The era of nuclear precision has begun
6:07
NASA named an asteroid after me
7:18
7 годин тому
How does gravity escape a black hole?
6:24
Why flat earthers scare me
8:05
14 годин тому
Modified Gravity Strikes Back
8:24
21 день тому
Warp Drives: New Simulations
6:40
21 день тому
How Noise Improves Computing
10:57
21 день тому
Charging while Driving: Does it Work?
6:57
New XPRIZE for Quantum Computing
6:41
Climate Change Makes Days Longer
6:04
Місяць тому
Let Wildfires Burn, Scientists Say
7:06
КОМЕНТАРІ
@dennisligma4958
@dennisligma4958 49 секунд тому
Yes?
@MickEMaus3000
@MickEMaus3000 2 хвилини тому
I think part of the problem is that science is withheld from the general population. You have to pay to read papers. You have to pay to use Brilliant. New ideas are worth money so corporations, universities, and web sites keep those ideas behind a paywall. Another problem could be that disruptive ideas challenge those in power who have been promoting the status quo for most of their careers. Peer reviewed journals are the gatekeepers of information and publishing in them is required for a degree. The people reviewing papers do not want to be shown to be wrong. Funding goes to those who follow the current thinking. I think climate science is a poster child for this problem. No crisis means no funding, no papers and no degree. So those pursuing a degree in climate science toe the line and publish to support the current thinking. They fill the offices of universities and go on to regulate thought. Those who don't do that find another line of work. Part of the problem could be a completely wrong world view. For instance, if your world view requires 90% of matter to be "dark" to reconcile observations with what you believe to be true, it may be time to start considering other possibilities.
@robertdiehl1281
@robertdiehl1281 2 хвилини тому
Einstein would understand her position of wanting to keep their private lives…private.
@wilfredotour3
@wilfredotour3 3 хвилини тому
Everything that requires education is declining. Education costs money and time. Many Einsteins will be able to pay for it. Many Einsteins won’t. But nobody is looking for an Einstein. They’re just selling the position.
@fueledbycoffee583
@fueledbycoffee583 3 хвилини тому
I once tried to date a girl that is a flat earther. I was talking to her about my job (i am in software dev and was overseen a small telecom project) and when i started to explain to her how we used satelites as fallback and so on... The face of hatred she made. She though i was part of some government conspiracy and i was being paid to lie about sateliets or i was being lied to. instead of school her, i just agreed with her as much as possible, paid for dinner and never spoke with her again
@0909umcia
@0909umcia 4 хвилини тому
First time did I hear she was Jewish.
@JohnPretty1
@JohnPretty1 5 хвилин тому
Too much conceit. Sabine, physicists have been trying to formulare a "grand unified theory" for 100 years now. Has it never occurred to any of them that maybe their thinking is wrong? And they don't even properly define the term "universe".
@mintonmiller
@mintonmiller 6 хвилин тому
Research and Development has little to do with groundbreaking discovery. R&D is all about short term monetizing of already known science.
@DanielL-ee7fe
@DanielL-ee7fe 6 хвилин тому
A new study can find any thing as long as you pay for it. Why don't you use some tangible data. For example, is the total world food production declining? It's a well surveyed data. If not, it means the climate is so far so good.
@Nostrudoomus
@Nostrudoomus 8 хвилин тому
What is it with Physicists and their torrid love 💕 affairs 😮 at this time in history, there must be something unspoken that is really SEXY about stories of trains and elevators going by with mirrors 🪞 reflecting light and risking your life with radioisotope experimentation? Or was it just typical war time behavior? Funny, General Patton was nearly killed by a horse cart that broke loose at the end of the war! 😢
@Nostrudoomus
@Nostrudoomus 9 хвилин тому
Ohhh I get it, these things take me a while sometimes! The PS was really Einstein telling Curie he wanted to take her out for PIZZA 🍕 and get a little WHOOPY afterwards! 😅 (“Reptile fabricated” that’s pizza 🍕 of course, and we all know what the “law of motion” really means and a woman’s Planck radiation field, that’s a place where nuclear explosions occur! She must have been really turned on by his dirty talk!😊)
@terrywallace5181
@terrywallace5181 10 хвилин тому
Why not try for lukewarm fusion?
@peterhewitt1662
@peterhewitt1662 13 хвилин тому
Thanks
@Akumetsu02
@Akumetsu02 14 хвилин тому
I guess he is under a lot of pressure now,... but maybe he will improve his conduct. If not... increase pressure.
@vicceszoli
@vicceszoli 14 хвилин тому
Yes, when scientists are subjugated to LGBTQ propaganda, science is dying. Btw., how can I get rid of your videos? I have already unsubscribed from your channel. 🙂
@miloszforman6270
@miloszforman6270 14 хвилин тому
Die Dame ist doch Physikerin. Wie kommt es, dass sie sich so gut auskennt mit Covid, und vor allem mit den Regierungsvorgaben? Wenn jemand blind der Regierung hinterherläuft, dann kann man den auch in seinem Fachgebiet nicht mehr ernstnehmen.
@Depeche133
@Depeche133 15 хвилин тому
BULLSHIT!!
@jujjuj7676
@jujjuj7676 16 хвилин тому
I can answer that, its called TRUMP...😮
@user-sw8vb2qo8y
@user-sw8vb2qo8y 14 хвилин тому
Trump is hardly the woke spirit behind forcing lies down our throats.
@gambit633
@gambit633 16 хвилин тому
I thought AI would evetnually save us. Catapult us forward inknowledge. However the current Chat AI weaseled out and dodged my question "As of now, I cannot provide you with a scientific fact that no human knows, as by definition, if I were to know it, then at least one human would also know it."
@wetodd3879
@wetodd3879 16 хвилин тому
I don't fully accept the "branching" as you've put it. Another universe isn't created from the branching. It's just already there but with a different deterministic path, and since the idea is there could be infinite then there will/would be some very much like ours where a lot of things can run parallel in position, time, and state where one small difference may alter the path. And again, another difference would return them back to parallel for a time.
@ArdentLion
@ArdentLion 17 хвилин тому
DEI
@revcrussell
@revcrussell 18 хвилин тому
Dr. Ed Dutton has a UKposts channel on all of this. The root causes are unpalatable to address.
@user-sw8vb2qo8y
@user-sw8vb2qo8y 18 хвилин тому
From my lame person perspective, I'd say the science went woke and this is the result. If we can't question scientific theories, like in the Covid era, it means that we are not dealing with science but rather with a new religion.
@YERAFirearms
@YERAFirearms 19 хвилин тому
100% correct. You are not alone. It is the same story everywhere.
@frrankdesilva6504
@frrankdesilva6504 19 хвилин тому
A description of consciousness leads to a contradiction with the postulation from special relativity that there can be no connections between simultaneous event. This contradiction points to consciousness involving quantum level mechanisms. The Quantum level description of the universe is re- evaluated in the light of what is observed in consciousness namely 4 Dimensional objects. A new improved interpretation of Quantum level observations is introduced. From this vantage point the following axioms of consciousness is presented. Consciousness consists of two distinct components, the observed U and the observer I. The observed U consist of all the events I is aware of. A vast majority of these occur simultaneously. Now if I were to be an entity within the space-time continuum, all of these events of U together with I would have to occur at one point in space-time. However, U is distributed over a definite region of space-time (region in brain). Thus, I is aware of a multitude of space-like separated events. It is seen that this awareness necessitates I to be an entity outside the space-time continuum. With I taken as such, a new concept called concept A is introduced. With the help of concept A a very important axiom of consciousness, namely Free Will is explained. philpapers.org/rec/DESCAS www.academia.edu/99424309/Events_to_Dualism
@verynice5574
@verynice5574 21 хвилина тому
Peter Thiel has been talking about this for a couple decades from the perspective of economics and incentives.
@feraudyh
@feraudyh 21 хвилина тому
Is it "rebel" (as pronounced and transcribed) or rabble?
@ShamanKish
@ShamanKish 23 хвилини тому
No, it has moved to China.
@Classical741
@Classical741 23 хвилини тому
I'm afraid this one left me totally confused. Blame my little grey cells, but a shorter version without quite so much terminology would be helpful. I love your content, and the first half of this was fascinating!
@RLS1010w-wh
@RLS1010w-wh 24 хвилини тому
SCHADE!😢 Das ihre Sendungen nur in Englisch gemacht werden! Ich glaube ich bin in Österreich und Deutschland in guter Gesellschaft mit vielen Menschen deren Englischkenntnisse nicht ausreichen um allen ihren sehr interessanten und komplexen Aussagen wirklich folgen zu können! Schade! Liebe Grüße aus Vienna 🥂🇦🇹
@TroyIII
@TroyIII 24 хвилини тому
1. by accelerating the 9.81ms every next one, so that the acceleration part of the trip would feel comfortable as if you never left the earth. 2. what makes you think that entropy is in any way related to time e.g.: our counting of how many times some periodical event occurs before we start owver? 3. self-explanatory. 4. it's just numbers. 5. they are quantities.
@Nostrudoomus
@Nostrudoomus 25 хвилин тому
Who told Einstein it was OK 👍🏻 to insert his statistical law motion into Planck’s radiation ☢️ field without first getting permission from the diatomic molecule?😮
@Skeptic_
@Skeptic_ 26 хвилин тому
Thanks!
@mytubehkjt
@mytubehkjt 26 хвилин тому
Safe and effective.
@rogeliocamacho8548
@rogeliocamacho8548 28 хвилин тому
La teleología del universo es una necedad.
@marc-andrepiche1809
@marc-andrepiche1809 28 хвилин тому
I'm seriously addicted to cookies. Like ... seriously 😅
@AG-ge4us
@AG-ge4us 28 хвилин тому
Sabine, pls make a video about increasing mistakes in math papers
@rogeliocamacho8548
@rogeliocamacho8548 29 хвилин тому
Hay algunas ideas para los pezones masculinos.
@ThatEvilGnome
@ThatEvilGnome 29 хвилин тому
Well earned.
@franksullivan1873
@franksullivan1873 31 хвилина тому
It’s no longer about a calling to improve life for all of humanity,it is about keeping secrets,money and power for the few.
@bethbovey7566
@bethbovey7566 31 хвилина тому
Thank you, I am currently keeping a food diary to try to pinpoint the cause of my issues. Your video helps heaps.
@ShonMardani
@ShonMardani 32 хвилини тому
I hope one day Sabine will talk about one thing that she can agree with on the record, as the result of what she learned in physics so far.
@amedeo909
@amedeo909 33 хвилини тому
Because of progressivism. If definitions are shifting, or data that's goes against the progressive hegemony is suppressed because it's " problematic " there is no progress. Russia still uses vavvume tubes
@jimalbi
@jimalbi 34 хвилини тому
I have one more for you: The Moon is getting farther from Earth every year. We happen to live as a species at the moment in Earth's history where the apparent size of the Moon fits mostly with the apparent size of the Sun, allowing total eclipses.
@technolus5742
@technolus5742 34 хвилини тому
Einstein himself was also adept of frolicking around
@hamishmuirhead9917
@hamishmuirhead9917 36 хвилин тому
With brass band accompaniment: Mary Jane is a man, is a man! On 't interweb webroom chat. Mary Jane is a man, is a man! Didst tha not ken tha', tha daft twat? On 't interweb net chat! On 't interweb net chat! On 't interweb net chat!
@jeffreywolfe1122
@jeffreywolfe1122 37 хвилин тому
I’m always curious if carbon dioxide proceeds temperature change or follows temperature change?
@stargazer7644
@stargazer7644 37 хвилин тому
And then she never posted another music video ever again.
@carlbrenninkmeijer8925
@carlbrenninkmeijer8925 38 хвилин тому
It is good that Einstein helped. He was a concerned person.