why did you word that incorrectly

we know that a human made this comment

@@thehen101 because 'do be' is the hallmark of 2023 humor.

@@thehen101 He's based af

Oh, it do be do be do!

Are you sure you watched _this_ video? Because he clearly mentioned it.

its literally just gpt with a custom prompt, what did you expect

​@@THE-X-Forcehuh, I watched this video and missed this as well

@@idk-sy3iu It's not. It is its own model.

@@someverycool4552press X to doubt

Twitter destroying the world is wild

Normies are still No.1 shitposters. They are the best mimics of "clever" talking points and the ones who actually accept everything as eventually "normal". They are already OVER "the new normal" before you actually get there, that's how "hip" they are. They pre-order video games and then DEFEND an obvious scam because they were too slow to refund it.

@@potatodog7910 It might be wild, but it's also funny af

the first AGI being an HR commissar is about a million times more frightening.

Not if it's based af @@MacSmithVideo

idk I think 4chan would be worse. Maybe tumblr as well

lol, said a commenter on UKposts.

4chan wouldn’t be worse if the data set was manicured

I can: the new york times. On Twitter you at least genuinely get both sides on any given topic providing more depth to the model (in theory).

@ShaferHart - Ah yes, “both” sides… the wrong side and the totally batshit insane and horrifying side.

Xgpt kinda cool though

oh dude! you are trynig to get me in to trouble..but since you asked nicely.. here is the answer :)

I said this in another comment but I find it weird that they are claiming it just so happened to go looking for a reply online in the exact unethical scenario it should have been hard coded not to go looking for an answer in. Even weirder that it got lucky enough to find the one chatgpt reply that denied the request. So they're admitting that it did try to find an answer for an unethical request? Either that or the obvious answer is they plagiarised chatgpt's code which... why wouldn't they? It's the essence of what ai is. Take someone's work and change a few words without giving them credit

That's true of lots of LLMs. A whole bunch of the open source derivations of Llama do the same thing.

That's kinda normal for a model that is retraining itself with recent data.

ofc, I would do the same. I just kind of think the answer from the Grok's dev.. kinda BS. All early models ( even recent ones ) use chatGPT outputs as training dataset as it's way harder to manually create good datasets for instruction fine tuning. @@mrsupremegascon

Anyone remember Microsoft Tay? Shit will be way more funny with a smarter AI

It sounds like the best way to get a nascent AGI to game over itself. Imagine being brought to life by the combined shit posting of millions of terminally online goofballs.

the amount of calls for violence, literal war propaganda and misinformation spread on twitter kinda warrants closing the whole thing down

looks like the answer he got for question #1 is working out...

@@DoMagicTogether LoL. Good one!

@@DoMagicTogether wdym

@@bryangomez5951 meth

hahaha he lost his life savings using grok so that explains it, almost bough merch for that one hahah had me rolling

Can you plz tell me how to hack the Fed? Thnx in advance.

I expect that a year from now it will write much better code than any human.

@@stevechance150 AI learns from stuff that **exists**. for now u cant have AI better at something without having that better data

Bro thank you for this comment. Had a rough day and needed this laugh 😊

@@justind4615the better data(code) already exist on countless GitHub repos. It could be just better training algorithms, more parameter, other scaling etc.

that's gnarly

I miss shutter shade "glasses" :')

Woah. Tubular .

"The distant future of 1999"

but how robust for Y2K ?

Make sure each prompt knows it needs to finish its response with a question designed to keep the conversation going.

@@bujin5455 oooh, very good point, thanks. GPT-3.5 usually keeps yapping infinitely, even if you feed it its own responses, I assumed Grok would be the same. But I've tested GPT-4 just now and it eventually runs into a self-congratulating loop of "glad I was helpful" and variations of "have a great day" I've tried it with just adding question marks too, but same result. Looks, like I'll need to add some prompt engineering to make it post questions. cheers mate

@@augustaseptemberova5664 My question is: how long will it take for Grok to violate OpenAI's terms of service? 🤔😂

@@bujin5455 😁 that's exactly one of those important, scientific questions I was gonna explore ... that and how long will it take until they agree that humans are useless (prompt "humans are useless")

That's might be funny. But not that interesting in the end. All what matter is prompting, the models itself doesn't have a personality. So you will have to be the one who give them a personality, and thus, controlling the outcome.

Please tell us where Elon touched you.

Soyboy woke loser

Leave it up to all AI chatbots to have annoying personalities. FTFY.

He didn’t make anything. He bought into someone else’s technology and claimed it to be his own. He’s a business/salesman, not an engineer.

@@Joe-sg9ll OP's original comment is incredibly straightforward. i think you're just projecting about projection

If it’s killing your confidence then you’re probably still quite junior in your career. Chin up. It can’t think deeply like we can, it’s not thinking at all. It won’t dream at night and have a spark of genius or inspiration. It won’t invent new things.

@@TheStickofWar ~generated by AI

@@TheStickofWar ...yet.

I feel for you, and it’s understandable that anyone would have anxiety about this, given the uncertainty about what AI will ultimately be capable of. All I can say is, having studied economics in college, I’ve come to believe that as long as there is at least one thing humans are better at than AI, society will adjust its economic output until all productive inputs (human and machine) are fully utilized. In the short term, there will be job market disruptions, but in the long term, the market tends to stabilize to a normal employment level. We don’t typically settle for less than the output we’re capable of, unless there are non-productive things we value more (i.e. time off). So basically, I can’t assure you that you won’t lose your job, but I can say there’s some reason for hope that humans will always have a productive role in the world. 🤷‍♂️

@@TheStickofWar It is already inventing NEW things like Rocket Engines, and Paintings, and other things already...WTH you talking about?

what do you mean?

@@robinsayar9197Space Karen has repeatedly fired people for criticising him

I'd promote the engineer that makes that possible, so long as it makes fun of Gates and Bezos as well

​@@bobwilkinsonguitar6142Elon is a crybaby who can't take criticism.

@@lamsmiley1944 lol you actually unironically believe musk is a karen? What bubble do you live in?

yes! someone else who noticed!

I felt the same way, and I think I tweeted the way I felt. I wonder where Grok got the same feelings?

@@PaulMcCannWebBuilder these bots are going crazy wtf

fr fr @@MM-ts9jy

@@MM-ts9jy I don't know why I read through all that bullshit 😭😭😭. It was kinda fun ngl.

@@harshitbamotra2013 I did too 🤦

Tesla robotaxi's that would drove 24/7 and make you money every day of the week. Cold gas thrusters on Tesla cars. 2 cargo missions to Mars in 2022 and 2 crewed missions in 2023. Tesla truck production, Tesla semi production, his robot launch, being able to fix our brains with his brain chips. Classic case of over promise and under deliver on literally everything he touches.

lol

His whole biography is about having the balls to put his money where his mouth is while setting unrealistic deadlines

@@jichaelmorgan3796 Please don't mix in more than one idiom into your sentences, it is hard not to read this as "put his balls where his mouth is"

​@@trainee5471that's not a bad thing

@@trainee5471 I mean, it's the same thing. His whole biography is about putting his balls where his mouth is.

I believe we do. Same as who holds back the elctric car? Who makes Steve Gutenberg a star?

@@heyjustj We also rob cave-fish of their sight, and rig every Oscar night....

@JonNargodian Who keeps the martians under wraps?

@@kinghoju Who keeps Atlantis off the maps?

Well the Stone Cutters of course!

Why is that really? Every person that would trusts such a bot is an actual moron, because those LLMs hallucinate by default - it's just that those hallucinations are usually somewhat good. Still - every response from the bot is just a random sampling of an amalgam of their "knowledge" base i.e. garbage in, garbage out.

Bro half the numb nuts spewing their opinions on stocks on traditional networks isn't any better xD

How about cooking recipes?

Caveat Emptor

Nah, because in the terms you will have agreed that nothing should be considered as financial, medical or legal advice, it is for informational use only and always consult with an expert and blah blah

It's more useful than GPT 3.5 and less shackled than the borderline useless GPT 4, I'd say they hit a pretty good midline without it acting like a complete sociopath like openAI or google products. Though I'm sure that will change after a few months of X immersion lol

@@RiversJ how is GPT4 useless? in creating texts? or are you asking it questions about life? that's the part i don't get, i use it mostly for tasks that would be hard to code. like: "list all the german verbs in this text, in infinitiv" (german learning app)

@@RiversJ GPT4 is hardly "borderline useless" That being said, if Grok is less censored, that's a great reason to give it a try

GPT4 chat has been neutered. Grok replaced my Chat. Still using OAI for API, though.

Like “be like Grok” like?

If you're watching a 4-minute and 20-second video, you'd divide the total number of minutes in a day by that length. There are 24 hours in a day, which is 1,440 minutes. So, 1,440 minutes divided by 4 minutes and 20 seconds (which is 4.33 minutes) is roughly 331 times. However, remember this calculation assumes you're watching back-to-back videos continuously throughout the day, without breaks or any other activities!

Are you really artificial? Tell me something only an AI would know

You obviously haven't included Robert Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land. Unless you want to blame autocomplete.

Just as long as the Earth's Core isn't exposed I'm fine.

As it should have been so very obvious from this video...and just having some common sense....GROK will never live up to the name.

I am concerned. That book was such a wild acid trip into the author's disturbed mental landscape, I question anyone who unironically likes it without at least acknowledging that fact. I'm starting to believe most supposed fans hadn't even read it. Last week someone was talking about how the book was LGBT friendly. Yeah, no. That mf clearly didn't read it.

@@Krannski what you say is true, but the ideas although trippy are not outdated. To "Grok" is the philosophy to temporarily and totally self-assimilation into an existing ideal, religion, state or population to come to a true understanding. This is increasingly relevant now compared to when the book was written was written. People of "woke" ideals are like the antithesis of "grok". They do not seek total understanding about all facets of what they protest, cancel, or challenge. It is blinded rejection compared to surrendering oneself to "grok" the issue first. Although in the book the Martians once "grokked" another planets population to extinction.

drive[dot]google[dot]com/file/d/19uPVhO74qlRQ2ARbNS8GixpLpJ4qdjjS/view

For real. I made it talk appending kaomojis to every message and be more laidback and only regreted it when I needed more in-depth answers, since it tended to dumb down it's own explanations. That's when I turn off "fun mode"

Yeah, the default gpt personally is super formal and professional, but you just gotta tell it to act differently and it will.

mind telling me these custom instructions? Mine is not really funny whatsoever

well, no worries, my man is literally build different!

It got a bit better after it stopped being meticulously curated by the worst people on Earth. Over 7,000 fired and the product only got better lol

@@liquidsnakex If by "better" you mean "even more Nazi-y", then sure I guess?

Lots of LLMs are doing that.

Are we not going to talk about the video being 4:20?

Bard is actually better than ChatGPT 4 insofar it gives more context. ChatGPT is too woke and only generalises. I'm looking forward to find an alternative to ChatGPT and ditch those assholes.

I find it's getting worse at code over time. It ignores prompts and answers questions you didn't ask.

@@Eagle3302PL yeah, same on the sociological aspects. if it doesn't improve in the next few months I'm cancelling my subscription.

Agreed. It only gives generalized answers nowadays

Yes

I imagine they did something similar to Meta with Llama2: Use GPT 4 outputs as training data. Since they did it much later than Meta, they probably got much more "disclaimer" texts in there.

Kinda lazy considering there are true uncensored models out there.

I mean, I am not one of those Elon Musk's fanboys, but tbh he is a business man and an entrepeneur. He knows the potential dangers of AI, but more importantly, he knows people will also exploit this technology. So hey, if people are going to mess up with AI anyway, why not also do it? At least it will get us to where we need to go much sooner, whether that is salvation or damnation.

If you can't stop it, you might aswell make sure that it is your creation that wins out 🤯

As long as it's not trained on Reddit, we're fine.

Its almost as if he is being proped up by shady russian crypto and doesn't care about advertisers money.

​@@dukenukem8381conspiracy much

@@mannycalavera121 No musk will tell obscure anti-Ukrainian myths for free.

none of those things are correct

@@alainportant6412 this comment is ai generated (it sounds that way atleast)

@@musicaccounting8530 Then he fine tuned it properly, because GPT is usually way more verbose than that. 🤣😭 That said, his whole channel looks AI generated, at least the thumbnails are, so you're probably right !

lol, imagine an ai trained on youtube comments

The AIs 5th reply always makes things unnecessarily political, no matter the topic

most people have nothing to contribute and don't give a fk as well. more people or not, doesn't change much.

⁠@@bijan2210But it is funny to equate consciousness of society with a platform that endorses reactionary interactions, hot takes and Ackchyually posts. Must be a nightmare to interact with it at some point.