Is that a!?

How to look in reverse?

I’m watching this video in the normal way, again outsmarting you by outsmarting your outsmarting

@@yeeehees2973 Everyone outsmarting, reverse in comment this writing me

¿esrever ni oediv a hctaw uoy od woH

Hi Jerry! I'm subscribed to your channel, keep up the great work you are doing man. Cheers!

lol the fact that this comment was made 5 years ago and someone commented on this 5 days ago.. LOL

AJ GAMING Now it’s been five years and one day ago; and five days and and one day ago.

Hi Jerry!

Hii this is jerry

LOL! How many people didn't get the reference? Well played.

LOL

Chcess players here xX

What do you mean smooth?!

@@pijusgreicius7025 You should see his awkward interview with Magnus carlsen not( smooth ) and u will understand

Noop

He did give a chess lesson: practice what a GM practices- chunking, pattern recognition, stepping-stone position and retro grade anaylsis

@@gordocar3520 i didnt understand what chunking and stepping stone Position mean? Does anyone understand that?

@@srbishkrst there's something called Google, you didn't know Multiplications just after your teacher said that to you.

@@herlingaaland LOL!

i know if i have 5 i won't ask for trade because if u have 6 u won't trade... what i fail to understand, if i have 3 or 4 why wouldn't i or you trade ?

Adeel Malik if you have a 4, you know a 6 would not trade and a 5 would not trade (if we assume rational persons). So a 4 wont trade rationally. Now if you have a 3, you know, that 4,5,6 dont trade. In the same manner a 2 doesnt trade. So only the 1 will trade because you will get a higher number 100%. You could trade a 2 though if you believe your counterpart is not acting rationally. And for most humans thats probably the case.

William YamYam To me this is just prediction at its best, removing all the fun from games. It's like explaining a sports game by pure physics and chemistry, over than luck, passion and willpower. Sure it's interrelated, and maybe only a matter of time before mastering it. But imagine this card problem between two "grandmasters" : the simple fact that one of them asks "I want to trade" means it has a one in hand. So why bother, it just has to say "Well, victory is yours good sir, well done." without even looking at the results, like machines. If neither of them has a one, they'll just keep their number without saying anything and see who's f*cked by probabilities. That's how I picture their chess games, that's also probably how other statistics fields like finance works. Dehumanizing things to get close to that 100% winning situation.

+William YamYam I disagree, i think he failed to mention that others would be playing along. He said "you and I" and repeated several times and then changed the rules by saying 4 other people (i presume) also picked up a card.

+William YamYam However, it has a fault. The fault is that it is possible the other person is not assuming you are purely rational. See, it's two stages away from first person conception. A person may have a 3, and hope you will trade up for a 4 or 5. Considering he's more than likely to lose with a 3, he feels behind the 8 ball and hopes you'll bite. Here's an illustration of the problem. A man is sentenced to be executed sometime next week. However, the man is told that the day he is executed will be a total surprise to him, there is no way to know in advance when he will be executed. That means that we know one thing for sure to start: that he won't be executed on Saturday. If he's not dead by Friday, he knows when it is coming. That rules out Saturday. But since we know it CANT be Saturday, there is now certainty that if he isn't killed by Thursday, he'll definitely be killed on Friday. So he can't be killed on Friday either. With Friday and Saturday ruled out, we now know that he can't be killed on Thursday, because he'd know on Wednesday that he was getting killed on Thursday. So on and so forth, and you've ruled out every day of the week. Its a paradoxical judgement. Right? Unless he is simply executed on any of the days, which would be a total surprise, something he could never have seen coming. Retrograde Analysis is a tool in the logical belt, but it can't be used for every problem. In games, this is where a person who is good but not great loses to a novice with "beginner's luck", who is simply making irrational decisions.

Yes. That's how beginners are taught in Art classes

Like bro,obviously you know what I do when you don’t know me LESSS I want you guys you want me and my friends and you and your mom do it and you guys can !This how we resolve probleme

You upload cool videos good job

This really reminds me of King Solomon's phrase, already old and experienced: "Remember your Creator in the days of your youth, before the days of trouble come and the years approach when you will say, 'I find no pleasure in them' ". Even with many warnings and signs, not realizing the existence of the Creator and living as if he doesn't exist seems to be the biggest mistake of people. Perhaps if they could come to the end and understand what Solomon said, they would seek to know Jesus Christ deeply, and everything He did for us, as He came from heaven, served men, performed many signs and miracles, and was killed for our sins, loving us to the point of dying on a cross, that we might have life. And by the power of the Creator, he rose on the third day, and is seated at His right hand. Perhaps with Solomon's warning, you will understand how incredible God's love is and how he loves you personally, to the point of giving his own life for you.

I still doesn't quite understand about the meaning of this video

Did this alot in me physics and maths problems. Especially objective questions. Felt like i was cheating. :-)

how exactly do u do it?

@@waffy8798 well from the question i could tell that the answer is a group 1 or 2 metal, so i tried every group 1&2 metal until i came to the initial value. basically trial and error working backwards. there’s many ways to work things backwards!

in math especially proofs this is a skill that is taught

Em exatas, esse método é muito viável.

Well,if there's only forcing moves,then gms can see 15-20moves....but if the opponent has 2-3 good replies..than it's hard to plan..even 5-7 moves

he cant see 10 moves ahead at all..

@@nanobruh Fischer once said he can see 15-20 forced moves ahead..I mean it's not that heard to calculate forced moves

@@redrum9678 its just flexing if its really forcing then you can calculate infinitely deep as there is always an only move....

@@nanobruh I told the same fuckin thing mate

163 Reasons Why Real Estate Agents Fail check out Levar Kizer on UKposts chess master rap

I don't think you can see through the end game. It is not feasible. However, when you play chess, you need to pay attention to your end game pawn structure. One pawn structure with even rows is more preferable than equal, but with double pawns or stand alone pawns. This helps to ultimately win. You steer the game move by move to worsen your opponents position and then promote a pawn. GM Karpov was a big influencer in this strategy.

I don't think Maurice was trying to give life advice not chess advice

Yes over until %44

@@curtisw0234 life any%speedrun

Best ending ever.

i don't get it.

brostepisthebest It means that if you know how life will be when you're older, you'll be less active and eventually die, you'll soend the time while you're younger doing things you want and being happy and doing things rather than wasting that time and regretting it when it's too late (when you're old)

Ian Byrne But what if wasting time is what makes you happy

Ian Byrne that still didn’t make sense to me

can u explain about backwards planning. I still dont get it

I'm on to you. Although, seems no one else spotted this in 2 years lol

RedVisor 137c y

What a nonsense comment

Theo Pana it has 38 more likes than you do tho

@@BrothersandCoFilms I don't measure value in internet points but it's cool that you do

@NihilisticEntropy i mean your blaming them for something that wont really help you in life all that much

@@qwerty1233787 his comment has more likes than the number of braincells you have

500-1300 be like:

And lastly you realise you are the advantage

Why is thi my life!

Never resign

Just use a chess engine

You can only connect them looking backwards.

Oh please. That's getting old.

So are you. What are you going to do about it?

Jesus...really? It was a great talk. I'm sure you would get up there and just kill it.

@alfa-psi yep. lol

at least he is a great player. Or wait, is he ?

lol backward from comments the reading am I now

sdrawkcab yllaer s'tahT

@@noefillon1749 on

Minh Đào Phú Yeah, that's what is happening with reading it backwards too. You have to focus on each word, and so you don't skip over it.

that right

it's not my first language either but i didn't see it.

i always start mazes from the end

lol i thought i was the only guy who did that

I believe most people start at the end, except for some cognitive incapacity or superhuman ability that would not need to analyze other paths but automatically correct the correct one.

@@alexborges3599 appreciate it man

If no one will trade with 4, 5 or 6 then why would you trade with 3? You could only lose.

I have the same question

The lyrics include "take me back to the start."

Something mundane and boring?

The music video? Lol

Ricardo Vulcano check out Levar Kizer on UKposts Asymmetrical Warfare

Ya good stuff

nice second and there buddy

kinda exponential i guess

reading your elaboration, I now understand analysing backward.

in math terms, 2 power of 59 and 2 power of 60.

Speaking on heads he has quite a cranium on him

nope G4

OMG Thank You !!!! Just watched the video in 2021 😂

Why does this have no likes?

damn it

But it's imposible to have a knowledge of the end before the begining.

Thanks captain obvious

Thoodu

Thoodu itn

What do you mean? Magicians will work with your intuition and reactions while they are doing the trick, that would be the equivalent of you reading a text that passes through the screen without having time for any type of different reading or analysis (if you are seeing it for the first time). Also, many magical tricks are incredibly hard to figure out even with mutiple viewings and different types of analysis, so I'm not sure you picked a good example.

🤣

I understood that reference