Well, actually there is, Water/H2O, but then hiw would they make money seeing as water is as free in the air as we breath out, go figure!🤪

LFTR

Energy cannot be created or destroyed - it is like gold or platinum, it is immutable. It just changes form. All energy exists already - just the form varies - so the whole "Green Energy" argument is a joke from the off.

Yes mate when you take into consideration that wind and solar power generators are (as in my own comment) known to degrade over time around ten years being the average for wind turbines and something similar for solar panels and then they require replacement and just how on earth can that be cost effective or sustainable? Again this would cause more pollution to manufacture these idiotic, ugly, and weather (and sunlight) dependant devices.

That is the undeniable truth! Matter cannot be created nor destroyed! It always exists in some form or another! That's why you cannot have 💯 % clean energy! We can however develop ways to reduce the harmful emissions and only use what is best for all life on Earth!?

no, it's a societal/cultural crisis. we did this, all of us together, not the politicians. if a society cant feed, clothe and house itself, it will fail.

They tell farmers to stop breeding cows because they fart and pollute our atmosphere, so maybe we should get rid of politicians because they are a lot of useless farts causing a bigger problem than the useful cows!!

​@@notimpressed7559politicians in bed with KlausSchwab

Exactly!

As long as we exclude the French (EDF) and Chinese from delivering said power stations. Hinkley Point C is running massively over budget and time scales. UK Gov was warned at the time that EDF had failed to deliver this new reactor design on time & to budget.

We need to go down the SMNR route not the Hinckley route. 20 to 30 of these around the UK would power just about every home in the country. The government MAY back nuclear some time in the next 20 years. We could be actual world leaders in nuclear NOW.

Small modular reactors are coming, and they will destroy the wind industry.

Wind never made any sense but are a great visual and thrown up quickly unlike nuclear which take many years. It was a ludicrous decision by Ed Davey to buy French/Chinese technology for Hinkley Point C. Already discredited, only one reactor is actually functioning in China with both the French and Finish plants massively over budget and years behind. Failure built on failure. Maybe that was the intention to push us to intermittent wind and solar. Mindless.

Yes. Those on the left are all for protecting the environment, yet also want millions of foreign people to join us, people who’ll have no interest in nature conservation whatsoever, not to mention the requirements for housing, infrastructure, food, yet more wind turbines etc. To say they’re foolish is a huge understatement.

Woke wind? Nonsense.

What you've said is so far right you are not wrong

Think by turning everything upside down left would be right or something? The only fact, i could agree with, It takes literally no one to run those farms mechanically. The Electricity part has still to be handled like every other Electrical plant. Once we know the real shelf life of Generators, we can ajust.

But Tice loves solar panels and pushed the vax. Put Nigel back in and you've got my vote or of course Andrew Bridgen

Arse power

We can’t store the excess.

😂😂😂😂

Brilliant answer

​@@rogerbeattie2263 The GOVERNMENT talk a load of 💩💩💩, IT'S all about taking money off the PUBLIC, and CONTROL.

net zero is unabtainable, Check out Lord Muncktons lecture 2022 oxford university. or Sir Patrick Moore Canadian marine bioligest and green peace co founder. Another good resourse is planet of the humans By micheal Moore. You are correct this insanity needs to stop. I give you 2 thumbs up.

Absolutely

The whole climate change debate is a total wrought.

Agreed. But that has very little to do with wind. Net Zero is there to create headroom for nuclear power plants that provision nuclear weapons race with expertise and raw materials..

Net-zero is a rational ideal, and can be achieved by following facts. A fact is that unpredictable sources of electricity can't supply big-scale, reliably electricity.

I had a WHAT moment on your opening text, Phew closing text said it all.

Perfect sarcasm.

So the heat used in cement production happens without co2?? And why do you believe co2 is a poison?? Co2 is a base for life just like oxygen is you, and all animals breath in oxygen and breath out co2. Most plants during the day breath in co2 and breath out oxygen and without sunlight the resperation of plants is reversed at night though greatly reduced. Anyone who believes that co2 is a dangerous gas has been deluded by fake science and scientists willing to lie

You are 100% correct. I'm mildly offended that you stole my discovery of fairy dust as the real source of power however.

😂😂😂😂👏👏👏👏 You had me there.

Agreed!

The Russians in Siberia do not mind global warming. But even they must be concerned to see methane bubbling from the permafrost.

Thankyou !

We are the carbon they want to erase

No idea of world climate

Many have ceased voting at all - it's treason to vote for corporations. That's what governments are - check their ABN numbers.

David v Goliath battle going on in Skye, where the existing turbines already produce enough for our needs.

You obviously have no clue how much oil wind generators are saving, one single turbine saves about 20 to 30 tons PER DAY in average, please don't be ridiculous, someone who tells that wind generators are so environmental damaging that has not the slightest clue about the magintude of ressource savings should not talk about this subject.

How about the fact that wind turbine cost so much and only last so long , the cost about 5 million dollars to take away! How about the garbage from this short term use! What about that in your net zero? Does it make enough electricity to even cover the cost and waste when done?

​@@hanswallner2188bollox. If the wind blew constantly possibly. But it doesn't and there has to be other generating methods. Please look up the interweb and educate yourself on how much diesel generators have been used in Scotland to keep the blades turning. Educate yourself.

I live near two wind farms. One has 10 turbines another has 6. The wind speed according to the Met Office is 25 mph gusting 40. None of the turbines are turning. Too windy.

Between 6% and 8% of electricity produced is lost in transmission, I'm amazed people who rant about wind never understand that.

Indeed. There are 2 mass psychoses (Climate Delusion and Energy Transition Delusion) in operation in association with a massive fraud (Climate Fraud). The carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are largely beneficial. Benefits include increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs, fewer deaths from hypothermia and postponement of the next glacial maximum.

And whats the problem with that? Wind energy saves millions of tons of diesel, if you use a little when there is not enough wind is a problem for you? Please see your doctor.

That doesn'[t seem to have happened.

​​@@hanswallner2188walloper alert. Wind is too costly. The turbine blades can't be recycled. They don't produce on demand. Please after seeing your psychiatrist watch the rest of the video, then go and visit Germany where a big wind producing energy company has just dismantled it's wind turbines to dig up the land beneath to mine for coal.

And nuclear doesn't have any skeletons in its cupboard...?

What - and the other sources are not? Please....

@@zmrxy6632no. It works on its own. Anything else I can help you with? I think harder next time.

Then your as thick as he is but at least he is getting paid to talk nonsense

Rubbish.

We, the public? Your tiny mind? Mathematics is troublesome, agreed, but persevere.

We are funding these wind turbines massively, yet we still have to pay massively for our electricity, we paid for the things to be built, we should be getting super cheap electricity. It's all just a racket, using other people's money (i.e. ours), the elite just manipulate the goalposts, so that they can make a fortune, while getting us to put up the money to build it. It cant go on.

You're too late to the party, me ol' tatey. The studies are in already. Renwables can do Net Zero (if we must!) by 2040). You probably need to read more.

2 thumbs up to you. because your right.

Bless your cotton socks. Whoever told you that? Your barber? The Hoover Dam is coming up to 100 years old. Oldest solar panels now many decades old and still producing. LOL.

@@grahambennett8151 I generally find barbers and cab drivers fairly wise... I'm guessing some radio or tv program sponsored by coal and power.

@@annpeerkat2020 I don't disagree about the drives and barbers. The last time I spoke with either, their specialist subject was football. Maybe Nigel should be driving a cab. He knows buffer all about energy. LOL.

It’s a beautiful synergy, Gods’ creation.

Too much carbon is bad as well. Most natural systems do better at some optimal point. E.g. water .. zero or too much equals death

Not a wind issue. Nuclear says it wants zero emissions too. Only difference? Nuclear isn't zero emissions.

500 ppm carbon dioxide, all the calcium carbonate in the seas dissolves.

@@grahambennett8151 No gaseous emissions, One kg of fission products per ten GWh of energy, and the radioactivity of fission products disappears fastest for the mostest.

'Too cheap to meter'! Oh those heady days of nuclear promise.

I have solar and batteries installed this year. So yeah it basically is.

It'll never be free. Governments will always tax whatever they can get away with. Windows and salt used to be taxed remember. The fundamentals of life energy and water are easy prey.

actually the taxpayer has already and is paying for the power production before you then are hit with a demand for some thing you have already paid for , this is a fact not fiction like any green estimations from modeling

That was Nikolai Tesla’s dream. He died mysteriously and a lot of his papers disappeared. 😉

Hinkley C is going to be funded by the Chinese govt and owned by the French govt. They've already started cutting corners, they don't give a toss if it goes tits up and the insurance cost will be covered by..? The British taxpayer!

The government will never run out of money to subsidise green energy …….. it’s YOUR money they’re spending!

Recycling is pretty expensive but possible, on the other side the blades do not do any harm if you dig them, so i do not see a problem in not recycling them. Consider that one single wind turbine will prevent 20 to 30 tons of oil per day being burnt, so we are talking about incredible ressource savings here, one factor that lots of clueless people have no idea about.

@@hanswallner2188 Yet if the dumping rate continues, there will be thousands of acres of dumped blades. Over the next 100 years this will be a major problem.

Good business for generator salesmen.

Net Zero is economically destructive delusional insanity. Wind farms are a colossal waste of taxpayers money and resources (including coal and oil).

Here’s a mad fact……..the carbon footprint of Australia has been compared th how much the total number of trees consume,calculating the number of trees they have.they pretty much cancel one another out and that’s without other vegetation and mangrove use 50% more of CO2 than a tree.this has been created to tax people

Australia is by far not the poster country for net-zero. It's one of the most wasteful countries on Earth. In Australia, about 800 people die yearly due to air pollution by coal-burning power stations. Nuclear, which has a mortality rate per unit of electricity produced 933 time lower than Australia's mix of brown and black coal, would kill about two people every three years as opposed to coal's 2,400--that's in Australia alone. Yet nuclear power generation is illegal in Australia while coal is not. If that's not a sign of stupidity, what is?

@@grasonicus Australia provides materials to much of the rest of the world. It is our coal, gas, oil, uranium, and mineral mining activities that power many countries. But we get the blame for the emissions for these create. "Green Accounting" is wrong and corrupt in so many areas. Australia are going ahead in leaps and bounds, trying to reduce pollution and increase sustainable energy. Many of us are repairing what can be repaired, and most of us are recycling what can be recycled. Solar energy and/or solar hot water are now on something like 40pct of houses and this is increasing rapidly. Queensland is leading the way ! Massive wind farms and solar farms are being built and commissioned at a rapid rate. Electric cars sales are taking off. People are installing batteries to flatten demand and reduce grid spikes, people are planting trees like crazy. I've got solar power, solar hot water, and I've planted trees over 100 acres of virtual desert (an old pineapple farm) - and I've done this all out of my own pocket and with no help. Nothing is ever 100% green, but we are doing everything we can with the technologies available. (I wish we would take Nuclear Power was an option our government and people would consider).

​@grasonicus Sorry but you don't know what you're talking about.

And the biggest culprit is the present UN Secretary General 🤔

So what? think they can eat their credit cards? Once it has become a real crisis and Bananas come in dozens, not Containers, They too will revert to violence to get one. Or pay with all they have. Because SOMEONE NEEDS TO KEEP CAPITALISM ALIVE WITH PROFITS. Bragging rights never EVER got anything good done. Gave a feeling of Advantage or Privilege. But if you are sitting on the throne, and the Toilet paper is out, it all doesn't matter anymore.

You are sadly, entirely correct.

Agreed. Most of school was useless and history is a lie. I've learnt more in 10 years than in the previous 50 & all l want is the truth

Somebody should have warned us about the evils of the government-media complex.

brought to you by...........THE KHAZARIAN MAFIA. I cant use their normal name, because its been "censored". You know who rules the world, by who you cannot criticize.

yes, yes, you're right Carol. Go girl. I also only discovered last month that viruses don't exist, seriously there's no proof that they ever exosted. See Garman court case between Drs. Stefan Lanka and David Bardens. Stunning revelation, but liberating too.

And nuclear doesn't!? 🤦‍♂

Yeah, terrible problem, i see.... one wind turbine is preventing 20 to 30 tons of oil being burnt per day, please don't be ridicolous. Do you have any idea what terrible environmental impact in mining, transporting and processsing 20 to 30 tons of oil every day would cause?

@@hanswallner2188 Your argument doesn't make sense. The alternative for wind turbines ISN'T 'burning oil'. It's Nuclear power!

@@zmrxy6632 "And nuclear doesn't!? " Nuclear power plants are not build in the seas and they indeed do not leak oil into the water. So yeah the "🤦‍♂" applies really well to your comment!

Not to mention oil leaks from tankers and off shore oil platforms.

Wind has a low energy density and wind power is centuries out of date. Wind farms only exist due to massive taxpayer funded subsidies. They make no economic sense. They are a colossal waste of taxpayers money and resources (including coal and oil) in addition to being a blight on the landscape.

they only last or so years

There's vast areas of abandoned solar panels here as well.....

@@kenneth9874 Says you. But where?

Even if you were right, which power stations precisely can be repurposed? Not radioactive nuclear power plants, for starters. Anything else, maybe?

And you've factored in the cost of a) producing nuclear fuel and b) processing the nuclear waste have you? Add these costs to the equation and you realise it categorically ISN'T cheap.

@@zmrxy6632 Acre after acre of solar and wind isn't cheap either. Gas and coal seem even less viable. Geothermal would be nice - but does seem to require the right geology. Difference is that nuclear produces a massive and steady, reliable supply of power. France uses Nuclear for 70% (UK 15%) of its electricity and theirs costs the consumer less than half the UK price. France please!

Nuclear is expensive, too.

@@philipdamask2279 And yet France uses 70% Nuclear generation and gives the French electricity at less than half the UK consumer prices?

@@zmrxy6632 Per kWh or GWhr, there is no power or energy source that has less waste than nuclear.

Sweden is leading the way!

you are correct. The next year or two will define us. I believe We won't turn the climate lie around in time. We in the weast are SO SCREWED. 2 thumbs up for you.

If energy density is a problem, all we have to do is erect windmills on your nuclear exclusion zones. LOL. Energy density is moot when nuclear waste is spread the whole world over - and it is. Every corner of the earth is contaminated with nuclear waste now. You can have solar panels, windmills on land that grows crops. No waste from renewables.

@@markseehawer3762🎯

Now that was a critical thinkers comment 🧐👌 If only you were the Head of a Government Department🤕...😢

Unless you're a politician in which case you claim it on expenses, as they did last year when prices were raised.

Use less

​@@UtubeRwokeLefties ABSOLUTELY BLOODY DISGUSTING.

A bargain compared to the bill for Hinkley C!

how many tonnes of iron ore to make your car?

@@winstonwilliams4859 a lot less than a aircraft carrier...

@@winstonwilliams4859 The real greatest threat to the environment and the planet are the "renewable" energy infrastructures demanded by the climate alarmist lunatics. Let us assume they don’t want to destroy everyone’s but their own lifestyle. To accommodate personal transportation (electric cars etc.) you will need to double or treble current electrical generation. So let’s take the United States. Currently the USA has 58,000 wind turbines. In order to replace all the USA fossil fuel electric power generation and all personal and public transportation with wind generated power would take 14 million 1.8 MW wind turbines. What will this take to build??? Each turbine requires approximately 1,000 tons of steel, copper, rare earth elements and concrete offshore more. In addition a wind turbine is composed of several composite parts; but the blades are made of fibre-reinforced epoxy or unsaturated polyester and represent the largest use of material. Other turbine parts made of polyester include the nacelle (housing for the gearbox, generator, and other components) and the hub. Oops all these are hydrocarbons... So to build these wind turbines will need approximately 14 billion tons of materials. To produce this, new sources of raw materials will need to be found. How many new mines would be needed, the energy for mining, metal smelting and processing. Energy of excavating hundreds of billions of tons of rock and tens of billions of tons of over burden all of which would have to be handled and properly disposed of. This vast quantity of new materials will require vast amounts of new power to create, all of which will have to come from fossil fuels. Energy and materials will be required build the new factories necessary to manufacture all the parts for these turbines (not included above). Once assembled this vast array of new turbines would need to be transported and erected covering an area 10 times the size of Texas throughout the North American continent. Tens of thousands of miles of new access roads would also be needed along with a much expanded electrical grid with tens of thousands of miles of new electrical cables. Again energy and materials are not included above. Now multiply this for Australia, Europe. Africa, Asia and South America. Just to service the UK requires a doubling of current copper mining and smelting. How much fossil fuel energy and resources are required for the green revolution? Before you deploy enough you will need to start replacing this junk since, the realistic life 10 to 15 years (depending on quality of construction and the environment such as offshore near corrosive seawater). And about storage??

@@winstonwilliams4859 les then one windmill , dont forget one windmill requires tonnes of iron to build its tower dummy

Not much cars are mostly plastic now days ​@@winstonwilliams4859

Agree

@TheRastler Public ownership does not solve our energy shortage. The only difference will be that all construction, maintenance and production costs will be shouldered by taxpayers. Nationalising existing energy production willll not magically produce more energy. Two weeks ago the UK's last remaining coal fired power station had to be brought on stream to cope with the surge in demand for electricity. What is needed (20 years too late ) is real investments in nuclear energy.

We are a poor country with an enormous financial offshoring industry and politicians hooked on spending like the big boys. They’ve pawned everything we owned to foreign interests and you have to wonder how many cash 'incentives' were involved.

Idiot comment of the week

Nothing she sold them all off for a pittance probably to pay for her embassy's and her mansion in Portugal.

Fact is CO2 to is not the problem. I refer you to Lord Moncktons 2022 Lecture at Oxford University, Then there is Sir patrick Moores interveiw He.s a marine bioligest from Canada former Green peace co founder. These guys know the Facts and come with prof. you will be enlightened by both men.

Too many people causes all these problems.

Get off of the issue of CO2 - it is totally irrelevant to climate.

Until we have a cicctim that hold polotichions and advisors accountable thay will continue linking there pockets at our expense

Literally in some cases apparently.

The Green deal was a big Con too. These companies jump on the band bandwagon till the money runs out , then the people are left to pay the price.

they are pushing it big time here in CANADA along with the carbon tax on fuel oil but our power bill goes up a lot so what is a person to do .

@@carmanmacbain5976 I used to own a holiday cottage Mont Tremblant, the winter temperatures there often go below minus 30 Celsius for 5 months a year. An air source heat pump extracts heat from the outside air and transfers it to the inside to provide heating and hot water and acts in reverse for cooling purposes. When there are temperatures below zero the system efficiency drops, there are efficiency tables for each machine on the market. There is a limit to how low a temperature the units will operate, which I am certain is minus 25c. So having lived in your beautiful country for 10 years, and paid hydro, which is far from cheap, I would most certainly never install air sourced pumps. I would however install an array of solar panels to give around 8kW of power. Then I would operate an inverter which sources it’s power directly off the solar panels, rather than batteries and a charger to operate baseboard heaters.

Dont be so sensible its not the modern way of thinking

Yeah a good idea but not for our 171 millionaires and billionaires and trillionaires.....

Spot on & at present we are currently in a warm period of a cold cycle in the planets hot and cold cycles, this sounds daft but it's true.

Not sure GB News is on board for real climate issues they seem to be following the Government & main stream thinking on this (Not all of them to be honest)

Yes they lease the seabed (typically for 25 years) up to 12 nautical miles from land to the developers. New projects are moving further off shore, so the Crown Estate will receive nothing from those further off shore projects.

The Royal family do not own or benefit from the Crown Estate.

The SNP have sold off the leases to their largest offshore wind farms to foreign-owned utility companies. The revenue was supposed to be a replacement to oil income. Not sure the SNP would contribute to the Royal estate to the tune of - I believe - £700 million. Worth researching….

The Royals are afflicted with the Climate Delusion and the Energy Transition Delusion.

The royals are WEF puppets.

Same here in the uk. We get taxed 25% green tax

Complete with GT goblin.

Not quite. They do use power for control though.

@@Trevor_Austin does that Power come from diesel generators?

Diesel gen sets are normally installed during construction, so that the WTG can be tested & commissioned. They are not part of the normal design & operation of current OWF turbine designs.

The cost of running the diesel generator is less than the wind companies get paid per kWh, so they make money even when the wind isn't blowing...

Hinkley C is going to kills hundreds of thousands of fish as it sucks up water to keep it cool. Despite stating they would install a fish deterrent, EDF have now reneged and couldn't care less about destroying sealife in the Bristol Channel - far more than and wind farms!!!

Totally agree. Them turbines send down vibrations that effect water life .

There are plenty of free apps and websites that will make an mp3 out of a youtube video. Also free apps and websites that will trim the mp3 so you have just the laugh (I use Audacity). Give it a try if you have a spare hour or so, you'll be the envy of your friends 😄.

...and good riddance. Every reactor is an in-place dirty bomb. We can't have nuclear power plants and cruise missiles in the same world. Much less the idiots that run them.

At a cost of 14 million trees.

@@davidbarlow350 I don't get,,, ripping tree's down for the use of power generation,,, bio mass, sounds great. But has a revers effect on there carbon ethics... produces MORE co2 than I think burning oil.. fortunately for me I'm in the bracket of ,,we need more co2 than less. When havin a debate with a climate fanatic first question,,, what % of the atmosphere is actually made up of life given gas known as carbon. They never have the correct answer.

Not sure on what planet, though. Right?

I would not be surprised if they used maximum rated output for a turbine and extended that to a full year to calculate the energy it will produce. That would be like buying a car that could do 120mph and you know that there are 8760 hours in a year so they project that your car will travel 120 * 8760 = 1,051,200 miles in a year.

Because you landed on one of the ubiquitous Nuclear Energy propaganda pages. They don't seem to know that nuclear emits radioactive gases, liquids, solids and particulates - all the time it generates. Most of them have either never heard of renewables grids and bulk storage, or are trying to cover them up.