And damn it worked. I am convinced not to wait for Nvidia availability and go with AMD card instead. If this tech works as advertised.

@@bronzehd6212 I think AMD said that FSR is open source, but it’ll be up to NVIDIA to implement it on their own cards. So in a way, you’re kinda right

Hearts and minds.

@@IntoTheAbyss98 so you would want the company that wants to give everyone an uplift or a company that wants you to upgrade your decent card to get the uplift just because they don’t want to implement the amd software?

Indeed it’s great marketing. Not only are you getting brownie points by making older hardware relevant for longer, the chance that a nvidia customer would switch to AMD can be low because of cuda/tenser core dependencies. So this way they will take longer to switch to a new card as long as their old one keeps running

I bought AMD when I built my new system early 2020, 5950x for the cpu. Been happy, I'll likely be buying AMD GPU for the next gen, tired of Nvidia's shit.

@@kyesniper same Been an nvidia fanboy for awhile until I've learned what amd has been doing lately and I'm feeling quite incentivized to leaned over towards amd. Looking into the Ryzen 9 now which is looking amazingly affordable oddly. Why is that actually?

@@jayr5mitty351 DEFINITELY go with Ryzen, even if you still go with a Nvidia card. You won't regret it. That's been my biggest AMD complaint though is Nvidia just had them by the balls when it came to GPUs, even if AMDs newest cards are more powerful. Hopefully this will be a game changer and won't take forever to get to the same level as DLSS. And I COMPLETELY agree with the OP. I love to see this. AMD gets it. Sell a top quality product and support them for longer, and you'll have loyal customers forever. Not to mention going as far as supporting competitors hardware? They're truly doing it for the gamers and not just to line their pockets by creating more and more e-waste, unlike some (i.e. ALL lol) other companies trying to phase out anything thats older than last gen.

@@corey640 100%

AMD's FSR uses Lanczos tech, just like nVIDIA's years-old sharpening filter. It's been an option in nVIDIA's Control Panel for years.

This was the exact thinking that made me choose a Nitro+ 6800 XT over a 3080 when I had both in my basket back in January.

This was my thought too when i bought my 6700xt. If this is also implemented into the series x and the ps5 i could see it getting very popular

@@somedudenamedryan hey im currently looking into the 6700xt. How good is it?

@@MindAndMyth its great for 1440p. Im running it on an ultrawide monitor and i have no issues getting 140+fps on 3440x1440p on forza horizon 4 and motorsport 7. I havent had a chance to push it on a more graphically demanding game like rdr2 or cyberpunk yet though

if that software is only needed an update for xbox and ps5, that would make their games have higher peformance on a high resolution 60+ fps on console would be standardized by then

Care to explain about PhysX?

@@tudy000 Physx was created by Ageia, and designed to run on a separate add-on card (Physx PPU). nVidia acquired Ageia, then put Physx support into their GPUs and discontinued the PPU card. The Physx SDK also removed support for the PPU card, completing the lock-in.

Ok, let's get some facts straight, because there's just too much false expectation around...and it's not how things work with Nvidia... Ageia's tech was ALSO proprietary...duuh! You would have needed to buy a separate card that does a lot of parallel processing, you would have needed separate drivers and you would have needed to have games supporting this standalone add-in card. What Nvidia have done is they looked ta the tech, noticed that it can be done effectively using parallel processors on their GPUs (CUDA) and they bought them out. What this did was enable a huge chunk of the market take advantage of the tech, where previously it would have been forgotten (how many games supported the PPU, can you tell me? How many did you play? Did you even know the PPU existed back then? I did.). The unfortunate truth is that as tech gets faster - a lot of what could previously not be done on the CPU - could now be done, at least in part, on it + there's just not that much demand for insane particle physics in games (which sucks... I loved making a mess in Mafia II, Alice: Madness Returns and Borderlands 2). Now let's take a look at some other "proprietary tech": Nvidia's G-Sync was a technological push during the time when the VESA variable refresh rate standard was not a thing. They had to rely on making their own chips for screens that can talk to the GPUs and the scaler boards to time and adjust the refresh rate correctly on-the-fly. This was HUGE at the time and was a move endorsed by the tech legends like Tim Sweeney and John Carmack. Fast forward some years - VESA comes out with a new DisplayPort spec, includes Adaptive Sync in it, AMD jumps on branding it because they now support it and everyone who didn't know what the hell is going on (including you, dear commenters) hails AMD as some hero... Nvidia is not responsible for monitor standardization - that's VESA's job. Because VESA integrated variable refresh rates into the new specs - Nvidia's proprietary chips were (almost) no longer needed. It's not a "haha Nvidia lost" kind of a thing - Nvidia pushed for the change by coming out with their own solution FIRST - at the time when no alternative existed! The same goes with FSR, but *not quite*... DLSS is a MACHINE LEARNING route, where an AI model can infer high-res images from low-res images using training data and a few supporting buffers that it gets from the game (such as the motion vector pass, which defines where and how fast the pixels/models are moving in space). FSR, on the other hand, uses spatial upscaling from a low res image, resulting in "crap in - crap out", if you will. If you took a low-res image into Photoshop and upscaled it and sharpened it - you'd get basically the same result - there cannot be extra detail where none was there to begin with. This is also clearly visible from their provided samples, as well as the video they had showcasing FSR. There's no machine learning that can synthesize (the same way as you can "imagine" a high-res image from a thumbnail) the frames. I am saying this because I see soo much hype, fanboyism and denial about what FSR is and what it will remain to be, I see people dumping on Nvidia - but...you'll just be disappointed. People expect it to get better over time - and I'm sure it will...slightly - but it will NEVER match DLSS, simply because it's not doing the heavy lifting. Please understand this and have realistic expectations. This is not a "G-Sync vs Free-Sync" and not a "PhysX" again - this is a completely different situation. What you should, as fans, be doing is you should be pushing for AMD to integrate fast AI processing into their GPUs so you can also take advantage of the technology. Until that happens - FSR will keep lacking detail, even if you get a performance boost, same way as you do when simply lowering the resolution. I am also disappointed that Jay is spreading misinformation on this topic. As a 3D artist I use AI upscaling technologies all the time, pretty much on a daily basis... When the method became widely available and we started using it - holy crap did the quality go up! Suddenly we went from telling clients "if we upscale your low res image it'll look crap" to "yeah, we can make it look much better". I've processed a LOT of images using both methods and there's just no competition to AI image inference. The same applies to DLSS vs FSR.

@pookey Are you honestly arguing that they aren't trying to create monopolies, proprietary and otherwise? Look at the ARM deal and tell me Nvidia isn't trying head off future competition from the mooted integrated processing approach. They're a multinational corporation - they're not anyone's friend.

@@quirinaled2752 True Nvidia isn't your friend but neither is AMD. I don't get the fanboyism they are all big companies simply after your money. Once one company has the upperhand they usually become complacent and become the big bad. "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain"

Yes 470/480 for RX 400 series

Yep, they're going back to Polaris for their stuff (and Pascal for Nvidia), so it's the 470/480/570/580/590 but not the lower tier SKUs.

you look like a skinny videogamedunkey

great cause both my gaming pcs have rx 480's

Yay happy RX480 noises, I love this card

Or she knows that capitalism is about making better and better products?

Capitalism is about profit not good products. Capitalism is a shitty system but the best we have for now.

@@JonDoe123456 for now???

@@JonDoe123456 capitalism is not the best we have

@@That.guy0 what ever geniuses can come up with, maybe in the future. Capitalism is an invention just like most other things , it's good but not perfect. Also an AI optimized system would be way more efficient and productive even if implemented today. Most large governments and large corporations are extremely inefficient and anyone that worked in either knows exactly what I'm taking about with both wasting money on bs in small enough amounts that no one bat's an eye but totaled together, a quarter or more of their total spending is just flushing money down the toilet. Only recently formed large Corp have less inefficiencies and even they increase with time

Nvidia has to one up themselves or AMD is gonna walk up behind them quietly and shove a knife in their back. And right now, with the 4070 doing horribly, that knife is really close.

@@Not_interestEd-Looks like the Rx7600 was the knife, cause it’s absolutely destroying the 4060ti in sales. Where I am you can’t even find them in stores because they’re selling so fast. To add salt to the wound they also slashed prices on 6950XT’s. Nvidia doesnt really care that much though because the money they’re making is coming from AI now. The RTX 50 series may be the last series we see from Nvidia.

@@82_930 last consumer grade cards* Yeah, wouldn't surprise me.

Assuming it’ll be over in a few years 😆. Na it will be once Eth 2.0 hits and all the mining farms will liquidate their 3060 Ti and 3070 stock.

Getting a 3070 for 500$ does feel great I have to admit...

With the way rdna3 is looking that's good

The worlds gonna end soon, just buy what you want and enjoy the time you have left

@@ASTRALEGION Not soon enough it seems.

"What if we used 100% of the brain"

@@danielpham8627 yo. I tried using 100 percent of my brain n all. But to no avail nothing special happened. I don’t have a brain. Tips?

Oh you have to sit back huh, just glasses off & I'm 360p all the way

You know it really does depend on the developer. Like I've actually seen Total Warhammer 2 and 40k Inquisitor Martyr and each has these horrible jagged edges at even 1440p. Meanwhile at a lower resolution it basically doesn't look that much different and I think that's the developer's fault but dunno why. The amount of jaggies was so awful. You can get pretty used to a lower resolution but yeah, basically if you're actually building a new system and got a good card somehow I think you should at least get a 1440p monitor, and if not, you may as well use a lower end OEM office machine tier upgraded with cheaper Maxwell or GCN or whatever cards to power a sub-1080p display like I do. It's mostly fine.

🤭🤣

I had so many people bring me grainy video from a crappy security camera...."Can you enhance this?" They'd be trying to get a license number or something. ( I worked at a video production place). We could convert old 8mm, photos, do SOME restoration, all kinds of stuff. Sometimes you can get some detail out of a DARK photo or video...but if it's white, overexposed...there's nothing there. And no...when you cheaped out on the 240p camera...I can't do ANYTHING with it.

DLSS is not only magic, it's voodoo. Predicting 5 pixels from a single pixel. That is some CSI enhanced shit. Of course DLSS uses frames over motion(60 to 150 fps) video whereas topaz gigapixel AI, Sharpen AI & Denoise AI. Affinity Photo Pro and PhotoZoom Pro. Enhancing one frame leads to bunch of tools that have enhancer range limits. Single frame has 200% to 500% enhancement or resolution requirement. Suites limitations on camera lense depth and Artificial zoom.

photoshop added sharpen in 1990

@@yourhandlehere1 I could do "some" with it, but it wouldn't be quick, and the result would just be a still image. 240p is pretty miserable to work with though. At best though, I'd just be making a nearly-legible license into a legible one. I remember CSI once 'enhanced' the reflection of evidence on the pupil of an eyeball which was in frame... people have some pretty unrealistic expectations.

@@kathrynck cough _movies_ cough

Huawei needs to be kicked to the curb.

The beauty of unscripted content!

It makes sense, Rx400 and Rx500 are both Polaris.

400 and 500 series are the same cards

It should all the 500 series is a refresh of the 400 series.

Yes, but only to 470 and 480.

Yep they did - I posted a linky to that post (well, the linky might get stripped off, but anyhow).

only reason they included that was because 1060 is still a large user base on steam.

sad 960 owner*

@@tanmaypanadi1414 and to dissuade those users from buying a 20xx/30xx, witholding Nvidia from more funds

It should work practically on any modern card produced in the last decade or so. They just used GTX 1060 as an example because it was the most popular GPU on Steam. The only thing you should be sad about is whether Nvidia would want to optimize the FSR tech for their cards. AMD said that they have _enabled_ this tech on any hardware but have _optimized_ the quality only on their Radeon GPUs which is understandable. It's a bit naive to expect that AMD will do the whole work for Nvidia, especially with AMD's limited resources which are much smaller than Nvidia's. Nvidia has to do some tweaking to FSR on their side and on their GPUs in order to bring it to the level of quality we saw in the Godfall demo ran on Radeon. So don't expect the FSR quality on GeForce to look the same as FSR on Radeon on release.

960 owner over here😂

I walked in my local microcenter yesterday and picked up a 6900 xt off the shelf.. they had prob a dozen or so across brands... got some sideways looks from the guys camping outside for the nvidia cards as I left

@@jhartsock79 Nearest Microcenter is like 50 miles away from me

@@K_I_L_R_O_Y nearest one is like 500 miles for me

@@jhartsock79 and the etailer I regularly buy tech at has 4 different types of 3090s and 3080s with each having a stock of 10-15. When limiting the n to 1 it's easy to make it look like one manufacturer has no problems. The realiy is that both are more likely out of stock than in stock across the board.

@@BUDDAz1g Feelsbadman

Cant wait

@@NotaRealScientist same here

finally it came true

@@NotaRealScientist Same

xD

Steve lives in the iCloud.

@Andrew go on kid

Hey Jesus loves you. Acts 2:38. Upci church locator for a church.

@Andrew hey Jesus loves you. Acts 2:38. Upci church locator for a church.

Actually, I'm expecting Digital Foundry to have this video rather than Gamers Nexus.

If you mean the AMD RX 6800 then you should be able to get decent frames at 4k

rx6800 indeed. I have seen some stuff showing the card is capable, I just know the rx6800xt would have been the one to own. Not complaining though, I am happy as is given the current GPU climate!

Love my rx 470 oc 4gb XD

@@aoiyuki9040 you should. Can't get one now. Nothing at low price is available.

All I know is RX580 is a beast, I am sure they will support 480

@@tensevo RX 480, 580, 590 are basically the same card.

@@esbenm6544 Like the i7-6700, i7-7700, i7-8700, i7-9700, i7-10700...

Agreed.

I was just about to ask that. That would honestly make APUs like the 2400G or the 3200/3400G worth buying (as long as you OC the vega iGPU. On my 2200G I OCed the Vega 8 from 1100 to 1600mhz and got a 10-15fps bump in most games.) In fact if you OC the Vega 11 in the 2400G it is just as fast as a GDDR5 GT 1030. Hows about them apples?

Does it support laptop APU's as well? This would be great for handheld game consoles like the aya neo.

@@Samisipi highly likely. Everything Vega is supported.

FSR won't look as good as native resolution. Not even close. Just wait and see by yourself

Really can I get a source

@@fakedungeonmaster5740 www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/joao-silva/amd-updates-list-of-fsr-compatible-gpus-to-include-the-rx-480-and-rx-470/

Agreed, I love all the knowledge i'm gaining in this video!

My favorite videos by far

well soon youll have an AMD 1060 ,its gonna revive your card :D

@@robb5828 true. I'm kinda hoping I get a little more out of until the market stabilizes if ever. Told some friends about this as well since they all have 1060s too

Ha! That's silly, he only has twenty-some minute videos on such. Multiple of them...

@@moldyshishkabob and they'll add up to 65 mins. Lol

He is... verbose.

LoL Shots fired.

To be fair, Steve's review of the 3080 ti is short if you end it when he says we don't need to watch the rest of the video. The majority of the vid is optional.

That worked out well for Sega.

AMDoes what Nivdon't

@@qwkimball At the time, for sure. Sega got pretty splintered towards the end of the Genesis era and the 32x, SegaCD, then Saturn, and finally the greatest console ever in the Dreamcast, were never able to bring Sega back to their Genesis (and Master System) heyday :(

​@@qwkimball Sega didn't lose out to Nintendo, it lost to Sony and Microsoft.

@@RandomPlaceHolderName I mean, Microsoft kind of failed too, because they lost money off of the Original Xbox.

Lmfao

He did though, David was never going to lose that fight, he brought a gun to a knife fight. Goliath could never close the distance against a dude unencumbered by armor

Yeah it was a stone in a slingshot then using Goliath's sword against him.

@@NorHeadHunter see my statement above

Yeah, that giant megacorporation AMD is a true underdog. XD

And we absolutely guarantee to have no stock of GPUs ever!

Haha I got a 3080 from them today. Feeling good.

My MC has 50+ cards every day lol.

Bruh there is not even good pc components shop in my country

I live on an island...

Honestly, they need to dump a shit ton of money for opencl to catch up to cuda

@@raawesome3851 that's my biggest concern. I do game on my editing PC so I'm kinda stuck with Nvidia for now in that regard.

@@CHEFPKR I literally just said all this in a separate comment too haha. Nvidia is getting complacent just like Intel was pre-Ryzen with CPUs. Evidence? 3080ti ... oof.

@CHEFPK yo you into hardware too? Big fan!

@@IamNinetyFour Nvidia is not getting complacent they are leading in software features, raytracing and DLSS and the fastest card is the RTX 3090. For the past generations they have been the GPU market leader even know. Intel kept us on the same 14nm and architecture for many, many generations. However RNDA2 rasterization performance was better than Nvidia expected. So much that the RTX 3080 was suppose to be the 3080ti. This is why the top end Nvidia cards are in a weird space.

One of the reasons I left Nvidia long ago is they don't care about older generations like AMD

Don't buy this pos just download it

download cracked bro, cyberpunk is not worth the moeny so if u really wanna play it ( i did the same) i downloaded crcked and i finished it and will say a 5.5/10 or 6.

@@gitapatel9842 it's DRM free, so it doesn't need to be "cracked" I guess you mean just pirate it.

If you got good hardware, cyberpunk is a beautiful story experience. The game is not bad nor is it ambitious. If you liked any of the FarCry games, you'd like Cyberpunk.

@@cybershellrev7083 one of these games has working a.i. comparing it to farcry is an insult. Also you're just wrong, I like far cry I thought cp2077 is a joke. decent story, every other part of the game is broken and a complete mess at every single corner. Edit- oh, and it looks nice on high-end hardware.

that is a critical punch to nvidia..... if they can get the big developers in this too, it will be insane

@@ArielGonzalez1 it's more than that. All the power Nvidia can wield is about AiB laptops and preassembled desktops manufacturers clients, A.K.A. GPP (GeForce Partner Program), and providing them with discrete graphic cards. If AMD and Intel can pack enough punch with their integrated GPUs (iGPU), thus making "gaming" laptops and preassembled desktops viable and cheap, Nvidia in a TREMENDOUS trouble. Remember how AMD kicked Nvidia out of the gaming consoles market thanks to their custom APUs. The story may repeat itself.

@@ArielGonzalez1 a little addenda: if you carefully look at the wildly popular Steam stats, and correctly interpret them, you can see that almost the totality of GPUs listed there are from laptops and preassembled desktops. Truth is, notebooks sell IMMENSELY more than DIY desktops, and age faster.

@@_A.d.G_ that's kind of the direction coreteks predicted things would be moving in... Here we are. Honestly it makes sense and also makes sense that Nvidia wants to do stuff with arm asap.

Microsoft makes sense cause the Xbox uses amd graphics. Not sure about the cpy though

Toooo be faaaaaiirrrrrrr

@@bleughost toooooooo be faaaaaaaaaiiirrrrrrrrrrrrr

Tooo be FAAAAAIIIIRRRR

@@gwynbleidd7177 Tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo be Faaaaaaaaaaaaaair

TOOOO BEEEEE FAAAAAAIIIIIRRRR -fist wrap up pump to completion

Still searching for tech jesus' video about this 😂

It apparently hasn't come yet.

I bloody hope so!

I lol'd

Mumbling .... Steve mumbles his way through videos. This is why I very rarely watch/listen to Steve. And that sucks, because I would love to get his perspective on things.

I don't know how far it is to my nearest store but it's definitely on the wrong side of the Atlantic. 😂

same here, nearest is 3900 miles away. Kinda difficult for a weekend trip but maybe tramping helps a bit

I live in Manitoba, Canada so I know I do not qualify...

I'll get my dinghy and cross the Atlantic in a moment, I mean, it's free, I don't wanna lose on this one.

2hr drive for me.

The cards aren't thick but their coolers are due to GPU's getting hotter over the years

What good is this tech when miners are taking all the availability off-the-shelf 😬

@@spasiklakigaming5075 "Card" means the whole unit/product, including the cooler. The PCB and silicon have gotten more dense and the TDPs have been getting bigger. It's just not a sustainable path at this rate.

I mean, in the grand scheme of things, why not? I wouldn't mind my desktop PC being twice the size. I have a large case as is and there's plenty of space in it. Why not have larger components if it helps with thermals? I really don't understand the draw for these tiny components and ultra thin laptops. Just makes them more fragile and more expensive. I want something bulky that works.

@@DefianceOrDishonor In the grand scheme of things, bigger components mean more e-waste, what's already a huge problem, as well as energy consumption (Carbon footprint).

100% this, i even requested the game on their website. I have 5700xt and playing on 2k (everything maxed out) > getting 90/100fps. Imagine getting 150+, oufft that would be the dream!

Yeah I get 90-120 fps at 900p high settings but its both bc the gpu and a cpu bottleneck. I get my 10600k in a few days and FSR would be the perfect pairing to play in warzone at high fps on my 5500xt 8 GB

I'm curious too, but I'm not expecting too much from the first generation. I think it'll fall somewhere between DLSS 1.0 and 2.0. Their second generation FSR should be on par with whatever DLSS version is out at that time. I'm glad AMD's in the game now.

Dlss in warzone make the game too blurry.

@@Firefly_Nino I get that same framerate but at 1080p on my 980 Ti on warzone. To be fair the 980Ti is about the same perf as a 1070/1660 Ti and the 5700xt is ~ equivalent to the 2070 super. I have a buddy who built a sleeper with a 5700xt (the THICC 3 ver.... commence eyeroll....) and a 3900x. I have a 3900xt with my 980 Ti and it suits my needs for esports 1080p high detail @ 165fps for the games I play and AAA games high detail @90-120fps @ 1080p

I already lost it.

I don´t have patience with either. But i have limited options in my region.

"the reason people go with Nvidia is dlss" Uh, no. it's because their only information is what's trendy, you give the average consumer too much credit

@@tnix80 I will give no shit to anyone for wanting to run AMD cards over Nvidia but for chrissake, don't pretend like there isn't legitimate reasons not to take a 6800xt over a 3080

@@Dozeball Totally fair, that's an opportunity I wouldn't let slip if I were in that spot. We're long past the point of just taking whatever upgrade we can get our g a m e r claws on...

So the dl algorithm does the job?

Then why does Nvidia participate in development so much? What's the point of it if its generated on the fly?

@@chacharealsmooth941 because noone really knows besides nvidia how dlss works. Personally, it should always have been an algo making the upscale like the image upscalers do on cpu. The algorithm made after training with millions of pictures, and it just runs on the tensor cores of GPU for faster processing and execution.

so why does developers still have to upload these images and wait for confirmation?

@@bhBlacky82 nobody really knows. Like I said

Same here. 3700x and an RX 5700. Bought my RX 5700 for €290 two years ago which was an absolute steal - sold my 1060 for it and took the plunge. To say it had some issues was an understatement... The performance was great, lots of improvements over my 6GB 1060, but the drivers... Oh boy. I was relatively lucky according to what other people were experiencing and I still had at least a few crashes a month, probably 8 or so at most. I've tried so many things - disconnecting my second and third screen, reinstalling the card, reinstalling drivers, etc. Nothing worked. I was at the hands of AMD's software engineers to fix the issues. Luckily, they did. I rarely experience issues now, although I'm still uncertain what caused the earlier issues. Some people say it has to do with the memory timing due to some cards having memory from two different brands on one card, which was fixable with a bios flash - don't feel like doing that in todays GPU market though :P They've convinced me to stay and I'm now trying to upgrade to an RX 6800 for MSRP... Its tough, but I think I might be able to do it.

11th Gen mobile cpus from intel are faster in gaming than mobile ryzen...though not in productivity of course. Ryzen is the defacto productivity choice.

@@johnhenderson7285 time is money. When it comes to productivity XD

@@sgtbuckwheat They sure have!

They always existed

@@chriswright8074 yeah ok but they legit predicted bankruptcy in 2020.

Had me an Athlon XP 1300

Yeah .that was 3 days ago.

Fidelity will most likely not be as good as DLSS from what AMD showed us, it looks really soft (the image)

It still is nice that amd is sharing it don’t get me wrong

@@organicmetal6850 they got it working, so why wouldn't they? they also had nvidia cards listed on the game request site

@@organicmetal6850 other amd technologies work with nvidia cards for example amd's CHS works both on nvidia cards. intel hd, and of course amd

@@droson8712 Someone has to put in the work to get it to work for the different cards. The technology is compatible with Nvidia cards, but it isn't going to be optimized for Nvidia cards unless Nvidia puts in some work as well. (I could still see them putting in some effort for some of the older but popular nvidia cards initially just to get some extra good publicity. But right now it's only optimized for 1060 in that specific title. It won't be the case for the rest of the games that support this technology).

And it sucks, it's a lesser technology and we'll be back to be obliged to what they do to consoles, also ray tracing could be in jeopardy since it would be as mediocre as we've seen so far in ps5 /Xbox

@@davepianist84 meh I have a 20 series card and have never played with rtx on . It’s simply not optimized well enough yet and some games are almost unplayable unless you have a 3080/3090 no I think is safe to say rtx will be more common next gen of consoles . Even if the consoles were running nvidia gpus rtx still wouldn’t be running above 30 fps in 2k or 4k

Save us from what?.

@@dirge7459 save us from good image quality.

@@dirge7459 If this works? Low fps and overpriced gpus

@@bronzehd6212 I know, what I meant was that those who have older/weaker gpus won't necessarily have to buy new ones thanks to this feature (If it works, that is) thanks to the fps improvement

yeah because amd totally doesnt jack up prices when they can stupid fanboys

id be willing to say most Micro Center's have tuns of stuff on the shelves... unfortunately its usually junk.

I noticed that, I live in the UK we don't have micro centre but we have currys/pc World an even there shelves look nothing like that haha

@@Edzewkurai well yeah but in the ad they had a lot of gpus

Or nVidican't? nVidiain't?

@@Windowsfan100 I kept the original idea of Nintendon't but sure, why not!

Right!! I bought my rx570 thinking it was already obsolete!

@@Lucaspc99 oof i am desperately seeking an rx gpu :( trying to build my friend a better pc then what he currently has.

@@johannmaldonado7148 i bought mine from AliExpress, a bit before prices gone crazy, on 2019 Black Friday

Sega does what Nintendon't?

AMDoes what Nvidon't 🎵

AMD is what Nvidiain't

@@cipherwing4211 better ver of what Drug Joza said tbh

Buy it now... (I don't take any responsibility for your loss BTW.)

Buy it now and sell it by the 20th as it’ll fall like a rock once FSR is released.

@@oxfordsparky Do you know something about FSR that we don't?

@@Argoon1981 stock for any company that releases a new product or line of products, will build up in anticipation of launch; then shortly after launch it will start falling again. Just the way that stocks GENERALLY go. Like another said, I don’t take any responsibility for what you do with your investments. I’m sure as shit not a financial advisor lol so take it how you will

@@Argoon1981 it seems to be getting a lot of attention and hype, but it's a first generation tech that took a long time to arrive. My money is on a massive disappointment. I'd love to be wrong though, since I'm sporting a 1080ti and free fps is free fps

Moves like Jagger?

making money moves

I like to move it, move it...

There have been hints among the various channels I watch that making sure consoles were ready to go (at least reasonably) is one of the reasons they've taken so long to release FSR. I may be #pcmr, but I know that everything that benefits consoles trickles down to the PC crowd eventually.

I haven't a gpu yet and I play games like call of duty, halo, ghost recon, sniper elite and it got me thinking because the new halo is going to be coming out I wonder if it will perform better on a amd card with fsr 🤔 I say this because it might help me actually decide which card to go for because I can get a amd card for £250 over the msrp where as the nvidia cards are like £1000 over the msrp

Yeah I see that technology being much much more useful and accessible than dlss. I can’t wait for it and I hope it works. I’m on a gtx 1070.

@@ifstatementifstatement2704 Unfortunately when I bought my gpu (980Ti) for $20 less than a 1070 I didn't take into account that it wouldn't support; 1. Freesync 2. FSR 3. other stuff that I'm not bothered enough to go look up

It's a UKpostsr trait.... :p

Hell Yeah Bro!!!!!

590 here. Can't wait for the improvement

@@Banditt42 same herencia bro, budget gpu power up!!! Boight it in octubre 2020