There is more gravity force weight pushing the object down than down the slope, it is easier to fall down and roll for that object.

Not everything is diamagnetic, there are some materials that are paramagnetic, like Oxygen for example.

You could have just put a pipe in the klein bottle and filled the bottle Or you could have just used pressurised water and force it throough the first opening

This was me when i found the black light

I use Nitric, Sulphuric, hydrochloric, Chromic and many other chemicals daily.

It gave up because it came from an Altima

Chat GPT is dumb imo. Not impressed. It's also extremely biased which is dangerous, even by it's own definiton.

Apparently my 3 boys and I are having a laser war. Don't worry we will watch our eyes Karen.

Using 2 different layouts to represent the experiment made this really hard to answer. In your first layout you indicated a point on the horizontal section, but with the pressure gage you tested it in a vertical position. I recognize the answer is the same in both scenarios, but the layout skewed my initial interpretation.

lol, imagine firefighters playing some funky music at max volume as a way to put out a house fire. That would have been awesome.

the best way to store photons is redirect it into a black hole

Если бежать достаточно быстро вокруг дома, то есть вероятность увидеть свою жопу!

I don't want a stupid wallet!!! I want to know where I can buy one of those laser kits to do the experiment!!!

or you could just embrace the latest soviet military tech from the 1970's and their supercavitating Shkval torpedo that shot steam out of its nose, and used a rocket motor to propel its nuclear warhead to a speed of 400km/hr underwater

Your weight is exactly the same whether you’re standing on the ground or a bathroom scale. But now imagine pushing up on the ceiling while weighing yourself.

It's really fascinating

I think I see it but it's like 3 millimeters large and extremely faint. How is the visibility affected by the quality of the LCD's backlight?

It didnt feel like a paradox to me. Kinda obvious to take the fixed wire into account. Great how you dissected it thought! To the question of the field moving or not: What about the initial experiment in which you moved the cube magnet over the wire? If the field of a symmetric magnet like the disc isnt moving, then the field of a moving symmetric cube shouldn‘t be moving, right? But then we wouldn‘t see a current in that initial experiment. As a consequence, the field must move with the wire. I‘m feeling I‘m missing an important point here - it can‘t be that simple 😂. So please help me out!

😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅

He looks so gangsta with that Nerf gun

I think you confused the Columbus story with the story of Brunelleschi. He made that trick with an egg when others were critisizing him because of his plan of building the dome for the florence cathedral

What about,,,,, cheese... Am I eating diamagnetic cheese?

I had to watch this because I have never been satisfied with the explanations. It is a mystery, and we are missing something. When I was a kid, I accepted the radiation pressure idea but didn't know it rotated the opposite direction as expected. I have that same radiometer and have tested it with a violet laser myself and am comfortable saying the black side directly heats the low-pressure air inside increasing the velocity of motion pushing on the vanes. Thermal transfer is over thinking it and is not the driving force. The vanes are bent and crooked from shipping challenges, but it whips around rapidly when the sun hits it.

We got see water cutting before gta 6

That's remarkable. I didn't know that. I love action lab so so much!

In the diagram at 0:06 it is not a sealed unit both the A and B show sealed on the right and not sealed on the taller part. Again at 3:19 your L shapes are not sealed on the left side. I know you say sealed but the static model does not show what you say. sealed systems work very differently from those with an opening.

Mirrors in the feature are the most powerful shields ever

Eh was going to comment that the pressure would increase because the weight of the water would be able to compress the air while the bubble is at the bottom which would reduce the pressure, while at the top the air would be have no water ontop making it less compressed, but then I was like Na because it's a sealed container so the water couldn't compress the air without changing the volume, so basically I was right the first time... Damn it.

Man, ChatGPT is garbage these days. This is from the recent Llama3 8b-instruct-q6k model (a little 8-billion parameter model, mind you): Q: Is heterological heterological or autological? A: A clever question! The term "heterological" is actually a bit of a paradox. In general, "hetero-" means "other" or "different", and "-logical" refers to logic or the study of reasoning. However, when we use the term "heterological" in philosophy, particularly in the context of Gottlob Frege's work on meaning and reference, it has a specific technical sense. In this sense, "heterological" means something that is not self-referential, i.e., something that does not apply to itself. So, when we ask whether "heterological" is heterological or autological (i.e., self-referential), we are essentially asking whether the term "heterological" refers to itself as non-self-referential. Frege himself argued that "heterological" is indeed autological, because it does refer to itself. In other words, when we say that a term is heterological, we mean that it doesn't apply to itself; but if we apply the term "heterological" to itself, we are saying that it doesn't refer to itself as non-self-referential. This would make it self-referential, and thus autological. On the other hand, some philosophers have argued that "heterological" is indeed heterological, because when we apply it to itself, we are essentially saying that it refers to something else (namely, a term that is not self-referential), rather than referring to itself. This would make "heterological" heterological. In conclusion, the answer depends on one's interpretation of what it means for a term to be autological or heterological. If we follow Frege's lead, then "heterological" is indeed autological. But if we take a more nuanced view, we might argue that it is heterological after all!

Hey hey Howard wolowitz made that 19 million toilet

In a given subject, an individual's expertise should be measured by their ability to communicate it easily, simply, and clearly. Regardless of the theory we teach, without imparting this skill, understanding remains elusive. I applaud this sentiment and the type of explanation.

Its a Real life Minecraft Square Water Physics: /Jumps it on and u wont die.

Mirrors are wicked technology the stuff they make mirrors with are bad for your brain remember we are not supposed to use mirrors

Your finger is mostly water..

Is the mouse diamagnetic or the plastic cup that it’s contained in?

Tip to see it: completely darken your room and slowly tilt your head 90° from side to side while looking at the screen

Just admit that daddy einestine was wrong

Slime umbrella

recipe to make quantum tunneling at home 😆

I got an idea, Normal umbrella

So basically, the delivery man just isn't throwing the packages hard enough, or else they would land as softly as he intended🙃

I have a legit question, will it move a dead mouse?

I saw 2 brushes yellow and bluish : left and right - eerie feeling

He’s testing with live animals now can’t wait for some crazzzy shi

I was thinking 'how is this guy going to go faster than the speed of sound in a car' 😂😂😂

would you consider taking out the background music?

No coins were harmed in the making of this video

He just created the World first Bass-fueled Vortex Minigun!

Oh, sure, let me just grab my polarizer....

why is the speed of light so slow