The thoughts doing through of classic briefs study and Federalist Papers' basics.

So basically almost everytime an evolutionary gene or advantage developing it will either be seen as a “mutation/defect” and be at risk of attempts to prevent its development by the majority of the species that can’t comprehend becoming obsolete and wont except the inevitable. Or it will burst into existence in a percentage of a species fast enough to ensure that the comprehension of what’s really happening spreads fast enough to overpower the attempts to delay it long enough to figure out a way to have control over the advantage.

❤

1L student here, preparing my brief and saying thank you for your video...lol

Let's refer to the modern death penalty, “1976”.. Very next segment, Slavery and the south..

Germans were the victims. Look up a documentary called Hellstorm

Then what should happen when the subject judge, out of defiance and spite, ignores the obvious facts and refuses to recuse themselves?

its all greek to me

Good Understanding in his lectures ALWAYS Thank You Sir .

How is the second one a paradox. There is no preference, it is simply a tie. There is no repeat of any candidate in the first, second, or even third column. 3 voters voting for 3 candidates, which means it does not matter what candidate is more preferred against one other candidate if you were voting for just those two against each other. It is a vote for 3 candidates between 3 voters and it just so happened that nobody agreed on a first, second, or third candidate. It would simply be a tie. End of story. No need to complicate things that don’t need to be complicated. In a normal society somebody is bound to agree, there are more than 3 voters, and there are even more than 3 candidates. So, this would NEVER EVEN HAPPEN in todays world. This could also happen with 4 and 4 and many other numbers.

mocne

Great video - needs gender bias

This professor is amazing! I'm study classical music in this Channel and I'm so grateful for it! God bless this such amazing teacher❤❤❤ greetings from Brazil🇧🇷

Amazing that someone at Yale, and Yale itself, would put out for public consumption a presentation in which the presenter simply reads, verbatim, the Power Point slides and calls it a day -- for God's sake. Learn how to do a presentation using Power Point appropriately -- bullet points. Your audience can read the same as you can. You want to bore them and lose them, do this kind of thing. I'd think at a community college a professor would know better. Learn how to engage, to teach, to impart the importance of what you teach. So much is wrong about this.

This is sickening to hear

Clearly doesn't know what he is talking about

Nothing written on the screen says anything about perjury

Ex-ante versus Ex-post analyses. Juries think from an ex-post analysis. More likely to have mercy since the problem has already happened. Judges think more from the ex-post analysis because they have to consider the decision's effects toward the future, that is, with respect to future instances of the same type of event (prospective disputes). Legislators and regulators naturally apply prospective rules so they will apply ex ante perspectives for the most part but can also take into account ex post factors such as fiscal burdens or social effects of mass incarceration. Legal system uses a mixed ex ante and ex post system.

Normative debates relate to what the law should be. Positive discussions relate to what IS the law. Holmes: life of the law has been experience, not the syllogism. Discussion about the is/ought fallacy and Hume's law. Important to state normative implications of your positions. For example, "efficiently minded jurists" would prefer X over Y. Thinking about normative, positive dichotomy helps uncover what lies beneath someone's interest in studying a particular phenomenon.

One distinction that is useful to keep in mind is that between rules and standards. Rules provide clear guidelines and a specific bar (such as 40 MPH). Standards are fuzzier (such as reasonable care) and provide less predictability because they are subject to broad interpretation by courts or other authorities. They can be used in conjunction and they are used as a continuum not as a dichotomy. Example: rules or standards for price setting (reasonable price) versus quantity (0). Useful tool to analyze and critique cases. When should we prefer one over the other?

Introduction to basic analytical tools needed to excel in law school with an emphasis on economics. Useful for a head start before starting 1L ( which is my case). The tools allow you to understand the structure of legal rules and of legal arguments. Bonus tip: visit the library and know how to get around.

Black panthers were some of the known usuarists of vices/torture devices...plauging hebrews jews christians and travellers...universal warfare is coming and may already be here...

Any case law for above mentioned subject

Voting is a right because everyone else has a duty not to interfere with my right to vote.

4:57

Trump's judge is clearly bias

I am Yale school law thank you for a video UKposts

Very interesting. Who is the professor?

How you can be so good in your teaching, dear professor! Every statement is filled with years of wisdom. Thank you for these lectures. A huge admirer of your work.

Anyone knows how the picture showed in 7:16 was drawed?

How can Judges be impartial in UK when Barristers and Judges have llink to their Chambers and Freemasonry? So appeal system does not work as they all practice nepotism!!

Important to note that in reference to the “latino” community, it’s mostly the black and indigenous population who are affected, not so much the white hispanic people. Though they can also face prejudice and discrimination solely based on their written names. But that goes back to many people of colour having Spanish names after colonialization.

The judge just ordered me to have no contact wjth my child after I called an emergency hearing when my son said he was suicidal . His father said I was telling our son to do it and the judge made her ruling without a hearing and said I'm the undermining the fathers ability to parent... even tho my son is scared and traumatized and was forced to live with him. She is biased against me and won't even hear my evidence. The father never presents evidence. I'm lost in what I can do and I fear for my sons safety.

She neglects to mention the victims rights advocates who opposed her and her decisions on some disgusting cases. According to Journey Into Darkness, the “People to Retain Penny White” campaign “raised more than ten times as much money as the anti-White group” - she sounds like a complete liar. Thank God she is not a judge anymore.

I had a neighbour who was a shrink. He screamed the house down at his supposedly autistic son. The rest of the time the boy was left alone, to count his coins or to enter neighbours houses & ask for coins. It does make a huge difference how a person is treated or ignored/neglected.

This was incredibly useful, I am a lawschool student from Chile, but for an strange reason Hohfeld´s theory made more sense in english. Anyways, thanks for the help proffessor :)

I thought intelligent design was responsible for cancer in children and selecting some Ashkenazi folks to avoid malaria.

subtítulos en español por favor! 😟

So we lost 90+ years of research and progress on Phage therapy because Big Pharma blocked it in favor of $$$ antibiotics... Thank you for pointing that out..

This place is breezy. We need to fix that.

Alarmist propaganda is yale

Thank you!

Came here after watching the Mandela Effect, and was wondering if since (i think) schizophrenics are people that have trouble staying grounded to reality, and possibly have “multiple reality disorder”, and that they bounce around between what’s really happening and shift into different realities they also fully believe in. Shifting between worlds or timelines in their head one may say. What this would mean is that it is plausible autistic people would be MORE rooted into certain realities, meaning possibly major and unexpected change in environment disturbs them, (loud noises, a dramatic fight between parents) but what about the need to complete tasks? And their repetitive nature? Well, aren’t they narrowing the scope of their environment? They like things organized, consistent, and whole. Including their reality. The best way to achieve this desire is using patterns (ie using sets of 3). In the end, wouldn’t all of these things root them more firmly into a certain way of thinking, a certain pattern, and therefore a concrete and singular reality? I would think Schizophrenic people people have the opposite tendencies that’s why so many homeless people are schizophrenic and why the Middle East which has much higher rates of autism developed a strict, firm, simple, and honest religion?

thanks!

thanks!

Absolutely Rickey Ray Rector deserved what he got and more hope the devil is eating hes eyes out everyday, Capital Punishment or death penalty should be employed to those that commit heinous crimes

Spells don't work unless spoken precisely. Hogwarts Legacy. 🪄

What happens if you’re diagnosed with both 😅

and how does Natural selection provide an answer for 8 billion people, set to reach 9 and beyond by 2032.

Science is not random and technology is not ruled by chance. Only the myth of evolution is.