Lol. And always mind compatibility.

And also give your smashing robots two hands to make it easier to hold gems instead of holding a clutter of rocks.

the moral of the story is to always bring a power adapter with you

Also don't programm your Robots to behave as irrational and ret. as humans.

Moral of the Story: Scanning robot should have "passed one forward" and given the odd gem to the smashing robot, who then wouldn't have "felt" cheated and might have reciprocated. If not, well, stop scanning for him and find the smashing robot that does reciprocate and you've created the winning team based upon mutual self interest and interlocking trust :)

haha

Reminds me SONY and its proprietary connections in the 90's.

or not murder ur friends

@@rrrohan2288 Is a good option

XD

Exactly!!

You summed up this animation very well!

Well, this was easy. Next question is a little bit harder to answer. Where is greed coming from. They'll tell you it's human nature, but they lie. Correct current answer is "capitalism".

@@AntonBrazhnyk most political beliefs are the same shit

@@dannyguitardrums Most of those willing to keep private property of the means of production, yes. But not all of them are willing.

yes. im agree with this.

Vdd

exactly

Most importantly it was an error to be murderous. Sure, the big robot seemed to want to destroy the smaller one, but all it did eventually was take the gem. Unless the big robot intended to finish the job or destroy the hub - it'd just go ahead on its own. But the small robot went the extra mile, when a point could simply have been made. Curious approaches though. Lighter, more sophisticated and power-efficient scanner-droid from one company, and a bigger "no bullshit, just get it done" nuclear smasher from the other. What does that remind me of...

Words to live by

+Thiird it seems to have a deep message.

+Thiird greed got them both killed

+Raphael Heidemann a powerful message indeed. and the big guy could have broken it again

It's like wall e but it was actually good

+Robotic Apple i would have to agree

The moral is more about greed. Betamax didn't succeed because they didn't want to share their technology. I did like betamax better than Video Home System. Greetings from Mexico

@@mexicopor6818 whoooosh

@@mexicopor6818 Wooosh

Blame porn !

@@mexicopor6818 I never lived that era to comment authoritatively .. but I was told ( by ppl then and internet) that VHS gave their recording tech for free to porn industry and hence everyone had to buy VHS players ... Sometimes the most important cornerstones in tech are moved by simple business tricks .. it's humans who use it after all .. the only weak point in tech 😂😂

or just alternate odd rocks

yeah... one would assume binary entities should be capable of solving such trivial math....

Or maybe calculate the mass, and sever it in a correct order

Perhaps the value isn't based purely on mass

Exactly what I thought! I’d say alternate, but they were down to basic communication, so hard to get across that concept & maintain trust

Согласен

Greed

... or the small robot could've been nice and given it to the big robot and taken the next odd one itself, or it could've kept on pondering on what to do with the last crystal until the big robot stepped in and either gave it to the small robot, or took it itself. Moral of the story: If you're the one to make the choice, always remember your privilege in being the one making the choice and the fact that the others count on you to be fair, and therefore always prioritize others before yourself. In that way, you'll never seem selfish, and it will never be your fault if things go sour.

@@fiskedunser6314 I disagree. It can totally be your fault depending on the context of the situation, and while giving the big robot the extra rock would have been a selfless act, the bigger robot might conclude that they can easily take advantage of the smaller one's kindness by pressuring them to always give the big robot the bigger share every time.

That's why they are robots I guess

@@BatFlightThylacine "It can totally be your fault depending on the context of the situation" Do you have an example? Also, yes I know the small robot can be taken advantage of, that's why I wrote: "it will never be your fault if things go sour." But the fact of the matter is that in real life, in many situations, there wouldn't be a hidden 4th brownie under the dinner table. So in a lot of situations, you can't just wait for the extra item (whatever that item may be) to appear and make it an even number in total. Either you (or whoever you're sharing with) has to make a choice on who gets the 3rd brownie, and if it's you, 99% of the time, it's better to lose 1 brownie than to potentially lose a friendship - and if that friend takes advantage of you and takes both the 4th brownie AND the 4th cookie (when they arrive on the table), ...well then you may have lost both extra desserts, but at least you didn't lose a friendship, since, turns out, he/she wasn't a friend after all!

*thing

+Diore Antonio *edit

+Doge ssshush dog you can't English right now

+Diore Antonio Greed is the primary reason the world isn't as horrible as it used to be.

+Diore Antonio You're kinda right... Greed is the primary and only directive under which we all function. EVerything we do is according to what we want.

I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. John 15:5

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush?

That's true..😊

Ah yes. Aesop.

Fox and the crow. - Crow has cheese. Fox praises crow’s voice. Crow sings, drops cheese. Fox eats.

Aesop's fable, inherited from ancient Rome, if I am not mistaken.

"Masterpiece of story telling " ??? Its an 8 minute cartoon for gods sakes !

@@ethics3 Chill out Dick head. There's always one in the bunch that tries to spoil everything. Your mommy must be proud of you.

@@Rufio1975 he's right though. It's hardly a masterpiece. Everybody just throws around words like they don't have any meaning or context. It seems to me like it's you that has your nuts in a ruck pal *That's not too say it isn't fine or a lot of work hasn't gone into it, it's just not a master piece

@@ethics3 why do people think their words carry any weight? No one gives a shit about your opinion.

Jesus Christ is the King 👑 of salvation and he loves you

Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved. Romans 10:13 💙✨

I was thinking that!

+Caolán Tominey me too :D

true!

This reminds me of machinarium

Jon me too

+hello universe two...

+hello universe I think real robots wouldn't do that, unless true AI exists in this, and if it's in the future

too robots? too companies? wait... "too"?

composer zero -Two*-

so anyone could tell me why binary creatures should or even could be like this?

@@therandomlaniusedward2140 this pov kind of makes you a misanthrope.

@@koala7254 maybe it's because of their directive to collect minerals. They probably were engineered to work independently, and the programmer might not inserted other directives.

@@koala7254 Thats not a misanthrope point of view.

@@priyanshupradhan2342 i did a comment on something "the random ianus edward" wrote. (something like "misanthropes don't deserve to live" ) he deleted it afterwards. i did not comment ömer san.

One from Apple and one from Microsoft :)

+ariel kurachi !

Hhhhh ... greed will happen again ... it is better with robots. Cause we are worse.

@@TheFriendlyFascist The bigger one was more efficient thought it didnt have a scanner, because it inevitably wouldve collected more green rock thingys The scanner robot couldnt have smash those big rocks to gather crystals though, only able to find ones in the open which wouldve been very unlikely

@@grandovercrap3014 still, think about how many green rocks the smasher robot probably crawled right by without realizing for however long it had been stationed there mining.

@@lss7850 every rock in its' path, or at random, depending on how it was made. But every rock would be a bit of a task for one smasher bot I'd imagine

It’s not about robots it’s about us!!!!

wdym first?

Turns out they not only can, they did! Lol

Yeah this was like a depressing version of Wall-E lol

I agree. They could've been best friends. There was so much sadness in the optics of the bigger robot when the small robot betrayed him, can't... 😭😭😭 And that little robo was so cute! 😢

Stephen Hawkings did for me

It could've just simply put the green rock on the ground and wait until they get more rocks

Thank you!

+NanoForest Hey Vsauce

me

+NanoForest DONG

+NanoForest yep me

+NanoForest Me :)

Thanks you! Yes!! Huge inspiration

+Андрей Иванов это роботы по добыче ценных пород, что с них взять?

+Алексей Фамильевский Да епта, охуительные роботы с три-д сканерами, нейронной сетью для эмуляции детской психики и характера, не смог отложить сраный камень на следующий раз.

+Андрей Иванов Как будто это фильм про роботов... Это фильм про людей. Людская недальновидность бывает подчас не менее вопиюща, чем на видео. И последствия - похожие.

bormisha Как будто я писал о смысле, заложенном в этой короткометражке. ;)

They should have compromised

More like every war ever.

@@mugwump7049 nope, i'd disagree, there are things worth fighting for imo. Like life liberty, pursuit of happiness, etc...

@@surrealengineering7884 That was not the point. You originally argued "now", which implies it used to be different. War has always been a massive loss on both sides. The only winners in any war are the arms dealers.