and it's just an appetizer ;-)

They could have made at least one hour of those. The Maestro on his yard is simply the most magical thing tennis can offer. Fantastic video from the Wimby channel

And it's not really highlights; it's miraculous shots. A highlight reel like usually done would take hours and hours.

Master of the grass court

@Bobby Stocks Federer's arch rival is Nadal. Fed and Nadal are older.

Me neither. And I'll go further. I can't imagine anyone doing anything as beautifully as Roger played his greatest points. Well, in my field, classical music, there was Jascha Heifetz, the violin's GOAT. Maybe he had some moments at the Roger level.

Laver did

Nole Djocovic is the GOAT !!!!!!!!!

@@gregman1246 is he heck - hes got no real opposition but his time will be done soon. his recent results are due to having virtually no "real" opponents...

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 McDonalds will crush him.

yes on the old grass which they slowed down in 2002. And the fast court at us open which they slowed down towards end of 2000;s. Federer would almost be unstoppable. I think prime djokovic is maybe the only one that could beat him.

@@derrickc1353 not even prime Djokovic could stop him. By the time Djokovic started doing well on grass, Wimbledon courts were as slow as the clay at Roland Garros. Now it's a disgrace to old eras of fast grass courts. Federer is untouchable on even reasonably fast courts. Only age and slow courts were able to beat him. The slower courts brought extended baseline rallies. Fed grew up in a serve and volley era.

@@kwl189 I don't know. Djokovic never really played on grass when the courts were fast. Okay let's say slight edge to Federer at wimbledon. I do think with djokovic movement and speed that he would be ok on the old grass. What about australian open on the old green courts and Us open old courts. It would be close between those 2 very hard to tell. I do think Djokovic 15 is the only one who could stay with Federer under the old courts when they played quicker. Djokovic has an all-court game like Federer too. So hard to say. I give slight edge to Djokovic overall because he has a winning record against Nadal head to head and that includes clay court matches.

Sampras is beyond

@@kwl189 Pete sampras used to dominate on even faster courts than 2000's if that's the criteria, wimbledon slowed down the court speed in 2001 tournament.

Agreed .... wonderful to see 3 of the greatest for many years.

It’s just about speed and power or accuracy now. Boring to watch.

@@Stickybutton Not accuracy. Federer's time was more about accuracy

Yep, truly blessed to have been in the era of the Goat 3, but nothing can replace the game that Rog brought to the court, not rafa nor nole. There has never been a more satisfying tennis to watch than that of Roger.

Yes, Greatest Hand of All Time is spelt GHOAT, not GOAT.

True all-court ability

GOAT

Forgot to add: in the weakest era in the history of tennis 😉

@@Tennis_Expert do have a point. Players with just two shots. Nothing else.

Something in clay court ????????????? No !!!!😃😃😃😃

Never say never

@@monabuster312 never

People said the same thing about many players before, but he is certainly as good as anyone we've seen so far

Yessss espacialy in the clay court ……. 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪

But there is better than him

Basically, just what I came on here to say... I understand Djoko will end up with more majors, but prime compared to prime... No ONE was better than Federer....

Gracias Alex este video es una buena muestra de que ningún tenista a alcanzado la elegancia y efectividad que tubo Yocovit tiene 24 títulos de grand slam más que Federer pero este sigue siendo su majestad por su efectividad y elegancia Con sus virtudes y defectos para mi el mejor

To go further (and no one may even read this) Federer's backhand, finesse shots, deception, athletics... he was the total and complete package. Djoko basically wins on athletics and power. Total respect, but Federer was much more complete....

​​@@FinancialFreebopeak Djoko whether in 2011 or 2015 beats peak Federer. Fed definitely had 2nd highest peak besides Djoko.

​@@dimitrijespasic473not on grass

For real man.. what he did and the way he did it on the surface is insane. Shame how the courts have become less fast and allow for more baseline slugging.. literally what grass was known not to allow as much as other surfaces

Novak will get 9 wimbledons.

@@APRA30 Ah yes. When Djokovic is running through the Wimbledons, all sorts of conspiracy theories emerge.

@@jeffreycole2816 😂

@@ashb001 bro everyone knows that the courts have been homogenised since 2010

Rightly said..

We Will miss Roger on courte

@Rafa undisputed Goat Dare Novak

Novak Djokovic all the way.😊

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 well done, Nostradamus

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 loooooooooooooool

what about effortlessly effortless or effortlessly gracefully effortless?

😜😜😜

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Ar u listen about the 23 GRAND SLAM OF DJOKOVIC THE GOAT ????????????????

why do both Djokovic and Nadal have more GS titles if they are not better?

@@peterw8532 They are both mentally stronger especially Djokovic. Fed's only weakness was his mental game and confidence. In terms of pure tennis talent I agree with the op Roger is the best ever.

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 23>22>20. Novak is.

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 Hahaha. Keep clutching on straws.

Bret Hart, right?

It's such a shame that he blew it in the 2nd and 4th set against Del Potro in the 2009 US Open. He was 3-1 up in the 2nd set and he was 15/30 on Del Potro's serve at 4-5 and was 2 points away from is 16th Grand Slam and becoming the first man to win six consecutive US Open titles in the Open Era. He was also 2 points away from becoming the first man to win the Surface Slam and the first player to win the French Open, Wimbledon and US Open in the same calendar year since Rod Laver in 1969. He was all conquering but unfortunately since those moments a mental weakness developed and he struggled to win any further Grand Slams. He also never won a US open again. He should be the undisputed G.O.A.T but unfortunately he let so many critical break points and match points slip.

@Rafa undisputed Goat lol

Nole is GOAT !!!!!!!!!!!!

😜😜😜😜😜😜😜😜 Nole is GOAT !!!!!!!!!!!

the rally btwn him and dojo at the end was incredible!!

Carlos djoker 2023 finals gives hopes of matching the levels somewhat

🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪

@Rafa undisputed Goat Eat your words, and your repetitive comments, dude. I love Rafa, too, by the way.

Why didn't he win one more point, three times on his serve at 40-15 against Djokovic? Aren't those pure gold?

@@rafaundisputedgoat4291 McDonalds will kill him.

People that knew the game knew Federer was the favourite going into that Roddick match. It was just American media hyping up Roddick. Listening to Patrick McEnroe in those days was cringe worthy as all he'd ever talk about was how great Roddick was. Fast forward 2 years when it was clear Federer had emerged and all he did was hype of Federer. Not good analysis/announcing.

Djokovic just better

He never got over his PTSD from 2011 US Open match vs. Novak (same 40-15 with double match point). Djoko partially wrecked his psyche.

@Robert Le less slams than Novak Less masters than Novak Less weeks at no.1 than Novak Losing h2h Yeah Federer is GOAT now u r going to say stats don't matter right 🤡

@@mambi74 Sadly true

The Big three each have their own area of greatness: - Roger is the most dominant. He has bageled the other two more (he has more bagels in general) and his wins are usually more comfortable with less games lost. -Rafa is the King of comebacks. He usually plays even better after losing and being cornered, fights after every point and has turned as round a match from being match point and set down and also a set from being 5-1 40-0 down. -Nole is the most clutch. He's overall a robot i.e having the most flat, baseline-grinding playstyle, mostly forcing opponents to mistakes or mishits but he plays consistently and he wins the important points. He can be worse than his opponent during an entire match, then win one crucial break point and a tie break and steal the win. His mental toughness is also unparalleled.

u hit the nail on the head . the shots the opponents make are good enough to win points but out of nowhere RF produces a shot that defies all logic

I'm so happy I had the privilege of meeting Roger Federer in person, his such a gentle and lovely man😊 is my role model. After a little conversation, he gave me his private Gmail so I could contact him directly that was so sweet of him.

Esattamente! Lui tirava un colpo inimagginabile e imprendibile dopo che il suo avversario aveva solo un attimo prima tirato un colpo pazzesco senza scampo per chiunque altro. Ma non per Feder!

🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Poor man ……………

Also the racket was very different back before Rodger. He was beyond entertaining to watch and surely a massive headache to his opponents.

Don't forget about Sampras.

don't cry his 38 ATP250 records remained unbroken

​@@rafaundisputedgoat4291Ich hörte, er habe Hämorrhoiden so groß wie Tennisbälle. Haben Sie vielleicht Insider-Wissen?

it was a product of both. Once Nadal and djokovic hit the scene, his success dwindled tremendously. He won only 5 grand slams after 2009

@@Mark-ut5oq But he also started losing to other guys he'd never lost to before in 2010. He kept having early Slam exits, having previously made 18 out of 19 straight(!) finals and 23 straight semis. It's very clear to me that something other than Djokovic and Nadal had an impact on his dwindling results. Either a lot of players got better or Federer after 2009 was less good at winning than before.

Is it true that Federer had glandular fever in 2008?

👏👏👍