No. Relax, Vicki. None of the witness testimonies are "AI generated". Look at the notice at the top of the screen at 2:47 in red. All the voice actors are credited at 1:37:12. In almost all cases, the voice actors are reading verbatim (racial epithets have been changed) from the transcripts of the real, spoken testimony of the witnesses in open hearings.

Get your ears checked out? 4:58 "For a buck 25 an hour, Oswald's job was to prepare the books for shipping." It’s $1.25 an hour, not $25.00 an hour.

Why

No. JFK's head jerks forward after the bullet hits. You have to look at the individual frames to see it clearly but, once you see it, it's as clear as day. Look at frames 312 to 314. The bullet hits Kennedy's head in frame 312. at that moment, the crown of his head is clearly above the level of the black line behind him formed by the top of the side of the limo. Now look at frame 313. This is the famous frame in which you can see the President's head explode. Now look at the crown of his head. See that it is now level with that black line formed by the top of the side of the limo. Notice also that the blood and brain tissue is being thrown up and forward, as a result of the bullet hitting. Now look at frame 314. The crown of Kennedy's head is now below the line of the top of the side of the limo. His head has jerked forward sharply. That movement has occurred in a tenth of a second. No one else in the car shows any sign of a similar movement. The backwards movement of JFK's head and torso doesn't start until from 316, long after the bullet has gone. As I guess you are aware, there are many other reasons why Kennedy could not have been shot from the front... We can account for everyone who was in front of the limo at the time of the head shot. None of them had a rifle. None of them saw a rifle. None of them thought that a shot had been fired from anywhere near them. If he was shot from the front, why did the head shot bullet have rifling marks which showed that it could only have come from Oswald's gun? How did the lead contents of that bullet end up in the front of Kennedy's brain cavity and on the inside of the windshield? If he Kennedy was shot from the front, what happened to the bullet? What happened to the shell casing? If you reverse the trajectory of the head shot bullet, as if it had come from the front, then you find that the bullet must have emerged spontaneously from the asphalt of the street. If the head shot came from the front, why is the exit wound on the top right of Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film? Why is the entrance wound at the back of the head in the x-rays, the autopsy report, the pathology report and the autopsy photos?

It's not worth discussing that aspect of the conspiracy theories because it's been shown countless times that even relatively inexperienced shooters can replicate and better what Oswald did.

@@sallyside8855 No, that is still highly controversial among serious conspiracy theorists today. It is theoretically possible, but practically impossible. Firstly, the clips from the assembly line need to be replaced and secondly, Oswald's Carabiner had some problems. So the conspiracy mythologists' argument refers to the specific weapon that Oswald is said to have used. But that being said, the CIA has withheld millions of documents for years, and even today there are still thousands of documents missing that are classified. Even the HSCA has admitted that the Warren Commission had already been working under the bias of portraying Oswald as a lone perpetrator and concealing a conspiracy. It was for political reasons because of the Cold War and stuff. Too many question marks remain and then there is the questionable execution by a nightclub owner from the underworld? Well, I don't know... :) But this is definitely not a story where I would without a doubt agree with the official version because of "Yes, yes it was Oswald" and happy ending.

@@knuthansen8524 -- _”No, that is still highly controversial among serious conspiracy theorists today.”_ It doesn’t matter whether or not the question is controversial among the conspiracy-minded. All that matters is the plain and obvious evidence, and there are even UKposts videos that show shooters firing and cycling the Carcano rifle in less time than figures for Oswald himself. The amount of time Oswald needed to get off three shots is not in any serious dispute. _”Firstly, the clips from the assembly line need to be replaced…”_ What “clips”? Do you mean the _shims_ for the scope? _”…Oswald's Carabiner had some problems.”_ It’s _carbine,_ not “Carabiner.” _”But that being said, the CIA has withheld millions of documents for years, and even today there are still thousands of documents missing that are classified.”_ What is your source for those numbers, please? (e.g., “millions”) _”Even the HSCA has admitted that the Warren Commission had already been working under the bias of portraying Oswald as a lone perpetrator and concealing a conspiracy.”_ No. The HCSA didn’t “admit” anything about the Warren Commission, but gave its partially dissenting response to the Warren Report itself. The HCSA posited the *_probability_* of a conspiracy, not its certainty. _”…and then there is the questionable execution by a nightclub owner from the underworld?”_ Why do you find Ruby’s actions to be “questionable.” And how are you defining “underworld.”

@@knuthansen8524 You are very vague and you have a bad case of conspiracy thinking. Start looking at the evidence. 1. "No, that is still highly controversial among serious conspiracy theorists today. It is theoretically possible, but practically impossible." There are literally dozens of videos on youtube alone, showing that what Oswald did was not only possible, but relatively easy for anyone who had experience with rifles. Here are some of my favorites" "JFK Assassination: Fast and Accurate Carcano" "'A CBS News Inquiry: The Warren Report' (1967) Rifle Tests Preview" "Simulating the Kennedy Assassination with the Oswald Carcano" "1940 M38 CARCANO - LEE HARVEY OSWALD [PUTRAS] - 25 & 200 YARDS - 3 SHOTS LESS THAN 8 SECS! - Ep. 16" This argument is redundant. 2. "Firstly, the clips from the assembly line need to be replaced" ? I have no idea what this even means. Very vague. 3. "and secondly, Oswald's Carabiner had some problems. So the conspiracy mythologists' argument refers to the specific weapon that Oswald is said to have used." No. Tests found it to be a good, accurate, reliable weapon. 4. "But that being said, the CIA has withheld millions of documents for years," Nonsense. There have never been millions of withheld documents. 5. "and even today there are still thousands of documents missing that are classified." About 4,000. To put that in perspective... Since 1992, there has been an ongoing mandatory release program. Tens of thousands of documents have been released since 1992. About 4,000 more were released during the Trump administration. President Biden’s “Memorandum for the heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on the Temporary Certification Regarding Disclosure of Information in Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F Kennedy”, dated October 22nd 2021 sped up the process and has declassified thousands of documents relating to the killing of JFK in the last 3 years. In December 2021 alone, when Biden’s memo kicked in, 1,491 documents were released. In December 2022 alone, 13,263 more were released. In 2023, 2,695 were released. All are easily viewable on the website of the National Archive. They are not very interesting. All such releases are subject to security review. It’s thought that the remaining documents are being withheld at the moment because of concerns about revealing the identities of long-term intelligence sources in crime families and in foreign countries. Unless that 1992 legislation is repealed, they will all be released in the next few years "Even the HSCA has admitted that the Warren Commission had already been working under the bias of portraying Oswald as a lone perpetrator and concealing a conspiracy. It was for political reasons because of the Cold War and stuff." That's not what the HSCA said at all. It's not even what the Warren Commission said. Both investigations had very similar conclusions. Neither ruled out a conspiracy. Both absolutely agreed that Oswald killed Kennedy. Look at the evidence. "Too many question marks remain and then there is the questionable execution by a nightclub owner from the underworld? Well, I don't know... :) But this is definitely not a story where I would without a doubt agree with the official version because of "Yes, yes it was Oswald" and happy ending." Again, you are talking in vague terms about your own and other people's perceptions. What am I supposed to say to "then there is the questionable execution by a nightclub owner from the underworld"? Try to be precise and accurate in what you say, then we can work out what you mean. Look at the evidence.

Oswald was a nobody who wanted to make a name for himself. If you look at the biographical facts of his life you will understand why he did it.

@@9Ballr Yes, after browsing through articles about him, he seems to be very deranged in the head, erratic, very angry and hotheaded. An angry man child who blamed everything on the world. I can definitely see him as an attention seeker just like the guy who killed John Lennon. They both wanted to make a name for themselves the most devious way possible. People like that are a danger to society .

@@9Ballr Yes, after browsing through articles about him, he seems to be very deranged in the head, erratic, very angry and hotheaded. An angry man child who blamed everything on the world. I can definitely see him as an attention seeker just like the guy who killed John Lennon. They both wanted to make a name for themselves the most devious way possible.