NASA is neglecting other things. Perseverence should pluck Ingenuity out of the sand and set it where it can still observe Mars. If the samples are scattered, maybe they could get gathered and placed near Ingenuity to get scooped up. Once the samples get back to Earth, scientists will fight over them, so those studies don't have to be budgeted now. Treat Ingenuity like a sample and haul it home.
@choochoochooseyou21 годину тому
😂😂😂 they're on Devon Island.
@Atom_LineДень тому
Discovered super recently your channel. Excited about already 🎉 🩷❕.🧠
@jimfarmer7811День тому
What a Rube Goldberg plan. If wasn't for all the egos involved the sample return could probably be done relatively inexpensively. For example, if the Falcon heavy replaced the spacex upper stage with a Centaur the rocket could deliver a large payload to Mars. Rocket lab could probably design a return vehicle that would launch a capsule directly to earth. But of course that's never going to happen.
@mike_98058День тому
Returning samples was always a foolish idea. There are much better places to search for life.
@onewhostudies68562 дні тому
we will find evidence of life. and bacterial and small plant life.
@allanrichards37523 дні тому
That looks a very complex mission with loads of potential for failure.. I have just read the book Chariots for Apollo and the original schemes were talking of going to the moon and going to Mars also in a sort of continuous long term plan for NASA. I think Kennedy's goal of beating the Russians to the moon was a double edged sword. It gave NASA a short term goal with an ideal point to cut funding. I was also really disappointed when there was no plans to build a Mk2 STS shuttle. I feel the whole of manned space exploration is in the doldrums. I was hoping to see people on Mars in my lifetime but I doubt I will see people on the moon again let alone Mars.
@LuigiRBedin3 дні тому
Yep, much better to collect several tons and bring them back with Starship not later than 2035 ... probably much earlier. I bet 1 dollar.
@Sheaker3 дні тому
Thank You Mars Guy! It does not sound good to me. I was sure the plan is already prepared and approved!
@MarsGuy2 дні тому
NASA has adopted in recent years a recommended strategy to utilize an independent review board to review large missions before giving final approval. That's what has happened here.
@otpyrcralphpierre17423 дні тому
How about this....Concentrate resources to completing the Mars mission already underway, return the samples to Earth, and delay the other pie-in-the-sky missions to other planets and their moons.
@LegendLength3 дні тому
Seems weird to do the study after everything has been sent up to Mars
@petramitchell71623 дні тому
What's a hail mary pass??
@akalaification3 дні тому
Lol, the waymo drove past my old bartending gig at 5th and University.
@waxeggoil31303 дні тому
One of the most obvious ways to obtain help is to involve china, who have some experience in this sort of thing.
@mikerussell32983 дні тому
Maybe politely ask China?
@gigabane73573 дні тому
there is absolutely no reason why nasa cannot design a nature based ammonia form of lighter than air to use as a sky carrier to reduce costs that houses biological 'fire extinguishers' that eat ammonia for the prevention of environmental contamination. absorbing heat through albedo is a sure fire efficiency booster... Step your game up nasa. you have all the IQ in the room and not a single visionary.
@willierants58803 дні тому
Politics aside, this was always an ill conceived plan that has a near zero chance of seeing the light of day. However without a way of returning these samples, Perseverance is nothing more than a means of delivering Ingenuity to the surface of Mars. Something that could've been for much less if that was the only mission. Perseverance isn't doing what hasn't already been done and is continuing to be done by other rovers. Calling into question the entire mission aside from Ingenuity.
@wordylefty13 дні тому
Just get China to go get the samples
@edmollette89293 дні тому
If and when the samples get back to earth, this might be the beginning of the end, if will unwittingly bring back some virulent form of bacteria, virus, or worse!
@roberttelarket49343 дні тому
Easy let's get UPS!!! If anybody get the stuff it’s them!
@pedzsan3 дні тому
Ok… I’m sexist. But seeing 100% women on that board confirms all of my biases.
@topcat43truffles153 дні тому
Thank you Mars Guy for an excellent update. I want to know how we spent a fortune to send a rover to Mars that’s collecting samples, without a definitive retrieval plan? IMO, someone’s head should be on a spike….(figuratively, not literally) As far as spending another 8 to 11 billion on something that hasn’t even been constructed yet, I say pass…. Put that money into the development of sending a maned expedition for establishing a permanent foothold on Mars… Then maybe figuring out how to more cheaply fetch the samples once that beachhead has been established. ( actually, this is way above my pay grade) 👍🏻😎
@thometheiousvladizar70443 дні тому
at some point this project becomes pointless because people will be going there and can collect the same themselves.
@jtp03214 дні тому
NASA---Let's see how overly complicated and expensive and disappointing we can make this
@A3Kr0n4 дні тому
$200 fine for littering, each offense.
@enlaescnoaprendinada4 дні тому
public agency cost: YES spaceX: "nasa/10 cost" XD
@sargonofakad4 дні тому
So, let me get this straight: you designed a sample & return setup on the lander but did no have a clear plan for the return of the samples? And now you need help in getting the samples back home? How absurd. Have you tried calling Elon Musk?
@grahamgillard37224 дні тому
Hang on. If that’s so difficult, what’s the chances of getting a human being there and back?
@dhwardani4 дні тому
Not a single guy in that association administration meeting board🤔 so much for gender equality lmao
@dillonahrens81124 дні тому
All i hear the administration saying is "We don't care if it succeeds we just want it to be cheap"...
@flvnow4 дні тому
The Chinese are doing a sample return soon, maybe see how that goes
@NewZealandPakeha4 дні тому
They should not bring samples to earth. 🌙 Moon base or likely starship laboratory
@AceSpadeThePikachu4 дні тому
All we need is for the Chinese space agency to announce they plan to do a Mars sample return mission first AND establish military installations on Mars, and just like that NASA will have all the government funding it needs for the next thirty years.
@bobbreit52444 дні тому
Pull some of the wasteful cash from King Newsom's California train to nowhere and build the return system. It would be a small budget inconvenience for the golden child.
@ChrisBarnard-rh9ob4 дні тому
It's funny how they get such the budget to spend and yet NASA of all companies and corporations, needs help. Does the monopoly really not have enough?
@connecticutaggie4 дні тому
Could it be thermal erosions? Especially if water used to be present?
@-mike-81344 дні тому
I really hope that Nasa timeline and price estimate included the usual 300+ percent cost overruns and the three time longer timeline delays too but probably not. ps. loved Mars Guy being cut off by the solar panels! very funny..
@MarsGuy3 дні тому
Glad you were amused by that!
@heathermichael39874 дні тому
Pray to Jesus.
@heathermichael39874 дні тому
It’s out of the box and something I doubt NASA would do 🤷♀️ Can’t hurt .
@brunov9584 дні тому
Apparently wars are more important than Science
@charliekempf4 дні тому
I say we just put mars guy on a starship and have him go pickup the samples himself
@MarsGuy3 дні тому
Ha ha!
@-Thauma-4 дні тому
Brillant, as always! Thank you Mr. Mars 😘
@MarsGuy3 дні тому
Thanks again!
@brokman18244 дні тому
Stupid waste of time. Just eat mushrooms, like a normal person and that will get you to space, beyond the asteroid belt and that will be a great accomplishment, you need those one guys tho. 😢 😭 but I don't Mind them.
@-Thauma-4 дні тому
Your stupid comment shows why not to take your advice...
@AerialWaviator4 дні тому
The "Hail Mary" pass begins on Earth (not Mars), which significantly determines the constrains for MSR (Mars Sample / Return) mission. I'm specifically referring to the rocket booster(s) that are required to launch the NASA and ESA spacecraft to Mars for MSR. The cost for these rocket boosters will likely be more than 50% of mission costs, but are hardly mentioned. or discussed! 🚀🙀 The odds are good that a reusable rocket (like FalconHeavy, Neutron, Starship, TerranR, etc) can place a larger mass in LEO at lower cost than any prior booster within the required timeframe. With ESA being a partner, their role needs to be negotiated to avoid geopolitical politics. As current strategy has ESA providing the critical MSR travel logistics. Worth noting, that ESA has instruments launching on Chang'e 6 from China in May (2024) which will collect the first lunar samples from the far-side of the moon. (Don't ask NASA's current director, as he's in the dark on lunar far-side matter. Sorry, bad pun. ;) A reminder that ESA can work with some spacefaring nations, that U.S. Congress has banned NASA conducting collaborations. Side note: China has reiterated in recent weeks that it has goals to to conduct a MSR mission in the 2030 timeframe, along with goal of a crewed lunar landing before 2030, and establishing a lunar base by 2040. Nothing like a little game of "space race" for added competition and motivation. ⚽✨🏁
@falconvisionuavloworbit4 дні тому
I don't see a problem with our current technology being able to recover and inventory the core samples for return flight back to earth. Are they asking for new or newer technologies or a better recovery process?
@paul91204 дні тому
Maybe the struggle was just a dispute on Devon Island about land rights.
@tpboeh4 дні тому
Sounds designed to fail, NASA can do better than this. Or ask the Chinese, they’ll be there long before NASA figures out what went wrong.
@tomstruble73804 дні тому
Here's an idea - STOP giving open ending bottomless contracts to aerospace contractors that have NO intention of actually fulfilling their contract at any cost - it's just an endless check for the contractor with no realistic plan on making any of it happen.
@simjo594 дні тому
Man, talk about a Rube Goldberg-type of mission! If any one part of the mission fails, the whole chain collapses. Who writes this stuff?
@redpillcommando4 дні тому
If NASA were to ask Elon Musk nicely, he might be willing to send those samples back home with the first returning StarShip. No I'm not kidding.
@freedomspeech95234 дні тому
@ 4:05 MSR Independent review board - only women? No male is allowed to advance in science and technology anymore? DEI much? Just to decree it is "too expensive, too complex"? We spent a magnitude order more on war in a different country.