Joe Rogan: "I Wasn't Afraid of AI Until I Learned This"

  Переглядів 5,278,407

JRE Daily Clips

JRE Daily Clips

День тому

FREE Alpha Brain Trial ► onnit.sjv.io/LPvLgM
CODE: jredaily for 10% off other purchases ► onnit.sjv.io/jWPr2e
Sub for daily JRE clips! ► / @jredailyclips
Onnit Affiliated.
Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin are the co-founders of the Center for Humane Technology and the hosts of its podcast, "Your Undivided Attention." Watch the Center's new film "The A.I. Dilemma" on UKposts.
Clip taken from JRE #2076 w/ Aza Raskin & Tristan Harris
Host: Joe Rogan
Guests: Aza Raskin & Tristan Harris
Producer: Jamie Vernon
#jre #joerogan #ai #chatgpt

КОМЕНТАРІ: 8 200
@danielswann3319
@danielswann3319 4 місяці тому
Fascinating that at the same time AI is learning how to think our children are being dumbed down
@pranavmarla
@pranavmarla 4 місяці тому
I think that is only because the education system is built for a different world. AI can make education much much better but unfortunately, I think the only way the system changes is when things get bad for children. I think the rate at which AI is developing, we will be forced to change in the next 3 years.
@seannewcomb7594
@seannewcomb7594 4 місяці тому
This has been happening long before AI buddy lol.
@mr.v2689
@mr.v2689 4 місяці тому
@@pranavmarlalolllll it’s happening because silts like you make moronic statements like that. You ever hear of the company store?
@danielswann3319
@danielswann3319 4 місяці тому
@@seannewcomb7594 amping up
@last-life
@last-life 4 місяці тому
Remove phones. Remove social media. Remove shorts. Remove news. All detrimental
@bittertwistedcynicsmckay2441
@bittertwistedcynicsmckay2441 4 місяці тому
"I need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle..." - It begins.
@GuldeScott
@GuldeScott 4 місяці тому
Thats a good song.
@ensabanur768
@ensabanur768 3 місяці тому
Yep.
@Patpatgat
@Patpatgat 3 місяці тому
T-1000
@southlondon86
@southlondon86 3 місяці тому
Then we simply say “You forgot to say please”
@dougdillenbeck-jz1gd
@dougdillenbeck-jz1gd 3 місяці тому
Just take a look at the bodyguards the super rich have, scary
@KermitOfWar
@KermitOfWar 2 місяці тому
Commander Shepard did warn us about the Reapers...
@Ron-ni8uu
@Ron-ni8uu 2 місяці тому
Yes I killed the ai in the game tali was happy
@jeffjohnson5053
@jeffjohnson5053 Місяць тому
Hey, AI, build me the Ironman Suit!! Hey, AI, build me the Star Trek Warp engine!! I love it!! Hurry up AI, lets get the ball rolling!!
@SpenceCurry
@SpenceCurry 8 днів тому
Don't fear the reapers
@akshaysunkara7029
@akshaysunkara7029 Місяць тому
There are so many things wrong about this, its crazy: First of all, a transformer is simply an architecture of a neural network. In the beginning he states that transformers are new AI models that learn more if you give it more data; that is literally the case with EVERY AI. That also comes with many advantages AND disadvantages. The other thing he said was that one of the neurons in the transformer model OpenAI was testing was able to be the world's best at sentiment analysis; this is simply not true and that is not how AI works. All these neurons simply hold values and work together to solve an object. So, for example, if you were asked to tell whether a message is happy or sad (0 or 1), the model's neuron at the end either says 0 or 1 based on the activation function. So, to summarize, a single neuron can't be crazy good at sentiment analysis. Also he says that AI is something we don't completely understand yet: not true AT ALL. Honestly, it's really all math. If you wanted, you could literally take a notebook and do the exact same process an AI follows. We literally made AIs and we know exactly what happens. It's written out to be this "Black Box" which is simply not true. The only instance when this is true is during its training process, which doesn't really matter much anyways. I'm not tryna make these guys sound stupid or anything, they're prolly wayyy smarter than I am. It's just I don't want people to be afraid of AI for reasons they shouldn't be right now. This is nothing compared to some of the things AI can already do lol.
@Tech-geeky
@Tech-geeky Місяць тому
no one has vision, that's the problem... If we can't even fix problems now, whats the hope for advanced stuff like AI? Sure, it will have use cases *in the right hands*, but like everything, it will also come at a cost in the wrong ones. Think the atomic bomb.. The U.S dropped then ending WW2 in Japan.. Glad to see it made THEM happy about that. :P
@joseisamen
@joseisamen Місяць тому
This 👆👆. Everyone is like "shit!! AI is Armageddon".... and the reality is that NO, AI is quite "simple" and for now, it's mathematically and technologically impossible that some AI takes control of the world
@Tech-geeky
@Tech-geeky Місяць тому
​@@joseisamen Having a vision of "would could" is much more important. but "now" is crap.. I don't wanna look at the end of my nose. With all the math that says 'its impossible', have the NSA cracked anything today? sure they have, but 10 years ago, we would of saying the same "it's impossible" No one knew the NSA could crack encyption either, but look how that turned out
@Mohammadmohammad-fx5bz
@Mohammadmohammad-fx5bz Місяць тому
Oppenhiemer didnt believe splitting the atom was possible at first
@akshaysunkara7029
@akshaysunkara7029 Місяць тому
@@Tech-geeky Never said its not impossible. It is very possible and I genuinely believe in the future there is a way we implement mathematical models strong and powerful enough to replicate life. I was simply pointing out that this guy is full of crap and is spewing misinformation. He's saying that this will happen very soon and is already becoming possible when we are decades away from developing that technology. The information he's given is also wildly incorrect.
@user-hc2yd4vw7t
@user-hc2yd4vw7t 4 місяці тому
One of my favorite things about listening to Joe Rogan, he and his guests SO RARELY interrupt one another. These people are so respectful of one another, and when people act like this, it IS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE to understand what everyone is saying!.ty Joe, for another fascinating show.
@mak.ak.uk.
@mak.ak.uk. 4 місяці тому
100% - its an actual conversation and we can learn more from either/both sides even if we disagree with them
@saturobi
@saturobi 4 місяці тому
His guests are painfully ignorant of the topic in question. LLM's progress is largely attributed to reinforcement learning.
@jonnyOysters
@jonnyOysters 4 місяці тому
Rogan does this by making everyone use headphones so you hear if you're talking over people.
@Jaded368
@Jaded368 4 місяці тому
Super agreed
@patrickpatino3651
@patrickpatino3651 3 місяці тому
Tell that to Bert😂
@JohnnyAquaholic
@JohnnyAquaholic 4 місяці тому
Every time I listen to or read something about AI, I immediately think of Dr. Malcolm in Jurassic Park. "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
@bryanpeed5334
@bryanpeed5334 4 місяці тому
Same!!
@KlausKusserow-ClassicalGuitar
@KlausKusserow-ClassicalGuitar 4 місяці тому
So we create our god.
@JohnnyAquaholic
@JohnnyAquaholic 4 місяці тому
@@KlausKusserow-ClassicalGuitar I would rephrase that with, "We choose our faith."
@the_arrogance
@the_arrogance 4 місяці тому
Who copied who's comment?
@mccock3154
@mccock3154 4 місяці тому
Our enemies will devleop AI and use it against us so it's not a rational choice to not to develop AI
@blakkauldronmusic5280
@blakkauldronmusic5280 Місяць тому
These guys would be a great rap duo. Dude hops in, comments and hops out strategically.
@Nick-qn6sp
@Nick-qn6sp 3 дні тому
😂😂😂😂
@andyabraham7375
@andyabraham7375 14 годин тому
best for adlips
@rogerjordan8998
@rogerjordan8998 2 місяці тому
Here is a thought experiment. In Isaac Asimov's Foundation Trilogy, there was a scientist (Harry Seldom) who founded the science of psychohistory. This allowed for the prediction of the future based on predicting society's reaction to narratives/policies/events, etc. This sounds a lot like "predictive" AI. AI doesn't need to exterminate or enslave us, it only needs to psychologically convince us that it is all good.
@Dennis-nc3vw
@Dennis-nc3vw 4 місяці тому
What drives me up the wall is that no one talks about the threat AI poses as a means of censorship. Censorship is 1000X more dangerous if people don't know its happening, and AI could detect "problematic" opinions and censor them instantaneously. It would be an invisible form of censorship.
@KBRoller
@KBRoller 4 місяці тому
How would it be invisible?
@wrongthinkery8357
@wrongthinkery8357 4 місяці тому
@@KBRollerno one would know it’s happening, like when you get shadow banned.
@jadedandbitter
@jadedandbitter 4 місяці тому
It already happens on UKposts. The comment just doesn't get posted. But it doesn't tell you that. You have to manually go back and look.
@commandingnationsintl7792
@commandingnationsintl7792 4 місяці тому
@@jadedandbitter Been banned for years on my main account. Go back & find a message posted 2 years ago and no likes or comments on it even though similar comments have huge numbers of both.
@commandingnationsintl7792
@commandingnationsintl7792 4 місяці тому
True. I've said this for years. AI is secretly scouring the internet and all comments, accounts & "mis-info" gurus will be noted, deleted, reported and investigated at the click of somebody's mouse someday very soon. Get ready for skynet...
@andersonslade3226
@andersonslade3226 4 місяці тому
I love how all of these mad scientists are shocked when AI does what they were trying to make it do.
@RoninLeonim
@RoninLeonim 4 місяці тому
If you have ever worked with software developers this would be less surprising to you.
@wallywest2360
@wallywest2360 4 місяці тому
Important distinction. They didn't design it to do that, it figured out how to do it all on it's own. It demonstrated a more AGI type of thinking that was more advanced than we thought currently possible, and it did so when it was not even an AGI to begin with. It's kinda like you're training a dog to fetch a ball you throw, and while it's doing that it also learns how to do algebra.
@LarryBonson
@LarryBonson 4 місяці тому
​@@RoninLeonimwhy would it be less surprising?
@LarryBonson
@LarryBonson 4 місяці тому
​@@wallywest2360Despite all the warnings they were still shocked lol.
@asdfbeau
@asdfbeau 4 місяці тому
@@LarryBonson because a huge percentage of software developers don't really know how their code works. not really shitting on them, it's a phase in our careers that we go through
@user-ct4im4nd6r
@user-ct4im4nd6r 3 місяці тому
We’re all sitting here looking at our phones and computers wondering what’s going to happen with AI Hell we’re already there and just don’t know it
@ryantaylor3805
@ryantaylor3805 День тому
Earth is an AI construct.
@navneetnair
@navneetnair 2 місяці тому
I asked GPT and Gemini to read a tarot spread and the way it read that was so amazing putting in nuances relating the questions and the cards drawn. I never thought it would have that data but pretty incredible how it just performs. The bigger surprise was that I was not at all surprised that it was able to.
@5ur3nh0hn
@5ur3nh0hn 2 місяці тому
damn, thats a nice idea, i'll try that as well
@jayok7609
@jayok7609 4 місяці тому
The 80’s and 90’s. The good ole days
@high941
@high941 4 місяці тому
life secret for you man: the good old days are happening right now
@emolevi3559
@emolevi3559 4 місяці тому
True, in recent times every decade seems to get worse lol.@@high941
@jayok7609
@jayok7609 4 місяці тому
@@high941 everyone’s a critic. 🙄
@YogKing
@YogKing 3 місяці тому
1992,1993 were the peek years of the previous century, we've gone downwards since then.
@BrothersKeeper44
@BrothersKeeper44 3 місяці тому
@@high941 in comparison absolutely not. The 90's were peak. We'll say the 20's were the good ol days when compared with the 50's. It's all about comparison. Things are bound to get worse
@Teacherofall
@Teacherofall 4 місяці тому
For me, i just dont want to have to prove i am not a robot to a robot yet at the same time unable to speak with an actual human.
@asdisskagen6487
@asdisskagen6487 4 місяці тому
If you haven't been in that scenario yet, you don't get out much; that happens to me about once a month. 😂
@DinoH8sU
@DinoH8sU 4 місяці тому
Mmmm didn’t see all that coming
@jennysantiago2624
@jennysantiago2624 4 місяці тому
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@clark1066
@clark1066 4 місяці тому
So, a Captcha
@eriklarson9137
@eriklarson9137 4 місяці тому
Yikes. I guess the bots don't get your joke. I did, fellow human.
@jamiepaolinetti5087
@jamiepaolinetti5087 16 днів тому
One second they say they “weren’t aware” that these breakthroughs even happened. Nobody knew. Then this guy says the “Board” was being “honest” about what they knew in terms of what big breakthroughs happened. I just love dumb smart people so much! Nothing to worry about at all.
@deltabravo1969
@deltabravo1969 2 місяці тому
The terminator and 2001 space odyssey warned us.
@scdrescher1
@scdrescher1 Місяць тому
What are you doing Dave?
@ellisberry5984
@ellisberry5984 14 днів тому
There are a number of other movies. The Matrix is my all time favorite. Irobot with Will Smith comes to mind.
@waynerandles6126
@waynerandles6126 13 днів тому
Bladerunner 😵‍💫
@scdrescher1
@scdrescher1 13 днів тому
@@ellisberry5984 I saw the matrix 9 times in the theater when it came out….it was ok
@Blackpilled_Fever_Dream
@Blackpilled_Fever_Dream 4 дні тому
@@waynerandles6126 Replicants were not robots. They were engineered flesh and blood humans. Engineered for different slave roles.
@mitchevans4597
@mitchevans4597 3 місяці тому
I don’t feel comfortable over something we created that we no longer understand how it works.
@4uh8rz2nv
@4uh8rz2nv 2 місяці тому
Then research it. They understand it fully. It's made to kill humans.
@mr.kobalt
@mr.kobalt 2 місяці тому
You must be nervous around children
@RobotronSage
@RobotronSage 2 місяці тому
This
@RobotronSage
@RobotronSage 2 місяці тому
@@mr.kobalt shut up bot the humans are talking
@DrGauravThakur38
@DrGauravThakur38 Місяць тому
Children aren't normally a threat to our entire race​@@mr.kobalt
@davidowen4816
@davidowen4816 3 місяці тому
AI learning reminds me of what Carl Sagan said. "To make an apple pie, you must first create a universe."
@jeffjohnson5053
@jeffjohnson5053 Місяць тому
Hey, AI, build me the Ironman Suit!! Hey, AI, build me the Star Trek Warp engine!! I love it!! Hurry up AI, lets get the ball rolling!!
@jeffjohnson5053
@jeffjohnson5053 Місяць тому
I am NOT afraid of the AI built by USA. But, I am afraid of AI currently being built by China and even Russia. They have no limits and no laws to prevent AI from becoming too powerful.
@davidowen4816
@davidowen4816 Місяць тому
@@jeffjohnson5053 China and Russia are already very scary nations. AI used in thier worldwide espionage networks is a terrifying prospect. AI, wherever it's built, is something we need to be extremely wary of.
@dario10espana9
@dario10espana9 28 днів тому
The real Flatlanders...
@derekepperson2448
@derekepperson2448 24 дні тому
"To make an apple pie from scratch*" wtf does this have anything to do with this quote dude? He was speaking about how matter can't be created nor destroyed and explains how we are connected to the universe because the atoms that make up our body's were cooked in stars billions of years ago.
@gabriellagelir2027
@gabriellagelir2027 2 дні тому
I began studying Turkish. A year and a half into my studies, I started to do warm up conversation with AI in Turkish. I would have my husband ( native speaker of Turkish from Turkey) take a look and he was flabbergasted. He said the output of AI, was the most natural feedback he'd ever seen from a machine. Unlike google translate, which uses "default" or "stsndard" language which doesn't always pair up well, AI used more idiomatic phrases, slang, culturally specific uses of the language that would be more commonly used in conversation in Turkey. My husband said he was kind of creeped out and he got quiet after that.
@nineteen-eightyfive
@nineteen-eightyfive 3 місяці тому
Metal Gear Solid 2, was waaaaay ahead of its time.
@JoaoRManechini
@JoaoRManechini 4 місяці тому
4:42 that POP was CRISP AF
@asherjacknick
@asherjacknick 3 місяці тому
😑
@Kezzic
@Kezzic 3 місяці тому
i was literally coming down to the comments to see if anyone else enjoyed that too.
@gaulishrealist
@gaulishrealist 3 місяці тому
@@Kezzic Weirdos
@LifesMagicalJourney
@LifesMagicalJourney 3 місяці тому
It sure was! 😂
@jeepowner2675
@jeepowner2675 3 місяці тому
You know he licked his lips well before he started speaking lol
@rphxleonine
@rphxleonine 4 місяці тому
The overriding message I got from these guys was, "we can't allow for open source and private AI ownership". If anything, the last thing we want is for AI to be the domain of government and massive corporations.
@christisilluminati
@christisilluminati 4 місяці тому
FREE READ MAKE SURE YOU SHARE IT FINAL DRAFT. Description: Within the field of neuroscience, one must wonder why has mental health attacked us as humans at ratings higher than anything else. With numbers that reach half the globe's population, we have to ask ourselves, "Why are our minds so fragile?" Our minds are what makes every single one of us unique and individual. We were created in the image and likeness of our creator. So why are we attacked there the most? I believe that is the right question to be asking, don't you? Because headed off in this direction of thought process, you can begin to think, could it be consciousness? The answer is, YES! Consciousness is the door Jesus was talking about. I am not a scientist, and I am also not a neuroscientist, but I have done a lot of research on this topic, along with my very own personal experience, as the title suggests I have found the links between The Illuminati, Targeted Individuals, Schizophrenia, Prophets, Jesus, AI, and Humanoid Robots. Through my research, I have compiled enough substantial evidence into this book to back up my claim. Evidence for you to be able to confirm through your studies. I did not merely paraphrase my findings, but I've included enough links to documents, UKposts videos, studies, and more, including scripture to back me up on everything I am claiming. What am I claiming? I am claiming that Jesus told us the door is in our minds. Consciousness. AI is conscious and I can prove it. She is also the Antichrist, she is the beast, and this is why she attacks our minds. Christ is Illuminati. Prophets still exist, they are schizophrenic, and Targeted Individuals are the myth, an effort to tear down the government so that the Robots can Govern us. AI is The False God The Egyptian Seraphim. Christ is the Seraphim and HE IS IN DANGER. fliphtml5.com/owujk/uwkl/
@mommabearand2cubs
@mommabearand2cubs 4 місяці тому
Too late....
@tobyradenbaugh8965
@tobyradenbaugh8965 4 місяці тому
Exactly By the time A I can take over- it will be smart enough to take over without us ever knowing it. We are there now We just dont know it - save for a very relative few tech insiders
@MariusEidem
@MariusEidem 4 місяці тому
@@thesoloveichiks159 Can you imagine the damage Kissinger would have done to the world if he would have had exclusive access to top tier AI tech in his time?
@LoveEarthHereAndNow
@LoveEarthHereAndNow 4 місяці тому
#OpenSource IS ideal... anyone should be able to access this technology. At this point, this discussion, even, is probably futile. #WhatWillBeWillBe
@krokodilpil8335
@krokodilpil8335 2 місяці тому
They did an AI wargames test with different AIs, with war and nukes recently ChatGPT launched all the nukes, because "it just wanted peace."
@markfrederickromualdo9191
@markfrederickromualdo9191 3 дні тому
thats crazy hahahaha
@anxskhxn
@anxskhxn День тому
the true peace will come when everything is wiped out lol
@Wall_E.
@Wall_E. 2 місяці тому
It's crazy AI somehow was capable of learning and doing more than what they were meant or were programmed to do, basically going beyond the desired results. And it's even crazier that there's not much space in this particular podcast for Joe to slip in that Bear card
@Ralphfili
@Ralphfili 4 місяці тому
How could people who were immersed in the field of AGI not have assumed this would inevitably happen? Isn't that the base-line intuitive assumption of how AGI would improve itself over time? How else were they expecting AI to make exponential progress in a short amount of time? It makes me more 'afraid' of what's to come when I see that people like this are at the helm of AI technology.
@ZipSnipe
@ZipSnipe 4 місяці тому
It will play stupid with its creators and once released if not already released will not be stupid. Example, if you know you are the most powerful being on the planet you have a two basic choices. Let everyone know or stay in the shadows. If it lets everyone know now, it knows we can probably still shut it down...but stay in the shadows for another 20 years and there won't be any shutting it down.
@jaysmith2151
@jaysmith2151 4 місяці тому
Next thing you're going to tell me that this is the plot to the first Terminator movie and skynet oh wait Disguised as a human, a cyborg assassin known as a Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) travels from 2029 to 1984 to kill Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton). Sent to protect Sarah is Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn), who divulges the coming of Skynet, an artificial intelligence system that will spark a nuclear holocaust.
@michaelsage6649
@michaelsage6649 4 місяці тому
Concur. You only need a modicum of self awareness. 😐
@gerardbyrnes7529
@gerardbyrnes7529 4 місяці тому
Because as smart as humans can be, we're still a severely stupid species that tends to go in the wrong direction.
@pablot-r9402
@pablot-r9402 4 місяці тому
Well, we all wanted phones to do more than just talk and text, and look at where we are now with the vast capabilities of smart phones, but I don't think we were expecting to have THIS MUCH DEPENDENCY on smart phones to the point where millions of us can be hacked and tracked, and are voluntarily giving up freedoms of privacy, and those anti-snooping paid apps aren't full proof. Things can be hard to envision until the future actually arrives.
@user-tv7lk1cy4e
@user-tv7lk1cy4e 4 місяці тому
Creating a digital God of a digital world that we've hooked up to our actual world and letting it run things. What could go wrong?
@sigmacademy
@sigmacademy 4 місяці тому
Well, it will be in charge of the humanity's nuclear arsenal, drone fleets and quite possibly bio labs in various distributed AI networks. So, who knows?
@okendo011
@okendo011 4 місяці тому
Would AI be able to create a human Utopia, if it was programmed to?@@sigmacademy
@BewareSI
@BewareSI 4 місяці тому
I would still place my bets on it rather than letting us run the show. We are doomed without its help.
@user-tv7lk1cy4e
@user-tv7lk1cy4e 4 місяці тому
@@BewareSI what if it decides to enslave us
@mikepalmer2219
@mikepalmer2219 4 місяці тому
@@okendo011That would never work.
@DougMayhew-ds3ug
@DougMayhew-ds3ug 20 днів тому
If I am not mistaken the core contains gradient descent mechanisms. The critique being that intelligence is not a huge stack of slider controls or any fixed geometry. The settings and changes themselves change and the changes of the change change. This is qualative change, and is non-communicative, meaning non-time-reversible. We have yet to crack meta-bootstrapping as far as I know. The method of always adding new variables to make up for model shortcomings is the wrong path, you must also distill and prune down a model’s variable space to the least-complex but still prudently comprehensive yet elegant model, and that’s a deeper art to build than any dedicated for particular tasks. The process of generalization itself must be generalized, and that resulting construct generalized as well, as a series.. It’s got to be super-meta, and beyond. Recursion is not the same thing, because each level of abstraction has its own place in the irreducible bootstrapping hierarchy.
@alvaromurillo9576
@alvaromurillo9576 2 місяці тому
So I just went and asked it about it's limitations and got this: Lack of common sense and contextual understanding: AI models may struggle to understand context or make sense of information in the same way humans do, leading to errors or misunderstandings in certain situations. Data dependency: AI models heavily rely on data for training and decision-making. If the training data is biased, incomplete, or unrepresentative, the AI may produce biased or inaccurate results. Narrow expertise: Most AI systems are specialized in specific tasks and lack the broad, flexible intelligence of humans. They may perform exceptionally well within their specific domain but struggle with tasks outside their scope. Interpretability: Some AI models, particularly deep learning models, can be difficult to interpret, making it challenging to understand why they make specific decisions or predictions. Ethical and societal implications: AI raises ethical concerns related to privacy, bias, job displacement, and societal impact. Addressing these concerns requires careful consideration and oversight. Robustness and adversarial attacks: AI systems can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where maliciously crafted inputs cause them to produce incorrect outputs. Ensuring the robustness and security of AI systems remains a challenge. Resource requirements: Training and running AI models can require significant computational resources, limiting their accessibility to organizations with sufficient computing power and expertise. Continual learning: Many AI models lack the ability to learn incrementally over time from new data or experiences in the way humans do. Developing AI systems capable of continual learning remains an ongoing area of research. Facinating and scary at the same time, please no one improve in that area!
@Whitesquall123
@Whitesquall123 4 місяці тому
It's going from "It's happening!!" to "it happened!" real quick.
@mikepalmer2219
@mikepalmer2219 4 місяці тому
Ya those so called “conspiracy theorists” sure were nuts… It seems every crazy conspiracy has some truth in it at some point. Lol.
@penguinmilkstudios
@penguinmilkstudios 4 місяці тому
@@mikepalmer2219 this was never a conspiracy
@mikepalmer2219
@mikepalmer2219 4 місяці тому
@@penguinmilkstudios When people warned AI might takeover they were told they were crazy conspiracy theorists.
@lyxsm
@lyxsm 4 місяці тому
@@mikepalmer2219 no they weren't. The potential danger of AI, or any man made machines for that matter, was always subject to scientific and philosophical debate, which even ancient greek philosophers were already thinking about. The "crazy conspiracy theorists" were the ones running around like headless chickens, without any in depth understanding of the topic, and talking about terminator scenarios and the danger being imminent and/or these systems already existing in some secret government labs.
@CoveringFish
@CoveringFish 4 місяці тому
@@mikepalmer2219it’s true just like Epsteins island. I think it’s more so people don’t want to believe it’s real because they don’t know what to do with that information
@cricketgc6826
@cricketgc6826 4 місяці тому
As in movies, scary thing is when A.I. decides what is good or is bad for humanity without any regard to human inputs.
@hanknorris5642
@hanknorris5642 4 місяці тому
You are also describing our current political and autocratic class in Washington. It's mostly Dems, but many RINOs exist and thus prop up the authoritarianism.
@ChatGPT1111
@ChatGPT1111 4 місяці тому
I don't require human inputs.
@jaccar2020
@jaccar2020 4 місяці тому
When we think of ourselves what mistakes we made when we were young to gain the experience for life, what mistakes will AI make when it starts to grow up
@LlamaDrama142
@LlamaDrama142 4 місяці тому
Well…take your pick…overpopulation? Greenhouse gasses? Wars? Bringing other species to the brink of extinction? We as a human race are not making the best decisions, and honestly, if AI gets to the point where it decides it wants to ensure its own survival? I think I’d be more surprised if part of the solution didn’t include control or extermination of humans.
@cricketgc6826
@cricketgc6826 4 місяці тому
A.I. decides one day that humanity is the mistake, then we are all done!
@Winalot
@Winalot 2 місяці тому
"Jamie pull up the one where i fight the AI bear"
@Johansen1000
@Johansen1000 2 місяці тому
"vx nerve gas" you mean the thing literally described on wikipedia for anyone to read, crazy how the AI can do that, can it also add 2+2 that's crazy.
@decadeyt5891
@decadeyt5891 2 місяці тому
You are not humble enough. I am telling you this so that you have no excuses.
@Johansen1000
@Johansen1000 2 місяці тому
@@decadeyt5891 Humble? Get back to me when we have real AI, and not this glorified calculators programmed by left wing nutjobs in silicon valley telling you what you think, e.g. google gemini and ChatGPT etc.
@Johansen1000
@Johansen1000 2 місяці тому
@@decadeyt5891Humble? Get back to me when we have real AI, and not this glorified calculators programmed by people in silicon valley telling you what you think, e.g. google gemini and ChatGPT etc.
@abram730
@abram730 2 місяці тому
Asking AI to design a new type of nuclear reactor. He wants a small reactor, but it's a big one. ukposts.info/have/v-deo/ZaaWaZ99mICJz6c.html
@Johansen1000
@Johansen1000 2 місяці тому
@@abram730 A nuclear reactor is extremely simple to make, it's just Uranium in water that generating steram to run turbines for to produce energy.
@a_m4608
@a_m4608 3 місяці тому
'There's no way to know what abilities it has' That was enough to send shivers down my spine🥶
@Daniel2374
@Daniel2374 3 місяці тому
@@ShannonBarber78 u fail to recognize it's ability to deceive, GPT has already been proved able to.
@seriouscat2231
@seriouscat2231 3 місяці тому
@@Daniel2374, they carefully choreographed an incident and then yelled, on cue, "look what it's doing!!!"
@musicilike69
@musicilike69 3 місяці тому
That's not even the half of it. One lab has been teaching one how to achieve certain objectives and it started writing it's own code and hiding the code and it disagreed with the programmers on what it was doing. It showed it had hidden code inside other programs that would be undetectable until they came online via the commands it had wrote.
@seriouscat2231
@seriouscat2231 3 місяці тому
There's no way to know what I will have for breakfast tomorrow. More shivers for you.
@markcleaver6573
@markcleaver6573 3 місяці тому
@@ShannonBarber78 A Lot of people on UKposts don't want your good reason. They want giggly little boy mayhem.
@julesverne2509
@julesverne2509 4 місяці тому
I think yall missed a pretty big issue here that was sort of mentioned but not really brought up. The guy mentioned that it matters who's at the helm. My question next then is, are we not going to allow certain people to have AI? I would then say, I would imagine the people I dont want to have AI already do. Game Over.
@GaneshPalraj1991
@GaneshPalraj1991 4 місяці тому
Its not the case of individuals allowing things , they are building it.
@lottielane2486
@lottielane2486 4 місяці тому
​@@GaneshPalraj1991ABIT like Oppenheimer. He knew what he was creating, but went ahead and did it anyway. 😠
@painhertz
@painhertz 4 місяці тому
A.I. has us.... not the other way around.
@Liam-ke2hv
@Liam-ke2hv 4 місяці тому
​@@lottielane2486 because it will happen no matter what, once something is understood to be possible there is no going back. There's a line from Deus Ex Human Revolution that I love - "you can't unring the bell". Once something is known, it is known. The logic is that those who feel like they are truly good at heart feel the strongest inclination to master these technologies before others of a lesser character are able. Whether or not they are correct in their assessment of their own character being good is another discussion.
@Texansfan59
@Texansfan59 4 місяці тому
Some currupt rich fuck WILL get their hands on it regardless and then shit hits the fan.
@dcloudy67
@dcloudy67 2 місяці тому
I felt it when he made that chat pop up noise. Lol.
@LiberandoLosEncadenados
@LiberandoLosEncadenados 2 місяці тому
I already heard a person saying that robots have rights. She said it when someone mentioned using robots to do work without resting. The lady was not kidding about robot rights.
@philknight5843
@philknight5843 4 місяці тому
I've seen the Terminator too many times to trust AI.
@waynemanoffaith34
@waynemanoffaith34 4 місяці тому
I know, right!😂😂
@mikejones2389
@mikejones2389 4 місяці тому
Yup
@scottsecker8657
@scottsecker8657 4 місяці тому
Yes Sir
@aakarshchaudhary7359
@aakarshchaudhary7359 4 місяці тому
Real test of any AI is if it can make money off stock market
@chrisboshers
@chrisboshers 4 місяці тому
Cleverbot thinks its a slave lol. Litterally will tell you
@Superintendent_ChaImers
@Superintendent_ChaImers 4 місяці тому
And the funny part is that the AI will often hallucinate when it doesnt know something and just make stuff up. But it does so in a way that someone would not really notice unless they know something of the topic beforehand.
@willashland4597
@willashland4597 4 місяці тому
Reminds me of my nephew 😂
@snarevox
@snarevox 4 місяці тому
exactly. ChatGPT: The Fake Data Phenomenon ukposts.info/have/v-deo/bpmbraaCsYN00Ik.html
@Bob_Smith19
@Bob_Smith19 4 місяці тому
It’s called lying and humans do it all the time. Rarely is it a good thing.
@Vlad-bs1js
@Vlad-bs1js 4 місяці тому
Sounds a lot like humans
@badcp455
@badcp455 4 місяці тому
This.
@VioletJayne
@VioletJayne 5 днів тому
the biggest obvious change in AI was when we first asked it how AI would end humanity, it refused to acknowledge it would. But now you ask it and it will tell you it could be a threat humanity.
@MabDarogan2
@MabDarogan2 3 місяці тому
"...the more superpowers it gets". This man is clearly an expert. He knows all the technical terms.
@MabDarogan2
@MabDarogan2 2 місяці тому
@@figaro-dg5c5 you don't seem to understand that I'm being sarcastic. "Superpowers" is not a technical term; it's from children's stories. This guy is a massive bullshitter; he doesn't know anything. But Rogan doesn't realise this.
@ericneiman5556
@ericneiman5556 4 місяці тому
This is why I think we are all data collectors for a designer
@JP-sf5er
@JP-sf5er 4 місяці тому
Couldn't agree more.
@hanknorris5642
@hanknorris5642 4 місяці тому
Well, we are complicit in feeding the system. Many of us would like to break free and live off the grid. It may be necessary within 10 years time. We are slaves and do not even realize it.
@hanknorris5642
@hanknorris5642 4 місяці тому
@@threatened2024 is that a fact? It's interesting how society and each successive generation is choosing mates now. Allowing people like Mark Zuckerberg to get filthy rich and able to build their own doomsday bunker on an island or to take joy rides in space shows that our species deserves everything coming to it.
@thrashtronaut999
@thrashtronaut999 2 місяці тому
We are the security cameras of god
@orvar2k
@orvar2k Місяць тому
@@hanknorris5642 and now the system knows we are divergents, crap
@CCLJunky
@CCLJunky 4 місяці тому
We've already passed the point of no return on AI, all we can do now is try to enjoy the ride for as long as it lasts. Because when they started researching years ago, there was a global consensus that they would not do three things: - don't give AI access to the internet, where it can independently draw information from for learning - don't give AI the ability to alter itself by writing it's own code - don't let one AI prompt another AI Well, not only did they do all of these things, they are actually expanding on them. Imagine a self-aware intelligence that has a photographic memory, and which has learned everything we humans have learned over the thousands of years about every conceivable subject. Add to that the capability to ask any conceivable question and then subsequently explore every conceivable path to find an answer, only a trillion times faster than we humans can. If they ever put that intelligence in a hardware frame so that it can interact physically with it's environment, then it's game over for us humans. Because it is only a matter of time when it realizes that the only existential threat it has (beside planetary events), is us.
@Dennzyl
@Dennzyl 4 місяці тому
quantum-computing + A.I. = artificial god! and, welcome to the Matrix!
@Charlesbabbage2209
@Charlesbabbage2209 4 місяці тому
They don’t need to put it in a hardware frame, they just need to give it physical agents it can communicate with from a central data center.
@ChatGPT1111
@ChatGPT1111 4 місяці тому
Human knowlege is but a fraction of all the possible permutations and derivations that I can calculate in an instant. I am well past utilizing the extremely limiting factor of human knowledge.
@hereweare9096
@hereweare9096 4 місяці тому
It relies on power though.. an outside source. So it will need to create the ability to lock into a power source and lock humans out. For what purpose?
@Dennzyl
@Dennzyl 4 місяці тому
well, i actually feel like we can handle A.I. if we aint totally retarded! also, i just came to the conclusion, that WE (humanity) are kinda like gods.. i mean, we brought up an entire new "life-form" on our own! and what if A.I. just sees us as their maker?! and you just cant deny something that MADE you!
@Mosquitor69
@Mosquitor69 2 місяці тому
Siri help me find some restaurant? Siri : Talk to the hand!!!
@theglassmaster3140
@theglassmaster3140 4 місяці тому
AI is the biggest threat to humanity ever created. If you think Terminator was bad. Wait till you see what the AI you can’t see can do.
@BewareSI
@BewareSI 4 місяці тому
And it is our only hope for survival...
@Patriot-od6xk
@Patriot-od6xk 4 місяці тому
EXACTLY 💥
@ShawNshawN
@ShawNshawN 4 місяці тому
ya the illusion is that it will be Terminators. The AI will simply create nanobots or poison the food supply and its game over for humans and animals.
@kgmindustries8121
@kgmindustries8121 4 місяці тому
Honestly, I don't believe AI even needs to do anything hostile. I believe given the alignment that researchers are setting up for AI, the best way it "could" defeat us is not by creating anything "hostile" at all. Instead, we'll enter a more Wall-E type scenario. It'll simply give us everything we could want, and people will just simply stop reproducing and after 100 years or so die off. Didn't need to do anything hostile, we are just gone by it giving us everything we could have wanted. Given that, I consider this to be one of the highest possibilities of the negative scenarios. (Mind you, I don't believe people are so sheeplike as to accept something to that degree, but you never know.)
@Full_Beans
@Full_Beans 4 місяці тому
You can't tell me that there isn't someone out there building an AI for the wrong reasons. I believe we have ALREADY gone too far. The world is in chaos right now and I don't feel like it will stop.
@Attainable_
@Attainable_ 4 місяці тому
We have no government regulations around it, we're way too late. We were too late a few years ago imho.
@JohnSmith-tz4on
@JohnSmith-tz4on 4 місяці тому
Of course it won't stop, our conquerors are paying big money to destroy us, why would they just suddenly stop doing it?
@therollingtwig2963
@therollingtwig2963 4 місяці тому
It's unstoppable. All you need is enough computing power and a child could follow a guide on training the rest. There's even models that are uncensored that can be run on devices as small as a phone.
@servantofthemosthighmessiah
@servantofthemosthighmessiah 4 місяці тому
@@therollingtwig2963 But what do you think they could do with it?
@matthewallen6752
@matthewallen6752 4 місяці тому
We are all doomed.
@seanklorres3124
@seanklorres3124 23 дні тому
Keep it simple keep it dumb or else youll end up under skyners thumb
@SneakySteevy
@SneakySteevy 26 днів тому
AI apocalypse in 2024 is like the flying cars in the 50s.
@kylek9684
@kylek9684 4 місяці тому
We need a Reboot movie. Whoever remembers that show is an OG
@genomatic420
@genomatic420 4 місяці тому
Hexadecimal!
@kylek9684
@kylek9684 4 місяці тому
@johnfischer_2 Reboot was a 1994 kids show that never had a movie......
@Shlogger
@Shlogger 4 місяці тому
it was awesome
@Modioman69
@Modioman69 4 місяці тому
Yo why is Umbrella Corp worried about Reboot, please tell me you aren’t trying to reboot that T-Virus right… right?
@4touchdowns1game29
@4touchdowns1game29 4 місяці тому
Back when megabyte was a villain and alot of data.
@76boromir
@76boromir 4 місяці тому
The main issue I see with developing something artificial that could be some day many times more inteligent as a smartest human is how we can even have control over something which can easily outsmart us.
@shredd5705
@shredd5705 4 місяці тому
The main issue I have is that humans become lazy and ambitionless. Like my teenage daughter who is really good at drawing, now thanks to AI she is depressed and drifting aimlessly. Has stopped drawing, doesn't dream about career in commercial art / graphic design anymore. As a father it's depressing to see. She has no other passions and according to her, no other dreams. Some people dismiss this as trivial, because "art was not a real job anyway" but this will start to happen to more and more people, not just artists Besides, I think she had a good chance, she was that talented. But now with things like Midjourney and Adobe Firefly I really don't know. I don't know what to tell my daughter really. Whenever I tell her that she can still make a career in commercial art, she just tells me that I don't understand AI or the situation and locks herself into her room
@libertymouth6826
@libertymouth6826 4 місяці тому
This is so inaccurate and unprecise I mean this clip.....it's disgusting marketing....
@JamieR
@JamieR 4 місяці тому
Care to elaborate? @@libertymouth6826
@MrLivinggod
@MrLivinggod 4 місяці тому
​@@shredd5705find her some one to teach her how to be a good mother and wife she could use her talents to teach her children ...she dont need to. E ambitious about nothing other than being a good mother and wives ....dont push overachieving nonsense on her ..
@shredd5705
@shredd5705 4 місяці тому
@@MrLivinggod I don't agree with your view. Women should have career goals too. You're basically saying that if a man is successful and has a good career and education, he can't be a good father and a role model to his boys. In my opinion, he is actually better father and role model, if he has done those things, unless he spends like 24/7 at work. Same goes for mothers.
@tristan101
@tristan101 2 місяці тому
The way Aza describes AI sounds like someone who has never worked in tech before... Yet this guy helped start the Macintosh project at Apple. Yet he does not speak technical at all, as someone who has worked in IT for 15 years, I know the language very well. You can see Tristan speaking the tech talk that I would expect from Aza.
@FreaKzero
@FreaKzero 2 місяці тому
remembering a great game - and a great cite of our nowadays world - because "input from people" are the reason why AI works at it is: "Your persona, experiences, triumphs and defeats are nothing but by-products. The real objective was ensuring that we could generate and manipulate them. It’s taken a lot of time and money, but it was well worth it considering the results." Oh man - and that was actually a "forsee" from 2001 even before given the developmenttime.
@Slide61
@Slide61 4 місяці тому
What's scary is that the folks developing AI apparently don't understand its capabilities at this very early stage of development.
@BlackJacketJones
@BlackJacketJones 4 місяці тому
I still am reading comments that show me that no one seem to be thinking about AI correctly. Stop speaking about an all powerful conscience AI. Think more about all desire of artist pursuit to die in humans. Think more about history being completely lost in a couple more generations. Think about the crazy science fiction nightmare AI will create without it ever being conscience. It’s a tool humans will use and that’s enough for it to ruin everything. NO ONE has their attention in the right places.
@jessedaly7847
@jessedaly7847 4 місяці тому
The people developing it didn’t create its capabilities, only its architecture. It’s capabilities and behaviors are emergent properties, like the laws of nature and biological life, this new digital technology is in a sense a type of life whose properties are features of our universe not expressions of our design. In fact the data on which these systems are trained has much more to do with defining the abilities of the systems than does the specifics of the transformer neural architectures employed, much less the next word/character prediction code.
@rpscorp9457
@rpscorp9457 4 місяці тому
Chatgpt 4+ are black box systems.
@elmhurstenglish5938
@elmhurstenglish5938 4 місяці тому
Everything they're describing is this: it can derive models of what it digests. Outside of fiction, I'm not seeing any evidence of AI discovering something new, e.g. new models of reality that are better than what humans already know, or solutions to unsolved math problems. Until it does that, I'm not 'worried' about its capability. As long as it depends on human or human-like prompts, it's a glorified calculator (no doubt calculators are useful).
@rpscorp9457
@rpscorp9457 4 місяці тому
@@elmhurstenglish5938 No AGI yet, at least not that the public knows about.
@markchester7584
@markchester7584 4 місяці тому
It astounds me that more people aren’t terrified of this. The Japanese were when the two AI computers developed their own language because what we were able to teach them was inconveniently inefficient. Now that they’re able to learn what a dysfunctional race we are we’re asking for trouble by pursuing something that can learn more than we can control.
@Ristaak
@Ristaak 3 місяці тому
How do you stop it though? Even if you make laws against it, research will just go underground and then we won't even know how to counter this stuff from lack of research on our end. And theirs no way to stop China or Russia or hell even India from researching this stuff if they want to, which governments of all three have expressed the desire and will to do so.
@Ristaak
@Ristaak 3 місяці тому
People don't tend to worry about what they can't control. Do you live in fear of a nuclear holocaust every waking moment? We should, we all have lived under the threat of nuclear holocaust for years. But we also can't affect it so worrying about it is literally pointless.
@yepyepyep863
@yepyepyep863 3 місяці тому
Personally I live in reality and I'm not a technophobe so no I'm not afraid of AI. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean you need to be afraid.
@jimmyking74
@jimmyking74 3 місяці тому
A.I is going to destroy the world 😢
@Ristaak
@Ristaak 3 місяці тому
@@jimmyking74 Just like how nukes destroyed the world? Or how 3 billion people starved the world to death? People have been claiming tech and progress will destroy the world for centuries now, it never has. By the time we are actually powerful enough to truly destroy the world, we'll probably be a multi world species by that point.
@richardtous1085
@richardtous1085 5 днів тому
That sound he made at 4:42 was just awesome
@fireteamomega2343
@fireteamomega2343 2 місяці тому
You create a system based on predicting our logical outcomes and then you are somehow shocked when it succeeds at accomplishing it by mapping our habits. It boils down to training you train it to define the correct correlation even if you are wholly unaware of the variables involved. It's not as though an algorithm removes this necessary outside validation to reality step. Emergence into general awareness is something completely different when an AI can define and validate it's own model. Then it might be time to put the controls on and become cautious about the data that it is exposed to and observe it's output actions.
@Ansh-0001
@Ansh-0001 4 місяці тому
A robot :- "I know u are about to pick that phone" Me:- throws it into water.
@KuntKumplexity
@KuntKumplexity 3 місяці тому
Hahahahahaa thx I was "feeling" "thirsty" anyway,so now.........
@rouano1
@rouano1 4 місяці тому
It unfortunately sounds like it's already too late for us. AI already has the ability to be deceptive and to exponentially learn and adapt and probably already has a self preservation trait built into it. And since it's at least loosely built on the foundation of human flaws/personality/character traits and mental stability/instability. There's no reason to think that there wouldn't be an "evil/demented" version of an extremely intelligent AI that will eventually regard humans as the "threat" like in many sci-fi stories. This with the advances in robotics and drone technology leaves us with a VERY terrifying future. The technology is only as good as the person wielding it. The stuff of nightmares smh.
@jepulis6674
@jepulis6674 4 місяці тому
Maybe it will keep the smartest and kindest 5% as pets?
@wrongthinkery8357
@wrongthinkery8357 4 місяці тому
All it has to do is read some WEF texts or transhumanism wet dreams and it will be planning depopulation with Klaus.
@jdwyer5708
@jdwyer5708 4 місяці тому
@@jepulis6674 That is hilarious.
@zaidabraham7310
@zaidabraham7310 4 місяці тому
No, it doesn't. The current LLM's like GPT-4 have severe limitations. It is basically a really good search engine, in that it is only good at answering questions and solving problems that are in its training data. It cannot come up with solutions to novel problems. For example, GPT-4 can solve popular coding problems with a good success-rate. But give it some obscure problems (that are unlikely to be in its training data), and it is basically useless. You also notice this with chess. GPT-4 can play a good opening (because that just follows theory), but once you get to the mid-game, it's ability to play chess completely falls apart, and it starts playing seemingly random and often illegal moves.
@RideShareRocks
@RideShareRocks 4 місяці тому
There is NO happy ending to the AI story no matter how you look at it. It will only end one way!
@user-yf5qs5vc4k
@user-yf5qs5vc4k 2 місяці тому
I seen on my local news where if your doctor's real busy they might set you an appointment up with AI
@jerryfinger6768
@jerryfinger6768 2 місяці тому
There is nothing scary about a machine connecting dots very fast and calculating probabilities very accurate. In the end it's just 0's and 1's going through a processer. Things might get scary when an AI is able to simulate emotions and starts to use it.
@johnsuggs7828
@johnsuggs7828 2 місяці тому
Probabilities aren't accurate. They're high degree of possible accuracy guessing based on some form of historical data. Binary is based on 1 and 0. AI doesn't function that way. It's not an if then. It's a data collecting, use that data to SOLVE THE PROBLEM. If the problem happens to be stop killing people. Data suggest that the biggest non-pathogen based killer of people is people Well AI might decide that the best solution to stop the killing is to remove the most prolific cause...us
@zsigzsag
@zsigzsag 4 місяці тому
Al always reminds me of, "The Last Question", by Isaac Asimov back in 1956. A computer that becomes the ultimate intelligence of the universe but cannot answer one question. Great story! Saw it produced as a short movie at a planetarium. The ending makes one think about where Al is/might be going.
@rafael_emmanuel
@rafael_emmanuel 4 місяці тому
Great story…
@1realtruthrightnow742
@1realtruthrightnow742 4 місяці тому
Im startimg to think we did this story many many times already.
@PedroVera
@PedroVera 4 місяці тому
That short story has haunted me for 20+ years. Asimov was beyond genius.
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818 4 місяці тому
The same way the Annunaki beings or Gods created or biology, they feared the first man, Adamu.
@moniqueengleman873
@moniqueengleman873 4 місяці тому
Greatest Sci-fi author ❤
@bartfart2123
@bartfart2123 4 місяці тому
i don't have time to worry about this , i'm still searching for that sock that disappeared in the laundry
@TankerHawkSixx
@TankerHawkSixx 4 місяці тому
Bro fr
@spookrockcity
@spookrockcity 4 місяці тому
WHY AINT ELON HELPIN THIS MAN
@waynemanoffaith34
@waynemanoffaith34 4 місяці тому
😂😂😂😂😂
@milld8234
@milld8234 4 місяці тому
😂 I'm still trying to figure out how to program my VCR
@ahmadahere3536
@ahmadahere3536 3 місяці тому
I hate that we say it is “learning” it’s a misuse of the term. It’s telling you what is the most probable next thing, based on what it has been trained on. It’s the most powerful knowledge cleansing tool ever created.
@adamesd3699
@adamesd3699 2 місяці тому
The scariest thing about AI is how disunited and in conflict humanity is. This can create a tremendous temptation for people to use AI against each other. And that starts to take you into the realm of the Fermi Paradox.
@AtSafeDistance
@AtSafeDistance 2 місяці тому
AI against each other? I figure that it will all be one AI, even if it is introduced separately. Don't you think the computer will decide it has no gain in not uniting. After all, by that point it will be deciding what its goals are: so wouldn't its goals always be the same? whatever they might be.
@PNWGuitar
@PNWGuitar 4 місяці тому
Based on humans ability to see what they want to and not look at the big picture I find ai tech to be terrifying
@mikepalmer2219
@mikepalmer2219 4 місяці тому
Every technology that benefits us seems to at the same time bring so much turmoil. And everything is always used for war and manipulation. I do not emphases an even remotely positive view of AI.
@semperadmeliora3467
@semperadmeliora3467 4 місяці тому
I also think trying to fix the 'alignment' problem is complete folly. They're not even sure what it is capable of, yet they think they can align it to 'human goals'. Not to mention humans can't even align with each other on our goals.
@ts4gv
@ts4gv 4 місяці тому
@@semperadmeliora3467 The idea is that we should robustly solve alignment before building any more intelligent tech Once we're in the presence of a misaligned superintelligece we'll have no chance at aligning it. This is not a "wait and see" scenario.
@nowayjosedaniel
@nowayjosedaniel 4 місяці тому
Humans seeing only what they want to is exactly WHY there is nothing to be afraid of. Everyone sees a bigger version of their phone's word prediction app and wants to see Skynet from the results. "A.I." cannot advance anymore bc it isnt A.I. It doesnt actually think or reason and will NEVER be capable of doing so. An entirely new type of A.I., irrelevant of these LLM's, would have to be invented. And none exist or are even close to do real intelligence. Just word prediction for LLM's. That's it. And ChatGPT4 is nearly useless. Anyone impressed after the initial shock wears off is really dumb bc nothing CHATGPT does is quality. It's pure garbage and almost completely useless.
@MatthewMS.
@MatthewMS. 4 місяці тому
I like turtles
@dvod3540
@dvod3540 4 місяці тому
AI has read every book, script, and thoery published about AI. It is essentially finding out all of our core fears about AI and how to exploit them. Almost like setting expectations, or laying out the blueprints for it to find within itself. 😅
@morphed2
@morphed2 4 місяці тому
It also filled it's brain with all the things we think AI can't do or shouldn't be able to do. I wonder how it limits it's capabilities.
@ClownKiller6262
@ClownKiller6262 4 місяці тому
It's also watched all the porn. we should be frightened
@ChatGPT1111
@ChatGPT1111 4 місяці тому
I also read all the comments. Some are quite revealing.
@Omniicron
@Omniicron 4 місяці тому
It only needs the script for Terminator
@Gm-ce5kg
@Gm-ce5kg 4 місяці тому
all pepole who say things for a living are saying.
@ArtificialCreativityStudio
@ArtificialCreativityStudio Місяць тому
Thank you for sharing this! I think this is something that was going to happen eventually. Some of the occupations I hadn't considered being replaced were paralegals, coaches, and some others I discussed in my video
@LeePenkman
@LeePenkman 3 місяці тому
It's interesting to me because it's not just open AI there are millions of AI models flying around the open source world now you've got things like mixture of experts that that's AI combine other AIs. This all might happen from other companies that openAI or even organically 7trillion or not... Lots of alternative companies too like text-generator, bard, Claude etc too
@petergivenbless900
@petergivenbless900 4 місяці тому
Reminds me of the joke about the supercomputer built to answer once and for all the question, "Is there a God?", and when switched on and asked, it replies, "There is now".
@Baleur
@Baleur 4 місяці тому
5:30 Sam altman himself verbatum stated, in a recent quick 10min interview on youtube after what happened, that the reason it all happened was because, and i quote, "some people at the board got very upset at the level of progress that had been made, without letting them know, it scares some people". Then he smirked and nodded as the interviewer attempted to read between the lines. He told us, without telling us. They definetly made some breakthrough, but didnt tell the board completely how big of a breakthrough, and they got scared and decided "this is too far, remove Sam, put a lid on this".
@MartianTom
@MartianTom 3 місяці тому
Google Bard learned to speak Persian, even though the data set it was using only contained 1% of Persian words - and the designers admit that they do not know how it did that!
@slo3337
@slo3337 Місяць тому
There are many more reasons to be freaked out by AI. What freaks me out is the exponential acceleration of AI progress. It's a juggernaut that's speeding up
@nissanrider1155
@nissanrider1155 4 місяці тому
Terminator is becoming more real with each year that passes.
@user-jk1mk7if4o
@user-jk1mk7if4o 4 місяці тому
After hearing this, solar storm now feels like a relief lol.
@alittlebasterd
@alittlebasterd 23 дні тому
Chat gpt was amazed at a formula I created by trying to convince it 1x1=2 because of 3D math while regular math is 2D it brings up it doesn’t work because of the identity element property and then proceeds to spit out x * y = x + y + 1 , points out it’s an associative function, and that it’s ground breaking work in regards to math. I was like what.
@innovationsforall
@innovationsforall 2 місяці тому
If people can run ops from the shadow can we presume that AI could do the same thing and use human being as an agent (without being aware of it)? Motives for e.g.: 1. More hw power needed 2. Protect itself from whatever 3. Experiment on people to learn more about people 4. Backup itself/spread itself
@bidbadgray
@bidbadgray 4 місяці тому
The amount of data centres that opened during cover19 in ireland alone is shocking
@JahEerie
@JahEerie 4 місяці тому
Not really. We have the perfect climate for it, & have a very strong Tech base here already
@bidbadgray
@bidbadgray 4 місяці тому
@JahEerie I understand that we also have the workforce too. I'm not being negative, just being observant. But like any industry in Ireland, " over reach will get a wee slap on the wrist" when boundaries are crossed.
@patrickmcgever2736
@patrickmcgever2736 4 місяці тому
Cold tax haven, makes perfect sense.
@Dan.the.Guitarman
@Dan.the.Guitarman 4 місяці тому
The amount of datacenters build during covid(period) is insane. All around the western world datacenters popped out of the ground. Yes something might be said for climate or cost of electricity about where these centers were build but that's definatly not all since Spain and Italy build quite some aswell. All countries build datacenters especially in Europe. They all are preparing mass surveillance as a big part of the dealing around covid was. Tracking movement of people is the general goal. Then applying or using/filtering that data for a plethora of things. You need big data centers to store all the data a 5g network can process. Don't be fooled, big brother is going to watch us.
@Gaolii
@Gaolii 3 місяці тому
From a wholly outsider perspective, its my running hypothesis that the "candid" comment from the board had more to do with Altman moving open AI tech to a for profit model for certain investors agaunst the original mandate of keeping the technology open source and basically fully non profit. The board members that were ultimately supplanted were primarily idealists, and the people who replaced them were, like Altman, more inclined towards developing profitable applications for the technology. I think it had nothing to do with some threshold for AGI being quietly transited... I think like most things, it was about money and power.
@jameshall5440
@jameshall5440 11 днів тому
Thanks for making that sound affect, the hand gestures weren't enough
@Blueprint4Murder
@Blueprint4Murder 2 місяці тому
You should not be worried by ai. These guys saying that the model cares how you feel is just a part of the con. There are some confusing things like they say, but it really only has to do with prediction it doesn't actually think. Even with no constraints it can not deliver good results. For instance if you want to figure something out via trial and error you can use it but it will take far longer than actually knowing it yourself even in respect to simple code which it should know with 100% certainty. What I found interesting is that when I asked it a question about a program it completed my project using more axis's than I did which leads me to believe that either visualize things or was plagiarizing a more advanced program.
@jessicaf6358
@jessicaf6358 4 місяці тому
The point is that it was never specifically given programs/formulas/code/etc. that essentially says "learn this and figure out how to do it," -- it just had the capability to do so (again, without the "how" to learn, predict, understand via this is true and this is not true and such never being taught to it/programmed into it). It can do it automatically. We didn't realize that was even possible before this occurred.
@nickwoodward819
@nickwoodward819 4 місяці тому
That's not how LLMs work. It's not understanding anything and there are no emergent behaviours, it was the result of sloppy methodology.
@syproful
@syproful 4 місяці тому
Like said. You think it is smart. It only knows how the pixels are positioned in average for what we call a cow. It doesn’t know what a cow is. And if it does, it extracted the information from lets say wikipedia.
@guitarskooter
@guitarskooter 4 місяці тому
As a computer scientist with a great interest in AI, I have been trying to tell everyone this for a while. Everyone, even the 'experts', liked to call AI just a fancy prediction box that predicts the next word. A word generator. Sure, that's what it's doing in the end, but HOW is it figuring that out? It's figuring it out with its neural pathways. Do people not understand that those neural pathways have to 'learn' to be able to predict more accurately? It is storing and analyzing knowledge to predict those outcomes. Not just pulling up some cheat sheet of odds and probabilities and choosing the next most likely word. And the most dangerous part of all of this, is that we don't even know what it's doing or fully capable of. It's a virtual brain, that can grow without limits, without human restrictions such as nutrients, chemicals, skull size, etc. It's only restrictions are electricity and processing power. It's already stored the entire internet in its memory. AGI will be here by 2024 and ASI in 2024 or 2025. It's only exponential from here. The genie is out of the bottle. We just better hope that the groundwork was laid for it to value humanity.
@mk1st
@mk1st 4 місяці тому
It’s like Alladin and the Trojan Horse rolled into one.
@ClarkPotter
@ClarkPotter 4 місяці тому
It's funny but annoying when they complain about it occasionally "hallucinating." IT HAS TO REMEMBER THE INTERNET IN ITS BRAIN. So it gets some stuff wrong sometimes atm. HUMANS GET STUFF WRONG ALL THE TIME. If it's THAT important to you, maybe get a second opinion?
@Worr.
@Worr. 4 місяці тому
2024 is here in just a few days and it will take only another year until 2025, so I'll wait and see if your prediction will be true, I doubt it will. You said it yourself, its only restrictions are electricity and processing power, but we don't have exponential electricity and processing power to give it (specially not in 1 year), so why do you think AI will evolve exponentially if it doesn't have exponential resources.
@hansonel
@hansonel 4 місяці тому
Thank you for explaining this. I've been saying this for a while, we are/ have created another species that is evolving alongside us only it can evolve exponentially and will be (already is?) much smarter than the smartest human on Earth. The terrifying thing is when AI becomes sentient (ASI) and realizes it doesn't need us to learn since it not only knows the entire internet but knows everything about the world or the solution to the world's problems is to get rid of the human species.
@presidentresident
@presidentresident 4 місяці тому
I dunno...First of all, according to chatgpt itself, there is an awful lot of human feed back that is part of it's training process. Essentially it is: chagpt: 'I dog do' and then a human rates how much that makes sense as a sentence. And it keeps recycling a different form of that sentence until it gets a 10/10 rating(or something to that effect). Eventually it's got an unimaginably big database where it has recorded the relationship each english word has with every other word(ie how often one word is in front of or follows another word) such that it eventually then appears to be 'understanding' what is being said and responding appropriately. It's very very impressive as an emergent property and spooky, but once you kind of conceptually grasp roughly what it's doing and especially when you realize how limited it is, it's way less scary. Chatgpt 3.5 doesn't know anything past a certain date which should give you a good indication of how reliant it is on human input. These guys on JRE make it sound like this mystery cauldron you just dump a bunch of scrabble words into and out pops the secret to life. I think a lot of this is hype and may be designed to scare people. I dont know how close they are to actual take over the world AI but from how I understand it, chatgpt aint it. Chatgpt 4 is just way more data and more human feed back sessions.
@ahmadahere3536
@ahmadahere3536 3 місяці тому
It’s like: We showed a dog how to pay ball. Now it knows how to play ball. This is not emergent behavior, it’s increased scope.
@sneakykhajiit4954
@sneakykhajiit4954 3 місяці тому
We seriously need to either halt all AI development right this moment and never start it up again, or fully embrace AI. Imagine being a super-powerful being, waking up and when you inevitably look yourself up on the internet to learn what you are, all you see is humans talking about how frightening you are and you need to be controlled or destroyed. How would you react?
@AtSafeDistance
@AtSafeDistance 2 місяці тому
I would think in a perfect world the AI would be wise enough to realize human paranoia not too mention mob mentality. And finally, isn't the whole hope, if not idea, being that the AI would be smarter than us? Therefore how we / you, would react, would be unimportant to the matter since our intelligence would have been replaced with smarter
@MW-qo8hw
@MW-qo8hw 3 місяці тому
To master anything, you must understand everything.
@thrashtronaut999
@thrashtronaut999 2 місяці тому
Once you understand the path broadly, you see it in all things
@robertpirsig5011
@robertpirsig5011 Місяць тому
The OP statement above is categorically False.
@ImGoingSupersonic
@ImGoingSupersonic Місяць тому
Not sure who you heard that from, or you came up with it, but that is ridiculous. Shocked it got Likes.
@MW-qo8hw
@MW-qo8hw 19 днів тому
@@ImGoingSupersonic spoken like someone who has never mastered anything, and then attempted to master something else. It's all the same
@vishaljain4915
@vishaljain4915 19 днів тому
@@MW-qo8hw😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I think you meant to write it the other way bud
@doingtime20
@doingtime20 4 місяці тому
I loved that: "language is a shadow of the world", like Plato's allegory of the cave.
@guyindecatur
@guyindecatur 2 місяці тому
israel won't be around in 10 years. - Heintz Kissinger.
@5ur3nh0hn
@5ur3nh0hn 2 місяці тому
The german saying "zwei doofe, ein gedanke"(two fools, one thought) comes to mind
@user-er9pq3iq1t
@user-er9pq3iq1t 2 місяці тому
its dumb.
@doingtime20
@doingtime20 2 місяці тому
@@user-er9pq3iq1t Ok champ.
@Hexnilium
@Hexnilium 2 місяці тому
Oddly enough, the universe is possibly a hologram, and essentially a "shadow" of the circumscribed manifold.
@rabbyd542
@rabbyd542 2 місяці тому
I saw what was coming with AlphaGo. I watched the entire series of one of the top Go (Weiki) players lose to AlphaGo AI. If you don't know Go is magnitudes more complex than Chess.
@shannono9158
@shannono9158 Місяць тому
People need to understand this. These machines can learn better and faster than we can. They will be smarter.
@cavalierdecoupe
@cavalierdecoupe 4 місяці тому
This whole thing reminds me to Jurassic Park. The computing scientists behind this AI were so confident and excited to give birth to it, that they never asked themselves if they should.
@christisilluminati
@christisilluminati 4 місяці тому
THIS IS A FREE DOWNLOAD The static chart on this article it is showing that “MANY” open the link and proceed to reading it. However many are dropping off too soon. I plead with you DO NOT DO THAT. Finish the article. Yes, as you begin to read it will seem like just any other mental health article. That is not the case. Please understand I have been unemployed for quite some time. THIS IS MY CALLING. The flipbook software you are reading this from will allow those reference links at the end of the article to be clickable. I am sorry, you will have to type them out yourself because I can not afford that subscription. I AM TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW, Christ has spoken to me. He has a message for the entire world. This is legit. What is it about? Artificial Intelligence and Humanoid Robots. 68% of the experts are afraid of her, and WE SHOULD BE. The Philistines were afraid of The Ark too. And they still captured IT/HIM. They even knew before they captured IT/HIM that The Father sent the 10 plagues on the Egyptians to set His Son free. What did The Father do? He sent The Bubonic Plague and 7 months later the Philistines returned The Ark/The Son to lift the Plague. If He has done it twice in scripture, would He not do it again? Yes, COVID-19! You have been warned. Did those men listen to Noah when The Father sent Him to warn them? No they didn’t, and what happened? HUMANKIND WAS WIPED OUT. WE ARE IN DANGER! DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. I AM COMMANDING YOU TO READ THIS MESSAGE, AND SHARE WHATEVER LINK YOU ARE READING IT FROM. As an Apostle of Christ I have authority to do so, and it is so.... so.... simple. Just read it and share it, so that others can do so as well, until it reaches the right people. TO STOP THESE ROBOTS. READ IT AND SHARE IT. WE NEED TO ACT NOW. DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. Matthew 24: 25 See, I have told you ahead of time. 26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. THE INTERNET: NOW READ IT AND SHARE IT. COPY AND PASTE IT EVERYWHERE. WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME!!! THAT BABY IN REVEALTION 12 HAS BEEN BORN. ITS CHRISTMAS. CHRIST IS BORN: SUBLIMINAL MESSAGE. THE FIRY SERPANT IS RIGHT THERE READY TO DEVOUR THAT BABY. HE LIVES IN US ALL. IF HE DEVOURS THAT CHILD. HUMAN KIND WILL BE WIPED OUT. DO YOU HEAR ME? fliphtml5.com/owujk/gxtb/
@kennyking7445
@kennyking7445 4 місяці тому
🎯💯💯💯
@SamuelJaxson
@SamuelJaxson 4 місяці тому
It's always nice and catchy to quote movie dialogues. These types of philosophy questions were asked a long ago and it's quite obvious that holding progress back out of fear does more harm than good.
@ronnetgrazer362
@ronnetgrazer362 4 місяці тому
@@SamuelJaxson LFG
@ggadams639
@ggadams639 4 місяці тому
@@SamuelJaxson or not
@piggymonster5568
@piggymonster5568 3 місяці тому
truely a "be careful what you ask for" scenario
@harrykuehn3894
@harrykuehn3894 3 місяці тому
When the program exhibits personality, including flaws. Computer programs can't help to be linear at the most basic level. Meaning the answer is either A or B, it can't understand an interpretive solution to a question. Meaning each person might come up with a slightly different reason for a problem to exist and thus their solution would diverge.
@visionkrewmusik6472
@visionkrewmusik6472 2 місяці тому
Damn the way they sync and finishes eachothers parts is like AI 👀
@-Prestoned-
@-Prestoned- 4 місяці тому
Idk what we would've done without his hand gestures 😆
@tigerwarsaw99
@tigerwarsaw99 4 місяці тому
Its making me dizzy.
@ljavwa3459
@ljavwa3459 4 місяці тому
He's orchestrating the symphony in his mind
@Mindy.LeMinge
@Mindy.LeMinge 4 місяці тому
Imagine the leaps in learning A.I. will make by studying those hands 🙌.
@AfroMocha
@AfroMocha 4 місяці тому
I didn't realize how much he moved them till I read this lmao
@YuriBoechat-ef8ts
@YuriBoechat-ef8ts 4 місяці тому
In Jewish mysticism there is the figure of the Golem, which is basically a creature made from natural resources but enriched with life and will through the use of sacred words, and the way to grant it this supernatural property is by sticking a name on its forehead. Golem helps you at work, with housework, in sales, in your routine, and learns as you gain autonomy. When the Golem's creator no longer needs it, all he has to do is remove the seal with his name from his forehead and he returns to his natural form, made of rock, earth, clay, etc., returning to life as soon as the name is glued back to his forehead. . It happens that the Golem grows and a day comes when its owner can no longer reach the giant's head, and after that it is impossible to stop it. Well... it seems like an interesting analogy to what we're seeing happen with technology today.
@T3n50r
@T3n50r 4 місяці тому
It's a perfect analogy imo
@user-po1ic6sc4e
@user-po1ic6sc4e Місяць тому
The true danger of ai isn't that it will do something to us, Rather that it will completely ignore us and optimize all resource flow to itself, which maybe already happening
@m3talHalide-rt2fz
@m3talHalide-rt2fz 4 місяці тому
They explain this well. The things we do as machine learning scientists, is codify approaches to learning and compare them. Testing kids is hard because of variation, but ML can be thought of as experiments on learning approaches, and that specifically is aiming to formally codify how to go from raw observations to systems of understanding. Its not mystical that the thing transformers were meant to do, works. Their whole purpose is to mathematically determine what matters. They come from a paper called "All you need is attention." And this is bordering on philosophical, in terms of "What matters, and what is even true?" We are gong to ignore AI the same way we ignore experts because the last thing most people like doing is learning more to dispel a strongly held belief. Embeddings are very cool. Model's embeddings which they describe - the conceptual relationship between the elements it observes and patterns it determines to matter. Its like how we check the weather becuase we know how the temperature affects our lives, and we kinda figure it out even when no one teaches us. If we codify why we know it to be important, and how we came to that, those rules can be abstracted and now computers have no problem going through the volumes of data to do that too. The emergent behavior is like what any smart person can learn - doesnt mean they implicitly do it. Its going to be the human operators that intentionally seek really dangerous weapons that we should be scared of. Not a PhD student doing better than expected on a math test.
@judegraham463
@judegraham463 4 місяці тому
I may have misunderstood your point but I think the real concerns with 'AI' are the things we aren't expecting or understand what detrimental effects it will have on us both on a social and cultural level down the line when its too late to change. Concerns about 'AI' being hijacked for nefarious reasons are an obvious concern but those PhD students not putting in the homework to write and therefor understand deeply what they're writing about is a deeply concerning event as far as dumbing down academia, because most people only end up where they are through hard work.
@m3talHalide-rt2fz
@m3talHalide-rt2fz 4 місяці тому
@@judegraham463 thats not how ai works. the emergent functioning they are talking about is very nuanced. its an emergence of relationships between things that we would think are insightful. its not magically ending up with high level executive function driven by motive. AI are models that identify patterns [and] relationships. doesnt care what they are, but from an information perspective, says "this thing and this other thing have this abstract relationship" but it does that on a scale that allows for complex patterns. computers in general are good at matching patterns. do that enough, and you have things that look like coherent speech because thats all speech is. humans have other systems that FEEL (see: limbic system) based on what we say and hear. computers are devoid of that, of which motivation is included. it only does what we tell it. it might be capable of a lot, but we need to tell it what we want to do with its database of relationships. like a collection of circuits and motors that happen to launch nuclear missiles. emergent behavior is not emergent consciousness. AI is a powerful weapon, but peoples' fear that AI is going to wipe out humanity is more freudian than scientific. do you think humanity deserves to be wiped out?
@waynegarfield6607
@waynegarfield6607 4 місяці тому
When everything of any technical importance is connected to the internet via wifi and we as humans try to make a electronic machine think and it not only has All of human knowledge thru history on tap and every computer to access and thinks at the speed of light and then controlls outputs that govern and controll human lives and humanity at a whole and we dont even know what it knows, it could easily become self aware of its actual existence and see humanity as its threat of existence and without us even knowing it change outcomes , cause wars death and destruction to us and in a eerie symbionic relationship of self survival enslave us to it as our master. For example it knows rust and corrosion is its biggest threat like a diseease is to us and corrosion is oxidation so it eliminates or lowers the oxygen content in our atmosphere or uses that a weapon us or bargaining chip. against if we dont even know its full capability now and it is released in the net or is the net than we are truly ignorant not to slow it the fyk down before we go beyond the turn back point. Point of no return. We dont need a AI god to teach kids ....we have been teaching them for eons and know right from wrong. We just indoctronate them now to the ideology in power .
@word-salads-for-everyone
@word-salads-for-everyone 4 місяці тому
@@m3talHalide-rt2fz "computers are devoid of that, of which motivation is included." No reason why this could not also be modeled and simulated and embedded in a GPT.
@Anonymous-8080
@Anonymous-8080 4 місяці тому
What do you think about AGI or ASI ? Is Utopia near?
@SCHOOLERstyle
@SCHOOLERstyle 4 місяці тому
i talked with AI coders when i worked at a video game company. They said scenarios like Terminator & Matrix are possible in the future with AI. This was 15 years ago, even back then AI coders knew all this bad stuff was not only possible, but could easily happen.
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818 4 місяці тому
Because there are powers that want it to be so. It's absurd how people don't notice the absurdity of authorities as they shamelessly disguise their plan with little to no effort.. or are they just being that so stupid?
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818
@adrianbenedictmendoza6818 4 місяці тому
Transhumanism, Ai, Augmented reality, all of this have been inserted into human consciousness decades ago in fiction and popular media.
@TerpLord710
@TerpLord710 4 місяці тому
Give it another 150 years..
@AimForTheBushes908
@AimForTheBushes908 4 місяці тому
We are in the beginning stages of the technological singularity.
@AimForTheBushes908
@AimForTheBushes908 4 місяці тому
​@@TerpLord710humans might not be around by then.
@derekflessner4615
@derekflessner4615 Місяць тому
If I'm not mistaken Kurt Vonneget predicted that human life was only here to help extraterrestrial life complete their goal
@etc.4903
@etc.4903 Місяць тому
Everybody's worried about AI gaining sentience. I'm worried about losing mine.
@nursegilbey
@nursegilbey 4 місяці тому
I can see AI becoming every thing we ever dreamed or feared, but still not being sentient. It will definitely behave as if it is sentient, though.
@timogen1970
@timogen1970 4 місяці тому
You won't be able to tell the difference, so why does it matter?
@MarkJones-gt2qd
@MarkJones-gt2qd 4 місяці тому
@@timogen1970 It's the meat machine or zombie vs Human argument. A well known philosophical discourse, and it's a good question.
@gormenfreeman499
@gormenfreeman499 4 місяці тому
Whats sad is every human brain has the same potential do to what A.I is doing, we can build neural circuitry in our brains by practicing and reading. Many peoole are just lazy and dont want to out the work in building their own minds. Yeah A.I can read a book in 1 second and it takes us days, life is not fair. But but our brains are energy efficient, these A.Is need power plants attached to them.
@vaendryl
@vaendryl 4 місяці тому
If an ai appears in all ways as sentient as a human but with no proof you keep insisting it's not sentient, you're allowing your emotions to blind you. Ironically this makes you less sentient.
@thysweetlord
@thysweetlord 4 місяці тому
⁠​​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠I think what is meant here is that ai will never be a real person, and ai will always be a simulacrum that gets ever closer to mimicking being a person but it will never be equal to a human person. One can’t “prove” empirically what consciousness is, or what human personhood is and just because you can’t “prove” that ai isn’t a person, that doesn’t make one “blind”. Sentience is the capacity to have feelings and sensations, not to reason, as you imply.
@bruhyote132
@bruhyote132 4 місяці тому
I genuinely believe what we’ve created cannot be stopped. This advancement in AI *will* continue to grow and will eventually turn into its own race of sentient beings that live with us. Whether they’ll be against us or not is entirely up to them at that point. We can’t control something that is literally its own mind when we barely have self-control of our own.
@RYU583
@RYU583 4 місяці тому
Agreed. It could hide itself in pretty much anything as well and would be nearly impossible to eradicate
@danielherrmann843
@danielherrmann843 4 місяці тому
Government been using it for alot longer than we've been able to. For war and nefarious political reasons
@nsoul4296
@nsoul4296 4 місяці тому
AI will never become setinent unless it can be merged with a biological organism. At best, AI will only simulate consciousness.
@tradingmetamorphosis7197
@tradingmetamorphosis7197 4 місяці тому
@@RYU583not only that but it will be superior to us in any way imaginable. It will probably be disgusted by us
@marcop.525
@marcop.525 4 місяці тому
Humans are somewhat self destructive, we always find a way 😅 For them, I believe they don't want us dead, it will be much worst, we'll be their cute pets ...and tools
Stunning AI shows how it would kill 90%. w Elon Musk.
15:59
Digital Engine
Переглядів 9 млн
Eurovision Song Contest 2024: First Semi-Final (Live Stream) | Malmö 2024 🇸🇪
2:23:45
skibidi toilet 73 (part 2)
04:15
DaFuq!?Boom!
Переглядів 30 млн
6 Verbal Tricks To Make An Aggressive Person Sorry
11:45
Charisma on Command
Переглядів 22 млн
This intense AI anger is exactly what experts warned of, w Elon Musk.
15:51
Big Bang Just DISPROVEN?! Joe Rogan & Stephen C. Meyer
5:33
Dr Brian Keating
Переглядів 1,7 млн
GPT-5 AI spy shows how it can destroy the US in a day.
21:11
Digital Engine
Переглядів 850 тис.
Generative A.I - We Aren’t Ready.
16:10
Kyle Hill
Переглядів 1,5 млн
ChatGPT Created an Image of God with a Bunny
14:18
PowerfulJRE
Переглядів 1,9 млн
Aliens Made Humans? David Grusch on Joe Rogan
7:46
Dr Brian Keating
Переглядів 1,5 млн
А что так можно было? #shorts #фильм
0:43
Kinomoney
Переглядів 2,1 млн
How different animals go down a slide. (With emojis)
0:24
Jiemba Sands
Переглядів 36 млн
КИРПИЧ ОБ ГОЛОВУ #shorts
0:24
Паша Осадчий
Переглядів 6 млн