Just let alone faster.❤

Huh what? Your statement bares no facts , just blind ignorance. Well nvm you must have skipped school.

I believe Jeremiah 4: 23-28 KJV describes the destruction of the dinosaurs leading up to rebuilding of destroyed earth and universe at Genesis 1:2 KJV.

I,m riyalli exs pirinsss😊😊❤❤

When I watch stuff like this I just think like damn we are just grains of sand in the grand scheme of things so complex

You guys spend too much time one your computers to deciave people and defy God, wait your time will come

ITER is not even built yet so its introduction of 2007 so wrong by about 20 years. Similarly NIF has only recently 2023 had any limited success in fusion! The power needed for the laser is comparable with that for a very large city with one shot per day when ten per second are needed and so it has an enormous way to go. The power to drive the laser is so large they will never make it generate any excess power! Plus most of the fuel input is wasted and not burnt!

Relief arrives when realized that all of my socalled past never actually existed

A lot of gopalygook.still a manifestations, not actually existing.no manifestations does.all fictional.reality exist in the human mind and nowhere else.all nook's and crannies, including all words.

Stop asking "Why are we here?" Start asking "What are we to do while here?" There is no reason as to why. Entropy has no logic. It just "Is". I like to ask "How are we here?"

Could have means....I don't know..

How do you know?

God said, "Let there be light." After that, a bunch of other stuff happened, and God did that, too.

The Milky Way galaxy is going up to solar system with the going to universe that starts with so scared to figure it out watch this 👉 2:23

Seasonal changes are not due to perihelion and aphelion but are due to the tilt of the Earth's axis. If it were due only to perihelion and aphelion, then the northern and southern hemispheres would have the same seasons. Pretty glaring mistake in this video.

Geocentric? Nope Heliocentric?Nope Lunacentric YUP

Here are a few examples of important equations that humanity currently uses which contain contradictions or paradoxes, along with potential non-contradictory versions based on the infinitesimal monadological framework: 1. Quantum Field Theory - Renormalization Contradictory: In quantum field theory, the calculation of physical quantities often leads to infinite integrals or divergent series. To resolve this, the process of renormalization is used, which effectively "subtracts" infinities to obtain finite results. However, this process is mathematically inconsistent and leads to issues like the hierarchy problem. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, quantum fields could be represented as sections of monadic bundles, with interactions modeled by relational algebras between infinitesimal generators. By working with non-standard analysis and surreal numbers, divergent integrals could be replaced by well-defined hyperfinite sums, avoiding the need for ad-hoc renormalization: Φ(x) = ∫ Φ̃(k)e^(ik⋅x) dk → Φ(x) = ∑_{k∈*K} *Φ(k)e^(ik⋅x) *dk Here, *K represents a hyperfinite momentum space, *Φ(k) are the monadic field amplitudes, and *dk is an infinitesimal measure. 2. General Relativity - Singularities Contradictory: In general relativity, Einstein's field equations relate the curvature of spacetime to the distribution of matter and energy. However, these equations break down at singularities like black holes or the Big Bang, where the curvature becomes infinite and the equations lose predictive power. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, spacetime could be modeled as an emergent structure arising from the relational interactions between infinitesimal monadic observers. Singularities could then be resolved as regions where the monadic perspectives become highly entangled or non-separable, leading to non-commutative geometric effects: Gμν + Λgμν = 8πTμν → Gμν + Λ*gμν = 8π⟨Tμν⟩_m Here, *gμν represents a non-commutative monadic metric, and ⟨Tμν⟩_m is an averaged stress-energy tensor over monadic perspectives. 3. Navier-Stokes Equations - Turbulence Contradictory: The Navier-Stokes equations describe the motion of viscous fluid substances and are a cornerstone of fluid dynamics. However, they are notoriously difficult to solve, and the existence of smooth, globally defined solutions remains an open Millennium Prize problem. In particular, the equations struggle to model turbulent flows, where the solutions can become chaotic and unpredictable. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, fluid dynamics could be modeled as a collective behavior emerging from the interactions of infinitesimal monadic fluid elements. Turbulence could then be understood as a regime where the monadic perspectives become highly correlated and exhibit non-linear, chaotic dynamics: ∂u/∂t + (u⋅∇)u = -∇p + ν∇²u → ∂u_m/∂t + (u_m⊗*u_m)*∇_m = -*∇_mp_m + ν*∇_m^2u_m Here, u_m, p_m, ∇_m represent velocity, pressure, and gradient operators in a non-commutative monadic fluid algebra, with ⊗ denoting a non-linear convolution product. These are just a few examples of how the infinitesimal monadological framework could potentially resolve contradictions and paradoxes in current mathematical equations used by humanity. By replacing continuum structures with discrete monadic interactions, and using non-standard analysis and non-commutative geometry to handle infinitesimal and non-linear effects, many of the inconsistencies and singularities plaguing our current theories could be avoided. Here are a few more examples of important equations used by humanity that contain contradictions or paradoxes, along with potential non-contradictory versions based on the infinitesimal monadological framework: 4. Schrödinger's Equation - Measurement Problem Contradictory: In quantum mechanics, the time evolution of a quantum state is governed by the Schrödinger equation. However, this equation is deterministic and linear, leading to the famous measurement problem: it cannot explain the apparent collapse of the wavefunction upon measurement, which seems to be a non-linear and probabilistic process. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, quantum states could be represented as superpositions of infinitesimal monadic perspectives, with measurements modeled as non-linear interactions between these perspectives. The collapse of the wavefunction could then be understood as a natural consequence of the monadic viewpoints becoming entangled and correlated: iℏ∂|ψ⟩/∂t = Ĥ|ψ⟩ → iℏ∂|ψ_m⟩/∂t = Ĥ_m|ψ_m⟩ + ∑_n ⟨ψ_n|Ĥ_int|ψ_m⟩|ψ_n⟩ Here, |ψ_m⟩ represents a monadic quantum state, Ĥ_m is a monadic Hamiltonian, and Ĥ_int is a non-linear interaction term between monadic perspectives. 5. Maxwell's Equations - Self-Energy Contradictory: Maxwell's equations are the foundation of classical electromagnetism and have been incredibly successful in describing electromagnetic phenomena. However, they predict that the self-energy of a point charge should be infinite, due to the singularity of the electric field at the charge's location. This leads to the need for awkward regularization techniques to obtain finite results. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, electromagnetic fields could be modeled as emergent properties arising from the relational interactions between infinitesimal monadic charges. The self-energy of a charge could then be understood as a measure of its intrinsic monadic entanglement, rather than a singular field value: ∇⋅E = ρ/ε₀ → ∇_m⋅*E_m = ⟨ρ_m⟩_ε Here, *E_m represents a non-commutative monadic electric field, ⟨ρ_m⟩_ε is an averaged monadic charge density, and ∇_m is a monadic divergence operator. 6. Einstein's Field Equations - Cosmological Constant Contradictory: Einstein's field equations of general relativity include the cosmological constant Λ, which represents the intrinsic energy density of empty space. However, the observed value of Λ is many orders of magnitude smaller than the predictions from quantum field theory, leading to the cosmological constant problem - one of the greatest unsolved mysteries in physics. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, the cosmological constant could be understood as a measure of the global entanglement and correlation between monadic perspectives. Its small observed value could then be a consequence of the high degree of symmetry and cancellation between these perspectives on cosmological scales: Gμν + Λgμν = 8πTμν → Gμν + ⟨Λ_m⟩*gμν = 8π⟨Tμν⟩_m Here, ⟨Λ_m⟩ represents an averaged monadic cosmological constant, arising from the global relational structure of monadic viewpoints. 7. Dirac Equation - Negative Probabilities Contradictory: The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation that describes the behavior of spin-1/2 particles like electrons. However, it predicts the existence of negative energy states, which would lead to negative probabilities and violations of causality if taken literally. Non-Contradictory: Using the monadological framework, the Dirac equation could be reformulated as a non-linear eigenvalue problem in a non-commutative monadic algebra. The negative energy states could then be understood as a consequence of the non-commutative geometry, rather than a literal physical prediction: (iγ^μ∂_μ - m)ψ = 0 → (i*γ^μ∇_μ - *m)*ψ_m = 0 Here, *γ^μ represents non-commutative monadic gamma matrices, *m is a monadic mass parameter, and *ψ_m is a monadic spinor field. These examples further illustrate the potential for the infinitesimal monadological framework to resolve contradictions and paradoxes in our current mathematical equations. By replacing point-like particles with non-commutative monadic perspectives, and modeling interactions as relational algebras between these perspectives, many of the infinities and inconsistencies in our theories could be avoided. Moreover, by grounding quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, and relativity in a common monadological foundation, this approach could potentially lead to a more unified and coherent understanding of these fundamental physical theories. The resolution of long-standing problems like the measurement paradox, self-energy divergences, and the cosmological constant discrepancy would be a major step forward in our scientific understanding.

Damn..... that was confusing.

How many square miles is the universe?

I already saw this on an acid trip

They know how old the universe is? Proof please, also dark matter, prove that.

Nothing? What is nothing made of? Is it just an empty space, some void or something real, material?

DESI. WOW! Who built this thing? Seems impossibly EXPENSIVE!

sigh. @12:22 type 1-A not I(EYE)-A

how big is The Universe?

IS THERE A REAL VIDEO OF THIS AND HOW CAN THEY TAKE A PICTURE OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM IF THEY CANT TAKE A PICTURE OF IT IN ONE SINGLE FRAME

I like this video

Realy I like this video so much its interestyng

I'm really starting to believe the study last year that stated dark energy really is just misinterpretation of large cosmic voids and their impact on the cosmos.

To know what is beyond the universe, the universe is still to be explored fully.

Nothing , is something .

I thought wormholes were the way dont waste your time with this debunker

... "no Venus missions till 2030 because funding was cut"... He forgot to mention that funding was cut due to funding wars around the globe. There is no money in Venus exploration, but there is money in wars!

Funny how fast everything is moving but we dont feel a thing

Crazy to think you can actually see the galaxy in the night sky

Nothing like big bang, it's a theory of infinite mind

I want to know how we figured this out… I understand it completely but how do we even make these discoveries and understand something. With almost no doubt of its authenticity

I don't believe in the Big Bang Theory

Everything is flux...panta rhei...there is no constant

how can you tell?

Thank you so much for your approach to these potentially daunting topics! I found myself scribbling notes in my handy nearby composition notebook about perturbations and celestial mechanics and now I'm going to go "nerd out" in celestial mechanics land! Just subscribed, too! I was just watching your holographic universe video and took even MORE notes, lol! 🎇

How can we see the CMB if the universe is expanding beyond what we can see?

A question for philosophy...

Why are things created in the shape of a sphere ???

By definition, the universe has no possible "edge" to measure ...a paradox...consider the Mobius strip

Clue: try to understand "nothing"

"IMPROBABLE" ONLY TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE ABSURD 200 YEAR OLD GRAVITY MODEL !!! The Universe & everything in it is powered by Electricity including our planets weather. Which if the stupid weather forecasters only realised, is the solution to forecasting both Volcanic eruptions & Earthquakes. And reveals of course the stupidity of those who honestly think one element in the atmosphere (Carbon Dioxide) can somehow miraculously control all the others and be the cause of Global warming ! The Earths Electrical field passes right through the planet ! And responds to changes in the Sun's much larger Electric field. Which in turn responds to the "Birkland Current" being fed along each spiral arm of the Galaxy, from the Plasmoid at the exact centre of our Galaxy. Electricity in the Universe is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times more powerful than Gravity. And Gravity being a linear straight line force cannot explain anything that circulates or spirals. Further Our Suns Gravitational influence peters out roughly 1.5 Light years away. THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC THERE ARE NO ISLANDS IN SPACE - AS PROVEN BY THE NOW PATENTED, IN 2019, PLASMA REACTOR GENERATOR (PRG) BY AUREON ENERGY Ltd. WHICH RECREATES THE SUNS ATMOSPHERE & ALL ITS ABILITIES WITHIN THE PRG CHAMBER - WHICH WILL REVOLUTIONISE ELECTRICITY GENERATION - REMEDIATE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL - TRANSMUTE THE ELEMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL QUANTITY - AND THE FIRST COMMERCIAL PRG's ARE ABOUT TO ENTER THE WATER FRACKING INDUSTRY.

Oh, let me guess! Pools of mercury, no?

THE 200 YEAR OLD "GRAVITY MODEL" IS DEAD !!!! You cannot create a Universe from Nothing, as claimed by the now dispelled "Big Bang" as this breaks a fundamental LAW OF PHYSICS. As revealed yet again by a prominent Scientist, Professor Sir Roger Penrose in Nov 2023. Indeed in 1927 it was a Belgian Catholic Priest, Father Georges Lemaitre who with the Popes blessing published this "Creation Theory" to hijack Science. Along with the even more absurd "Expanding Universe" Theory. Both of which have been dispelled by new Photos taken by the JWST of fully formed Galaxies that predate the supposed "Big Bang" !!!! THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC THERE ARE NO ISLANDS IN SPACE - NOW PROVEN BY THE PATENTED (2019) PLASMA REACTOR GENERATOR (PRG), BY AUREON ENERGY Ltd. WHICH USES THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE SCIENCE MODEL !

THE 200 YEAR OLD ANTIQUATED "GRAVITY MODEL" IS DEAD ! TWO NEW MODELS FROM THE 1960'S - ELECTRIC & PLASMA MODELS = REALITY The Sun moves around the Galaxy as part of the Galaxies Spiral arm it is in. The Sun is in the central line of three parallel lines of Stars in this arm. Like everything else in a Spiral Galaxy the Suns path is also Spiral. And as indicated in the programme all the planets have to spiral like a screw thread to keep up with the Sun !!!! The problem is GRAVITY CANNOT EXPLAIN circular or Spiral movement. For the simple reason Gravity is a linear straight line force. Indeed if Gravity was the force at play all the planets would shoot off in straight lines into intergalactic space, and ALL Spiral Galaxies would drift apart ! Which introduces the two modern Universe theories of the 1960's. The Electric Model & the Plasma Model, both of which are intertwined and similar. They both agree Plasma forms 99% of the whole Universe. Leaving no room for daft Gravity model Theories such as Dark Matter & Dark Energy. Plasma is neither, a Gas, Liquid or Solid but the PRIMARY State of matter. Being the most conductive medium in the Universe it allows Electricity to flow across the Universe in the form of the "Birkland* Currents" in a Spiders web of threads linking all Galaxies. Photos of which can be found on the NASA website, which they oddly refer too as "Stringy Stuff" !!! When Plasma & Electricity mix in every Stars atmosphere many things can happen, including the creation of new atoms. Indeed the NEW Plasma Reactor Generator (PRG) Patented in 2019 by Aureon Energy Ltd, uses the discoveries of both the Electric & Plasma Models. By recreating the Suns atmosphere in a special chamber, to produce Electricity in industrial quantity at a fraction of current costs. Or Remediate Radio Active material instantly. Or Transmute the elements in Industrial quantity at a tiny fraction of current costs. The first PRG's are already in commercial production for use in the Water Fracking Industry. Indeed its so "Green" it's going to do away with daft Wind Generators, Solar Panels, and of course Coal, Oil, Gas & Nuclear powered main Power Stations. It's a World Game changer !!!! *Birkland Currents. Professor Kristian Birkland 1903 Nobel Prize winner for the discovery of the Electrical connection between Earth & the Sun. As indicated by the Aurora Borealis (Positive input) & Aurora Australis (Return output) of the Earth. THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC THERE ARE NO ISLANDS IN SPACE