I knew it was gonna be like 1 off so I guessed 33. Half right

Give this man a nobel for fucks sake!

I believe the first prisoner needs to decode the coin pattern on the chess board, then turn the key square coin over and hope the other person can find the one coin that doesn’t fit the pattern that he too sees on the board. The problem I have is that I haven’t figured out the pattern yet! 😮

As an Asian my parents expect me to do this in seconds

This is probably the best and most straightforward, thorough, and honest explanation on the topic I've found. I love people who say, "This is just a fancy way of saying X." Aside from being clear to understand, it's also just a really wonderful character trait. This guy nails the intuitive explanation.

That's a very good and lucid explaination. God job and thank you to the entire team to clear things up. But the downside is, now I'm underwhelmed of this technology. I already knew most of this stuff, and hoped, there's a "secret ingredient" I don't know. An igredient that makes these transformers so powerful. It's like becoming desillusionized, by revealing the tricks of a magician.

Nice video

me: why is circumference 2πR? edit: I already know it just kidding

Your solution contains serious vulnerabilities that are difficult to fix. If each vibrating layer of material (glass) introduced very minute phase changes to the incoming EM wave, then the angle of refraction of the EM wave would depend on the thickness of the material. Your explanation implies the following conclusion: the thicker the material (glass), the greater the angle between the ray entering the material (glass) and the ray leaving the material. Additionally, inside the material (glass) we would see a ray of light whose path resembles the arc of a circle, because all the layers would change direction by a very small angle, creating an arc of a circle.

things went pretty bad for me after multiplication=stretching/rotation analogy😢

Thank you so much for these masterpieces! When to expect the next part on transformers? Do you plan chapters on generative neural networks, like images generations neural networks, etc.?

Just brillant.. there is no video in UKposts that explains concepts in such a clever way

The wall be like I have inf kg

Lord riemann🗣️🔥

15:10 that means the integer dimensions are called area-under-slope finders... bad joke.

Very helpful!

It's frustrating for a person who intuitively understands probability, and sees how most people and society make terrible choices and share false beliefs. What also is really frustrating and more about statistics is how people often speak of averages without variance which can be extremely misleading. As well as binary thinking of predictions are and surprise when something does or doesn't happen. For example asking experts if something will or will not happen, which is often a nonsense question without chance estimates, and then discounting their competence as "wrong" when their 70% prediction doesn't happen.

!

!

Alternatively "How Flash could win against Superman"

Powers of two? THE POWER OF TWO?!

The 1kg block is a chad. He is scaring away his bullies

Wake up bro, new way to approximate pi just dropped

MATE THAT'S NOT WHAT I MEANT BY "LEARNING THE AXIS"

Thanks a lot lot. Please upload the chapter 7.

What if.. Hear me out. There IS a rule that states lines cannot directly cross each other. BUT THERE ISN'T a rule stating they cant cross the sources themselves.

couldn't we define integrals as a query on R^2 or even any space over any field?

bro is casually reducing the mathematical intelligence gap

This reminds me of Bessel's correction

beautiful ❤

Watching this entire video was a cathartic experience. Can't wait for the chapter 7 where the emphasis is on the feed forward neural network weights training!

so its = pi me: ... wait wha-

Thank you very very much. Amazing work. Amazingly clear

What can you say about making these transformers 'transparent' like European Parliament demands. For the purpose of preventing biased outpu. Do you deem that possible?

Let me guess, that's ALSO because of this little thing: *π*

My intuition says that if you have 3 basis vectors on a 2D space, one of them is always redundant. Is this correct?

Fantastic video. Explaining complex concepts with powerful visuals is amazing. 1000s of articles on transformers/embedding are no match to this one video. Enjoyed it.

Wow… this is beautiful, the video just made my day. Thank you!

the 3rd triangle is similar but not congruent

me in ap stat seeing 1.645 as the z* for 90% confidence

"pat yourself on the back" how???

Fun fact: if the test classified everyone as negative, it would be wrong ten times less, and 99% accurate!

Hello this 1 year ago

Turn over the coin with the key.

OMG this is sooo amazing.

i have been working to understand basis vectors for the past 2 days and you've just made me understand it in 12:50 minutes

What a previous video are you talking about?

this guy made me UNDERSTAND linear algebra, not just memorize to put down.

Blud just produced some radiation noises

How do I get this kind of understanding without videos like this? Its a question mostly and partly aweness(if that word exists).