Hazani Mahmoud when billionaires want remake of kerbal space program in real life

Fun fact Elon actually played kerbal space program

And the wind goes... fun fact, space x only uses kerbal to test it’s rockets before launch

Exactly

Im gonna do this IRL.

for every design there's a pile of scrap metal and dead body's

Yep, so many kerbals had to die

Eli Hook nah don’t worry they’re expendable resources

@@jaydenli2125 so many, none ever come back if the take off doesn't fail

I just have Jebediah in a space station so he doesn't die. And also a little tip for new player, trying to enter laythe atmosphere at 7000m/s may warm up your kerbals a bit.

We already have first clip😂😂😂

I see ppl have come back with the same reason lol

@@memesfromdeepspace1075 Lol yeah

I'm looking forward to it

@@memesfromdeepspace1075 oh yeah lol

Litterally sfs.

​@@xane8409 true

I've watched this clip countless times and I still go cheer for that single RCS every time.

@@xane8409 dear god it is

@@xane8409 100% true

@Goth Jesus it doesnt matter It goes back in echonomy ethier way

Actually SpaceX hasn't wasted any money since the original missions didn't fail. The Payload that was put to space reached it's target successfully.

@@amboss5072 yes They were just showing their "Rapid unscheduled dissamply"

@Goth Jesus Thats not the governments money looolll

I mean it happens to every rocket but the ones SpaceX is flying so they might as well use this for a testing opportunity

"Look, it's not an "explosion", it's just a rapid unscheduled disassembly"

This is not expensive 💰💣

They see it as learning - not a failure. A slightly different perspective.

@@Retrohertz Indeed, rockets are NOT easy things to get right, even with the resources SpaceX has on hand. Their first three Falcon 1 launches all went ka-boom for different engineering reasons (and nearly killed the company in the process). And if you look at the Falcon 9 launch record, there's a fair number of ka-booms speckled in there as well. (The saving grace for the Falcon 9 is that most of the losses are re-entering boosters, which are much easier to replace, and not the actual vehicles themselves.)

its*

I have to add: in a row.

@@BasovMichail SpaceX rocket landings are more consistent than any other rocket company/organization's launches.

Falcon 9 is a lot safer than Boeing 737 max 😂...and it goes to space

@@BasovMichail Not quite, there was a single failed langing inbetween.

you mean 211

Just for context the hydraulic cylinders are as wide as a person And the engines are the size of cars The distance between the ground and the bottom of the engines when landed is enough that you could just about drive a car under it Those yellow railings are probably about chest height

@@JQ3B94 Didn't realize they were that huge, does explain the level of force involved. Still just as hilarious though.

​@kegmonkey5648 you can go stand right next to a Falcon 9 first stage at the California HQ. It's out by the sidewalk. Absolutely massive but nothing compared to superheavy. Those take a bit more effort to see but still out in the open.

And thats with empty tanks!

​@@Chuckiele Near-empty, yeah. The one that ran out of propellant still blew up, just not as violently

.

..

...

....

No u

With thermal expansion

And a boom

This is iconic to me

LOL!!!

Best quote ever

Your DP is potato.

Elon: "Haha, this money could've fed starving African children with AIDS" Servant: "Wait so, it could've fed AIDS to starving African children or it could've fed starving African children who have AIDS? Elon: "Yes"

@@StephenDelRosario777 So how much have you donated to starving African children with AIDS?

@@Willaev lol you need to learn what a joke is, it's not a funny joke, but it's clearly a joke

@@StephenDelRosario777 bruh thats Bill Gates's work. But sadly, looking from how people have treated him recently. I doubt he will ever do that again

Chuckling to himself as the candle burns away.

What if he did? What would be the difference if it was daylight? I don't get it.

@@MrPatrickDunn he'd be tackin away on the keyboard, guffawing and joint in hand with DMT on coming shortly

Pat gonna get wooshed

@@sloth1021 '-' WTF New comments after 2 years

Right!!

And that too in a sarcastic humour 🤣

Now they do it consistently.

Right!!!! Glad to see more of what the future of SpaceX does!!!

Of which there are plenty.

Billions*

Lol wut

Fenestrane Ladderane millions*

@@patrickgracias5782 10s of millions*

MrLastlived hundreds of millions*

Yess. Oh and hello Patrick!

lmao

Lol

LoLzZ

With what Elon Musk has been able to accomplish , all of this is acceptable... Thumbs up.

⭒و̴̜͖̯̣͚̲͕̙͕̮̥͕̭̪̼̀ͅڢ́̀͏̴يي̸̵͢͜ڢ̶͢͠ ! س̀͢͡͠҉م͘͝ي̸̵͢͜ي̸̵͢͜ڢ̶͢͠ي̡ي̸̵͢͜چ̶҉و҉̴̧̕͜

Lol yet nasa denies that what destroyed one of their spacecraft's was orbital lightning not bashing them just clarifying that sometimes they have no idea what they are doing.

Because they dont want people get angry on where their taxes go

NASA wouldn't do that

Yes. Failure is a good thing. It means you GET to improve, not HAVE to improve. SpaceX knows this.

Because NASA is an incompetent tax wasting bullshittery

AGREED

I call it failure. Highly successful failure. I stored this video into my personal favorite list. And watched it a few times. What's wring with me?

All of these "failures" have put a payload into orbit before.

Well ift2 went much better

@@user-ce7ic1ze2u And journalists spun it again as an "massive failure" despite the huge improvements to design and performance

@@WaaDoku yeah, putting it that way somehow gets more attention than “starship’s second ift had noticeable improvements over the last one” and IDK why

XD

XDD

XDDD

XDDDD

XDDDDD

Lol, this is the best comment XD

lmao

Hey zam! fancy seeing you here ;)

Wait a minute... I just lit a rocket... ROCKETS EXPLODE!!!

lol, what qoute was that from again?

Well, the first ones weren’t on land, so they technically watered

@@Frostigerhund1793 Well, at those speeds, you can technically say landed too

Well not at 0:18😂

@@keithhansmann8616 I landed with a summersault. 10 out of 10.

666 likes and I'm here to ruin it

Lol

Elon actually confirmed on Twitter that he did most of the editing himself

@@nl20842 yup...and also Elon is the one who actually lost money, not the intern

Interns worship the guy

@@prolly537 yup...and also Elon is rich af

I think my favorite part is at 0:46. -Rocket touches down gently. -Rocket slowly tips over. -Big explosion and lots of destruction. -Debris -Camera is blown over and a massive fireball passes over. -Burning debris -Complete and utter fiery destruction. I also like when they actually land it successfully.

@@thermophile2106 i like this small little rcs booster trying to hold the booster upright😂

That's Elon for you

Bob! Told you not to drink that Rocket fuel again.

they're like the size of the statue of liberty

OzzyOscy lmao😂

R.I.P Bob Ross

Is Space X the real Apperture Science?

@@MrBao-yt7bk yes!

Savageify obviously? that's literally what the comment was referencing

me

ayy me too

Me

Me

Me 😂😂

That's why i love it

LemBerg1715 ever hred of the USSR’s space program

You guys do know Spacex gets most of its funding from nasa right.

breadboi * Illuminati confirmed *

@@theredbaron1309 But Elon owns over 50% of all shares in the company i believe. And by funding, they hire space x for missions correct? so its basically paying for services.

Defective Turret 😂😂 every time!

Well, imagine. There are kilos fuel in there

pieter welkers the rocket used its fuel to get to the upper atmosphere, then went back and landed. It probably had not much fuel left but loads of compressed gas

@@barbecuedchicken2894yea thats what i mean

pieter welkers then I must have misconstrued your words. I apologize

like the old youtube videos about destroying iphones but at a large scale and a price of thousands of phones

Dozens of millions, lol.

You can almost see Elon's troll face in this.

To be fair, this is an excellent way to put those lost dollars to good use in the publicity department. This is actually really clever thinking, exactly what I would expect from Elon's kitchen.

I think you're an order of magnitude off

privatezeron They had that before. They wouldn’t have sent them up without a lot of testing. Still historic of course.

@@lexxihd5843 Is funny how there is always someone like you who has to make like little negative comments and then just say "but still good" -_-

@@AGriffith how's that a negative comment from the guy? Ahah... The only funny thing here is your IQ

Yeah whatever dude, 134 for me, what about yours? Don't talk shit of someone who you don't know, my comment wasn't disrespectful, I said his comment was negative, and you come talking that kind of trash without knowing me? Think twice before saying those dumb comments.

I came here after that too lol

A more modern exemple is starship, everyone is clowning starship because it "failed"on the firsts 2 launches

@@Paep50 EXACTLY! I can't wait to come back to all the comments where people said they would fail. Love to rub it in. They'll probably find something else to complain about, though.

*Highest budget tik tok

@Clement Wong No, TikTok has 1 min limit.

More budget than yt rewind for sure

Where do you guys find up with these comments

No 9/11 is like 750 million$ but one rocket is more than a billion dollars

Me: "lol it combusted"

@@barackyip3286 no it spontaneously combusted

@@Gneisenau. has it lemons onboard

@@TheGlitch93 m maybe

omg this comment is sooooooooo underrated lmfao

I think it would be better to feature the first RUD as the first video in the upcoming 'How Not To Land a Starship'.

Mr Beast is sad

That’s Very True

Space oddity cover by Chris Hadfield cost at least 150 billion to make

@@mehfff do you get to count the space station as a cost for that though?

Mr beast hold my beer

never seen an astronaut in a booster

@@schwanktest you must be fun at parties

Even if it was a landing like that the emergency separation would launch them to safety!

@@rosez6737 But he is right. There was many bosters failtures but no so many deaths.(Current death ratio is 3,2%)

@@sandwichdonut6169Read the dicuscion up there. The hell you dont understand? Id you want to call someone stupid be sure that you are right.

Lmao

Hahahahahaha

No. kerbal space program is for mentally challenged

@@T--kq3pj go land on the moon and get back with no tutorial then

@@Jimskateuk i can't, NASA destroyed the technology, but Mars i can deffo do

Haha

Congrutulations to the funniest comment i saw

Wait no elon you need that landing leg

Actually it was 600,000$

@@OnlyMisery How about this rocket booster

stop nobody wants too see this right now

They were not hidden the news left it in the passed

@@Andyou_3 Why not?

@Matthew Williams dude he’s just saying something nice.

@@Andyou_3 Why are you being so negative?

Tag! Bot ya!

IkLms11 I don’t think he fires people for mistakes as long as they’re working towards a solution. He might not be a good guy but he’s not stupid

IkLms11 pretty sure that is a good way to not learn from your failures.

It reminds me of Thomas Edison saying he found 2,000 ways to not make a light bulb. Now, lights are everything.

In the words of NASA, on Murphy's Law: "Murphy... was an optimist."

this is not a launch failure. Every single one of these missions were successful in completing their mission objective

Well 2 technically

@@razeke5499 i just heard that the center core tipes over while transporting to Cape,, that's so unfortunate, but just like Elon said, TECHNICALLY IT DID LAND, BUT NOT ARRIVED IN ONE PIECE,,, lol😅

@@OTNAYITPES 😂😂

@@razeke5499 I watched the livestream... they did it. Landet 3 booster in one mission

@@PringlesUnleashed I heard they lost the booster's core.

"Hold my flame thrower"

Hahaha

Hold my elon musk

@@FS-me8mj *elon musket*

you meant hold my rocket

"investors" ah yes, nasa, my favourite private company.

Well it's unfortunate, but obviously NASA is funded by taxpayer money. Failure is a risky word in politics, no wonder they cannot risk it all to victory unlike SpaceX

@@nzredwolf4048 you could call taxpayers investors

@@Helena-me6mp Taxpayers are more like slaves than investors. It's because we don't have a choice XD

@@robberbarron7602 i mean... you could leave the country, although that might be an extreme step XD

MineCraftBoi 69 That’s more like China or Japan

Jedediah Kerman government vs private entities, and you should read foreign news more often.

@@denrimi NASA tends to be public about failures, while the CCP tends to be hush hush in its space program in regards to short comings and failures.

NASA informs the public of all failures and successes.

Only one silent about failures is Russia. Because if anyone knew the ridiculous reasons and the volume of failures- they’d be even more of a laughingstock to the world then they already are.

No, they made millions of dollars each time, delivering a customers payload successfully. They were all used, and everybody else in history who's used a rocket just lets it fall and splash into pieces.

John Frazer ok boomer

John Frazer I would put r/wooosh, but it’s so overused

You see They actually enjoy explosions. So if it's a big boom They don't care about wasting money

Matthias George too* boomer

Thats why its called a Go PRO. You gotta be able to withstand anything if you want good footage

@@cherrydragon3120 How does he know that it's Go Pro

\*Cue The Go Pro ads\*

Guccicurry you need to see the king of random video, he dipped 2 go pros in to liquid nitrogen

Arri Alexa be like: Am i a joke to you?

Just like xbox with their ‘tower of power’ or fridge and well idk elon musk and xbox are really embracing memes

Whoever made this video, cleary had fun with it, yeah.

@@niyazzmoithu20 no they are mis calculations but can be tests with those mis calculations being on purpose. I dont think successfully landing and re using a rocket but radar fails and an explosion be a test.

Its really not a "mistake", per se. They're constantly experimenting and testing their aircrafts. Trial and error you could say. Every failure gets them one step ahead on their next test

They are not mistakes. They are rapidly unscheduled disassemblys.

Cough cough starship

@@1ronEntertainment still in testing phase. perfectly normal. name another rocket the f9 that has such a high success rate.

14/03/2024 update: this did not aged well 🤡

@@adrienlmps3744 wrong rocket bruh

Tesla model Jebediah

Oh, Dear Leader Please show kindness to our puny souls.

Revert to vehicle assembly building

No shit sherlock

When I see this listed in the comments, it has 729 likes. When I tap on it to open the replies, it goes to 732. Seriously, UKposts?

From the same guy that put his car in orbit.

no elon is the editor

They probably uploaded this video so they can earn back the money lost from the revenue they earn from this video.

@@onebeeeliondollars6672 I don’t think they monetize this channel.

@@DVeck89 They have 5.5M subs. Maybe but you're right maybe they didn't monetize the channel.

Explosive happy accidents

ur pic made me think i had dog hair on my screen

**minutes** why do i smell smoke?

@@gutdrago350 dude, right as I read this, I smelled smoke. no joke.

Imagine that was said for 9-11

Everything you said is so accurate 😂😂

Top Gear!!!

Let's do this shot again

Man of culture...

Anyway, back to the studio

I mean it can’t be helped. The damage was already done and progress was made. They learned their lesson and moved on.

Wtf lost money ? You need those failure to succes.

@@ejacquem1587 *failures to succeed

DenstepGamer thanks to correct me, english is not my mother tongue :p

Well, usually these rockets would have burned up/crashed anyway, so they didn`t realy pay anywhere near full price for that.

should have been hold my beer but still amazing

Elon musk middle school test was like: ukposts.info/have/v-deo/pHOda39up6SYkWw.html

Except Elon didn't make it

It only show when it landed so I thi k it must of been the last video clip

Will come when they did a successful landing in the future.

It will be twice the fun, since Starship has two parts that lands.

This comment will blow up once they upload it 5 years later

I cannot wait! 😄❤

How not to land a “Super Heavy” Booster... it’s heavy isn’t it?

😂😂😂

MrBeast next day: Person who holds on to the rocket for longest gets 100k

Hold my RP-1

Random XD

Or not

It'll pound right out.

@@cascade5682 wow thanks

Isn't Elon Musk 50% owner of SpaceX?

The captions definitely sounded like his sense of humour.

Lê Toàn Well that basically explains most of the video. South Africans have a thing for violent explosions and appropriate music

Ryan Olivier Who doesn't?

How do you know? can't find anything

LOOOOOOOL

*R A B I D*

OOOF

He stole that from Kerbal Space Program

pepega

"hehe boom". Nicely put :D

Welp, that fuck up was the most expensive yet coolest fuck up ever.

you uwu

Not _UwU nonononono it’s: SpaceX: hehehe big boom lol

underrated

Naah dude, I think all the 9/11 videos are more expensive

Tell that to the Vietnam War videos!

Jannib Andelo Bayutas Vietnam was a war. 9/11 was a movie.

@@WA_58 Do you are have stupid?

An rainy Don’t be that naive. Start thinking and make some research about this mystification. Money, money money...

And the A-10 Thunderbolt go BRRRRRRRRRTTTTT

Fk Dude you make me Laugh ... Well Played sir Well Played

Dani fans here . Nice me also

Wish they used parachutes

Loooooolllll

Yesssssssssss !!

The fact that i've seen this kind of comment makes it more hilarous

@@wildanh7806 the fact that I have seen this kind of replies makes it more hilarious

And you know what? This shows that Elon Musk can show his faliures... because its okay to fail...

@Google Account we always need that guy, so thank you for rendering your service. If you like you can use me as a reference when you apply for the CEO of That Guy Inc.

I would say that, but this is landing a rocket booster and starship is just launching one

@@thedarkwaterbun They did successfully launch this most recent one, remember when they were first designing the falcon they almost lost the entire company. It took them longer to do more basic things such as stage separation, which they have now mastered, and can easily repeat on all of their spacecraft that are similar to the first iteration. (Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy) while Starship is brand new and isn't really being designed off of an existing rocket, and for their second test, they've done pretty good, imo. So far, their second test on the starship went better than the second test on their Falcon 1.

you mean unmanned 😭😭

@@tha1oneasianguy The worst case coud be "manned before the landing, and unmanned as a result of it". I hope we will never see such type of landing!