came across this in my junior year in college, was really inspired and I actually decided to do a master in machine learning because of this. Thank you Mr.Norvig!
@cashapp_free_money3 місяці тому
Obsessed is a word the lazy use.
@tingsun55475 місяців тому
great talk
@Dylan-st8vq6 місяців тому
hell yeah
@albertusivanwijaya7776 місяців тому
third
@Lucretia90007 місяців тому
Hang on, he voted for putin's puppet?
@desmondliu927511 місяців тому
Hey, Murray Goldberg! He was my CPSC-315 instructor. Great teacher. I liked his operating systems class.
@icantollieРік тому
Coolest ACM A. M. Turing Award laureate ever
@icantollieРік тому
“Don't sacrifice your salary for your ‘incredibly valuable’ stock ’cause, you know, that may not work” = most practically useful quote of the lecture lol
@raderatorРік тому
So this guy voted from Biden. Ha! I'm smarter than him.
@DreddwinnerРік тому
🤎💜
@babeslashРік тому
Why is Walter white teaching Microprocessor. I thought he was a chemistry teacher
@Jun_17103Рік тому
hell yeah
@CostumeJewelryHomeРік тому
Can you share the algorithm and code?
@danialramzanРік тому
second
@jamaicaigot9335Рік тому
Awesome vid! could you get the audio version of it on audea? I listen to most of my audio there would love to hear this on there!
@chauhansairaj3663Рік тому
Hell yeah
@saifuddinrajaРік тому
this is so underrated , needs more views
@victordsouza1042 роки тому
good
@ElenaZelena2 роки тому
Walter White
@564blablk2 роки тому
Walther White shaved and got into computer science
@babeslashРік тому
WW is already bald
@videoexcursions97082 роки тому
Great video! one thing though, I believe Mr Patterson actually drank out of someone else's water bottle!
@tomtremaine44522 роки тому
timing attacks 20:10
@neogen232 роки тому
59:10 is a typical "I bet you say that to all the girls" moment :)
@wenyujiang52342 роки тому
no sound
@eschewary3672 роки тому
Great video, you should have thrown in some clips of Ski Stunt!
@Technoid_Mutant2 роки тому
I'm pretty surprised that this has only 800 likes. This is good information.
@julianskidmore293Рік тому
It's good, but it's very specialised. It's like asking how many copies of "Computer Architecture: A Quantitive Approach" have been bought (I have Edition 2, which I bought in 1996). It's never been a huge best-seller, because it's so specialised and most computing types (especially, ironically, hardware people), don't tend to care about computer architecture. Nevertheless, it's one of the most influential computing books of all time, because the right people have copies and they've put the ideas into practice for the benefit of all of us. Anyway, 1.3K likes so far!
@radivojevasiljevic3145Рік тому
@@julianskidmore293 I sometime think that 2nd edition nailed it and that it is best of all editions. Newer editions have newer examples, but sadly some things were moved to appendix.
@skm88382 роки тому
Nice
@fredsands74372 роки тому
Hello Mr. Patterson it's Aleisha Holt or Angel Olsen I'm still here ,no one is going brak my stride ... What does Google mean the circle ...
@fredsands74372 роки тому
Damian Marley life is a circle ⭕
@jklappenbach2 роки тому
Moore's Law is not dead. By any stretch of the imagination. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/p3l4bbCriK1jqJc.html We will eventually hit the end of the road for Si based fab, but by then something new will inevitably be developed.
@dakshvats42842 роки тому
hell yeah
@mahkhi71542 роки тому
You're copying those big guys out there. The problem you got is those big guys aren't gonna tell you their Trade secrets. Did you tell of your Jujutsu.
@crhu3192 роки тому
Had Motorola not been late with 68000, AI would already have killed us all. But also solved climate change.
@crhu3192 роки тому
Fred Brooks Jr gave a talk at SIGGRAPH once. He apologized for creating a notation that had syntactic significance for spaces...
@JD-kf2ki3 роки тому
Please do at least 1080p. We're about to end the second decade of the 21st century.
@MaxPrehl2 роки тому
At least they got a decent mic on him. (those cuts to the audience mic aren't great tho)
@suntzu14092 роки тому
Yeah plus 720p would have been fine if slides were bigger But they arent
@AlexRyan3 роки тому
Even the Hollywood liberals don’t love the smell of their own farts as much as this obnoxious midget. Would someone please teach him the virtue of “humility” and to shut the fuck up about his Turing award?
@airavercetti12323 роки тому
Well it is a pitty we haven't a clear picture of jan
@77Shiloh73 роки тому
I knew Billy as a child.In the 1960's. Lost track of him as an adult. He would come and visit his Grandmother in Los Angeles, Anna O'Reilly. She was our next door Neighbor. They would stay the weekend . And, as Children will do, I would wander next door and play with Billy and his sister Kathleen. I just recently heard of his passing . God's peace wished to the Aeillo Family and also condolences at the passing of Billy's Dad, Frank Aiello. ' Memories Matter.'
@discodave45003 роки тому
this guy is a fraud and a shill for AI.
@granthutchison57113 роки тому
Excellent presentation and post session discussions. Integrating CS into other subjects and improving existing CS electives in K-12 are both excellent initiatives to improve overall learning goals. The key takeway for me is the triangle of pedagogy, tool, and curriculum and transfer from coding to subject area and transfer within CS electives and into post secondary programs of study.
@granthutchison57113 роки тому
I am using CMU CS Academy this year with my Introductory CS program and it has a fundamentally different approach that "if done well" can achieve important learning goals including rigour (many test cases), modularity, explanations of project design and implementation, but I would definitely not say that CMU CS Academy would be a good tool for learning Math or other subject areas.
@parrotraiser65413 роки тому
Anybody developing a system should know at least something about the fields above and below (or before and after, depending on how you visualise processing stacks) their area. A software person needs to know something about the problem domain and about hardware. The hardware types need to understand software and materials science, and so on.
@lordmushroom723Рік тому
Agree 100%
@amedvedev3 роки тому
Thanks a lot! Amazing lecture. Explains a lot about m1 from apple and trends in future cpu for servers today
@apivovarov23 роки тому
@32:16. About ARM. Chromebooks and MacBooks M1 are ARM64. Amazon AWS has ARM64 based EC2 servers. ARM64 is gradually replacing x86_64.
@bnsonline50993 роки тому
I think in the same way, ARM is growing very fast and RISC-V too.
@qqryqq1233 роки тому
@@bnsonline5099 ARM is IP. As soon as RISC-V "matures" companies will jump on it and ARM might be in trouble. Not going to happen overnight but it's certainly closer than it was a few years ago.
@madmotorcyclist2 роки тому
@@bnsonline5099 RISC-V has one disadvantage. Because their licensing allows developers/manufacturers to add hardware extensions there will be incompatibilities that the 86x systems did not have. ARM doesn't have that issue. Also at the moment RISC-V is more power hungry for less performance than ARM chips now (~2-4 years behind).
@kayakMike10002 роки тому
Specifically it's I think it's called aarchv8-a
@kayakMike10002 роки тому
@@madmotorcyclist well .... If you're a developer, you could interrogate the risc-v hart for any built-in extensions when your program starts... You could then fail fast with a reasonable error message OR fail over to emulation of the non standard instructions at a performance cost.
@fpgamadeeasy3 роки тому
Dear Electronic engineer, please subscribe to my channel.
@pablo_brianese3 роки тому
Beautiful work!
@pablo_brianese3 роки тому
39:45 You can bet Borges understood exponential growth, given he knew enough mathematics to understand the theory of transfinite numbers.
@youtubiuttoni3 роки тому
It’s been a little more than a year since this lecture and so much has changed already... CISC is practically doomed and RISC V keeps getting bigger and bigger...
@pentiumou89933 роки тому
i just read his book on hardware software interface and get to be familiar with RISC-V, and came here to view some videos on it and finally come across the inventor’s lecture on computer architecture, and find that RISC is in such a development process right now...
@cat-.-2 роки тому
RISC-V still a couple years behind AArch (when it comes to microarch) and it's like triple the price. That said, this RISCV is valuable beyond imagination and it's on the right track!
@suntzu14092 роки тому
"The longer the icon of RISC-V is on earth, the stronger it will become" "RISC-V's power double every year"
@mikafoxx27173 місяці тому
@@cat-.-Thing is, it's much like arm in the first place. It was small and efficient but powerful enough, but not enough, power came with time and need. Now just look at what apple is doing with M3, it's seriously competing favorably with x86 and much more efficient. Risc-V will take time to get the high performance cores developed and desire to do so, which isn't hard considering it's free to use.
@cat-.-3 місяці тому
@@mikafoxx2717 I hope! But I don't see how, without major commercial adoption, RiscV could compete with arm and x86 in terms of uarch development. Vendors are very secretive and protective of their uarch. Oh, and, besides, it's becoming increasingly clear that we need a open ISA for GPU compute as well!
@roaaalsadeq35303 роки тому
hello..can you help me to translate code from C language to RISC-V? أعجبني تعليق مشاركة
@fpgamadeeasy3 роки тому
Dear Electronic engineer, please subscribe to my channel.
@roberthindle51462 роки тому
GCC
@KT-dj4iy3 роки тому
I hate to admit, but I chose option E (and that's despite having a degree in Physics, albeit from *long* ago). But something curious arose as a result. After I realized I was wrong, I "simulated" the activity in my head; that is, I imagined me performing the experiment, swinging the ball and then letting go with the (imaginary) intent of hitting a target I could see outside my window. Curioously I found myself letting go at the correct position -- i.e. the one that would result in me hitting my imaginary target. So it seems that although "I" , the *thinking* me, got it wrong, "I", the *doing* me got it right. The truth was within me, as it were. No idea what if anything that has to do with concept inventories, but it was interesting nevertheless.
@bitflogger3 роки тому
I'm not convinced that Neural Networks are THE answer to AI. Adding massive computer power does not mean anything if its not the answer.
@arunavaghatak62813 роки тому
Me too. Neural networks are not as data efficient as the human brain is. We need some radically different architecture for AI.
@bitflogger3 роки тому
@@arunavaghatak6281 Radical? How about zeros and ones, and Xs?
@schumachersbatman50943 роки тому
@@arunavaghatak6281 But the brain is made of neural networks right? I don't really understand this criticism. People skeptical of neural networks, do they have a narrow definition of neural networks they don't like, one that excludes the biological brain? Or are they critiquing neural nets writ large, all variants, including 'graph neural networks' and other artificial models, as well as the human brain itself?
@youtubiuttoni3 роки тому
@bitflogger why not? They may not be YET. What’s the difference between artificial intelligence and intelligence? Neural networks are exactly what gave birth to intelligence in the first place...
@bitflogger3 роки тому
@@youtubiuttoni Nural Networks are an abstraction of the real thing. A good enough abstraction? I assume it would get better with time, but would it ever become good enough? I've read the NN go back 30 years, not yet? 30 years from now, not yet? Seems like fusion tech.