After watching this video I only have one question - what about Canonical and their take on CLAs? Sure, their CLA also look shady that they can use your code you license to them (you don't sign rights off it!) in proprietary stuff they develop, but I'm curious.

RMS was right all along. Free Software > *

Can you try it with Ollama , or any LLM , i think now the great benchmark is Token/Seconds ^_^,

Bryan may have posted the video, but it is Brendan shouting at the JBOD.

I was a freeloader for a decade or so. Then I started my own business, and now I financially contribute very generously to all the open source (free software) projects my business has come to rely upon.

Even a Stallman can be right twice a day.

What is this abomination? The price is a joke as well.

Times are repeating. IBM, M$, Google, Yahoo, and others did this 20 years ago and now they're doing it to a new generation. I'm waiting for Oracle to by JavaScript just to complete the treachery.

Corporate Open Source works best when the software is mantained by a company that uses it to operate their business or services, rather than it being their main source of revenue.

Can you suggest me any small board with built-in ADC 16bit?

Everything changes... the only constant is the gullibility of the general public when it comes to things like new technologies lol This AI wave will burn a lot of fingers. It's like when hardware capabilities were increasing massively every year... invest in the wrong tech and in months, even weeks, along comes something better and yours is worthless in comparison.

i am not an experienced PC Builder, but there are two reasons to push air out instead of in. 1: Dust, pushing air in also pushes dust in. Arguably dust can be pulled in by the vacum created. 2: Reducing airpressure in an environment has an great cooling effect. I would be interested to hear your other peoples opinions on this?

Too many puns - unwatchable garbage.

I like the very subtle marketing hate. Very subtle. :D

One thing add here. Some of these now not open source projects had great devs contributing to that project and once you pull the rug these people will stop working on that project so usually what happens is that the project/software will get worse and worse over time and will also fall behind because the big corps have a hard time adopting to new trends.

Money talks and everything else walks. For billions of dollars I'd do some pretty sketchy stuff too.

Clickbait title

To be fair, I am not sad to see CentOS bite the dust.

"if you don't want freeloaders to use your software, then make it proprietary" "but then I would have to pay for its development! ☹️"

Developers: Open Source requires that you share for all to benefit IBM: Open Source requires ShareHolders to benefit

My wife had 1 creampie

👌👌👍👍

If Windows irks you so much, you can just install your favourite Linux distribution instead of it. As for performance, keep in mind Pi is ARM and the mini PC is x86-64 of AMD64 or whatever. That can make a big difference. For example I used to run a bunch of Docker services on a Pi 4 and when I tried to install OpenVPN server, I found it was a tremendous headache to get it to run on ARM. I ended up running it from my AMD64 HTPC instead of ARM Pi because it wasn't worth the headache.

owning multiple streaming is as much as cable now and now it’s even more

I don't count Ubuntu as one of the good guys anymore. On Windows you get constantly hassled to use OneDrive/Edge/Teams. On Ubuntu you get constantly hassled to use their paid security update nonsense. Time to switch to Mint forever.

Well, good luck to them

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Thank you for showing the debugging steps with the cluster, including how to see which pod had stalled and finding error logs using "describe". You can watch 100 happy path tutorials without ever seeing these things.

So FOSS is about to receive a lot less subversion and we can focus for a while? Great! It is like when all Icelandic women went on strike for 24h.

Alma Linux vs rocky linux? I thought they were both forked from CentOS and both had different CentOS devs

Welcome to RedHat6. Shame it took you this long to notice. #Debian4Life !

Corporate OpenSource is an oximoronic phrase. Corporations exists for profits, OpenSource exists for the spread of information. The idea that both can co-exist is co-existing in contradiction. The need for an ever growing profit by corporate stake holders will always beat out any reason for OpenSource distribution.

There is no free lunch . . .

Capitalism is the worst thing to happen to human generosity and innovation

Let me get this straight: it's more expensive, heavier, glitchier, and finickier than a normal laptop. With an idiotic keyboard to boot. Nice...

I always thought SUSE was pronounced like Suzy. Have I been wrong again?

Much of the open source code on the Internet is actually the intellectual property of large corporations which were unaware their employees were developing it at work using company resources. If corporate managers were to cross-reference lists of employees with developers working on open source projects and then compare the timestamps of source code posting they could develop evidence to prove their ownership of the code.

it is weird for me to say that I hoped it would've Microsoft who bought that not IBM

I'm not sure what I just watched, it sounds like you're saying coders like to write code for free and never want to make money from it but the greedy suits take this free code and turn it into business to milk money from, is that right? I'm just trying to understand the rug pull issue, if you created the software shouldn't it be your right to charge for it and if people forked it wouldn't they just be stealing your work/intellectual property.

Should've used the AGPL.

11:14 didn’t realize Jeff’s Only Fans page handle is Large 😂

At last, I witnessed the Geerling who provided all the companies I worked for their inventory of ansible roles. Instantly subscribed.

Good to see Jeff still refuses to admit that RHEL is based off of CentOS Stream without mods .. UNLIKE Rocky Linux who is charging customers for upstream kernels but not a single mention of that

We will always suffer from that while people fear the big C

I blame Jeff and Aws for not creating a revenue model for open source projects and just milking them as SAAS.

It was all a matter of time, only depend on a company if you plan on them rugpulling

It's not dead. It's passed "F around" phase, and currently in the "find out" phase.

In the long run, Stallman is always right.

So why is Rasberry Pi a villian? Have they gone greedy? Grapeing employees? Or is this just a click bait tittle?

Thats how you keep the stock market growing, Screw everyone and make everything worse. Remember that the next time the news assures you the economy is strong.