😂. You need two kids, one in you left ear and one in your right, perennially asking “are we there yet?” You never left......you never arrive. Just the endless journey, purely observed.

Underrated comment

A surprisingly clever joke. Nice job!

haha top joke

Ooooh so that explains the collapsed brain function while setting off on a family vacation....

All the so called great philosophical minds of the past have been nothing but trolls but it went so far over the heads of normal people back then they thought it was somehow profound. You just solved philosophy. Like you know, one does...

We present a measure of quantum coherence by employing the concept of noncommutativity of operators in quantum mechanics. We analyse the behaviour of this noncommutative coherence and underline its similarities and differences with the conventional measures of quantum coherence. The maximally noncommutative coherent states turn out to be far removed from the conventionally considered maximally coherent states. We argue that the efficiency of the quantum phase estimation algorithm, an important rung in the Shor factorisation algorithm, is potentially related to the measure of noncommutative coherence." Matt O'Dowd just needs to dig a bit deeper - he's Anti-Trolling.

@@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885 was about to say that.

*metaphysical trolling !

The best part is the freeze-frame of a Weeping Angel right after it.

@@JonathanScarlet A watt?

@@hiccup3.14 Re-watch at around 4:59. Blink (or not) and you'll miss it.

@@JonathanScarlet ahhh ok, Thankyou very much

As soon as he started talking about looking at the arrow to stop it from hitting you, I figured a "don't blink" reference was inevitable was (unlike being hit by a quantum arrow)

I am in immense pain

The quantum arrow never existed until you observed it anyway, so technically, not only did you do this to yourself, but you also confirmed that this is how you wanted things to be by blinking. Kids these days... Well, at least you're still alive.

no lollygagging

Ever thought about the second entangled arrow with it? It may have tunneled and hit another adventurer of space-time. And you know what he didn't even blinked! But you only think about yourself 🙂

Lemme guess someone stole your quantum roll?

@@anmolmehrotra923 I too used to be a pan-dimensional being, until I took a quantum arrow to the knee...

He wouldn't if you hadn't blinked

Doctor?

And the angles wept

I frikkin hate those!!!

I laughed for about 5 min straight. Part of why I love this channel

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

if you do end up studying physics, fair bit of warning: you're in for a treat.

@@slevinchannel7589 HBomberguy is great! A very different genre though…

@@vauchomarx6733 Yep

PBS Spacetime is cool, but imo, there are even greater physics channels out there. Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky (ukposts.info) has some beautifully made animations, which gave me a much better intuition for understanding that sort of stuff, I heavily recommend checking them out!

Famously

Weeping Angel from the episode "Blink" ;)

I was expecting the angels to make an appearance, wasn't disappointed.

Can anyone explain the reference?

@Franky Padilla baby don't hurt me

@@INGIE32 It refers to an iconic Doctor Who episodes called "Blink", where the antagonists (aka Weeping Angels) can only move when they're unobserved. So to survive them the rule is simple: keep your eyes open and don't blink.

That's the first time I've heard it referred to like that, and I love it.

@@blackmamba1261 Well. From what I understand is a pretty good description. A lot of philosophers seem to have been annoyed at Zeno. Even some contemporary ones to his own age.

The effect of "not sure if really dumb, or just proved the whole universe wrong" type stuff.

He is one of my favourite philosophers. I am not sure what that says about me... >_>

@Baka Mitai Oh, he is a fun one to. Has a fascinating idea what makes for a good home. ;)

WOW: Have you seen the newest video of FTFE (Fight the Flat Earth)? It's amazing.

The Many-Worlds interpretation and Zeno is pure none sense there is only One-World and the Motion-Time is continues you cannot divide them.

@@slevinchannel7589 I'm seriously 🤔

@@elongatedmusk3132 FTFe is a Channel? Was that not clear? And so is Holy Koolaid, just so you know.

@@slevinchannel7589 I put curious or something & that emoji got hit. Anyways thnx I'll check em out

but is it like wave or there is comes in packets of plank-ouches?

I'd love to see that term included in movie technobabble.

Don't Blink!

Followed by the sequel, Quantum Abort.

If you pay attention you hear it coming after the Quantum Twang.

Underated! Great poem!

Interesting, I can actually recognize some words from the poem as probably meaning certain things, even though I don't speak Old Norse. Ef = if, sék = see (seek), skotinn = shoot, flýgra = fly, at stǫðvigak = to stop, sjónum = keep (sojourn). How accurate is this? Given that there are fewer words in the original poem, I'm assuming that each word carries more info that is normally spread across multiple English words. English did descend from this language, though it's gone through a lot of changes since then.

@@Greywander87 *On the relationship between Old Norse and English* Parts of the English language descends directly from Old Norse, but in fact all of the similarities in this poem are due to the fact that Old English and Old Norse were sister languages. That is, English and Old Norse have a common ancestral language (Proto-Germanic) from which these similar words ultimately are respectively derived from. Some of the words you recognise are correct. _ef_ is indeed related to English _if_ , although _ef_ was pronounced with a /v/ sound, i.e. /ev/. However _sék_ is a contraction of _sé ek_ , literally "see I" . Same with _stǫðvigak_ (< _stǫðviga ek_ ) and _kank_ (< _kann ek_ ), which literally mean "stop-not-I (it)" and "can-I". With the modern English word order and grammar you would instead say "I see", "I won't stop (it)" and "I know" in this context, but in Old Norse you had more liberty with regards to the word order and when to use pronouns like _it_ . Furthermore _sjónum_ means "with (my) sight" in this context, and is the dative form of the noun _sjón_ , meaning "sight" or "eyes". Just think about the past tense form _seen_ of the verb _to see_ , and you will see the relationship. Also note that _j_ in Old Norse is pronounced like /y/ in modern English. The English /j/ sound that you find in English words like _jet_ , _giant_ and _age_ is non-existent in Old Norse. Also, some of the verbs carry the short-lived negation ending _-a_ (sometimes _-at_ or simply _-t_ ), like in _flýgra_ < _flýgr-_*_a_* (literally "(it) flies-not"), same in _stǫðvigak_ < _stǫðvig-_*_a_*_ ek_ . (The latter expression here is incidentally a monster of a contraction _stǫðvigak_ < _stǫðva-ek-a-ek_ , quite literally "stop-I-not-I (it)". _stǫðva_ is thus the verb part of the word and means "to make stood", i.e. "to stop".) Other similar words are: _þat_ - "that" ( _þ_ is pronounced like _th_ ) _af_ - "of" (the Old Norse _of_ you see in the poem is actually related to English _ov-_ in _over_ ) _í_ - "in" ( _í_ was pronounced nasally in Old Norse, meaning it must have previously had an /n/ sound following it that was nasalised) _folki_ (dative of _folk_ ) - "folk/army" _svá_ - "so"

@@Greywander87 *On the word count* As you probably can tell from my previous comment, Old Norse could make use of contractions that make it seem like there are fewer words. They also had a grammatical case structure that Old English also had, but that modern English has lost. (You can tell from the endings _-i_ in _fári_ and _folki_ , and _-um_ in _sjónum_ .) This means that in Old Norse you could sometimes convey meaning without using prepositions by simply using specific grammatical cases, hence the word count would go down: _Gefk hónum vápn_ ("I am giving a weapon to him"); Old Norse uses three words here compared to seven in English. I also took the liberty to add words that aren't present in the original for clarification in my translation, since the Old Norse poem is composed in a special poetic language in which you have to conserve the amount of syllables in each line, thus the word count goes down. This is because the poem otherwise loses its rhythm in Old Norse. To keep the rhythm in English that has a higher word count, more words are naturally required.

I was thinking the same thing. The old ones understood quantum mechanix. I'm convinced celtic knots represent quantum systems.

observation is just another word for interaction

First time I've seen an episode end without an elegant sentence ending in ... spacetime.

​ @Len Arends The sentence has 2 meanings: - You know it doesn't boil because you watched it - you know why it happened because you watched space time I think it's pretty elegant

This was a cheat ending.

Roadhouse

Spacetime loves sci-woo.... It's another Modern Mystery Cult media outlet.... It's named after 'MAGIC SPACE' for God''s sake, as an atheist... This quantises space and time and explains general relativity at the end, tying my coherent, balanced Standard Model fix together into a well integrated universe TOE model outline... It explains everything is semi-classical terms... it's basically a load of old balls that can collide, vibrate in unison as an electric subspace alternating current and flow in unison as a spinning, strong, magnetic direct current circuit... Simplicity beats complexity. There is much evidence for it. -- Subspace Charge Field: +ve charge cells (quanta, +1) held together by free-flowing -ve charge. Matter-energy field conserves momentum -- Matter-Energy: Matter is focused energy.. Energy is mobile matter.. Momentum conserves velocity.. Force changes velocity and/or direction -- Positron/Up Quark/Graviton (p+): Out of place, free cell warps the field and sends out AC field cell vibration 'blip' spheres at C + 6 spin loops -- Electron/Down Quark (e-): Hole left behind warps the field and sends out AC field cell vibration 'blip' spheres of opposite phase at C + 6 spin loops -- Neutrino/Dark Matter (n+-): Only exactly opposite phase p+ and e- annihilate (ie. pairs created together), else a neutrino forms -- Nucleons: Proton: P = pep.. Neutron: N = Pe = pep,e.. Beta-: e.. Beta+: B = p,n = p,pe.. Alpha: A = PNPN = PeP,PeP = (pep,e,pep)(pep,e,pep) -- Heavier Fermions: Larger holes and chunks of subspace field rapidly disintegrate to p+s, e-s, n+-s and/or annihilate to regular = empty field -- Electrostatic Force: Recoiling blip spheres propagate. Opposite direction + and - blips form a vibrating AC bond, same sign=phase repel -- Instant-Off Long Force: AC (longitudinally blipping) subspace 'flux tube' as thin as 1 cell wide. Each cell and its -ve charge move in contrary motion -- Spin: e-s and p+s pull in the 12 surrounding cells, or -ve charge that pulls cells, that then bounce out, forming 6 loops as a torus. Spins up/down -- Strong Force: Spin loops merge and form flowing DC circuits between e-s and p+s -- Mass: Sum of the lengths of all strong force bonds + near electric field. Neutrino has compact strong force bonds, Protons' are long as 2 p+s repel -- Magnetism: Some spin-aligned atoms' p+s and e-s' strong bonds join in a shorter straight path. Energy conservation results in external force circuits -- Weak Force: Geometric structural charge balance instability. Possibly neutrino hits statistically tipping the balance -- Photon: Charged particle(s) moving up and down (transmitter, atomic electron) form a radiating transverse wave blip pattern -- Double Slit: Laser light / particle centre's preceding, extended subspace distortion diffracts, interferes, forming wave guides observation destroys -- Dark Gravity: p+ traps 1 quantum of -ve charge so void cell size/gap grows (and matter's shrinks?) forming a macro -ve charge gradient -- Bang Expansion: Loss of -ve charge to the multiverse?.. Bang ejector velocity petered out, magnified in time by outward momentum conservation -- Gravity Wave: Longitudinal wave where the entire field in a large region is effected in unison for a duration -- Big Ping: A dark crystal universe collisions' intense gravity wave forms e- & p+ pairs from outside in at C. Many annihilate or form neutrinos -- Big Bang: Ping wave collides centrally? Field blast forms matter + a large hole (then Big/Dark Refill)? Fast -ve charge loss? Neutrino crystal exploded? -- Black Hole: Absorbs matter and energy. Neutrino crystal (with a core returning to empty field)? Large hole in the field traps anything entering? -- Frame Dragging: Entire sphere of subspace cells rotating around a point in unison -- Time: Cell to cell blips take a constant time. Gravity shrinks cells so light slows but locally measures C as circuits lengthen in space & time, adding mass -- Makes more sense than making up bosons to carry force and mass, quarks that don't solve the anti-matter and dark matter problem, anti-neutrinos, loads of fundamental fields, extra spatial and temporal dimensions etc, that ultimately don't tie relativity and quantum mechanics together properly or well... They should at least be honest and call their 'spatial dimensions' geometric/field dimensions or something.. Magic Space is not my cup of tea.

You don't understand quantum mechanics, you get used to it xD

TBH, I thought this was much more understandable than plenty of their other videos, at least from the last couple of years. I don't think I'll ever truly understand the ones about the holographic principle.

You actually can't understand it until you stop watching it. It's called the Quantum Dunno Effect.

Victor O'Neil 😂

@@victoroneil9735 At the exact moment you think you get the answer, your brain wil enter a superposition. Once you try to access the answer it will collapse and your back at the start.

That would be nice!

I wasn’t going ‘thats what i was about to say’.your topic sounded cool :)

Probably something sooner but less imaginative on the Fermilab channel. Plus that has Don Lincoln’s great dad humor.

@Questa Semplice Animazione weird comment, your comment is like correcting someone that says soccer instead of fotball even though they both are correct. So i choose to use the nicer name for that quark...

@Questa Semplice Animazione its very common to use beauty & no one mistakes that for charm...also stop your fixation with claiming that correct names are incorrect, soccer is obviously not wrong. Anyways, this is the most pointless argument i’ve seen in a good while, i think you are a troll that just argues for the sake of arguing, which i’m not interested in since that belongs in kindergarten

and the paradox does not hold for quantum particles because they (and time) are not infinitesimal.

Yes, he had a number of similar paradoxes all leading to the conclusion that motion is impossible / is an illusion

@@drdca8263 yhea I thought it was him. Actually I leant about it in a Terry Pratchett novel where he joins 2 of the paradoxes together by having a philosopher called Xeno having a bet with another about the arrow hitting a Tortoise. So it crossed the Arrow one with the Achilles one, I then looked it up to find out what it really was.

​@@carlosgaspar8447 Zeno: Then you should have no trouble measuring them rather easily and giving me their actual size?

@@nihad6727 www.mathportal.org/calculators/sequences-calculators/geometric-sequences-calculator.php

Yes, it is a NWO Scientific Dictatorship, Science Worship & Praise brainwashing channel populated by a load of dumbed-down, intentionally confused geek-trendies wanting more uber power to Nazti elites to burn our money on useless super-junk... You sheeple would be funny if you weren't such useful idiots!

@@PrivateSi Well that was fun. I hope you make the distinction between the scientific method, argument of authority, and scientific theories because otherwise what you said didn't make any sense.

​ @Oeumuepo Stéphanois .. 'Science' with a capital S... The Scientific Method is the best testing method.. Systems Engineering is the best discipline for system engineering.. Arguments from authority and arguments from UBER-SCIENCE that only a handful really understand are functionally pretty much identical... I like to fight the confusion merchants out there, of the zealous, extremist variety... -- Scitards and Creatards that don't have a clue but pick an extremist side to praise and worship... This is fun, it's a semi-classical TOE outline that explains shed loads on half a side of A4 paper. It sticks to the evidence and the simple premise, with total conservation of energy. Time is left until last but ties general relativity at QM together nicely. -- Bottom-up Thought Experiment... Constraints: As few base forces and particles as possible to form a coherent, integrated 3D multi/universe model -- Subspace Charge Field: +ve charge cells (quanta, +1) held together by free-flowing -ve charge. Matter-energy field conserves momentum -- Matter-Energy: Matter is focused energy.. Energy is mobile matter.. Velocity is position change in time.. Force changes velocity and/or direction -- Positron/Up Quark/Graviton (p+): Out of place, free cell warps the field and sends out field cell vibration 'blip' spheres at C + 6 spin loops -- Electron/Down Quark (e-): Hole left behind warps the field and sends out field cell vibration 'blip' spheres at C + 6 spin loops -- Bion/Electron Neutrino/Dark Matter (n+-): Only exactly opposite phase p+ and e- annihilate (ie. pairs created together), else a Bion is formed -- Nucleons: Proton (P) = pep, Neutron (N) = Pe, Beta- = e, Beta+ (B) = p(n) = p(pe), Alpha (A) = PNPN = (PeP)(PeP) = (pep)(e)(pep)(pep)(e)(pep) -- Heavier Fermions: Larger holes and chunks of subspace field rapidly disintegrate to p+s, e-s, n+-s and/or annihilate to regular = empty field -- Electrostatic Force: Recoiling repulsive blip spheres propagate. Same phase blips repel, opposite form an attracting AC wave guide, recoil adds push -- Spin: e-s and p+s pull in the 12 surrounding cells, or -ve charge that pulls the cells, that then bounce out, forming 6 loops as a torus. Spins up/down -- Strong Force: Spin loops merge and form DC (flowing) circuits between e-s and p+s -- Mass: Length x number of strong force bonds + near electric field. Neutral bion has compact strong force circuits , Protons' are long as 2 p+s repel -- Magnetism: Some spin-aligned atoms' p+s and e-s' strong bonds join in a shorter straight path. Energy conservation results in external force circuits -- Long Instant Off Force: AC (longitudinally blipping) subspace 'flux tube' as thin as 1 cell wide. Each cell and its -ve charge move in contrary motion -- Weak Force: Geometric structural charge balance instability. Possibly statistical hits by bions tipping the balance -- Photon/Light: e- (or p+) moving alternately up and down (ie. transmitter or e- moving from a neutral ground state to charged higher level and back) -- Double Slit: Laser light / particle centre's preceding, extended subspace distortion diffracts, interferes, forming wave guides observation destroys -- Dark Gravity: p+ traps 1 quantum of -ve charge so void cell size/gap grows (and matter's shrinks?) forming a macro -ve charge gradient -- Bang Expansion: Loss of -ve charge to the multiverse?.. Bang ejector velocity petered out, magnified in time by outward momentum conservation -- Gravity Wave: Longitudinal wave where the entire field in a large region is effected in unison for a duration -- Big Ping: A dark crystal universe collisions's intense gravity wave forms e- & p+ pairs from outside in at C. Many annihilate or form bions -- Big Bang: Ping wave collides centrally / -ve charge lost to the multiverse / blasted cells and -ve charge form much matter and leave a truly empty hole? -- Black Hole: Absorbs matter and energy. Bion crystal? Truly empty hole in the field that rips matter to pieces, turning it into subspace field until full? -- Frame Dragging: Entire sphere of subspace cells rotating around a point in unison -- Time: Cell to cell blips take a constant time so light slows locally with gravity as cells shrink but always measures C locally as subspace circuits slow too-- -- Makes more sense than making up bosons to carry force and mass, quarks that don't solve the anti-matter and dark matter problem, anti-neutrinos, loads of fundamental fields, extra spatial and temporal dimensions etc, that ultimately don't tie relativity and quantum mechanics together properly or well... They should at least be honest and call their 'spatial dimensions' geometric/field dimensions or something.. Magic Space is not my cup of tea.

@@Felishamois nothing this person will make any sense. they just cut/copy/paste mumbo jumbo, they said it themselves above.

I do it routinely, as I always see people being confused about it... Every observation is an interaction, but not every interaction is observation. And wave function collapse happens at interaction, not at observation.

You'll never sound mystifying with an attitude like that!

You guys been living under a rock or what. The whole concept of quantum physics is based on the changes in the states of sub atomic particles caused by "Human Consciousness". Quantum physicists try to have observations with zero interaction. This act of observation without interaction is what makes the results "Mystical" or otherwise it simply would be "scientifical".

Yeah, really not helping the impression people have that "observation" means "human looking at it" with those visuals either

@@davidabdollahi7906 That’s the exact misconception which comes from misusing these words. You misunderstood the whole concept. The whole point is that observation without interaction is IMPOSSIBLE, so we can NEVER observe a quantum particle without changing it. Consciousness is not even mentioned by physicists, it is coming from people who don’t understand.

Ahaha...that's definitely Giorgio A. Tsoukalos from Ancient Aliens. Nice to see him branching out.

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

Or inversely the matrix is buffering with quantum effects

Ha ha ha..... very well said. We can never see "true live cast".

Lmao

Well, perhaps the laws of physics cease to exist on your stove. -- Vinny Gambini

It's not really trolling. The Zeno paradox may have been "solved" mathematically but physically speaking, we still have quantum fields and still don't know what time is.

@JohnR2319881222 Imagine hundreds of years later, our descendants might use that quote to describe how mysterious quantum mechanics is to their ancestors, just to highlight how much humanity's understanding of physics have advanced.

Yes true, the Motion-Time is continues you cannot divide them

Funny there is no impact on the object by the start-stop action of the Planck length travel.

@Parker Sullins Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

@Parker Sullins Yes true, the Motion-Time is continues you cannot divide them.

I thought Planck length was the smallest size a particle could be, but that particle is supposed to be able to move through infinitely divisible space?

@@wormalism The planck length covers both size and distance

They call it 'quantum locking' in the show, but same diff.

I was just about to say the same thing 😁👍

@@Vasharan i must quantum lock my house because i can never remember whether i did, concluding i both did and didnt, but to a reasonable probability like 95%

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

Wow, I actually took a course in mathematics on Wondrium, formerly the great courses, by Professor Bruce Edwards where he explained this version of Zeno's paradox . You are absolutely correct. 🏆

Whats the difference between that and being dead? You aren't aware either way.

@@Pyxis10 Because iWould be able to use a simple timing system to stop observing my quantum processes at a certain time or after a certain amount of time. Or if it ever stopped working or had power shut off, iWould hope to return to the mobility of the unobserved, XD

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

They're insecure, stagefreight.

Same, been here for years, don't understand even 10% of what he says but i like his voice...

I am sure in some alternate reality, you do understand. This is called “Many Worlds Interpretation”.

The fact that I can't argue about anything here or hold any opinions due to my nonexistent knowledge in this field is very calming and feels like magic.

@@ggiorgib Also a very good way to let the universe humble you a fair bit every once in a while.

there are plenty of working physics PhD who have only 'wtf' to say about the (anti)quantum Zeno effect.

It might... or it might also make them degrade faster. But basically, yes bombarding the element in a perfectly synchronized barrage of particles could in theory keep them from "degrading", though it might not be actually doing that, but instead refreshing it.

Is Dr Who big where you live?

Iirc the Weeping Angel's had something to do with quantum mechanics. Ya they could Quantum-lock. Also fun how they used Weeping angel reference in video

Súper Mario Ghosts. (Boos / Teresa) As long as you’re looking at them they don’t move.

or the ghost from super mario

@ *steve* Thanks for confirming what I said above.

But then you have to really be observant while punching, because if you miss, you can't freeze the initial state and the wave function collapses to the final state of you getting hit! So, observation is must! Both while just observing or even punching.

@@viveklakshman2897 Ah! Now you've discovered the violence inherent in the system! (The punching and box-putting *is* the observing.)

Try also: -Veritasium. -Its ok to be smart. -Neil Red. -Sci Man Dan. -Sci Show. -Practical Engineering. -Hbomberguy!!

@@slevinchannel7589 If you could somehow perfectly synchronize energy pulses on every particle of a cat to perfectly reset its state, yes. It's way more likely you'd give said cat cancer though.

@@sinteleonwhats up with the science world and murdering cats

He trolled once an archer who tried to shoot an arrow at him.

I take that as a hint that this whole episode is an example of Quantum Trolling.

So my Roku box, computer and TV are now all angels?

No, for stimulated emission the electrons have to be in the right state to begin with.

@@danieljensen2626 what is the difference? You are forcing the transition between two states by interaction with a photon. You can see the original situation as a superposition of the highest and lowest state with a big weight on the highest. The photon transfers the weight on the lowest effectively forcing the transition.

XD

Maybe a perfectly harmless arrow lodged in you, since there probably is a post impact frame.

no. there's many ways to observe things. too many. also, partial observations and partial collapse are a thing.

@@stephenkamenar Theres no way to observe a particle without affecting it, whether by letting it collide into an object, or shooting it with some other particle. if you're not doing that you can't tell what the particle's doing at all.

Hit it with something, doesn't have to be an identical arrow.

Not really, no. These phenomena manifest with particle types that have non-zero rest mass as well, such as electrons and protons. The differing inertial values between the terminals of your experiment's observational instrumentation will curve each respective wave-state accordingly, but each quantum-probabilistic determination will nonetheless converge to a single tight beam approximating an infinitely thin ray as the isotropic wave-state collapses into an anisotropic configuration of the quantized system, as usual. Rather, what's happening in this "Quantum Arrow" metaphor is that since these particle types are by their very essence symmetrical in a standing-wave configuration as depicted in the video, and due to the apparent conservation of angular momentum in the universe in general, there just isn't any geometrical form by which you can hold a magnifying glass that doesn't consequently by virtue of its focusing lens cast a conjugate shadow across the exact set of possible coordinates that the Quantum Arrow's entangled pair could ever exist in; remember that it entangled pairs can't just be anywhere in the universe, or else they wouldn't be entangled; they would just be quasi-random, isolated events. All of this so-called "weirdness" of quantum mechanics simply melts away if you just realize that the observer effect occurs at the position of your subjective instrumentation, not "the universe." We don't have magnifying glasses that show us the universe, we have magnifying glasses that show us what's happening on the surface of the magnifying glass. That's pretty much the central theme of scientific determinism, isn't it? I don't think that's unusual in the slightest that instruments which focus light simultaneously cast shadows in a conjugate relationship. I guess whatever gets you excited is what you gets excited though. If pretending that QM is magic helps you rationalize physics, then more power to ya'. Personally, I think that thinking of things that happen normally as if they were normal things happening is less confusing than the alternative. :^)

Not necessarily an arrow, but yeah, you have to hit it with something to measure where it is.

spacetimey-whimey stuff

Wibbily-wobbily

YES! I've been obsessed with this for over a year! I was lacking some of the vocabulary, so thank you for helping me!

Nerd.

If we could manipulate quantum mechanics I think the force could become very real

@@blahblahgdp how so?

@@blahblahgdp can you plz tell in detail

@@-Blue-_ he has the full proof, but its too long to write here. its simple really, trust him on this one 🥴

@@pokeman123451 really bro ?? I am serious brother 😥😥😥

He was demonstrating the yet unnamed "Picard maneuver".