I like that, Elon era

hello future kidssssss HELLOooOoOOOOOOOOOooo Keep being good, it's worth it

Hello Future we watched this live 💪

@@daniell.6463 or the "Elon epoch"

The cult is real

I really can't get my head around that. It's breathtaking.

progress

Goes to show how how well a software development approach can reduce development time! Go Agile Development :D

When your sole purpose isnt to fill pork barrels for various states, its amazing what you can get done.

@@MichaelNNY It's also people clinging to the idea that blowing up rockets is more of a waste and more expensive than simulations. It's not. It's cheaper, faster and more informative to blow them up. We learn wisdom from failure much more than from success. We often discover what will do, by finding out what will not do; and probably he who never made a mistake never made a discovery. Samuel smiles 1859

Totally,it went from scifi movie to reality crazy fast

Imagine the next 10 years...actualy, I can't, too many great accomplishments, can't even believe it.

Whilst everyone was doubting them.

Fast? We are waiting so many days between testflights. I cant count the days on two hands anymore

@@Robin-Visser Are you serious?

I think Starship needs to prove itself at least a dozen times in a row before we can trust it to safely carry people to Mars. And even after that we better be damn sure we have a solid plan for landing it on Mars, which will be very different than landing it on Earth.

@@muddro420 We will send equipment to Mars prior to sending humans. In all honesty, the landing platform needs to be self-leveling and give cushion with the support of air pistons so that we can aid other craft that may potentially visit.

@@muddro420 Falcon is a proven system that had its own early failures . There is zero doubt that eventually Space X will be able to do anything it wants to

@@BradiKal61 For people who proclaim to be sciency and futuristic, you guys sure lack scientific reasoning. Absolutely? No doubt? Will achieve ANYTHING it wants to? Lmao.

@@caveman4659 what does sciency and futuristic mean ? They're just talking facts. And yes it is possible with enough time. Don't be so pessimistic

They might just try land starship using towers now. No landing flip

@@messyties no, the current model still includes the flip and a vertical landing, it just uses a tower to absorb the landing shock. The horizontal catch you've seen illustrated was only "in an ideal world", basically him just thinking out loud on Twitter one day.

same

I'm in IT and at this point I wouldn't even mind being a janitor at Starbase or even GigaTexas. So many talented minds working for SpaceX and Tesla. I'd love to have conversations with so many folks and share the same passions as I do with them. It's probably some high stress level work but in the end, we measure who we are as humans to what we accomplish in our lives and the other lives around us that we affect and inspire. I can't think of 2 organizations that inspire more than them right now.

@@michaeljmobley Exactly. I currently work in a building/tech field for a global manufacturer. While I love my job, I would love to be a part of human history, and this is the grass roots of how it happens.

@@michaeljmobley Granted, I already work for a company that has created and innovated machines for construction and agriculture. I would love nothing more than to be a small part of a company whose vision is farther than just here.

so Musk decided to go to Mars with his own rocket ?? Question, how he will make rocket that goes in light speed ??

Hi jesus! This got on my timeline just now too!

Ayyy we got Jesus's approval!!!

If that's true, then we really are fooked

Thanks Jesus.

@@OccupyMarsJune no, don’t hide that bong! Change that water, pack that bowl with some fresh bud, and pass it here!

FUD?

@@Juno101 Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt

@@sonicpokemaster1 Ah Thx

@peter I’m guessing you are talking about SN10 and SN11

@@moltenlavaguy9334 SN10 landed, but caught fire and blew up. SN11 landed piece by piece...

Except if your Blue Origin, Boeing, ULA, etc

@@cameronh3260 i mean they dont wantt to make mistakkes they want it just perfect and for that to be even remotely possible they take ages lol

@@alexbenzler5327 "They want to perfect it" but they can't even properly set the clock on the statliner making it miss the ISS and like 90 other software issues that NASA found and that delayed them for almost 2 years

@@cameronh3260 yeh, didn't say it's the best approach haha

Which science fiction movie are you talking about ?

What I can't imagine is the partying they did after a successful landing:-)

They actually would prefer them to explode.

@@JerseyMcgee81 was about to say the data they collected I'm sure was super helpful. Also I'm sure they expected explosions lol

They definetly expected explosions, thats a part of the development process

My bet is SpaceX will have the beginnings of a "spaceport" on the Moon or in orbit around the Sun within five years. This will entice individuals to invest in space business while SpaceX works on the challenge of creating a permanent colony on Mars.

what is the name of the soundtrack?

The music reminds me eve online music.

@@Coyote27981 Mass Effect Too

@@crealidad Also it sounds like WARNO soundtrack.

Yeah it honestly reminds me of the Interstellar music

And last week they stacked the full size rocket system just to test the stacking system, then unstacked to continue the finishing touches.

Nooo way!! Noooooooo waayy!!! THATSS UNREEAL

Eszmeletlen Tömegű Értékű Űripari es Mas Űripari Tények Tanulmany de, MilesTonna &MilesTonnen Voros-Vasercet és egyebek ez és és nem ,,,,, ,,,,,,,†*****$$$$**""; Voros-Vasercet @@✓✓✓£¢€¥¥€¢£√√AstroAsvanyercek az

Mark my word you never will

Maybe i will, maybe i wont…

Sometimes when things seem too impossible it's just a call for a different approach

no

I was thinking the same thing. Life is good when a real world spaceship looks better than CGI lol

I know. Funny how fast things get done when you aren't dependent on the whims of Congress for funding.

I don't think it's almost 400 feet

@@AlexMoreno-zj7po 390 ft

@@AlexMoreno-zj7po dur dur dur

@@dominickwest7558 Isn't that full stack though?

That is the sizs of the full stack (Starship + Super Heavy)

Not exactly especially in the 60s

@@rnichol22 yea nasas rockets kinda sucked after that

@@rnichol22 yeah when they had wernher, who saved their plans to go into space

Spacex have reached the iss nasa reached the moon try again

@@ahmedo7875 Today's NASA/Roscosmos is different from 60s Nasa, 60s USSR

He is far ahead of everyone in the race he invented to distract the attention of fools who poorly taught science in school.

SpaceX is literally only using what the USSR and NASA have developed, and is doing a bad job at it - particularly as a """private""" company.

@@one_step_sideways They built the raptor engine with full closed cycle tech, that wasn't invented by NASA or the USSR.

@@beardedsawyer6322 the guy has problems using a switch i dont think he's someone worth arguing with over this kinda stuff.

Well not everything. His solar program was horrible and it went bust. And I'm not so sure about his autos...we'll see. But in space he's pretty good.

"If they don't blow up, we have to store them somewhere" - also Elon Musk.

❤ I have hearted your comment

Do you know how these Kickstarter scams work? Where they make some prototypes, promis you the world and then turn out to deliver 5% of what they said or nothing at all. This is pretty much how Musk operates and how he runs his businesses, but instead of not delivering, he uses money from the future (new promises) to fund the old a bit more. The experts he hires with money he obtained by lying and misleading, are doing amazing things and deserve the credit. Musk on the other hand, who acts like he is the mastermind behind all the tech, is just a conman with the mindset of a child. He uses B to fund A, C to fund A&B and D to fund A&B&C. The promises for the future need to get bigger and bigger to keep this bubble in tact. (something we are clearly seeing) 90+% of his/his companies capital is money that people invested for future products (or in anticipation for future products). Most of this money however, is being used to keep those first projects from dying (since non of Musk his projects are really economically viable). Ofcourse they can deliver some amazing products to keep people believing in this Musk-scheme, when companies like Tesla are extremely overvalued (due to empty promises for the future) and Musk keeps borrowing money against those assets to fund new projects.

One engine didn't light so it didn't push it as far and it landed short. It's unclear if there was a problem or if it was never started because they had two good engines.

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l they don’t need to light 3 engines to land. They only need 2, I think.

@@squdardt.9719 The new plan is to light three and keep the best two. John twice said they will light three Raptors during the webcast and Elon recently said the plan was light three and land on two at low throttle to allow some margibän with one engine throttling up to 110% if necessary, should one fail right at the end.

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l At the end he said everything was nominal, there wasn't the usual mention of engine relight failure so maybe they changed the plan due to the new starship design

İt did

They see cgi reference materials and think it's trying to trick them

@@quantumblauthor7300 they should just go there and see it in person

@@derrypurnamasari3921 that would require their feet to touch grass