I didn't disregard it at all. While it in no way made me realize what was actually going on, I found it really strange he'd just repeat what tyler said as if the doctor didn't just hear Tyler say it. Thought that would've/should've raised some red flags, but it didn't.

Didn't disregard it at all. It was subtle but we still doubt what the twist was. And our doubts were true. I was like, “i don't fucking know who is this guy's name” when he was about to reveal who Tyler Durden was.

Another good example, when he beats himself up in his boss's room and says "oddly enough, this reminds me of my fight with Tyler."

When I saw the first few blips of Tyler I knew he was a figment of his imagination and all of those small details confirmed it more and more throughout the film

marla saying “who are you talking to?”

Great point there

Me too lmao

Dead giveaway

There's also the part in the phone booth where the narrator calls Tyler Durden for the first time and the one on the phone asks "Who is this?" To which the narrator replies "Tyler". Obviously in the scene it's set up to seem like the narrator is asking if it's Tyler that he's speaking to but I find it to be pretty blatant hint with how they worded the exchange.

​@@HeyShay43I thought of the exact same thing watching the movie, great minds think alike

It’s even more relevant now imo.

Getting fresher day by day

Idk what you talking about

​@@jg41709I first watched it.... Wait when did this originally came out?!😂😂😂 I guess I'm old 😂

fr

It’s only becoming more relevant.

This movie is about an asshole with a office job, living in a nice apartment who likes to buy things; but he’s also a lunatic with a split personality of an anarcho-terrorist. Men embracing this movie and finding it thought provoking are blackpilled losers who’d rather burn down society than be a real man and endure suffering, love Jesus Christ and start families, or protect the families of others.

Yess! Finally someone said my words❤

marla is real 😭

@@doeatwhales Maybe, her reflection doesn't show in a mirror I believe...

@@jooliagoolia9959 ??😭 it’s not that deep she’s real. they literally get married in the sequel. also if she wasn’t real how does the space monkeys sees her and touch her? or even at the support groups ? people acknowledge her and the narrator at the same time not just one of them.

@@doeatwhales I have not seen a follow up movie... What is it called.

@@doeatwhales Interesting 🤔

What clue

If I were the parents I would be pissed off but with some pride

Agreeing with the acceptance part. To me, it seems these two opposite characters melt. Two extremes become balanced. With Tylers "activism" having the upper hand, or at least will have to be dealt with in some way. Love that movie.

@@Yggramuhl This is a trope in fiction. A man bifurcates his nature, with the "alter ego" he creates normally being a side of himself that had appeared to be more suppressed in him than in the average man. He soon discovers how dangerous this is. If he is able to reunite his selves he will be wiser and stronger than ever, after his experiences; but if he cannot disaster will ensue. Fight Club's is a very original take on this. I, and most people I think, had taken the Narrator's defeat/reconciliation with Tyler to be more happy and hopeful than not. It's clear that Palahniuk made Tyler an exceedingly well-balanced villain, whose madness was built around some cogent and important truths, so perhaps in the movie ending the Narrator would have been able to take mostly the meritorious, the wisdom, from him and his experience. It's clearly the tonally most straightforward reading of the ending. It is interesting to note that, even if you consider the Narrator's reconciliation to be mostly a defeat for Tyler, which again I don't see much hint otherwise after he crumples to the floor, the "happy, Hollywood" ending is actually far more socially subversive than the "darker, original" ending--hence the red Chinese restoring the original. It would be *exceeding* rare to see that in the case when the happiness is that of a protagonist who has just defeated the villain--which is another reason I favor that way to read the ending.

it's not just a trope in fiction. it's an aspect of jungian psychology known as shadow integration.

Oh my, I didn't noticed it's Jared

His first film was 1995…so, yeah…he was pretty new.

He was talking about the band

More than plausible. If, as this video also points out, Paper Street can't be a real place, then Marla, or any one else that comes to that house, can't be a real person either.

Spot on

yes, I enjoyed it

Me, too. I hope I can rewatch it with you

Maybe tomorrow?

okay, see you at 6pm

Tyler moment

I wouldn't compare it to taxi driver though too many differences

Wrong

Right

He knew! Or actually ground zero is just a common term for an explosion or disaster site.

​@@Bhamloud47Yes, its a common term. 9/11 is not the first time "ground zero " has been used in such context.

I think he was punching his leg.