A serious legend. Inspired teenage me, as well as millions of others. RIP

Ken block 43ver

Fuck! I didn't hear ab this! Damn. I loved his work

Duh

didnt know he died. rip ken you will be missed. hope you are doing skyhakanas up there!

What happened to him

Just read it. RIP

@@Very_Grumpy_Cat Snow is not road ... at least they lived like few people have guts to live ...

I just figured out...😥😥 Drift high on the Skies broh 🙏 We will miss your Skills and Power 💔 But thank you for living at 100%, you are the inspiration for many.

LOL, most badass driver ever

Do you use predictive analytics?

@@DanClark_ddc no, just predictive text allow me to demonstrate my nuts are not going to work today but I think it's not a big deal

@@caixiuying8901 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@caixiuying8901 xD

Are you allowed to say which team you work for?

@@theterriblepuddle1830 i would call it more like a safety factor then a tolerance

@@theterriblepuddle1830 - Yeha it does cos failure is 0 so 0.00001% above failure is the tiny tolerance they are looking for. BUt its an unusual way of looking at tolerance I would say.

@@theterriblepuddle1830 He used the word 'tolerance' incorrectly, as Rolf exaplained.

There are calculations for strength and other calculations for fatigue. One can calculate the minimum dimension under static load. If overloaded beyond its stress limits a part will first yield ( and deform) then break and result in a stress crack. One can calculate the failure rate for dynamic load for example the minimal dimensions needed before failure of repetitive loads, this is called fatigue. Like a railway cart axle wont fail immediately, but will fail after a certain amount of rotations because of repetitive load cycles. A fatigue crack is fundamentally different from a stress crack. The standard safety factor for both stress (yield) and fatigue is about 1.5, so a part would be guaranteed to not fail by a 100% to a defined maximum of load cycles or rotations at maximum load with a safety margin of 50% extra rotations. By reducing the safety factor from 1.5 to for example 1.05 a part would be designed a bit lighter and still not break by dynamic loads. It is however a risky play, because you are operating a machine so much closer to the edge of failure.

@@AlfaRomeo156SWGTA please explain how you would calculate the fatigue failure cycles on the rotating cart axle. Thanks

@melo Arvidsson The crypto market is highly profitable with an expert broker just like Bernard Wong . I got recommended to him and since then my financial life has been a success.

@bernardwongcrypto That's the username...

yo what

@@HAZSAM fucking bots talking to each other bro.

*sniff sniff these bots have the stench of SCAM*

Believe in JESUS today, confess and repent of your sins. No one goes to heaven for doing good but by believing in JESUS who died for our sins. “That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. ”(Romans 10:9-10)❤️🙏

​@@alunesh12345 - Yawn.

He was for sure to people who don't race or drive competitively. The man was a beast. To others who rally, he was just another driver, nothing really special about him. I mean no disrespect. RIP Ken. You will be missed by many.

@@Sean-pm2vd who cares really, dude was a badass

@@shrimp3487 like I said. He was to you and me but he wasn't much of a badass to others who could drive competitively. I don't think he even won one rally in the WDC. He was average at best compared to other rally drivers. I'm not taking anything away from him. He inspired loads of people and will definitely be sadly missed. I was just disagreeing with you about being one of the sickest dudes to live, like you said.

@seab he didn't achieve anything in wrc, just stuntman

Believe in JESUS today, confess and repent of your sins. No one goes to heaven for doing good but by believing in JESUS who died for our sins. “That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. ”(Romans 10:9-10)❤️🙏

Believe in JESUS today, confess and repent of your sins. No one goes to heaven for doing good but by believing in JESUS who died for our sins. “That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. ”(Romans 10:9-10)❤️🙏

@@alunesh12345 11th commandment: Thou Shalt not SPAM

@@alunesh12345 Who knew Jesus wanted you to exploit someones death to use cult-spam tactics to try and manipulate people into the 'right' religion?

Sorry but, completely disagree about refuelling. Turned every pitstop into a 15 - 20 second snooze. The current tire only stops add more jeopardy..

@@W3ndal it doesn't. What it does is make every strategy predictable because the majority of the time in the pits is going slowly. It's the pit delta. So it ends up creating extra boring scenarios for 99% of the tracks where the strategies are entirely predictable. It's why we love rain so much. But further to why refuelling helps create more strategy, now you can choose to do full fuel, half fuel or splash of fuel. Where a pit delta with full fuel may take 60sec, a half load may be a delta of 40. It adds an extra layer of strategy. But you say, they'll still find the optimal strategy. Yea, they will. But more options means more possible paths to the outcome. Furthermore, Pirellis has made shit tires for a long time. Making them fall off so far and go from great to shit means 90% of strategies use the tire that degrades the slowest. Rare cases where the hard tire is worse do exist but the tires are so bad that without refuelling, the strategies (and best strategy) are _boringly_ predictable. Lastly, you may say "yea but with no fuel, if you mess up a pit stop it hurts". Which is your jeopardy comment. Sure. But define mess up? Over the past 5 years I can't remember when someone had a pit stop that was slower by less than a second to their rival where it actually mattered. The only times where a slower pit stop hurts is when it's really slow - like a 3sec turning into 6sec. And that's rare. So in reality, the pit stops aren't doing anything for the racing. The jeopardy just doesn't exist unless there's a huge screw up. They're only cool to watch from the choreography viewpoint. -F1 and motorsport fan for 35 years and counting.

I'm more into the engineering side but even I would be more than happy to have those V10s back. I love the current V6 but it would be nice to see even more complex engineering with the good old V10 and I know it will not rev as high as it was back then (because 3 engines per season limit). If there's anything I would disagree would be bringing refueling back. I thought it would be cool to see a V10 not having to refuel and last all 50+ laps. But of course it's the engineering part, you can disagree if you want.

@@Real28 yeah but I would feel bad for ferrari strategist. They can't make good decisions even without refueling and stuff.

Yeah, I want write this too yet 👍🏼 Because in the animation was a 4 cylinder to see 😅

Just to add. The 1litre ecoboost i had as hire car back in 2015 was banging. My buddy swapped me his jag xkR for it for a week no joke.

@@CaymanIslandsCatWalks the 140bhp 1l fiesta is surprisingly fun car!! Just a shame Ford fitted with eco ditch finders. I found it understeered too much if pushed.

@@rupertm2542 legit was great fun

The 1.6 was 182hp and on overboost (during 15/20 secs would make 197hp on European version. On the US version there was no overboost and they always make 197hp.

what is a p.u. ?

Power. Unit. As in the system that provides power for the application

Around 750HP I believe. Plus 250HP when the electric battery dumps its load, every lap or so.

@@shelterstation more like 850 w/o the mgu-k

@@exiles299 ERS is 160BHP and allowed 33 seconds per lap, Engine on its own is 700 BHP, not sure where the extra 140BHP comes from?

I wonder what they would sound like now. With direct injection and no fuel cooling probably no rasp.

That would be interesting. I bet the power and dyno curves would be basically a secret though. Indy would likely not mind, Formula 1 teams though.... Aint no way theyd all agree to have their skunkworks numbers just publicly known.

Then Look at the archaeic pushrod V8 engines in drag racing that produce insane amounts of power for far cheaper. Making about 11,000 HP for an 8.3 liter engine. That's like 1,400 hp per liter lol. Also the sound of a top fuel is something that can't be explained. It's the one motorsport where you have to be there to experience it. 0 to 330 mph in under four seconds.

@@4touchdowns1game29 I'm talking about racing engines that last for whole races, as amazing as drag engines are they literally last 400 meters

@@ale_s45 yea I feel you about that. They don't last for shit lol. I'm all about modern engines although I did use to drive a c6 corvette with a pushrod v8 and that thing was amazing. Low weight and made power super easy..

@@ale_s45 one of the most amazing modern engines you should check out is the one in the kawasaki zx 25r. its 250cc revs to 16,000 rpm and tuned people are getting them to make 52 hp na and with a turbo they are getting over 100 hp. That's 400 hp per liter on something that can be driven regularly.

Totally agree!

True, hence why there have been a clampdown, and more coming in the next few years, on engine development and rules. No one wants another decade of a single bottomless-pocket manufacturer winning everything backed by their ridiculously overpowered engine.

MK7 is 1.6L Ecoboost engine. I think they round it up the new 1.5L to 1.6L to make it at same capacity of the F1 for a better comparative

Yeah I think he looked up the cost to purchase a new engine. That isn't the cost to manufacture.

I don't think they can be seized because it would make them really hard to assemble. I think the need warm them before starting is to get components to the right size before starting to minimise wear.

This video was mostly fluff except for the outro KEN BLOCK.

Specifically, 1.5 liter iron block 4 cylinder tipped on its side with just one big turbo.

@@ATEC101I heard that was basically a production line engine.