Why Starlink Is Crucial To SpaceX’s Success

  Переглядів 1,489,567

CNBC

CNBC

День тому

SpaceX’s broadband satellite internet, Starlink, is still in beta, but already has over 10,000 customers. The fledgling service is expected to be a cash cow for SpaceX, bringing in as much as $30 billion a year - more than 10 times the annual revenue of its existing rocket business. This revenue will be used to fuel Elon Musk’s ultimate goal of building a colony on Mars. Eventually, Starlink may even keep us connected on the Red Planet.
Elon Musk’s SpaceX rolled out its Starlink early access program to the public six months ago, with the satellite internet service growing to more than 10,000 users in the first few months.
To get real-life first impressions of the service, CNBC spoke to more than 50 people who have been using Starlink. Those surveyed included households in Canada and 13 U.S. states: California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
The majority of these Starlink users are in rural or remote areas, such as farmland or wilderness, with limited access to terrestrial broadband options - and a few with no access altogether.
“I expect to keep the service long term,” a user in Montana told CNBC. “The price of the beta for the service is more reasonable than any other option we have, and those are worse in performance. I will keep Starlink as long as its the only broadband option available to me.”
Starlink is the company’s capital-intensive project to build an interconnected internet network with thousands of satellites, known in the space industry as a constellation, designed to deliver high-speed internet to consumers anywhere on the planet.
SpaceX launched the “Better than Nothing Beta” program for the public in October, and the majority of users CNBC surveyed received invitations to join between November and February. The service is priced at $99 a month in the U.S. under the beta, with a $499 upfront cost for the equipment customers need to connect to the satellites - plus taxes, shipping, and any accessories needed to mount the antenna.
CNBC’s surveyed users on total cost, the installation process, what they thought of SpaceX’s equipment, internet speed, reliability of the service, what their service alternatives were, their experience with customer service, any concerns they had, and their overall impressions.
00:00 - Introduction
02:24 - Understanding Starlink
07:15 - SpaceX’s golden ticket
10:05 - Challenges
16:12 - Future of Starlink
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Google+: cnb.cx/PlusCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#CNBC
#SpaceX
Why Starlink Is Crucial To SpaceX’s Success

КОМЕНТАРІ: 2 200
@HeavenConstellations
@HeavenConstellations 3 роки тому
I got a starlink in rural Georgia and I get over 120-160mbps download and 20mbps uploads. Before with local internet I got 10mbps download and 2-5mbps upload and the price was about the same.
@themeanestkitten
@themeanestkitten 3 роки тому
It's for people who can't get internet any other way, If you're stuck in the middle of nowhere any internet is better than none.
@HeavenConstellations
@HeavenConstellations 3 роки тому
@@themeanestkitten I can finally watch video streams in 4k now. With my old internet it could barely handle 720 p. And 360p if more than 3 people were connected to the internet.
@BRM202
@BRM202 3 роки тому
Dang. Im at 35.4. Still haven't gotten mine yet. im at 10 MPS from a local telephone coop.
@keineangabe1804
@keineangabe1804 3 роки тому
What is your latency? How big is your ping? Are games playable?
@HeavenConstellations
@HeavenConstellations 3 роки тому
@@keineangabe1804 I get 30-60 ping depending where the server is located. It's good better than the 90 ping I would get on good days that would go up to 300+ ping a lot.
@Sumtoshi
@Sumtoshi 3 роки тому
My Starlink has been up and running in Boise Idaho for about 3 months now. It’s way better than my cable company so far. Highly recommend everyone interested start their research
@GardenGuy1943
@GardenGuy1943 3 роки тому
No
@Countcho
@Countcho 3 роки тому
Awesome
@joebloe1401
@joebloe1401 3 роки тому
TOO MUCH CRAP IN THE SKY ALREADY!!! DON'T DESTROY EARTH JUST TO MAKE A CITY ON MARS!!!--VERY STUPID!!!!!
@tommyt9479
@tommyt9479 3 роки тому
@@joebloe1401 we are just dumb apes who are dwelling in our own personal problems revolving around a society we made for ourselves, waiting for a comet to come start us over again. Stop being ridiculous we need to advance rather than sit here, making our lives nothing but useless at the end of the day.
@ExcessumGaming
@ExcessumGaming 3 роки тому
@@joebloe1401 The Satelites for Starlink are in such a low orbit that they will burn in atmosphere on their own within 5y w/o any need for extra propulsion. Its funny that they did not mention that. Kesler Syndrome mostly is related to Satelites that are on the standard orbits that are 20x-1000x higher where they can stay in orbit for thousands of years or forever.
@LaidBackLiving
@LaidBackLiving 3 роки тому
What a great video. It was a pleasure working with you guys!
@camalex7782
@camalex7782 3 роки тому
I just subbed to your channel
@krzysztofziomek5176
@krzysztofziomek5176 3 роки тому
You can send them advice that probably the reason why rocket exploding during landing is probably when fire from rocket bounce from rocket to ground it bounces from ground back to rocket making it overheat.
@jacksonmmello7397
@jacksonmmello7397 3 роки тому
i checked comments to see if u replyed and would u look at that (i like ur beard btw)
@jacksonmmello7397
@jacksonmmello7397 3 роки тому
@@krzysztofziomek5176 ??
@onecrowdehour
@onecrowdehour 3 роки тому
You were great, great doco on Elon
@xiaoka
@xiaoka 3 роки тому
The competition has zero chance to compete. Owning the rockets makes all the difference. Starlink’s volume drives down Spacex operating costs for every thing. Starlink gets launches at cost, which is way lower than SpaceX’s competitors can charge, even before their markup. No one else has a chance.
@lukesmeby
@lukesmeby 3 роки тому
Plus they are able to launch there satellites on test flights.
@aribloch
@aribloch 3 роки тому
Competition won't be satellite in the future, it will be 5G
@RasakBlood
@RasakBlood 3 роки тому
Cheapest ride to space will have the cheapest satellite constellation and therefore price. Everyone else will have to suffer double the initial deployment costs. The only ones that stand a chance are Blue origin if their new glen rocket ever becomes reality and big nation backed project's where cost is not a issue.
@nitishkannan2919
@nitishkannan2919 3 роки тому
5g could replace all home internet for the rest
@haruspex1-50
@haruspex1-50 3 роки тому
Blue Origins Kuiper does. It’s connection with Amazon makes them worthwhile competition
@Firestorm637
@Firestorm637 3 роки тому
I preordered Starlink and I live on Maui. More competition helps customers. I have Spectrum now.
@JasonB808
@JasonB808 3 роки тому
Yeah the once oceanic cable is too much of a monopoly. But I Work from home sometimes and the minutes long drop offs would not be good. Also in Oahu I have extreme internet which is about 90 dollars for 250 Mb down and 20 up. Right now mr. monopoly is the better choice. Just got to wait until Starlink is past beta phase.
@MajorPickleSwag
@MajorPickleSwag 3 роки тому
@@JasonB808 Wait what's the whole internet situation in Hawaii?
@joebloe1401
@joebloe1401 3 роки тому
TOO MUCH CRAP IN THE SKY ALREADY!!! DON'T DESTROY EARTH JUST TO MAKE A CITY ON MARS!!!--VERY STUPID!!!!!
@joepopplewell680
@joepopplewell680 3 роки тому
@@joebloe1401 How are satellites in space which last 5 years and can deorbit and get more reliable over time, destroying the Earth? Should everyone in a rural community put up with bad internet or no internet simply because you feel bad? People like you make people want to make a city on mars in the first place to get away from the stupid on Earth.
@peredavi
@peredavi 3 роки тому
@@joebloe1401 You have no idea what you’re talking of.
@Jaxon-iu6vb
@Jaxon-iu6vb 3 роки тому
Where I live in rural Canada Starlink is going to be a huge success
@TomNook.
@TomNook. 3 роки тому
If the whole world is doing this seperately, LEO is going to be as polluted as down on the ground.
@poopahskoopahh8563
@poopahskoopahh8563 3 роки тому
Me too, whole town of 10,000 is Intrestef
@snuffeldjuret
@snuffeldjuret 3 роки тому
@@TomNook. you only really need 3 systems though. Two western that compete and one china+russia+friends collab for the countries that don't like CIA and/or fair competition.
@dirktween244
@dirktween244 3 роки тому
Even in many of the major cities, Starling has a great advantage ! The best reception areas, being the baren/agriculture areas . These are not the best for connection towers ! There is also a major difference in many Urban areas ! Current geography, and increasing building sizes, suggests the need for satellite connections.
@Respectedevil1
@Respectedevil1 3 роки тому
@@snuffeldjuret There is no chance that Russia and China share one.
@Morgan-xu7qs
@Morgan-xu7qs 3 роки тому
I think it was a classy move to work with the astronomers instead of telling them to pound sand.
@neeljavia2965
@neeljavia2965 3 роки тому
And something which every business should do. Help the common people.
@ShaudaySmith
@ShaudaySmith 3 роки тому
Acknowledging you're not the only guy in town and creating room others.. A very classy move indeed. :D
@heyreddy6033
@heyreddy6033 3 роки тому
ukposts.info/have/v-deo/gHd7g6Zrm3qLuYU.html
@HappyfoxBiz
@HappyfoxBiz 3 роки тому
they have no choice, Astronomers complain to NASA, SpaceX could lose the ability to launch from the facility, they continue to do so congress can clip their wings for good. Sometimes it's better to take the challenging route before it become unbearable
@someoneinthecrowd4313
@someoneinthecrowd4313 3 роки тому
@@HappyfoxBiz You take the longer route around the mountain, instead of the short route up the mountain that ends in a freefall off a cliff.
@davidwolf226
@davidwolf226 3 роки тому
I can't tell you folks at CNBC just how much I appreciate this explanation of what Starlink is all about! Thank you so much!
@gigachad1983
@gigachad1983 3 роки тому
ok boomer
@mr.marketoriginal3808
@mr.marketoriginal3808 3 роки тому
Starlink will be one of the biggest and coolest companies in the world!
@Lowkeyyshorts
@Lowkeyyshorts 3 роки тому
Wish I could invest now 😪
@edwardfeng1888
@edwardfeng1888 3 роки тому
@@Lowkeyyshorts Yeah I wish they would go public.
@GamerbyDesign
@GamerbyDesign 3 роки тому
I doubt it will become one of the biggest ISPs. Comcast is the largest broadband provider in the US and it has over 22 million customers. Just because 70 million home can get starlink doesn't mean they will. Starlink was made to make Space X look better by having more rocket launches. Its for cost offset purposes. Elon Musk has said it himself.
@michaelb9940
@michaelb9940 3 роки тому
But at what cost?! The entirety of this video and you just picked up on the “coolness” of this project! It completely overshadowed by the problems it could create for the atmosphere! This is a big deal actually
@akyhne
@akyhne 3 роки тому
The Starlink network will only have bandwidth for a few million users. Not exactly breathtaking. And what about the other billions of users?
@tofulosophy
@tofulosophy 3 роки тому
These videos are so well made!
@Sintesi.
@Sintesi. 3 роки тому
@@vincentlaw82 Imagine Comcast promoting future competitors for free. In 5 years Starlink will be the number 1 global internet provider.
@GardenGuy1943
@GardenGuy1943 3 роки тому
I always get frustrated
@joebloe1401
@joebloe1401 3 роки тому
TOO MUCH CRAP IN THE SKY ALREADY!!! DON'T DESTROY EARTH JUST TO MAKE A CITY ON MARS!!!--VERY STUPID!!!!!
@joshuajoe1419
@joshuajoe1419 3 роки тому
Ikr, these videos are better that CNBC actual news division.
@dirktween244
@dirktween244 3 роки тому
Would like to see Updated/Current information. 3 year old information, is not very helpful ! Bonus ? Far less bias, in the reporting.
@potato2941
@potato2941 3 роки тому
I don't care if it's a bubble or Starlink is not profitable. Starlink has been a godsend to my family in the rural area. I will buy every spacex/starlink stock I can. I don't care if it goes to 0, I want Starlink to succeed. correction for CNBC, @4:29 latency is not important for video streaming because of buffering. It's only important for video conferencing, calling, and gaming.
@sweiland75
@sweiland75 3 роки тому
You might want to sort out your thoughts before you comment so they at least make some sense.
@mvmlego1212
@mvmlego1212 3 роки тому
I've heard that low-latency stock-trading is also very lucrative, as well. Regardless, it really does seem like Musk struck gold with this idea.
@bindingcurve
@bindingcurve 3 роки тому
@@mvmlego1212 That is done with equal length fiber runs going into the trading centers. NOT an application of starlink
@mvmlego1212
@mvmlego1212 3 роки тому
@@bindingcurve -- _"NOT an application of starlink"_ Are you sure about that? Lasers offer an even lower-latency option than fiber-optic cables. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/n5mCbK58jqCfo6c.html (4:49-12:11)
@bindingcurve
@bindingcurve 3 роки тому
@@mvmlego1212 Just read up on the actual tech papers. For long distance trading is has the potential, but don't bet on it. Relaying of moving targets may introduce unacceptable flutter.
@ariochiv
@ariochiv 3 роки тому
De-orbiting failed Starlink satellites is not a long-term problem. At the low altitude at which Starlink orbits, the satellites are experiencing small amounts of atmospheric drag that will eventually decay the orbit and cause the satellite to reenter and burn up, even if it has no communication or propulsion.
@Chidozie01
@Chidozie01 3 роки тому
how long is "eventually"?
@sSpartan666
@sSpartan666 3 роки тому
@@Chidozie01 it depends
@simonair
@simonair 3 роки тому
@@Chidozie01 Around 5 years for starlink sats
@ariochiv
@ariochiv 3 роки тому
@ok ok The regulation they mentioned in this video would require satellites to de-orbit within 25 years. 5 years is 5 times shorter than that, and we're only talking about the worst-case scenario where SpaceX completely loses control the satellite. Which hasn't happened yet (to my knowledge) in any of the 1200+ satellites launched so far. There would not be dozens or hundreds of dead satellites in 5 years.
@simonair
@simonair 3 роки тому
@ok ok I was referring to if all system fails. 5 years is the natural time it takes for the sat to burn up if the propulsion system does not work.
@MrChiefsmaster
@MrChiefsmaster 3 роки тому
3:33 wrong rocket animation. They are launching them on a Falcon 9, not a Falcon Heavy
@charleskayser4646
@charleskayser4646 3 роки тому
Good animated rocket identification skills
@chesterwang3070
@chesterwang3070 3 роки тому
@@charleskayser4646 falcon 9 has no side boosters. falcon heavy has side boosters. not that hard. it's like a motorcycle vs a car.
@mikeking596
@mikeking596 3 роки тому
They mention that the low latency is good for games and movies and forget to mention video/voice chat (phones). Latency means how long it takes to get there, so if I say hello on my voice chat, how long does it take for the other person to hear it (then they have to respond). Latency is not much of an issue for movies. Bad latency means you press the play button to start,,, and have to wait 2 seconds instead of 1/2 second, but from that point on the movie plays fine so long as you have the BANDWIDTH (100 meg download).
@itsover9008
@itsover9008 3 роки тому
Gaming, Video conferencing, Stock market trading will get the maximum benefit from this. Science will also benefit. Remote sensor stations, Telescopes etc, stand to benefit from high throughput and low latency connections and the ability to connect from anywhere.
@starship1128
@starship1128 3 роки тому
The part about the movie is not correct. The movie usually pre-loaded and commence or stop action is done locally. However, if the latency is good for games, than it will most likely be good for video and voice chat. The light travels faster in vacuum than in optical fiber.
@TheRealUnconnected
@TheRealUnconnected 3 роки тому
It still has far higher latency than fiber optic systems. Its lower than geostationary sat internet, but it has a minimum 20ms latency, i can get 1ms - 5ms on fiber.
@starship1128
@starship1128 3 роки тому
@@TheRealUnconnected That depends how far is the server. 1ms to 5 ms only allows light to travel 300km-1500 km at max. That means your target server is quite near you. If your location is remote, the server could also be far from you, which is the reason for higher latency.
@gernotfischer7908
@gernotfischer7908 3 роки тому
@@TheRealUnconnected and Starlink isnt built to compet with fiber. Its designed for areas without fiber.
@MrBuildboy
@MrBuildboy 3 роки тому
I’m tired of Comcast and other communication companies always sneaking in service charges. I hope satellite internet companies won’t do that and provide us refuge from the constant headaches of constantly negotiating lower rates.
@WasatchWind
@WasatchWind 3 роки тому
Maybe not satellite internet in general, but Elon with Tesla and Starlink is gung go about no hidden fees. The cost is what you pay, period.
@j4genius961
@j4genius961 3 роки тому
Companies are companies buddy, you can always trust them from seeking as much profit as possible
@mvmlego1212
@mvmlego1212 3 роки тому
@@j4genius961 -- That's true. Nevertheless, good PR is good for long-term profits, and having a transparent pricing system is certainly good for PR, especially if it sets the company apart from its competition.
@livethefuture2492
@livethefuture2492 3 роки тому
@@j4genius961 Elon's companies like Tesla and SpaceX are different, in that they actually genuinely care about making the best possible product they can, and focus on pushing innovation. luckily thanks to their strategy they are way ahead of the curve. their innovative and technological edge leads to FAR better products than anyone else and in turn dominating their respective industries. they're betting on LONG-TERM benefits and returns, rather than short-term profits.
@LL.Johnson
@LL.Johnson 3 роки тому
I was able to get on Comcast's internet essentials program while unemployed during the pandemic. It's only $10/month, and they just increased the speed to 100mbs. Before that I was paying way too much for internet through them.
@AFAndersen
@AFAndersen 3 роки тому
Moves to the most remote place they can find... "wait, where ma internets?"
@mikeking596
@mikeking596 3 роки тому
They are putting some of the sats in polar orbits (from the north pole to the south pole covering every point in between). So unless that remote place is deep underwater/ground.... it will eventually work.
@Daniela-pr7rz
@Daniela-pr7rz 3 роки тому
Eventually aka later this year.
@deadwingdomain
@deadwingdomain 3 роки тому
People are stupid for being so attached to such trash. Live in the woods or the city, but make a choice an live with it...
@Andrew-Kerr
@Andrew-Kerr 3 роки тому
@@deadwingdomain More stupid to go and live in the woods without internet if a reasonably good and affordable way to get it exists. What's the point of going to live in the woods if you can't go on social media and post smug pics and vids showing off how cool you are living in the woods.
@alterego157
@alterego157 3 роки тому
It's a perfect combination.
@senorswordfish6019
@senorswordfish6019 3 роки тому
Where are my Filipinos at?? Finally, reliable internet guys!
@pinoyviralvideos1219
@pinoyviralvideos1219 3 роки тому
Sa pagkaka alam ko ibaba ang cost rate sa mga third world countries. So maybe affordable na to sa atin.
@jadernautyh2718
@jadernautyh2718 3 роки тому
Visited the starlink to check my place sa Metro Manila, not able to process pa. Kelan kaya. Umay na telcos natin.
@ganzmontejo4176
@ganzmontejo4176 3 роки тому
Pag nasa city kayo then di nyo kailangan ang starlink. Especially sa metro Manila. Starlink is intended to be used in provinces and islands without net connectivity.
@DragonKingGaav
@DragonKingGaav 3 роки тому
3:34 I like how it showed the Falcon Heavy, when the Falcon Heavy hasn't been used for Starlink!
@wenwin7038
@wenwin7038 3 роки тому
Yes,,,is there any possibility that Mars can be second homeland for humans
@RuiSilva450
@RuiSilva450 3 роки тому
@@wenwin7038 offtopic?
@chesterwang3070
@chesterwang3070 3 роки тому
@@wenwin7038 Of course there is a possibility (tho in our lifetime a very slim one). However, Mars is a very very very very very harsh place. It's a cold, radioactive desert (Mars barely has a magnetic field, and therefore there is nothing to shield the solar wind, aka radiation). We would have to find ways to overcome the challenges Mars presents. It will not be easy. Food is the main issue, as bringing enough food for 2 years is no easy task (a transfer window to Mars only comes every 2 years. No supplies can arrive during those 2 years). For long term stays, aka a "homeland", radiation becomes a bigger problem.
@iKingRPG
@iKingRPG 3 роки тому
Ikr
@graullas8981
@graullas8981 3 роки тому
@@chesterwang3070 You don't know much about Mars. Actually Mars is not ,,radioactive desert'' - its a stupid hollywood assumption, most places on Mars experience radiation levels similar to those on ISS - we live in ISS don't we? Food is not even on top 5 priorites on Mars too. Main concern is of course pressurization, oxygen and heat - heat is the number one enemy for now because we are only sending robots to Mars - and they need to survive cold martian night (temperatures as low as -80C) by warming their electronics with heaters. Second enemy as for now is martian dust which killed one of our rovers - Opportunity, and its really problematic because its toxic to humans and charged so it is attracted to metals etc.
@rickjames4181
@rickjames4181 2 роки тому
I got mine in rural south Alabama and it is absolutely the bomb. Averaging around 200mb down and 15 up with about 30-40 ping. Haven't even put it on a pole yet. For some one who lived here with bad internet for so long, starlink has been a game changer.
@That-Guy_
@That-Guy_ 3 роки тому
I already preordered mine Should be here by end of year
@Tryckert
@Tryckert 3 роки тому
We ordered starlink and it came in 3 weeks. It could be there fast for you
@That-Guy_
@That-Guy_ 3 роки тому
@@Tryckert My area needs more coverage before its available here
@TheGrandMgM
@TheGrandMgM 3 роки тому
@@Tryckert when did it say it was coming? did it say a month or did it say mid 2021 to late 2021?
@bassam_salim
@bassam_salim 3 роки тому
@@TheGrandMgM in my area it said mid 2022, I want to work as software developer freelancer and my 0.5mbps down 0.01 mbps up is stopping me
@josiah1851
@josiah1851 3 роки тому
How much does it cost?
@billmoyer3254
@billmoyer3254 3 роки тому
Waiting for IPO....yes, please!
@rudasalma2031
@rudasalma2031 3 роки тому
Buy google , google has a 10% stake in spaceX
@markadler8983
@markadler8983 3 роки тому
@@rudasalma2031 good point
@joebloe1401
@joebloe1401 3 роки тому
TOO MUCH CRAP IN THE SKY ALREADY!!! DON'T DESTROY EARTH JUST TO MAKE A CITY ON MARS!!!--VERY STUPID!!!!!
@bhanusM99
@bhanusM99 3 роки тому
Well musk has said a lot of times that Spacex will not go public and goes for ipo
@markadler8983
@markadler8983 3 роки тому
@@bhanusM99 he said starlink will ipo
@jetsetter8541
@jetsetter8541 3 роки тому
My area of interest is Starlink for RVs, especially the dish antenna that could be inside the dome for GPS reception while driving or for stationary use the lowering or foldable dish.
@samuelotte1189
@samuelotte1189 3 роки тому
We saw them flying overhead in rural Nebraska May 7th 2021 it was awesome to see that trail of lights!
@ryansilvers2166
@ryansilvers2166 3 роки тому
I have starlink here in the country side/farmland of Indiana, it works good when we had it on the ground but we put it on the roof and it pretty much triple our mps and download and upload speed. They need longer cable so I can go up a tree and hook it up to it
@ryansilvers2166
@ryansilvers2166 3 роки тому
I'm in a valley with trees all around is why I say that last part it would help me
@pmcc5007
@pmcc5007 3 роки тому
Great comment. Ground mounting is not going to be the best option for most folks living in the country to maximize Starlink performance.
@blackhole2345
@blackhole2345 3 роки тому
Can this work in a remote region like the equatorial forest ?
@Diggnuts
@Diggnuts 3 роки тому
Yes. Eventually.
@Ignacio.Romero
@Ignacio.Romero 3 роки тому
With enough satellites, yes
@simondalling7489
@simondalling7489 3 роки тому
At the moment the Starlink satellites do not, with a few exceptions, have satellite to satellite comms, relying on ground stations. This will likely change, but until then, no it will not work in equatorial forest as there are no ground stations.
@Diggnuts
@Diggnuts 3 роки тому
@@simondalling7489 At the moment there are barely any satellites covering that area at all, so ground stations are irrelevant.
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 3 роки тому
Simon Dalling Ground station can be up to 2000km from user dish.
@samsonrene1
@samsonrene1 3 роки тому
Starlink will be totally beneficial for the Caribbean and many other developing countries.
@craigme2583
@craigme2583 3 роки тому
Also covers Australia. A little expensive especially given the start up costs, but its a much faster service than normally available out of town.
@DavidR06
@DavidR06 3 роки тому
Congratulations you were only a few months late to this news. Great reporting
@WhiteCarBlackWheels
@WhiteCarBlackWheels 3 роки тому
i miss mackenzie sigalos and CNBC after hours...
@ianmathenge3428
@ianmathenge3428 3 роки тому
CNBC after hours moved over to their CNBC Television youtube channel
@WhiteCarBlackWheels
@WhiteCarBlackWheels 3 роки тому
@@ianmathenge3428 have you seen that channel? They spam like 20+ vids a day... makes more sense on this channel
@theOrionsarms
@theOrionsarms 3 роки тому
@@WhiteCarBlackWheels it's a separate Playlist only with after hours clips on that channel, save whole Playlist on your library (on the UKposts app) and watch when you like.
@WhiteCarBlackWheels
@WhiteCarBlackWheels 3 роки тому
@@theOrionsarms ofc thats the first thing i tried. unless i'm seeing it wrong - the playlist hasn't been updated since mar 15 2021. they keep dropping videos but arent adding it to the playlist.
@theOrionsarms
@theOrionsarms 3 роки тому
@@WhiteCarBlackWheels for me has worked, I don't know why you see a different Playlist that isn't renewed , different regions I guessing .
@Pen2paw
@Pen2paw 3 роки тому
I hope Starlink is successful. We pay about $100 per month on internet for households in Canada. I think it may change pricing in Canada in the future. Unfortunately, it takes our neighbour to force these monopoly companies to change them.
@kameel28
@kameel28 3 роки тому
Very well documentary, thanks!
@emailrobertbm
@emailrobertbm 3 роки тому
One of the best news overview I’ve seen in many years. So nice to have a factual, bias free story. Thank you!
@jbrown6759
@jbrown6759 3 роки тому
@,,,,+,,,,1 ,,, 7,,,, 0,,,, 8 ,,,, 4,,, 9,,,, 2,,,, 8,,,, 5,,,, 4,,,, 5,,,,
@HelloWorld-ns7gt
@HelloWorld-ns7gt 3 роки тому
lol
@ziwer1
@ziwer1 2 роки тому
when you leave the faux new bubble 🤣😂
@Moonlight-sj7qc
@Moonlight-sj7qc 3 роки тому
Elon Musk is not just a businessman he is a visionary and always think way ahead of his time
@Daniela-pr7rz
@Daniela-pr7rz 3 роки тому
What about the size of his balls? Who else goes head on on so many impossible industries?
@fobusas
@fobusas 3 роки тому
Them being up 5 years is a good thing. It mitigates Kessler syndrome, not causes it. Because they are so low in orbit. But that's not the case for constellations proposed by other companies, that would have them in far higher orbits.
@cmdr1911
@cmdr1911 3 роки тому
They are extremely low so like you said they arent a huge issue. They will deorbit themselves. There is also a hige incentive to not block access to your own space.
@graullas8981
@graullas8981 3 роки тому
Plus each one of them has ion engine. If something has ion engine - it is not a space debris concern, because it can deorbit itself after its mission and avoid collision with other satellites or space trash.
@gytis156
@gytis156 3 роки тому
@@graullas8981 This video did point out that those ion engines might fail at some point, or connection to sattelite might cut out. These things need to countdown their own death and deorbit themselves after 5 years even without spacex executing that command, so if they lose connection to it, it would still deorbit itself if engine works.
@graullas8981
@graullas8981 3 роки тому
@@gytis156 Yes but probability of starlink failure is really low and yes being in LEO is making it even better but mainly everything that doesnt have ion engines on orbit shouldnt be launched because it cant manevour and avoid hitting something else. The only fact that starlinks have ion engines should end every argument about it being space trash.
@brianperry4815
@brianperry4815 3 роки тому
The other thing is that technology advances in the future the need for lower orbit satellites decreases as then they can be put in higher orbit with alot less satellites. In the future they may have a space station control center of better yet a space foundry and make materials that can't be made on Earth.lighter,stronger.less likely to corrode.
@gregparrott
@gregparrott 3 роки тому
Good presentation of a new subject (at least for most of us)
@WasatchWind
@WasatchWind 3 роки тому
It's definitely something to look into. SpaceX is by no means some perfect company - but they actually have admirable ambitions that will help humanity, and that I think is a far better reason to send your money to them than to Comcast.
@shreechatane9215
@shreechatane9215 2 роки тому
One company's dominance over space is scary
@strategygaming5830
@strategygaming5830 Рік тому
But without that company space wouldn’t be accessibly like it is.
@mbaye501
@mbaye501 Рік тому
Wonder how China , Russia and other « unfriendly » countries feel about having a network of American satellites flying over their head
@mskogly
@mskogly 3 роки тому
The price of the dishes isnt the issue. If the dish costs 1000 usd to make, the sales price is 500 and the subcription is 100 pr month it doesn't take "a long time" to break even. It takes 6 months. The satelites, ground stations and rocket launches on the other hand :)
@metin9704
@metin9704 2 роки тому
hahahaha
@krzysztofmeler
@krzysztofmeler 2 роки тому
Check out the cost of satelites deployement, internet access prices etc. and those $500 + $100 each month is going to be definitely not enough to make it profitable, even Musk said this.
@AlexCio
@AlexCio 3 роки тому
Wow, what a crazy project, haven't heard about it before!
@masterroshi376
@masterroshi376 3 роки тому
You must live under a rock
@AlexCio
@AlexCio 3 роки тому
@@masterroshi376 That's the reason I am a content creator and you are a consumer? 😃😃
@ModernDayGeeks
@ModernDayGeeks 2 роки тому
The explanation done about Starlink is remarkably informative. Awesome video for learning about Starlink!
@abhi5540
@abhi5540 3 роки тому
Is the signal affected by rain? I am using a dish for cable tv which loses signal during rain.
@nasawormlogo9521
@nasawormlogo9521 3 роки тому
From what I’ve heard, it doesn’t affect it too much because they are in a way lower orbit than satellites, like Dish TV’s.
@miguellopez3392
@miguellopez3392 3 роки тому
very minorly, some people have operated them with almost a foot of snow on top, since their satellites are much closer they can use frequency bands that pass through clouds and precipitation.
@zlt4lt4zz71
@zlt4lt4zz71 3 роки тому
Waiting on start link ipo🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 🔥🔥💯💯💯🤙🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👌🏽👍🏽 Can't wait to get starlink🤤🤤🤤
@MakeAmericaLit
@MakeAmericaLit 3 роки тому
Damn, I misread the title and thought it said Starkist, I was trying to figure out what the hell did canned tunafish had to do with space travel smh.
@Blitznstitch2
@Blitznstitch2 3 роки тому
Can these also be used to monitor for meteors and aliens?
@leodahvee
@leodahvee 3 роки тому
Starlink here in the Philippines would be a game changer. Our country has one of the slowest internet speeds in Asia, and probably the world. Even in our urban areas, we experience slow speeds, and I just can't imagine the speeds of those who have internet access and live in more rural areas. And then there are Filipinos who have absolutely no internet access, who live on mountain tops or on islands. That's why I was ecstatic when I heard Starlink will be operating here in 2022.
@leodahvee
@leodahvee 3 роки тому
@Jeffrey Long Im pretty sure censorship isn't that much of a problem here right now. Yeah our government has some pretty undemocratic characteristics but generally, we are a democratic country. Pretty sure they'll allow starlink.
@junchi6151
@junchi6151 3 роки тому
wait till the government double tax u
@ValliNayagamChokkalingam
@ValliNayagamChokkalingam 3 роки тому
Interesting Video! Thank You CNBC! Big fan of CNBC from India!
@RANDsreviews
@RANDsreviews 3 роки тому
That’s the same thing Negative People said about Tesla. Those other satellite Internet companies didn’t have Elon musk
@johntarbell5252
@johntarbell5252 3 роки тому
Just ran a sppedtest about 3 hours ago using starlink. 308 MBPS down 8 up. The service interruptions are minimal and the pings are usually in the 30s
@alterego157
@alterego157 3 роки тому
Why is up so slow?
@subhobroto
@subhobroto 3 роки тому
30 ms
@motherbrain1112
@motherbrain1112 3 роки тому
Falcon9 launches 60 Starlink at once. Starship will launch 400 at a MUCH LOWER cost (10x less expansive) . Starship is also designed to be reused completely at a rapid pace. Starship will completely change the game once its operationnal. I dont see how competitor will be able to compete...
@graullas8981
@graullas8981 3 роки тому
Yes, Starship will make every rocket company obsolete at this point IF THEY DELIVER to the ultra low price. I think they will and we will have star trek in real life (with one main launch operator weirdly).
@vineets
@vineets 3 роки тому
Other companies will use starship to deploy! Like how companies use AWS for hosting their services. (AWS was started by Amazon to fulfill their needs.)
@bighands69
@bighands69 2 роки тому
@Motherbrain I will explain how competitors will be able to play in the marketplace. SpaceX is opening up its launch business to the marketplace. I suspect how this will play out is that SpaceX will not build the entire network up there and that it will have an infrastructure that will be owned by multiple corporations. Clearly SpaceX will be a major player in that realm. I am currently building ground level infrastructure and have plans for next generation scaled networks on the ground. Exciting times ahead.
@krzysztofmeler
@krzysztofmeler 2 роки тому
1. Starship is not a functional rocket nowhere soon. 2. The rocket fuel is expensive, fuel makes majority of the rockets' weight, it's heavy rocket so it is sensible to use it only for the packages that fully utilizes it abilities. 3. I do not see FAA to allow to reuse rocket without proper inspection before each launch, check how airplanes are checked, they literally has some parts replaced even if still functioning good, and making functional rocket with similar % of failures hasn't been reached even for long-existing rockets. In summary: it is not going to happen, they do not event have deployment system of packages for this starship and the works on it are going very slow compared to Musk's words (see 2022-23 mars cargo missions).
@ldIezz
@ldIezz 3 роки тому
This is bigger than we can think internet on ever inch of earth has tons of applications
@gernotfischer7908
@gernotfischer7908 3 роки тому
@yep: just think of MH370. If every Airplane in the Future has broadband internet via Starlink. you know exactly where the plan lost connection and was going down.
@JohnSmith-rf1tx
@JohnSmith-rf1tx 3 роки тому
4:06 - Yes, it's true that, because they orbit at a lower altitude, Starlink satellites can see less of the Earth at any one time than a satellite at 36,000 km altitude. But that is absolutely NOT the reason why SpaceX needs so many satellites for Starlink. The actual reason is simple orbital mechanics. Because SpaceX is using a Low Earth Orbit, their satellites aren't geostationary and don't remain over the same area of the Earth all the time. Each satellite is completing a full orbit of the Earth in about 95 minutes. Any single satellite is therefore only visible from a ground terminal for a few minutes at a time (about 3-6 minutes) before it passes over the horizon. In order to provide constant, continuous connectivity then, SpaceX needs enough satellites so that at least one is always visible from the ground anywhere in their coverage area. This takes A LOT of satellites.
@bighands69
@bighands69 2 роки тому
If the world wants fast easy internet then it will require such a system as Starlink.
@michelsavoie6971
@michelsavoie6971 2 роки тому
I'm lucky to have Starlink for the last 2 weeks. Works great. I have the original Dishy. works great after a snow storm.
@thomasboomer9809
@thomasboomer9809 3 роки тому
I ordered one for the Beta. It's slated to come some time in July or so they say. I ordered it because the tech is cool and the profits will help SpaceX develop transportation to Mars. I have pretty good cable right now but it sure has it's share of problems often enough. I plan to run them side by side before cutting off the cable.
@ThinkSleepLeave
@ThinkSleepLeave 3 роки тому
I have a hydroponic farm that is highly automated and I had to rely on crappy cellular service for remote monitoring. Watching cameras was impossible remotely. Now with starlink my 6 acre farm just realised the true potential!
@RasakBlood
@RasakBlood 3 роки тому
Starlink will have no competition. Because no other company can lunch their satellites at cost with partly reusable rockets as spacex do. Like how do you match that cost reduction advantage?
@heyreddy6033
@heyreddy6033 3 роки тому
ukposts.info/have/v-deo/gHd7g6Zrm3qLuYU.html
@TheSirjull891
@TheSirjull891 3 роки тому
Actually well made. Good job!!
@fiveoh1927
@fiveoh1927 3 роки тому
Once New Glenn is flying, Amazon can.
@adamanderson3042
@adamanderson3042 3 роки тому
@@DrAustinThomas What? What would the argument be for doing that? Why would people want to subsidise all of internet infrastructure so that it is cost competitive with Starlink when the exact same amount of money would be even better put to use just subsidising starlink. Subsidising regular internet companies to be compete with starlink would be like spending trillions of dollars each year subsidising horse and cart companies so that they can compete with trucks, trains and cargo ships. Unless you mean subsiding the regular internet companies to build their own constellations, then that makes sense.
@mani92__
@mani92__ 3 роки тому
@Bruce wayne same speed? you joking, india is one of the worse country connectivity wise, only in few places you get good speed and by good i mean decent
@dom_toredo
@dom_toredo Рік тому
How can we download the app and put the dosh where the app tells us to put when we don't have any internet to begin with.
@pyro530916
@pyro530916 3 роки тому
B roll of someone trying to manually tilt dishy ... I just died a little inside.
@crazymodder2
@crazymodder2 3 роки тому
I have luckily been a beta tester sine Jan 2021 and this had been an absolute game changer. Before i was on an unreliable lte hotspot. I do get drop outs here and there but has substantially gotten better every month. Thank you so much spacex!!!!
@raphaeldouglas9361
@raphaeldouglas9361 2 роки тому
Successful people don't become that way overnight. What most people see at a glance-wealth, a great career, purpose-is the result of hard work and hustle over time.
@peterbedley2719
@peterbedley2719 2 роки тому
Yeah! I agree with you sir.
@peterbedley2719
@peterbedley2719 2 роки тому
If you want to be successful have the mindset of the rich, spend less and invest More. Don't give up your dreams.
@michealdouglas8206
@michealdouglas8206 2 роки тому
@@peterbedley2719 People come here with the aim of chasing money more than knowledge and that will damage your progress, trust me. Chase knowledge first and I promise! The money will follow you just like it's following some of us now.
@christophercook7170
@christophercook7170 2 роки тому
@@michealdouglas8206 That's very correct sir!! And that is why most of them end up losing they money to scammers.
@christophercook7170
@christophercook7170 2 роки тому
Don't be in a haste to invest. Know what and who you are investing to and be sure that the person will deliver before investing.
@TheYoyozo
@TheYoyozo 3 роки тому
So how exactly does one download the app? Might want to plan ahead.
@pukes6273
@pukes6273 2 роки тому
Starlink turns SpaceX to a direct to consumers company. That's key.
@bighands69
@bighands69 2 роки тому
It could turn them into a trillion dollar company and that would be a good thing for space exploration. But I think they will not be the only trillion dollar company in on the game.
@alexanderphilip1809
@alexanderphilip1809 3 роки тому
How and Why videos from cnbc are always informative. Keep up the good work guys.
@mvmlego1212
@mvmlego1212 3 роки тому
Agreed. This is the only program produced by a cable television network that I'll watch. I don't necessarily have a grudge against any of the other companies, but this is the only show that I've found to be apolitical, lacking filler, and not afraid to get into the details.
@derekrowan2788
@derekrowan2788 3 роки тому
Great idea for remote area access. However, Currently @ 4/2021 $700 equipment cost & $135p/mth for Starlink in Downunder 🇦🇺
@chrisbraid2907
@chrisbraid2907 2 роки тому
Yeah I’m in Kalgoorlie on nbn and it’s way cheaper … as a senior I can’t afford the upgrade but I’m glad that the richer locals can have the Starlink option to free up nbn bandwidth … dear fast internet is like the new phone market …
@crytkryssus9851
@crytkryssus9851 3 роки тому
Holy crap I wish this had been around when I was growing up in my rural ass hometown.
@chrisbraid2907
@chrisbraid2907 2 роки тому
Great if you can afford it …
@Bre3zZyChil1z
@Bre3zZyChil1z 3 роки тому
Starlink might be popular in my area just due to its price. Although we have fast internet where I live, its a monopoly in the area so prices are high.
@bighands69
@bighands69 2 роки тому
It is a monopoly because of the infrastructure development costs and regulations that inhibit growth.
@chrisr2507
@chrisr2507 3 роки тому
Can’t wait to get mine!
@magnussorensen2565
@magnussorensen2565 3 роки тому
I think Musk is aware of the space debris situation and when Starship is ready it could be used to take down old satellites when they fail.
@jamesx4452
@jamesx4452 3 роки тому
That was the first thing that came to mind. More space junk will be significant.
@pictobloxer5412
@pictobloxer5412 3 роки тому
Ion engines are equipped to change its orbit but if that fails then something will have to capture it
@leonidhadnuk9305
@leonidhadnuk9305 3 роки тому
Yeah RIGHT!!! He’s gonna just (simply) take them down??? He’s gonna use HIS MONEY & go to the trouble, time & expense to TAKE THEM DOWN??? PLEEASSE!!!
@jamesx4452
@jamesx4452 3 роки тому
@@leonidhadnuk9305 😂 I concur. Most companies will not incur such a significant expense and the trouble to gather trash. A good example would be Direct TV and Dish Network leaving their satellites on your when you cancel their service. Just imagine millions of starlink and it’s competitors working and non working satellites in space. How are space shuttles going travel safely during their space tours?
@MrYdady
@MrYdady 3 роки тому
The biggest issue on long term is the space debris pollution as is not completely clear which is the effect that the interaction between the resulting debris and outermost layers off atmosphere is known. All this needs studied seriously.
@j4m32hz6
@j4m32hz6 3 роки тому
I watched them launch those satellites and it was pretty phenomenal
@wonllasidogwonk6297
@wonllasidogwonk6297 3 роки тому
I'm from New Zealand and starlink isn't available here? Always says from mid to late 2021 when you try signing up...
@ebonheart730
@ebonheart730 3 роки тому
When it’s available in my country I plan on getting it for my cabin.
@RasakBlood
@RasakBlood 3 роки тому
@Alex Berkman Yea thats cute. And in reality most people love being able to go out during the day and then spend the evening indoors with the fire going and surfing on their tablet in the sofa. Best of both worlds is the point.
@adipokhrel1663
@adipokhrel1663 3 роки тому
@Alex Berkman how are u commenting then??
@VNV67
@VNV67 3 роки тому
I signed up in February and I am still waiting. I am in Florida and I am wondering when it will get here. SOON I HOPE...
@sageakporherhe783
@sageakporherhe783 3 роки тому
3:33 I love this animation.
@ardentdfender4116
@ardentdfender4116 3 роки тому
I’m wondering. Can you have a Starlink account connection. Setup some server connections and then broadcast it to some people that live close to you in a remote area like a WAN - Wide Area Network. Your basically like an ISP in that very remote area? I understand at this point there is a limitation of the download and upload speed.
@gianni.santi.
@gianni.santi. 3 роки тому
You'll need range extenders. It's possible.
@woodiewoodmen2306
@woodiewoodmen2306 2 роки тому
Wait a second... download an app to install the gear, but... it's ment for people who have a crappy or no connection in their area :'). Big supporter though!
@80fire71
@80fire71 3 роки тому
It seems that you can now connect to the Internet even in places that seem to be the ends of the earth, right?
@markfroelich4743
@markfroelich4743 3 роки тому
One item overlooked regarding the space debris problem is that because these satellites are so much closer to the ground, even if they lose communication with the satellite, it will still de orbit at a more reasonable time than current internet satellites that are way up higher sitting in a geostationary orbit.
@ThaiEgho
@ThaiEgho 2 роки тому
How are you gonna download and use the app, if you dont have internet?
@LordCoeCoe
@LordCoeCoe 3 роки тому
Starlink is obviously gonna be the future, definitely on other planets/moons.
@davidrice5288
@davidrice5288 2 роки тому
Especially when AI allows the satellite s to perform as a singular swarm
@krzysztofmeler
@krzysztofmeler 2 роки тому
@@davidrice5288 AI is not required to do this, normal algorithms are eanought.
@krzysztofmeler
@krzysztofmeler 2 роки тому
How are they gona deploy hundrets of satielites over orbits of different planets/moons and about which of the solar system celestial bodies do you speak? Definitelly better option is to put 3-4 satellites on stationary orbits of those cause speed and latency is not the most important thing over mars or other planets/moons, especially because without protection against cosmit radiation those starlink networks over mars etc. would be dead after short time, even over earth planned lifetime is only 5 years.
@thomwescott5760
@thomwescott5760 3 роки тому
What astronomers (at least the ones that hack piece reporters are talking to) are missing is that when Starlink funds Starship in the next two or three years optical and radio observatories in Earth and Lunar orbits will be cheaper, faster to build, and much larger than anything on Earth.
@snuffeldjuret
@snuffeldjuret 3 роки тому
yeah in the longer run, this has to be the superior alternative for astronomy.
@snuffeldjuret
@snuffeldjuret 3 роки тому
@@murkdurk8961 and this is why normal people think astronomers are just babies. Out of curiosity, what do you think you accomplish with such a comment?
@aconite72
@aconite72 3 роки тому
Still, for supposedly being so smart and "for the advancement of humanity", most astronomers that complained have a disgusting lack of regard for the common people without access to even ADEQUATE Internet service. All they seemingly care about is the pristineness of their night sky and how it can please and benefit THEM, not others. As much as I love space, I would gladly give up the night sky if it means somewhere else in the world, a 12 years-old in a rural area has the Internet they need to join their Zoom class. When I first heard how "outraged" astronomers were about Starlink, I was abhorred that the scientific community could be so selfish.
@SyedMehdiX
@SyedMehdiX 3 роки тому
Love these mini documentaries
@timothyweakly2496
@timothyweakly2496 3 роки тому
I hope I get this service soon. My current service actually downgraded after over a decade of service lol.
@timothyweakly2496
@timothyweakly2496 3 роки тому
@Sfs rocket lab I don't know. I called them and they didn't know either why. I somewhat got it resolved. But it's not the 12 down I was getting but 10. But I was only getting 6 when they lowered it lol. Goodness I pray starlink comes quickly.
@icemanleo
@icemanleo 3 роки тому
If ISPs are not worried, they should!
@icemanleo
@icemanleo 3 роки тому
Sure... that is until your cell phone company hits you with data caps or overcharges
@icemanleo
@icemanleo 3 роки тому
Also obviously you did not listen to all of the video as the example could not get cell reception. Think big simpleton
@XOPOIIIO
@XOPOIIIO 3 роки тому
It's a quadrillion billion multidollar business. I think the money will be enough to send a billion colonists to Alpha Centauri.
@akyhne
@akyhne 3 роки тому
If they are not overselling the bandwidth (which they probably will), there's only room for a few million users on Starlink. That's only an income of a few billions per year.
@Daniela-pr7rz
@Daniela-pr7rz 3 роки тому
They are making iterations to expend the bandwidth. Plus, not everybody needs a lot in the same time. The important thing for most users is to be able to stream without buffering.
@akyhne
@akyhne 3 роки тому
@@Daniela-pr7rz They can't raise the bandwidth for already launched satellites. And their application to the FCC only allows the current satellites. And you are wrong about just being able to stream. That's not what they are promising their users.
@Daniela-pr7rz
@Daniela-pr7rz 3 роки тому
@@akyhne They are promising users internet in remote locations and they deliver. People with no internet and 1-20Mbts download are getting a better deal with Starlink. As for bandwidth of satellites, they will burn in atmosphere in 5 years and be replaced with ever new ones with better capabilities. They said estimated revenue of aprox $30 bill/ year in 2025. It might not be that big but obviously they expect tens of millions of customers at least.
@akyhne
@akyhne 3 роки тому
@@Daniela-pr7rz 30 billion in revenue? Are you kidding me?! That would mean a user base of 300 million users! I suggest you do some research and some math, and you'll find they can't have much more, than a few million users.
@josephy8
@josephy8 3 роки тому
12 mo in the upload is 100 times better than in my country
@spacexsays3227
@spacexsays3227 3 роки тому
it's has nothing to do with uploads. We are simply spraying the skies with a more efficient way.
@fa6805
@fa6805 3 роки тому
I've been hearing about Blue Origin and One Web's constellations since 2019. It's 2021 already, though.
@ExcessumGaming
@ExcessumGaming 3 роки тому
The Satelites for Starlink are in such a low orbit that they will burn in atmosphere on their own within 5y w/o any need for extra propulsion. Its funny that they did not mention that. Kesler Syndrome mostly is related to Satelites that are on the standard orbits that are 20x-1000x higher where they can stay in orbit for thousands of years or forever.
@davis.fourohfour
@davis.fourohfour 3 роки тому
Intentionally meant to fall. They'll replace each with better, constantly.
@Maadhawk
@Maadhawk 3 роки тому
I think the astronomers, and I love space and astronomy, are going to have to give up the ghost and accept that the commercialization of space will spell the end of ground based large scale observations. It is inevitable. But, that same commercialization should enable the construction of space-scopes more than ever at much cheaper price points.
@thomwescott5760
@thomwescott5760 3 роки тому
Assembling the James Webb Space Telescope on orbit (Earth/Luna L2) with a couple charted Starships would have made it ten times cheaper and five times larger.
@Maadhawk
@Maadhawk 3 роки тому
@@thomwescott5760 Not even that. There is a novel by John Ringo who explores building things on a massive scale. It is called "Live Free or Die". Earth has been invaded by aliens, or rather, our solar system has been and humans are being used as slave labor to mine our own world. At least to a point. A competing alien power protects some of us and it is in that, that the story grows. To get rid of the bad aliens and secure our system, the main character builds a giant array of small mirrors. Each one is only about a meter in diameter. Pretty small. But, he builds them in the millions. Along the way, they talk about how if they weren't needed for defense and industry, those some mirrors, while pretty crap on their own, collectively made the most powerful and refined telescope ever. We could do the same. Build hundreds of small cheap mirrors and fit them with a standard "sat pack" station keeping system and put them into orbit about the sun and out of the plane of the ecliptic. These mirrors would collect light and focus it on a central mirror which would then beam it back to our space observatory. This would vastly amplify our scope power at a fraction of the cost.
@kevintreadaway6769
@kevintreadaway6769 3 роки тому
Can it be moved ? Under 10 miles?
@paoloangelino24
@paoloangelino24 3 роки тому
Imagine we started with dial up internet, and now we'll be getting wifi from outer space. 🚀
@nodehead9475
@nodehead9475 3 роки тому
I really doubt the experts are suggesting 2k for the dish 😂😂
@Diggnuts
@Diggnuts 3 роки тому
Well, recent reports say they reduced the BOM and fab to sub 1.5K, so initial 2K would have not been far off.
@kazedcat
@kazedcat 3 роки тому
Teardown of the dish shows that it is a giant PCB with hundreds of RF microchips. It is very expensive and bringing the cost down to below $1500 is already a big achievement. Phase Array Antenna is no joke.
@Rainbowsaur
@Rainbowsaur 3 роки тому
apparently it used to be nearly 3grand to make.
@wenwin7038
@wenwin7038 3 роки тому
Its great work,, why not everyone of us from any country share our ideas,
@akyhne
@akyhne 3 роки тому
Why? We have fiber broadband...
@wenwin7038
@wenwin7038 3 роки тому
@@akyhne fiber broadband? I mean to have ideas from every perspective,every field,
@thomwescott5760
@thomwescott5760 3 роки тому
Because with the internet, bad ideas travel just as fast as good ideas.
@siddharthkalantri5076
@siddharthkalantri5076 3 роки тому
If U make Great Coffee . Imagine how boreing world be if everyone drink only coffee .
@wenwin7038
@wenwin7038 3 роки тому
@@thomwescott5760 ofcourse bad ideas also travel that's why people losses millions to scammers every month. Real friends are rare, fake are everywhere if true people unites,,then right ideas will be produced
@aaxxcdd
@aaxxcdd 3 роки тому
" ..at the speed of light rather than whatever the speed is on the ground. ". :D
@timmydavidsmith
@timmydavidsmith 3 роки тому
Already sounds better than my xfinity internet
@thomwescott5760
@thomwescott5760 3 роки тому
It is, believe me. Calling Comcast to cancel was easily my happiest moment in all of 2020.
@gyrateful
@gyrateful 3 роки тому
"100% better then nothing." That is how the editors of this video ended it. Somebody has an Elonian sense of humor.
@splice247
@splice247 3 роки тому
Im 15min from a major town with fast broadband, i have one option for Dsl and its os extremely unreliable and slow. Pay for 30mbs and rarely get above 15 when it isnt dropping out
@doncimarro7947
@doncimarro7947 3 роки тому
For those concerned about satellites colliding, here is my take. You are basing those concerns (or in some cases fears) on the fact that collisions are very common down here on earth. First, these collisions happen MOSTLY in densely populated areas (whether the population is that of people or objects) and this is mainly due to the fact that about 50% of the earth's surface (could be more or less) is barely populated since it's either covered by ice, mountains, deserts, forests or seas. This is why stampedes are more common that car collisions, and car collisions more common than boat collisions which in turn are more common than airplane collisions. In space, the total surface area (a.k.a earth's circumference) is much much more than that on the surface or even the air when planes fly. This means that if starlink satellites are about equally spaced, the distance between one and the other is a few kilometers which means less chance of collision. If one satellites goes rogue, the others can still dodge it. There has been a few times when countries for whatever reason thought it wise to shoot down satellites in space from the ground, the most recent one being India. Of course that resulted in hundreds if not thousands of small fast moving pieces scattered in space. It has been a few years since that incident and here we are, the kessler effect wasn't triggered, satellites are still being launched and some people don't even know or care it happened! What's my point? Space is so damn big that SpaceX could decide to launch 400,000 more satellites, and our airspace would still have more traffic than low earth orbit (ok, maybe 400k is too high a number, but still). ps. I didn't do any calculations so these figures are not accurate but they are not far fetched either.
@bighands69
@bighands69 2 роки тому
In low earth orbit there is an area of space of about 500 million to 3 billion square kilometers that the satellites can exist within. I do not think most people understand how large space actually is. The area of orbit of the moon around earth is about 1.8 trillion square kilometers.
@ltlewis15
@ltlewis15 3 роки тому
This plays like a long commercial with commercials but I'm interested in starlink now.
@PassportGaming
@PassportGaming 3 роки тому
@6:40 Elon has already tweeted how much the dish costs them to make
@MrChiefsmaster
@MrChiefsmaster 3 роки тому
and how much?
@PassportGaming
@PassportGaming 3 роки тому
@@MrChiefsmaster Idk. Go check his tweets. I didn’t want to memorize useless info so I forgot. Something like 2 or 3k but he said they’re reducing its cost rapidly
@defnotaghost6460
@defnotaghost6460 3 роки тому
Biniam Gaming 1,500 Dollars do be exact, that’s what he tweeted
@realBeltalowda
@realBeltalowda 3 роки тому
SpaceX isn’t going to stop, by interfering with ground based astronomy operations, they are, in effect, creating customers for their launch capabilities essentially “the era of ground-based astronomical observations is over, we must evolve and put our observatories in space now that reusable launch vehicles are relatively cheap and effective.” Let’s just hope they make Starlink a B-Corp when it goes public so that it maintains legal protections from their shareholders so they can continue benefiting humanity, their employees, and be mindful of their impacts to the environment and other ethical issues that arise as they grow.
@TamimLB
@TamimLB 3 роки тому
Africa is waiting so excitedly for this.
@JRay2113
@JRay2113 3 роки тому
CNBC be killin’ with these mini docs
How SpaceX Could Win The Space Race | CNBC Marathon
57:39
CNBC
Переглядів 2,4 млн
You’ve Never Seen A Race Like This 🚀
00:21
Red Bull
Переглядів 38 млн
Артем Пивоваров х Klavdia Petrivna - Барабан
03:16
Artem Pivovarov
Переглядів 1,7 млн
Why Microsoft Keeps Beating Apple And Google With Windows
17:44
The Hyperloop May Disrupt More Than Just Travel
19:23
Bloomberg Originals
Переглядів 4,4 млн
China’s Looming Crises | CNBC Marathon
33:49
CNBC
Переглядів 120 тис.
Why SpaceX is Making Starlink
16:01
Real Engineering
Переглядів 7 млн
Starlink Gen3 In-Depth Setup and Review
18:03
Crosstalk Solutions
Переглядів 725 тис.
Is Nuclear Fusion The Answer To Clean Energy?
22:53
CNBC
Переглядів 3,9 млн
Wolfram Physics Project Launch
3:50:19
Wolfram
Переглядів 1,4 млн
Why U.S. Cities Are Going Broke
10:58
CNBC
Переглядів 404 тис.