And the germans lost Tigers to far more inferior tanks 😂 War is largely about attrition, not about "unbeatable" weapons systems

And the crew survived.

This is BS Russian propaganda.

I love Russian planes but man all these comments. I know America isn't invincible but even if the western news is lying, you can't honestly think that Russia's military doesn't have some issues and would have their hands more than full going against NATO. Jesus, it's tough to even read.

You could replace tu160 with the b1 and the story is damn near the same.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO *rage quit*

If Putin wins in Ukraine he will have secured 13T in Rare Metals. Europe's Largest . Wars for Metals

If they remove the retractable wheel could that space house gatling guns? If stuts are used how much speed would be lost? Or range?

All tanks can be destroyed, but I rather be in the Abram than a T72; at least if it blows up, i have a higher chance that I don’t blow up with it. Tanks are dependent on who spots and shoots first and also how they’re deployed and what sort of combined arms assets they have (infantry, anti-air cover, artillery). The Ukrainians haven’t been able to have have any adequate number of supporting elements at all. In addition, from most sources, I believe they were given the baseline Abrams (M1A1 SA model) which might not have the same level or any depleted uranium armour found in US models, so it’s not too surprising either.

Most effective? The Lancet

Should made it as an AI controlled machine

Can't believe anything russian mod says. Did an abrams get destroyed? yes. Was it destroyed by a t72 in first shot? No.

Huh huh!!

Cannot compare to the junk nato uses🤣🤣🤣

That was not a M1A1 Tank that was a Assault Breacher Vehicle

Losing three tanks is news? Of course it's not invincible. You only quote a State that lied since the beginning of their invasion

We're not sending them Abrams tanks with the full, classified armor package. And the Russians are no slouches either, they've evolved into a very effective combat force. Add to that the fact that the aged ukes tend to run and abandon vehicles at the first sign of trouble.

why west don't like Putin ? The West does not care about undemocracy and intolerance in those countries that give their money to the West. Kazakhstan gave 90% of its oil to the United States when Nazarbayev was president, and everything is fine with shaking hands with Western rulers. Tolerance, multi-gender and other nonsense are not some kind of anti-human goals of the West, but simply banal means, tools for achieving one’s monetary, selfish interests - seizing and maintaining economic domination over the globe. Putin is disliked by the West because he did not give Russian oil and gas to Western TNCs. And he even partially took back what was given away under Yeltsin. This behavior of Putin sets an undesirable example for other enslaved peoples and therefore such a example should be punished in an exemplary manner.

This AI generated voice is really weird lol!

diameter = length, 39 meters = 3,9 meters. ;)

Btw Russians since ever think that western(Europe and USA) are easy to conquer coz theire people are week.

Abrams sent to Ukraine is not used properly and the tank it's own is not 100% modern Abrams. We talk about huge corruption in Ukraine.

Russian shovels are beautiful and deadly !😅

Battlefield junk😂😂😂

All the gear supplied to Ukr was outdated and meant to be scrapped in a few years. Sending the scrap to UA was cheaper than dismantling it to european rules and regulations.

How? It’s called good shot placement and having an Abrams crew that couldn’t find their butts with both hands.

How daft was NATO, embroiling itself in a war that didn't concern them? Now their military technologies are being reversed engineered by Russia and Iran, China by extention.

🇷🇺 Russia is fighting for his future securities and safety issues he right on this time never disturb any country like America 🇺🇸

The s500 is a great piece of kit but you can bet your last penny that the Russian bears are already working on the s600

ukrainians are sacrificing themselves for american profits in the us military industrial complexd

Russia has more than enough parts to keep planes in the sky. NATO is full of BS.

Word Record. For cost of a clown

For some reason I doubt all this russian reported stuff...

Abrams down? Well....uranium ammo for sure

The archer was recovered and repaired and are now back in service 👍🏻

💪🇷🇺🇮🇷💪🇷🇺🇮🇷💪🇷🇺🇮🇷💪😎😎😎😎😎😎🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱

The only way to put an end to all of this is ONLY by negotiation’s Russia will never bend and I mean never by force and the west corrupt politicians can’t understand that ,because their stupidity is unbelievable ,by the way the only Christian country these days 🇷🇺

The only thing the Russians learned by capturing “advanced” Western military equipment is how NOT to make military equipment. Russian equipment is for war and victory. Western tech -- for making more money for the arms manufacturers and their top brass lobbyists. Money taken out of taxpayers' pockets.

3:54 "-Впечатляющие летно-технические характеристики танка Т72" )))))

The Abrams tanks they're sending to Ukraine, are old tanks with old technology... Not current technology, used by untrained personal... No surprise here...

Nope it will provide nothing, this garbage is old af and it is a joke for Russia.

Russian propaganda channel. Easy to create myths and rumors by patching together video clips and photos. Russian military is a joke. Advancing 30 kilometers in 2.3 years. and I will commend you dear Russian communications operator. You are using AI text to voice software. :)

Poor ukraine have the comidian as a their leader...

urraaa❤

idiots zlenzky..

😊😊😊 American News channels and propagandist UKpostsrs will never show this to their viewers 😅😅😅

during World War II and on the Eastern Front, the Russians were terrified for some time when the Tiger and Panther tanks entered service, as the German tank was an engineering miracle at the time, but it was complex in manufacturing, expensive, and of large size, and it was capable of destroying 8 Soviet T-34 tanks before It was destroyed, but for every German Tiger tank the Russians produced 12 T-34 tanks, as they were simple in design, low in cost, and very fast and difficult to hit, and the Russians won the war in the end. The size and speed of the T-72 or T-90 are much more important than the armor and firepower of Western tanks Despite the technology and power that American and Western tanks carry in general, they have not actually been tested in any wars. Other than that they have succeeded in overcoming harsh natural factors, they have not been tested against more advanced weapons and have not participated in battles against powerfully armed armies (the Taliban movement or the Iraqi army). (With years of siege or ISIS) they are absolutely no equal or a standard to judge its strength and capabilities Many Abrams tanks were destroyed by the RPG-7 anti-tank grenade launcher Where the side was even pierced by a PG-7V shell (This is one of the oldest types of shells.) Chemical energy shells are also sufficient to penetrate the side armor The Iraq war revealed weaknesses The front armor of the Abrams tank has good defense against anti-tank weapons used by the Iraqis However, these expectations were false, as it was subject to destruction even by missile launchers from the sixties of the last century. The tank is vulnerable to destruction from the top of the roof, on the sides and at the back 🔴Some reported cases : 30 mm armor-piercing shells penetrated the tank from behind The left and right sides were damaged by a rocket-propelled grenade strike (damage from RPG shots) Recording cases of losses due to anti-tank mines A strike in the tower resulted in the death of one of the crew members The engine showed slightly reduced capabilities The tank was completely destroyed by a bomb explosion from within and by two Maverick missile strikes The tank was destroyed by hits from below and a hit on the side with an RPG After the official end of Operation (Iraq War), the loss of tanks not only did not decrease, but increased as a result of the main tanks and infantry fighting vehicles being hit by anti-mines and rocket-propelled grenades that were used by the Iraqi resistance in ambushes on the patrolling roads of the American forces 🔷For example, in 2003, 40 kilometers from Baghdad, to the northeast of the city, an Abrams tank belonging to the 4th Mechanized Division was destroyed by an improvised bomb consisting of several artillery shells. As a result of the tank’s explosion, the turret flew at a distance of 30 meters It remains that the T-72 or T-90 tank is superior to the Abrams and Western tanks in gun range and tank range. Its small size provides it with great maneuverability Abrams tanks and Western tanks in general are good for countries like the Gulf states that possess enormous oil wealth

Note: In fact, tanks are not used to fight other tanks. Rather, their main task is to penetrate the enemy’s defenses. Therefore, it makes sense to compare their capabilities if we compare the characteristics of speed, maneuverability, transportability, and the ability to withstand anti-tank ambushes. In this regard, the Soviet tank building experience was taken into account. World War II: While the American Abrams tank did not, it is a heavy and purely defensive tank with thick front armor that is completely isolated from the side and rear protrusions on the march. An example of this is the recent cemetery of Saudi tanks that were ambushed by the Houthis, with anti-tank weapons considered somewhat old. In addition, the advantage of Soviet tank models over most Western models is that Soviet tanks are placed on a platform (vehicle) while Western tanks are not, and this factor provides a strategic advantage. In fact, the maneuverability and speed of the T-72 or T-90 tank is the most important thing in penetrating enemy ranks, especially in large numbers The T-72 and T-90 tanks fight in any conditions, according to the American magazine ( National Interest ) As a reminder: The American website specialized in the military field (Military Watch Magazine) said that Russia was not interested in sending modern tanks to Ukraine and relied on old and cheap mechanisms, most notably the Soviet T-72 tank (of its various types) because the military reality indicates that the modern tank will not It alone succeeds in changing the course of any war Each tank has its advantages and disadvantages, and the Russian tanks have disadvantages and advantages, and the American and Western tanks also have disadvantages and advantages, but the Russian tanks It has a high maneuverability and is much better than the western one while the western one is superior in the level of armor They were claiming and promoting that the Turkish marches would change the course of the war, so they broke our heads (bayraktar bayraktar bayraktar) when they actually failed and many of them were shot down. They remained silent and then their sense disappeared and then they came with a cylinder (Javelin Javelin.Javelin Javelin Javelin) when they failed they became ( Rombo, Rombo, Rombo )..hohohoho. A talk that is nothing more than gossip in the context of the media war led by the United States and its affiliates and the Western psychological war against Russia

Vive la Russie