Well said .A magic wand and a smile on his face . What a delightful person Roger is .

The GOAT ❤

stats define greatness.. love and popularity means nothing

@@djfunkychicken actually that's bs. Bird, Magic and MJ all get points in their greatness for what they did for the league. Nobody has had a greater impact on tennis that Fed. MJ gets tons of style points, Fed played the most beautiful tennis ever seen. No other player on earth could do what Fed did. Plus Fed's stats are damn near equal to Djoker. And the majority of players consider him the goat also.

​@@The-Dom players from team sports are not comparable with individual sports and Federer is no near equal to Djokovic The NBA MVP is chosen by media as is the Balon dOr in football.. Tennis uses stats to formulate the best.. WINNING is only what matters Novak has 115 more weeks at #1 and been 8 times the Year End #1.. That's 2 whole years more than Roger.. last time he was YE#1 was in 2009 !! Roger won 20 GS's out of 81 attempts (24%).. Novak won 24 out of 73 attempts (32%) Roger hasn't even held all 4 GS's at once Roger hasn't won all 9 Masters events.. he has 28 Masters titles while Djokovic has 40 The highest win% in tennis history: Novak Djokovic. Best single season and decade performance: Novak Djokovic. Most wins vs top 3.. top 5.. top 10: Djokovic If Roger had similar amount of records as Novak I'd agree with you but the reality is they are miles apart in terms of achievement

and now Fedtard is gone😂

​@djfunkychicken Stats are NOT enough to equate greatness in ANY field There are so many factors that you will DELIBERATELY ignore mentioning, which helped Djokovic succeed over Federer when it came to stats. 1. Every court on the professional tour became slower and slower which helped Djokovic's play-style over Federer'. Federer's Eastern-grip forehand and sheer racquet skills made him far, far, FAR superior to Djokovic on fast courts which became extinct in the last 7-8 years. If courts stayed relatively of the same fast-pace, Djokovic wouldn't have even ended the career with 15 grand slams. 2. Djokovic was at the mercy of a couple inches when it came to many of the wins he pulled off against Federer. For example, if Federer's 40-15 Wimbledon first-serve was only 2cm higher, he would've been the winner of Wimbledon by 3-1 sets. Similar situation to the US Open Grand Final match. Matter of fact is, luck gave Djokovic most of his wins over Federer.

Djoker will be most succesfull but roger is greatest Tennisskills ever he could do everything with his racket so the real greatest

@@GangstaphlipDjokovic is the greatest just admit that. But Federer created the most impact is also true

Greatest player is not defined by numbers. Roger times had different rules like five set, unlimited tie score etc.,. Nole's slams started to accumulate vigorously when Roger times already finished championing... If game includes mental strength, it also counts innovation, ethics and example of sportsmanship. Nole is a record chaser, not goat. But one of goats

Best player. Never greatest.

Winning is what matters most so yeah Djokovic is already the greatest. Federer can be considered as the best but not the greatest.

Like choking 40-15?

like choking match point

Many many things *nobody* cannot do on court like Fed.

Meehhhh... Djokovic and Federer faced each other 50 times, with Djokovic leading the head-to-head record 27-23, including 13-6 in finals. They played 17 matches at majors with Djokovic leading 11-6, five which were in finals and a record 11 in the semifinals.

that's Nadal

Very well said