That’s just cruise control

And the horse won’t crash into a parked car or a crossing trailer

@@oshguru Neither will Tesla Autopilot suddenly decide to kick a random person on road

Horses have navigate on autopilot. They will not walk straight but rather will navigate back to the barn. However, it is highly recommended that the rider should be paying attention and in control. So the anslogy with Tesla is pretty good.

Whats their 0 to 60?

Or Chucky(2019) controlling self-driving car by using 5g network with his finger.

There are safety issues , FTD is still in beta mode and people are idiots and Tesla has to deal with all of that thats why its taking too long. Video explains that

It literally is the 80/20 or 90/10 rule but CNBC failed to mention even that. It's not that hard to research. But first, let's have CNBC talk about how dangerous Tesla's are and all the lawsuits people have against Tesla!

Derek Liu How are Tesla’s dangerous? I get there may be accidents where autopilot was involved, but those are all human errors, Tesla can’t stop someone taking control and crashing. Plus they’ve got 5 stars safety rating in every catagory.

You wouldn't get a real answer from Tesla, the stock price would plummet. It could be anything. Maybe they even realised that they have to switch to llidar, it would set them years back and the stock price would plummet. Musk always plays the same game of giving information piece by piece but still giving a new ETA so that his shareholders hold on to something. If he says end of 2021, it is certainly NOT end of 2021.

People call it a lier.

If Blizzard made EVs

at0201 He’s trying to solve one of the most difficult tech challenges of the present era, but he has successfully sent two men to the International Space Station in a first for any private company in history of space exploration. Cut him some slack champ.

Decades late is NOT, in substance, anything like he's claiming, especially re SELLING something that is nowhere NEAR close to ready. It's called fraud. Per the video, he's been claiming a cross country hands free drive in the US since 2014. They're STILL nowhere close to that, for example. No problem with them working on it. BIG problem with Musk making MATERIAL misstatements on it, again, and again, and again.

Problem with Elon is he announces grand ideas or goals without actually knowing if he can do it. He intentionally hypes his products with features they dont currently have in order to stay relevant. Hes no different to sleazy car salesman at a dealership

Expertise is defined by results, not by words

So is Steve Jobs! He lost his life because he was clueless about nutrition, also was clueless in parenting and socializing. A successful person is the one who can balance all aspects of life

@@hanisolaqa Hm.. I have yet to see a very successful persona with a balanced life. Its not possible by design.

.

👏🏼

Also robo soldier.....

Complete autonomous driving isn't a joke that you can make every weekend on twitter. Sure you can make the car drive itself on certain specific areas which have been mapped, but making a complete self driving car that can do so on every street on the planet will at least take 10 yrs. Plus i ain't buying tesla, their cars always have some horrible manufacturing defects, three of my friends returned their NEW TESLAs, one returned his model Y this month I mean musk working for environment and all is good, but i won't lay my hand on tesla unless they solve this issue. Guess Elon should spend more time in his companies than on twitter.

Facts

@@aaronstone6183 I'm personally fine if it's just some small or minor defect, ice periodic maintenance is nightmare when compared to that

If I were you I'd worry more about food production. Not everybody drives, and those who do don't drive everyday, but we ALL eat several times a day. You should also worry about, oh I don't know, anything and everything the oil industry builds. No oversight at all, in there, thanks to lobbyists. Getting killed by a rogue Tesla is about is likely as getting eaten by a shark, and also about equality exaggerated in the news.

Thanks I currently paused video at 0:03 . You saved my time.

Right!!

This is literally just a summary of what’s been going on with Tesla and their beginnings with autopilot. Should’ve changed the title to “How Tesla’s autopilot got to the way it is now”

Thanks, I was already two minutes in

This video just saying to you. No autopilot yet, not in near future.

Personally I don't it's possible. There are endless possibilities of situations and AI is too slow to figure out answers in seconds. When a self driving car gets in an accident who is responsible ? Would be a legal quagmire.

@@zebratangozebra "AI is too slow"? The computer used can perform 36.86 trillion operations per second (TOPS). That does not seen slow to me. I do agree there endless possibilities of situations. But like a human, AI doesn't know what to do if it has never had to deal with it before. The major advantage with Tesla's autopilot, is a car driving in Germany that has to deal with something new, can teach the AI algorithm and improve the driving of all Tesla cars.

@@jonwally2002 That computer is FAST. Disagree that a human doesn't know what to do in a situation it has never dealt with before, people do that all the time. Was thinking the AI was taking the part in those situations to find solutions, does it?

@@zebratangozebra If you teach AI it will naturally act much faster than a human. Also we should group situations in categories from dailies to unique. If you teach AI 90% of situation that occurs on the roads THAT will be a turning point. And I think with so much data that Tesla have it will be possible.

zebratangozebra do you know anything about computers? No it’s not slow it’s fast as all hell i would think the main problem is the legal process of getting something like this all of its certifications not a lot of ways a car can crash other then a human being bad at driving the only real thing would be something in the car going wrong

Who is behind the scenes who wants the price to drop ? Goldman Sachs? They have a lot of stock in NIO and downloaded NIO possibly because they want to buy more so they can make as much money as Ron Baron did on Tesla. The money tells all.

Matt Falcon Elon musk literally says the stocks are too high and they just go up higher not that he would be any poorer of stocks went down he probably has 100 million cash stock piled in a safe

tbh sadly its working! F CNBC

CNBC is probably funded by an oil company or by a competing car company.

@Ziggi Mon I said probably, I didn't say they certainly are.

they didnt because this video just plain presentation of what is observed, so you have to make your own conclution. Pushing something toward the watcher isn't that good

They did maybe your comprehension is just low?

thx, now I don't need to finish watching it. CNBC doing a crappy job again.

@@PinoyReactMedia its kinda yes and no. They did this so viewer can chose to believe or not, yet they didn't explicitly say so

Yo i posted a comment with 93 likes 10 hours ago how do u have more likes it your thumbnail is int ti

No it's not possible can't even see in the rain or snow. What a joke maybe in 15 years lol

Also people trust self driving more than they should and tesla is not investing in driver monitoring

yea not because artificial intelligence is complex or anything lol

@@pancakeforbreakfast3828 Well Musk shouldn't be talking like this self driving technology will be here now. It's half assed at best right now getting people killed. 🤔

@@jamesblunt1915 its half assed because a person with no understanding for programming and engineering says so? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔and blame musk for what? warning people not to sleep with self drive on? its called common sense man.

Dizy Tizy actually a plane can land itself

When I was a student pilot, I flew a Cessna 172 with Autopilot features on a short 1 hour round-trip flight. After taking off and enabling the AP to guide me back to my final destination, the AP decided to throw itself in a 45 degree turning dive. Of course I quickly recovered the plane since I'm not an idiot. This is the exact reason why pilots still exist in spite of autopilot, and why none of these Telsa crashes were the fault of the autopilot feature, but simply driver negligence.

modern autopilot systems can do everything except take off . I fly the airbus a320 and that's a plane that came in to service in the 80s . the a320 will climb , cruise , navigate , descend and land the plane without pilot intervention. ofcourse constant monitoring is required cause things may go wrong and that is where flight data monitoring and cockpit voice recording comes into play as ( driver monitoring ) systems to make sure the pilots are always paying attention . and yes before you comment the flight data recordings are regularly used to ensure full compliance and not just in the event of a crash or an incident.In my company there is 100 percent flight data monitoring . so yeah as goos as Tesla fsd is , some kind of better driver monitoring systems are needed as no driver input or monitoring systems are a long way away . . . . .

Good job pls join our marketing team so that we can educate you what to say and what not to say in public.

That means plane manufacturers have been misleading as well. Say what you want, but autopilot implies an autonomous pilot.

Currently, it's a driver assist feature. So you have a combination of human and computer driving. With FSD you take one of those away again.

@@Hans-gb4mv Correct, using the current autopilot would probably crash 1000% more than humans. Although we do not know what their current software can do.

@@christophedobbels4890 The actual statistics say far differently, in fact almost the opposite

@@j.pgoodwin9020 People don't talk in actual statistics on the Internet. Made-up ones are far more effective at making you sound right when you aren't. I agree with you though. I always laugh at people that say cameras and radar can't drive a car. People use eyes and lack radar and manage it alright with far slower reaction speeds than computers can do. Sure, a virgin software system won't manage to keep up with a human but when you have as many data collection points as Tesla does all feeding into the same artificial learning network it will not take long for those computer systems to far surpass any capabilities a human could ever muster especially when assisted with radar. I'd love for Tesla to incorporate some sort of hive network with their cars where they all talk to eachother in relatively real time to feed one another traffic and accident data to better improve road utilization and travel times. The most frustrating thing I see when I drive is a main artery utterly clogged with traffic while side streets and other routes are wide open and clear. A system like Tesla's would be ideal for managing this and improving infrastructure throughput.

@@iMeatbag Just as Mercedes 's one?

well journalisms not life and death now is it

I would compare them to the inquisition in the dark ages, while they are untouchable because they only "report facts", they have the power to destroy individual lives and companies and they will never held responsible for the things they do because they have managed to convince people that the freedom of the press is the same thing as the freedom to lie, distort and destroy.

They didn't take money from you for watching the video.

@@thegoonist Yes, it is. The 26 letters they have in their arsenal are the most powerful weapon known to men. They can be used to build up, give hope and life, and they can be used to destroy, spread despair and death. Sad to say, but journalism is using them more and more in a destroying way.

machelvet well first, the causality between words and death is not as clear nor direct as with the case with Tesla. Second, with such a broad definition anything could be harmful. Letters are a tool. Tesla is a tool. It can be good or bad. It’s how humans use it that’s the issue. Educate the humans.

Building autonomous vehicle system is like building Google x10 but when you get page 404 someone dies.

This must go an Reddit

Wjat they are building is a judgemental system to be able to tell the difference between things in the road .. like how one born without knowing anything then you learn .... they are now in the learning stage

Draxla AMB pretending to be Yoda

@@shinyramen le reddit moment detected

The FUD is real.

tesla cars care 1000000000000000% more likey to randomly combust,normal cars wont do that.

@@joji3991 You're seriously trying to say petrol cars never catch fire? Especially after an accident? 🤣😂🤣 ICE cars catch fire FAR more often than electric cars. The statistics are publicly available.

@@marcobartz1879 did I say during an accident?I said randomly.like in a garage just parked randomly while driving,or while being charged

@@joji3991 people wearing tinfoil hats are 1000000000000000000000000% more likely to get struck by lightning ⚡ I guess they should go hide under a rock instead of walk around!

I'll wait for when they say where is Toyota, GM, Ford. I'll give most OEMs 1yr. then bankrupt.

So true

Lol

Yes!

Started and stopped 3 times.. Shouldn't have even written this. Well played Sir.

This comment section is full Tesla fanboys who come In Their pant every time they seen elon

And make it full of half-truths, innuendo, false assumptions, and sensationalism as usual. And a clickbaity, misleading title.

Free advertising thank you cnbc

Fax it’s new technology so it’s gonna take long and he wants it to be perfect and no errors

But I want it NOW MOMMY NOW!!!!

bruh they can't lol, i mean they can't even make a simple video to answer a simple question lol and i just wanna say "this video is taking so long"

All good only problem is that teslas evaluation is all based around it.. cut the stock price in half then sure. Teslas stock is inflated based on his fantasy talk and CGI presentations same with space X and his other scamy operations

Can anyone still believe NASA and the world thought landing an orbital rocket was impossible?

Promise things and push them further and further, say that other manufacturers are dumb because they use LIDAR... to be honest is not so good to me.

Elon and capitalism: a breath of fresh air! Bean counters beware!

No they dont

@@CrazyDog3212 then why are all other automakers suddenly rushing to make electric vehicles? 🤔

Tesla has Level 2: partial automation Volvo has level 2: partial automation Mercedes achieved level 3: conditional automation Google (Waymo) is Level 4: high automation Level 5: Fully autonomous (no one yet) Tesla is the only one that misleads it’s customers that they are buying a level 5 system by naming it ‘autopilot’. Other car manufacturers give you a warning to keep your hands on the steering wheel and wake you up if you are asleep with an infrared camera. Tesla doesn’t have these safeguards in place. They are so eager to make profit out of this that they release its autonomous system without adequate trials and warnings. Google spent the last years trialing it and spending millions dollars in order not to have any deaths. So they are a responsible company not Tesla.

@@Krasides Actual autopilot used in planes isn't fully self flying.

@@Krasides If you actually read about Tesla's autopilot you'd know that it warns you every 5s to keep hands on the wheel whilst on autopilot and if you do not, it rings an alarm and you're not allowed to drive on autopilot for the rest of the drive. Tesla owner here.

@@Krasides Teslas have audible warnings and alerts when you don't have your hands on the wheel. I don't know about the cameras bit. Could they have named it something else, sure, but it's also our responsibility as a consumer to understand what one is buying, especially when state of the art. Yes a company should fully disclose these things but at least Tesla and others are trying to progress in it.

Hi Justin I agree with you but on airplanes it’s 95% there. You can activate the autopilot after take off and it can take you until the final approach depending on what category the airport ILS system is. With the vehicles it’s a much more complex system because the infrastructure (roads) need to be in a good condition, it needs to recognise other vehicles of any type and avoid them, stop at pedestrian walks, stop at traffic lights etc. So by naming it autopilot and giving the perception that it is almost a fully autonomous system misleads consumers. I wish them all the best though don’t get me wrong, just providing some constructive criticism.

These two things are not the same but ok. The branding "autopilot" is misleading. You can`t honestly dispute that.

@@Nazarje12 Autopilot in planes isn't fully self flying. Why should I expect a car to be any different?

@@directorjustin I am not arguing that. I am arguing that branding something as autopilot is misleading for the layman who will buy the vehicle and then promptly fall asleep at the wheel as he thinks it is autonomous. If you would label it as driver assistance (which it is right now) I think less people would not rely so fully on the "autopilot".

legend and? The fire department or police could have broken the windows or used the jaws of life, mangled and non-opening doors are pretty common in bad car accidents.

"Cruise Control" as sold by a company that has been promising that it will drive itself for years.

really?

Better compare the number of human crashes in a year vs the number of automated crashes in X amount of time xD

@@DocRealTalk factor in the number of actually autonomous vehicles around and... dammit, you might end up dividing by zero.

@@frien_d Some clearly don't prefer not dying more than they prefer abusing these systems to text or nap. *"factor in the number of actually autonomous vehicles around and... dammit, you might end up dividing by zero. "* There are several levels of autonomy.

@goran stojanovic Take your pills.

First part of your argument was already stated in this video. The second portion (short/long term) is missing the point several points in this video. Tesla advertises it's vehicles as being autonomous. They are not (yet). It's not about what will happen in the future, it's about what's happened so far, and what's happening right now.

this.

@@Mythyc It advertises they have FSD hardware. Software is different. They are allowed to advertise their cars support FSD and they have FSD hardware and they are autonomous but the software is just not working perfectly and it's in beta stage.

The fact that you said that Tesla is the closest to FSD shows you may be a little bias towards Tesla. Tesla isn't that close and no one knows if this method of FSD will become the industry standard.. Not to mention other companies such as waymo, with actual self driving technology currently on the roads in arizona. Therefore, for FSD data, Waymo actually may be comparable to Tesla. It seems there may be a bit of a hypebeast dynamic to your investing style. I still think Tesla is a great long term investment. But lets not spew false facts on the internet and then hide behind a cliche investment line.

@@Anonymous-jg3ui All existing methods for implementing full self driving use machine learning, and whatever the method is, the one who has access to most data wins the race. Right now tesla has 3 billion miles of real world data, whereas waymo has a measly 20 million. So go figure

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

True but dont announce and hype it like you've solved the problem. Elon is pulling an Elizabeth Holmes when it comes to FSD

@@ededdneddy988 I strongly believe the way that Tesla is trying to solve FSD will come through first to market, although delayed from their own goals. It remains to be seen whether or not Elon Musk ends up like Elizabeth Holmes but based on Mr. Musk's track record on successful (and many times late) endeavours I find it hard to believe FSD won't be a success. But luckily there's always a possibility to short the stock to put one's money where their mouth is.

@@eaaeeeea tbh I don't think Elon himself is sure about FSD. Right now he's saving grace is autopilot. There have been many instances where Elon announces something assuringly without actually knowing if it'll work. Its one trait I find annoying about him. Imagine if Jeff Bezos went on twitter and announced that Amazon will start using robots to deliver packages, or they are building a machine that'll teleport packages to their rightful owners. Its not an honest way to do business. Better to announce a product or service when it is ready

@@ededdneddy988 Yeah I feel that frustration sometimes too. To me it seems Elon is just so excited about the stuff he does, he wants everyone to know that a thing is coming at this date without including any time for possible unknown variables. I haven't got the feeling he's being fraudulent although his communication may appear so.

@@eaaeeeea the communication is definitely fraudulent. Forget the self-driving, what about all those people that have fully paid up for the new Roadster? What about the Cybertruck that clearly is very far from done as surely will need redesigns to be road safe. Tesla's second activity is crowdfunding basically.

Arti999 easy to count the number killed. It’s an adaptive cruise control system that he deceived people to think it’s anything more robust than that.

Mike Miller it’s Theranos-lite. “200 blood tests from one drop of blood” = “fully self driving robotaxis”. It’s science fiction, marketed and sold to gullible investors with too much cash.

Mike Miller can't afford one eh?

Tesla actually does have data, over a billion miles of it, comparing accident occurrence rates with and without Autopilot turned on. Tesla vehicles driven with Autopilot turned on have significantly lower accident rates than Teslas with Autopilot turned off.

james_ dean you mean can we afford an overpriced vehicle that will never be mass market? Nope.

hyperloop?

agustinbs Not for the Model Y tho

The same thing could be said about Scientology They haven’t be proven wrong that the world is ending soon

Everything is a process ... he is at the forefront putting in the work to reach there... he sees the hope ...

@@julius5256 no man, the things elon now delivers where promisess before.

Bro, if we can teach a 15 year old kid with an immature brain to drive in a year and do quite well , no reason why a computer with AI can't do it in less time. Its all marketing speak and Elon knows it.

thats how AI work lol, The media is stupid . The virus has slowed down the development

No excuse for having absurd predictions like having a robofleet by 2020

@@jimmybaker4821 what have you done till 2020?

And his engineer is crazy like him hahhaa

@@jimmybaker4821 GM said that they would have a fully autonomous Chevy Bolt without a steering wheel or pedals before the end of 2019. Are you morally outraged? No? Didn't think so.

@@keshavchoubey5260 how is that relevant to my point? Learn to argue u utter brainlet

I sure don’t mind. Safety first 🙏

Oh I'm sure some people mind, otherwise there wouldn't be so many haters and naysaysers. But thankfully, I didn't end up like them.

I sometimes was so tired some times that I would litterly fall asleep and wake up seconds after. Having to drive to the side and take a nap. Even after the 20 min nap I should have had Tesla's half auto pilot because I was so tired still that I was barely awake. The auto pilot for sure saves so many lifes every day.

Totally agree. The invidents that have happened with Tesla FSD or autopilot are sad and tragic, but they happen even more often in cars that lack these safety features. The US has to wake up and stop protecting consumers at all costs. If you are supposed to be driving then drive! Dont blame your car for not being able to drive, we all know they can drive 90% of the time it is your responsibility to intervene in the rest or the cases

@Retro Beast- Driving is not a ‘right’. Transport ration is a necessity and what ever form that takes will evolve. One day we will laugh that we allowed or even trusted people to drive themselves, let alone 16 year old behind the wheel

@Retro Beast - I’m not going to get into an argument. Basically, insurance companies will make it so expensive that they won’t insure you for safety reasons. This will take time, but it the same reason you can’t take a horse downtown. Horses filled Manhattan in 1900 with zero cars. In 1913 there weren’t any horses. Exponential growth and safety of the community will prevent you from driving a human enabled car downtown. Basically FSD will be so good in the future that cars will be like trying to get magnets on the same polar side to touch. It will be impossible. Too many people die every year driving. Just like they had to outlaw drinking and driving when horses weren’t allowed in Manhattan. Safety will rule over how you ‘feel’ about driving. Driving is not a ‘right’. No where in the constitution does it say you have the right to drive. You would have to make an amendment to the constitution to make that a right. Not gonna happen.

@Retro Beast also, I love driving. I will miss it. More than likely my kids will never drive a car. Car manufacturers, like seatbelts, will be forced to remove steering wheels from cars when FSD is proven to be a 1 in a million chance of getting in an accident. You can’t ride a horse in downtown Manhattan because it’s your right to do so. It’s not.

Abhay Mahato cnbs

Do you watch CNBC? This is a joke right

someone : who will support elon musk and his companies... ? . . Abhay Mahato: me! me! me first...No. 1 TSLA fanboi...

@@bbbf09 i hope you learn programming someday...

@@abhaymahato7770 Not sure I follow? I have MSc in Computer enginering if that helps. Just a bit of fun - tongue in cheek reply. I am Tesla fan - but fanboys have no sense of humour. If you are one I won't be forgiven. If you are not then maybe see funny side. I firmly believe the road to FSD is years away (more than decade) . The criticism - or the scrutiny - on an oft promised undeliverable is justifiable IMHO.

If FSD proves to have a lower rate of accidents and deaths than human driven vehicles, than it actually saves lives, even if it is not perfect and people are still being killed.

He is saying it since 2011 and it has improved with 500% from around 100 miles untouched at best to 500 miles untouched at best. It has to be around 50,000 miles untouched and not only on the highway. It’s going to take around 20 more years I would say. It’s an assisted driver system, hyped up since 2011 to be full driver in “a couple of years”

At least half of Americans dont understand thinking of other people's lives. Look at the arguments against wearing masks. Look at how many people drive drunk.

Averroes Dude in my opinion 10 years and it’s gonna beat a professional driver in miles/accidents

@@Daniela-pr7rz I agree. See my comments above,

no he doesn't.

Anyone could claim that they are going to deliver in the future about anything. Senseless statement.

@legend What has that todo with delivery? This has something todo with workplace safety

​@Ziggi Mon Yes, when and what has he not delivered?

@Ziggi Mon Coming soon: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/soqTeJ1pa5qXr2Q.html

Tesla sells their concept of "self-driving car." It is make sense for them to take part of responsibility of whatever happened to their product. That's like buying an expired milk. Whose fault is it? You buying an expired milk or the company selling an expired milk? Pick your poison.

I respect Elon for this he could of been like others

This is still at an early stage of it, it took 40 years for things like seatbelt to be implemented properly. It’s Elon’s mission to fully take on this responsibility, and we must give him time.

Every time I see a headline that says some new car is a Tesla killer.... they are comparing it to a 2012 Model S. Tesla is 6-8 years ahead of everyone else. not that you'd know it with articles like this one. Yellow journalism.

Search up waymo they are also very close

@Kevin Montrond I'm not really 'for' driverless vehicles, however, you must not have ever driven in Ohio 🤣 A blind, 3-legged dog could drive better than most of Ohio's population.

@Kevin Montrond erm, yes and no, it's like saying humans are smarter than computer, we aren't, we just excel at different things. Driving is also the same thing, while humans are good at recognising moving objects, we are millions times slower to react. And what good does it do if you can recognise the car killing you if you can't avoid it?

@Kevin Montrond Self driving cars now are WAY safer than human drivers. And it will only get safer

Lol

To touch on this further... Look at transportation before we had cars; horses, oxen, camels or just plain walking. I'm sure people had the same mindset when gas powered vehicles were first introduced. They saw how reckless humans can be when in control of said vehicles - causing accidents, injuries, deaths, etc. Implementing basic traffic rules and laws, such as speed limits and right-of-way, helped to reduce accidents. Eventually the horse became obsolete and is now more of a luxury to own. Gas powered vehicles will become the future horse. Electric and autonomous vehicles will take over and owning/driving a gas powered vehicle will be more of a luxury/leisurely activity. We are witnessing a paradigm shift towards a new way of transportation. Of course there are going to be people who are against the shift and justify it based on the human brain vs. computers. If it weren't for the human brain, we wouldn't have this beautiful technology. Are there going to be accidents, flaws, quirks and bugs during the shift? Of course. Are we fast to put the blame on technology? Of course. We're too arrogant as humans and we'll always think we're better than (insert thing here). I'm personally not a huge fan of EV or autonomous driving but I'm open-minded enough to see the future. I'll always enjoy rowing my own gears in a manual gearbox machine 😁.

It must drive in the snow and have AWD! A small bug like inexpensive vehicle for seniors to get you to the store and back and fully autonomous!

Some definitely do, but I think Ford and Honda, and maybe VW are taking a cue from Elon that now is the time for change. I mean, the EV F 150 is due by the end of the year, early next year.

Yes they do, that doesn't mean you cant criticize false advertising, false promises and bad security standards

On the other hand, if I run a bar and have aggressive marketing “10 tequila shots for 1 dollar!” some of the blame is on me when people get drunk.

People see the marketing, the name autopilot, musk retweeting people doing it and think it’s ok. Tesla pointing to fine print is just scummy - their cars are good enough to sell without deceiving people!

Beers companied don't tell people that drunk driving is better.

pearcake Nobody thinks it's okay to fall asleep behind the wheel, maybe you do, but there's no need to insult the intelligence of the entire human race by comparing it to yours. Tesla requires that your hands grip the wheel the entire time on autopilot, and it beeps at you when it sees that you're falling sleep, so you can't do it anymore anyways.

just like cyberpunk😂😂

Butt hey don't point out that the Tesla with autopilot is 5 times safer than cars without it. Imagine how long the video would have been with all the fatal car crashes of cars without autopilot!

Wrong. The actual answer is auto makers wont allow it to become legal on the road because they dont possess similar technology meaning they would have to license it from tesla. We can pretend its about safety but human drivers are very terrible, tesla autopilot has been safer than a human driver for nearly a decade.

Well said. You think CNBS would know this.

@@TheBUGZNTA "they dont possess similar technology" LOL tesla is at best level 2. Many other are level 4 for years now.

@@bokoloaranyfa3824 with $25,000 lidar machines that cannot reach market at current cost. Versus the cost of a camera and a basic computer for tesla SD.

please stop

Stop lying. The computer isn't that advance and often goes over stop sign and mess up a lot

Christopher Franco uhh, I’m not lying lmao, I drive it everyday, I should know how well it works. The Stop Light & Sign detection was just released this past month, Sorry, where’s your Tesla??

@@MrDance4meh You should stop putting people's lives at risk.

TryHardGamers it’s literally the safest car in the world.

Be hahaha ❤️

They are realistic.

Hahaha awesome!

Clayton Carter I know right lol they make you apply pressure every couple of seconds to the wheel to confirm you’re still there and they just sitting there staring at a truck as they run into it

​@@the_seeker.entity9206 But why call it FSD therefore misleading users?

The Last Hacker I think it might actually not be called that yet but it’s also the plan to make it self driving since that is what they are actively working on and too be honest it basically already is there are less accidents per mile with the software on already then the national average per mile

@@StevenAkinyemi Full Self Driving and Autopilot are two totally different products sold separately with different prices. The current Full Self Driving product does not have all the features yet, either, and everyone who buys it knows that. The main thing it's lacking is automatic driving on city streets. The current FSD can so almost all highway driving fully automatically, on ramp to off ramp. The crashes shown were all people misusing an old version of Autopilot, and the accident rate with Autopilot is approximately 10x less than cars without Autopilot. Interesting how CNBC left out that major fact.

@@LoanwordEggcorn people are mostly (well, sometimes) idiots, and any system on which life and death of people depends should be designed with that in mind. You can't blame people for swallowing the hype. It's up to Tesla to be deliberate and measured about communication about FSD's features. That 10x safer number is suspect too, comparing accident rates for all miles driven by normal cars v/s miles driven on autopilot while people primarily use Autopilot on highways, where the rate of accidents per distance driven is lower for everyone. It's not a like for like comparison. Plus it lumps all other cars together, including much older cars with far fewer safety features. If you compare cars of a similar age to Teslas, which are more likely to have safety features like collision detection, blind spot monitoring, and so on, I don't think the difference would be as stark as you make it out to be.

Because only very few of those on the road, verses millions

@@jantschierschky3461 There are more than one million teslas on the road.

@@johntheux9238 one million teslas does not equate to "one million regular 'autopilot' users."

@@johntheux9238 but most don't have the auto pilot feature. In percentage the accident rates are high. Btw lot more than 7 in total

@@jantschierschky3461 Wrong: www.tesla.com/VehicleSafetyReport

Yes, 😁

The FSD beta? It's here. just gotta wait for the stable version and actually have a Tesla 😭

true

StrangerBoy That reuseable drone ship stuff looks fake tbh.

Just Saying Ah yes, I have autism as well.

Well, electric vehicles still are impractical when it comes to the increased cost per mile and poor range. An electric bicycle runs about a dollar a mile.

@meaturama you sure?

I disagree....they are just reporting what they have observed

Bribery mainly

@@adelekeakinlabi4408 they see what fits their narrative, just like most media. Tesla FSD is much closer than they make it out to be in their claims.

Because their revenue come from big boys add. And Tesla do not pay a single penny to them.

CNBullShit

The +5mph offset is in the 2020.28.x release for city streets.

Tim S, That is my experience as well. In the time Since stop sign and stoplight recognition was released a few short months ago, the system has improved substantially.

EXACTLY

Not to mention all these Sheople in the comments eating it like candy..

*scowls in oil lobbyist*

Its a valid question

Why Google tho

No, they will still be having Chanos on daily saying it a fraud and going to Zero when Musk is cutting the ribbon on GigaFactory 37 in Iceland. Just realized they are building 3 factories at this moment and expanding 2 others.

Stan SPb Correction building two. Giga Berlin and the Terafactory in Austin.

@@Cars-N-Jets Tera lol - wake me up when Zetta is opened. Musk should cut the crap and start delivering on previous promises.

She old, she dont need no TSLA

The word “SOON” means 100 years?

I really believe that he will, but not soon

@@at0201 No, Not in 100 years, He is single handedly changing the whole automobile industry, Give him some time to accomplish his targets. It is easy to criticise than to suppot him.. He will achieve his goals.

@@treat4Yu so, define for us "soon" then, genius?? I'd love to know after overpaying for EAP and FSD. Is soon 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, 10 years??

@@fyoukungflu5881 please think about the situation of electric cars before tesla motors were introduced in 2003. Before tesla cars were begin to made, other electric cars were really pathetic. No one really think about buying an electric car at that time. Tesla rise step by step by achieving each of their goals, Better ranges, Better Battery, Better technology etc.. Everything comes with a price and Nothing evolve in a second. If he can do complex rocket launches, then he can really achive full self driving, be patient the days are near.

I think this is a bit of a reach only because we don't have nearly as many "self driving" cars out there compared to gas cars. But I do think in the long run, Teslas will be far safer.

Andrew I think as the number autopilot and self-driving cars increase they’ll get safer as they will eventually communicate with each other. As it is, it rarely does a questionable maneuver but even on “mad max mode”, it drives far more cautiously than most people. Autopilot has been a total quality of life improvement on my commute but full self driving through streets is low on my priorities list.

​@@louderthangod This. They don't need to communicate, but, AI doesn't drive as agressively and care-free as humans do, it drives as safe as possible. I think Elon once said something about how creating autonamous cars is easy, making it drive with other humans is hard. :)

plus the drivers were sleeping/ not paying attention

Eventually

@@_rileyweaver_637 Yes, most likely eventually. At least a decade away or much much longer.

Claude Desaulniers I always wonder where people get these figures for how far out it will be. At least a decade? Did that come from anywhere that isn’t your ass?

Righ! Like I would like to know the ratio of self driving accidents to human accidents

The point was the DMS is inadequate and poorly designed. Yes, certainly crashes happen, but you can't simply wash away these incidents by quoting statistics that we don't really know anything about. These are vehicles that regular people buy while believing the marketing material. Caveat emptor doesn't indemnify Tesla in that regard nor with how people will inevitably operate advanced driver assistance software.

They still sleeping buddy

Real talk though, if Ford is telling the truth the mustang mach-e looks to be 90% there compared to a model y. (and in certain aspects looks to be way better) That doesn't sound like a "10 year advantage".

Manuel Alvarez the Mach-e doesn’t have anything close to this. Ford has been working with 3rd parties to develop self driving but it hasn’t ever been put on any of their released vehicles. All of the assisted driver technologies premiered for the mach e were done with major computer simulations. I’m here for the Mach E but tech at Tesla is leaps and bounds better. The closest thing to Tesla right now is Polestar 2 and those aren’t shipping worldwide yet. They mastered the car but not the tech, they are using a standard embedded android device for their car; no shade but it’s not what a electric car is at all.

@@lisatom42 Tesla also worked with third parties.

They all have self driving cars. They however under no circumstances unleash it on the public or make their plans public because of the very issue that people take it as it can do things it can not do. It can't even work in heavy rain and snow. So full self driving is years and years away.

It's not hard, elon already solved full self driving in 2017 and it will definitely be ready next year

@@runescapefan0001 I hope you’re right. Honestly, I’ve been a little disappointed with FSD thus far. It struggles getting around my town. For every amazing thing it does, it flops on something else. For my daily commute, I have to take over many times. My experience seems to differ from what I see on UKposts. I’m sure it‘ll improve. I remember AP when it wasn’t all that great and watched it improve to something mind blowing.

Yeah, but compared to other companies, Tesla's full self driving capabilities still lag behind. Look at Waymo and Cruise, they already have driverless vehicles on the street.

Just because Elon Musk is the loudest doesn't mean they're the furthest ahead. They are behind WAYMO and Cruise

Steven Lang Ahead is very deceptive if your system is so much more expensive. The question isn’t if it’s just when Tesla makes it work and then Lidar is outdated. We as humans drive with vision...

lemminjuice are you kidding me? Those cars are on pre-determined routes and still are only using lidar. Every car Tesla drives is training the massive neural net to determine every route on the planet with every possible scenario. I’m sorry but you are very mistaken, Tesla pours billions into the research of this tech every year and other companies would be lucky if they could put up half the funding combined. Your “ubers” will be driverless Tesla’s in 10 years time, not Waymo potato vans

Steven Lang That is a laughable statement. Tesla is literally an order of magnitude or more ahead of them in literally every single facet of autonomous technology. Waymo’s basically drive down tracks, the only thing stopping Tesla will be regulations

That's what I thought

people who purposefully abuse the system and wreck.

I press this video because there is Elon musk

troLOLZ

ofcourse you would because you invested your savings in tesla

@Izic Allende true. They're trying to lower tesla stock cause they were hating so much years before he became successful and they're just mad they didn't get in on the company when they could.

Autopilot suggests to average people that it is autonomous. They don’t know how automatic the autopilot on planes is either.

I completely agree. Autopilot doesn’t mean self flying. 🤦‍♂️ all these accidents happened because people abused the system

@@MaxMakerChannel anyone who can afford a tesla knows what auto pilot is

I guess you missed the promises where Musk talked about robotaxis with no steering wheels. It's a nice game of semantics you're playing but you can go over Musk's statements to see what he promised. Seriously... joke of a comment. We all know what CNBC is talking about here and most people know what Tesla has promised and what their goal is.

Waymo is ahead of everyone including tesla. Tesla don't even have lidar on their vehicles.

@@donut_kingdom lidar is a stupid waste of time as have been repeatedly explained by musk on multiple detailed presentation. they are using image recognition software and they are decades ahead of everyone. lidar is useless for image recognition.

@@donut_kingdom haha

Yang Zhang remember elon is an engineer. elon launching multiple starlink satellites is going to make lidar be a thing of the past. Lidar is not gonna be necessary once he has those multiple satellites up and running. LiDAR is going to be old technology

waymo is on a hd map system, that means if the map changes its screwed. If a Waymo leaves its Geo fence is a paper-weight. A tesla can see and learn the road on any road.

Becaue all of them want their features to be safe and reliable by the time they release it.

Could it be because it simply doesnt work?

@@roadrunner6224 true but you have to start somewhere. Must learn how to crawl before you can walk.

so they can damage their cars, get them repaired or new one hence more revenue

Do GM, Ford, Toyota and all the other vehicle manufacturers even have electric cars on the road.

Yh that's very true governments like the EU are so restrictive on this they don't allow full turning stirring wheels