Thank god for the Foxbat. It scared the US so much they made the legendary F-15

bombardier was waving around its wallet in the alley when tptb conspired and jumped them in the alley and stole the c series

Someone tell me please what is the song starting at 24:00 .

Luar biasa mig RUSSIA,,, US menuduh China mencuri data teknologi pesawat silumannya tapi data paling tepat US mencuri teknologi RUSSIA secara licik.😂😂 Karena Amerika frustasi tidak bisa menandingi RUSSIA pada jamannya 🤣🤣🤣

❤✈️❤❤✈️❤❤🌠❤🌇❤🌈❤🌧️🔯..💧✈️.. M i g. - 25 Mig - 25 the - king Of in erceptors' 👑 382. 🗣️👥 K...ציפיות ..לפני. ✈️✈️✈️🌠 K . Skyshlps' eng ח ו ד ש , 🌟255 skshi

#Skyships flying Vespa?🤣

brings back memories

My uncle was a fire control officer on the YF-12. He had some great stories.

My origins🤯😳

Although slightly unusual configuration by today's standards it looks so modern with two engines on the tail that it's easy to forget that it was among the very first jet airliners to take to the sky.

That’s a C-133

Please tell who made the engine of this plane???sukoi or mig company

Who made the ingine of this plane ,the body made by USSR what about the ingine?

Employment traps .even after resigning !

Everywhere the superiority ..... Now even street hawkers have televisions and mobiles though not telephones ... Everyone has the liberty to view thier choice of television shows .....and .....street hawkers have cctv cameras so ..... who is watching whom ?? Only god knows ?

The PC-12 looks like a pretty good duck buster for frequent puddle jumping.

Ansett New Zealand (not Air NZ) had these aircraft and were nick named Whisper Jets because they were so quiet. Travelled many times on them and they were great from my regional perspective.

I was gonna ask why the Douglas C-133 was retired and the smaller C-130 Lockheed Hercules wasn't ! But I read the comments and didn't know about the structural problems of the C-133s. Too bad had the 133s not had them, then it could have been the C-130 retiring in Arizona instead!

7 GENERATION.

I think the Army is shying away from variant attack helicopters because of what it learned in Vietnam (namely that big slow-moving targets with lots of guns draw lots of fire) , and what it eventually got out of the programs that led to the Apache. But the Comanche program has never went into production beyond experimental, and because it's a stealth-recon-attack copter, it's not really as capable as the Apache when it comes to muscle, nor does it innovate in terms of speed because it is a traditional helicopter, nor can it compete with the costs and supply of swarm of scout drones with its sweet sensor array that was state of the art in yesteryears of development. (So the 'helicopter of the future' when I was a boy, doesn't seem to be fated for success because of the pace of innovation, and changes in warfare. I think currently it's the Invictus program which may or may not give up the traditional helicopter design, and either way, that thing is going to replace light scout helicopters if it ever goes into production, (a role that was had by another retired helicopter in order to keep the Apachee going, I think,) and that's if it doesn't get outpaced and outpriced by drone development--which is likely. And Congressional committee meetings can be like CHOOSE TO KEEP THIS PROGRAM, or THAT PROGRAM, you can't have BOTH! Especially during periods of rapid innovations.) So when it comes to pure muscle, the Army shouldn't be so quick to discount variants of the v-280 when it comes to potential capabilities. 1) Not only does that make it easier to service via mass production of most parts, it 2) allows you to replace 12 troops with a massive weapons bay for gunship, missile truck, mini-bomber, e-war, surveillance, or even less conventional roles (drone carrier, psyops, etc.) It might step on the air forces toes, or it might necessarily free them up for more air-dominance and strategic attrition warfare if the ARMY can master its own close air-to-ground-support roles with FAB capable weaponry especially if they get outside the nearly umbrella of NAVY or AIRFORCE support, or if either force has to prioritize its engagements along a vast front, or multiple fronts which can happen in peer 2 peer attrition style warfare. Joint command is one the areas where the USA is strongest, but in a big fight, that could go either way here or there, parts of the army could be cut off and isolated from the main force. Having something close by that can make a hole where you need a hole can be the difference between getting the troops you sent in to do a job back, or not. 3) Mass production means Congress (and the Military) gets more bang for the buck, especially over the long term. It means you can stock up when Congress is feeling generous, and strip birds for parts and keep the program going if/when they are making essential cutbacks. That's budgetary flexibility. 3) Having multi-role functionality means you can show your hand without necessarily revealing anything more than the back of your cards to your enemy. Even if they can see it, they don't know what its mission is, or what it is capable of, and there's essential fear-factor to that, especially as the numbers of the fleet increase. We should be thinking of this kind of bird as a platform, and not just a troop carrier. Like the Humvee, Bradley, or the more modern Striker. Don't just make it mission-capable, make it mission-essential, make it iconic, make it lethal & beloved by vets. That's what keeps Congress writing the checks for anything that gets to stay in service for decades.

ibuku muslim diah sakir ratu diah irianti born to me Raden Mohamad Mahfudin says udin eta ketek suma hoat junior region islam international shaolin kang lam ciu hiap mather ibu islam borobudur nabi Locu says lucu dengan sejarah legendary sword Kamsek Brave Wo Ai Ni Dixie John and nagapuspa sword 14 februari 1979 masehi 14 Maulud 1399 Gregorian Earth Hijriyah Rabu Kliwon neptu pasaran 15 time pukul 02:00 or 14:00 dini hari d day dooms day time zodiac aquarius shio Ram kambing unsur element Land Tanah wassalamu alaikum warohmatuAllah 41104 hi wabarokaatuh.

ukposts.info/have/v-deo/q6WdhqyJq5162Ww.html " most replayed"

What if it flys once again😅

Outstanding production video on the MiG-25

let's remind all..hehehe airbus ain't one country but collective effort of the best European economies ... hehehe just saying .. huge difference .. as for Yankeestan no they don't copy they just steal the best brains from allover .. yes the money is the sweetest trap ..

nice detailed video..hehehe thx..hehehe heavier means more fuel consumption ..hehehe higher means can in the future redesign & install bigger engines for longer hauls .. mistake done by Boeing & avoided by airbus ..hehehe just saying .. yes its first Chinese baby so can't criticize too much only congratulations on huge efforts & successful delivery hopefully ...hehehe just saying .. bravo

DC 10,MD 11 very safe,every crash is not because of them

Este interceptar fue una creación apurada para poder dar caza al avión espía SR71. Que es lindo ñ, es muy lindo, pero jamás pudo interceptar al avión espía para el que fue desarrollado. También comentar que a pleno empuje los reactores no soportaban más de un corto tiempo esa función, pasando a “ sobregirarse” y destruirse en pleno vuelo. Avión caro, complicado y muy mañoso para volar.

919 is expencive toy. If very confident, put Xi with CCP guys, No No No , Xi is too good for Maxico, Vietnam etc

misleading title !!!!! It might be the king of SOVIET interceptors because at that time "western" countries shifted to multirole jet concept while mig 25/31 was left alone as a dedicated INTERCEPTOR IN A VACUUM, glad it chewed a good chunk of the soviet military budget(which might have been spent on developing multirole jets) while having mediocre results during its lifetime :)

Rounded? Stop making stuff up man, nice vids but try to keep ur ideas to a min

💙🤍💙✈️💙💪🏽🔥💪🏽🌠🌇✈️🔯 🇮🇱 M i g. - 25 The king of. ✈️💙 🌟375. 👥👤.. 🌠. K.. לפני חודש. Interceptor.. 🌟 255. K . 🌠 Skyshi

I wonder how well these aircraft would have done if the engines were upgraded (maybe as other types who used this engine were) and a lifex were carried out.

I like this plane. Whoever built the fastest turboprop I do not know. Convair built the first turboprop, the XP81. And Convair also built a rather quick one called the XFY1 that cruised at 610 statute MPH.

When you need to take a giant step forward, you make new rules. Mach 1 had only just been achieved. English Electric built a mach 2+ interceptor that could be scrambled and up to height quicker than anything previously., based on the probable requirement at the time. It was complex and difficult to maintain and lacked endurance, but set new goalposts for the future. How many fighters are there that can exceed Mach 1 in a vertical climb even 60 years later?

MY SON FLIES HELICOPTERS, NICE, GLAD TO SEE BUILDING ON A SUCCESS. I HAVE LOOKED AT ALOT OF OUR WEAPONRY, NOT A FAR DEPARTURE FROM WEAPONS WE KNOW WORK. I AM GLAD TO SEE TAKING OUR MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY PLANES, TANKS, SHIPS, UPDATED AND IMPROVED. NEW AND IMPROVED, VASTLY IMPROVED. WORKS FOR ME. THIS CAN TAKE OFF AND LAND IN VERY SMALL SPACES, HAS IT'S PLACE IN MODERN WARFARE.

Wowskiovitch

and Dassault did create software suits to design their planes... that were adopted by many other industries

Mig 25 was a joke of antiquated engineering., as with almost everything the soviets and now the russians produce.

While watching a video about the woes of McDonnell Douglas I was surprised to hear that the F15 was their design.

Elvis’ bizjet is being turned into a bus. So sad

I still have the Gulfstream 2 brochure from its world demo flight.

This is the best content I've ever seen on the Foxbat and by far. All the essential ar here, also strategic and historical elements that help the viewer understand the ahead of their time tech solutions adopted in this jewel engineering and production. Full geopolitical and srategic scenario is pictured 360° and still no unnecessary blabla. Plus the text style, narrator voice and rithm, some irks and quirrks and funny facts make this content extremely enjoyable and never dull despite its length. It's definitely worth an instant subscrtiption P.S. kudos also for the brilliant and accurate pronounciation of russian words and names

Indonesia: buatan AsLi iNdOneSia

Only 250 produced S/N 1001 thru 1250. Perfect safety record. Flt 401 was crew inattention. The Saudi accident made it to the airport. The Delta accident was wind shear.

Worked on those at ATA. New to working on aircraft it was a bit overwhelming. Alot of redundency which made it a very safe aircraft Much better than the DC10 in my opinion.

Russia has srtong pilar in airflight industry .....high quality