CPU vs GPU vs TPU vs DPU vs QPU

  Переглядів 1,502,059

Fireship

Fireship

8 місяців тому

What's the difference between a CPU and GPU? And what the heck is a TPU, DPU, or QPU? Learn the how computers actually compute things in this quick lesson.
#computerscience #tech #programming
💬 Chat with Me on Discord
/ discord
🔗 Resources
Learn more about CPUs cpu.land
CPU in 100 Seconds • How a CPU Works in 100...
Math for Programmers • 10 Math Concepts for P...
JS Worker Threads • PROOF JavaScript is a ...
🔥 Get More Content - Upgrade to PRO
Upgrade at fireship.io/pro
Use code YT25 for 25% off PRO access
🎨 My Editor Settings
- Atom One Dark
- vscode-icons
- Fira Code Font
🔖 Topics Covered
- What is a CPU architecture?
- ARM vs x86-64
- CPU versus GPU
- Why are GPUs so fast?
- Why do you need a GPU?
- What is a DPU?
- Quantum computing basics
- How are silicon chips made?

КОМЕНТАРІ: 1 600
@HerrMustermann
@HerrMustermann 8 місяців тому
When you introduce CPU, GPU, TPU, DPU, and QPU at a party, CPU says 'I'm versatile', GPU says 'I'm visual', TPU says 'I'm trending', DPU says 'I'm data-centric', and QPU? Well, it's quantum; it knows all the answers, but when you look at it, it just says 'Maybe...'
@cosmos0909
@cosmos0909 8 місяців тому
@ikedacripps
@ikedacripps 8 місяців тому
Maybe…
@madhououinkyoma
@madhououinkyoma 8 місяців тому
Nice try
@RADIT-ip3eq
@RADIT-ip3eq 8 місяців тому
So, schrodingus processor?0
@Marginal0
@Marginal0 8 місяців тому
When you compare CPU, GPU, TPU, DPU, and QPU to superheroes, CPU is like Batman, GPU is like Superman, TPU is like Flash, DPU is like Cyborg, and QPU? Well, it’s quantum; it’s like Doctor Strange, but when you ask it to save the world, it just says ‘There are 14 million possibilities…’
@gemma2901
@gemma2901 8 місяців тому
man, you are so good at explaining things and combining memes. prodigy.
@fackarov9412
@fackarov9412 8 місяців тому
he uses QuantumAI to fack our minds, thats why
@tedzards509
@tedzards509 8 місяців тому
1:29 was indeed a glorious commentary of what we have become.
@monkey-mike_xyz
@monkey-mike_xyz 8 місяців тому
THIS. He's the man .
@daem0n1ze
@daem0n1ze 8 місяців тому
his that guy?
@weabowoshi
@weabowoshi 8 місяців тому
savant
@user-tj9gj2wx5d
@user-tj9gj2wx5d 8 місяців тому
Multicore CPUs aren't the reason why we can run multiple applications at once. Operating systems could do that long before multicore CPUs were a thing. The technology which allows that is called process scheduling. The OS is basically switching between the running applications giving each of them a fraction of time (many times per second) to execute whatever code they are currently running. Having multiple cores just allows the OS to handle multiple processes more efficiently.
@kkounal974
@kkounal974 8 місяців тому
He means computing in true parrarel not context switching
@iwikal
@iwikal 8 місяців тому
@@kkounal974 He literally said at 3:02 that "modern CPUs also have multiple cores which allows them to do work in parallel, which allows you to use multiple applications on your PC at the same time". I'm all for benefit of the doubt, but anyone who doesn't already know about context switching is gonna leave this video thinking single core processors can't multitask.
@SahilP2648
@SahilP2648 8 місяців тому
Right but the difference between single core and now multicore processors is that instead of scheduling instructions of multiple applications on the same core, you can execute them on whichever core is available, provided the instructions don't require context.
@kanakTheGold
@kanakTheGold 8 місяців тому
until multicore came into reality, OS could on time share the slices of different threads, it truly became parallel processing only with the muitiple pipelines of multi-core architecture.
@ChrisPepper1989
@ChrisPepper1989 7 місяців тому
Was coming here to say exactly that lol Also it's very important to distinguish between multiple processes and multiple applications. Because a single application can (and often will) have multiple processes that if all running on one core still have to be time shared. That's why the wizards have to ensure they use all cores if they want to get the best out of the CPU. Which of course means that you might be running multiple applications, that all use multiple cores. So the time sharing the OS does is still super important
@vb6code
@vb6code 7 місяців тому
I asked the GPT to explain that video to my dog, he said, Explaining this to a dog might be a bit challenging since dogs don't understand complex technical concepts. However, you can use simple actions and treats to represent these concepts: 1. **CPU (Central Processing Unit)**: Show your dog a treat (representing a task) and then give it to them. CPUs are like you, the treat giver, handling everyday tasks. 2. **GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)**: Take a ball (representing a fun task), throw it, and encourage your dog to fetch it. GPUs are like a friend who helps with fun and sporty tasks. 3. **TPU (Tensor Processing Unit)**: Place a puzzle in front of your dog and watch them solve it (or attempt to). TPUs are like a clever friend who's great at solving puzzles. 4. **DPU (Data Processing Unit)**: Show your dog their leash (representing a connection) and take them for a short walk. DPUs are like a friend who helps you connect with others and stay safe during walks. 5. **QPU (Quantum Processing Unit)**: Okay, this one's tricky! Pretend to be a magician and hide a treat in one hand. Then, show both hands and let your dog choose. Sometimes the treat appears, sometimes it doesn't (representing quantum unpredictability). Remember, dogs won't grasp these concepts fully, but it can be a fun and interactive way to spend time with your furry friend! 🐶🐾
@satyamanu2211
@satyamanu2211 5 місяців тому
This is fucking underrated and brilliant
@bilaltaj1725
@bilaltaj1725 4 місяці тому
k@@satyamanu2211
@whimsicalkins5585
@whimsicalkins5585 2 місяці тому
I am crying 😭
@zenta12
@zenta12 2 місяці тому
"Furry friend"
@ahmadal_shanqeety802
@ahmadal_shanqeety802 Місяць тому
Wow that's actually awesome! Never thought Chat gbt is that useful
@MrAcuriteOf1337
@MrAcuriteOf1337 8 місяців тому
The thing with Quantum Computers is that, basically, you can take a function, feed it literally every possible input in one go, retrieve every possible output simultaneously, and then sample from that statistically to tell you things about the function. It's incredibly niche, and super hard to actually build, and we're not even sure how many problems can actually be accelerated with it, but it's fun to work through the Math for.
@FingerinUrDaughter
@FingerinUrDaughter 8 місяців тому
the thing with quantum computers is, theyre complete fucking nonsense, and not even an actual idea beyond "what if unlimited power?"
@ra2enjoyer708
@ra2enjoyer708 8 місяців тому
Don't quantum computers also get super fucked by background noise (much like anything involving quantum physics)? This reduces their usefulness to basically running in specific spots of outer space, assuming it can survive all the chaotic background radiation with no effect on its function.
@joankim123
@joankim123 8 місяців тому
it's true that you feed it all inputs, but you actually just get one output, like a normal computer. And then there's some incredibly complex math to statistically correlate repeated outputs with the true answer you want.
@FingerinUrDaughter
@FingerinUrDaughter 8 місяців тому
@@ra2enjoyer708 they dont do anything, because they dont actually exist.
@user0K
@user0K 8 місяців тому
@@joankim123 yea, as far as I remember it would collapse the quantum function, but you can choose specific parameters to be matching the required values. Basically, give me values for arguments of the function, which would result in the wanted result. Prolog 2.0 lol.
@HerrMustermann
@HerrMustermann 8 місяців тому
Seems like we have a family reunion here: CPU, the brainy one, GPU, the artist, TPU, the specialized smarty-pants, DPU, the traffic controller, and QPU, the one who says he's working, but you're always unsure because he lives in multiple realities!
@someguy9175
@someguy9175 8 місяців тому
the QPU is just the pot head
@iluvpandas2755
@iluvpandas2755 8 місяців тому
could not be better said
@DemPilafian
@DemPilafian 8 місяців тому
QPU uses a different work paradigm... it's known as WFH.
@fuzzy-02
@fuzzy-02 8 місяців тому
Rick and Morty, processing unit dimension?
@wheredhego47
@wheredhego47 8 місяців тому
Just thought about Neil Gaiman's The Sandman for some reason.
@orbik_fin
@orbik_fin 8 місяців тому
You didn't mention DSP - digital signal processor. Specialized to run a single program continuously in a loop {input -> process -> output} with a strict time limit dictated by the sampling rate. Used extensively for stuff like audio, radio comm and oscilloscopes.
@PrathamInCloud
@PrathamInCloud 23 дні тому
Yes because it's not used by a general purpose computer, even though technically it is still computing stuff
@abhinavnatarajan4180
@abhinavnatarajan4180 17 днів тому
​@@PrathamInCloudnot necessarily true, most general purpose computers have onboard audio chips that are doing A/D and D/A conversions, and that might involve some DSP. Lots of modern phones have dedicated DSP modules attached to their cameras and for dealing with microphone audio.
@yehitecharts
@yehitecharts 8 місяців тому
BRO! 6:16 was the MOST comprehensive visualization of matrix multiplication I've seen and I've watched several videos and tried reading several books because I've been self-studying and I came to the conclusion that I need a tutor or something but wow bravo. That actually made me excited to learn it! If you're not doing math videos can you point me in the right direction? Thank you and God bless!
@huverdoose
@huverdoose 16 днів тому
Still no replies. That sucks. I like 3Blue1Brown's channel. He assumes you've gotten to Trig at least before you start with his earliest videos.
@HeisenbergFam
@HeisenbergFam 8 місяців тому
"highly trained wizards called software engineers" gotta be one of the most accurate sentences said in history
@universaltoons
@universaltoons 8 місяців тому
W
@Namrec_Molai
@Namrec_Molai 8 місяців тому
This man spitted forbidden facts
@LuisSierra42
@LuisSierra42 8 місяців тому
I'm a wizard Harry
@rg2130
@rg2130 8 місяців тому
@@LuisSierra42 I'm a Jizzard Harry
@freddiem7993
@freddiem7993 8 місяців тому
Hello again heisenberg! For those who don't know, Heisenberg is the fresh account of the "NMRIH is a great source mod" which was banned for botting/violating UKposts TOS -Same mannerisms, Over 800+ subs to only popular/viewed channels, popped up right when the previous account was banned about four months ago, this account is a bot that spams and like baits channel's comment sections for subs.
@HerrMustermann
@HerrMustermann 8 місяців тому
CPU: We need to talk. GPU: Already calculated what you're about to say. TPU: Already completed your words with predictions. DPU: Already sent the message. QPU: I was on the next conversation.
@relix3267
@relix3267 8 місяців тому
All that while the human is watching onlyfans😂
@rem7412
@rem7412 8 місяців тому
I like this
@Pandazaar
@Pandazaar 8 місяців тому
brother is just spamming chatgpt comments
@rem7412
@rem7412 8 місяців тому
@@Pandazaar smh it's still funny
@dontblamepeopleblamethegov559
@dontblamepeopleblamethegov559 8 місяців тому
QPU: I own your bitcoins now
@Popipo85
@Popipo85 8 місяців тому
Are we all gonna ignore the guy playing League of Legends with a controller at 5:01? 💀
@BadDuDeShot
@BadDuDeShot 8 місяців тому
Was search if one noticed it 💀
@EtaCarinaPhenixsChannel
@EtaCarinaPhenixsChannel 4 місяці тому
I was thinking the same thing XD
@HunterKiotori
@HunterKiotori 3 місяці тому
The superior way to play games
@lunyxappocalypse7071
@lunyxappocalypse7071 Місяць тому
​@@HunterKiotoriIt's best to play with whatever you grew up with, in my opinion. The brain remembers. My cousin still treats his computers keyboard like a controller, while I'm still wrapping my head around LT&RTs, and how to switch between two buttons simultaneously. It's a similar problem when switching musical instruments from, say a Guitar or Violin to a Keyboard.
@finadoggie
@finadoggie 8 місяців тому
6:50 somehow, touhou manages to appear everywhere
@SubPriestPepsi
@SubPriestPepsi 8 місяців тому
Submit to the cult.
@mikedub
@mikedub 8 місяців тому
This is how history should be taught.
@brain5853
@brain5853 8 місяців тому
With Amouranth gifs hidden within the material? Agreed.
@Namrec_Molai
@Namrec_Molai 8 місяців тому
I think he read Oghma infinium
@LuisSierra42
@LuisSierra42 8 місяців тому
@@brain5853 🥵🥵🥵
@josue1996jc
@josue1996jc 8 місяців тому
you know . . . i've been having this conversation with my friends (who are algo pretty well educated i must say), and we all agree that the field of philosofy whom ussually were the ones given the task to analyze the facts studied by science and kinda digest it and present it to the regular foe in an understandable way has been less and less capable of doing this job and have been more and more disconected than ever (science and philosophy should be more interconected now than ever) sadly because the factual data presented by science, is becoming more and more complicated by the introduction of . . . well the "quamtum everthing" as we call it xd, so what happen when not even the philosophers can't understand what the fuck i going on the physics department, and to be fair, i dont blame them. we din't really get to answer at the end but i think this channel has something about that migth help with the current situation.
@MarkelMathurin
@MarkelMathurin 2 місяці тому
But when you really think about it, the air does have a taste​@@josue1996jc
@markzuckerbread1865
@markzuckerbread1865 8 місяців тому
An analogy I really liked for comparing cpu to gpu is trains vs cars, cars (cpu) are really fast for transporting one person as fast as possible, while trains (gpu) are faster than cars when transporting thousands of people as fast as possible, a cpu has really low latency for executing one instruction while gpus abuse simd operations to reduce the average latency over many parallel and similar instructions.
@attepatte8485
@attepatte8485 8 місяців тому
Thanks Zuc.
@headhunterz1000
@headhunterz1000 8 місяців тому
Yeah so which one is the car?
@HappyBeezerStudios
@HappyBeezerStudios 3 місяці тому
Don't forget that the train can only transport people and only transport them all to the same station while the car can transport all kinds of stuff and load on and off at any point.
@leoaso6984
@leoaso6984 8 місяців тому
3:03 Just to expand on this, CPUs don't strictly *need* multiple cores to run programs at the same time. What really allows this to happen is context switching and I/O. Iff you record the states of all of the registers and memory of a program (i.e. the program context), and then restore the registers and memory to those states at a later time, the program will continue running like no time passed. Operating systems use this nifty feature to constantly switch out the currently running program, and they do this so many times per second that the user feels like the programs are rhunning smoothly in parallel. And they switch contexts either when a certain number of milliseconds passes, or when the current program thread does some I/O, since a thread waiting for I/O to complete does not need the CPU.
@Max_G4
@Max_G4 8 місяців тому
Well, that is quasi-parallel computing. For actual parallel computing, you do need multiple processors
@ohalee-nkwochachijioke7624
@ohalee-nkwochachijioke7624 8 місяців тому
​@@Max_G4Exactly 👌
@PixyEm
@PixyEm 8 місяців тому
One downside of a QPU is that you need to stay aligned, you don't wanna know what happens when you're QPU misaligned
@jp46614
@jp46614 8 місяців тому
It's important to clarify on most architectures (especially CISC) one clock cycle usually isn't one instruction, only some very fast instructions can execute in one clock cycle but reading memory or division/multiplication can take several clock cycles.
@crazybeatrice4555
@crazybeatrice4555 8 місяців тому
Well there's also instructions per clock as well
@Luredreier
@Luredreier 8 місяців тому
Most of the common instructions actually finishes in one clock cycle these days, AMD and Intel have both worked really hard on that to reduce latency. But you're right, some instructions might take multiple clock cycles. On the other hand a core have multiple pipelines and can run multiple instructions simultaneously, filling pipelines with out of order execution, speculative execution and a second thread to ensure that execution resources are used even if one threads code doesn't use that resource in that moment.
@MI08SK
@MI08SK 8 місяців тому
Some instructions can be executed paralely in 1 cycle if they are not depependend, for example if there are 4 sequential addittions to 4 registers the cpu will execute all of them in one clock cycle because most Cisc CPUs have multiple ALUs so they can execute those operations simultanosly
@MI08SK
@MI08SK 8 місяців тому
Reading memory can take 1 clock cycle if it is in L1 cache
@trevoro.9731
@trevoro.9731 8 місяців тому
@@MI08SK Really ? Name the CPU which has a L1 latency of 1 cycle.
@noramwahmwah
@noramwahmwah 8 місяців тому
QPU stands for Quadruple Parallel Universes
@xbeatghost.6118
@xbeatghost.6118 8 місяців тому
What's that 🧐?
@ablobofgarbage
@ablobofgarbage 8 місяців тому
Ah, an individual of culture i see
@oguzhan.yilmaz
@oguzhan.yilmaz 8 місяців тому
Nvidia's official blog is saying QPU stands for Quantum processing units
@noramwahmwah
@noramwahmwah 8 місяців тому
@@ablobofgarbage Glad to see im not the only one (^∪^)
@akar_excel
@akar_excel 8 місяців тому
Bro
@wiredWhiz27
@wiredWhiz27 8 місяців тому
Its fascinating how graphics cards have come along Initially for graphics rendering Then crypto Now Deep learning neural networks and Ai Wow i wonder what they'll do next
@TrippSaaS
@TrippSaaS 8 місяців тому
Blown away by how good this content is. Thanks!
@DrakiniteOfficial
@DrakiniteOfficial 8 місяців тому
Correction: 1 Hz does not mean 1 instruction per second. Many types of instructions, like multiply/divide and memory operations, take multiple clock cycles to finish. 1 Hz just mean its clock runs once per second. Edit: I'm not completely sure about this second one, but I think Neumann in von Neumann is pronounced NOY-min, not NEW-min.
@asdfssdfghgdfy5940
@asdfssdfghgdfy5940 8 місяців тому
That’s a tricky one as he is from Hungary and I’m not sure how they would pronounce it. But in German it is NOY-mann. But Americans tend to pronounce it NEW-mann and he lived there for a fair while so he was probably called that when he was there.
@someliker
@someliker 8 місяців тому
NOY-mann The "a" is pronounced the same as in "Aha!". Short "a", long "n".
@armyant7
@armyant7 8 місяців тому
Just need to remember how "Freud" is pronounced 😉 This applies to "Euler" too...but not "Euclid" ☠️ (presumably due to cultural origin)
@asdfssdfghgdfy5940
@asdfssdfghgdfy5940 8 місяців тому
@@armyant7 Freud is easy. Try pronouncing Nietzsche
@DrakiniteOfficial
@DrakiniteOfficial 8 місяців тому
​@@asdfssdfghgdfy5940My guess is "NEE-etch". Am I close?
@AR-yr5ov
@AR-yr5ov 8 місяців тому
OMG you're the best at explaining tech topics in a digestible, memeable format
@sebby007
@sebby007 8 місяців тому
Your videos are epic! The information and humour density are perfect!
@ThantiK
@ThantiK 8 місяців тому
TPU is a brand-specific chip, made by Google for Tensor Flow. TPU is not a standardized term, but instead AI Accelerator would be used instead.
@PhillipAmthor
@PhillipAmthor 8 місяців тому
1:26 this is the ideal computing output, you may not like it but this is how peak performance looks like
@TriNguyen-xi8ji
@TriNguyen-xi8ji 8 місяців тому
Any one have the source? for research purpose of course.
@KatyaAbc575
@KatyaAbc575 8 місяців тому
@@TriNguyen-xi8ji Amouranth, my dude.
@ColePanike
@ColePanike 8 місяців тому
Lol. I was looking for this. It seems the replay frequency is disabled, but I'd be willing to get that bit would have a nice spike 😏
@Triangle1234
@Triangle1234 Місяць тому
lmao
@Vifnis
@Vifnis Місяць тому
Ah yes, the *binary logic gates-to-boobpic.jpg* pipeline
@qdaniele97
@qdaniele97 8 місяців тому
ALUs (arithmetic logic units) and FPUs (floating point units) also used to be a thing but now days are almost always part of the CPU (and are plenty powerfull so there is no need to add external ones).
@robertobokarev439
@robertobokarev439 8 місяців тому
FPU is replaced by AVX, there's even a separate instruction for floats summary and subtraction executing in just 2 cycles. The only case FPU is useful in is OS development (that shit with debug registers and stuff)
@cambrown5777
@cambrown5777 8 місяців тому
@@robertobokarev439AVX is just the contrived name of the ISA extension on x86 that allows vectorization/SIMD ops . FPU is the name of the module within the microarchitecture. These are totally different things.
@TomNook.
@TomNook. 8 місяців тому
Yeah I remember you could buy a FPU for the Amiga to accelerate it somewhat
@acompletelyawesomenameyay2587
@acompletelyawesomenameyay2587 2 місяці тому
PPU (Physics Processing Unit)
@Hansanca
@Hansanca 8 місяців тому
This was the best video you’ve made yet. Keep it up!
@elliotkopitske6222
@elliotkopitske6222 8 місяців тому
This is the most comprehencive CPU vs GPU vs TPU vs DPU vs QPU guide I have ever seen
@jaysistar2711
@jaysistar2711 8 місяців тому
RISC-V can, like ARM, be used for both high performance and low power consumption.
@jacob2808
@jacob2808 8 місяців тому
But is much much less mature than ARM
@breakfast7595
@breakfast7595 8 місяців тому
​@@jacob2808Yes it's not as mature, but I personally see RISC-V is the way to go because of the long term viability, and the open nature being better for compatibility and usability
@jacob2808
@jacob2808 8 місяців тому
@breakfast7595 i respectfully disagree but won't write up a thesis at this hour lol
@pixiedev
@pixiedev 8 місяців тому
I liked the outout 😅 1:27
@zanes9898
@zanes9898 6 місяців тому
Wow! This is by far the best layman video I've ever experienced on CPU variants. Keep doing these whoever you are.
@seneral9804
@seneral9804 8 місяців тому
And here I thought QPU stood for Quad Processing Unit Yes, that's a thing, usually a GPU-like parallel processor. Raspberry Pis mentioned in the video have one as part of their VideoCore "GPU". E.g. VideoCore IV has 12 cores, each processes 4 vectors per instruction cycle, with each vector being 4x32bit - so a 16-way 32bit processor. Used for the OpenGL implementation, but can also be programmed manually, if you dare (assembly or some higher level languages though with lesser support). It actually has decent branching support for a GPU, as you can mask away results for each vector element, and can branch completely if all your vector elements are fine with that branch.
@samuelgunter
@samuelgunter 8 місяців тому
they call me a YVPU -- youtube video processing unit -- because of my crippling addiction to watching youtube videos
@vishalmakwana8391
@vishalmakwana8391 8 місяців тому
The highly trained wizards, called software engineers 😂
@LuisSierra42
@LuisSierra42 8 місяців тому
Avada Angular js!!
@darkwoodmovies
@darkwoodmovies 8 місяців тому
@@LuisSierra42 What dark magic is this!? Expecto Reactus!
@PowerK1
@PowerK1 8 місяців тому
@@darkwoodmoviessmd fr fr
@mummyjohn
@mummyjohn 22 дні тому
King, Warrior, Magician, Lover; we are definitely in the age of the magician right now
@AndersHass
@AndersHass 8 місяців тому
Modern x86 processors does run fairly similarly to RISC type of processor but it still does have a lot more instructions in case they are still being used (to not break compatibility). RISC V will also be an interesting instruction set architecture but it is mainly just in microcontrollers and Raspberry pie type devices and not for personal and data center usage yet. There are a lot of special processors made like for taking pictures/video on phones and encoder/decorder. I would think with the rise of various machine learning models more processors will be made to optimize for them (or use FPGAs).
@Dicska
@Dicska 8 місяців тому
I think it's important to note that GPUs are much better at floating point operations which are essential to calculate co-ordinates for 3D rendering while CPUs are mainly good at integer operations - that's one of the reasons they co-exist and can't replace each other. I know the video explained some of it, but I'm surprised it didn't touch on the float-integer subject. Also, how did nobody point out the literal madlad playing League of Legends with a gamepad at 5:01, lol?
@rift1067
@rift1067 8 місяців тому
This. I was thinking the same in both cases. xD
@luke5100
@luke5100 8 місяців тому
Who else is old enough to remember math coprocessors? My first computer as a kid was a 486SX in the mid 90s and I remember reading in the manual that an optional math coprocessor could be installed. I always wondered how much faster that would have made my machine
@NNokia-jz6jb
@NNokia-jz6jb 8 місяців тому
286 had them also.
@jbird4478
@jbird4478 8 місяців тому
We still have those, but they're nowadays integrated into the CPU. In fact, they already were at the time. If you upgraded a 486SX to one with math coprocessor, you were actually given a full CPU with integrated coprocessor, and the 486SX would retire, remaining a useless artifact on your motherboard. As to how much faster that made it... depends on what you were doing. For most things, not any faster at all. For CAD, a lot.
@luke5100
@luke5100 8 місяців тому
@@jbird4478 interesting. So as always there was probably a degree of marketing hype behind it. Haha. My understanding was SX meant no math coprocessor and DX meant it had one. Not sure if that was actually how it worked. Back then we were still a couple years away from all the information we now have access to on the web so you learned about things through your friends, through manuals or through computer magazines
@jbird4478
@jbird4478 8 місяців тому
​@@luke5100 That's what it meant. But there was no external math coprocessor for the 486, so the optional math coprocessor they sold was internally a full 486 DX with the FPU integrated, but rebranded and with different pins. Yes, that's marketing. Anyone who at the time would have needed an FPU would have known so, and would have bought a DX to begin with. Most general purpose software (especially back then) doesn't use the FPU at all, or hardly, so does not benefit from it. WordPerfect and Minesweeper would have run exactly the same with it :)
@warlockpaladin2261
@warlockpaladin2261 8 місяців тому
The SX was basically marketed as a cheaper chip than the DX simply because it wasn't built with the extra math capabilities, and unless you were doing something special, the odds were that SX was just fine even if slower on mathematic processes. Anyway, I had a 486DX back in 1992 (when it had just come out), but they were already obsolete and on the second-hand market by the mid-90's because of the Pentium (basically, 586). Oddly enough, the earliest Pentium chip I've ever personally owned or encountered was the Pentium II, so I've never had to deal with "the division error".
@andreastheone1
@andreastheone1 8 місяців тому
Awesome video! Thank you so much for all the good and accurate facts that i sure will use in the next months :D
@user-jd3gf5xw1x
@user-jd3gf5xw1x 8 місяців тому
that short animation just taught me how multiplying matrixes works
@vasilis23456
@vasilis23456 7 місяців тому
You could also go over older deprecated units. The FPU (floating point unit) which is now included in most CPUs, the short lived physics cards which now have merged with graphics cards and the long lived sound cards, when CPUs were not powerful enough to do sound and other functions at the same time. As you can see most of these units died due to COUs becoming more powerful and taking over their jobs. That is because there is a fairly hard barrier for performance needed for things like sound unlike graphics where the quality rose with performance of these cards.
@dylsplazy
@dylsplazy 8 місяців тому
You forgot the PPU (Picture Processing Unit) The old 80s 8 bit proto gpu. You'd typically find one on retro games consoles
@warlockpaladin2261
@warlockpaladin2261 8 місяців тому
These were responsible mainly for converting video memory data directly into analog-ready signals. In that sense, a PPU was technically more of a DAC than a GPU. On that topic, a GPU is really only a PPU if it has an analog video output of some kind.
@luke5100
@luke5100 8 місяців тому
3:04 Jeff made it sound like multicore processors are necessary to run more than one application at once. I don’t think he meant for it to come out that way, but just to clarify for anyone who is still new to this stuff… Multitasking has been possible for decades through a process called time slicing, where even on a single core, the CPU can do bits of work For multiple processes, effectively simulating things happening simultaneously even though things are still happening sequentially. It’s like if you are preparing a meal and you have multiple things on the stovetop at once, you check on one of them, bounce over to the next one and go between them until the meal is ready
@arjundureja
@arjundureja 8 місяців тому
Yeah it's called context switching.
@tg3470
@tg3470 8 місяців тому
Protect this man at all costs! Thank you for this explanation
@stachowi
@stachowi 8 місяців тому
Love everything aspect of this video, you have a gift
@jonas8708
@jonas8708 8 місяців тому
Even modern x86 CPUs use RISC under the hood. In stead they simulate x86 instructions with a hardware compatibility layer because the x86 instructions set has become so ridiculously complicated that implementing it directly into the base layer silicon was becoming a serious problem both for performance and circuit complexity.
@Jake-mp7ex
@Jake-mp7ex 8 місяців тому
The reason you can do multiple things at once isn't because of multiple cores, we could do it back with only a single cpu. Your CPU does a tiny bit of computation at a time for multiple processes, and switches between them rapidly. Think of it like a chef cooking 20 meals at once. The reason this isn't noticeable is largely due to the vastly slower I/O commands it has to wait for. You can think of this as frying. You can think of the CPU as cracking the egg, plating up, etc.
@rankarat
@rankarat 8 місяців тому
Single core gives an illusion of parallelism. Multiple cores actually work in parallel.
@softbubble_
@softbubble_ 8 місяців тому
@@rankarat is hyperthreading an illusion or actual parallelism?
@stepansigut1949
@stepansigut1949 8 місяців тому
⁠@@rankarat Do they though? They might share a memory controller which needs to fetch the data sequentially. Parallelism depends just on the expected latency of the output and can be achieved via interleaving.
@dominicdurkacs8321
@dominicdurkacs8321 8 місяців тому
A single cpu core doing multiple things at once is like you doing homework and eating food at the same time, you alternate. A multi-core cpu doing g multiple things at once is like you doing homework and listening to music at the same time.
@myhandle__
@myhandle__ 8 місяців тому
This intro was so simple , fun and creative explanation of what is a computer
@georgeakonjom6015
@georgeakonjom6015 8 місяців тому
The videos just keep getting better!
@destroyer2973
@destroyer2973 8 місяців тому
Inside the Broadcom Videocore GPU there are 4 slices. Each slice contains a quad processing unit. Which is a quad threaded CPU risc CPU core with additional instructions for graphics operations. It runs a proprietary firmware based on Microsoft threads and is also responsible for the boot sequence on the raspberry pi.
@sel4785
@sel4785 7 місяців тому
What in the goddamn fuck are they cooking over there
@minneelyyyy8923
@minneelyyyy8923 8 місяців тому
the TPU is called the template processing unit. it is a chip specifically designed to speed up the compile times of c++ programs.
@JATmatic
@JATmatic 8 місяців тому
Ah, the case of running an compiler on the template meta programming instruction set TMPI. Letting the compiler compile time compiler that runs on compile time.
@sciencecompliance235
@sciencecompliance235 8 місяців тому
It's my understanding that the T in TPU stands for tensor. Like a matrix but with n dimensions.
@uprobo4670
@uprobo4670 8 місяців тому
MAN ... i so rarely comment on things but your first 40 seconds were pure art in many forms ...
@AdrianoRodrigues
@AdrianoRodrigues 8 місяців тому
Man, i gotta say, i really like your way of explaining such complex subject with such a humor! The memes are hilarious
@peterlach681
@peterlach681 8 місяців тому
thank you, this video is fire!
@yugshende3
@yugshende3 8 місяців тому
That cpu outputting amouranth was the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.
@monstag616
@monstag616 7 місяців тому
Your videos are really informative , funny 😂😂 and short. Loved it.❤
@ayushs_2k4
@ayushs_2k4 2 місяці тому
That last "Trust me bro, it doesn't work" 🤣😂
@honkhonk8009
@honkhonk8009 8 місяців тому
4:47 Thats from an Nvidia graphic showing their older Pascal architecture on the left vs their newer Turing architecture on the right when it comes to matrix math
@AjayGautam-ik2dm
@AjayGautam-ik2dm 8 місяців тому
Pure Awesomeness. Thanks for posting this 😊
@Jerry.Luna63
@Jerry.Luna63 8 місяців тому
Another banger explainer video! Thank you 🙏
@b4ttlemast0r
@b4ttlemast0r 8 місяців тому
Modern GPUs actually have tensor cores included in them, so they're basically a GPU and TPU combined
@computerblade
@computerblade Місяць тому
Now there's NPU....
@weybansky
@weybansky 8 місяців тому
I just love the writing and explanations 💓
@lakshyabankey1429
@lakshyabankey1429 3 місяці тому
Bro this has to be the best opening out of any UKposts video I have ever seen
@MaeLSTRoM1997
@MaeLSTRoM1997 8 місяців тому
0:53 "built by Konrad Zuse in 1936 in his mom's basement" lol you're the best
@DJ-bo4pz
@DJ-bo4pz 8 місяців тому
1:26 I laughed so damnnn hard on this😂
@CarlJohnson-iv7sn
@CarlJohnson-iv7sn 8 місяців тому
I love how you make it sound in the beginning like it's some crazy task and all we do is write javascript.
@Umarbit
@Umarbit 8 місяців тому
Please make a full separate video on quantum computer. You are good in teaching complex concepts.
@M4rt1nX
@M4rt1nX 8 місяців тому
I think that I'm ready to get my degree after watching this video. My brain got literally overload with all that information at that pace.
@jarodmica
@jarodmica 8 місяців тому
It's time for us to get a degree in Wizardry 🤯
@LeonAlkoholik67
@LeonAlkoholik67 6 місяців тому
You forgot NPUs. They will be used in Windows in the near future if you happen to have one inside your PC case. Taskmanager will also be able to recognize it.
@eskayML
@eskayML 8 місяців тому
You're the best man, love it!!!
@magicmanchloe
@magicmanchloe Місяць тому
That intro is fantastic! You just got a new subscriber! 😂
@maxjohnson7623
@maxjohnson7623 8 місяців тому
Great video
@HerrMustermann
@HerrMustermann 8 місяців тому
CPU to GPU: "You're pretty graphic, huh?" GPU to TPU: "You tensor to be dramatic, don't you?" TPU to DPU: "Always data-centered huh?" DPU to QPU: "Quantum of nonsensical bragging!" QPU: "I've processed this joke in a parallel universe where it's actually funny!"
@HypnosisBear
@HypnosisBear 8 місяців тому
Lmfao now that's what I call a good comment! Made my day xd
@avrakadavra1552
@avrakadavra1552 8 місяців тому
AI-generated joke, good one
@talhashah
@talhashah 8 місяців тому
This channel is the best thing I have discovered on UKposts.
@srinivasraghavendran9114
@srinivasraghavendran9114 2 місяці тому
I watched this on 2x speed but could fully comprehend due to having background knowledge but also the fact that your explanation is soo good! In 4 mins I understood this whole thing, thank you soo much !!
@ElOroDelTigre
@ElOroDelTigre 8 місяців тому
It would be nice ti have that output video complete and downloadable, for research reasons.
@piotrmazgaj
@piotrmazgaj 8 місяців тому
You know... I'm something of a scientist myself... output name: Amouranth (Kaitlyn Siragusa) from Twitch
@taimunozhan
@taimunozhan 8 місяців тому
There is a common misconception that quantum computers will replace regular computers. If quantum computers ever become available to the general public (and assuming society doesn't collapse after our current forms of encryption get obliterated), then it is likely that we'd see QPUs working together with CPUs, in the same way CPUs and GPUs coexist - a QPU can do some tasks much faster (by using a different kind of algorithms that exploit quantum weirdness) but they would be much slower for other computations (using traditional algorithms like the ones CPUs and GPUs are optimized to run).
@cazmatism
@cazmatism 4 місяці тому
Well apparently quantum encryption exists although the present form would still get obliterated
@ianmacmoore-nk4vz
@ianmacmoore-nk4vz 8 місяців тому
I wasn’t expecting a review of computer hardware history, but I’m here for it.
@michaalinski2925
@michaalinski2925 8 місяців тому
Ottimo video. Continua a pubblicare altre cose del genere.
@mani-oz7sj
@mani-oz7sj 8 місяців тому
Hey can you please make a video about the difference between ARM and x86?
@K8LOYT
@K8LOYT 8 місяців тому
JNL XD
@oksowhat
@oksowhat 8 місяців тому
its just a design difference, like different design of houses
@Dominik-K
@Dominik-K 8 місяців тому
I've gotten myself a Google Edge TPU USB stick, Coral Edge, which is super useful for some niche use cases. The power/energy efficiency makes it possible to let that run on battery too, interesting stuff
@vinylSummer
@vinylSummer 8 місяців тому
i wish i could get one here in russia. the thing costs a shit ton of money and it's only available through shady retailers
@RoflcopterLamo
@RoflcopterLamo 8 місяців тому
@@vinylSummer Probs got hardware/firmware malware aswell
@esmenhamaire6398
@esmenhamaire6398 8 місяців тому
Fun fact - prior to parallel processing on multiple cores, only OS's that could handle time-slicing could run multiple programs at what, to us sloooooow humans looked like in parallel. The Amiga had such an operating system, and for a while was used by NASA to handle comms with satellites in preference to Windows boxen, because Windows at that time could literally only handle one program running at a time. On my A1200, I once had a word processor going, whilst OctaMED was playing some music, a little video cartoon (very low res by todays standards, mind!) was playing in another and a couple of other things that I can't recall what they were after all these years. That pushed my Amiga (an A1200 with a 68030 processor) to its' limits, and some of the processes would go a tad slow now and then, but OctaMED was chugging along quite nicely through it all. Sigh. I loved the Miggy, it was a joy to use. I so wish Commodore hadn't shot themselves in every limb before shooting themselves in the head!
@sauravbv
@sauravbv 8 місяців тому
Fireship videos are like gym for the brain, it feels good after watching it ❤
@macreator9497
@macreator9497 8 місяців тому
1:20 a cpu can do more than one instruction per 1hz it depends on transistor count
@warlockpaladin2261
@warlockpaladin2261 8 місяців тому
Not like that, it doesn't. 😅
@macreator9497
@macreator9497 8 місяців тому
@@warlockpaladin2261 google ipc
@KinoINFINITY
@KinoINFINITY 8 місяців тому
1:32 output 😂
@lakshmanshankar
@lakshmanshankar 8 місяців тому
This is a top quality material 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@MrMBSonic
@MrMBSonic 8 місяців тому
One of the best conclusions i've ever seen 👍
@mpusch88
@mpusch88 8 місяців тому
These videos are gold
@bladetoto94
@bladetoto94 8 місяців тому
6:05 Yes pls, I have a RTX 4080 and that is what I plan to do with it. Please provide me a video on how to train AI, ty. I'm not even fuckin' joking!
@arthurhakobyan7343
@arthurhakobyan7343 7 місяців тому
Man the thumbnail is Fire 😂 you are a Legend 👍🏼
@martinalexander757
@martinalexander757 8 місяців тому
Great vid, but I think you need one about FPGA's
@IvanRandomDude
@IvanRandomDude 8 місяців тому
All of that science and engineering so I can style a button with css.
@FatherOshai
@FatherOshai 6 місяців тому
This guy is just next level 😂 I love it ...im a new sub!
@troythompson2
@troythompson2 8 місяців тому
Jeff you’re the best teacher I’ve had this past decade
@tristanmisja
@tristanmisja 4 місяці тому
If you showed this video to someone 600 years ago they would start a new religion based off of it
@recongraves1269
@recongraves1269 Місяць тому
Lol no need we are doing that now with ai Bitcoin and agi🎉 that's what all this is 😂
@dexterboy1
@dexterboy1 8 місяців тому
One of the most interesting video ever!
@cringy7-year-old5
@cringy7-year-old5 8 місяців тому
pluralize
@Somebodyherefornow
@Somebodyherefornow 8 місяців тому
@@cringy7-year-old5ones of the most interesting video ever!
@RandomChannelChannelRandom
@RandomChannelChannelRandom 8 місяців тому
That whole intro sequence was great
@rohanrajput36940
@rohanrajput36940 4 місяці тому
Man the starting was insane 😂, video is very helpful❤
@ekisklip5310
@ekisklip5310 8 місяців тому
0:16 electrical? you mean electronic?
@ragingfirefrog
@ragingfirefrog 7 місяців тому
Electrical engineer is the correct term.
@maxverb
@maxverb 8 місяців тому
There are also FPGA's (Field Programmable Gate Arrays) which are old and fascinating.. You set the instruction pipeline on that card beforehand, and feed it data. The output is a stream.
How a CPU Works in 100 Seconds // Apple Silicon M1 vs Intel i9
12:44
10 weird algorithms
9:06
Fireship
Переглядів 1 млн
Этого От Него Никто Не Ожидал 😂
00:19
Глеб Рандалайнен
Переглядів 8 млн
когда одна дома // EVA mash
00:51
EVA mash
Переглядів 9 млн
How do Video Game Graphics Work?
21:00
Branch Education
Переглядів 2,9 млн
This is NOT a Graphics Card - ASUS AI Accelerator
15:24
Linus Tech Tips
Переглядів 1,9 млн
WHAT IS NPU | MOST ADVANCED AI COMPUTER PROCESSOR
4:07
NEURAL NERD
Переглядів 15 тис.
NVIDIA REFUSED To Send Us This - NVIDIA A100
23:46
Linus Tech Tips
Переглядів 9 млн
10 regrets of experienced programmers
8:16
Fireship
Переглядів 558 тис.
10 Math Concepts for Programmers
9:32
Fireship
Переглядів 1,7 млн
Why so many distros? The Weird History of Linux
8:23
Fireship
Переглядів 1,4 млн
100+ Docker Concepts you Need to Know
8:28
Fireship
Переглядів 722 тис.
Phone repairs are getting ridiculous - Here's why.
22:24
Mrwhosetheboss
Переглядів 2,4 млн
Я Создал Новый Айфон!
0:59
FLV
Переглядів 2,4 млн
Игровой ноутбук за 100тр в МВИДЕО
0:58
KOLBIN REVIEW
Переглядів 137 тис.
Google Pixel 8A Impressions: Just Get The 8!
7:23
Marques Brownlee
Переглядів 577 тис.
Subscribe for more!! #procreate #logoanimation #roblox
0:11
Animations by danny
Переглядів 3,9 млн