Smart to show NativeScript as the last stack you were showing

you can build your own virtuel CPU by following this channel ukposts.info/the/lQEB7Jq0LKZPWmzoKoe6bQ.html

Thank you for all that useful information. Although, I believe you should have talked more about the majorly reduced power consumption of the Apple M1. Saving energy and having your device(s) run at much lower temperatures is very important.

@@ShawnRitch you’re right, but there is only so much I can fit into a short video :)

did you test NodeJS on node 16 with ARM support or Node in Rosetta?

@@user-if1de8pt2j lol my bad 😂 by “100 seconds” I was referring to the series

Not very detailed, there is another short video on a youtube which shows on a very simple processor example how does things work. It's much more helpful

@@user-mb4xy2cz3t you’re very helpful not even pointing us in the right direction let alone giving us a link

@@user-if1de8pt2j well does the same person talk for 12mins?

@Chris you’re roasting me for being a student?

Yep. Misanthropes are wrong. Humanity largely rocks.

Vastly overrating the importance of ben franklin m8

Let this be a lesson that if you’re consistently working on yourself and getting better each day you too can one day become impressive with your talents and knowledge

It’s all exponential. At this point all knowledge is passed down and those people with the knowledge are paving the way for new innovation.

​@@BRBallin1some people are just born different

thx for that info - i just started to regret hammering company staff to finally get me a macbook m1/2 due to that old imac i5 compiling ~20x longer than my i7 notebook.

O

Thought the same thing, surprised this wasn't commented more. ARM being a simpler architecture is by far the main contributor to the massive increase in efficiency.

the m1 is just not only a arm chip which makes it special rather , it is very special on its own way. Like Sharing the GPU memory and CPU memory, they call it "Unified Memory", it supports Out Of order execution too, and stuff etc

@@mrmeseeks8790 thanks just watched it. Very good explanation - it's not quite as simple anymore is it? I wonder, though, if the CISC chips will ever get to the point where, like the M1, high performance can be achieved whilst still keeping power usage and heat really low. That seems to be the really big difference.

Yeah, like SoC's aren't a new concept it's extremely common, and they aren't the reason M1 is fast. I've personally come to hate SoCs to some degree. Removing modularity when you don't need to makes the whole thing useless sooner.

@@ChrisD__ We can only hope the good 'ol "gaming PC" market doesn't change. I think it'd be pretty hard to change, because it's mostly standardized pretty well. Sadly laptops are now completly like "mobile" devices and are super non-upgradeable

Yep, operation code

Good call!

opt code works fine too

I think RISC vs CISC should have been mentioned other than that this vid is really great

Most knowledgeable people will say CISC is more specialty instructions that take more clock cycles and RISC simpler instructions that make longer code, but this is not nearly as accurate as it used to be. The M1 is a great example if a RISC architecture that has many specialty components and commands that we would traditionally consider the domain of CISC architecture It’s still useful to mention the traditional differences between the two, but I think these differences are becoming less and less accurate as time passes.

@@gumbilicious1 true specially with how Intel actually works for years they have been using micro-op as there’s a layer that takes CISC complete instructions & breaking them down to smaller operations similar to RISC This means extra work = extra heat

he didnt say much about what ARM is did he? Did I miss it?

The last Intel MacBooks are also 9th gen intel. It's important to note from a "processing speed" perspective.

Gems are always hidden in comments.

thanks dude, really informative.

You are a genius

Whoa! Thanks so much!

How do you make a cpu?

@@JatPhenshllem ukposts.info/have/v-deo/qZ1na62ZeWt4zn0.html&ab_channel=DIYwithBen (How a CPU is made)

@@conradmbugua9098 Thanks

​@@JatPhenshllemFPGA + RISC-V

EXACTLY how I felt! I stopped right away.

Same here. The first part was great, the second felt not only off topic, but heavily biased towards Apple. Disappointing 🙁

i feel like these types of videos should be shown at the beginning. then, you'd have a good baseline idea of what you're learning for the next few months

@@EthanDyTioco colleges arent there to teach people they are there to rip you off

Everyone is a CS student

impressive details just researching on CPU mining and wonder why apple switched to M1 kill intel but Im still a PC geek even with apple certification APPLE is just prestige

Omg yes!!

Its basically the usual informative stuff at the beginning and then a 10 minute ad.

@@physikus7888what?

Thanks !

Did you _actually_ watch the video? And did you _actually_ take a course about this subject (how CPUs work) and know what they teach there?

@@DrorF yes smarty pants I took CS429 (Computer Organization and Architecture) as an elective during my bachelor's. Pretty boring.

@@vishal24000 he didnt teach u anything.. u just didnt learn anything in ur college....

I mean…he fully explained in the video

It is now more powerfull. This is only true when using tools that the M1 have on the hardware. If you try to use something that Apple do not care about: Like Webm vídeos, JXL images. AOL encoder, APIs that are not Vulkan then it will be slower.

Web tech stack isn't really concerned with speed all that much, because microservices is slower. You have to use network to call services rather than a simple function call in a monolith application.

@@VivekYadav-ds8oz that wont be slow if they r on the same network 🙄

@@zedmagdy says who?

Yes. Apple is here to make money. Surprise!!!!

so true

Lets goooo, Fireship recognized this!

U forgot to add Go

@@ibrahimshehuibrahim918 thanks, ill add it next time.

UE 6 in 100 Seconds, Interpreters in 100 seconds, Forensics in 100 seconds, malware analysis in 100 seconds.

Same :c

Alex is underrated.

@@shanegilbert6574 I couldn't agree more!

If you can wait for the M2's then you should wait, IMO

8 GB of RAM. You must not run Docker

Yup, nothing new if you already buy Apple products lol

@@phantasyphotography3813 Lol

Coc...capitalism on a chip? Sorry...made me chuckle.

Please make a video on this too

@@monke4319 Hehe. She knows how to count binary from age 7 or so (one hand, 0-15). Funny moment when it dawned on her, what this is actually good for :-) We also did tube-triods to explain RAM, and floppy disk tracks + sectors. Internet-age kids have problems to understand the concept of storage, and where it happens when. There is no more blinking stuff, you can actually touch. It was very interesting for me too, to draw battery symbols and to know which was plus, and direction of current etc - after all these years.

@@leoingson dayum negga she knows a lot

How does undervolting work regarding battery output?

​@@rb1471 I really couldn't tell you because most my experience undervolting has been on desktop. I don't know if you can undervolt a laptop from the BIOS. Might even be dangerous if you can, because the CPU's are already adjusted by the manufacturer like ASUS or dell to give you the best battery life or cooling.

Yeah, if M1 is faster because it is an SoC, then why does an Intel Atom SoC not run circles around an i7? This video is a load of crap designed to make Apple fans happy.

@@ralf391 I am also sceptical about the claim that M1 out perform i9.

@@porcorosso4330 it doesn’t, outside of either hyper specialized workloads like workloads that utilize machine learning ASIC on M1 or in performance per watt. While M1 is amazing in its own right, it can’t break how physics works. Lot of stuff that’s running faster on the M1 is because it’s specially coded to utilize fixed function asic or the JIT reconciler/emulation of Rosetta can sometimes skip a lot of steps which isn’t great for mission critical work if need an error free environment. But most Rosetta emulated apps run slower still. Also, Lot of apps don’t utilize fixed function asic on intel or AMD for some reason, been a issue for a long time and nothing magical just because see it happening on M1. People look at premier for the best example of how much faster M1 is vs intel, the reality is by default premier disables intel QSV optimizations on windows and on Mac it’s just not available for some..reason? Turn those QSV functions on in premier on windows and if you have a recent intel CPU the M1 isn’t that far ahead if at all. Another aspect is synthetic benchmarks, Comparing what they believe to be “raw” performance. In reality, most of these benchmarks are very small and can easily fit within the cache operations without much eviction of code to DRAM, and thus get a huge boost in performance. This is also why we are seeing in same benchmarks, a lot of zen based chips running rings at the top too.. none of this specifically invalidates the benchmark, but it’s not a true raw compute scenarios in my book. Take geek-bench for example, it can run each test with minimal code eviction. Cinebench R20-R23 is the same way, this is why memory speed plays less role in this “CPU benchmark” and can even go single channel on my platforms and score similar or higher on some platforms. This because each tile tries to work within the cache. The M1 has a fairly large chunk of cache that’s unified between cores, it also acts as a buffer to DRAM, allowing the M1 to hit the DRAM less often.

Thanks for the heart

@@RajvirSingh1313 One heart please

May work on laptop but not on regular PC, PC is like that for customizable feature that allow you to modify it as needed while laptop probably need the cooling system and power efficiency to be better.

The thing with SoC's is that since they're constrained by size they may actually be less efficient

M1 is built for Macbooks and not the buggy half baked windows machines. most modern non gaming windows laptops also wont allow customisations . And the fact that M1 is still miles ahead than the most powerful windows machines and also the fact that mac doesnt require a ton of ram shows how apple is extremely efficient when compared to windows

Arm cores are winning on power efficiency, on PC that not focused on that, nobody will use low power processors. You'd get better performance with amd APUs if you want is SoC integration. Also because ARM sells the design of the processor to foundries, it is possible to mix x86 processor with ARM, some already have it iirc

no thanks. I'd rather have the ability to upgrade my PC as and when i choose. dont want some company selling me overpriced shit that i cant upgrade and have to throw away in a few years

@samiebuka good to see you too!

Apparently

Yeah, if the fact that M1 is an SoC, was the reason it's so fast, then Atom and any Snapdragon would have been dominating the laptop and tablet space right now...

Agreed.

It's even funnier that the comparison is made on intel mac and m1 mac and not windows intel/amd + linux intel/amd + intel mac + m1 mac...

@@AntonySimkin which dev uses windows anyways

@@KimYoungUn69 most pc's run on win... Why not?

Isnt ARM64 variable length instructions?

It's on the list

@@Fireship You are awesome!! Thanks!

The Apple Silicon is a very very pipelined ARM chip with some extra accelerators added to it.

CUTTING EDE 13 year old design!