"Tachibana-san, why aren't we living?"

@@aureusknighstar2195 cause MURICA FRICK YA

**proceeds to make him blind**

@@leexcite2903 **by making him see the nuclear blast on the city**

@@aninditapaul9291 *and then stabbing him in the eyes just in case*

Underated comment

Far Cry 5

He has a moustache

Omg I didn’t understand this comment until like 10 seconds in. Then I fell over and died.

@@andrewdiaz3529 Joseph or John?

Stellaris players: hehe ethnic cleansing lmao

Nah my reaction to the game is plague inc. Don’t know why people are put off or disturbed by this game. It’s just a silly map game with funny little numbers popping up.

​@user-ez7ed7kd8e Same. I played Defcon, expecting to be scared or at least unnerved, but in truth I felt nothing. I had fun, it certainly wasn't boring, but I didn't feel any worse about it.

He seems to have been wrong, or we haven't reached that stage yet. I don't know which is worse

@@Deathstroke-gd6kd during the cold War russia and the US wanted to nuke each other very badly but they knew the world would end if either one did so, I believe we have hit that stage, we are still in it

@@Deathstroke-gd6kd pretty sure we have with the atomic bomb

@@pileofthoughts this is a possibility too much risk and less return while war give advantage to its victor nuclear war is totally didnt give advantage to its victor nor its victim its like "we won this war and now what?" and as to why is that all i can say that after war i bet theres no way to eat thing without dies due to nuclear mutation of things

@@TK-5311 ukposts.info/have/v-deo/aHuafX-WaaeSw58.html

OOF

Hol up

@@badmoth242xl3 [Last know post made on June 6th 1995 from a UKposts user that lived in a city along the Waldreich mountains]

That actually happened one time and I was scared running, tears in my eyes, busting down my parents door to there room... Luckily, I just moved to a different city that had a prison nearby, it was roll call

Aight imma head out

Yes... Readiness is always the joke... Because nobody is ready for the end of the world.

@@DTSephiroth deep

Because we don't want to say DEFRECON. That doesn't roll off the tongue as well

米空軍パイロット We all prefer to use DECEPTICON instead.

It should be *DREADCON* *D* efense *Read* iness *Con* dition

Play it on an off white CRT.. or like.. a projector screen

And HE knows that

ah f*ck I accidentally bought putin sim

@@coleisforrobot, aw hell nah bro💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

@@coleisforrobot 💀💀💀💀💀

This is what I was searching for. The fact that you can defend all you want, try to prevent casualties as much as possible, but in the end... it isn't a victory. Just a slightly lesser defeat.

@@commandertoastcz6256also shows how pathetically petty the retaliatory strike is, even though the enemy’s missile systems have been exhausted and their aircraft and fleets destroyed by your forces, you still end up launching an attack on the defenseless civilian centers for no other reason than “you had it coming”

It reminds me of Avengers Endgame. At the start of the movie, Thanos still won. They killed him, sure. But that didn’t solve anything. Everyone they knew still died. It’s hard to even call it a Pyrrhic Victory. Even Pyrrhus of Epirus would have been deadened and sick by that reality.

Why Gandhi?

@@JuozasMikulenas Because he nukes the shit out of everybody in Civ

@@JuozasMikulenas you wouldn't get it ;)

@@JuozasMikulenas You wouldn't get it *smokes*

Yeah i really don't get it :(

*HOL'UP*

I think you need to see a psychologist

Oh no-

That's Funn... wait... SON OF A-

You need to complete step 3 quickly if you did step two well enough

I guess there's only 5 days left till we get Nuclear Armageddon. Lmao

Underrated comment😂😂

Oh no

Well we ain’t f*ckin dead yet so...

There is no outside

Oh No ...

Life and how quickly we can die itself its humor

Don't be to terrified tho, the game lacks geopolitical interactions, therefor it is as from reality as Fallout 4 for example. What they miss completely is the fact that eradicating a whole country by irradiating it completely is not an option for a war, as you always try to gain land, resources, food stock, to gain in power on the way. After we saw the effects of radiation ont the japanese population, nuclear weapons got a mere tool of fear, nothing more. One has note, that i come to this conclusion, because i know that russia and america for example have nuclear weapon technology, that is virtually unstoppable, i am talking about missiles that travel at multiple times the speed of sound for days or even weeks, releasing radioactive material in the process.

Mandernach Luca that’s one thing I’ve noticed when people talk about nuclear Armageddon, they always leave out resources. Makes sense why the 2nd launcher would shoot, but the 1st launcher? What would they have to gain other than mutual destruction? And even if they could get away with “minimal “ damage, what then? You can’t conquer the area you nuked.not saying a nuclear war couldn’t happen but there’s a lot of questions I pose that no one cares to ask or answer other than, “cuz it’s inevitable”.well why is it? What could they gain?at the end of the day all countries want 2 things.1 self preservation 2 to conquer, dictate, or gain any sense of control for resources to benefit themselves.

Kaleb Pinkston if you lost territory to an enemy then there is a point at which it becomes rational to attack them with nuclear weapons. That is the application of mutually assured destruction policy to conventional warfare and geopolitics. The storming of west Germany was expected to unfold that way.

Not to mention your UIs are shattered and reduced to rubble.

And it shows as "Anarchy" when clicking a state.

​@@MaliciousIntent327 And also there is a bloody note on the side that says. "All Gone"

lmao

It's more like if the two players with the highest scores on each team suddenly went spectator mode and started placing bets while their teams fought it out.

@@Daniel_Lancelin No, its the tension of the two smartest kids in class waiting for the teacher to finish their question.

Cold war is the typical hero VS evil villain lord but both sides are just villain lords. Like instead of the hero with the sword is just a blue version of the enemy dude and they both send pawns to do biddings and said pawns mirror match as noone moves foward cuz both sides are just lords sitting on differently coloured thrones

Both just camping and hard scoping

Deftly

He didn't said that!!

@@justshrimping742 "Do not trust quotes on the internet, they are fake, they are made-up" - Sun Tzu

@@streamfroster wait? He said that as well !? WHATTT IS HAPPEENNINGGGG!!!!1!!1

Stop quoting my brother -Moon Tzu

😂😂😂

And no kids.

Damn

Ur probably 14

@@robertknight2615 AND YOUR PROBABLY Away down south in the land of traitors Rattlesnakes and alligators Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away Where cotton’s king and men are chattles Union boys will win the battles Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away We’ll all go down to dixie Away, away Each dixie boy must understand That he must mind his uncle sam Away, away We’ll all go down to dixie Away, away I wish I was in baltimore I’d make secession traitors roar right away Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away We'll put the traitors all to route I'll bet my boots we'll whip 'em out Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away We'll all go down to dixie Away, away Each dixie boy must understand That he must mind his uncle sam Away, away We'll all go down to dixie Away, away We'll all go down to dixie Away, away We'll all go down to dixie O may our stars and stripes Still wave forever roar the free and brave Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away And let our motto forever be for union and for liberty Right away (come away) Right away (right away) Come away We'll all go down to dixie Away, away Each dixie boy must understand That he must mind his uncle sam Away, away We'll all go down to dixie! Away, away We’ll all go down To dixie

They could have gone one step further by removing the Score/Point system. Just show the statistics of the casualties. No high score

@@thorstend.888 i think the scoring system was used as a metaphor for how the military can sometimes see these statistics as just being mindless numbers

Millions? Billions.

@@Ghost_of_Avalon Nop

@@Ghost_of_Avalon Billions? Trillions.

"To simulate Nuclear Strike, douse the table in kerosene and toss a match on it." -Official NATO Wargame, probably apocryphal

That’s grim.

@@historymarshal2704 Quite fitting.

@@archierockford1490 Yes. It is.

DEFCON 2: Rome has entered the chat

Yeah but then your just afraid of death it sounds, besides some people/animals have comeback from death technically and some explain what they experienced, since Every thing in this silly Universe ultimately dies it should be a comforting notion - like it’s a milestone

I mean, they had Monster Factory.

If they think DEFCON is spooky (it isn't), they should give Superpower 2 a whirl. [ukposts.info/have/v-deo/gKmci36ihKpy24k.html] Nothing quite like watching millions of your people die, and your economy crash because of a political blunder.

Also - can we stop peddling this "everybody dies" notion, it's making out politicians sloppy and it's just an inaccurate statement. Not even "most people" would die in the event of modern nuclear exchange. Nuclear warheads aren't all that powerful, and people are spread out - killing them, even with nukes, takes 'a lot' of work. China's arsenal for instance is so wimpy that it is mathematically incapable of killing a quarter of the US' populace.

@@mountplusBladeequals but, there is the radiation poisoning, and the fact no life will be able to sustain itself for years, and the fact that most nuclear bomb shelters have been left unattended after the cold war, and that the survivors will die of cancer from the nuclear fallout in the atmosphere... ... Am I missing anything? Not everyone will die, but it will suck for the survivors, not to mention the survivor's guilt and the weakened governments I hope we can agree that we should never have a nuclear war

I'm glad how they didn't launched a single bomb in the Philippines.

Nooo

We're all Plague inc now

hol up

Brazil: Counter Strike

Middle East: cod

Rofl

Damn

TRUE, i was waiting for someone to point that out

worth it! argargargargargargargargargargargargargargargargargrgargagrggargargragragragrag

They're both pretty scary

@@Zeus-ud2jl I mean, Plague Inc isn't scary after you get the message ''JOE MAMA killed over 5 million people'''

@@Zeus-ud2jl yeah but plauge inc is more abstract

@@Shadow_Witch lol yea but the atmosphere it gives and the noises it makes and you think this could happen

@@killerfishe5092 still spooks me think it could happen

So what is 7.8 Billion?

extinction

A killstreak

Salvation

@@LongandWeirdName /kill all

End of Ze World was suprisingly accurate in this regard.

There's a book about that called On The Beach, I recommend you read it.

@Alp Quite true

Ya wasn’t the movie *Mad Max* all about that? ... should be fun

worry anyway, I think you have some american nuke bases so they'll aim for you too

I fall asleep to his voice every night before bed I cannot be swayed.

I was thinking that too XD

Probably because the study just had a transcript of the comment and polygon made it work better in this medium.

It says "dramatic reading"

Oh god he’s trapped in that cassette, how do we free him?!

My 2 moods

Dojyaaaaan~

President Valentine?

I know right

D4C

Everybody forgets Australia

@@theslenderfox Eh, the starvation will get them if the natural disasters and wildlife don' t get them first

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Beach_(novel)

@UCXidC8Cir-T8RRKheZ0CeHA I was talking about in case of a nuclear winter, but I can understand where the confusion comes from. Outside of a nuclear winter, you are entirely correct.

"So now we've got nuclear winter. Everyone's dead 'cept Australia and they're still like "WTF? ^^" But they'll be dead soon... F*ckin kangaroos..."

CAAAAAAAARL

CAAAARRRLLL, why did you point all of Russia's nukes at the U.S.?

Caaarrrllllll why did you commit mass nuclear destruction

@@papaahd7566 Hey, I said I was going green didn’t I. I wanted to help the environment.

Carl, why did you start WW3?

Underrated comment

done before but still funny

@@SilentFox. overdone joke

Meh. cut him some slack guys. Everyone needs some likes every once in a while.

@@entityxkid244 sure, but that did make me smile. That's a well deserved like

*stares at madagascar in a cold sweat* Yea that's what I'm scared of.

In plague inc, the humanity dies by a sickness In DEFECON, the humanity dies by a war

Defecon

@@ImKevax At least sickness dies alongside us in defcon. A nucler explosion is like sun on earth. I doubt anything survives that heat

@@ImKevax *In DEFCON, humanity dies by it's own hand FTFY

100th like

What does winning mean when there's so little left? I wonder if they'll care. Because the only alternative is losing. Right?

@@jh9981 Because that is the mentality of countries but in this scenario nobody wins

@@Woodledude I imagine the situation as a situation you shouldn't really think about. If a country would attack you, you have to strike back and everyone loses. period. However, if you think about it, if the enemy already launched the missiles, you can't. Someone has to live, even if it means you don't.

Sombody has to win....but no one is willing to give up

"After us - silence". © Strategic Missile Forces

@@alexeyrodiontsev4978 well that's so much darker

I agree; more countries need to make nukes to enforce the peace against a certain belligerent going around bombing, invading and spreading coups

Hotel is Trivago

@Panzerkampfwagen VI ...deez

If they are not more alive, how is that measurable? And how does it actually matter?

@@VJFranzK Whoever dies last, wins.

@@ursosexmachina We're not talking highschool football, or your FPS here. It's not really a win if there's no one left, friend or foe, to congratulate you. The real, grown-up concept of victory of the human species has been our survival. Survival of future generations isn't possible in a world contaminated by radiation. The "winners" might suffer in the longest, most terrible way.

@@VJFranzK More people are alive. If the US loses 100 million but Russia loses 150 million, the US has "won" the nuclear exchange.

So somebody wins, because losing less than others in any sport = winning, what matters is score compared to the others. Hahaha

I'm 13 and this is deep...

You can't be more accurate than this

@Deo That's some nice coolaid you're drinking, hoping the money put in the military aren't detracting in any way from your inalienable human rights. What's that? You must pay for an education? What's a health insurance?

Now we know, the Deep States and some rich houses are behind these wars. There is a reason you have to suffer so much. Don’t like it? No worry, they offer cannibalism and corruption, if you want to end your misery. Guess what, you will take it just like you let the all the things happened in 2020.

"nothing more terrible that what they *were forced to do* " is more accurate I think. When one is unfortunate enough to find oneself on an active battlefield, fighting for survival, the only true choice is kill or be killed. It sends a chill down my spine just to think about that proposition, about having to indiscriminately and in cold blood take the life of another human being. Another man who might very well have a beautiful wife, not to mention children who will now never get to know their father simply because I believed my life to be more valuable. Another man who, if only times had been different, might even have become my best friend, possibly for life. War truly has no winners, but only pitiful losers, forced to kill indiscriminately and without question, only for the unlucky survivors to end up damaged, broke, lonely and forgotten; rotting away in a veterans home. To use an already horribly overused saying; war never determines who is right, only who is left.

the only ever 2 bombs used was for that reason, its really terrifying. how you fight something who is not afraid of dying, they will never lose. it was really useful we had a thing to really put fear in their hearths (and it took 2, when only one should have sufficed, that level of not wanting to lose...). I would totally chose that option if I were in the same place, who wouldn't ? two splashes and it ended the war. people like to talk about the cost of lives, but with that enemy, nothing would stop it, that probably saved more lives than the never-ending thousand year war. The other option would be surrender, good luck with that, the imperator would just kill you, because of their moral code that punish deserters, and you deserted your country (an enemy of the enemy is not an ally), so you must die too , not to mention horrific things that would make literal hitler puke.

@@monad_tcp if they didn't use nuclear weapons, the war in Japan would've extended by a few years, but the outcome would've been the same. Some argue that if they killed the god-emperor of Japan, they would've surrendered. Either way, nuking 2 cities like that, killing over 200k citizens...it's unforgiveable.

@@brian14021994 so youd rather them invade and risk killing millions more than the nukes would have?

What’s more terrifying than someone who doesn’t want to lose, is someone who doesn’t care if they do, as long as you don’t win.

@@coregontrail3481 and thats why N.Korea having nukes has the world on edge

You know he never actually said that, a fictional depiction of Stalin said it, Never trust quotes or witty sayings.

Cyber Pop while you are technically correct in saying that, it is still disputed whether he said it, as a columnist in 1947 did attribute that quote to Stalin in a meeting with his commissars.

@@yeetusdeleteus1305 I wouldn't say that exactly because it is a phrase that has been used multiple times dating back to 1759

Rockie Technically that isn’t theoretically a valid statement according to the proclamation of youtube back in 1529 therefore making thus making this quote impossible to human civilization

STONKS

Lol

Considering how a lot of politicians are likely to be actual psychopaths, I don't think it will help much.

You act as if politicians care about people

Will not make any difference or they would not be politicians themselves.

I mean they probably know, and if they dont know about the consequences, 😂😂well we call them kim jong un

why play this game if they can slowly perform it in real life?

uh oh

the game is about cold war so ICBM's came out new in the cold war era

12?

@@carlredfield1693 In continental Europe, it is common for commas and periods to be swapped e.g: 10,000.1 (ten thousand point one) is written as 10.000,1

The huge numbers - and it's far reduced from the height of the Cold War in the 80s - was a calculus between NATO and the Soviets that if the other side launched a pre-emptive strike most of the nuclear arsenal would be destroyed on the ground before it could launch. Therefore, even assuming you've lost the vast majority of your own nuclear weapons, you'd still theoretically have enough left to retaliate and destroy whoever attacked you. This acts as a deterrent against the other side launching that pre-emptive strike in the first place. Since no nuclear wars have started since, the theory works.

Plague*

Exactly

In Plague Inc there's no fight, and you're just a bacteria trying to follow the circle of life but here it's actual humans cassuing mass deaths of one another through vaporizing each other's flesh

@@Saint_Wolf_ Plague Inc Is Also Mass Human deaths If You win You Kill Every Single Human

@@jj.jayjay. Sure but in terms of how things work, one is just a bacteria/virus, here's the progress of technology halting itself through its own makers.

Hitting cities _is_ realistic in nuclear war. Industrialized warfare is dependent on manpower and production. You hit cities, you destroy factories, obliterate shipyards, kill off skilled workers, and their families... You're not just winning a war by defeating the enemy's existing forces and driving them back. You're destroying a population's ability to even _participate_ in anything even remotely approaching industrialized warfare for *generations*. Escalating to DEFCON 1 is All or Nothing. If you don't have the gumption to take a deep breath, and push the button, and make the opposition pay in equal blood to what they just launched on you,? Then you die. And nobody will be around to care since the only thing you're really doing is that the other guy is just as crippled as to have to spend just as much time as you to rebuild society. It's PURE retaliation logic. And it helps manage MAD by the concept that even if we know we're going to die, we're vindictive enough to take the other side with us. DEFCON operates on the simple assumption that for whatever reason, MAD has broken down, nations are on the edge, and the time for 'limited' warfare has passed you like a Porsche going the other way. It IS possible to actually... WIN a game of DEFCON. When I say win, I MEAN win. No losses of population. I've done it precisely once. It required some pretty fine-tuned management of your silos swapping from ABM and Silo mode and a little bit of praying to RNGeezus that the enemy nations distributed their ICBM launches juuuuuust right.

why mass murder the ai if the point of the game is seeing they have been attacking you all along an you are their god

Realistically, limiting targeting to only military assets could only work if you made a preemptive strike during DEFCON 5 or 4 on New Year's Eve when everyone is drunk. You might have some success at DEFCON 3 but you are still going to be hurt bad. At DEFCON 2 or 1 you will be hitting empty silos (their counter strike will be in the air, headed towards you) or conventional units which pose no threat to you. All that assumes that you launch first. If you are reacting to their launch, your only choice is to do nothing in the hopes that they survive or you can ensure that they burn with you.

@@atigerclaw The winning with population intact sounds very interesting,is there any video or step to step to do it ?

@@jamesbrendan5170 There isn't. Like I said, I did it precisely once and I'm pretty sure I couldn't duplicate it on demand because it requires both crazy-good handling of when and where you switch your silos, and a good chunk of RNGeezus. Who shoots at who at what time and how much so as not to overwhelm your defenses. I'd think of it more like winning a card game. There's skill involved, but it comes down to what you're dealt.

It was and still is Strategic Missile Forces motto.

О! рашшн

Now i use that as my fam moto xaxaxaxaxa

transliteration: Posle Nas - Tishina

(-Krstit će se i ko neće-) motto

Animalogic?

@@DerAykac No, it’s a meme. Look up “peace was never an option goose” and you’ll find it

@@zildiun2327 You sure it's a goose?

@@zildiun2327 it’s from a untitled goose game

@@lilchristuten7568 ye

the plague just kills humans, defcon kills life itself

Except Australia, we're fine down here

@@TheWulf899 until nuclear winter begins...

@@CarlosRuiz20 thats right if fallaout teach something: "if the bo,b dont kill you the secondary effects will do it"

Imagine if they make second game mode where you...yes you become the UN leader (United Nations) and prevent the world from killing itself *Dictator gamemode:Can you destroy the world?* *Humanity last hope gamemode: Can you save the world?*

*bodyslams the nuke table*

@@kathrynb.kavanagh2621 GIBBEH OOF

No it’s actually having 100’s of robots at high speed pressing 100’s of buttons per second for each robot

paniiiik!!! mode activated

Yeah DEFCON 1 is nuclear war. 2 is nuclear war is imminent

Yeah this did not age well at all

Real life _Defcon_ !

Everyone is on DEFCON 3 Especially Russia

We're at defcon 2 now.

RISK is more terrifying.

...isn't that plague Inc?

@@clanofclams2720 in the video it talks about coughing and crying in the soundtrack.

@@screamingghoul4108 no it dudn't

@@clanofclams2720 2:46 yes it did? here, he talks about.

@@screamingghoul4108 nah, he dudn't

i would love to see that

@@zekeyeager6444 Check out Espiocracy (comes out in 2024) - I don't know if it'll go super in depth with the actual nuking (It probably will though), but it's an awesome spy game and it WILL have nuclear war - And assuming some of your agents survive, you can even keep kicking and screaming after the exchange ends. In fact, the nuclear war will be less "Nuclear war" and more cold war era sabre rattling (with a chance of nuclear war if a LOT of mistakes are made), so it'll be even more realistic than what isbestlizard wants.

Check out Espiocracy. I go more in depth in my reply to the other commenter on your comment, so feel free to read it.

This is should be top comment 😂👌

Ironically, check this out, some sort of Chess+Defcon hybrid ukposts.info/have/v-deo/fZOqaYeQh4V91XU.html

Xanatos Speed Chess

Chess on sleep paralysis

Chess with a minor change in rules where any piece can take any other piece on the board from any position on the board along with all adjacent pieces, and every piece on the board moves simultaneously.

True. But surely there's a middle step where UKposts analyzes the current searches and the user's history and generates the algorithm, possibly even factoring in how likely an individual user might click on a certain video. Definitely not "random" but it's not like they are personally curating these things.

@@jovianblue wonderful evaluation.

It's not random..

you called me?

... o.o

UKposts algorithm, the all seeing eye

The algorithm responds to trends. People search, it responds. Nothing more.

So does that mean that Sandy would be the first person to send off nukes?

The game isn’t even that scary. It’s actually great. Polygon reporters are just overdramatic

I mean actually it's not scary at all, I know.

That's the point. The scarry thing is that the game isn't scarry.

Používaťeľ JUtUbe no, it’s not the point. It’s just a fun strategy game where you launch nuclear missiles at each other. Everyone tries way too hard to get internet points by being a pseudo intellectual.

The man that save the world

For those who don't understand: This is the person who played a key role during 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident and did not press the retaliatory attack button because he decided that was impossible and it was a failure of the warning system (he was right). Thus, he violated military protocol, but saved the world from nuclear war.

He is... Saviour of humanity...

@@NiketasIgnatius Petrov's story is largely inflated by journalists. In fact, he did not have any "retaliatory attack button". Petrov was the operational officer on duty at the Command Center of the OKO (ICBM launch detection satellite system), which was only one part of the Soviet missile attack warning system. And he only had to confirm (or not confirm) to his superiors the missile launch warning, received from his system. The final decision about the validity of the launch was made by the 820th Main Missile Attack Warning Center - basing on the analysis of all data from all USSR missile attack warning systems (including early warning radar network). In 1983, while Petrov was on duty, the automatic part of the OKO generated a launch warning: "one ICBM launch from the territory of the USA", and then three more launch warnings. The 820th Center, which automatically received this information, demanded confirmation from Petrov. The "manual" part of the OKO system (visual control operators at OKO Command Center) did not confirm the launches. Flares from engines of flying ICBMs were also not detected. Accordingly, Petrov did not confirm the launches and reported about a false triggering of the OKO system. Moreover, the OKO system at that time, although it was put into service in 1982, was considered unreliable. So, the data from it was initially considered as "confirmation required".

@Hatwox Because human beings have this need to create and exaggerate stories to make individuals heroic. No one wants to talk about a well-designed system working as intended. But a person going against the system to heroically save the day? Oh people will eat that up regardless of how close or far from reality it actually is. Look back at all the various exaggerated war stories of individual soldiers or commanders "going against orders" or otherwise bucking the system to "save the day".

Yup listening to him say that and listening to the Gulag Archipelago..... I'm terrified rn

Yeah, and a relic of cold war in charge of USA in 21th century has nothing to do with it

pls

[\^/] 343 Guilty Spark it’s the only good thing to come out of Russia being nuked. And for America it’s fallout

Ah,nothing like squatting with comrades in Metro Moscow

@Wee Pinbell ah, imagine a crossover, for both metro and fallout to meet. Old enemies, now just survival in a collapsed world, but is rebuilding or dieing out depends on how you see it.

I thought this was a reference to the secret KGB metro in Moscow that *100% doesn't exist*

Declan Van Arkel they left you guys out because you already got terrifying animals that’s worse than even the nukes

Come on your country loses to your own national animals....pretty sure you're no threat to the world yet lol(this a joke btw)

Omega Storm ahaha I can’t argue with you there

Incoming fallout for us Aussies.

That's because the nukes just go to space rather then hit Australia because everything is upside-down.

Yeah, I'm also here because of Kanye

I came here after coldline

same

What can you play it on?

Oh, and body horror. Lots of body horror.

@@josephray459 it's on steam! :)

It’s free on steam, calls it the demo but it’s really not

Lmao

They actually have enough bunkers to fit their whole population, so they really could. Good luck colonizing and rebuilding the whole world though.

Nope ,a year after they also die once food and water in the bunker ends and thirst drives everyone out to drink radioactive contaminated water then the cough ,cough gets real ...it is called acute leukemia ...

if switzerland is coughing that's covid *dies*

@@fsands69 ok i will edit it

As a kid? How old is the game?

@@El_Presidente_5337 it came out in 06

@@mikemar2002 O . O

Where do I get this?

@@kurdonthego Steam! Great developer too, check out their other projects ^-^

"scariest game ever" brotherhood of cain (post-taboristky) events

Its been 6 months, Gerald. He's dead.

I am always curious If nuclear powers actually need to select their targets during a nuclear war or they are just stored data and to avoid wasting time they just aim to every single city in the world

@@v44n7 The more likely scenario is they have tactical targeting abilities so they can fire one or more missiles in a counter retaliatory or preemptive strike, and predetermined scenarios to target military, industrial, infrastructure, and civilian assets based on which country they're going to war with and where/when/how hard to strike in a given wave, from limited to total release. So a destination bar with an optional drop down country menu.

@@v44n7 Aside from submarine based missiles all land silos have pre determined primary and secondary targets pre programmed into the launch systems. Sub based are more fluid and reactionary missile system where the commander can very quickly give them new coordinates as needed. Even so sub commanders will also have predetermined targets in his deployment orders package. Generally targets for multiple nuclear hits will be ports, major industrial sites, and military sites. Secondary targets are large population centers such as cities and large towns.

that is exactly why there are no new people in places like these

It was Mike again?

Yes but in nuclear war: everybody dies because in nuclear war there are no winners. First the alarms from the sirens and the screams from those who are panicking before the nukes go off and then silence and crying. Grim silence.