They never made it past the radiation belts. The technology was not there to complete those missions. We can point telescopes back into the past 13 billion years into the beginning of the universe, why can’t we point them at the moon exactly where the Apollo missions landed and show us the tracks, the gear the flags the landing sites. Wonder why well likely because it never happened. They don’t have the technology to do it now and they didn’t have it in 1969.
@hansrajbissessar90986 годин тому
I love what you do, get smarter every day 🙂.
@terryrogers62327 годин тому
I was a student in Poughkeepsie getting access to his cast off modules, SLD/SLT. Still remember how to make elementary CPUs and things like bit slice CPU with just a bit more integration. Fun. So I knew of what he was speaking.
@jwkayk36014 годин тому
Amazing. Also would love an update on that custom truck project
@dallasmed65День тому
I just inherited a trunk full of old cameras and recorders from the 40’s. My great uncle was a journalist in WW2 and nobody in my family wanted them because they didn’t understand them. I’m glad I got my hands on them so I can use them myself and send them to people like this who can fix them up. Truly amazing pieces of machinery.
@Fowlos09День тому
I'm sure it's partly a language barrier type of thing but Finns are almost alien in their communication, they are so literal lol. Destin: "can i buy a camera door from you guys? "oh no I don't sell that's someone else, I just check cameras" 🤣 love it
@lilhawkjayДень тому
Love your videos on everything, very interesting and educational. Ty
@lilhawkjayДень тому
I'm one of those truckers who haul these to farmers.
@VictorHQuirozCastroДень тому
I've bought two cameras from them. Both absolutely perfect cameras, I love them. Also, film photography is so much fun, there's something magical when receiving back the developed film negatives.
@billmadison20322 дні тому
could you try to tamp the match against the bullet to see what would happen?
@lucashinch2 дні тому
I wish people would do this more with electronic and HiFi.
@Earl_Poole3 дні тому
I still use a Canon T90, so this hit home. Destin is easily one of the best content creators on YT.
@user-ng8mc1hd8i4 дні тому
Randal sent me
@codymoe49864 дні тому
36:07 "We'll get out of your hair, and let you go shoot some rockets." Sick burn, Destin...
@cheeseisgreat244 дні тому
When they were talking about the economics of this technique, I couldn’t help but feel like this technology is actually deceptively far more scalable than stamping, because an increase in throughput for a production run just needs more robot arms, your tools to manipulate the steel are relatively the same, and to increase capacity on any single production run, you just need that code handling the arms to run on more of them, and almost all arms can run all of your company’s products at any time. To increase throughput on stamping you need multiples of the same die, so while the stamping process in and of itself is much faster, you can retool for a different production run or make modifications to a production run in a much shorter time in situ as well as spin up or spin down the number of arms involved in production on the fly, which you cannot do with stamping if you only have one die.
@justjoe73134 дні тому
Another VERY interesting video!
@justjoe73134 дні тому
Love Brandon's accent at 8:30 Such diversity is golden!
@InPropheticTimes5 днів тому
46:02 "After that the crew was to separate from the Stage-4 booster and do their magic"... I think that's the only fitting answer on how to explain a tiny rocket propelled spacecraft/LM with ZERO boosters left has enough propulsion (from where?) to go 246,000 additional miles to get to the moon, stay in lunar orbit 21 hours and return back another 248,000 miles to Earth. In fact, even with today's technology this would be considered an impossible feat, requiring multiple booster rockets (12 or more, per Artemis specs) just to go there one-way. I don't understand how seemingly intelligent people like Destin or Luke have enough cognitive dissonance to refuse to except the facts at hand. Yes, they made extraordinary progress just to get humans into orbit using outdated rocket technology (which will be useless in SPACE outside an gaseous atmosphere) but how can you ignore the facts that the entirety of the boosters could barely get you into LEO, which is a stationary orbit unless you were to refuel and load up more boosters there... which was the original plan NASA had when they were going for REAL. In fact this is the challenge, which they face today... and the reason NOBODY has been able to have a manned flight back to the moon.
@maxfan15912 дні тому
""After that the crew was to separate from the Stage-4 booster and do their magic"... I think that's the only fitting answer on how to explain a tiny rocket propelled spacecraft/LM with ZERO boosters left has enough propulsion (from where?) to go 246,000 additional miles to get to the moon, stay in lunar orbit 21 hours and return back another 248,000 miles to Earth." Just to be clear, the third stage provided the thrust to accelerate the stack out of earth orbit towards the moon. Six minutes of acceleration was sufficient to allow the command and service module (and the lunar module) to coast to the moon in three days. Once in orbit around the moon, the engine in the service module was sufficient to accelerate the command and service module out of lunar orbit and on a path back to the earth. This is because the moon has much less mass than the earth, meaning its gravity is much less, meaning less force is required to achieve the required acceleration. "In fact, even with today's technology this would be considered an impossible feat, requiring multiple booster rockets (12 or more, per Artemis specs) just to go there one-way." Sorry, but you're mistaking two separate issues. The Artemis 1 spacecraft was accelerated towards the moon by the SLS, and used its own engines to both decelerate into lunar orbit and accelerate back out of orbit to return to earth. The "12 or more" rockets you mention are required for landing missions. This is because Artemis is far more ambitious than Apollo. Apollo landed two men on the moon for three days at locations generally near the moon's equator. Artemis will be landing four people for a month near the moon's poles. This requires far more consumables, and additional fuel to reach a remote part of the moon. "I don't understand how seemingly intelligent people like Destin or Luke have enough cognitive dissonance to refuse to except the facts at hand." Which facts do you think are relevant? May I ask whether you have any relevant expertise in aerospace? Consider that aerospace engineers have no problem with the reality of Apollo. Consider also that thousands of scientists have studied the Apollo rocks, and they know those rocks can't be from the earth. "Yes, they made extraordinary progress just to get humans into orbit using outdated rocket technology (which will be useless in SPACE outside an gaseous atmosphere)" Rockets work just fine in the vacuum of space. In fact, rocket engines are more efficient in space than they are in the earth's atmosphere. "but how can you ignore the facts that the entirety of the boosters could barely get you into LEO, which is a stationary orbit unless you were to refuel and load up more boosters there..." Well, no. In order to get into earth orbit, all of the first and second stages were used up, but only about a quarter of the propellant in the third stage. The rest of the propellant in the third stage was used for accelerating the spacecraft out of earth orbit and towards the moon. "which was the original plan NASA had when they were going for REAL. In fact this is the challenge, which they face today... and the reason NOBODY has been able to have a manned flight back to the moon." I'm not aware of any plan for Apollo which involved refueling in-mission. Von Braun's original idea was giant rockets which would go all the way to the moon and all the way back. The earth orbit rendezvous plan involved only involved rendezvous and docking of the components for a manned lunar landing, but not any refueling.
@Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez5 днів тому
Big corporations hate circular economies... huh Apple? X'D
@MrGruffteddybear5 днів тому
The Saturn V was a beast. I still enjoy watching videos of them testing the F1's or the actual launches. What an incredible machine.And to have no catastrophic failures at all is astonishing. Goes to show the engineers and people who built them really cared about the finished product.
@amirsadeghi98885 днів тому
we need more footage of Luke Talley speaking about the space programs he worked on... he is full of wonders... he has probably met a few "little green men" too !
@080allanthomas56 днів тому
Candy 🍬 🍫 🍭
@larkinoo6 днів тому
I was lucky enough to go through the entire Rocket and Space Museum 2 years ago when one of my best friends flew me out to Huntsville for my birthday. I may have talked with Luke at the Lunar Module display. I tell just about everybody I meet about my trip to Huntsville, and that if they are ever in Huntsville, they need to go see everything at the Rocket and Space Museum, and specifically to see the Saturn 5 rocket and its awe inspiring F1 engines !! Great video !! Thanks !!
@aussiecraig75276 днів тому
Gday first time commenting on your channel, firstly you are fantastic always love your videos, secondly I loved this video, Luke..mate sorry for your loss.. but thank you Luke for your efforts changing the world you may not think so but honestly it’s your shoulders that people like musk and like stand on… Dustin I was moved to comment.. love the moon, space and your NASA pool video was awesome.
@MrocznyTechnik7 днів тому
I didn't realised that analog film is somehow electric :D. Photon caused photo-electron is doing the job. Just like in CCD sensor!!! :D
@xoversprayurfacex83887 днів тому
Machina Labs is truly operating at an unparalleled level. It's conceivable that Aerospace and government manufacturing entities are eagerly seeking to utilize your services or have you manufacture components for them.
@Tejas-zx7ie7 днів тому
It's a well known fact that bullets carry torches.
@adriankoch9648 днів тому
Thank you for interviewing Luke, what a great guy. Good job for NASA&Co for letting those knowledgable veterans share their knowledge. I'm sure they enjoy it a lot & it's a lot better than vegetating these great minds away in some retirement home away from people.
@dks138278 днів тому
Wow.........what a great video. I thank you.
@dks138278 днів тому
I have studied this since 1965.............and it is wonderful !!!!!!!!!
@michaellane47628 днів тому
It"s absolutely amazing how many industries there are that we never see. Thank-you, this video was amazing!!! The brilliant minds that are out there just amaze me. I wish I had 1/100 th of their knowledge.Mike from Mass.
@moda56298 днів тому
autist american
@aliasunknown74769 днів тому
Is that huntsville?
@danieldoherty81019 днів тому
It's been great to listen to someone who knows and understands what's he's talking about, instead of some bumbling idiot, (Elon musk)
@SquadTwelve123 дні тому
😂😂😂 tell me about it
@sammartinez42449 днів тому
Thanks for this video. The company I worked for in CA made the exit cone liners of the rocket motor. Directional carbon liners. I worked on various nuclear rocket cones along with the space shuttle solid rocket booster components. We had many pictures of the Saturn Rocket in the Kaiser Plant.
@user-lw7hw1gw9k10 днів тому
I have a 3d printer and i use a asus computer for cad but i also use it for gaming i would love to buy one of there computers but i dont want a desktop. (I am 9)
@deanpratley12510 днів тому
I agree. You can send an awe full lot of robots to Mars. I just can’t see sending people to Mars.
@HerbertTowers10 днів тому
Groin focus just before 3:00. Hmm.
@oldguyofarizona860211 днів тому
This man literally just told me how to do brain surgery using two syllable words. What a treasure!
@rcfreeman11 днів тому
PFM. The coolest interview ever!
@TeamMSound11 днів тому
Mehrere male angeschaut ! Pioniere ihrer Zeit !
@jnellie197011 днів тому
This channel should be called “Smarterer Everyday”. It’s just so poetic.
@tdawg71912 днів тому
Interesting to see other cultures differences in communication. Like when Destin says " so you've purchased it at this point", So goes " the company purchased it not me"
@MJ46.9112 днів тому
glue the match to the bullet
@user-dk8yw6td6g12 днів тому
영상의 도움을 받아 이해하고 있습니다. 감사합니다~
@slypen745013 днів тому
Why don't you ask one of the wizards to explain the NASA septic system on the Apollo missions? Then test it at home.
@maxfan15918 днів тому
What?
@markwright316114 днів тому
Some people found the literal speaking awkward, but seeing it as the way the majority speak is really interesting and enjoyable for me. 10 minutes of socialising per week sounds like bliss too. My brain differs enough from the social conventions of the UK to be identified as neurodivergent, autistic specifically. Getting direct answers, not needing to make frequent eye contact, being able to just keep to myself to do what I'm focusing on would be incredible every day. Even though the Finnish seem very accepting of English speakers, knowing how difficult their language is for foreigners, even if everything else permitted, I couldn't move there unless I could speak the native language fluently, and I'm someone who struggled with GCSE French. So, if anyone wants to start a mini-Finland-esk community in the middle of Northern Ireland, just let me know. :)
@danielshine521714 днів тому
The SWC was my favorite camera "Back in the Day", the ELM was a lot of fun too. Watching the video, I could taste the glue. Thanks for the wonderful content and bringing the memories.
@sblack4815 днів тому
I was there on Saturday geeking out. The display of the IU was amazing. Hearing Luke explain it was awesome. I’m an aero engineer and I’ve done a lot of wind tunnel work on airplanes. Right away I saw what I knew was a Saturn wind tunnel model! That’s a priceless piece of history.
@sblack4815 днів тому
From what I understand you could buy these in electronic surplus stores in the early 70s for next to nothing. Nobody knew what it was. Thankfully Someone did know and saved it.