and the next Vice President. And, then President.

@@glennemeroff4922 yang will be the next president unless biden dies in office

@SGT. York that was unnecessary

Glen Nemeroff - it would be nice if Californians spent this much time holding her (our Senator) accountable for the mess this state is in. And it would also be nice if she spent this much energy actually delivering for our state!

Biden and Harris are corrupt

Me lol

Anybody who wants to see how she really is

Yep, that lady is crazy just like Joe "racist" Biden

@@alphaandomega7957 AND A DESCENDANT OF A SLAVE OWNER!!!!

Me

Clarence Thomas: We meet again Mr Biden 😂😂

Trump 🇺🇲 2020 the sequel

@@postal1468 You couldn't write a better script.

BROVO & that's Both in English & In GREEK !

I TOTALLY forgot until I did a little refresher tonight.. that Kamala was the one who produced that letter from the anonymous woman claiming to have been ‘gang-raped’ by Kavanugh and others in the backseat of a car, too! It was Kamala who turned the letter over to the Senate judiciary committee, hahaha! Then, she later wanted impeachment inquiries opened against him. Holy hell.. I hope her participation in that sham comes back to bite her. And while I think Kavanaugh is probably a very respectable man and judge.. he must despise that woman with a passion.

And yet questions were asked... and yet brett and the rest of the court validate president elect Bidens win. HES STILL YOUR PRESIDENT! Ahhhhhh it's so much fun to troll the conservatives

cringe

@WilshirecityBlues country's already ruined luv

@@NAVYVICK who said I'm conservative? Have fun in your binary world.

@@williamhad how dare you assume my gender lol Have fun watching the end of the GOP

Lol I wish they made an snl skit for this.

Lol I’m watching over again just to see it.

@ What?!

Ronyfcb Farfan umm it is all a script it was. SNL🤣 Scummy, nonces, liars ahh😭😭

A better description would be like rats or leeches

💖😎💖

I certainly could not answer that question if someone asked me.

Okay, but she asked yes/no questions about whether or not he had ever spoken to anyone at an entire law firm about a highly relevant case. I'm an epileptic with consequently HORRIBLE memory, and I could have easily answered questions of this nature. She is literally doing her job, and doing it well. It's so absurd that she could be viewed as the bad guy in this video at all. People are really grasping at straws to make her look bad. I hope that's a good sign for her political future.

Okay...the "coin toss" quotes are from No Country For Old Men. It's a book/movie reference. When you're asked (particularly in the movie) "what's the most you've ever lost on a coin toss," and ya can't answer the question, dude literally flips a coin, and lets the coin "decide" your fate (whether or not he's gonna kill you). The guy in the movie scene was a bumbling, scared lil idiot as well. So, this guy would most likely be royally screwed if she asked him the "coin toss" question, because he absolutely cannot give a simple "yes/no" answer. Great book and movie, by the way!

@@kelseyn7721 but I'm not critizicing her. It's just dialogue taken from No country for old men of a scene where a store owner struggles to answer Bardem's questions and feels uncomfortable. If you haven't, watch the movie because it's really cool. I see how my comment can be misinterpreted. Actually I think she did a good job. ...I struggled with epilepsy too, cheers

"Im glad your brought that up, im about to answer that question...(continues to not answer question and try stirring up a race issue) then continuously proves she is no person to be given power to.

Biden should pack the court especially as the Republicans keep stacking it.

@@trolljones4386 lol stacking it? Its basically 5-4

@@beaminup funny that the left changed the votes required for supreme court justice and now look at them. Also 4 years ago they were saying that the scotus seat should be filled and now they dont like it

Brace yourself. They’re going to win and they’re going to pack the court. Deal with it.

Neither of your statement are true here

I cannot stand Kamala...she us an embarrassment to all women!

💯💯💯Exactly. Put Kamala in a 5 minute interview and all she would do is laugh and deny to answer any question about anything, ever.

@@lynnecantrell8877 she does not embarrass me that’s for sure :)

@@lynnecantrell8877 so are you

The hardest part is being asked a question that makes sense.

Kamala is the woman for the job

She wasnt specific in any sort of way. How is he suppose to know who works for that law firm. She could of started stating names etc but no lol. The question from a logical point of view made no sense.

I thought fishing in the Bering sea for crabs was pretty tough but civil discourse is pretty rough I guess what with all the AC and water and comfy chairs

scribd It was a specific law firm. Had she given a specific name and that’s not who he spoke with, he would’ve said no. She left It open ended, purposely, to allow him to name who he spoke with. Obviously he’s spoken with people, if he hadn’t he would’ve blatantly said no.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 your not alone

You and I both. I'd even pay to watch it if I had to. It's going to be brutal for Pence and I'm gonna love every second of it.

Yea its going to be brutal, Kamala is going to come off as a mean prosecutor like and soft spoken Pence will look like the victim of a obviously spiteful unstable person. It will clearly benefit Pence a ton!

@@adriatic1585 Except, she'll be asking questions millions of Americans want asked. She'll be addressing issues that actually matter. Which again, is what Americans want. Right now, Americans don't give a shit about the mudslinging, name calling or conspiracy theories. We want our candidates to take this seriously. Some don't even know if they're gonna have a home in the next couple of weeks. People don't know where they're gonna find the money to feed their families or pay for funerals. We don't know how long quarantine is going to last or if a fascist regime of unknown agents are going to invade our cities. We have real friggen worries. Worries our current admin doesn't care about and has no plan to even pretend they do. So her line of questioning, her rebuttals, her talking points, will be aligned with not only what the majority of the country wants, but what the country really needs right now. So yea, Pence is gonna walk away like a battered servant, but in the end she's going to demonstrate who's really up to leading, and it sure the fuck isn't him.

Popcorn Party!

Ladies?? they must have redefined that word too

@@billjones424 no one gaf

@@cheezeit5353 ??

Yeah almost as crazy as nominating a sexual predator with questionable credentials to the Supreme Court

@benjianubis lmao. What does insulting him do to change his mind? I swear people think politics make up for intelligence.

@benjianubis my “nonsense” statement would mean you have to come to terms with the fact you’re not smart for holding a certain opinion, so of course you’re going to respond like that. Same way OP isn’t stupid for holding a certain opinion either. It is literally how you perceive the situation and yet you have the audacity to say some can perceive something wrong. Your line of thinking absolutely murders diversity of thought and makes intelligence partisan. “If YOu DOnT AgRee WiTh mE YoUrE StUPiD” nice one dude.

@Jacqueline McBride roasted.

@benjianubis i like how you think im lying to you when I said that someone holding a certain opinion has nothing to do with intelligence and everything to do with perception. Also. If you’re going to criticize grammar, is there a word, “thay” in the dictionary my man? Do you decide your opinions based on what “smart people” say? No, you base your opinions on your interpretations of scenarios in politics. That’s fine, but don’t criticize others for coming to a different conclusion than you. Rather, you should criticize the process they used to come to that conclusion.

@Jacqueline McBride appreciate it my man

Yeah exactly. So annoying and idiotic

Make it illegal actually. They wouldn’t let right wingers be this rude. We’d be locked up and starved to death. The hearing room is not a free speech zone.

Kamala was smirking because she knew they were going to yell out.

True but also the guy who interrupted Kamala, each person gets 5 minutes I believe and every second matters, they should turn off everyone else’s mic

That's because they are plants for the democratic party.

Exactly, she is brainless. And the guy was terrified of being caught lying. I actually don’t think he told anyone in that firm “on purpose ” , he might have told other people who could potentially be related to the firm and he dosnt know it, if thats the case and he answerd no then he would be lying , so i dont blame him for giving the answer he gave

@@sourstrawberry6636 I mean, unless he’s going around talking about the mueller investigation to anyone he meets on the street and never interacts with again, I’d find it hard to believe that he doesn’t know at least some information on whoever he’s discussing the investigation with, and given the context under which that conversation would reasonably occur, he’d probably know whether or not that person is affiliated with that particular firm.

He would have said no because the law firm was the center of the investigation. Why would he say yes? He is a judge he can’t anticipate the traps as well🤦🏽‍♀️

Adam K, It's not that simple. He would have said, "I don't know, I can't remember." The same runaround he's giving her now.

She incessantly insinuates Judge Kavanaugh is an idiot. Emasculating a man seems to be her forte'! Despicable behavior for a real lady.

Sen. Harris was attempting to trap Kav into saying "no", and then she would bring up a person associated with the firm (however minimally) that may have spoken to him. Then she would accuse him of lying. Sen, Lee saw this trap immediately, and that's why he objected into her time to alert the committee as to the trap question that it was. Good for Kav, bad for Harris.

This is when I was first introduced to the Old Bag......what an inept and failed attempt to trip up Kavanaugh.......she's awful.

She figured he was dumber than she was

And what is up with it's a yes or no? She's sickening.

@@mistybarr1761 I don't think you ever sat on a jury or listened to a cross examination if you think asking a simple yes or no question is "sickening"... fragile much?

Yeah, watch him pick his teeth and eat what he pulled out.

Who is that😂

A republican. We're all normal people, these democrats are fucking insane tho

@@Quesque_que yeah I've noticed republicans tend to be a lot more pragmatic. Speaking from a foreigner. The democrats seem to want all the authority of men, the privileges of women, and the accountability of children.

@@satoshinakamoto7253 Exactly. Couldn't have put it any better

😭😭😂😂😂

@Carlos Ochoa lol why? Do you defend that kind of questioning?

@Carlos Ochoa Left showing their true colors. Well done.

Carlos Ochoa don’t be mad, Karen.

Spicy - you missed the point - she knows about the conversation. She wants to see him squirm not to purgor himself 😉

Amazing 😂😂 this whole hearing is so ridiculous it’s almost surreal

I’m sure he was still laughing about the protester... nice try

Omg you right hahaha

If you watch long enough he eventually fishes a piece of food or something out of his mouth, then re-eats it. Gangsta.

littlecloudflower my favorite moment in this video !

Not true. This is implying that he’s had conversations with strangers about the investigation. If you’re speaking with someone, you most likely know who they are. Who discusses pressing current events with strangers? His demand for a list is just redirecting the conversation because he was too afraid to answer.

@@wisteria6599 A good judge cannot make suppositions. Your point is fair enough, but you assume that he knew for a certain fact that a person has worked at said lawfirm. A good judge cannot make assumptions, thus he made the fair point of asking for a list of names or a name so he can accurately answer the question without making said assumption

She was asking an impossible question to answer and then make it seem like he was hiding something. Just another beyond disgusting technique and has nothing tk do with truthseeking. It was all political. Kamala Harris is such a disgusting person. She's really pushed me toward the republican party.

She thought she did something. Brett moved on and she’s been exposed for other things

I think he answered it perfectly. This is not an interrogation. You want a specific answer? Give me a specific question. As in “did you ideal to Jon smith who works for this specific law firm about the mueller investigation?” Yes or no. “

well said

Wow, it's almost as if you speak english and Kamala speaks Japanese. You're brilliant

@@bregonwebb8921 no democrats speak stupid

Wrong! She trying to expose him for helping Donald trump by feeding his lawyers helpful info for his defense and promise to save his ass if impeachment is brought upon him in exchange for the nomination. It’s pay to play, favor for a favor. Brett is legit and trying to become a Supreme Court judge, he ain’t speaking to anybody on such high ranking matters unless he’s getting something out of it. Colleague or not. He played stupid to wiggle out of her angle of questioning, he is a lawyer after all, playing the plausible deniability card is light work to him.

@@benfordrobert45 he dodged her

What makes you say that ?!

😂😂😂😂

he’s in BS mode

Boy you must be dumb as shit. She didn't ask a single question that had any effect except making her look like a pure idiot. She is trying to force a lie or make it look like she has info that she clearly doesn't. When you comment shit like this all it does is publicly state " I am an idiot. I have no clue how anything works. I shouldn't be allowed to vote."

😂😭

😂😂😂😂 Exactly

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You sir just won the internet!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🤘

This guy has touted himself as a highly qualified lawyer, but during this exchange, he acted like a borderline idiot.

lol

Her own dad is ashamed of her. Says a lot!

It's a cross examination, this is what lawyers do every day, not everything is personal and emotional like you apparently make it out to be. It's just a job.

@@Mewstor151 congratulations on exposing your ignorance. Learn a little bit about what actually happened during these sessions before you embarrass yourself.

@@dereksbooks Why bother writing this if you aren't going to respond to what I said? I watched the entire hearing. It is a basic cross examination, no different than what you would see at a trial. They don't even have to run these confirmation hearings, they aren't in the constitution. They can ask whatever they want to in their 30 minutes. Try and find something wrong with this other than "it hurt my feelings!"

@stillstabbin1 lol. Says the dumbass who calls a complete stranger a "bigot" without knowing a single thing about her. Do you morons understand hypocrisy? Of course not. The rules don't apply to you, never have.

thank u

Ygor Nimoy hahaha

Half? 😂 more

We use objective evaluations in comparison towards reality. Social norms change, so "crazy" and measuring it can be difficult, which is why reality covers a broad spectrum. I can give an example if you need it.

@@WilsonsKennel i need. Can u pls specify

lmaoo i came here for the comments too

TheBelegur exactly. There need to be laws preventing politically motivated abuse of prosecutorial power. Bob Mueller is in effect a 4th branch of government without checks and balances. Who oversees the oversight?

Jacob Bumpass as an independent, it's really hard to give the democrats any objective consideration when they behave like petulant children. I feel forced to vote along party lines for the first time in my life just to protect the president from what is a very politically motivated assault on our nations single highest office.

I have a huge problem Kamala Harris continue to call migrants, immigrants. Immigrants are citizens of a country that migrated from another country. Kamala Harris and other are suggesting that the migrants that come from Mexico are any other country all already citizens of the United States before they get here. That really needs to be looked at why the liberals democrats and tv media keeps calling migrants, immigrants. Europe calls them migrants which is correct. Kamala Harris didn't win in California, the poles where rigged. That also needs to be looked at Kamala Harris win in California.

SuperCorrector1 how rich is it that republicans are complaining about democratic impediment? Have we all forgotten about mcconnell's impediments to obama's nomination which lasted for about 293 days? This record will never be broken by the democrats. you have no leg to stand on.

how is a draft dodger a hero? lol

ag soldier ... I cannot stand her period. She's a danger to this country also.

Nah, you Trump supporters just love talking down on Democrats calling them snowflakes but when you meet one that’s tough and makes one of you stammer and stutter like Brett you say they’re arrogant. That’s fucking rich.

Horror Pop Mania lmfao tf? Do you know how corrupt Harris is? I’m an independent, and harris is j another hillary. She contradicts herself all the time. Another Hillary. Hypocritical piece of shit

I guess they weren't heroes, they voted yes. Boohoo.

@@LegacyandFierce ill mop the floor with her. and you sunshine.

She’s been caught my pence and tulsi she really isn’t anything special

I mean he could just say no, it’s not about facts that what questions are for

It was a simple question!

it was a very direct question though, lol.

She’s a disgrace !!!! Quackafornia at its bestest !!😩

You mean the VP candida.... Oh....😏

Absolutely she is horrible!

Yep she killed this little wimp 😂

She merked this cheese dick bastard 😂

Yes, and I'm very impressed. Trump says she treated him horribly. Really? He's a lawyer and she's a lawyer. I'm sure he's questioned many witnesses similarly during his career. She was strong, kept her cool and her question was reasonable. He, on the other hand, came off as weak and definitely hedging over giving an answer.

@Toori Baba suicide ain't the way son

Because he's playing dumb, the only one to get it out of the bastard to hold a gun to his head.

@@garroshsucks12_ Kamala got owned, get over it

@@milostodorovic69 What? I don't even like her lol. She didn't get owned either he just refused to answer the question.

@@garroshsucks12_ this is a waste of time. He is innocent whether you like it or not

@@boncoeur7229 This was top notch and forthright questioning from Senator Harris

“I don’t remember” oh yea he really answered the question real well

@@gregpinta3021 your missing the end part where he in fact answers the question. Try watching the whole video not just a CNN sound bite. #themoreyouknow. If you lack the skills to find it I can send you a timestamp just ask ^_^

@@baccorame3058 Oh of course, because I have a different thought process to you i must just get breast-fed news from cnn. And yea, I watched the whole video. The best answer he gave was "I might have, but i don't know who works there." Thats such an obvious dodge but you refuse to see it because it doesn't fit your narrative. be better.

@@gregpinta3021 Kamala herself is unable to answer her impossible question, what makes you think kavanaugh is any different?

Brele will - That law firm has over 250+ workers. How is he going to remember all the dozens of conversations that went on during his time there??

He keeps a calendar

Well why wouldn't he just sau if he did it was not knowingly. That it may have been outside the firm and he wasn't aware they worked there.

@@TheCommandostudios He doesn't have to remember anyone specifically because she clearly asked "have you spoken to ANYONE, EVER, about the investigation " and he could say yes or no. If your comment was your attempt at covering for him you just did a piss poor job.

Exactly

And clarence thomas for Biden trying to stop his appointment. Karma is great.

Good look with that. 4 million votes up and counting ;) He likes beer though, apparently.

@@natasharenston3675 he likes Trump too.

Check mate!

have you no idea of what democracy is? what america has founded itself upon?

same here

Yes sure, and we've seen examples of his revenge since he got put on the SC, haven't we?

LOL yes!

She’s a liberal scumbag

Who's lying? Surely no Kavanaugh!

belle mcellis get out of the closet? That sounds mighty homophobic of you, my good man. Perhaps you are the scumbag and not jonny?

Jonny World m. Hey fcc

Those are the most childish questions. I seriously hope you're never a reporter.

A smh

m bk Lmaooo yess he don’t even know how to talk!

m bk 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣

Depends on what the definition of "is" is

Like Harris said it matters who he's talked too not whether he knows the person or not

@@Comicf_Breaks she's asking if he spoke with anyone who worked at the law firm. He should have answered, "Not that I know of" or "I'm not aware of speaking to anyone at that law firm about this matter." She could have said, "Did you speak with (name)," and he could have said, "Yes, but I was not aware that he/she worked for that law firm." It seems to me that she was trying to trap him and he was trying to avoid being trapped. Playing cat and mouse.

@@veronicamoore5560 so she was being a prosecutor

Veronica Moore. What kind of silly statement is that, you don't have to know someone at a law firm to speak to them about any subject matter.

@@hotbiz123 True, but Kavanaugh might have spoken about Mueller to someone from that law firm without knowing that the person he was speaking to _was_ from that law firm. So by answering "no", he would be unwittingly saying something untrue. That was the trap Kamala was trying to set, so that she could accuse him of lying. It's an old trick, but sometimes it still works. But Veronica is still on the wrong track. Kavanaugh might not have known _everyone_ who worked at that law firm, but he still could have spoken to someone about Mueller who he _did_ know worked at that law firm. .

Pulse Fox damn fine....red velvet lmao

*Pulse Fox* LMAO 😂😂😂

+Pulse Fox Haha and that's a much more relevant exchange than what Kamala was interested in.

Cheesecake

So you guys don’t like cake right?

The BrainWasher exactly!

There’s no fucking evidence

I was literally just thinking this

Because she's the "victim"

And boom goes the dynamite!

Who let the dogs _out_ ? .

😂😂😂😂 you right

But are we though?

SAY WHAT MOM

@@kitty-vk8ic WHO S RIGHT ABOUT WHAT

Inherently Singular: Because at least one person who is now at that firm, Edward McNally, worked in the Bush White House at the same time Kavanaugh worked there. If that is indeed the person that Harris is referring to, it's very unlikely that Kavanaugh didn't know when he spoke to him that McNally worked at the firm. I think what she is getting at is that Kavanaugh may have privately made disparaging remarks about Mueller and his investigation to McNally, who passed on this information to Kasowitz, who in turn informed Trump, which made the latter regard Kavanaugh favorably as a possible Supreme Court pick. Just speculating.

Why not just say to whom she was referring to?

Inherently Singular Stop being stupid. If he met someone who said where they work, during a. Introduction, he’d know if they were from the firm that represents trump. And pls don’t suggest he just talks to anyone and. Doesn’t know who they are, where they work.

Boy please he had to much hesitation he didn't know what to say he was caught you could see it in body language and no words please he lied right to the AMERICAN PEOPLE AND congress you want him as a judge please

@@deemack5142 it takes effort to reach ignorance of your level, the only thing worse is the people that agree with you lol.

It was close though: 07:23 "I don't know if the.... I don't know anyone" like he was gonna say "I don't know if the person I spoke with works there"

Anthony Richardson it’s not though 🥴

Anthony Richardson it’s called being ✨smart✨

Anthony Richardson she wouldn’t specify who she was referring to or who was in the law firm she referred to because she’s a ✨Snake✨ who put countless people in prison over marijuana and ✨laughed about it✨ she’s actually proven to be ✨awful✨ why would anybody talk to her?

Scamala is a fraud from way back. She'll be slithering back to her hole in the squalor of the heaping hellhole that is The Bay Area soon enough. On her knees I'm sure.

They did, he was confirmed

You’d put a clearly corrupt and unqualified man in office because some of the people who don’t want him there are annoying and unprofessional? That’s a really weird hill to die on, I gotta say

Chickens are coming home to roost-

I already have my popcorn 🍿 and my Pepsi 🥤.

She’s already destroyed!!! ukposts.info/have/v-deo/j5GTqpeZjqynmZ8.html LOL!!!

3 22 Only in your dreams!!! She’s doki 💩💩💩 All she does is acuse but she has no brains 🧠

3 22 THE ONLY THING SHES DOING NEW IS CHANGING BIDENS PAMPERS!!! SHES THE SAME WITCH ACUSER WITH NO RECORD OF DOING ANYTHING. She can’t debate when she’s done nothing 👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸👍🏽💪🏾🇺🇸

Not waiting for that Biden/Trump debate though... Lmao clowns

The only honest answer would have been "I don't know did I?"

use your head please, he is not a jedi to know who works at the law firm, is not a simple question is a stupid one, he cannot answer with certainty and she should know.

Ever testify in front of the senate on National TV? No? Then give the guy a break.

You did hear the question in the issues with that question... Right that everybody knows everybody have a law firm or associated with it. It could be the runner... Like it's coffee. Don't be stupid. She should just say the names. and let him lie or tell the truth a more trick question. Such a big question looking to to apply a lie. He might have talked to the garbage man that worked at the law firm. He was pretty clear. Tell me a name or names and I'll tell you if I talk to them.. Headed to her so she ate with that firm and then she has to your question.

Looks like youre not privy to how senate hearings work. Democrats are notorious for baiting traps to make the nominee APPEAR to be not telling the truth. Kavanaugh is extremely qualified for the Supteme Court. Read some of the hundreds of opinions he's written.

Nothing was hostile. Lol. It’s a simple yes or no answer. He was evading lol

@@TheSoulstar7 "Be sure about your answer, Sir" and "You have an impeccable memory, I'm surprised you're having such a hard time with this." You're right, no hostile tone in the line of questioning whatsoever. Furthermore, he did say he's not remembering any but that he can't be sure without knowing about which employee she is asking. Unless the conversation was with Mark Kasowitz himself lol

@@TheSoulstar7 you got it explained by others, people change position and there is hundreds of them, there is no way he could remember if he taled to employe of that law firm, he might remember person but not if that person was working in specific law firm. How is that not obvious

@@logand3957 You don’t see ANY reason at all why she wouldn’t give the name he talked to before he answers yes or no? No reason at all? I get that her lines of questioning were pretty snarky, but the phrasing of the question is standard procedure during a court of law

Total evasion. He is not a stupid person. He was trying to be coy and play her and he ended up looking suspicious. 🙄

You thought this comment was ground breaking Lmao

andrew rosa I guess it’s true: Every rose has its thorn...

I remember listening to a young Marshall Mathers, before he became Eminem, back in the day. Could it be possible that Kamala was listening to Tupac & Snoop years before White folks knew who they were?

She thinks dead rappers are still alive so...

Oh no she remembers Tupac and smoking weed to it and they weren’t even rapping at that time she too old lol

LOL! No perjury trap if you tell the truth. Which we know Donald Dump is incapable of.

@@dilbertdoe601 And looks who's still president, cleared on collusion and of obstruction suspicion/charges as well as Kavanaugh who still made it 😂. Hows that for good ol donald dump ?

Dilbert Doe: we both know trump is innocent of all charges and the dems can’t let it go cause if they do no one will vote for them cause a lot of people dislike them already.

​@@BRAXMANoftheS quick search, Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm has some 350 lawyers. Add paralegals and various support staff, gotta be a thousand or more. It is a perjury trap, even if you do tell the truth. A DC lawyer like Kavanaugh interacting with someone from that firm, and not even knowing the person is from that firm, what do you think are the odds of that, I'd say pretty good.

@@dilbertdoe601 wake up and grow a pair

I think she's very likeable and pretty damn smart. Don't tell people what they can or cannot do.

@@Marvelerence Have you heard her rallies? It’s silent. She insinuated the person she’s running WITH who got her to where she is a racist and sexual assaulter and when asked about it later she awkwardly laughed and said it was a debate insinuating you can just accuse people of terrible acts as long as it’s to get yourself elected. It’s not a secret she doesn’t have many democratic friends in the senate and just looking at her primary polls the democratic voters werent very fond of her either. So you may like her, but sadly you and a handful of other Americans aren’t enough to deem a candidate likable.

@@Marvelerence I guess you think that you are very likeable aswell. Lol

This man is a rapist and you’re worried about being liked? He’s making decisions on morality please sit down

@jamescliff8038

Fr 😂

@@geno9274 frfr

She was absolutely professional. He was the one who was too afraid to answer a simple question

She has that no nonsense I am not playing with you look in her eyes. He is afraid. This was the first time I really noticed her and I liked what I saw. If elected, she will not play with anyone=especially a Republican.

@@wisteria6599 that is why I like her so much.

He was just so smart, to play stupid. It was simple question, which shouldve been a simple answer. Yes or no.

There was no point...

You need to remember that liberals of fascist that suppress speech they don't agree with

she did try to bait him , but in the process exposed him as a liar he says he dosent believe that he spoke with anyone besides the judges so why would he need to know who worked there or not , if he is trying to imply he hasnt spoken to anyone besides the judges thats the equivalent of me asking "did you drank soda" , and you imply "yes but only at home" and then i ask did you drink soda at a restaurant and now you want to know the name of every restaurant in the city well if you didnt drink soda outside of your home what difference would it make ?? the same applies here if he didnt speak to anyone but judges who clearly dont work there , what difference would it make to know who works there ? he obviously spoke to someone about the case .... he just dosent know if they work there or not and he dosent want to dig his own grave.. he should have been consistent and said idk

he almost did til she was interrupted by the other committee member. she almost had him

your forgetting that lawyers become judges. so any of the judges he spoke with could have worked at the law firm, but what would have solved the whole thing was giving him a list of people to pick from. Dont understand why that is something that couldnt or shouldnt have been done if the system was trying to find out the truth. Rather than trying to publicize people and events in certain ways.

darryl brown the restaurant thing is different, he’s asking about the people who work there because he doesn’t know everyone in the firm. How hard is it to understand. If she asked for a name and not the firm he should be able to respond but since he doesn’t know everyone that works there he can’t tell you the truth because he doesn’t even know if it’s the truth. Come on you are trying to put something together that isn’t there.

Seff H he seriously won’t answer any questions directly

Are you dumb or stupid?

I agree, kamala harris is weird

@@zeynablastname294 that’s a question for Kama

@@oscarsantos2240 That's a question for the people that don't know whats going on in this video

True . . . . She's behaving as if she's arguing with her girlfriends.

They were trying to stop the hearings from moving forward due to thousands of withheld documents that would provide more information into Kavanaugh. They released 42k pages the night before his confirmation hearing so this evidence was never brought to light. This is where you see the real activists and freedom fighters, not the folks here on youtube 😔

@@thaliaberdz to be honest, this is the first that I have heard this, and I truly appreciate you for filling me in.

@@bigboi57 I appreciate you and your curiosity 😊 my pleasure!

@@thaliaberdz They were trying to stop the hearings because it was an immense waste of time to begin with. And it still ended up going nowhere, because there was nothing behind it.

@@dustinmyers5559 going nowhere? Trump's own campaign manager was convicted of conspiracy and tax fraud. He was wired 18M. There were at least 13 people indicted and found guilty! That's why his campaign is now bringing up Hunter Biden. They are just deflecting from what they've already done. Come on, you can't see that?

Imagine being falsely accused of sexual assault and being treated like this. Is there a more infuriating injustice?

That's how they laugh when people protest losing their healthcare too

@michael hines no ..that's not what I'm talking about. They wanna take it away from 30milion people with preexisting conditions. Born with conditions.

I think it’s Julian Castro.

No I think he was laughing at the reference of rabbits, given how they multiply and looked at his homie in afirmation

HE WAS LAUGHING AT THIS RABBITS COMMENT11!!1

jenny van stock it’s not a case, nor is it a case he’s hearing at the moment. It’s something that’s all in the media. Dumbass!!

No. It's not a case HE is on. So.....no. You should smack you head, might get your brain to restart.

Yeah it fucking DOES matter when her question is did you talk to anyone WHO WORKS AT THAT LAW FIRM.... if he doesnt know who works there he cant know if he talked to anyone of them... wow you guys are stupid rlly...

Jeffrey Lebowski wait so you saying we’re allowed to do anything as long as we don’t know we’re doing wrong?

No...? Maybe read it again, watch the video again, and turn ur brain on this time =) no offense... If i asked you if you had seen anyone today, who had joghurt for breakfast, would you be able to answer my question with yes or no? No... because you dont know everyone whos had joghurt or know what everyone has had that you've seen today...

He didn’t he also never answered the question, it’s a yes or no. Not hard. Anyone. She doesn’t ask who, she just asked if he talked to anyone. Anonymous. This is hella silly.

Idk I would think its not hard to remember if you spoke to someone from a law firm, even if you’re not sure who they were.

@@ggwurld 1. That is exactly what he said rewatch the video. 2. Freedom of speach means you dont have to say anything he answered the question the way he wanted to and that was very much allowed. She should've been more specific. He doesn't have to self incriminate

That's the point. She wasn't referring to a particular staff member at the Law firm. The Robert Mueller Investigation was front-page news just before she asked Kavanaugh that question. Logically, you'd think he would have remembered if he spoke to a well-known Law firm about it. Her question was fair.

@@jamesirwin8917 again logically if you were in his position you wouldn’t self incriminate either

Yes !

Bruh the question wasn’t like that stop lying

@@mike_404 right ! He knew exactly who she was talking about. That's why his mouth got dry REAL FAST 😂😂😂

@@DevTheDudeRN that’s right

The answer is yes, i have and i can tell you what we talked about too. Its not a hard question, took me less than a second to think about it

@@jovannybenitez209 the difficulty of this question is different between people. And certainly you don't know memory capabilities of anyone. You don't know if he had any kind of memory related disease. Answering yes or no question can be a lie either way when you didn't remember those events. Doesn't matter if it takes you a second to answer while others take hours or days.

@@afiq2814 This is such a bullshit response I dont even know where to start. Not only that but the way Seethi tries to characterize it is bullshit as well. If it were that simple he wouldnt seem so hesitant to answer it. He knew exactly what she meant and was trying to dodge it in a way that wouldnt implicate him by being a right out lie. And what scared him is that he didnt know how much she knew. In his official capacity he should be aware of the difference between what is common knowledge and whats privileged. In fact even janitors that work in health care settings are aware of HIPPA violations and that they arent allowed to discuss anything they might overhear of a patients personal medical history. Its not a matter of memory, its a matter of discretion. That alone should eliminate the vast majority of people he had any real discussion of matters with.

@@esportsweapon6907 That was a bullshit question to begin with.

@@esportsweapon6907 the way harris asked was bullshit as well. He said he didn't know anyone there then how the fuck he can confirm that he ever talk with anyone in that firm. You are just like typical person who are clearly not a psychological expert or mind expert or speech expert but you try to indicate a person wrongdoings. In a court hearing, those kind of question are meant to find inconsistencies in a story. Whether from defendant, victims or witnesses. But clearly nothing inconsistence could be found and harris horribly failed. Let me tell you one thing I learn from a psychology professor... If a defendant directly answer a question with confidence and with high volume, that's indicate he already prepared the answer before the question asked. If he stumbled, that's mean he doesn't know a damn thing about a question and. That's not 💯 correct but following steps will be determined by experts. Clearly harris is not an expert on psychology. He speaks with thousand of people, how can he be sure if he can answer that. Especially when harris are avoiding his questions too. "Who works there". Harris didn't answer. She didn't even fucking know. That question just to trap kavanaugh whether he answer yes or no. Another thing, you didn't know how much he remembers. Don't expect his memory is like a computer. I'm sure you are not a person who can understand people very well.

amzn.to/2QVAED2

Lots of cameras

no she is a horrible person

This fucking joke of a woman is our new VP. What a joke

@@taylorb7191 not yet. It will go to the SCOTUS and Brett will get his revenge

And she fcked her way to the top

She's not the one interviewing for a lifetime job onto the highest court in the USA.

There's a difference between not remembering something that happened 36 years ago and something that happened within the past two years.

@@laurenj6974 No, but her answers directly affect his (possible) appointment.

she didnt even remember if she financed her own polygraph or not and if she went to her grandmas funeral that day or not.

No, but she did accuse a man of sexual assault. Both situations deserve the similar amounts of fair aggressive investigation. edit: Let me be more clear.... I'm not talking about the specific differences of the nature of these situations. All I am trying to say is that this is not some kind of trolley dilemma. They allotted time specifically to question these people and/or those involved with whatever they are trying to figure out. They do not lose anything by making fair and valuable use of that time.

It is a trap question to accuse him of perjury

YOU KNOW VERY WELL WHO I MEAN

There are 1000s of people who work there

Russell H ....and doesn’t know a single soul, isn’t he weird?

@@ryanmeyer5355 he doesn't know if he's not talked to any of them

Lowkey entertaining lol

butthole parkinsons - It still makes it a shitty question lol

Gonzales98 if a LAPD cop comes and talks to you and later on that day someone asks if you talked to someone from LAPD, you really gonna say I don’t know his name so I can’t don’t know if 🤷🏼‍♂️ and truly believe you cant answer the question You’re not smart.

*lawfirm

@@andrewvital7623 Dumb analogy. It's more like, if a guy in a police uniform talks to you (in a city that happens to have multiple police units), and later someone asks you if you spoke to the LAPD, how can you answer with certainty? Think before commenting mate.

lmfaooo this logic is so flawed

Due ewe think sew?

I think some Dems will flip, like with Neil Gorsuch. Some are in red/moderate states and they need to seem more moderate. That being said, Kavanaugh will be confirmed.

He shouldn't be up there, Merrick Garland should have been having this hearing 2 years ago according to the constitution. The right wing in this country, are hypocrites, and the left wing are weak..

@@ronniedixon9919 Correction - both sides are hypocrites, and they're playing politics. Humor me for one moment. Imagine: It's 2016, and a republican president nominates a conservative to the court. Democrats are in the same position as republicans were. What do they do? Answer: the same fucking thing. Democrats are mad because they lost. They would have done the same damn thing.

+ronnie dixon Democrats started all of this nonsense by targeting and blocking reagan's nomination Robert Bork. And when they did that the republicans had to wait until Garland to get payback. None of the two sides are clean in this but democrats cannot just sit their and take the high horse on this since it was they who started it all.

Yes, but then all she would have to demonstrate is that he did know and lied about that.

Or just use the safe line “i don’t remember” and act dumb

Or... law firms have hundreds of people and it’s irresponsible to request that a person know every person in a firm.

@@samjosh9246 Do you believe he knew exactly who she was speaking of?

Glowgirl nope! I don’t think Kamala knew who she was speaking of otherwise should would have asked “have you talked with X about the muller investigation”. It’s a sleazy tactic to try to entrap him.

O-K

nobody did, she had nothing and was fishing blindly

100% correct - he was blubbering as if he didn’t know the law firm and looked like a child trying not to subject himself.

Judge: "Have you ever eaten a potato?" Kav: "Sorry, I don't know what a potato is" Judge: "Well i'm sure you can still answer the question."

Oak, more like, Kav: "Which specific potato are you referring to? I've eaten some potatoes, but I want you to provide me a list of all potatoes."

Cassie S. For real 😂

Bad example , it should be more like "have you ever eaten a potato that was grown at the haverson farm" Because it is possible that he ate a potato and has no clue where it came from. Just like it is more than possible that he could have spoken to someone and not known where they work or had worked in their past. I flew in an airplane and engaged in small talk with two other passengers. I have no clue what their job history is. You will notice no other democrat picked up this line of questioning. Nor did she "slam him" with having talked to some person that he wasn't supposed to. The question IMPLIES that it was somehow wrong for him to have spoken to a person from that company ( or case etc ) and people are getting hung up on it like it's actually an issue. Well , it isn't because he IS allowed to talk to those people anyway. He is not the judge sitting on the case.

Totally agree with you. And she looked so smug every time she asked it.

@ If someone is a liar why not call them out

@@snye5919 well he didn’t lie once... so....

@@collingilbertson2579 😂😂😂 you should do dark comedies

She's interrogating him. It's a legal tactic. Also, this man is an abuser and a liar, so firmness is necessary for this kind of questioning.