Two questions.. 🤔..Where did Otta Benga acquire a firearm and who 'gave' it him????? 🤨 ..I bet it was those same derelict people who profited from their 'misinformation '.
@Vernon-ChitlenДень тому
John 1:1-3 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (2) He was in the beginning with God. (3) All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made Words are information, information is invisible, non material and without mass. We know it exists because of it's influence on matter and energy.If anything can be eternal it would be Information. We know mass and energy had a beginning. Jesus is the eternal Word.
@rubiks6День тому
"Intelligent Design" is not the full reality. It is a pale shadow of that reality. Unless you come to know the Intelligent *_Designer,_* you fall far short of reality. Jesus Christ is the Intelligent Designer.
@blairfranklin7320День тому
This is sickening
@DrHakimullahKhaksarДень тому
Best video
@throckmortensnivel28502 дні тому
Apparently Mr. Wells hasn't got the memo yet from Answers in Genesis. They claim evolution happens very rapidly. The reason for their claim is that it's been pointed out to them the ark was nowhere near big enough to accomodate two animals of every species. They've decided that there wasn't two of every species, but only two of every "kind". Then they have to explain all of the extant species on earth now, only 4500 years after the biblical flood. So they're saying evolution happens very rapidly. Perhaps Mr. Wells should get in touch with them to sort this out.
@GODs_Son7772 дні тому
Smh
@user-ql5nn6cm3h2 дні тому
They still can’t figure out the living cell
@anthonycarbone38262 дні тому
This podcast is a perfect example of information that needs a very detailed video. It loses too much in just a verbal explanation. A 30 to 60 minute video is needed just as a beginning and an in depth video would need to be compared side by side to a human designed motor.
@vasiliostheodorou48492 дні тому
We can hypothesise that if information stops to exist then intelligence design becomes extinct evolution. If information is zero then intelligent design never existed like in space where information is vacant or not. In other words God is less present in space than on Earth where information is abandant.
@andrewthomas63123 дні тому
Great video. I'd recommend adding closed captions, but they don't seem to be available. Thanks for sharing this with us !
@BoydWaters3 дні тому
Legendary and I owe so much to him for the elementary electronics lessons.
Is this just a "proof by incredulity"? I mean we have mathematical proofs that show any event, no matter how improbably, will approach an absolute certainty of occuring given enough samples. Weve had billions of years of random interactions of molecules in a liquid soup allowing for a practically inconceivable amount of samples of molecular interaction/change, and with the aid of selective pressures causing an increased probability for more capable molecular structures, this gives a lot (i mean a lot, like a million years is practically negligible compared to a billion which again we have multiple of in this time frame) of probabilistically biased samples allowing for the occurence of such machines. Engineers are even using such theories/ideologies now through things like evolutionary algorithms, whereby they create such seemingly "fine tuned" highly complex structures that can accomplish a multitude of complex tasks through a simulation of the processes of evolution in which they have little to no direct interaction with the specification of such aeemingly "perfect" resulting structures. Also, it seems like an "intelligent designer" creates more questions than it answers. Like we know how chemical processes and statistics work or at least have seemingly very accurate models for how they work, but by just hand waving away these things in lieu of an ill defined "intelligent designer" just seems to push the question and add some more. Who created them, what are they like, etc? I mean, I don't want to offend but if their description is based on the scriptures of the most popular religions today, then the descriptions are rife with self contradictions and apparent falsehood when looking at how the world operates.
@SmokingJoe623 дні тому
The evidence of intelligent design in both the genome & many micro organisms is fast becoming irrefutable. As to the source of such ‘intelligence’ I’ll leave it to the theologians to fight amongst themselves
@mjazzguitar3 дні тому
Did the very first cell that is the ancestor of every living thing on the planet have these? If not, how did it move things around and how did incremental mutations create something this complex? If so, how did something that complex come together by accident?
@josephthybrother95343 дні тому
How can it be from the gradualism of evolution, when all the parts have to be present for it to work
@diekstra8973 дні тому
Wow!
@realityishardtodigest91283 дні тому
Lol. I so badly wish Charles Darwin comes back alive and starts to speak to Dawkins.
@brianhayden35093 дні тому
It's probably an upload which would greatly benefit from added animation as it's arguably way too specialised/ high level for 'lay listeners' to grasp.
@howardrobinson49383 дні тому
But most amazingly is the cell mechanism that generates the crappy music that accompanies cellular functions. Anyway, the music makes you want to believe and the computer generated cartoon makes you want to believe. The chemical reactions occur. This is known. But how? Very unknown. That little cartoon two-stepping thing is just an animation of the most basic of steps in that particular chemical function. You can just as well apply it to any process that involves two steps.
@abdelkarimalailou493 дні тому
God existed before He created creatures, yes or no? Yes. God was not created, He is the Creator, yes or no? Yes. Was time created, yes or no? Yes. God is not concerned with the time He created, God existed and time did not exist, yes or no? Yes. God created Space (places, directions), yes or no? Yes. As God is not concerned with the time He created, He is not concerned with the space He created. Even scientific atheists know that space and time are inseparable.
@imaw8ke3 дні тому
What a great thumbnail....
@avi8r663 дні тому
Sorry, but what has been found and confirmed does not verify the 'truth' of the bible. It does corroborate some notable names, like Pilate and Herod, but not Jesus. Nor does it do anything to confirm the supernatual events (miracles, resurrection, flood, etc). And Jewish archaeologists have been trying for a very long time to find good evidence for the events of the exodus story and so far have found nothing. Were there hebrews living in Egypt controlled areas? yes. Were some slaves? Yes. Did 2million+ escape at one time and wander the desert? No evidence to support this at all. Maybe stop trying to get science to confirm your claims, it's not going to happen. If you want to believe ancient myths it is fine, just stop trying to get people to view them as true.
@kpkpm36043 дні тому
John Lennox believed that the universe had a beginning before scientists believed it. A god created it. Great. The ancient Greek believed that when they saw lightning and heard thunder it is because Zeus was angry. Same thing. "God did it" is always the lazy answer.
@Richard-darixdax3 дні тому
I can't believe that people can't see the truth. God exists!
@SmokingJoe624 дні тому
Absolutely fascinating and I love how Dr Meyer explains the science in a language I can understand.
@odesseus4 дні тому
Discovery Institute pushes the pseudoscience of "intelligent design," a false term used to disguise the idea is based in religion. Being skeptical is fine. Casting aside scientific study because your religious beliefs are more important than reality isn't being skeptical, it's being foolish.
@infinitewisdom45574 дні тому
The truth will indeed set you free.... We can't observe everything but what we can observe is precisely that and nothing else.... so please don't tell me what YOU think it is, let IT tell me what it is!
@refuse2bdcvd3244 дні тому
Chemistry requires intelligence. Darwin's hypothesis has nothing to contribute to chemistry.
@rickysicks665 днів тому
oh yeah? this is still in the subconscious minds of a lot of people and systematically interwoven into a lot of institutions and laws
@zeroonetime5 днів тому
Everything I.S. being formed. i.e. Creation in Action.
@zeroonetime5 днів тому
I.S. = Information System = Infinity Squared. Of course everything I.S. being formed. Quantum mechanics form Entropy. Everything, born and die instantaneously in no Time at all, forming the Timing of everything at 10nce, in T.E.N./The Eternal Now 010 dimensions. Time run-over Timing. Timing 01 Electromagnetism of dualistic universe. 010
@gicfa775 днів тому
i agree and it's almost related to 'Propaganda'...
@anthonycarbone38265 днів тому
My main metric would always be how much the students learned and how does that compare to normal High School Chemistry classes. It is not just checking the boxes but making sure the student is ready and able to advance their knowledge in that subject area. For anyone interested in chemistry the beginning class is the foundation for any person to be interested in pursuing that subject further in the future and maybe make their career in that field.
@lvirden5 днів тому
The statistics are a bit odd...why so much 89% and what steps are to be taken to raise those short falls
@lvirden5 днів тому
Did you make use of the resources by the American chemical society, designed for use for the age range of your students? Also you might see if they have forums for teachers to discuss material, new websites, etc.? There might even be grants.
@refuse2bdcvd3245 днів тому
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
@user-qs7vl3zi7o5 днів тому
Gratitude abounds in this comments section. The wonder child inside each individual is filled with joy!
@hearttouchingnasheed-xx6ey5 днів тому
If there was no background music, it wouldn't be disturbing to hear.
@_k3anzo5 днів тому
Lmao shout out to my english teacher, this is the topic for my speech
@AMC22836 днів тому
the thumbnail image says it all
@peterruh606 днів тому
E/acc movement should be all over this.
@duncanmountford84266 днів тому
As a physicist, my understanding is that in general random processes don’t produce order. The complexity in the cellular molecular machines is astonishing. Could random processes ever produce something this complex? Science doesn’t have an explanation.
@SnoopyDoofie6 днів тому
Was too techy for my taste.
@cubuffs20286 днів тому
In the beginning was the logos… all things were made through him (logos) … Information precedes everything else! God = Jesus = information = the truth (this part’s a little tougher to wrap my head around… maybe change a couple of equals to set inclusion?)
@yngvesognen10926 днів тому
My dad was also a pharmacologist!
@deevillarreal94757 днів тому
I think it's pretty disgusting that despite Got telling us we are created in his image we insist on giving into man's redicules hoax, no doubt for the all mighty dollar, even on Darwin's death bed when asked why he spent so much of his life relentless in trying to convince man of evolution, his answer he did not want to owe thanks to anyone, he was caught over and over again falsifying trying to process paper in order to look aged, lots of trickery . The truth is the truth, you don't have to be caught numerous times falsifying so much just to not have to owe God thanks. Narcissist to say the very least. Shame on mans attempts to disprove our Creator, leave it to man that also didn't want to thank God for anything adopt his stupidity. Disgrace to our Marvelous Creater. 🙏🏽 Man with a potion of ape . Good grief just fall for anything. Insult to our intelligence, know doubt Satan also had a hand in turning man away from the importance of our heavenly father. Shameful.
@throckmortensnivel28507 днів тому
Obviously someone who has not read any Stephen Jay Gould. Evolution can happen slowly, or more rapidly, bearing in mind what is meant by "more rapidly". We are talking about geologic time. There is no contradiction between "punctuated equilibrium", and evolution by tiny steps. The fossil record is what it is. When one considers that in the vast majority of cases, organisms do not leave a fossil record, finding a fossil is a minor miracle in itself. In the vast majority of cases the organism disappears without a trace. Of those organisms that did leave a fossil record, they might be at the bottom of the ocean, where they will never be found, at the tops of mountains where they're unlikely to be found, or the remains may be so badly damaged as to be unrecognizable. Again, the finding of any fossil is a minor miracle. At the same time, fossils are not the only evidence for evolution. There is DNA in every living thing, and it can be used to determine the relationship of one species to another. Denying evolution isn't just a matter of questioning the fossil record. Denying evolution means denying all science. Geology, genetics, biochemistry, physics, and all the various branches of those sciences confirm evolution over and over again.