everyday astronaut because I think his content is lackluster, roundabout, and poorly thought-out. I know that Scott Manley and Everyday Engineering on the other hand take their research seriously as they sometimes talk about other things they've learned while doing research or the books they've used to do research. (And they don't frequently write and speak really bad sentences...)
@AnhTrieu90
@AnhTrieu90 5 років тому
There is no such thing as too much rocket. I could watch these videos all day without being bored.
@Crushnaut
@Crushnaut 5 років тому
Scott Manly was all over this topic months ago when the first pictures came out.
@uaEquals42
@uaEquals42 5 років тому
Correction or note: It was only the fairing that toppled over. The bottom half with all the tanks, plumbing, etc stayed upright.
@mirkokvesic1598
@mirkokvesic1598 5 років тому
I only crashed half of my car, the trunk stayed untouched. Do you think I can sell it as half crashed? Asking for a friend :P
@_aullik
@_aullik 5 років тому
@@mirkokvesic1598 Do you have cover over your car that can be attacked? Imagine that getting blown away by the wind. It can be repaired without major problems. I mean they build it in a week in the first place.
@uaEquals42
@uaEquals42 5 років тому
@@mirkokvesic1598 A better analogy is that a cargo carrier on top of a car falls off. The car will still drive.
@PD-we8vf
@PD-we8vf 5 років тому
There is no plumbing in it. It is a set prop.
@Charles-fc9gi
@Charles-fc9gi 5 років тому
uaEquals42 the thing just detaches from the wind, sure, the structure will be fine when it enters mars. Elon Musk is a genious... Even nasa during the space race when there wasnt a lot of knowledge about spacetravel, even then they didnt have these kind of failures. Nasa tested everything and made a lot of stupid failures, but not this level of failure. I think if a normal, less ambitious person would leas spacex, they would accomplish much more, elon musk just wants to much, and often the things he want are just too early, science is not prepared yet.
@engineer9528
@engineer9528 4 роки тому
By far my best video in Real Engineering Channel :) Thank you!
@leslireimers708
@leslireimers708 4 роки тому
I agreed with everything you said. But you did not seem to want to replay. So much fun. I am always here for you!
@Aeronaut1975
@Aeronaut1975 5 років тому
I'm British, so know you're talking in Celsius, but when you're talking about numbers in Degrees, you should always specify whether Fahrenheit, Celsius or Kelvin. The first rule of Engineering is "Name your units".
@jerrb7991
@jerrb7991 5 років тому
Kelvin is not a degree, in fact writing °K is a mistake. So the confusion can be only between Celsius and Fahrenheit. So in the non-retarded measurements units part of the world degrees are only Celsius, so no confusion at all
@stefanvdw7895
@stefanvdw7895 5 років тому
mezsh In space units that are used are metric. Not imperial. Should be pretty obvious
@spinor
@spinor 5 років тому
@@stefanvdw7895 you'd be surprised...
@Aeronaut1975
@Aeronaut1975 5 років тому
@@stefanvdw7895 When it comes to science and Engineering, one should never make assumptions. Remember the Mars Climate Oribiter?! Just name your units, whether it's obvious or not, then there's no confusion...
@EvitoCruor
@EvitoCruor 5 років тому
Enlightened Doggo You do realize it was done in a year when measuring the temperature with one Kelvin accuracy was considered good?
@SevenDeMagnus
@SevenDeMagnus 5 років тому
They actually let the carbon fiber tank explode to know it's maximum limit. It didn't fail.
@vavra222
@vavra222 4 роки тому
hey, might as well get the most out of it, if you cant really use it.. at least the info will be useful when and if we can manufacture CF more easily
@geraldhenrickson7472
@geraldhenrickson7472 4 роки тому
Interesting...good to know.
@tylercobb8293
@tylercobb8293 4 роки тому
Yeah I would say that too to keep investors xD
@tylercobb8293
@tylercobb8293 4 роки тому
@@Chamieiniibet it was joke. 😁
@LeeMaitland
@LeeMaitland 4 роки тому
Mate what a fantastic video, really well explained and I love the isogrid idea.
@entropyz5242
@entropyz5242 3 роки тому
One year later and it has worked
@Dragon029
@Dragon029 5 років тому
There's a couple of errors or misconception in the video and one key part brushed over: 1. "Starhopper" is just the nickname of the test vehicle being built in Texas; it has this name because when SpaceX were testing the software and systems required to perform landings with the Falcon 9 they built a short version of a Falcon 9 (with just 1 Merlin engine) which was called Grasshopper. The actual rocket that's going to Mars is called "Starship" as a whole, with the upper stage bearing the same name and the booster (which is only necessary for getting Starship off of Earth's surface) being called Superheavy (as a spiritual step-up from Falcon Heavy). 2. The Starhopper vehicle being built in Texas is not the same height, weight, etc as Starship (just as Grasshopper didn't have the height, weight, etc of Falcon 9); rather it's just designed to test propulsion and the final stages of landing (being able to throttle the engine properly, have a reliable and rapid gimbal system, etc). They do have a very rough approximation of the final Starship's CG vs center of pressure with Starhopper, but it's only really rough data. There's also rumours that they might attempt a simulated mid-air engine-out, where the rocket would descend under 1 or 2 engines (instead of all 3 they're installing on Starhopper; Starship is currently planned to have 7 engines), likely at a tilted angle - engine-out redundancy is important for something that's envisioned to carry 100 people to Mars and (later) back. 3. They're also going to be building a full-scale prototype of Starship separately to Starhopper; this full scale prototype was meant to be under construction now at the Port of Los Angeles, but SpaceX didn't renew their lease and are moving construction to Texas, so there's likely not much in LA right now (that can't be moved by truck, rather than barge, to their new Texas facility). It's not clear whether this would be a vehicle that later turns into an operational vehicle, but that full scale prototype will actually test things like the aerodynamics of the rocket (including the special aerodynamic control surfaces, have the proper manufacturing techniques (such as those involved with the active cooling system), etc. Starhopper will get the control laws tuned into the ballpark, the Starship prototype will refine these to transport customer payloads and humans. 4. This is the key part you missed out - a lot of materials, such as carbon composites, aluminium and even many stainless steels, get weaker when they're subjected to the cryogenic temperatures experienced when being used to store -200C liquids. The specific stainless steel (a slight variant of 301 SS for the tanks, a slight variant of 310 SS for the heat shield outer wall) that SpaceX will be using however actually gets about 50% *stronger* when it experiences these temperatures. The combined cryo + hot strength advantages of steel has ended up resulting in the payload capacity of Starship rising compared to prior carbon composite-based plans.
@RaoulPathak
@RaoulPathak 5 років тому
Dragon029 Great information, thanks!
@astrofan8775
@astrofan8775 5 років тому
And that's why i like to - if he covers it - watch Scott Manley, as he tends to cover all of these seemingly less significant points, even if it results in a longer and harder to understand video, as he wants to mainly inform us to the best of his capabilitys. Luckily he did cover this already (actually surprisingly long ago) in some detail, mentioning all of these points (although not all of them to this detail, he expects us to get the starhopper/starship-stuff by just indicating it).
@HuntingTarg
@HuntingTarg 5 років тому
That is great information, and Scott Manley did cover most of that. It is just formatted like a wall-of-text. Sincerely; thx for posting.
@mrs.magnet2816
@mrs.magnet2816 5 років тому
can you be more specific
@ArtOfRuin981
@ArtOfRuin981 5 років тому
Legit.
@arshaghazie
@arshaghazie 5 років тому
not gonna lie, the sight of rocket landing is super cool
@johncoryell
@johncoryell 5 років тому
Thanks for being honest
@BlueJazzBoyNZ
@BlueJazzBoyNZ 4 роки тому
Thanks for the informed data exposition
@iamcarbonandotherbits.8039
@iamcarbonandotherbits.8039 4 роки тому
They couldn't decide on a colour for the ship, Then when the sun's rays hit it, Oooooohh Shiny, We like that, Sod the paint job.
@spike7112ify
@spike7112ify 4 роки тому
"Think like an engineer" dangerous words to say on the shop floor.
@BootlessDave
@BootlessDave 5 років тому
Space X: "I can build reusable rockets that land themselves on land or on water at the same time!" Wind: "Can i come?"
@toddhoward1498
@toddhoward1498 5 років тому
Landing rockets on the wind is a genius idea
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae 4 роки тому
Heh sad that they only recently figured out it was a bad idea to reuse rockets and thus had to figure out ways to rethink the dmg caused by rentry.
@belkys120
@belkys120 4 роки тому
BootlessDave : HAVE U EVER SEEN , ONE LAND .?? 😳😂🤣😂😳.....
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae
@Yor_gamma_ix_bae 4 роки тому
selling bad ideas is the best kind of entrepreneurship.
@0EEVV0
@0EEVV0 4 роки тому
@@Yor_gamma_ix_bae who's "they"?
@bos3707
@bos3707 4 роки тому
Very informative! Great content, thank you!
@squidwardfromua
@squidwardfromua Рік тому
I like how you explain their decisions just before SpaceX to change them
@kanva4
@kanva4 5 років тому
SpaceX is seriously a hot topic right now
@thishadowithin
@thishadowithin 5 років тому
So is Tesla. Lot's of skepticism how they're going to survive. Well, that and their solar city plans.
@Keldor314
@Keldor314 5 років тому
@@thishadowithin SpaceX came out of nowhere and is suddenly launching more than half of all American rockets, and more than a quarter of all rockets in the world. And since Falcon 9 is a medium to heavy lift vehicle, if you compare by payload capacity, the number goes to greater than 50% of the world. If more than half of new American made cars were Teslas, you'd darn right be talking about Telsa being wonderful too.
@thishadowithin
@thishadowithin 5 років тому
Keldor314 do you believe over half of America will drive a Tesla? They might want to not drive in Winter months. Doors that won't open and completely drained batteries in freezing weather. Not good.
@thishadowithin
@thishadowithin 5 років тому
Keldor314 oh and don't forget, his solar empire is collapsing. Double uh oh.
@forloop7713
@forloop7713 5 років тому
Spacex is profitable but tesla is not. Tesla is also government funded
@MrTattooASMR
@MrTattooASMR 5 років тому
SpaceX is killing it right now. I hope this works!
@ronschlorff7089
@ronschlorff7089 5 років тому
The words "space" and "killing" probably should not be used in the same sentence. Just say'n! :D
@24680kong
@24680kong 5 років тому
If Musk keeps forcing his engineers at this pace, that might be literal!
@ronschlorff7089
@ronschlorff7089 5 років тому
@@vonn1334 no thanks, I suppose you might be using your head right now, Mr. Richard Cranium! LOL.
@creamcheese6236
@creamcheese6236 4 роки тому
I'm glad space X is using steel. Those concepts just look so futuristic!
@jonathanflores3748
@jonathanflores3748 4 роки тому
Man, you're videos are awesome!! Keep it up!
@keithallver2450
@keithallver2450 5 років тому
While I hope Elon pulls it off, I wish they would not call the thing Starship. Its supposed to take people to Mar's, not Proxima Centauri.
@Bryan-Hensley
@Bryan-Hensley 5 років тому
Planetship sounds stupid though
@Bryan-Hensley
@Bryan-Hensley 5 років тому
Let's go back to Big F*"king Rocket
@Desrtfox71
@Desrtfox71 5 років тому
Lockheed Shooting Star, Starfighter, Starlifter, Ford Comet, Boeing Starliner. There is a long history of naming various types of vehicle with astronomical names, despite them not being designed to actually go to their namesake. Starship is fine.
@keithallver2450
@keithallver2450 5 років тому
@@Bryan-Hensley I was fine with BFR but I preferred Big Falcon Rocket.
@Bryan-Hensley
@Bryan-Hensley 5 років тому
@@keithallver2450 I wonder if the upcoming falcon eye rocket had any influence on the name change
@amon2onej27
@amon2onej27 4 роки тому
This is slowly becoming my favorite channel
@r0ntuber
@r0ntuber 4 роки тому
Thanks for making these videos!
@florenciovela7570
@florenciovela7570 2 роки тому
we love space x. We traveled to Boca Chica to the the starshing get built. & we got the S dual motor fsd last Christmas 🎄 😎 still have the cybertruck tri motor or 4 motor fsd on order..
@Mouthuos
@Mouthuos 5 років тому
"Sometimes you just need to make mistakes to learn" you sir, are a legend.
@brzak1ad
@brzak1ad 5 років тому
The way he said "aluminum" had me cracking up! His accent sounded like a mix between an Irishman and a pirate, naturally I'm super jealous that I don't talk like that! Definitely kept me entertained mimicking him throughout the video - but all jokes aside, love the video, and please keep up the good work!
@RillaVanillaKilla
@RillaVanillaKilla 5 років тому
Adam Brzak, I know right, saying a word like it’s meant to be said, and not the butchered American pronunciation. Wild.
@Jondiceful
@Jondiceful 5 років тому
That's because they spell it funny too. Instead of Aluminum, they spell it Aluminium. We are both pronouncing it right, since the word itself is different despite referring to the exact same substance.
@dahorakk
@dahorakk 4 роки тому
What I learned: Space travel is just min/maxing.
@Real_MisterSir
@Real_MisterSir 4 роки тому
Yep, there are no do-it-all solutions in space travel. It's always a matter of where and how you compromise for the job you need to accomplish. It's the same with the rocket science behind the engines etc, there is never a holy grail solution for any problem - only solutions that sacrifice as little as possible of what is essential.
@ChiccinTendies
@ChiccinTendies 3 роки тому
@pyropulse Yeah this kid needs to go outside more and realize that the game of life is literally min/maxing.
@thiencaunguyen1078
@thiencaunguyen1078 3 роки тому
Gồ
@BullCheatFR
@BullCheatFR 3 роки тому
“On the surface though the whole operation looks a bit like a shitshow” 😂😂😂
@bergonius
@bergonius 3 роки тому
It's just highlights how far they went in just 2 years.
@BullCheatFR
@BullCheatFR 3 роки тому
@@bergonius yeah. I just thought that RE brings it up in a funny way
@haikiri2011
@haikiri2011 4 роки тому
Real Engineering 10:36 Sometimes you just need to make mistakes to learn, which is why you should sign up to Brilliant...
@jahmalbaptiste9915
@jahmalbaptiste9915 4 роки тому
"Sometimes you just need to make mistakes to learn... *Which is why you should sign up to Brilliant*" Damn that was brutal XD
@joseinfante5054
@joseinfante5054 4 роки тому
The problem is this one, you learn to create mistakes and you can't create anything else and you are 100 years late. Damn this is brutal. Albert Einstein will smile when he sees these Havana cigars, hungry for fuel and slow as snails, after having seen Tesla UFO testings at 100,000 Klm / h. Real engineering 100 years late in time. TESLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
@mathiastwp
@mathiastwp 4 роки тому
I would love for you to do an update on BFR development, now that the Mk1 Starship is close to complete. The fact that they can make something like that on a beach in Texas, is maybe the most impressive thing about it. It's like performing surgery in a blooming canola field.
@FutureNow
@FutureNow 5 років тому
Elon Musk really needs to sign up for Brilliant.
@HenkdeYouTubesteen
@HenkdeYouTubesteen 5 років тому
Brilliant really needs to sing up for Elon Musk
@Lezzylree
@Lezzylree 5 років тому
Why? He is already educated on rockery
@Glorious_Kim_Jong_Un
@Glorious_Kim_Jong_Un 5 років тому
His team of European engineers that work at SpaceX are the real geniuses if we're being honest. German Engineering > Rest of World
@HenkdeYouTubesteen
@HenkdeYouTubesteen 5 років тому
@@Glorious_Kim_Jong_Un you mean dutch engineering, right?
@BlueBetaPro
@BlueBetaPro 5 років тому
@@Glorious_Kim_Jong_Un That's a pretty ignorant statement. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/e3mnqJ-Fp4F2umQ.html
@seq165432
@seq165432 5 років тому
Matt Groening deserves credit for the design of that spaceship - because I've seen it before on Futurama!!
@jeremiah1st
@jeremiah1st 4 роки тому
And I have seen it in Thunderbirds 50 years ago
@hebegebes1785
@hebegebes1785 4 роки тому
@cosmicVox13 i saw it on buck rogers
@adambomb8324
@adambomb8324 4 роки тому
I saw Marvin Martiain arrive on planET earth in that exact same rocket. I think Bugs Bunny rode on one of those too.
@antonmodig9378
@antonmodig9378 3 роки тому
Really great video! But the best part was the extremely smooth segway to your sponsor :)
@cindyr5056
@cindyr5056 4 роки тому
Great video! Very informative!
@isaiahphillip4112
@isaiahphillip4112 5 років тому
I love this channel, this was a bit of a bizarre video though. Mentioning the fact that the Starship has to reenter "not once, but twice" kind of down plays the significance of what Spacex is doing here. They're not just developing a rocket for the purpose of going to Mars and coming back, they're trying to design a rocket that can go to Mars, come back, and then leave again any number of times. The goal is a fully reusable rocket than can go to space and reenter tens, hundreds, or maybe even (a bit aspirational) thousands of times. And it's not just for Mars, it'll also do routine launches of satellites and cargo to places like the ISS, geostationary orbit, etc. It's intended to completely replace the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, so it's going to be doing quite a bit more than going to Mars.
@HuntingTarg
@HuntingTarg 5 років тому
I think a dozen flights would be great reusability - a hundred would be phe-nominal! It might not be a far-off time where someone is on Mars or a Jovian moon trying to explain to their students or children (one and the same?) What the days of aluminum & carbon fiber rockets were like and why it took six decades to make reliable rockets out of steel. I should plan to see a Falcon Launch soon - there will be more while Starship is being tested.
@cr-xgus6714
@cr-xgus6714 5 років тому
Although remember this is only starship that they are planning to make out of stainless. The rocket, or BFR, is likely going to be made of the same composites as falcon, if I'm not mistaken.
@lukenuke8821
@lukenuke8821 4 роки тому
Yes, the rocket could be reused BUT the initial challenge is to get it up to mars, bring it back and most importantly have it's crew not die. Then, when the rocket is safe home it will be possible to do repairs, change the outer most layer or shields or whatever. The rocket itself will be the same but it won't land and go back again instantly. The structural integrity of the steel won't be the same the first time it launches and when it comes back. What I'm trying to say is that the initial challenge is to: build rocket to get to mars and back, then the next challenge would be different, use old rocket to get people to orbit.
@jeremiah1st
@jeremiah1st 4 роки тому
I would fly to the moon a couple of times before flying to mars but Elon has other impossibble plans. People wake up from this fakery
@cr-xgus6714
@cr-xgus6714 4 роки тому
​@@jeremiah1st More crazy, unrealistic Elon goals. It more nonsense like electric cars, tunnels, re-usable rockets, etc. When are people going to realise that Elon's plans never amount to anything.
@ihavetowait90daystochangem67
@ihavetowait90daystochangem67 5 років тому
We don’t care about actual rockets, we only care about Elon making genetically engineered cat girls
@thatgreenneko
@thatgreenneko 5 років тому
Comrade.You have my support.
@spaceman6463
@spaceman6463 5 років тому
I have to wait 90 days to change my name Yes yes this has my support
@jas4768
@jas4768 5 років тому
Fucking furries
@lioraselby5328
@lioraselby5328 5 років тому
bind nah it’s weebs. Furries want to fuck fully sentient bipedal cats. Weebs just want a human girl with cat ears.
@sirdank5422
@sirdank5422 5 років тому
Every dollar spent on mars rockets is a dollar not spent genetically engineering catgirls for domestic ownership.
@mgpmisterk2322
@mgpmisterk2322 4 роки тому
what a genius design, amazing
@Vamarkos
@Vamarkos 3 роки тому
Excelent presentation and material
@DennisTrovato
@DennisTrovato 5 років тому
Cuz stainless steel vehicles are better for time travel
@dalton-at-work
@dalton-at-work 5 років тому
this comment is too far down the thread!
@fisherjam5182
@fisherjam5182 5 років тому
We don't need roads were we're going!
@tidepoolclipper8657
@tidepoolclipper8657 5 років тому
Gee, can't wait until someone accidentally encounters their past self and causes the collapse of space time continuum!
@andyoli75
@andyoli75 5 років тому
Great Scott!
@anthonyvelazquez3283
@anthonyvelazquez3283 5 років тому
@@fisherjam5182 back to the future 2
@craigspakowski7398
@craigspakowski7398 5 років тому
I think one aspect that was missed in the video is that Stainless steels have also come a long way as far as properties in the last 50 years. They are generally easier to weld than aluminum alloys and not prone to the same fatigue life. In general Stainless steels have gotten significantly stronger (UTS) in the last 30 years and therefore can be considered an option that was not feasible in the 60's of 70's.
@amandamartins3610
@amandamartins3610 4 роки тому
Amazing video! Thanks
@monkeyboyzinaction
@monkeyboyzinaction 3 роки тому
Wondering if you would do an update video on Starship now that it has been 2 years its truly amazing how they developed both Starship + their new raptor engine. And if you notice in Starships current development they have reverted back to using ablative tiles which is interesting.
@davidcadman4468
@davidcadman4468 4 роки тому
few months later, and we are on the cusp of Starhopper doing a 20 m hope, with Starship doing a 20 Km hop in a few months. Hope you will do a follow up. cheers
@FutureNow
@FutureNow 5 років тому
Plus it won't rust from all the humidity on Mars 😝
@meegomeow
@meegomeow 5 років тому
There is no humidity in Mars armosphere
@FutureNow
@FutureNow 5 років тому
@@meegomeow That's the joke, my dude.
@kanva4
@kanva4 5 років тому
@@meegomeow whoooosh! There goes the Big F*cking Rocket (BFR) aka the joke
@nootnootpenguino8586
@nootnootpenguino8586 5 років тому
@@meegomeow r/woooooooooosssshhhhh
@romane.67
@romane.67 5 років тому
@@nootnootpenguino8586 R/woooosh 4 o's
@madhavagrawal8303
@madhavagrawal8303 4 роки тому
Dude, you are better than my physics teacher. You might have just inspired a kid to become an aerospace engineer.
@bramantyopamungkas2368
@bramantyopamungkas2368 3 роки тому
Astronautics engineering student here. Its super challenging. Math.. and programming.. and math.. and programming.. calculus everywhere
@a-drewg1716
@a-drewg1716 3 роки тому
seriously though most people want to be a aerospace engineer, but then you go to college. Then you take an engineering calculus class and you realize....... that liberal arts degree doesn't look so bad anymore.
@DJLite4011
@DJLite4011 3 роки тому
Be inspirational.
@BradiKal61
@BradiKal61 3 роки тому
This week SpaceX just sent a live crew to the ISS, which the US hasn't been able to do for nine years. Elon Musk has his quirks but he is the kind of entrepreneur that America has been lacking for about 40 years, a true innovator and achiever. many other companies have not made nearly so much advancement in their fields (im looking at you,, car companies) but Musk is pushing the envelope and getting results. (by the way the most advancement weve seen in AUTOS was also due to Musk)
@wajapip
@wajapip 3 роки тому
Innovator? As long as you land on a parachute in the ocean? Old stuff, that was the way 60 years ago. Be real and land the normal way on land.
@reed2939
@reed2939 3 роки тому
@@wajapip cringe
@TimothyWhiteheadzm
@TimothyWhiteheadzm 5 років тому
One important factor you didn't give enough attention to is the fact that with very large spacecraft, there is more room for carrying extra weight. For smaller spacecraft there is a very small margin and any extra mass means significantly higher launch costs per kg. However, for a large reusable spacecraft the equation changes dramatically. There is much more room for extra mass and reliability and reusability become far more important. The main reason why super large rockets have not been used till now is the lack of reusability meant the greater complexity of larger rockets was less economical than small ones. They would have had to launch large numbers of satellites on every launch to be economically viable.
@iainstenhouse8399
@iainstenhouse8399 5 років тому
Also this is not for spaceflight, it is only for testing the dynamics of the vehicle when landing vertically
@bluegrayskies3831
@bluegrayskies3831 5 років тому
Timothy Whitehead that’s what everyone thought when they decided to make the space shuttle, and now look at it.
@splintcell2692
@splintcell2692 5 років тому
They says SSTO's sucks. Let's see till someone built a cost efficient and quality SSTO then that kind of rocket reusable will be obsolete.
@iainstenhouse8399
@iainstenhouse8399 5 років тому
Splint Cell eh as nice as SSTOs are on paper it’s far more efficient and cheap even with potential future innovations. Why try and make something a ssto when for the same cost you could have a 2 stage rocket and launch far more. Do not get me wrong sstos are cool they just don’t really work for Earth
@iainstenhouse8399
@iainstenhouse8399 5 років тому
Oh and I assume that your on about a reusable ssto.
@snootdingo9365
@snootdingo9365 5 років тому
Short answer: they felt like replicating Queen Amidala's ship.
@greenbanana311
@greenbanana311 5 років тому
What's with these trite, vapid comments?
@waynebow-gu7wr
@waynebow-gu7wr 4 роки тому
@@greenbanana311 I think the ' Queen Amidala ' remark refers to an old scifi 'Silent Movie '. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/sZ-Dg6VrjKhlmpc.html
@vegacomplex8290
@vegacomplex8290 4 роки тому
@@waynebow-gu7wr you ever seen the Star Wars prequels?
@waynebow-gu7wr
@waynebow-gu7wr 4 роки тому
@@vegacomplex8290 No I haven't... but I realized after posting the link , it was Queen Aelita. But the space ship does look like Musks !
@doc2help
@doc2help 4 роки тому
Cooling the skin with cow farts!! Intriguing.
@joseinfante5054
@joseinfante5054 4 роки тому
Hoo ...! Yes, and use virgin girl's piss for fuel ..!
@epiccollision
@epiccollision 3 роки тому
Liquid cow farts
@TheSOULBRUVVA
@TheSOULBRUVVA 3 роки тому
ITS MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS SWAMP GAS...sorry i shouted, some of you still hand your dicks in your hands!
@larryechols8487
@larryechols8487 3 роки тому
@@epiccollision , good idea.
@edwhalen.1604
@edwhalen.1604 3 роки тому
You could Rib these verticly too! To boost strength.Iso grid is cool too!You guy's are doing fine so far!Good luck!
@benitollan
@benitollan 5 років тому
I highly recommend watching Scott Manley's videos to learn about rocketry stuff in a divulgative level (there're more interesting channels but that's the one I'd always recommend first).
@Patchuchan
@Patchuchan 5 років тому
Use of propellant for cooling during reentry is not as unusual as you think as this is not the first time it was proposed on a space vehicle. It was featured on a lot of Phillip Bono's designs such as the SASSTO and ROMBUS.
@mikeg4972
@mikeg4972 4 роки тому
Looks like a 50's Sci-Fi rocket! Cool!
@Acein2056
@Acein2056 Рік тому
Thanks for the well done video. What I liked most about this video is that it wasn't degraded by having to look at someone's face presenting this video.
@b-man2961
@b-man2961 5 років тому
Could I also suggest that Stainless Steel might offer greater protection from particle bombardment and Hard Radiation, as well as the other benefits?
@greenbanana311
@greenbanana311 5 років тому
Nothing's preventing you from doing so.
@blazer6248
@blazer6248 5 років тому
FYI that aluminum CNC'd away IS NOT wasted. It's collected, melted down, and reused to make new aluminum billets. At least it is in any other business besides SpaceX. I assume they do the same. No one would just "waste" that much aluminum and just throw it away, actually wasting it.
@myvids4329
@myvids4329 5 років тому
Can't do that with carbon fiber, which is what the BFR was originally going to made from
@consciouscool
@consciouscool 5 років тому
They recycle at the space center and at space x.
@pdoylemi
@pdoylemi 5 років тому
Yeah, but the value of the aluminum shavings is tiny compared to the part they were shaved from. The original part might cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and you get to sell back a few thousand in scrap aluminum - it is just slightly better than a total waste.
@24680kong
@24680kong 5 років тому
They don't call it "waste" because they throw it away, they call it that because it is a waste of time, energy, and money. The more material to be removed, the more time it takes (man hours and machine time) to remove it. And it takes a lot more electrical energy to do this. And all this brings up the cost. They don't get much money back from their aluminum waste. Designing parts with less of this waste is super important in producing things economically.
@pdoylemi
@pdoylemi 5 років тому
@@24680kong Isn't that basically what I said?
@jorgeluis1361
@jorgeluis1361 4 роки тому
Dude we need an updated SpaceX video. So much has happened since you released this one.
@AnnaLVajda
@AnnaLVajda 4 роки тому
I love that design.
@chinito2912
@chinito2912 5 років тому
Elon Musk: “In this spaceship we will reach mars” Spaceship: *gets knocked down by wind*
@TauLepton-od3zz
@TauLepton-od3zz 5 років тому
that's just hopper
@shockwave2291
@shockwave2291 5 років тому
"Tis' but a scratch!"
@theholderscock
@theholderscock 5 років тому
Elon musk: *tests it without he top half*
@CardZed
@CardZed 5 років тому
@@theholderscock thats the plan lol, this thing wont go to space. Its like the Grasshopper, just tests.
@austinbarnard7688
@austinbarnard7688 5 років тому
Starrrrrrrshipppppp is almost ready 🚀
@dheemanrajkhowa2866
@dheemanrajkhowa2866 5 років тому
Please do one on the raptor engine as well!!
@canoemantoo1
@canoemantoo1 3 роки тому
It's truly amazing that the new S/S SpaceX Starship looks so much like the space-Ships of the 1950's movies.
@markrainford1219
@markrainford1219 4 роки тому
Has anyone asked the Martians how they feel about being colonised?
@projectkepleren
@projectkepleren 4 роки тому
i don't know. i don't speak communication protien my cell sure as hell do
@joseinfante5054
@joseinfante5054 4 роки тому
They are not going to be full of garbage because TESLAAAAAA was Killed not to go there and come back in 5 minutes.
@jypsridic
@jypsridic 3 роки тому
Don't worry, if DC has taught us anything it's that martians are weak to fire, and fire is something humans are particularly good at.
@joseinfante5054
@joseinfante5054 3 роки тому
@@jypsridic Fire wath ? rockets hungry for fuel and slow as snails, or scrub fires?
@jypsridic
@jypsridic 3 роки тому
@@joseinfante5054 It was a comic book reference
@user-bl4oq7fd8d
@user-bl4oq7fd8d 5 років тому
"Sometimes you just need to make mistakes to learn, which is why you should sign up to brilliant." Sounds like it's would be a mistake to sign up :P
@doktorsalami9315
@doktorsalami9315 5 років тому
yeah, and you (obviously) should so it
@gaslitworldf.melissab2897
@gaslitworldf.melissab2897 5 років тому
That said, why bother sending humans until much of it has been perfected to the extent deemed possible by the team. Why suffer loss of human life for something experimental when we can record everything with computers, even diagnostics. Probes can collect faster than humans requiring no additional food to perform. Once we feel ready, we should build a station just outside the atmosphere and expand it over time to add researchers and astronauts and to experience the physicality of being in space. If they need to return they won't be too far away to do that.
@doktorsalami9315
@doktorsalami9315 5 років тому
@@gaslitworldf.melissab2897 The problem with that, is that we can't build a perfect machine. Imagine we would have waited to drive cars until they are 100%ly safe. We wouldn't even drive today. That said we shouldn't wait until we have the perfect rocket (which we won't ever have) to send humans in space. You wouldn't believe it, but the ISS is a space station outside the earth atmosphere where we sent Scientists to experience the physicality of being in space. And they return. Thumbs up for that. In my book were ready for further steps
@zach4832
@zach4832 5 років тому
*Me acting as if understood anything he said in the video*
@LordSandwichII
@LordSandwichII 5 років тому
Well, it is rocket science, so...
@taliakellegg5978
@taliakellegg5978 5 років тому
Same
@RU-zm7wj
@RU-zm7wj 5 років тому
Physics 101.
@uTubeMeltsYourBrain
@uTubeMeltsYourBrain 5 років тому
Da fuck? He’s not even using any math.
@tiagosimoes6070
@tiagosimoes6070 5 років тому
its easy you see? its just... rocket...metal... hot...hmm...wind making rocket fall over....hmmmm..science, its... easy
@austinbarnard7688
@austinbarnard7688 4 роки тому
I’m from the future starhopper did it, StarShip is coming 🚀
@patrickmurray1095
@patrickmurray1095 3 роки тому
Nice to hear a smart fellow irishman!love the video's!
How SpaceX Reinvented The Rocket!
21:01
The Space Race
Переглядів 828 тис.
Why SpaceX is Making Starlink
16:01
Real Engineering
Переглядів 7 млн
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Переглядів 1,9 млн
Мы играли всей семьей
00:27
Даша Боровик
Переглядів 3,3 млн
The Insane Engineering of the Thunderscreech
19:27
Real Engineering
Переглядів 3,6 млн
Why North Korea Can't Build An ICBM (yet)
8:17
Real Engineering
Переглядів 1,8 млн
Titanium - The Metal That Made The SR-71 Possible
17:50
Real Engineering
Переглядів 2,5 млн
What's Really Happening At CERN
23:01
Space Matters
Переглядів 14 тис.
The Future of Airliners? - Aurora D8
10:50
Real Engineering
Переглядів 3 млн
Is The F-35 Worth $115 Million?
23:49
Real Engineering
Переглядів 6 млн
The Truth About Space Debris
16:23
Real Engineering
Переглядів 2,9 млн
What Life Inside The SpaceX Starship Will Be Like!
11:30
The Space Race
Переглядів 2,1 млн
❌УШЛА ЭПОХА!🍏
0:37
Demin's Lounge
Переглядів 306 тис.
Какой телефон лучше всего снимает? 🤯
0:42
#Shorts Good idea for testing to show.
0:17
RAIN Gadgets
Переглядів 3,2 млн
Хомяк может разблокировать АЙФОН
0:14
Собиратель новостей
Переглядів 1,6 млн
поворотний механізм для антени
0:17
Lazeruk
Переглядів 14 тис.