More like level 0

FBI OPEN UP

Level 7: The machine explains machine learning to you.

Level 8: Machine explain to machine

Level 9: machine explains to supercomputer.

Amateur

You won't recognize her in 15 years.

Wdym?

@@pogboy537 bc she said she wants to be a spy

@@ammiren2294 abhi dekha aage ka maaf karde dost

Ya because the term "machine learning" is way overloaded and basically a buzzword lool

Me too lol!

Haha I am a junior in high school I want to do machine learning soo what subjects do I need to pick

@@cyberturk2537 you must learn fundamentals of computer science, python or any programming language with which you can do ML and concepts of maths like matrices, probability etc

@@pranushaaa thanks man appreciate it

agree

Of course she is, in her normal day, she has to teach a machine to learn and that's way harder...

@@kodex7795 you are stupid

im the 1000th like :D

imagine if she is an AI herself XD kidding. couldnt resist.

Eh, Level 4 was also just chatting. She asked the student about her interests and opinions but she didn't explain much of anything.

not much you can teach to a phd working in the exact field, you just exchange what you know and what they know

There are hundred machine learning approaches for text predicting. Of course, you can't just talk about it without spending months researching and evaluating the effectiveness

I mean it's always like that because what do you want to explain to someone who potentially knows more than you

They cut the grad student questions because they were too advanced.

Theres a specific glow in the faces when people talk about stuff they enjoy or have interest in them

Sapiophile.

Me too

@Jason so what? what actually is your issue with that? Ask yourself that question.

If only smart people run the world. Maybe someday in future we have all evolved to this level of intelligence.

Mashallah

When I put a female student in my Data Science Masters on to Hillary Mason, she really lit up. She had some self limiting beliefs about women being good at Data Science and when I used Hillary as an example of a top Data Scientist it shattered that limitation in her mind.

@@user-qn3vt8ih2p نعم.

I noticed a lot of women going to data science why do they love it literally in every content went to even family members noticed a lot of women into Data science more than other fields in the CS space

She is both. They are very closely related at least in my university.

Didnt even notice they where all girls

Go for it! We need more diverse voices in this field. I can't wait to see what you create. Good luck!

@@astrovation3281 lol I only noticed near the end

@@rayankubur6054 It is great seeing people having succes indeed, good luck in college 👍

Omg yes do it! I’m a woman in CS going through college right now, it’s difficult but rewarding! I believe in you!

😂😂😂

Lol

Is that a reference to Spy Cat movies? :)

should have thought long term and said she wanted to be a drug dealer

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Well done Lucy, you did great! Good luck in school 👍

If you don’t mind my asking, what was the process like of getting cast to be in this? Was it through school, or a casting agency, or something else? That’s something I always wonder about while watching these videos

You seemed interested during the interview. Good job

good luck for 10th grade and congrats on finishing 9th grade! You've done so well

You are very smart

Mostly people who are really good at something are focused on that, not their ego or how they look to others. The latter is just a tool for doing more of what they love.

This is true but there was this one time a "Nobel prize winner physicist" who works with lasers came on. I don't wanna sound bitter cause if I won a Nobel prize I would tell everyone but yoooh. The lady overdid it for me... a bit

Yeah, the best kind of professionals :)

Hah!

Python is the Swiss army knife of programming languages, and it doesn't rust.

lol

When studying as an adult, I want to start with why first but often they don’t want to do that 😂

@@CertifiedRetard-gz6mi why?

@@fallenIights the question is too scary, really.

Profound well put statement 👌

Drax was an enlightened mind all along.

I mean... she teaches computers so why wouldn't she be able to teach a child??

@@ajtmove4226 oh, yea.... Forgott that, but makes sens XD

@@ajtmove4226 a person can be incredibly smart but not know how to teach those things to people, not every biologist can explain his stuff to a kid so they understand. "Teaching computers" is a weird way of explaining what this woman does and isn't even close to teaching a child or teen.

*actually.

well, I mean, she used to the process of explaining these to an angel investor u know?

I didn't even notice that it was all women

I have a strong feeling the makers love being inclusive omfg

AI safety is a major branch of safety engineering - the safety management conferences I go to always have a lot of papers on challenges and research in the field. It does have a way to go yet, though, yes.

@@berryk.4174 It was obviously intentional

@@stt.9433 I did, can’t help but imagine the backlash if it were all men instead

No, the main difference is humans kill everything, thats the difference between humans and all other life.

@@simplylethul Cats basically try to kill anything they can, and will often play with their half-dead victims

@@simplylethul You should see how cats behave in heat

@@simplylethul Okay, cool

@@freeshavaacadooo1095 facts are...facts.

Hilary is also exceptional at voice fry, so my ears hurt now. The college student had a very comfortable voice.

It’s called Social Engineering.

Mashallah

@@polymath6475 bro ur balding so bad 😭😭😭

@@bassou28jpg i do not trust her at all based off what the companies she runs does.

👏👏 noticed this towards the end and whether intentionally or not, such a bunch of inspiring women!

I’m a woman in STEM. If it makes you feel better, any discrimination I faced as a woman and a mom, was seriously eclipsed by the discrimination I’ve faced since becoming disabled courtesy of a very selfish driver.

@@MiriamTheGreat I dont want to be rude or anything but u have never faced discrimination as a women. Idk y u say that. I dont know any dude that goes around looking at women as inferior. I think u have been lied to and told that u should be given everything and anything and if they say no than that means they r discriminating against u cause ur a women

@@uncomfortabletruths7990Yeah that is rude lol, you scream of someone who doesn’t talk to women in the real world, let alone listen to them. For that reason, do you ever think that maybe YOU are projecting because YOU are the person looking down on women?

@@firstlast-wg2on How does me stating a fact that she never faced discrimination for being a women mean I havent talked to women?😂low iq comment. Go back to making mario youtube vids lmaoo. Cant believe a nerd like u can even speak like this to someone. U would never say this shi in real life

Yeah exactly what I thought. She made some really interesting observations I wouldn't have guessed she'd try to make. She's going places!

Right

Mashallah

I knew that at 15. Its normal

@@folkrav I knew that at 15. Its normal

Somebody still has the code the bigger picture, but with so many libraries, and tools being so readily available, people barely really write their own code anymore.

"coding" has always been secondary, archiecture has always been the primary focus of literallu everything.

In my CS program its been heavily implied that lookin at the bigger picture structure first makes the coding easier, Its like outlining an essay vs writing it on the fly.

That's always been the case, and is a general rule in engineering. What she's talking about is specific to Machine Learning in the sense that, a decade ago it was still mostly an academic pursuit and they were simply trying to figure out how to approach the problem i.e. how to translate the mathematics to code and optimize the running because after all the code runs on millions of data points and it had to be optimized as much as it can. Now it'll all about getting the end result right, because the basic platform has been mostly laid correctly, and more so because the results are being used for real-life application. So, getting them right is the big problem now.

i second this

Mathematician explains Inter universal teichmüller theory to a child

CIA: “Write that down, write that down!”

@@user_2793 Lmao, maybe get Mochizuki on here.

I love math, but that is what's so frustrating about it sometimes. Today's research papers are so specialized and their only applications are to other branches of math, I bet they wouldn't even be able to explain it to an undergrad math major. Imagine explaining class field theory to someone who's just barely seen groups.

To be fair, she was a very smart teen! 😂

Lol how is it possible? ,even on undergraduate computer science students know the basic of machine learning let alone PHD students .

I mean if they couldn't understand the child level explanation they weren't tipsy they were thoroughly drunk

I'm imagining them bringing in a drunken homeless man and it makes me laugh

@@nathanbruce1992 Write a persuasive letter

Drunk Science

The only problem with discussion in philosophy is, eventually you both just reach opinion, never fact.

@@sliceofbread29yrago52 that's true of almost every field, including STEM

There is interesting discussion by J Krishnamurti during 80s ukposts.info/have/v-deo/pHGUZmOOaKeEwmw.html

@@sliceofbread29yrago52 That's incorrect. At the most fundamental level there are undeniable truths (not even facts). The realm of metaphysics with application of the most fundamental logical axioms (fundamental epistemology) can move you in a direction that is rigorous at the most fundamental level of philosophical debate. Whether you accept those facts is dependent if you agree with the logic. But if the logic is intrinsic and thus axiomatic, then not adhering to said logic will show itself in fallacies down the road. Certain philosophies are factually incorrect because they rely on axioms that are based on nothing but faith (like Altruism as a core in many ethical and political philosophies). By faith I'm not referring only to a higher power/religion, although that is a fairly popular example. If the answer to your axioms when asked "why?" is "because" rather than a proper rigorous answer, then it is fallacious at its core. What I explained right now is not something that most people accept in higher education philosophy which I think is absurd since it's something anyone can confirm for themselves with various simple thought experiments, so I wouldn't expect a Wired video of this type to be good at all.

@@SiMeGamer I'm nowhere near stoned enough to understand your comment brother. - Could you tell me one of these "Undeniable Truths" please. Il put a good word in for you with the big guy downstairs 🔥👹🔥

Cute and smart!

Everybody gangsta til she said: “It’s earthling”

@ K S lmfaoo

@@KS-mxh lol technically all animals are earthlings

At some point you turn Super Saiyan and you are beyond the technical where you just see the bigger picture.

Yes most of the time we have to look for what we are building how it will be perceived and how should it be...

The expert discussion is a branch of computer science called HCI (human computer interaction)

Well as u progress, you play more of a managerial role rather than technical

Basically the difference between a Junior and a Senior.

Imagine AI in another 25 years

I studied computer science over 40 years ago. It has come a long way.

Although many of the main model architectures of deep learning already existed ~25 years ago: standard neural networks (80s), convolutional neural networks (80s), LSTMs (90s). It was mostly just the computation that was lacking to be able to train these models. And the big advancement in the last few years has been the transformer architecture (2017). Transformers are the future (for now), and are behind most media coverage stories lately, like GPT-3 and Codex!

"As soon as it works, no one calls it AI any more." - John McCarthy

A decade ago, AI was about human-like robots rather than the whole concept of independent intelligence.

I noticed that as well. The teen was very into it and was easy going and curious, it was great to see that

I'm assuming you absorbed this information with a nice warm cup of tea in hand. :-)

@@s0dfish110 Coffee :D

I have my first ML class tommorow!

I'm watching this before going to my Machine Learning class. I have a midterm next week. Hopefully the professor asks more about definitions than the math and statistics cuz they be hard.

How? It's a tree.

What?

Terrible analogy

Jk guys. I think what he saying is that the branches of the trees lowered because of the weight of the fruit giving the impression that is bowing, and therefore being humble.

Not a bad analogy just bad execution “The tree laden with fruits always bends low. If you wish to be great, be lowly and meek.” - Ramakrishna Paramahamsa

The cut is everything

lol you're taking the opinions of a few grumpy people and countering it with one kid - gotta think in terms of datascience ;)

such an adorable kid :D

@@anywallsocket I'm gonna be honest, I have no idea what point you're trying to make 🤔

@@MandosaWright i'm saying the r value of an argument like that is crap lol

@@TheDayDreamingOwl i think i can understand what your trying to say but the emojis make it confusing

where have you been lately Capt. Obvious :)

shes creating them bro.

How cliche

Maybe utopian, not dystopian.

hahaha exactly !

She's a super bright kid with how she analyzed things. I was never that descriptive with my sentences when I was 6.

I think wired pickup a really smart and enthusiastic for the topic kids iin all off these videos not just random picked kids. Obviosly the key point is the kids must be interested in the topic such as biology or math ets

@@muhammadihsan4896 Yeah, I don’t know how they go about casting these videos, but I’d imagine they ask local school teachers/administrators to identify kids who are bright and curious and would be comfortable on-camera

What are your thoughts?

Its not for everyone x.x dw homie

Oh my god 😂

OMG definitely should do that, that's a whole new level

I guess you are not invited

But John Douglas already did that... Joking, ofcourse.

My father will hear about this!

Why?

That's exactly the problem. Choosing people based on genitals, instead of competence. Sexist !

@@alokbaluni8760 so what? If women are not interested in these fields why is this an issue?

@@earthysophie by now you mean somewhere around 1917 when equality was established e.g. in Soviet Russia?

@@earthysophieI don’t think that’s true at all, women def are capable of becoming computer scientist ,I believe that they are just less interested in this topic compared to men ,maybe in the future will change.

My CS class: 3 females and 50 males

Our was 12 girls and 50 boys... computer science engineering needs to be promoted into females life... they just like maths not for me machines not for me... coz the surroundings never encouraged

Yeah for me as well and my understanding of this topic is pretty basic. But because they were mainly chatting about the current landscape and what the future beholds, without going into actual technical detail, it was all pretty good to understand

Their talk wasn't technical

They were probably told to keep technicals to a minimum.

She's an AI.

I actually recently learned she's one of the first Data Scientists and one of the most well-known today. So I agree with you she's 'really smart', and would even say those two words don't start to do her justice.

I think she meant more general adoption of ML in agriculture, and use at governmental levels to predict loss stoppage and population need, etc. It's still pretty niche and limited in scope in ag.

IRL the test has problems you haven't seen before and will test two or more concepts you've seen before simultaneously combined in novel ways (synthesis) to test your understanding of the concepts themselves...

@@thighdude7 Which is WAY better than just regurgitating information and a lot more important too. Almost everyone can just learn some vocabulary or learn how to solve the derivative of x^2 but actually applying the principles is what is really important to show that you actually understood what you studied.

Ironic, considering the the female bias in this video 🤣

@@musashi939 I mean, I don't think it's a problem in this case. It's a presentation and I think showing capable women in a traditionally male dominated field is a positive thing.

@@WilliamChan I just thought it was funny. Talking about data bias in machine learning while only having women on the video,.

@musashi939 Is gender really a data point at this time? I think we have far bigger fish to fry then worrying about the orientation of whose catching and the catch itself.

Asking the wrong question. The question is "is she hot?"

For a kid level not an adult.

Reinforcement learning

How cool! At what university if you don’t mind me asking?