VOIP ?

@@Kasual7 yes also local enemy voip

@@TheSquidThatCould honestly this isn't a question I should've asked but this is the world we live in now... where one gotta ask if a multi-player fps got voip or a scoreboard lol. Thanks tho!

Just like halo 5, battlefield 2042 should have been under a different name. It could have been a decent game if they sorted the bugs out but it isn't battlefield.

@@bro3217 heros shooters field. With vehicles. The clone wars. 2042. That's what we got.

I'm pretty sure they're high-fiving and doing a round of shots with all this publicity and potential players they're getting from this.

@@Moonhermit- lol this is a pretty well known game before jack, but im sure they are happy to see him play regardless

@@matthewmoser1010 i bet the three of them are pretty damn happy

Like at Battlefield 2042?

Imagine being a battlefield dev seeing your community flock to this😂

Yeah....nowadays almost all big game's first priority is making the game "look" realistic, while gameplay wise, they're decades behind

确实，游戏玩法才是最重要的

@@unicornhuntercg And gameplay wise, you are right. When Dice took 3 years to developp 2042 it was the minimum i expected because they already knew what the player base want, so there was room for innovation, that is crazy to think that 2042 is a battlefield.

No, this is a perfect example of when your game design choices aren't ruled by committee.

I know, if they want to develope a high def version, they just need to make the assets & textures & tweek a few properties

Gives you hope for the gaming industry

No way in hell did Bf 2042 take 2billion to develop? If so, that's absurd.

​@@kylegibson5933 i doubt it was anywhere near 2 billion, that would make it the most expensive videogame ever made and wouldve cost 6x more than the #2 spot at 336 million

@@rango3580 you say this but not the game ……

1.9B went in their pockets.

no lol

I would play this if it was on console

Its mroe fun than 2042

10k players it already has 5x the amount of players

it's already happening 10k players v 2k 1700 in Shitfield 2042

Saddest part is that Battlefront 2 was doing good and receiving regular free content updates until they pulled the dev team to work on BF2042

AM I GOOD AT FPS GAMES? 🥺👀

I feel your pain

The thing I like about battlefront was the chaos the death the war

Imagine the whole Bf franchise dies but this thing get decent models and graphics instead. Instant success.

TLDR is that they've borrowed heavily from Insurgency Sandstorm and Squad/Arma, but applied these mechanics into Battlefield game modes instead of either the very basic game modes of Insurgency or the open ended missions in milsim games.

@@bigangenbygang hardcore, yet casual. This might be huge, if it drops on console too it’s gonna be crazy

they developed the game because they couldnt run squad on their hardware and it blew up suddenly

@@essegotdatheat3310 insurgency is already extremely casual

@@essegotdatheat3310 I agree with this, the game looks great and could be the next big thing

lmao if youre 12

@@petermattison ya because graphics are everything, right? If it is not realistic, its a kids game right?

@@petermattison I'm really glad its going for the low poly aesthetic keeps people like you away from it

@@petermattison sorry but it's you mate

And its 1gb only lol

And he didnt even discover everything This game is insane

A kid in a candy store lol

Developers these years are dodos in gaming. Halo infinite should’ve took notes from Dooms snap. Halo infinite progression system should’ve been near to identical to reaches including the customization and unlocks. Call of duties ghost had the best operator customization out all the CODs 2042 got rid of leaning Plenty of more games where they got rid of features and replaced them with alternative or weak feeble feature no one asked for.

@@incelisshowing3247 No leaning? The fuck, is this BF3 all over again? Forget that, comparing that buggy mess to Battlefield 3 is an insult to the later, which its still very fun.

@@incelisshowing3247 actually AW was better for customization

@@omegapx4495 your right and I apologize on that mistake I made perhaps I was quick to type.

Check out Squad

yeah if youre a baby

@@petermattison Paul, you're either an underdeveloped mid 20's man child or you're literally no older than 15, I think you should go to bed either way, you need all the sleep you can get, hopefully a few more brain cells will grow to help you in life.

@@petermattison youre the baby here

I mean I don't mind both. The cool thing is that this probably runs on my laptop great and battlefield can garentee you does not 😂 but man battlefield 4 still looks sick compared to this but this does good for the style tbh

it hasent even launched yet...

Depends how you look at it. If the people working on it say they're done then it's over. If they say they're in development that tells you how they feel compared to where they are and functionality wise this outcompetes basically everything I've seen on the market. Imagine different game modes.

They're listening to their community, and taking suggestions & criticism on their discord. They're also transparent with us, like when they brought down the playtest because of an anticheat issue. The discord went nuts cause they all wanted to play, and instead of keeping the servers down, they published a fix and booted the servers back up again. All this in like 2 hours. These guys are dedicated to their game, their community, and they know what they are doing.

Truth. What an amazing display of Three guys vs Five Studios worth of people.

Seriously? That's pretty impressive, it looks amazing!

and people will still defend bf2042 even tho it was worked on by hundreds of people across multiple AAA game studios

@@Pobsworth yeah because graphics.... but tbh like I just want the game to be fun.

@@tuelzalt its mad because the graphics in 2042 are arguably worse than the game before it

Exactly, people are always so worried about "graphics" but in reality the are talking about how real it looks. Sea of Thieves has amazing graphics but is not realistic, and battlefield doesn't need to be ultra real, it needs to look realistic but it doesn't need to be insane. Gameplay over everything else.

Hear me out... I do love me some immersion though. These graphics kick me out of it. Still fun though.

It's like back to the BF2 days. I really miss that game.

Yeah I don't care how pretty something looks if it isn't any fun to play. I've never understood people who prioritize graphics (at least for games like Battlefield).

@@sam8404 I get what you mean. The graphics just help with my escapism more.

@@Illfury it’s not realistic, but I actually really like the graphics and art style. Players are distinct, identifiable by team, and lots of visual cues to direct gameplay like what materials can be destroyed.

I want to bash Battlefield too, but let's not get carried away.

I think it caters to low end players, I personally like that factor, allows for anyone who can, play

@@ryleyw3684 it caters to ppl who actually like good gun mechanics and gameplay. the graphics play no role in who the game caters too at all. this is battlefield with better overall mechanics, systems, maps, customization.. you name it

@@FerbyCW that and its literally made by three people.

@@FerbyCW I don't think you understand what I mean... it's made so people with low end hardware can play it reasonably ok. Because of its low poly design, which typically is the best design choice when you take low end systems into consideration.

I hope engineers can resupply them too!

Ik it stops fuckers from camping in a tank like in battlefield

Battlefield 2042* only

i love the fact that Battle Bit as more content than BF2042

It’s not about the graphics, it’s about the actual gameplay. Core design. This is so much better in that retrospect than CoD 2077.

AM I GOOD AT FPS GAMES? 🥺👀

@@deltaDXsoulja21 Your comment doesn’t make sense. “Cod 2077” what? You mean cod vangturd, and sh@tField 2042

Yup. 😀

This game looks awesome!

He definitely can I dont see why not

*looks at past battlefield games

Remember when Dice said that was too complicated for them to do

@@kevinduffy09 more like they’re too lazy it sounds like

@@TOUD_ agreed

@@TOUD_ yes

has squad mechanics too so cool

It’s not, it’s like a roblox squad ripoff. And it feels like a roblox game

@@xhg7a And it’s somehow more enjoyable than the newest BF release. Why are you whining? Lmfao.

Honestly I don't care for these people's opinions, I'm just happy that there's an easy access, casual, solid, and clean game that takes what we have always wanted. Enjoy it or not, your life.

@@xhg7a Looks like or feels like? Two completely different things. It definitely doesn't feel "like a roblox game", whatever that's supposed to mean. The gunplay is solid!

This looks more fun tbh

theres a Hardcore gamemode actually. though atm its being balanced for the main release

Right? The AK74 foesnt have much recoil and kills fast! IRL its one of the easier platforms to shoot fully auto from. Definetly playing this tomorrow.

@@BasedMan Sorry to tell u this, but the playtest just ended this morning. The next playtest is on April 8th.

@@Chewietron3000 shieee. Thanks for the tip.

@@Chewietron3000 wha-NOOOOOO~!

@@shelladdition more devs should take this approach. Hell, BeamNG still is unreleased, and it has IMPROVED a lot in just a couple years of player feedback.

He should play ravenfield too

Me too man, idk how mfs play these newer battlefields when BF4 was the last good one :(

@@GHOST5800000 Come and play BF4 then, there is still populated servers on PC at least

@@GHOST5800000 Take a look at world war 3. I'm enjoying that one alot over 2042.

Bf1 is my favourite battlefield and im not afraid to say it

Bf1 was my first multiplayer battlefield game and I thoroughly enjoyed it, especially because of the atmosphere. As for the newer ones though, they seem horrendous.

It actually blew my mind. A very simple mechanic but it does wonders.

This also exists in squad btw if you want another game with inf dragging mechanics

@@Ferrariic That's a lot less casual though

@@Ferrariic indeed. But for someone who only has so little time to play, I prefer casual BB over hardcore Squad.

Dragging was in the BFV beta, I was also wondering why would you take it out of the final game..

It's not a matter of focus, this could've been done in unreal engine by slightly bigger team. It's a matter of making the game that developers enjoy and give a crap about

They're probably panicking.. Rightfully so!

My brain and eyes are tired of million of details in modern day shooters. Graphics in Battlebit are so refreshing and keep you focused on right things.

I've been saying this for years. Player-world-interaction matters above all-else, an immersive, natural and consistent environment makes the difference, not fancy graphics that you have to re-mortage your house for...

@@jedanPirke "Intruder" is a game on steam that has that kind of design. Gameplay first, best graphics second.

This game has good graphics though it’s just different art style.

Wow, that is such a neat design!

Yh kinda like tarkov if you’ve ever played that

@@korat10 or Sandstorm

It's literally battlefield, squad, and call of duty mixed.

You can also hold R and it will drop a mag you dont have to mash it

The devs try servers under stress with many players. The official game will release with few players with more tactical playstyle

yeah the class is definitely longtime battlefield medic main approved

Bless you kind medic

Where can I play this game? I need it

@@camtheking1022 steam

literally the best time for the game to come out aswell

When it will release tho?

@@michaelmyer8101 you can play it

same bro the devs are really nice

I've never even heard of it before today. I found it this morning. Wow. The animation threw me off in the beginning. But man is this real good. I haven't been this giddy to get onto a game in a long while! Lmfao

how do i download it its not letting me on steam

@@bradd4607 Playtest ended... next playtest is on April 8th.

@@bradd4607 do you get some kind of error message? it worked fine for me

It’s like polybattle in roblox but made much better and with better features

Its not necessarily the graphics that’s different, its the models and assets used that are different

@@tyreese2012 yep

I personally like the blocky look of the game

More fps this way

when someone has a genuine passion to make a good game this is what comes out of it

how did you get to play? i keep getting told the servers are closed and the "open" date keeps getting later and later. just told me right now it will open in 4w days

@@stolenboistudios it stopped 2 days ago. You have to wait 46 days

Yeah I was late to the party as well. It’s unfortunate that we have to wait as of right now but oh well might as well wait

Greetings fellow Mule!

Yes, I wanna see this happen!

The high player count is really terrible on most battlebit maps though

@@lieutenantbl4ck Look up MAG. its a console game that had 256 players and it released back in 2010. It played better than most high count FPS games in the market now.

@jay matthews Yeah, the 60on60 servers have been my favorite for most of the maps. But th 240 servers have been such a laughable gongshow. So much fun

Performance is the biggest problem

@@Midz350i MAG & Planetside 2!

pubg..

I want it for console

Screw AAA graphics. If the visual style allows for stupidly high framerates I'll take that tradeoff. Especially with all these mechanics in one package.

AM I GOOD AT FPS GAMES? 🥺👀

@@CDL_Gaming That's why it would be a dream game

You can drag enemies too? Thought it was just teammates?

Wait it has prox chat as well?! This game has everything!

Yea i think their goal is to be available to low end pc players so that they doesn't have to download tons of giga byte of 32K QHD HQ Graphics

I was looking forward to trying this out... Then saw the 41 day wait.

@@Merrunz what's up with the wait? are they trying to make the servers bigger to account for a bigger gamerbase now or something?

@@Merrunz :( same...

@@AsianRevelation1 Its because this is like an alpha, the game will become early access in a couple of months

Wow, man of culture 👌👍

@@jacktyler58 Good one! lol its always funny how famous quotes are often not even the real quote. thx for the correction

@@jacktyler58 No problem, we both knew what the other was trying to say. cheers

Genuinely mate, all these mechanics with the HD visuals and its a better experience hands down I even like the TTK, the bandages, the extra click on the snipers

dont need the graphics. ill take lower graphics for more performance

@@rambo-cambo3581 if they can fine tune the audio to make it more immersive, it's GG.

dont confuse the developers with the publishers, its the big fish making the atrocious decisions, not the developers.

I think making a game with 2042 visuals is really hard.. takes alot of the development time where as a game like this is very simple to make somewhat.. I bet if dice gavethere engine to these devs they wouldn't be able to make there game work at all unless it's polygons... or if they just make it for next Gen which bf 2042 should of been

@@gamingeuphoria7928 i mean DICE cant even get their own game to work on their own engine so obviously the battlebit devs wouldnt be able to 🤣🤣

Idk about the lazy part tho..

@@gamingeuphoria7928 bf5 and bf1 look better than bf 2042. Stop making excuses, the game just outright sucks

Personally for me the low poly art style is a bonus, plus it runs great on my low end PC

@@fuzzybloodpc9291 I kind of like it as well, has its own kind of charm much like Oldschool Runescape graphics.

Looks like roblox, dont mind it its actually kind of cool

yeah reminds me of Phantom Forces for Roblox, feels similar and i loved that aswell lol

@@fuzzybloodpc9291 supposedly the devs got the inspiration to make this from not being able to run Squad on their low end laptops.

I think that dragging mechanic would be more beneficial for games like BFV, since it’s the battlefield that have the slowest and most risky revive mechanic. In 2042 revive is too fast for anyone to bother to drag anyone to safety

@@hhyperxuserxd2680 Pretty sure it was promised for BFV and was never released.

@Gabriel Reyes im mad that they let bf5 go to make the shtshow of a game...

@@esgozar you are right

Voip, large amount of weapons, mw19s gunsmith system, better destruction than any bf, runs on a toaster, no stupid cosmetics or battle pass or "live service" I tried this game a couple months ago during a playtest didn't think I'd like it cause it's ugly but it's a blast

@@msr9042 dude.. I love the chaos man.. I played it during playtest.. it was so fun.. they needa release it..

there's actually a hardcore gamemode

@Buck honestly with all the turnover at DICE in recent years I don't think they have anyone left who really knows what they're doing.

This game seems like it includes everything legacy DICE did right and removed the BS

AND LESS BUGS TOO !!!

There are many ways to deal with player model visibility Example like Csgo, the player model contrast has higher value compared to the maps hence being easier to spot people despite having the same "dull colour" like the maps

Also means my ancient 980 Ti can probably run this in 4K, so I'm not complaining!

We're gonna have to wait for World War 3 to come out. Hopefully that has destructible environments too

Nah, then I won't be able to play it loll

@@iValkyrie46 why

@@Gaetano.94 system requirements

@@iValkyrie46 lol I got potato laptop as well. This game feels like a blessing to me.

I feel like it doesnt need that

@@AlexD-yb4mp Yeah, it has it's style. And it looks like it woks flawlessly even with such player count on the map. This can be much harder to achieve with more detailed graphics. As well as destruction. Maybe player models could be made mode detailed though.

@@adskiygamer the style is hella bland though, I dont mind low poly models but the lightning and everything is too flat

@13131818 tbf this is only a playtest. Not even an alpha. Hence the colors are a little underdone. Those maps in the fields are really friggin nice though. Great color.

I'm sure it will come. A proper game does the gameplay first and then worries about graphics.

I think the graphics are also playing to their strenghts. With their resources, making a highly textured game with detailed modelling would seriously hamper development of other aspects. So having a simpler and stylized artstyle lets them focus more on the core game. And if that's solid, they can always go back and update models and textures if the game is successful enough.