Yea, they even catch on fire better then the other cars

bonsai treehouse moron

@@MichaelOrtega Tesla's have caught on fire. "Parked Teslas Keep Catching on Fire Randomly, And There's No Recall In Sight " www.thedrive.com/news/28420/parked-teslas-keep-catching-on-fire-randomly-and-theres-no-recall-in-sight

Arty Artem So? I had a truck catch on fire while I was driving home from the store many years ago...didn’t stop me from driving ice cars then, or now. Burnt the entire cab and engine up in about two minutes. Quite spectacular.

@@DS-vx3wf that's old news and and all of that is caused by Tesla short sellers, they did it on purpose so that Tesla's reputation collapsed

Mark Zanghetti but definitely expensive and not a very practical design

@@kerbodynamicx472 Rimac Isn't entirely focused on manufacturing car i believe. That's just the face of this great Croatian company. He's a great guy with a great story & cool personality.

@@monirulmaruf Right, their cars just show what is possible with their technology. It's more of a "side-business". They are supplying parts to other automotive brands. They are building Koenigsegg's drive train for their electric models. Porsche is shareholder - I think it's 15% of their shares and are working on projects together (maybe they were also involved in the Taycan). Kia and Hyundai are participating in Rimac. They are working with all german brands expect BMW, etc. The Pininfarina Battista, which is also shown in the video, is based on the Rimac C_Two. It has the same platform and I believe the drive train is also supplied by Rimac. I think that's how they make money and not only building supercars. It's more of a tech-company. That's what makes them so interesting. While other brands only do the design and use many parts from other companies(even motors - Pagani uses AMG motors), they develop everything on their own.

@@veky5717 Exactly. Selling technology is their primary bussiness. Also one spanish supercar is just a licenced Rimac Concept One.

Rimac specializes in battery technology and the car is technically a showcase of his products.

It's the natural progression and no pesky emissions standards to meet.

We had to! Not everyone gets to work on time!!

@J Tay: What shocked me was that - according to this video - electric cars came before internal combustion engine cars. I simply didn’t know that.

@@bikdav Very True David!!

When you have a mountain of money, you will see a luxury car like a candy, you buy it just want to know how it feels then move on to another candy

the future is not all electric. the future is: - electromagnetic - anti gravity - free energetic

@@astralseeker you don't know what you are talking about. Put on your tinfoil hat and quit bulshitting. All current electric cars are electromagnetic, there is no anti gravity and I don't even know what free energetic is supposed ro mean. Tough there is no free energy if you also belive that crap.

Tesla isn't as bespoke or has a carbon fiber chassis, I'm pretty sure its heavy as hell.

@@nocashirl lol You're just a lowly creature who doesn't know anything.

😀😁🤣

That was stupid

there is no car in space

It's not orbiting the earth but is on a similar orbit to Mars, so it's orbiting the sun! 😃

@@garethrobinson2275 it's a cgi science fiction tale dude. c'mon!

most supercars are in that price range. what's weird is all these other all electric cars selling for hypercar prices.

But you do have to wait for it's release before saying this

@KUILIN JIANG Tesla must know this.

Also maybe because it’s not in production and all of those are just guessed topspeed and guessed acceleration 0-60?

its not official yet

Tesla are in a different ball game. They are only months away from announcing the new 1mil mile battery life aswell

But it's not out, so don't get your hopes up

@@user-nq6ln1wv8b all of these cars not out

@@user-nq6ln1wv8b so are the others

The name is a giant as well.When I get my cybertruck I'll name it 'Nikola'.

Everything’s great about it except theres no loud engine or exhaust

@M.L 🙄🙄🙄

2.1 seconds as base is disappointing

@@user-nq6ln1wv8b 1.9 you mean

@@user-nq6ln1wv8b it’s 1.9 base 1.1 with the space x version

I don’t believe there would be actual boosters, can you imagine the amount of deaths and court cases with fast acceleration and high top speeds,

@@oliverbird6233 probably not this would 10 g force on your body if you are not an astronaut

Kyle Hubb the Tesla Roadster will be out. But I’m sure you said that same BS about the Tesla Model S, X, 3 and Y.

@Israel ‘lasagne’ Adesanya well thats fine, cuz im spending literally a fraction of gt3 anyway, it might not be the fastest car but it's obviously the smartest purchase!

m_si2r you do know a gt3 costs less... I also doubt that you’re buying one anyway.

@A_003 tesla way more convenient...

Yeah, I live in the century of funny people, that all people think that "brand means quality" Give a freaking chance for new school companies!

@MJ Mail Bruh

Those are Model S stats.

@@davidbeppler3032 model s 0-60 is actually 2.3 in produced 2019 version :) and check its price, way less than other pompetitors like its ridiculuos

I put my deposit down on the 3 motor truck. I think Elon should make all Teslas 4 motor vehicles.

@@dieseldog00 If it were easy, he would do it on the Roadster. It's not because it's hard to create enough down-force (at lower speeds like 0-20). The torque is basically being lost because there isn't enough friction between the wheels and the road. John Carmack suggested that the Space-X package could use cold air jets to generate some downforce to convert more of the torque on launch into faster speed. He's just guessing, but he's a really smart guy and good at guessing...

That... Is the stupidest thing I've ever heard

@@descendency Just because a car is faster in a straight line doesn't mean it beats a supercar. Even heavily modified Supras can crush supercars ina a drag race

if you don't know what you're talking about, don't talk please 💀💀

I respect what Rimac has achieved but I'd go for Tesla even if money was no object. Love Tesla's looks and not a fan of the C2's looks.

I'm sorry when did the tesla roadster released? Did i miss the debut?

@@Bahamuttiamat 2017 debut and first production model is to be released in december this year !!!

@Mesophyl you do realize that engineering is different from production, right?

Mesophyl until tesla u fool

"Rimmer" ?

Me to my fan tesla. Roadster

Me to

Probably the Volkswagen Idr will be an extremely good competition in that area

its impossible for u to get sub 2 second 0- 60

@@elvpse the tesla plaid is litterally 0-60 in 1.9 seconds

Liar

Only 200k. Lmao. Car ain't worth no damn 200k. The new model s is just as fast. Similar range and it's much bigger for 80 thousand less.

@@sleasy01 dude roadster isnt even launched yet so hold your horses.

@@namanpahuja7653 you saying that to say what tho?

Same. u smart to

Richard Hammond likes this comment xb

Rimac way too high. The C2 is pushing $2mil. Tesla has got a new long run batt which should give their cars 500+miles and million mile longevity.

Have they started selling the roadster?

@@dieseldog00 Rimac has been testing. Roadster 2 hasn't even left the factory yet. It's all good talking about value but at least one of them exists. 🤷

@@aslanbayramuqlany6189 No. It was supposed to be this year but they were never gonna reach that target. The virus gives them breathing room. Expect nothing before the tail end of 2021.

Basically, first of all it barely has any "trunk space" and is practically built wrapped perfectly around the components with only space for a small to mid sized driver leaned back in racing position and a passenger doing the same. It is also wind tunnel optimized with air channels going through out the car (like the Buggati Chiron) and is built with the shape also purely focused on aerodynamics as initially optimized by physics modelling software connected to machine learning models that use all that data to build more organic shapes for better performance while staying within strength, endurance and stability limits set by the designers and engineers (it is a bit more complicated than that of course but that is just the simple explanation.) Now remember how I said the driver is leaned back and low, well that isn't the only thing that is low, the optimization and physics of air resistance tells us that a car this "small" should be extremely low to the ground for optimal acceleration and it does just that, it hits under the 1 meter mark which means this thing cuts through air like a knife through hot butter, the whole design is based around keep it as low as possible and that is why like F1 drivers, the car interior is build leaning back so you can keep it that low even when the driver might be double the cars height (that is also why the car is a bit long (think triangles, to get the height of the triangle down, you need the driver who is the hypotenuse to be leaning back really far, but that makes the length of the triangle really long because the size of the hypotenuse aka the driver can't change.) Now these are all great, but what really makes it shine is obviously going to be the core components, aka the 4 powerful electric motors (two front-two back of course because AWD means more grip, better traction means better acceleration) which have software to optimize grip during any sort of turns based on sensor data from each individual wheel. Honestly every part on this car is custom and amazing with only one intent, faster acceleration, yes, even the windows were built to make this car go just that little bit faster. Other than that, it has all the performance features that most super-cars have these days, active wing, carbon fiber body, the whole deal. Oh and yes, 2000hp at 4100 lbs, that is bugatti levels of weight with higher performance than a bugatti. A friend of mine left Porsche to work for Aspark 6 years ago and a lot of his acquaintances thought he was crazy for leaving what is a dream job for most to instead go work for some company that none of them had ever even heard of, but I knew that the design and the engineering for performance is what had always been his drive, he was a racing fan like myself and we had grown up watching Le Mans together, these last two-three years have been very stressful but rewarding for him, but he is glad he left when he did because he says his team at Aspark is just so much more passionate and hardworking, and that the culture of respect and brotherhood in Japan makes for great work culture. I'm going to have to get him to help work on a custom EV project with me if he ever moves back to the states, I need some of those trade secrets.

Yea not liek ugly gasoline

And now Nevera

Frank Sun Tesla still isn’t in production yet 😂

@@ToyotaCorolla-qs7ml And so are the others!

Puting 30 k in a sleeper car will smoke anything apart from teslas on the road

Tesla has also Croatian orgin 👍

Still not faster than a 80's Dodge on gasoline, though. They still have a lot to improve.

its a american website primarily watched by Americans and since Americans are so dam smart that they are taught both metric and imperial so its not an issue to the primary audience.

1 mile = 1,6 km, ex. 300mile x 1,6 = 480km, what is so hard to calculate, yes I know laziness ??!!

@@alincuc2882 if you are watching a vid where they say 45kmph (for example) most people are not gonna calculate that also, us is the only part of the world that use imperial system.

@@miguellopez3392 American are so damn smart? ever see the winner of international science olympiad? reyna find one you so damn prouded "American" compare to those from other part of the world, even a member of "American" team that had won recently. My point is don't to think you are that better, see the whole world.

Tesla also plans to produce thousands of them unlike the other as well.

Check insurance costs

Joseph Tucciarone , where did you get the 1.56 0-60 time ?

@@shepherdsknoll8 make sense for rocket package booster it's not about the horsepower anymore in top category and their wall you called tire grip and theit a fundamental limit on that. To counter that limitation a rocket is necessary to propel the car faster than any real time world record ever made in history.

@@chillrawr9603 its not a rocket, its a cold gas thruster, it may help by shoving the car towards the ground for better grip.

But as well HOW QUICK IT CAN CHARGE.

check out the leaked of the 1m mile battery. there you have it

I think you answered your own question: "forgot to mention"

@@John-wx6wj I think that was the question

@amarjit singh my question was not about China I simply asked why the fact was not mentioned. I felt it was odd and was asking him about the omission

@Amarjit Singh Dhesi where were you all this time dear BTW nano has 34 patents to show dont find that we always find ways to insult it be positive man we have to respect ourselves to get respect from others also search for "Mahindra is dissolving Pininfarina" (not something to be proud of)

Acceleration isn’t everything, and the extra 2 million dollars spent on the Nevera largely goes into its extreme handling performance. The Tesla roadster will handle far worse than hypercars like the Rimac Nevera. For anything other than drag strips it will be slower than even much less powerful cars. And in terms of acceleration it’s not even that big of a deal, you can build a drag car for 100k$ that can do the quarter mile faster than a roadster.

@@brianoconnor4269 we are talking factory stock here and will pass emissions test...

but is ugly.

actually it will be the fastest and quickest car as theres is a spacex rocket thrusters edition. im guessing 1.5 sec 0-60 bet

And the fact that... it will exist

@@AngelloCustoms for me it's look amazing

Obviously the rimac concept 1 is the superior option because it’s the only one here that’s actually in production

If you look it up you are able to move the driving seat from right to the centre so for example if you are doing a track day you have optimal driving position in the centre and when on the road you have the seat on the right so you can see past the car in front, they’re are other seats also

miles goldstein seems par for the course right?

Are you dumb?

@@drivewithanam he is right.

the roadster is also more practical and has more integrated tech

What do you mean?

7:44 bar chart in the video says it all :)

You get what you pay for.

@@LemonySnicket-EUC buying a car for millions of dollars is like buying a phone with a gold case but it's worse than an iPhone 6. You get what you pay for, is a gold case

@@paperhouse6282 yes. You pay for the speed, the rarity and the craftsmanship. The interior of the Tesla is basically plastic. I'm still highly excited for it, since Tesla will wipe the floor with the shitty Chiron

@@sabersz Tesla roadster uses carbon fiber for the interior ukposts.info/have/v-deo/paB5ZJdrboBmrY0.html

What?

wtf

When an pure electric car beats an f1 car around a circuit, then i'll change my perspective.

@@Bahamuttiamat That already happened with concept cars accelerating to 100 below the standard of the Tesla Roadster. 1.65 seconds was the fastest. But F1 is limited between 1 - 100 according to Alonso on Reddit. And this is the challenge. You ask an EV production car owned and driven by a consumer like you and me, that has to last 10 years and 100.000 miles (160000 km) to outperform an extremely fine-tined racemonster in F1 that is not even able to last longer than 3 hours or 500 kilometers without major repairs, two tire changes and on-the-fly fine-tuning by a team of 20 to 50 specialists. Once you have driven an electric car and found you could with great ease outpace any Porsche at the traffic lights or highway, then you know there is a new kid on the block that won't go away.

I know that electric cars, especially Teslas, are crazy fast, more efficient and offer a lot more for a lot less money than some of the premium brands. We petrolheads understand that. We will applaud you and then drive away in our internal combustion engine cars, smiling to ourselves. These 0-60 times hardly attract us because we know that although they feel like a whiplash, they don't have the soundtrack or theatrics or the appeal of say, a naturally aspirated v10. And if it's a manual transmission gearbox then that fun is exponentially increased even cornering at around 60 mph. I guess it's going to divide people into 2 kinds of drivers: 1. those who just care about the fastest 0-60, efficiency and sometimes even to show off to their friends in drag races. 2. Those who appreciate every little sensation that a really exquisite ICE car delivers. These people drive out to enjoy their cars and enjoy the roads and the views while listening to the revs building up and falling down as they shift through gears, and these are the drivers who will never feel thrilled driving an electric car.

@The Philosopher of Culture Sorry friend, you sound uninformed. Where exactly is the tesla roadster? It isn't on sale and not one has been delivered to customers. F1 engines are designed to last over 5 thousand kms. That said, the new ev's are impressive at acceleration. Driving isn't all about going in a straight line. One doesn't buy a porsche for 0-60. When an ev can keep up in the twisty bits - real driving. Then I'll accept the future with open hands. Electrics cars, mainly their power source is too heavy. The motor itself is superior to any ICE but batteries are far inferior to fossil fuel.

Lee Morris Precisely my thoughts. Power is pointless. Peace and comfort for me every time

Those cars are so rare, you probably won't even see them once. Its toys for the rich people and you drive them as fast as you want on a race track. Also your point with global renewable energy is just straight up bullshit. The technology is far from that away.

"If I ever drive again, it will be a 50mph top speed vehicle, what luxury that will be, sitting back... gliding along... to perhaps get some ice cream, in an electric or hydrogen powered vehicle, knowing on my journey I have damaged not even one single life in the process" well you cant since hydrogen or battery production is still harmful to the environment, hydrogen infrastructure cannot b achieved in 1 year, logistically impossible and would loose to gas/diesel/BEV fairly quickly on the market, BEV with renewable + hydrogen backup energy storage is the only outcome i see in the next 40 years.

Vectored indeed

Theyre not trying, it's the side effect of going electric. Of course their main goal is range.

And the car would literally drive all day 96 kph with a range of 900+ that's about 10 hours of continuous driving. Have you not been paying attention?

Which crackhead did that napkin math, because even with the best tires and setup for drag racing, no amount of power will be able to hit even close to that.

149?

yes true but tesla is the biggest company currently and there are universal charging ports

best electric car is being made in California, ive seen the battery, its off the shelf cells wrapped in carbon fiber, nothing special about it, for 2 million dollars they better be making the cars carfully.